Lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone for newly diagnosed primary plasma cell leukemia

Multiple myeloma clinical trials exclude patients with the highest-risk disease: a systematic review of trial exclusion criteria

Patients with certain subsets of multiple myeloma continue to have poor outcomes and are in need of novel treatment approaches. Strict eligibility criteria for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limit access to clinical trials and limit the external validity of trial results for these patients. We systematically reviewed RCTs in newly diagnosed myeloma from 2006 to 2023 to ascertain the prevalence of 12 key exclusion criteria and trends over time. 80 RCTs were included. Exclusion criteria included: age in 43 (51%) trials; projected life expectancy in 20 (24%); performance status in 74 (87%); non-secretory and/or oligosecretory disease in 47 (55%), hepatic function in 64 (79%), renal function in 63 (74%), hematological thresholds in 50 (59%), prior malignancy in 68 (80%), and neuropathy in 50 (59%). For 53 trials which had detailed exclusion criteria available, plasma cell leukemia was excluded in 21 (40%), extramedullary disease in 5 (9%) and CNS disease in 13 (25%). The percentage of studies invoking each of these exclusion criteria did not significantly improve over time on univariate regression analysis, and exclusion criteria relating to neuropathy have worsened. The restrictive eligibility criteria of most myeloma RCTs perpetuate a cycle where limited data exists to treat challenging myeloma subtypes.

Poor outcome despite modern treatments: A retrospective study of 99 patients with primary and secondary plasma cell leukemia

BACKGROUND

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare monoclonal gammopathy, associated with short survival. Because of its very low incidence, only a few cohorts have been reported and thus, information on this disease is scarce. The goal of this study was to better understand the clinical features, prognostic factors, and efficacy of modern treatments in both primary PCL (pPCL) and secondary PCL (sPCL).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, multicenter study of patients diagnosed with PCL, defined as circulating plasma cells ≥20% of total leukocytes and/or ≥2 × 109/L.

RESULTS

We identified 99 eligible PCL patients, of whom 33 were pPCL and 66 were sPCL. The median progression-free survival (PFS) to frontline treatment and overall survival (OS) were, respectively, 4.8 (95% CI, 0.4-9.2) and 18.3 months (95% CI, 0.0-39.0) for pPCL and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.5-1.1) and 1.2 months (95% CI, 0.9-1.5) for sPCL (both p < 0.001). We observed no improvement in OS over time (2005-2012 vs. 2013-2020, p = 0.629 for pPCL and p = 0.329 for sPCL). Finally, our data suggested that sPCL originates from a high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) population with a short OS (median 30.2 months), early relapse after stem cell transplant (median 11.9 months) and a high proportion of patients with multiple cytogenetic abnormalities (36% with ≥2 abnormalities).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is one of the largest PCL cohorts reported. We are also the first to investigate characteristics of MM before its transformation into sPCL and demonstrate that high-risk biologic features already present at the time of MM diagnosis. Moreover, our data highlights the lack of improvement in PCL survival in recent years and the urgent need for better treatment options.

Current Status on Management of Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia

PURPOSEOF REVIEW

Plasma Cell Leukemia (PCL) is a very rare and highly aggressive form of plasma cell dyscrasia. This review seeks to evaluate the outcomes of PCL in the context of combination novel agent therapy and stem cell transplant (SCT) protocols.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnostic criteria for PCL have now evolved to include patients with 5% circulating PC. While management remains challenging, the incorporation of novel agent-based induction regimen has significantly improved early mortality and reduced attrition of patients proceeding to SCT. In recent prospective clinical trials, patients with PCL demonstrated an overall response rates of 69% to 86%, with progression-free and overall survival ranging from 13.8 to 15.5 months and 24.8 to 36.3 months, respectively. B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors, such as venetoclax present a targeted intervention opportunity for patients with PCL with t(11;14). Dedicated clinical trials tailored to PCL are crucial, integrating newer therapies in the frontline setting to further optimize responses and enhance overall outcomes.

Clinical and cytogenetic characteristics of primary and secondary plasma cell leukemia under the new IMWG definition criteria: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder, exhibiting a more unfavorable prognosis than multiple myeloma. PCL is classified into pPCL and sPCL. Recently, the IMWG has recommended new PCL definition criteria, which require the presence of ≥5% circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears. Due to its low incidence, research on pPCL and sPCL is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study and analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data of pPCL and sPCL patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival distributions were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

