1
|
Alvites RD, Branquinho MV, Sousa AC, Lopes B, Sousa P, Mendonça C, Atayde LM, Maurício AC. Small Ruminants and Its Use in Regenerative Medicine: Recent Works and Future Perspectives. BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10030249. [PMID: 33810087 PMCID: PMC8004958 DOI: 10.3390/biology10030249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary Small ruminants such as sheep and goats have been increasingly used as animal models due to their dimensions, physiology and anatomy identical to those of humans. Their low costs, ease of accommodation, great longevity and easy handling make them advantageous animals to be used in a wide range of research work. Although there is already a lot of scientific literature describing these species, their use still lacks some standardization. The purpose of this review is to summarize the general principles related to the use of small ruminants as animal models for scientific research. Abstract Medical and translational scientific research requires the use of animal models as an initial approach to the study of new therapies and treatments, but when the objective is an exploration of translational potentialities, classical models fail to adequately mimic problems in humans. Among the larger animal models that have been explored more intensely in recent decades, small ruminants, namely sheep and goats, have emerged as excellent options. The main advantages associated to the use of these animals in research works are related to their anatomy and dimensions, larger than conventional laboratory animals, but very similar to those of humans in most physiological systems, in addition to their low maintenance and feeding costs, tendency to be docile, long life expectancies and few ethical complications raised in society. The most obvious disadvantages are the significant differences in some systems such as the gastrointestinal, and the reduced amount of data that limits the comparison between works and the validation of the characterization essays. Despite everything, recently these species have been increasingly used as animal models for diseases in different systems, and the results obtained open doors for their more frequent and advantageous use in the future. The purpose of this review is to summarize the general principles related to the use of small ruminants as animal models, with a focus on regenerative medicine, to group the most relevant works and results published recently and to highlight the potentials for the near future in medical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Damásio Alvites
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA) da Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal; (R.D.A.); (M.V.B.); (A.C.S.); (B.L.); (P.S.); (C.M.); (L.M.A.)
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Mariana Vieira Branquinho
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA) da Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal; (R.D.A.); (M.V.B.); (A.C.S.); (B.L.); (P.S.); (C.M.); (L.M.A.)
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Catarina Sousa
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA) da Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal; (R.D.A.); (M.V.B.); (A.C.S.); (B.L.); (P.S.); (C.M.); (L.M.A.)
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Bruna Lopes
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA) da Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal; (R.D.A.); (M.V.B.); (A.C.S.); (B.L.); (P.S.); (C.M.); (L.M.A.)
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Patrícia Sousa
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA) da Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal; (R.D.A.); (M.V.B.); (A.C.S.); (B.L.); (P.S.); (C.M.); (L.M.A.)
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Carla Mendonça
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA) da Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal; (R.D.A.); (M.V.B.); (A.C.S.); (B.L.); (P.S.); (C.M.); (L.M.A.)
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Miguel Atayde
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA) da Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal; (R.D.A.); (M.V.B.); (A.C.S.); (B.L.); (P.S.); (C.M.); (L.M.A.)
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Colette Maurício
- Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA) da Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal; (R.D.A.); (M.V.B.); (A.C.S.); (B.L.); (P.S.); (C.M.); (L.M.A.)
- Departamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +351-919-071-286 or +351-220-428-000
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Velázquez-Delgado PI, Gutierrez-Blanco E, Torres-Acosta FDJ, Ortega-Pacheco A, Aguilar-Caballero AJ, Dzikiti BT. Comparison of Propofol or Isoflurane Anesthesia Maintenance, Combined with a Fentanyl-Lidocaine-Ketamine Constant-Rate Infusion in Goats Undergoing Abomasotomy. