Early HBeAg loss during peginterferon alpha-2b therapy predicts HBsAg loss: results of a long-term follow-up study in chronic hepatitis B patients

The efficacy and safety of adding on or switching to peginterferon α-2b in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term entecavir treatment: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The strategies of adding on or switching to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) improved the serological response rates in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had previously experienced treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. However, robust data on which combination strategy is more effective remain lacking.

METHODS

In this multicentre, parallel, open-label, randomised, controlled trial, patients with HBeAg-positive CHB who were treated with entecavir ≥2 years, and had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) <3000 IU/ml, HBeAg <200S/CO and HBV DNA <50 IU/ml were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to add on PEG-IFN, switch to PEG-IFN or continue entecavir monotherapy for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was HBeAg seroconversion at week 48.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were randomised into three treatment arms (50 in add-on, 52 in switch-to and 51 in monotherapy). Compared with continuous entecavir monotherapy, both add-on and switch-to strategies achieved higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion (18.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.007; 19.2% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005, respectively), HBeAg loss (24.0% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.010; 23.1% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.013, respectively), HBsAg < 100 IU/ml (30.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001; 34.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001, respectively), and higher HBsAg reduction (-0.90 vs. -0.06 log₁₀ IU/ml, p < 0.001; -0.92 vs. -0.06 log₁₀ IU/ml, p < 0.001, respectively) at week 48. The efficacy was comparable between add-on and switch-to arms (p > 0.05). Adverse events were mainly related to PEG-IFN but generally tolerable.

CONCLUSION

In patients with CHB who achieved virological response with long-term entecavir, both adding on and switching to PEG-IFN are alternative strategies resulting in higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg reduction than continuous entecavir.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-17012055).

Switching to or Add-on Peginterferon in Patients on Nucleos(t)ide Analogues for Chronic Hepatitis B: The SWAP RCT

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The optimal therapeutic strategy in nucleoside analogue (NA) experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) using peginterferon is still unclear; hence we explored a switch to or add-on peginterferon strategy versus continued NA.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of CHB patients on NA >12 months with HBV DNA(-) randomized to switch or add-on peginterferon-alpha2b (1.5 μg/kg/weekly) for 48 weeks versus continuing NA (controls) (allocation 2:2:1; Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT01928511) in tertiary Singapore hospitals. The primary composite endpoint at week 72 was hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss or quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) >1 log IU/mL reduction, and secondary endpoints were HBsAg loss, HBsAg seroconversion, qHBsAg <200 IU/mL, qHBsAg <100 IU/mL, HBV DNA(-), viral relapse, and safety. Analysis was by intention-to-treat (ITT).

RESULTS

A total of 253 patients (controls 51, switch 103, add-on 99) were randomized. The primary ITT endpoint was achieved in 3.9% of controls, 33.3% of switch, and 26.7% of add-on (P < .0001, switch/add-on versus controls). HBsAg loss occurred in 0% of controls, 7.8% of switch, and 10.1% of add-on (ITT, P < .001, switch/add-on versus controls). HBeAg(+) patients on peginterferon had higher HBeAg loss than controls but poor HBsAg responses, whereas HBeAg(-) patients on peginterferon achieved better HBsAg responses than controls. Reduction in qHBsAg in HBeAg(+) was 0.14 log IU/mL versus 0.51 log IU/mL in HBeAg(-) (P < .0001) in peginterferon-treated patients. Clinical relapse was higher in switch (13.6% overall, 27% in HBeAg(+)) versus 1% add-on and 0% controls. Adverse events were typically interferon-related symptoms, with one death (myocardial infarction unrelated to therapy).

CONCLUSIONS

ITT analysis showed that either peginterferon strategies were superior to NA for the primary endpoint and HBsAg loss, but add-on peginterferon is preferred to switch due to improved safety and similar efficacy. ClincialTrials.gov number: NCT01928511.