This is a small cohort comprising 23 pPCL and 9 sPCL patients. Notably, sPCL patients showed a higher incidence of extramedullary infiltration and a higher percentage of bone marrow plasma cells (p = 0.015 and 0.025, respectively). Although no significant difference was found between the two groups in OS and PFS, a trend emerged suggesting a superior survival outcome for pPCL patients, with a higher cumulative 1-year PFS rate (38.3% vs. 13.3%) and a lower early mortality rate (mortality rate at 3 months: 15% vs. 33%). We also suggested that pPCL patients carrying t(11;14) may have a longer median survival time than individuals with other cytogenetic abnormalities, but this was not confirmed due to the small sample size.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed clinical and cytogenetic features of pPCL and sPCL patients according to the new diagnostic criteria. The findings suggested a generally better prognosis for pPCL than sPCL and the likelihood of t(11;14) translocation acting as a favorable prognostic factor in pPCL. It is important to note that our study had a limited sample size, which may lead to bias. We hope well-designed studies can be conducted to provide more results.

Treatment of primary plasma cell leukaemia with carfilzomib and lenalidomide-based therapy (EMN12/HOVON-129): final analysis of a non-randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Primary plasma cell leukaemia is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder with a poor prognosis. The aim of the EMN12/HOVON-129 study was to improve the outcomes of patients with primary plasma cell leukaemia by incorporating carfilzomib and lenalidomide in induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy.

METHODS

The EMN12/HOVON-129 study is a non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study conducted at 19 academic centres and hospitals in seven European countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Italy, Norway, The Netherlands, and the UK) for previously untreated patients with primary plasma cell leukaemia aged 18 years or older. Inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed primary plasma cell leukaemia (defined as >2 ×109 cells per L circulating monoclonal plasma cells or plasmacytosis >20% of the differential white cell count) and WHO performance status 0-3. Patients aged 18-65 years (younger patients) and 66 years or older (older patients) were treated in age-specific cohorts and were analysed separately. Younger patients were treated with four 28-day cycles of carfilzomib (36 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16), lenalidomide (25 mg orally on days 1-21), and dexamethasone (20 mg orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23). Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) induction was followed by double autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), four cycles of KRd consolidation, and then maintenance with carfilzomib (27 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 for the first 12 28-day cycles, and then 56 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 in all subsequent cycles) and lenalidomide (10 mg orally on days 1-21) until progression. Patients who were eligible for allogeneic HSCT, could also receive a single autologous HSCT followed by reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic HSCT and then carfilzomib-lenalidomide maintenance. Older patients received eight cycles of KRd induction followed by maintenance therapy with carfilzomib and lenalidomide until progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The primary analysis population was the intention-to-treat population, irrespective of the actual treatment received. Data from all participants who received any study drug were included in the safety analyses. The trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl (until June 2022) and https://trialsearch.who.int/ as NTR5350; recruitment is complete and this is the final analysis.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 23, 2015, and Aug 5, 2021, 61 patients were enrolled and received KRd induction treatment (36 patients aged 18-65 years [20 (56%) were male and 16 (44%) female], and 25 aged ≥66 years [12 (48%) were male and 13 (52%) female]). With a median follow-up of 43·5 months (IQR 27·7-67·8), the median progression-free survival was 15·5 months (95% CI 9·4-38·4) for younger patients. For older patients, median follow-up was 32·0 months (IQR 24·7-34·6), and median progression-free survival was 13·8 months (95% CI 9·2-35·5). Adverse events were most frequently observed directly after treatment initiation, with infections (two of 36 (6%) younger patients and eight of 25 (32%) older patients) and respiratory events (two of 36 [6%] younger patients and four of 25 [16%] older patients) being the most common grade 3 or greater events during the first four KRd cycles. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 26 (72%) of 36 younger patients and in 19 (76%) of 25 older patients, with infections being the most common. Treatment-related deaths were reported in none of the younger patients and three (12%) of the older patients (two infections and one unknown cause of death).

INTERPRETATION

Carfilzomib and lenalidomide-based therapy provides improved progression-free survival compared with previously published data. However, results remain inferior in primary plasma cell leukaemia compared with multiple myeloma, highlighting the need for new studies incorporating novel immunotherapies.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Society, Celgene (a BMS company), and AMGEN.

