Alternate repetition of short fore- and backfiltrations reduces convective albumin loss

Removal of Middle Molecules and Dialytic Albumin Loss: A Cross-over Study of Medium Cutoff and High-Flux Membranes with Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration

Key Points

HDF and MCO have shown greater clearance of middle-size uremic solutes in comparison with HF dialyzers; MCO has never been studied in HDF. MCO in HDF does not increase the clearance of B2M and results in a higher loss of albumin.

Background

Middle molecule removal and albumin loss have been studied in medium cutoff (MCO) membranes on hemodialysis (HD). It is unknown whether hemodiafiltration (HDF) with MCO membranes provides additional benefit. We aimed to compare the removal of small solutes and β 2-microglobulin (B2M), albumin, and total proteins between MCO and high-flux (HFX) membranes with both HD and HDF, respectively.

Methods

The cross-over study comprised 4 weeks, one each with postdilutional HDF using HFX (HFX-HDF), MCO (MCO-HDF), HD with HFX (HFX-HD), and MCO (MCO-HD). MCO and HFX differ with respect to several characteristics, including membrane composition, pore size distribution, and surface area (HFX, 2.5 m2; MCO, 1.7 m2). There were two study treatments per week, one after the long interdialytic interval and another midweek. Reduction ratios of vitamin B12, B2M, phosphate, uric acid, and urea corrected for hemoconcentration were computed. Dialysis albumin and total protein loss during the treatment were quantified from dialysate samples.

Results

Twelve anuric patients were studied (six female patients; 44±19 years; dialysis vintage 35.2±28 months). The blood flow was 369±23 ml/min, dialysate flow was 495±61 ml/min, and ultrafiltration volume was 2.8±0.74 L. No significant differences were found regarding the removal of B2M, vitamin B12, and water-soluble solutes between dialytic modalities and dialyzers. Albumin and total protein loss were significantly higher in MCO groups than HFX groups when compared with the same modality. HDF groups had significantly higher albumin and total protein loss than HD groups when compared with the same dialyzer. MCO-HDF showed the highest protein loss among all groups.

Conclusions

MCO-HD is not superior to HFX-HD and HFX-HDF for both middle molecule and water-soluble solute removal. Protein loss was more pronounced with MCO when compared with HFX on both HD and HDF modalities. MCO-HDF has no additional benefits regarding better removal of B2M but resulted in greater protein loss than MCO-HD.

Enhancement of solute clearance using pulsatile push-pull dialysate flow for the Quanta SC+: A novel clinic-to-home haemodialysis system

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The SC+ haemodialysis system developed by Quanta Dialysis Technologies is a small, easy-to-use dialysis system designed to improve patient access to self-care and home haemodialysis. A prototype variant of the standard SC+ device with a modified fluidic management system generating a pulsatile push-pull dialysate flow through the dialyser during use has been developed for evaluation. It was hypothesized that, as a consequence of the pulsatile push-pull flow through the dialyser, the boundary layers at the membrane surface would be disrupted, thereby enhancing solute transport across the membrane, modifying protein fouling and maintaining the surface area available for mass and fluid transport throughout the whole treatment, leading to solute transport (clearance) enhancement compared to normal haemodialysis (HD) operation.

METHODS

The pumping action of the SC+ system was modified by altering the sequence and timings of the valves and pumps associated with the flow balancing chambers that push and pull dialysis fluid to and from the dialyser. Using this unique prototype device, solute clearance performance was assessed across a range of molecular weights in two related series of laboratory bench studies. The first measured dialysis fluid moving across the dialyser membrane using ultrasonic flowmeters to establish the validity of the approach; solute clearance was subsequently measured using fluorescently tagged dextran molecules as surrogates for uraemic toxins. The second study used human blood doped with uraemic toxins collected from the spent dialysate of dialysis patients to quantify solute transport. In both, the performance of the SC+ prototype was assessed alongside reference devices operating in HD and pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) modes.

