Mutations associated with very late-onset metachromatic leukodystrophy

Isolated Peripheral Neuropathy in Atypical Metachromatic Leukodystrophy: A Recurrent Mutation

Background:

Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is a genetic neurodegenerative disorder resulting from a deficiency of arylsulfatase A. Late onset forms are relatively rare. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement is characteristic at all ages.

Methods:

A patient in her late 40s with peripheral neuropathy was assessed by EEG, evoked potentials, CTand nerve conduction studies. Nerve and muscle biopsy samples were investigated by electron microscopy. Arylsulfatase A activity in leukocytes and excreted cerebroside sulfate were determined. The arylsulfatase A gene was investigated for mutations using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNAsequencing. The identified mutation was expressed transiently in African green monkey kidney (COS) cells to determine the effect of the mutation on arylsulfatase A activity.

Results:

Central nervous system functions were normal. Nerve conduction velocities were decreased. Sural nerve biopsy showed inclusions typical of MLD. Arylsulfatase A was less than 5% of normal. A homozygous mutation thr286pro was identified in the arylsulfatase A gene and demonstrated to be deleterious through transient expression studies.

Conclusions:

Our patient has a progressive peripheral neuropathy but has apparently intact CNS function at her present age of 57 years. Biochemical, physiological and pathological findings are consistent with a diagnosis of MLD. A homozygous mutation, thr286pro, found in her arylsulfatase A gene, decreased enzyme activity to a level consistent with a late onset form of MLD.

Metachromatic leukodystrophy: genetics, pathogenesis and therapeutic options

Metachromatic leukodystrophy is a lysosomal storage disease caused by the deficiency of arylsulphatase A (ASA). This leads to storage of the membrane lipid sulphatide, which is abundant in myelin. A pathological hallmark of the disease is demyelination, causing various and ultimately lethal neurological symptoms. Today more than 110 mutations in the ASA gene have been identified, of which only three are frequent. Patients homozygous for alleles, which do not allow for the synthesis of functional ASA always suffer from the severe form of the disease, whereas alleles allowing the expression of residual enzyme activity are associated with the later onset juvenile or adult forms of metachromatic leukodystrophy. In addition, there are other as yet unknown genetic or epigenetic factors modifying the phenotype substantially. ASA-deficient mice have been generated as a model of metachromatic leukodystrophy. These mice store sulphatide and show progressive neurological symptoms, but do not demyelinate. This animal model was recently improved using a transgenic approach, which generated mice in which sulphatide synthesis in myelin-producing cells is enhanced. This new animal model reflects the pathological characteristics of the human disease. ASA-deficient mice have been used in various therapeutic trials involving enzyme replacement, haematopoietic stem-cell-based gene therapy and direct injections of ASA-expressing viral vectors into the brain. These animal studies have paved the way for future clinical studies of enzyme replacement and gene therapy.

CONCLUSION

For many years this devastating disorder was considered untreatable and the outlook for patients was poor. Within a comparatively short period of time since the ASA gene was cloned in 1989, genetic and biochemical studies and data generated from newly developed animal models have led to the first clinical trials. It is hoped that these developments will prove beneficial for patients.

What can cell biology tell us about heterogeneity in lysosomal storage diseases?

Lysosomal storage diseases are clinically heterogeneous with respect to their age of onset, progression of symptoms and the particular organs involved. Varying levels of residual enzyme activity, associated with different defective alleles that cause the respective diseases, are responsible in part for this clinical heterogeneity. In general, the higher the residual enzyme activity, the milder the phenotype. Enzyme activity in severe forms of disease is frequently zero, and in mild forms usually does not exceed approximately 5%. However, the correlation is not so strict as to allow prediction of the phenotype of individual patients. The molecular basis of the different levels of enzyme activity can only be revealed by biochemical investigations of the defective lysosomal proteins. Null alleles may be due to splice-site mutations or deletions. In the case of missense mutations, enzymes frequently fold incorrectly and are retained in the endoplasmic reticulum and subsequently degraded. As these enzymes do not reach the lysosome, they do not provide any functional residual activity. Residual enzyme activity is only observed in cases where the defective enzyme reaches the lysosome and has retained enzymatic activity. Patients carrying the same mutant alleles still show considerable phenotypic variability due to modifying genes and epigenetic factors. None of these has so far been elucidated. However, there are some indications that differences in splicing-factor machinery may influence the phenotypic expression of splice-site mutations and that hormonal modulation of secondary microglial activation in lipidosis may also influence the disease course.

CONCLUSION

Phenotypic variability is a frequent phenomenon in lysosomal storage diseases. Residual enzyme activity has been identified as one of the factors influencing the clinical outcome of disease; however, it is obvious that other genetic and epigenetic factors also affect phenotypic variability, particularly in patients with late onset disease.