Improved survival of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia with VRd or daratumumab-based quadruplets: A multicenter study by the Greek myeloma study group

We evaluated the efficacy and prognostic impact of bortezomib-lenalidomide triplet (VRd) or daratumumab-based quadruplets (DBQ) versus previous anti-myeloma therapies, that is, bortezomib standard combinations (BSC) or conventional chemotherapy (CT), in a large cohort of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), including those fulfilling the revised diagnostic criteria, that is, circulating plasma cells (cPCS): ≥5%; 110 pPCL patients (M/F: 51/59; median age 65 years, range: 44-86) out of 3324 myeloma patients (3%), registered in our database between 2001 and 2021, were studied; 37% had cPCS 5%-19%; 89% received novel combinations including DBQ (21%), VRd (16%) and BSC (52%); 35% underwent autologous stem cell transplantation. 83% achieved objective responses. Treatment with VRd/DBQ strongly correlated with a higher complete response rate (41% vs. 17%; p = .008). After a median follow-up of 51 months (95% CI: 45-56), 67 patients died. Early mortality was 3.5%. Progression-free survival was 16 months (95% CI: 12-19.8), significantly longer in patients treated with VRd/DBQ versus BSC/CT (25 months, 95% CI: 13.5-36.5 vs. 13 months 95% CI: 9-16.8; p = .03). Median overall survival (OS) was 29 months (95% CI: 19.6-38.3), significantly longer in patients treated with VRd/DBQ versus BSC/CT (not reached vs. 20 months, 95% CI: 14-26; 3-year OS: 70% vs. 32%, respectively; p < .001; HzR: 3.88). In the multivariate analysis VRd/DBQ therapy, del17p(+) and PLT <100.000/μL, independently predicted OS (p < .05). Our study has demonstrated that in the real-world setting, treatment with VRd/DBQ induces deep and durable responses and is a strong prognostic factor for OS representing currently the best therapeutic option for pPCL.

How We Manage Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Circulating Tumor Cells

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Careful evaluation of peripheral blood for the presence of circulating plasma cells by morphologic assessment or by flow cytometric analysis is an essential component of the diagnostic workup in all patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) to timely differentiate between MM and primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), which is the most aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia. The improvement in survival over time is more modest in pPCL, compared with what has been achieved in MM. pPCL is currently defined by the presence of ≥ 5% circulating plasma cells. However, this cutoff is now challenged by new data, from three large cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed MM, showing that a threshold of 2% circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by flow cytometry can be used to identify a subset of patients with ultra-high-risk MM with comparable prognosis as patients with pPCL. These patients may benefit from more intensified first-line therapies, or from enrollment into specific clinical trials, designed for ultra-high-risk MM and pPCL. Apart from differentiating MM from pPCL, the quantification of CTCs is also useful for risk stratification in MM. The detection of CTCs above a threshold of 0.01%-0.07% (much lower than the threshold to define pPCL) appears to be an independent predictor of poor clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed MM. Additional studies, including transplant-ineligible patients or with incorporation of novel immunotherapies, are needed to identify a definitive prognostic CTC cutoff. The next step will be the incorporation of CTC detection into existing staging systems to improve risk stratification and treatment personalization.

The Current State of Knowledge About Evolution of Multiple Myeloma to Plasma Cell Leukemia

Plasma cell leukemia is a rare form of multiple myeloma (MM). In contrast to de novo primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), which is very uncommon presentation of MM, there is increasing frequency of transformation to secondary plasma cell leukemia (sPCL) with increasing survival of patients (MM). The molecular basis of sPCL remains poorly understood sPCL is particularly aggressive and is associated with an extremely poor prognosis, constituting a major unmet medical need. High-quality data in sPCL regarding presentation, treatment and outcomes is limited. Herein we review the current state of knowledge on sPCL diagnostics, molecular biology, clinical characteristics, prognosis and reported treatment outcomes and the emergence of the new therapeutic strategies.

More Than 2% of Circulating Tumor Plasma Cells Defines Plasma Cell Leukemia-Like Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is the most aggressive monoclonal gammopathy. It was formerly characterized by ≥ 20% circulating plasma cells (CTCs) until 2021, when this threshold was decreased to ≥ 5%. We hypothesized that primary PCL is not a separate clinical entity, but rather that it represents ultra-high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) characterized by elevated CTC levels.

METHODS

We assessed the levels of CTCs by multiparameter flow cytometry in 395 patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM to establish a cutoff for CTCs that identifies the patients with ultra-high-risk PCL-like MM. We tested the cutoff on 185 transplant-eligible patients with MM and further validated on an independent cohort of 280 transplant-ineligible patients treated in the GEM-CLARIDEX trial. The largest published real-world cohort of patients with primary PCL was used for comparison of survival. Finally, we challenged the current 5% threshold for primary PCL diagnosis.

RESULTS

Newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with MM with 2%-20% CTCs had significantly shorter progression-free survival (3.1 v 15.6 months; P < .001) and overall survival (14.6 v 33.6 months; P = .023) than patients with < 2%. The 2% cutoff proved to be applicable also in transplant-eligible patients with MM and was successfully validated on an independent cohort of patients from the GEM-CLARIDEX trial. Most importantly, patients with 2%-20% CTCs had comparable dismal outcomes with primary PCL. Moreover, after revealing a low mean difference between flow cytometric and morphologic evaluation of CTCs, we showed that patients with 2%-5% CTCs have similar outcomes as those with 5%-20% CTCs.