RESULTS

Initial testing with fluorescein-tagged dextran molecules (0.3 kDa, 4 kDa, 10 kDa and 20 kDa) established the validity of the experimental pulsatile push-pull operation in the SC+ system to enhance clearance and demonstrated a 10 to 15% improvement above the current HD mode used in clinic today. The magnitude of the observed enhancement compared favourably with that achieved using pre-dilution HDF with a substitution fluid flow rate of 60 mL/min (equivalent to a substitution volume of 14.4 L in a 4-hour session) with the same dialyser and marker molecules. Additional testing using human blood indicated a comparable performance to pre-dilution HDF; however, in contrast with HDF, which demonstrated a gradual decrease in solute removal, the clearance values using the pulsatile push-pull method on the SC+ system were maintained over the entire duration of treatment. Overall albumin losses were not different.

CONCLUSIONS

Results obtained using an experimental pulsatile push-pull dialysis flow configuration with an aqueous blood analogue and human blood ex vivo demonstrate an enhancement of solute transport across the dialyser membrane. The level of enhancement makes this approach comparable with that achieved using pre-dilution HDF with a substitution fluid flow rate of 60 mL/min (equivalent to a substitution volume of 14.4 L in a 4-hour session). The observed enhancement of solute transport is attributed to the disruption of the boundary layers at the fluid-membrane interface which, when used with blood, minimizes protein fouling and maintains the surface area.

Albumin handling in different hemodialysis modalities

Hypoalbuminemia is a major risk factor for morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. With increasing interest in highly permeable membranes and convective therapies to improve removal of middle molecules, transmembrane albumin loss increases accordingly. Currently, the acceptable upper limit of albumin loss for extracorporeal renal replacement therapies is unknown. In theory, any additional albumin loss should be minimized because it may contribute to hypoalbuminemia and adversely affect the patient's prognosis. However, hypoalbuminemia-associated mortality may be a consequence of inflammation and malnutrition, rather than low albumin levels per se. The purpose of this review is to give an overview of albumin handling with different extracorporeal renal replacement strategies. We conclude that the acceptable upper limit of dialysis-related albumin loss remains unknown. Whether enhanced middle molecule removal outweighs the potential adverse effects of increased albumin loss with novel highly permeable membranes and convective therapies is yet to be determined.

[Online hemodiafiltration: Practical aspects, safety and efficacy]

Purification of high molecular uremic toxins by conventional hemodialysis is limited. It remains associated with a high morbidity and excessively high mortality. Online hemodiafiltration using a high permeability hemodiafilter, an ultrapure dialysate, and which tends to maximize substitution volumes, provides a high efficiency and low bio-incompatibility renal supplementation. Regular use of online hemodiafiltration is associated with reduced morbidity (reduction of intradialytic hypotension episodes, improved blood pressure control, reduced inflammatory profile, better anemia correction and prevention of β₂-microglobulin-associated amyloidosis). Recently, several cohort studies have shown that hemodiafiltration with high substitution volume was associated with a significant reduction in mortality. Randomized studies have been conducted in Europe to confirm these facts. The high safety of online hemodiafiltration has been confirmed in clinical practice by prospective studies. Online hemodiafiltration has reached its full maturity phase and is expected to represent the new standard of renal replacement therapy.

Optimization of anti-infective dosing regimens during online haemodiafiltration

Online haemodiafiltration (HDF) is increasingly used in clinical practice as a routine intermittent dialysis modality. It is well known that renal impairment and renal replacement therapy can substantially affect the pharmacokinetic behaviour of several drugs. However, surprisingly few data are available on the need for specific dose adjustments during HDF. Due to convection, drug clearance may be increased during HDF as compared with standard haemodialysis. This may be of particular interest in patients undergoing anti-infective therapy, since under-dosing may compromise patient outcomes and promote the emergence of bacterial resistance. Drug clearance during HDF is determined by (i) dialysis characteristics, (ii) drug characteristics and (iii) patient characteristics. In this review, we will discuss these different determinants of drug clearance during HDF and advise on how to adjust the dose of antibacterial, antimycotic and antiviral agents in patients undergoing HDF. In addition, the possible added value of therapeutic drug monitoring is discussed. The review provides guidance for optimization of anti-infective dosing regimens in HDF patients.