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11020492. [PMID: 33668487 PMCID: PMC7918233 DOI: 10.3390/ani11020492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary General anesthesia in small ruminants is still a challenge under field conditions. Propofol is an injectable short-acting anesthetic used to provide induction and/or anesthesia maintenance. Isoflurane is the inhaled anesthetic more widely used for providing general anesthesia; however, it requires an expensive equipment for its administration, and high doses may produce environmental pollution. Both anesthetics produce dose-related cardiovascular depressant effects. This study aimed to compare the effects of propofol or isoflurane, combined with a constant-rate infusion of fentanyl–lidocaine–ketamine (total [total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA)] and partial intravenous anesthesia [PIVA], respectively) in goats undergoing abomasotomy. Our results showed that both TIVA and PIVA protocols produced a satisfactory quality of anesthesia during surgery, with minimal changes in cardiopulmonary parameters. However, recovery from anesthesia induced by propofol fentanyl–lidocaine–ketamine might be of poor quality. Abstract This study aimed to compare, first, the anesthetic and cardiopulmonary effects of propofol or isoflurane anesthetic maintenance in goats receiving a fentanyl–lidocaine–ketamine infusion undergoing abomasotomy and, secondly, to compare the quality of the recovery from anesthesia. Two groups were used: propofol (TIVA) and isoflurane (PIVA). Goats were premedicated with fentanyl (10 μg/kg intravenously [IV]), lidocaine (2 mg/kg, IV), and ketamine (1.5 mg/kg, IV). Anesthesia was induced with propofol and maintenance consisted of fentanyl (10 μg/kg/h, IV), lidocaine (50 μg/kg/min, IV), and ketamine (50 μg/kg/min, IV) as constant-rate infusions (CRIs), combined with either CRI of propofol at initial dose of 0.3 mg/kg/min, IV (TIVA), or isoflurane with initial end-tidal (FE’Iso) concentration of 1.2% partial intravenous anesthesia (PIVA). The mean effective propofol dose for maintenance was 0.44 ± 0.07 mg/kg/min, while the mean FE’Iso was 0.81 ± 0.2%. Higher systolic arterial pressure (SAP) values were observed in total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) during some time points. Recovery was smooth in PIVA, while restlessness, vocalizations, and paddling were observed in TIVA. Both protocols produced a satisfactory quality of anesthesia during surgery, with minimal impact on cardiopulmonary function. Nevertheless, recovery after anesthesia in TIVA might be of poor quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perla I. Velázquez-Delgado
- Department of Animal Health and Preventive Medicine, Autonomous University of Yucatan, 97000 Merida, Mexico; (P.I.V.-D.); (F.d.J.T.-A.); (A.O.-P.); (A.J.A.-C.)
| | - Eduardo Gutierrez-Blanco
- Department of Animal Health and Preventive Medicine, Autonomous University of Yucatan, 97000 Merida, Mexico; (P.I.V.-D.); (F.d.J.T.-A.); (A.O.-P.); (A.J.A.-C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +52-99-9942-3200
| | - Felipe de J. Torres-Acosta
- Department of Animal Health and Preventive Medicine, Autonomous University of Yucatan, 97000 Merida, Mexico; (P.I.V.-D.); (F.d.J.T.-A.); (A.O.-P.); (A.J.A.-C.)
| | - Antonio Ortega-Pacheco
- Department of Animal Health and Preventive Medicine, Autonomous University of Yucatan, 97000 Merida, Mexico; (P.I.V.-D.); (F.d.J.T.-A.); (A.O.-P.); (A.J.A.-C.)
| | - Armando J. Aguilar-Caballero
- Department of Animal Health and Preventive Medicine, Autonomous University of Yucatan, 97000 Merida, Mexico; (P.I.V.-D.); (F.d.J.T.-A.); (A.O.-P.); (A.J.A.-C.)
| | - Brighton T. Dzikiti
- Department of Large Animal Clinical Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, Ross University, KN0111 Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gurji HA, White DW, Hoxha B, Sun J, Harbor JP, Schulz DR, Williams AG, Olivencia-Yurvati AH, Mallet RT. Pyruvate-enriched resuscitation: metabolic support of post-ischemic hindlimb muscle in hypovolemic goats. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2014; 239:240-9. [PMID: 24414481 DOI: 10.1177/1535370213514329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Tourniquet-imposed ischemia-reperfusion of extremities generates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS), which can disrupt intermediary metabolism and ATP production. This study tested the hypothesis that fluid resuscitation with pyruvate, a natural antioxidant and metabolic fuel, ameliorates the deleterious effects of ischemia-reperfusion on intermediary metabolism in skeletal muscle. Anesthetized male goats (∼25 kg) were bled to a mean arterial pressure of 48 ± 1 mmHg and then subjected to 90 min hindlimb ischemia with a tourniquet and femoral crossclamp, followed by 4-h reperfusion. Lactated Ringers (LR) or pyruvate Ringers (PR) was infused intravenous for 90 min, from 30 min ischemia to 30 min reperfusion, to deliver 0.05 mmol kg(-1) min(-1) lactate or pyruvate. Time controls (TC) underwent neither hemorrhage nor hindlimb ischemia. Lipid peroxidation product 8-isoprostane, RONS-sensitive aconitase and creatine kinase activities, antioxidant superoxide dismutase activity, and phosphocreatine phosphorylation potential ([PCr]/[{Cr}{P(i)}]), an index of tissue energy state, were measured in reperfused gastrocnemius at 90 min resuscitation (n = 6 all groups) and 3.5 h post-resuscitation (n = 8 TC, 9 LR, 10 PR). PR more effectively than LR suppressed 8-isoprostane formation, prevented inactivation of aconitase and creatine kinase, doubled superoxide dismutase activity, and augmented [PCr]/([Cr][P(i)]). Pyruvate-enriched Ringer's is metabolically superior to Ringer's lactate for fluid resuscitation of tourniqueted muscle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunaid A Gurji
- Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107-2699, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|