CONCLUSION

Our study uncovers that ≥ 2% CTCs is a biomarker of hidden primary PCL and supports the assessment of CTCs by flow cytometry during the diagnostic workup of MM.

Primary plasma cell leukemia in Latin America: demographic, clinical, and prognostic characteristics. A study of GELAMM group

Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is an infrequent and aggressive plasma cell disorder. The prognosis is still very poor, and the optimal treatment remains to be established. A retrospective, multicentric, international observational study was performed. Patients from 9 countries of Latin America (LATAM) with a diagnosis of pPCL between 2012 and 2020 were included. 72 patients were included. Treatment was based on thalidomide in 15%, proteasome inhibitors (PI)-based triplets in 38% and chemotherapy plus IMIDs and/or PI in 29%. The mortality rate at 3 months was 30%. The median overall survival (OS) was 18 months. In the multivariate analysis, frontline PI-based triplets, chemotherapy plus IMIDs and/or PI therapy, and maintenance were independent factors of better OS. In conclusion, the OS of pPCL is still poor in LATAM, with high early mortality. PI triplets, chemotherapy plus IMIDs, and/or PI and maintenance therapy were associated with improved survival.

Validation of the revised diagnostic criteria for primary plasma cell leukemia by the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party

The International Myeloma Working Group has recently revised the diagnostic criteria for primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) to circulating plasma cells (CPCs) ≥ 5% in a peripheral blood smear. The present study validated new criteria in patients with multiple myeloma or PCL diagnosed using the previous diagnostic criteria, who were administered immunomodulatory drugs or proteasome inhibitors as induction therapy. We analyzed the medical records of 1357 patients from eight hospitals in South Korea. The median age of the all patients was 64 years, and 187 (13.8%) had CPCs at diagnosis. Only 79 (5.8%) of the patients had ≥ 5% CPCs. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with CPCs ≥ 5% and ≥ 20% was similar, but had significantly inferior median progression-free survival (PFS) and median OS than those with CPCs < 5% (13.1 vs. 21.5 months, P < 0.001, and 21.5 vs. 60.9 months, P < 0.001, respectively). Primary PCL diagnosed using the revised criteria presented with higher total calcium levels and serum creatinine levels, lower platelet counts and frequent organomegaly and plasmacytoma at diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the presence of plasmacytoma and elevated serum β2-microglobulin were significantly associated with OS in primary PCL. In conclusion, the revised criterion of CPCs ≥ 5% in a peripheral blood smear is appropriate for PCL diagnosis.

Identification of High-Risk Multiple Myeloma With a Plasma Cell Leukemia-Like Transcriptomic Profile

PURPOSE

Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is an aggressive subtype of multiple myeloma, which is distinguished from newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) on the basis of the presence of ≥ 20% circulating tumor cells (CTCs). A molecular marker for pPCL is currently lacking, which could help identify NDMM patients with high-risk PCL-like disease, despite not having been recognized as such clinically.

METHODS

A transcriptomic classifier for PCL-like disease was bioinformatically constructed and validated by leveraging information on baseline CTC levels, tumor burden, and tumor transcriptomics from 154 patients with NDMM included in the Cassiopeia or HO143 trials and 29 patients with pPCL from the EMN12/HO129 trial. Its prognostic value was assessed in an independent cohort of 2,139 patients with NDMM from the HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4, HOVON-87/NMSG-18, EMN02/HO95, MRC-IX, Total Therapy 2, Total Therapy 3, and MMRF CoMMpass studies.

RESULTS

High CTC levels were associated with the expression of 1,700 genes, independent of tumor burden (false discovery rate < 0.05). Of these, 54 genes were selected by leave-one-out cross-validation to construct a transcriptomic classifier representing PCL-like disease. This not only demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% to identify pPCL in the validation cohort but also classified 10% of NDMM tumors as PCL-like. PCL-like MM transcriptionally and cytogenetically resembled pPCL, but presented with significantly lower CTC levels and tumor burden. Multivariate analyses in NDMM confirmed the significant prognostic value of PCL-like status in the context of Revised International Staging System stage, age, and treatment, regarding both progression-free (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.07) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.50).

CONCLUSION

pPCL was identified on the basis of a specific tumor transcriptome, which was also present in patients with high-risk NDMM, despite not being clinically leukemic. Incorporating PCL-like status into current risk models in NDMM may improve prognostic accuracy.