Engineering perspective on the evolution of push/pull-based dialysis treatments

The incidence of kidney disease is rapidly increasing worldwide, and techniques and devices for treating end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have been evolving. Better outcomes achieved by convective treatment have encouraged the use of synthetic membranes with high water permeability in clinical setups, and high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) are now preferred forms of convective therapy in ESRD patients. Push/pull-based dialysis strategies have also been examined to increase convective mass transfer in ESRD patients. The push/pull technique uses the entire membrane as a forward filtration domain for a period of time. However, backfiltration must accompany the forward filtration to compensate for the fluid depletion resulting from the forward filtration, making it necessary to switch the membranes to a backfiltration domain. This paper attempts to describe the advancement of push/pull-based renal supportive treatments in terms of their technical description, hemodialytic efficacy including fluid management accuracy and applicability for clinical use. How the optimization of push and pull actions could translate into better convective efficiency will also be discussed in depth.

Evaluation of a new method for pulse push/pull hemodialysis: comparison with conventional hemodialysis

The repetition of forward and backward filtration during hemodialysis (HD) increases convective mass transfer, and thus, the authors devised a method of achieving cyclic repletion of ultrafiltration and backfiltration. Hemodialytic efficiencies of the developed unit are described. The devised method, named pulse push/pull hemodialysis (PPPHD), is based on the utilization of dual pulsation in a dialysate stream. Clearances of solutes with different molecular weights were determined, and in vivo hemodialytic performance was investigated in a canine renal failure model. Urea and creatinine reduction and albumin (ALB) loss were monitored, and the results obtained were compared with those of a conventional high-flux hemodialysis (CHD). Dialysis sessions were repeated eight times for PPPHD and six times for CHD by alternating PPPHD and CHD sessions in a single animal, which remained stable throughout the experiments. Urea and creatinine reductions for the PPPHD unit were 49.2 ± 2% and 44.3 ± 3.3%, respectively, which were slightly higher than those obtained for the CHD. Total protein and ALB levels were preserved by both methods. However, in vitro results revealed that PPPHD achieved significantly greater inulin clearance than CHD. The developed PPPHD unit facilitates repetitive filtration and improves convective mass transfer during HD, without the need for external replacement infusion.

Development of a New Method for Pulse Push/Pull Hemodialysis

Although hemodiafiltration is presumed to be a gold standard for higher convective therapy for kidney failure patients, the repetition of forward and backward filtration during hemodialysis increases the total filtration volume and convective clearance. Hence, the authors describe a new method of enhancing forward filtration and backfiltration. The devised method, named pulse push/pull hemodialysis (PPPHD), is based on the utilization of dual pulsation in a dialysate stream; namely, pulsatile devices in the dialysate stream both upstream (a dialysate pump) and downstream (an effluent pump) of the dialyzer. Fluid management accuracy of the unit was assessed using fresh bovine blood, and its hemodialytic performance was investigated in a canine renal failure model. Forward filtration rates during PPPHD were maintained at the levels of dialysate flow rates. Fluid balancing error was less than ±0.84% of total dialysate volume, when 97.4 ± 1.66L of pure dialysate was circulated for 4 hs. The animal remained stable without any complication. Urea and creatinine reductions were 56.9 ± 1.6 and 52.8 ± 2.3%, respectively, and albumin levels remained uniform throughout treatment. The devised PPPHD unit offers a simple, but efficient strategy of combined simultaneous diffusive and convective solute transport for ESRD patients, without the need for external replacement infusion.

[Physical principles of renal replacement therapy applied to end stage renal disease patients]

"Hemodialysis" is the generic term that refers to all forms of renal replacement therapy (RRT) able to restore periodically the "internal milieu" composition in end stage renal disease patients (ESRD). RRT includes several modalities (hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemodiafiltration) that induce basic physical principles (diffusion, convection, adsorption) via an exchange module (dialyser) and an electrolytic exchange solution (dialysis fluid). The cleansing property of the RRT depends on different factors: the treatment modality itself, the uremic toxin considered, patient's characteristic and the operational conditions (duration of treatment, session frequency, blood and dialysate flow rates). Solute instantaneous clearances reflect the dialyser's performances used in optimal conditions but not necessarily the body clearance. The effective solute body clearance is more difficult to assess in clinical practice since it includes some variables such as the treatment duration, the biological complexity of internal milieu and the variability of the patient/dialysis system interaction. The "dialysis adequacy" concept that governs the treatment efficacy in ESRD patients could not be reduced to the urea Kt/V ratio. It must integrate a selection of pertinent clinical and biological markers covering the complete spectrum of uremic abnormalities. Adequate knowledge of those basic physical principles that control the solute exchange in hemodialysis patient is highly recommended to any nephrologist who looks forward to improve treatment efficacy and reduce mortality in ESRD patients.