HBeAg Levels Vary across the Different Stages of HBV Infection According to the Extent of Immunological Pressure and Are Associated with Therapeutic Outcome in the Setting of Immunosuppression-Driven HBV Reactivation

HBeAg is a marker of HBV-activity, and HBeAg-loss predicts a favorable clinical outcome. Here, we characterize HBeAg-levels across different phases of HBV infection, their correlation with virological/biochemical markers and the virological response to anti-HBV therapy. Quantitative HBeAg (qHBeAg, DiaSorin) is assessed in 101 HBeAg+ patients: 20 with acute-infection, 20 with chronic infection, 32 with chronic hepatitis and 29 with immunosuppression-driven HBV-reactivation (HBV-R). A total of 15/29 patients with HBV-R are monitored for >12 months after starting TDF/ETV. qHBeAg is higher in immunosuppression-driven HBV-R (median[IQR]:930[206-1945]PEIU/mL) and declines in chronic hepatitis (481[28-1393]PEIU/mL, p = 0.03), suggesting HBeAg production, modulated by the extent of immunological pressure. This is reinforced by the negative correlation between qHBeAg and ALT in acute infection (Rho = -0.66, p = 0.006) and chronic hepatitis (Rho = -0.35; p = 0.05). Interestingly, qHBeAg strongly and positively correlates with qHBsAg across the study groups, suggesting cccDNA as a major source of both proteins in the setting of HBeAg positivity (with limited contribution of integrated HBV-DNA to HBsAg production). Focusing on 15 patients with HBV-R starting TDF/ETV, virological suppression and HBeAg-loss are achieved in 60% and 53.3%. Notably, the combination of qHBeAg > 2000 PEIU/mL + qHBsAg > 52,000 IU/mL at HBV-R is the only factor predicting no HBeAg loss (HBeAg loss: 0% with vs. 72.7% without qHBeAg > 2000 PEIU/mL + qHBsAg > 52,000 IU/mL, p = 0.03). In conclusion, qHBeAg varies over the natural course of HBV infection, according to the extent of immunological pressure. In the setting of HBV-R, qHBeAg could be useful in predicting the treatment response under immunosuppression.

The effects of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues on host immune cells: the baseline for future immune therapy for HBV?

HBV is a non-cytopathic virus and the progression of liver fibrosis is attributed to the host immune response. Complete suppression of viral replication using nucleotide or nucleoside analogues (NUCs) can prevent most complications related to chronic HBV infection. Unfortunately, antiviral treatment has to be administered lifelong to the majority of patients as HBV persists in the hepatocytes. However, although NUCs are very frequently administered in clinical practice, their effects on vital parts of the host immune response to HBV are not well established. In this review we summarize the currently available data gathered from longitudinal studies that investigated treatment-associated alterations of HBV-specific CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T-cells, regulatory T-cells and natural killer (NK) cells. These observations are important, as they can guide the design of studies that investigate the efficacy of new immune therapeutic agents. Novel experimental compounds will likely be added to ongoing NUC treatment, which leads to a functional cure in only a small minority of patients.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegylated interferon for the treatment of hepatitis B

Introduction: Interferon (IFN) had both antiviral and immunomodulatory effects, and was one of the approved treatments for hepatitis B virus (HBV). Herein, we reviewed the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegylated IFN-α (PegIFN-α) for the treatment of HBV. Areas covered: The steady-state serum levels of PegIFN-α were reached within 5 to 8 weeks, and the week 48 mean trough concentrations were approximately 2-fold higher than week 1. There was also no difference of the pharmacokinetics in male or female, healthy volunteers or patients with hepatitis B or C infection. PegIFN-α did not affect the metabolism of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes, except inhibition of CYP1A2. There was also no pharmacokinetic interaction between PegIFN-α and HBV nucleot(s)ide analogues (NUCs). Forty-eight weeks of PegIFN-α achieved 32% of HBeAg seroconversion, 32-43% of HBV DNA suppression, 41-59% of ALT normalization, and 3% of HBsAg seroconversion rate with a post-treatment durable response up to 80% in the initial responders. Expert opinion: On-treatment HBsAg titer guided the treatment of HBV with PegIFN-α. The recommendation of PegIFN-α and NUC combination or switch remained controversial. New immunotherapeutic agents are now in development. Although, PegIFN-α should continue to play a role in the treatment of HBV.