Update on primary plasma cell leukemia

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and highly aggressive plasma cell neoplasm developing in 0.5?4% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The diagnostic criteria were recently revised from 20% to ≥5% of circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears. PCL is classified as primary or secondary; primary PCL is when it presents in patients with no MM. Primary PCL shows clinical and laboratory features at presentation that differ from MM and exhibits a dismal prognosis even with the use of effective agents against MM. Therefore, intensive chemotherapy should be initiated immediately after diagnosis, and autologous stem cell transplantation is recommended for transplant-eligible patients. Maintenance therapy after transplantation may reduce the rate of early relapses. We reviewed the definitions of PCL, revised diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and appropriate initial treatments for primary PCL.

Complete response following treatment of plasma cell leukemia with venetoclax and dexamethasone: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare but aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM) with a poor prognosis. Due to the limited number of prospective clinical trials studying PCL, treatment options are often extrapolated from data available for the treatment of MM. Venetoclax has recently demonstrated antimyeloma activity in patients with relapsed/refractory MM carrying the t(11;14) translocation. However, few cases have reported the analogous efficacy of venetoclax in PCL.

CASE REPORT

A 64-year-old Caucasian male developed relapsed PCL despite treatment with hyperCD (hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone) and Dara-KRd (daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone). Due to the refractory nature of his disease and the presence of a t(11:14) translocation, the patient was subsequently initiated on venetoclax 400 mg daily and dexamethasone 4 mg once weekly.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient achieved a complete response by International Myeloma Working Group criteria three months after initiating venetoclax-dexamethasone, including a repeat bone marrow biopsy that showed no abnormal plasma cells. He successfully underwent consolidation with melphalan-based autologous stem cell transplantation. He remains disease-free 9 months after venetoclax initiation.

DISCUSSION

Combination all-oral therapy with venetoclax and dexamethasone can induce deep hematologic responses in patients with relapsed/refractory PCL carrying the t(11;14) translocation.

The Cytogenetic Profile of Primary and Secondary Plasma Cell Leukemia: Etiopathogenetic Perspectives, Prognostic Impact and Clinical Relevance to Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma with Differential Circulating Clonal Plasma Cells

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia that may appear as de-novo leukemia (pPCL) or on the basis of a pre-existing multiple myeloma (MM), called secondary plasma cell leukemia (sPCL). In this prospective study, we have applied a broad panel of FISH probes in 965 newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and 44 PCL cases of both types to reveal the particular cytogenetic differences among the three plasma cell dyscrasias. In order to evaluate the frequency and patterns of clonal evolution, the same FISH panel was applied both at diagnosis and at the time of first relapse for 81 relapsed MM patients and both at MM diagnosis and during sPCL transformation for the 19 sPCL cases described here. pPCL was characterized by frequent MYC translocations and t(11;14) with a 11q13 breakpoint centered on the MYEOV gene, not commonly seen in MM. sPCL had a higher number of FISH abnormalities and was strongly associated with the presence of del(17p13), either acquired at the initial MM stage or as a newly acquired lesion upon leukemogenesis in the context of the apparent clonal evolution observed in sPCL. In clinical terms, sPCL showed a shorter overall survival than pPCL with either standard or high-risk (t(4;14) and/or t(14;16) and/or del(17p13) and/or ≥3 concomitant aberrations) abnormalities (median 5 months vs. 21 and 11 months respectively, p < 0.001), suggesting a prognostic stratification based on cytogenetic background. These observations proved relevant in the NDMM setting, where higher levels of circulating plasma cells (CPCs) were strongly associated with high-risk cytogenetics (median frequency of CPCs: 0.11% of peripheral blood nucleated cells for high-risk vs. 0.007% for standard-risk NDMM, p < 0.0001). Most importantly, the combined evaluation of CPCs (higher or lower than a cut-off of 0.03%), together with patients’ cytogenetic status, could be used for an improved prognostic stratification of NDMM patients.

Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) has a consistently ominous prognosis, even after progress in the last decades. PCL deserves a prompt identification to start the most effective treatment for this ultra-high-risk disease. The aim of this position paper is to revisit the diagnosis of PCL according to the presence of circulating plasma cells in patients otherwise meeting diagnostic criteria of multiple myeloma. We could identify two retrospective series where the question about what number of circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood should be used for defining PCL. The presence of ≥5% circulating plasma cells in patients with MM had a similar adverse prognostic impact as the previously defined PCL. Therefore, PCL should be defined by the presence of 5% or more circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears in patients otherwise diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma.

Leucocytoclastic Vasculitis, Cryoglobulinemia, or Plasma Cell Leukemia: A Diagnostic Conundrum

Plasma cell leukemia is rare and could be life-threatening. Even rarer and equally life-threatening is cryoglobulinemia. Both of them occurring together paints a grim clinical picture. We present the case of a 63-year-old male with plasma cell leukemia complicated by cryoglobulinemia with skin lesions. The report briefly reviews the clinical and diagnostic characteristics of plasma cell leukemia and well as available treatment options. It also highlights the need to consider non-chemotherapy-based regimens and clinical trials in the care of plasma cell leukemia patients.