Beta2-microglobulin removal by extracorporeal renal replacement therapies

There is increasing evidence that end-stage renal disease patients with lower beta(2)-microglobulin plasma levels and patients on convective renal replacement therapy are at lower mortality risk. Therefore, an enhanced beta(2)-microglobulin removal by renal replacement procedures has to be regarded as a contribution to a more adequate dialysis therapy. In contrast to high-flux dialysis, low-flux hemodialysis is not qualified to eliminate substantial amounts of beta(2)-microglobulin. In hemodialysis using modern high-flux dialysis membranes, a beta(2)-microglobulin removal similar to that obtained in hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration can be achieved. Several of these high-flux membranes are protein-leaking, making them suitable only for hemodialysis due to a high albumin loss when used in more convective therapy procedures. On-line hemodiafiltration infusing large substitution fluid volumes represents the most efficient and innovative renal replacement therapy form. To maximize beta(2)-microglobulin removal, modifications of this procedure have been proposed. These modifications ensure safer operating conditions, such as mixed hemodiafiltration, or control albumin loss at maximum purification from beta(2)-microglobulin, such as mid-dilution hemodiafiltration, push/pull hemodiafiltration or programmed filtration. Whether these innovative hemodiafiltration options will become accepted in clinical routine use needs to be proven in future.

Protein-Leaking Membranes for Hemodialysis: A New Class of Membranes in Search of an Application?

A new class of membranes that leak protein has been developed for hemodialysis. These membranes provide greater clearances of low molecular weight proteins and small protein-bound solutes than do conventional high-flux dialysis membranes but at the cost of some albumin loss into the dialysate. Protein-leaking membranes have been used in a small number of clinical trials. The results of these trials suggest that protein-leaking membranes improve anemia correction, decrease plasma total homocysteine concentrations, and reduce plasma concentrations of glycosylated and oxidized proteins. However, it is not clear yet that routine use of protein-leaking membranes is warranted. Specific uremic toxins that are removed by protein-leaking membranes but not conventional high-flux membranes have not been identified. It is also unclear whether protein-leaking membranes offer benefits beyond those obtained with conventional high-flux membranes used in convective therapies, such as hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration. Finally, the amount of albumin loss that can be tolerated by hemodialysis patients in a long-term therapy has yet to be determined. Protein-leaking membranes offer a new approach to improving outcomes in hemodialysis, but whether their benefits will outweigh their disadvantages will require more basic and clinical research.

Beta-2 microglobulin in ESRD: an in-depth review

Beta-2 microglobulin is the most widely studied low-molecular-weight protein in end-stage renal disease. It is known to cause dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), by virtue of its retention when renal function fails, its deposition in tissues, its aggregation into fibrils, and its ability to become glycosylated. The onset of DRA may be protracted by the use of noncellulosic membranes, especially when high-volume hemodiafiltration is used in the treatment of renal failure. Adsorptive methods have been developed to improve the removal of beta-2 microglobulin. There seems to be a relative risk reduction in mortality when patients are treated with dialysis membranes that have a higher clearance of beta-2 microglobulin.

Albumin loss in on-line hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND

Based on the increased hydraulic permeability of the new high permeability polyethersulfone membrane, DIAPES HF-800, we investigated the kinetics and handling of albumin in high volume on-line hemodiafiltration (HDF).

METHODS

Seven patients on predilutional HDF were studied in two consecutive sessions. Blood flow rate and transmembrane pressure were continuously monitored. Spent dialysate was spilled at 20 ml/h every hour. Albumin was measured in blood and dialysate by immunonephelometry. Albumin and proteins adsorbed onto the dialyzer membrane were eluted after treatment with Triton X. Ultrafiltrates collected at 1 and 2 hours of treatment were pooled from different patients and incubated for 24 hours at 37 degrees C with bovine serum albumin (BSA). Total sulphydryl groups were evaluated using Ellmann's reagent [5, 5'-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)].