Sustained serological and complete responses in HBeAg-positive patients treated with Peginterferon alfa-2b: a 6-year long-term follow-up of a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in China

BACKGROUND

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa-2b is recommended for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to investigate the sustainability of off-treatment responses among Chinese HBeAg-positive CHB patients treated with PEG-IFN alfa-2b from a randomized trial.

METHODS

Eligible Chinese patients (n = 322) were followed up by one visit after a median of 6 years (LTFU) following their participation in a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of three PEG-IFN alfa-2b dosing regimens (1.0 or 1.5 μg/kg/wk. 24 weeks or 1.5 μg/kg/wk. 48 weeks). Primary endpoints at the LTFU were sustained SR and CR (SR/CR at the end of original study [EOS] and at the LTFU). SR was defined as HBeAg loss and seroconversion to anti-HBe and CR as HBeAg loss and seroconversion to anti-HBe and HBV-DNA < 2000 IU/mL.

RESULTS

The proportions of patients achieving sustained SR among patients who had SR at EOS were high in three treatment groups (61.9, 65.5, 76.5%, respectively, p = 0.46); treatment with PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5 μg/kg/wk. 48 weeks had the highest proportion of a sustained CR among patients who had CR at EOS (75.0%, p = 0.05). A considerable number of patients achieved sustained SR (18.2-29.9%) and sustained CR (14.8-18.3%) after EOS despite no further NA treatment. At the LTFU, rates of SR and CR were less than 70.0 and 50.0%, respectively, among all enrolled patients regardless of additional nucleos(t)ide analogs before the LTFU.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG IFN alfa-2b therapy had considerable off-treatment sustainability in Chinese HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B patients with serological and complete responses.

The role of peginterferon in nucleos(t)ide-analogue-treated chronic hepatitis B patients: A review of published literature

Chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) causes up to 1.0 million deaths annually. Currently, more than 90% of CHB patients worldwide are receiving indefinite nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy. New strategies for optimizing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss are required for NA-treated patients as the majority are unable to achieve HBsAg loss and may require lifelong therapy. In hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, switching from NAs to finite peginterferon (PegIFN) therapy can double HBeAg seroconversion rates. One in five patients who switch to PegIFN can achieve HBsAg loss, whereas patients who continue NA therapy typically do not. In HBeAg-negative NA-treated patients, add-on PegIFN therapy achieves higher, albeit modest, HBsAg loss rates compared with continued NA monotherapy and offers the opportunity for NA-treated patients to achieve the inactive carrier state. In the absence of curative therapies, PegIFN represents a valuable, finite option for NA-treated patients who would otherwise require potentially lifelong therapy.

Long-term follow up of peginterferon-α-2a treatment of hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) positive and HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B patients in phase II and III studies

AIM

We analyzed the 5-year post-treatment response to peginterferon α-2a (PEG IFN-α-2a) in hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) positive and negative chronic hepatitis B patients.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-seven chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving 90 μg or 180 μg of PEG IFN-α-2a for 24 or 48 weeks in phase II or III studies were enrolled in the study, including 100 HBeAg positive patients and 37 HBeAg negative patients; 121 patients (88.4%) had genotype C.