Plasma cell leukemia: A review of the molecular classification, diagnosis, and evidenced-based treatment

Plasma cell leukemia is a rare and aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia associated with dismal outcomes. It may arise de novo, primary plasma cell leukemia, or evolve from an antecedent diagnosis of multiple myeloma, secondary plasma cell leukemia. Despite highly effective therapeutics, survival for plasma cell leukemia patients remains poor. Molecular knowledge of plasma cell leukemia has recently expanded with use of gene expression profiling and whole exome sequencing, lending new insights into prognosis and therapeutic development. In this review, we describe the molecular knowledge, clinical characteristics, evidenced-based therapeutic approaches and treatment outcomes of plasma cell leukemia.

Management of Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia Remains Challenging Even in the Era of Novel Agents

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and aggressive variant of multiple myeloma (MM). PCL is characterized by peripheral blood involvement by malignant plasma cells and an aggressive clinical course leading to poor survival. There is considerable overlap between MM and PCL with respect to clinical, immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic features, but circulating plasma cell count exceeding 20% of peripheral blood leukocytes or an absolute plasma cell count of >2000/mm³ distinguishes it from MM. After initial stabilization and diagnosis confirmation, treatment of PCL in a fit patient typically includes induction combination chemotherapy containing novel agents typically, with proteasome inhibitors (such as bortezomib) and immunomodulatory drugs (eg, lenalidomide), followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and multidrug maintenance therapy using novel agents post-HSCT. Long-term outcomes have improved employing this strategy but the prognosis for non-HSCT candidates remains poor and new approaches are needed for such PCL patients not eligible for HSCT. Here, we report a case of primary PCL, and a comprehensive and up to date review of the literature for diagnosis and management of PCL. We also present the findings of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan. Since PCL is often associated with extra-medulary disease, including PET scan at the time of staging and restaging may be a novel approach particularly to evaluate the extra-medullary disease sites.

Venetoclax in combination with chidamide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory primary plasma cell leukemia without t(11;14): A case report

BACKGROUND

Conventional therapies for primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) are usually ineffective, with a short remission time with the use of multiple myeloma medications, showing aggressiveness of pPCL. B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor venetoclax is usually used for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with t(11;14). There are very few studies published on the use of venetoclax in pPCL without t(11;14). Similarly, histone deacetylase inhibitors are considered effective for the treatment of RRMM, but there are no reports on their use in pPCL.

CASE SUMMARY

A 57-year-old woman with severe anemia, thrombocytopenia, multiple bone destruction, impaired renal function, and 42.7% of peripheral plasma cells is reported. After multiple chemotherapy regimens and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment, the disease progressed again. The patient had very good partial response and was maintained for a long time on venetoclax in combination with chidamide and dexamethasone therapy.

CONCLUSION

The success of venetoclax-chidamide-dexamethasone combination therapy in achieving a very good partial response suggested that it can be used for refractory/relapsed pPCL patients who have been exhausted with the use of various drug combinations and had poor survival outcomes.

A clinical perspective on plasma cell leukemia; current status and future directions

Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is an aggressive plasma cell disorder with a guarded prognosis. The diagnosis is confirmed when peripheral blood plasma cells (PCs) exceed 20% of white blood cells or 2000/μL. Emerging data demonstrates that patients with lower levels of circulating (PCs) have the same adverse prognosis, challenging the clinical disease definition, but supporting the adverse impact of circulating PCs. The cornerstone of treatment consists of combination therapy incorporating a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory agent, steroids, and/or anthracyclines and alkylators as part of more-intensive chemotherapy, followed by consolidative autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in eligible patients and then maintenance therapy. Monoclonal antibodies are also currently being evaluated in this setting with a strong rationale for their use based on their activity in multiple myeloma (MM). Due to limited therapeutic studies specifically evaluating pPCL, patients with pPCL should be considered for clinical trials. In contrast to MM, the outcomes of patients with pPCL have only modestly improved with novel therapies, and secondary PCL arising from MM in particular is associated with a dismal outlook. Newer drug combinations, immunotherapy, and cellular therapy are under investigation, and these approaches hopefully will demonstrate efficacy to improve the prognosis of pPCL.

