Results of primary retinal detachment surgery: a prospective audit

Success Rates for Retinal Detachment Repair in Alberta: A Physician Learning Program Initiative

OBJECTIVE

To identify primary surgical success rates for retinal detachment repair in Alberta and compare functional outcomes of methods of repair.

METHODS

Data was retrospectively extracted from the Alberta Health Services Discharge Abstract Database and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System for all patients diagnosed with retinal detachment and vitreoretinal procedures during the 2008/09 to 2012/13 fiscal years.

RESULTS

Of the 5,433 surgeries for retinal detachment identified, 279 were excluded due to invalid provincial health numbers, unidentified procedure location, and/or treating physician other than an Alberta retina surgeon. The final analysis included 4,336 detachments in 4,020 patients. The average primary retinal detachment success rate was 84.9% (3,680/4,336). Primary success rates varied between vitrectomy only (84.9%, 2,149/2,532), vitrectomy and scleral buckle (85.5%, 818/957), and scleral buckle (84.4%, 702/832).

CONCLUSIONS

Alberta retina surgeons have an average primary success rate of 84.9% (3,680/4,336) for repair of retinal detachments. This result is in keeping with other published retinal detachment success rate studies.

The scleral buckling of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment under the surgical microscope

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To analyze the feasibility of performing scleral buckle under the surgical microscope without using the indirect ophthalmoscope.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data came from 342 eyes of 339 patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) that were suitable for scleral buckling. All surgeries were performed under the surgical microscope including examination and localization of retinal breaks, scleral buckling, and retinal cryotherapy.

RESULTS

During intraoperative examination, additional retinal breaks were found in 39 cases. Among 36 eyes in which a retinal break was not observed pre-operatively, 23 cases had retinal breaks detected during surgery. The anatomic success rate after one operation was 88.9% and the final success rate was 98.0%.

CONCLUSION

Scleral buckling of RRD with equatorial or pre-equatorial breaks can be easily done under the surgical microscope, which has the merits that the surgeon's view is a clear upright image, manipulations are simple, and good surgical results can be obtained.

Retinal detachment in East Africa

PURPOSE

To report the causes of retinal detachment in an African setting and the outcome after surgery.

DESIGN

Noncomparative interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 361 eyes in 345 patients.

METHODS

Data were collected from patients' case notes. A minimum of 2 months' follow-up was available for 254 eyes. Risk factors for poor anatomic or visual outcome were analyzed by logistic regression.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary anatomic success, which was defined as an attached retina at least 2 months after the initial surgery, without any additional interventions; final anatomic success, defined as an attached retina at least 2 months after the latest intervention; and visual outcome, defined as the corrected visual acuity at least 2 months after the last operation.

RESULTS

The macula was detached at presentation in 332 (91.9%) eyes. In 203 (56.2%) eyes, the retina had been detached for >1 month. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)-grade C1 or worse-was present in 63 (17.5%) eyes. Thirty eyes (8.3%) had giant retinal tears. Ninety-five patients (27.5%) were blind (<20/400 in the better eye) at presentation. The retina was successfully reattached with 1 operation in 186 (73.2%) eyes. The most frequent cause of primary failure was missed breaks or new breaks. The final anatomic success rate in eyes observed for at least 8 weeks after the last operation was 88.2%. Giant retinal tear and PVR were significant independent predictors of anatomic failure. In eyes with successfully reattached retinas, 63.9% achieved 20/200 vision or better. Among successfully reattached macula-off detachments, risk factors for a poor visual outcome (<20/200) were macular hole, duration of retinal detachment >1 month, and poor preoperative acuity. Of 74 blind patients with 2 months' follow-up, only 23 (31.1%) remained blind at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Retinal detachment is a treatable cause of blindness in Africa. Despite late presentation and complex pathology, surgical repair is frequently successful and often restores navigational vision. Greater emphasis should be given to the recognition and treatment of retinal detachment in regional training programs for ophthalmologists and primary eye care workers.

National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. II. Clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

This national study was designed to audit anatomical outcome and complications relating to primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. This paper presents success and complication rates, and examines variations in outcome.

METHODS

Sampling and recruitment details of this nationwide cross-sectional survey of 768 patients of 167 consultant ophthalmologists having their first operation for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment have been described. The main clinical outcomes detailed here are anatomical reattachment at 3 months after surgery and complications related to surgery. Consultants with a declared special interest in retinal surgery and able to perform pars plana vitrectomy were designated specialists for the analyses.

RESULTS

Overall reattachment rate with a single procedure was 77% (95% CI 73.9-80.2). There were significant differences in reattachment rates between specialists and non-specialists. Without allowing for case-mix, specialists had a reattachment rate of 82% (95% CI 77.9-85.7) with a single procedure and non-specialists 71% (95% CI 65.9-76.0). Allowing for case-mix, there was a significant difference between specialists and non-specialists for grade 2 detachments of 87% and 70% respectively (P < 0.0001). Analysing detachments by break type, the largest difference between specialists and non-specialists was observed for retinal detachments secondary to horseshoe tears, 80% and 68% respectively (P < 0.003). Specialists met the standards set for primary reattachment rates, while non-specialists did not. Over a third of patients had at least one complication reported at some point during the audit period.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences were seen in reattachment rates between specialists and non-specialists, overall and for specific subgroups of patients. This study provides relevant, robust and valid standards to enable all surgeons to audit their own surgical outcomes for primary retinal detachment repair in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments, identify common categories of failure and aim to improve results.

Triple cycle audit of primary retinal detachment surgery

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of increasing subspecialisation on the results of retinal detachment surgery in one city.

METHODS

Three audit cycles over a 10-year period when major subspecialisation and organisational changes were occurring. Retrospective case note reviews of all primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in each of the audit periods. Statistical analyses used contingency table/chi-square methods for comparing all three audits and Fisher's exact test/mean odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the Audit 1 vs Audit 3 comparison.

RESULTS

A marked improvement in success rates occurred: primary reattachment rose from 67% in Audit 1 to 87% in Audit 3 (P = 0.0004), and final success from 84% to 97% (P = 0.0003). There was a dramatic change in operative techniques over the same period: the percentage of vitrectomies increased from 1.5% in Audit 1 to 48% in Audit 3, while that of 'open' conventional procedures decreased from 78% to 32%. However, the improvement in anatomical success was not mirrored by an increase in the percentage of patients with 6/12 or better visual acuity postoperatively (55% in Audit 1, 49% in Audit 3; P = 0.34, mean odds ratio = 0.78; 95% CI 0.48-1.2). The percentage of patients with 6/18-6/36 post op visual acuity did increase in Audit 3 (18% in Audit 1; 29% in Audit 3; P = 0.03, mean odds ratio = 1.9; CI 1.1-3.3), and the percentage with 6/60 or worse decreased (27% in Audit 1, 20% in Audit 3; P = 0.26, mean odds ratio = 0.71; CI 0.40-1.2).

CONCLUSIONS

With increased subspecialisation there has been an increase in anatomical success, but the goal of 100% reattachment is still not being attained. There remains scope for further improvement in anatomical and functional outcomes.