RESULTS

Of the 137 patients, 94 received additional antiviral therapy because of viral reactivation and 43 did not receive any additional antiviral treatment during follow up. Five years upon PEG IFN-α-2a treatment, 32 patients (23.4%) who did not receive any additional antiviral agent after PEG IFN-α-2a therapy achieved a good response (normal serum alanine aminotransferase, low-level hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA, and HBeAg negativity). Female sex and low HBV DNA levels by the end of treatment were independently associated with favorable 5-year post-treatment responses. Forty-eight-week administration of PEG IFN-α-2a showed a better response (26.4%) than 24-week administration (18.0%). Six patients (4.3%), four males and two females, cleared hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) during the 5-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The 48-week administration of PEG IFN-α-2a achieved better biochemical and virological responses than the 24-week administration, particularly in younger females. The 5-year post-treatment response rate was 23.4%; however, more than two-thirds of the patients received additional antiviral therapy because of viral reactivation after PEG IFN-α-2a treatment. HBsAg clearance was noted in six patients (4.3%). PEG IFN-α-2a is effective in young female patients.

Combination or sequential therapy with entecavir and interferon in chronic hepatitis B patients: Current status, problems and prospects

Sixteen years have passed since the initial antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Goal of the antiviral treatment is not only to suppress viral replication, but to achieve sustained response after a limited period of treatment and then discontinuation of drugs. Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) and interferons are two types of therapeutic agents with different antiviral mechanisms for treatment of CHB. Monotherapy with NAs or interferons can only achieve ideal goal in a part of CHB patients, and combination and/or sequential therapy with both is an important attempt for CHB treatment in recent years. For patients previously treated with NAs, interferons can be used to replace NAs or in combination with them for a limited period. If interferons do not show good efficacy, then NAs, alone or in combination with interferons, can be used. For patients with high viral load, initial combination therapy may show better efficacy. According to the baseline and response guidelines, the treatment plan should be optimized frequently, and the treatment compliance emphasized with maintenance, medication and examination, along with the administration of chronic diseases, in order to ensure that HBV DNA level is lower than baseline level. For those who have had a continuous drop of HBsAg and HBeAg levels, prolonged treatment or combination of the treatment with dendritic cell (DC) therapy and immunotherapy may achieve more persistent immune control.

HLA-DP genes polymorphisms associate with hepatitis B surface antigen kinetics and seroclearance during nucleot(s)ide analogue therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) recently indicated that polymorphisms in the human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-DP genes were associated with risk of persistent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and clearance of HBV, but the effect of HLA-DP gene polymorphisms on the effect of antiviral therapy was unknown. We here investigated whether such polymorphisms were associated with decreases in HBsAg levels and seroclearance in patients who received long-term lamivudine (LAM) treatment.

METHODS

Japanese patients (202) who were hepatitis B e antigen positive at baseline, received LAM as first-line treatment, and consented to HLA-DP genotyping (HLA-DPA1 rs3077 and HLA-DPB1 rs9277535) were categorized into two cohorts, viz., a cohort who achieved virological response without rescue therapy (cohort 1) and those who did so with rescue therapy (cohort 2).

RESULTS

Serum HBsAg levels declined significantly between year 3 and 9 from baseline among cohort 1 patients possessing ≥2 A-alleles at rs3077 and rs9277535. The percentages of such patients in cohort 1 patients with decreases in HBsAg ≥0.5 log IU/ml were higher than those with <2 A-alleles (71.8% [28/39] vs. 38.9% [23/59]; P = 0.004). However, there was no significant difference in cumulative HBsAg seroclearance rates between patients with ≥2 and those with <2 A-alleles in cohort 1. In cohort 2, HBsAg seroclearance rates were higher in patients with ≥2 A-alleles than in those with <2 A-alleles (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

We found an association between HLA-DP polymorphisms and decreases in HBsAg levels and seroclearance among HBeAg-positive patients treated with LAM.