Efficacy of Venetoclax and Dexamethasone in Refractory IgM Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia with t(11;14) and TP53 Mutation: A Case Report and Literature Review

Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is an uncommon disease. IgM multiple myeloma (MM) is an infrequent subtype that accounts for less than 1 percent of MM cases. IgM pPCL is quite rare with only a few cases published to date. We describe a case of a patient with IgM pPCL who initially presented with hyperviscosity syndrome requiring urgent plasma exchange. His bone marrow biopsy demonstrated t(11;14). He progressed on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulating agents, and other chemotherapy medications but later achieved very good partial response (VGPR) to venetoclax and dexamethasone. Given the poor prognosis of pPCL, further studies using venetoclax alone or in combination with other novel agents as first-line treatment options are warranted particularly in patients with t(11;14).

Risk and Response-Adapted Treatment in Multiple Myeloma

Simple Summary

Therapeutic strategies in multiple myeloma have been adapted only to age and comorbidities for a long time. Given the currently available therapeutic and technologic arsenal, the time may have come to refine this adaptation. First, high-risk patients should benefit from the most intensive and efficient combinations from diagnosis. Here, we review these different strategies and how to define and identify high-risk myeloma patients in current clinical practice. In addition, the advent of technologies detecting minimal residual disease gives us this opportunity to define the quality of response to treatment with an unpreceded sensitivity and adapt treatment accordingly. Finally, even if molecular targeting is still nascent in myeloma, some molecular features are interesting to detect at relapse to determine optimal salvage treatments.

Abstract

Myeloma therapeutic strategies have been adapted to patients’ age and comorbidities for a long time. However, although cytogenetics and clinical presentations (plasmablastic cytology; extramedullary disease) are major prognostic factors, until recently, all patients received the same treatment whatever their initial risk. No strong evidence allows us to use a personalized treatment according to one cytogenetic abnormality in newly diagnosed myeloma. Retrospective studies showed a benefit of a double autologous transplant in high-risk cytogenetics according to the International Myeloma Working Group definition (t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p)). Moreover, this definition has to be updated since other independent abnormalities, namely gain 1q, del(1p32), and trisomies 5 or 21, as well as TP53 mutations, are also prognostic. Another very strong predictive tool is the response to treatment assessed by the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD). We are convinced that the time has come to use it to adapt the strategy to a dynamic risk. Many trials are ongoing to answer many questions: when and how should we adapt the therapy, its intensity and duration. Nevertheless, we also have to take into account the clinical outcome for one patient, especially adverse events affecting his or her quality of life and his or her preferences for continuous/fixed duration treatment.

Primary plasma cell leukaemia in a 39-year-old man

Plasma cell leukaemia (PCL) is an aggressive haematological malignancy which is classified into primary (pPCL) and secondary PCL. A 39-year-old Indian man presented to the Department of Hematology with a 2-week history of fever and lethargy. Clinically, he was pale and febrile. Haemogram revealed bicytopenia with leucocytosis. The peripheral blood film portrayed rouleax formation with 45% of circulating plasma cells. Serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation revealed IgG lambda paraproteinaemia of 48 g/L. Bone marrow aspirate, flow cytometry and trephine were consistent with IgG lambda pPCL. He was treated with six cycles of bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone combination chemotherapy followed by high-dose melphalan conditioning and autologous stem cell transplant. Currently, he is in complete remission for the past 18 months and is on oral lenalidomide maintenance therapy. Prognosis is often dismal in pPCL with the median overall survival below 1 year if treatment is delayed.

Plasma Cell Leukemia - Facts and Controversies: More Questions than Answers?

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is an aggressive hematological malignancy characterized by an uncontrolled clonal proliferation of plasma cells (PCs) in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. PCL has been defined by an absolute number of circulating PCs exceeding 2.0 × 10⁹/L and/or >20% PCs in the total leucocyte count. It is classified as primary PCL, which develops de novo, and secondary PCL, occurring at the late and advanced stages of multiple myeloma (MM). Primary and secondary PCL are clinically and biologically two distinct entities. After the diagnosis, treatment should be immediate and should include a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator-based combination regimens as induction, followed by stem cell transplantation (SCT) in transplant-eligible individuals who have cleared the peripheral blood of circulating PCs. Due to the rarity of the condition, there have been very few clinical trials. Furthermore, virtually all of the myeloma trials exclude patients with active PCL. The evaluation of response has been defined by the International Myeloma Working Group and consists of both acute leukemia and MM criteria. With conventional chemotherapy, the prognosis of primary PCL has been ominous, with reported overall survival (OS) ranging from 6.8 to 12.6 months. The use of novel agents and autologous SCT appears to be associated with deeper response and an improved survival, although it still remains low. The PCL prognostic index provides a simple score to risk-stratify PCL. The prognosis of secondary PCL is extremely poor, with OS of only 1 month.