RESULTS

In all 7 patients, the total loss of albumin was 3.99 +/- 1.81 g, ranging between 1.09 and 6.82 g/session. Most albumin loss occurred in the first 60 min of pre-dilutional hemodiafiltration (1.92+0.83 g). There was no correlation between transmembrane pressure, urea clearance and the loss of albumin. Plasma water urea clearance values were stable over the treatment (234 +/- 14.3 ml/min). Plasma albumin concentration did not decrease during HDF sessions. Albumin adsorbed onto the dialyzers was 0.7 +/- 1.6 mg but the total amount of adsorbed proteins was much higher (130 + 90 mg). In addition, the ultrafiltrate collected during HDF sessions was able to induce oxidation of bovine serum albumin as measured by total protein sulfhydryl groups: bovine serum albumin incubated in the presence of ultrafiltrate collected at 1 hour had a sulfhydryl loss of 56.3 +/- 5.7% (p < 0.0001 vs control), and bovine serum albumin incubated with ultrafiltrate collected at 2 hours had a loss of 67.5 +/- 3.8% (p < 0.003 vs control).

CONCLUSION

The present study shows the high inter- and intra-patient variability of transmembrane passage of albumin in chronically uremic patients undergoing pre-dilutional HDF. Factors involved do not seem to be correlated to transmembrane pressure but rather to an interaction with the polymer surface. Albumin adsorption was minimal and was significantly lower than that of other plasma proteins. Albumin loss during HDF seemed to have no acute impact on plasma albumin. In addition, we demonstrated the presence of prooxidative compounds able to oxidize albumin, of which extracorporeal removal by HDF procedure could be beneficial for HD patients.

Push/pull hemodiafiltration: technical aspects and clinical effectiveness

Push/pull hemodiafiltration (HDF) is characterized by alternate repetition of filtration and backfiltration during hemodialysis with high-flux membrane. In the pressure-controlled push/pull (PC P/P) HDF system, which is the newest push/pull HDF system, there are about 25 repetitions of dilution and concentration of the blood while it passes through the hemodiafilter. Hence, the PC P/P is functionally close to the predilution mode of on-line HDF. In the PC P/P, body fluid is replaced usually by more than 120 L of dialysate during the 4 h treatment. In selecting a hemodiafilter for PC P/P, one must be certain that the blood flow channels in the hemodiafilter do not collapse by the positive pressure on the dialysate side in the backfiltration phase. Thus, the polyacrylonitrile hollow-fiber hemodiafilter and polysulfon hollow-fiber hemodiafilter are suitable for PC P/P. In the short term, PC P/P has been reported to be effective against joint pain, itchiness, insomnia, irritability, and restless leg syndrome experienced by hemodialysis patients. Midterm clinical effectiveness of PC P/P includes the requisite lowering of the erythropoietin dose and improvement in skin pigmentation. The albumin loss per treatment with the PC P/P was significantly lower than that with the conventional HDF approach when a protein-permeable membrane is used. In terms of the removal rate of prolactin, no significant difference was found between PC P/P and conventional HDF. On the other hand, the removal rates of myoglobin and beta2M, where molecular size was smaller than prolactin, was significantly greater with the PC P/P than with conventional HDF.

Dialysis: a 5-year perspective

The view of dialysis in the next 5 years will, by requirement, deal with ideas presently in the laboratories of industry and academics. The healthcare environment is heavily cost constrained and will likely only yield to more expensive therapies if one measures them in pharmacoeconomic terms and shows that they reduce the life costs for a patient with end-stage renal disease. The technologies of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis appear to be moving toward one another in terms of generating sterile pyrogen-free dialysis fluid online and moving toward customization of therapy for the individual patient. Sensors will provide closed loop feedback to modulate therapy prescription intradialytically for hemodialysis and on an exchange-to-exchange basis for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis will, in part, move back into the home as new, smart, and smaller equipment prospectively designed for that purpose becomes available. Renewed interest in vascular access will provide alternatives to the present shunt and fistula. The recognition of middle molecule toxicity may require selective removal of identified toxins by immunoadsorption. Patient, rather than physician, quality of life will largely dictate the acceptance of technical innovation over the next 5 years.