HBsAg plasma level kinetics: a new role for an old marker as a therapy response predictor in vertically infected children on combination therapy

We aimed to investigate the ability of HBsAg plasma level kinetics to predict therapy response by studying 23 children with infancy-acquired chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during combination sequential therapy with lead-in lamivudine (LAM) and add-on interferon-α (IFN-α) [5 responders (R = anti-HBs seroconversion) and 18 nonresponders (NR)] and to assess their relationship with pretreatment intrahepatic HBV-DNA and cccDNA and HBsAg and HBcAg liver expression. Plasma HBsAg levels were measured in samples before (treatment week 0 = TW0), during (TW9, TW28, TW52) and after (follow-up week = FUW24) therapy by Abbott ARCHITECT(®) assay [log10 IU/mL]. Baseline liver HBV-DNA and cccDNA were quantified by real-time TaqMan PCR [log10 copies/ng genomic DNA]. HBsAg and HBcAg liver expression was evaluated by immunostaining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens [number of positive cells/1000 hepatocytes]. All results are presented as medians. Plasma: at baseline, on-treatment and during follow-up, HBsAg levels were lower in R than NR (TW0: 4.36 vs 4.75;TW28: 2.44 vs 4.35;TW52: 0 vs 4.08 and FUW24: 0.17 vs 4.35, all P < 0.05). Liver: baseline HBV-DNA (3.82 vs 4.71, P = 0.16) and cccDNA (1.98 vs 2.26, P = 0.18) tended to be lower in R than NR, HBsAg expression was lower in R than NR (0.5 vs 4.7, P = 0.03), and HBcAg expression was similar between R and NR. There were positive correlations between plasma HBsAg levels and liver HBV-DNA (r = 0.44, P = 0.04), cccDNA (r = 0.41, P = 0.04) and HBsAg liver expression (r = 0.38, P = 0.05). Lower baseline HBsAg plasma levels, lower HBsAg expression in liver and on-treatment decline of plasma HBsAg levels heralds HBsAg clearance and response to treatment in tolerant children with CHB.

Baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) as predictor of sustained HBsAg loss in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with pegylated interferon-α2a and adefovir

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to identify baseline predictors of response in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with a combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN)-α2a and adefovir.

METHODS

We treated 92 chronic hepatitis B patients (44 hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and 48 HBeAg-negative) with HBV DNA > 100,000 copies/ml (> 17,182 IU/ml) with PEG-IFN and adefovir for 48 weeks and followed them up for 2 years. Baseline markers for HBeAg loss, combined response (HBeAg negativity, HBV DNA levels ≤ 2,000 IU/ml and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] normalization) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two years after the end of treatment, rates of HBeAg loss and HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive patients were 18/44 (41%) and 5/44 (11%), respectively. In HBeAg-negative patients, rates of combined response and HBsAg loss were 12/48 (25%) and 8/48 (17%), respectively. HBeAg-negative patients with HBsAg loss had lower baseline HBsAg levels than those without HBsAg loss (mean HBsAg 2.35 versus 3.55 log10 IU/ml; P < 0.001). They also had lower HBV DNA levels and were more often (PEG-)IFN experienced. Baseline HBsAg was the only independent predictor of HBsAg loss (OR 0.02; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

With combination therapy of PEG-IFN and adefovir for 48 weeks, a high rate of HBsAg loss was observed in both HBeAg-positive (11%) and HBeAg-negative (17%) patients 2 years after treatment ended. In HBeAg-negative patients, a low baseline HBsAg level was a strong predictor for HBsAg loss.

Loss of HBsAg and antiviral treatment: from basics to clinical significance

Accurate prediction of the sustained virological response (SVR) to antiviral therapy against chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is still a crucial problem needing profound investigation. In recent years, quantification of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), a reliable predictor of SVR and an ideal endpoint of treatment, has attracted increasing attention. Serum HBsAg titer may reflect the level of intrahepatic hepatitis B virus (HBV) covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in most patients, and vary with natural phases of chronic HBV infection, genotypes and variants, antiviral therapy, and other related factors. Serum HBsAg <200 IU/mL or yearly reduction ≥0.5 log10IU/mL may be the optimum cut-off values for prediction of the chance of spontaneous seroclearance of HBsAg. Serum HBsAg <1,000 IU/mL with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL may identify most of the inactive HBV carriers from active HBeAg(-) hepatitis. Interferon-based therapy can lead to more significant HBsAg decline than therapy based on nucleoside and/or nucleotide analogues. Different patterns or kinetics of HBsAg decline during therapy are related to different probabilities of SVR. A low HBsAg level, <3,000 IU/mL at baseline, or HBsAg level, <1,500 IU/mL at week 12, or a rapid on-treatment HBsAg decline of ≥0.5 log10IU/mL at week 12, may predict higher probability of SVR. However these cut-off values must be further validated for larger cohort of patients across genotypes worldwide. Incorporation of serum HBsAg level, HBeAg status, HBV DNA load, HBV genotypes, and other related factors might help establish new concept of more practical "response-guided treatment (RGT)" rules for antiviral therapy.

Clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen during long-term nucleot(s)ide analog treatment in chronic hepatitis B: results from a nine-year longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is considered the ultimate goal in chronic hepatitis B treatment. One treatment option is long-term nucleot(s)ide analog (NA) therapy. We followed a group of long-term NA therapy patients to evaluate the efficacy of this treatment in promoting clearance and longitudinal declines of HBsAg.

METHOD

The study included 791 NA therapy patients who received lamivudine as their first drug. At the baseline, 442 patients were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)+ and 349 were HBeAg-. All analyses were performed after separating the HBeAg+ and HBeAg- cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine which factors were associated with HBsAg clearance.

RESULTS

HBsAg clearance was observed in 18 (4.1 %) of the HBeAg+ patients and 20 (5.7 %) of the HBeAg- patients at baseline, giving seroclearance rates of 6.4 and 6.9 %, respectively, over the nine-year study period. HBsAg clearance was influenced by several independent factors that varied according to HBeAg cohort. For HBeAg+ patients, these included previous interferon therapy, infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype A, a ≥0.5 log IU/mL decline in HBsAg level within six months, and clearance of HBeAg at six months. For HBeAg- patients, these included infection with HBV genotype A, decline in HBsAg at six months, and a baseline HBsAg level of <730 IU/mL.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that both direct antiviral potential and host immune response are needed to achieve HBsAg clearance by NA therapy. Viral genotype strongly influenced HBsAg clearance during NA therapy.

Hepatitis B e antigen levels and response to peginterferon: influence of precore and basal core promoter mutants

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) levels may predict response to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) but are also influenced by presence of precore (PC) and core promoter (BCP) mutants. HBeAg was measured in 214 patients treated with PEG-IFN±lamivudine for 52weeks. Patients were classified at baseline as wildtype (WT) or non-WT (detectable PC/BCP mutants). Combined response (HBeAg loss with HBV DNA<2000IU/mL), HBeAg response (HBeAg loss with HBV DNA>2000IU/mL) or non-response was assessed at week78. Mean baseline HBeAg levels were 2.65logIU/mL in combined responders, 2.48 in non-responders and 2.24 in HBeAg responders (p=0.034). Baseline HBeAg levels were not associated with combined response after stratification by WT/non-WT. Within the PEG-IFN monotherapy group (n=104), patients with HBeAg<1logIU/mL at week24 had a higher probability of combined response (29% versus 12%, p=0.041). After stratification by WT/non-WT, WT patients with HBeAg<1logIU/mL at week24 had a probability of combined response of 78% (versus 19% in patients with >1logIU/mL, p<0.001), whereas no difference in response rates was observed in non-WT patients (p=0.848). The relationship between HBeAg levels and response to PEG-IFN depends upon the presence of PC/BCP mutants. HBeAg levels should therefore not be routinely used to select patients for PEG-IFN, nor for monitoring of therapy.

Development of a protocol for the quantitative determination of HBeAg using the Elecsys® HBeAg immunoassay

Loss of hepatitis 'e' antigen (HBeAg) in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B is associated with improved long-term clinical outcome and is defined as a goal of antiviral treatment by clinical practice guidelines. Recent studies suggest that baseline levels and on-treatment monitoring of HBeAg levels may identify patients most likely to respond to therapy. The aim of this study was the development of a protocol for the quantitative determination of HBeAg using the Elecsys® HBeAg immunoassay. The linear range of the Elecsys® HBeAg immunoassay was established using recombinant HBeAg and five different diluents. The assay was validated against the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) international standard serum. Linearity was demonstrated up to a cut-off index (COI) of 1000, independent of the diluent used. Optimal linearity was obtained using the Elecsys® Universal Diluent. Using the PEI reference standard, conversion factors were established as 4.50 COI for 1 PEIU/mL corresponding to 0.222 PEIU/mL for a COI of 1. Based on the results from these analyses, a simple algorithm for the quantitative measurement of HBeAg using the Elecsys® HBeAg immunoassay was developed. Using a simple algorithm with an initial 1:40 dilution, the Elecsys® HBeAg assay provides robust quantification of serum HBeAg in an easy-to-use and rapid system. The use of a commercially available, standardized diluent improves comparability between laboratories.

A personalized approach to optimize hepatitis B treatment in treatment-naive patients

In a treatment-naive patient with chronic hepatitis B, a personalized approach allows treatment efficacy to be optimized. Firstly, the selection of good candidates for therapy is crucial. Patients with chronic active hepatitis B--with relatively low levels of HBV DNA replication (<10(9) copies/ml) and relatively high alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels--are good candidates for therapy. By contrast, patients with chronic hepatitis B in the immunotolerance phase, who have high levels of HBV DNA and persistently normal ALT levels, as well as inactive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers with low HBV DNA and normal ALT levels do not have an indication for therapy as they are poor responders. Secondly, the characteristics of the patient (for example, gender, age, immune status, general health status and comorbidities), the characteristics of the liver disease (for example, presence of cirrhosis and liver function) and the characteristics of the virus (for example, genotype) are important when assessing the chance of success and when choosing the best therapeutic strategy (nucleoside/nucleotide analogue or interferon). Thirdly, during therapy, the antiviral effect--assessed by decrease in HBV DNA level--allows an individualized response-guided approach. In addition, quantification of HBsAg after 3-6 months of interferon therapy appears to be a good predictor of sustained virological response after treatment and HBsAg clearance. Continuing interferon therapy until week 48 is justified in patients with a significant decrease in HBsAg. Ongoing and future studies will provide useful information regarding prolonging interferon therapy beyond 48 weeks in some patients in order to increase efficacy, and also regarding the role of combination therapy with interferon and potent nucleoside/nucleotide analogues, such as entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

[Influence of treatment on long-term evolution of chronic hepatitis B]

The treatment of chronic hepatitis B is essentially based on the use of nucleoside or nucleotide analogues, which lead to viral suppression in the majority of cases. Viral suppression is associated with normal ALT values and progressive histological improvement of not only necroinflammatory lesions but also fibrosis. Regression of cirrhosis can be observed in severe cases. With the use of second-generation nucleoside or nucleotide analogues, the risk of mutation resistance is rare or inexistent. Finally, negativation and seroconversion of the HBs antigen can be observed in the medium-term. This seroconversion is usually associated with a decreased risk of complications and morbidity-mortality improvement.

The role of quantitative hepatitis B serology in the natural history and management of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a serious clinical problem worldwide. Advances in molecular technology have enabled the development of sensitive assays for the detection and quantification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleic acid and demonstrated a positive correlation between serum HBV DNA levels and disease progression. Assessment of specific serologic and virologic factors also plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis and effective management of individuals with CHB. Recent development of quantitative assays for intrahepatic HBV replicative intermediates, as well as hepatitis B e antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen, has spurred investigation into the relationship between these factors and response to antiviral therapy and disease progression. Recent findings from preclinical and clinical investigations indicate that these factors may have promise in identifying patients likely to respond to treatment. Additional work is needed to standardize and validate these assays before they can be considered to be of true diagnostic value. Further evaluation is needed to decide which will have the greatest clinical applicability.