Dexamethasone inhibits pancreatic tumor growth in preclinical models: Involvement of activating glucocorticoid receptor

Glucocorticoid receptor (GR) modulates extensive biological and pathological processes including tumor progression through diverse mechanisms. The regulatory effects of dexamethasone (DEX), a synthetic glucocorticoid, as well as its interaction with GR have been recognized beyond hematologic cancers. In the present study, we investigated the anti-cancer efficacy of DEX and the correlation with GR in pancreatic cancer, a most aggressive malignancy threatening human health. The differential levels of GR expression were examined in two human pancreatic cancer cell lines, PANC-1 and SW1990, as well as in xenografts and patient tumor tissues. DEX significantly inhibited colony formation, migration, and tumor growth of PANC-1 cells expressing abundant GR. The underlying mechanisms involved suppression of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) phosphorylation and down-regulation of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). The anti-cancer effects of DEX were partially reversed by GR silencing or combinational administration of GR antagonist, RU486. The dose-dependent efficacy of DEX in tumor growth inhibition was also demonstrated in a GR-positive patient-derived xenograft model along with safety in mice. DEX was less potent, however, in SW1990 cells with poor GR expression. Our findings suggest that DEX effectively inhibits pancreatic tumor growth partially through GR activation. The potential correlation between GR expression and anti-cancer efficacy of DEX may have some clinical implications.

Utilizing multiparametric flow cytometry in the diagnosis of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia

The diagnosis of primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) has been made by quantifying circulating plasma cells (cPCs) morphologically on a peripheral blood (PB) smear. However, this technique is not sufficiently sensitive. Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) provides a readily available and highly sensitive method to identify and quantify cPCs that could complement PB smear assessment. However, an optimal quantitative cutoff for cPCs by MFC to identify pPCL has not been established. Thus, a total of 591 patients newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who had their PB samples evaluated morphologically by PB smear, and immunophenotypically by MFC prior to beginning therapy were evaluated. The presence of ≥200 cPCs/μL by MFC (N = 25 or 5% of the total population) was chosen to identify patients with ≥5% cPCs by PB smear with a specificity of 99% and a sensitivity of 77%. For patients with ≥200 cPCs/μL by MFC compared to the remainder of the cohort, the median Time to next therapy (TTNT) was 18 vs 30 months and the median OS was 38 vs 70 months respectively. Thus, MFC assessment of PB can be utilized in conjunction with the morphological assessment of a PB smear to aid in improving the identification of pPCL among NDMM patients.

Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia: Real-World Retrospective Study of 46 Patients From a Single-Center Study in China

BACKGROUND

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PPCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder. The use of novel agents, together with autologous stem cell transplantation, has improved survival outcome in PPCL. However, the prognosis is still very poor, and the optimal treatment remains an unmet clinical need.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied the efficacy and prognostic impact of novel agents in 46 patients with PPCL patients at the Blood Diseases Hospital in China. We examined the impact of clinical and laboratory features, as well as therapies (bortezomib- and/or immunomodulatory drug-based therapies, chemotherapy) on survival and extent of clinical response, including progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival and OS were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival distributions were compared by log-rank test.

RESULTS

In our cohort of 46 PPCL patients, the median age at the time of diagnosis was 54 years. Overall response rate was 54% (25/46). The median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival time was 6 (0-12.5) months, and OS time was 14 (4.6-23.4) months. The OS time was significantly longer in patients treated with bortezomib-based versus non-bortezomib-based therapies (median [95% confidence interval], 19 [9-28.9] vs. 5 [4-24] months; P = .019).

CONCLUSION

This large single-center study of PPCL supports the use of bortezomib-based therapies as frontline treatment in PPCL patients.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation utilization and outcomes for primary plasma cell leukemia in the current era

The outcomes of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) after undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in the novel agent era are unknown. We report outcomes of 348 patients with pPCL receiving autologous (auto-) HCT (n = 277) and allogeneic (allo-) HCT (n = 71) between 2008 and 2015. Median age was 60 years and 56 years for auto- and allo-HCT respectively. For auto-HCT, the 4-year outcomes were: non-relapse mortality (NRM) 7% (4-11%), relapse (REL) 76% (69-82%), progression-free survival (PFS) 17% (13-23%), and overall survival (OS) 28% (22-35%). Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 90 and ≥very good partial response (VGPR) predicted superior OS in multi-variate analysis for auto-HCT. For allo-HCT, the 4-year outcomes were: NRM 12% (5-21%), REL 69% (56-81%), PFS 19% (10-31%), and OS 31% (19-44%). Compared with prior CIBMTR pPCL patients (1995-2006), inferior survival was noted in the current cohort (3-year OS, 39% vs. 38% in allo-HCT, and 62% vs. 35% in auto-HCT) respectively. However, we noted an increased HCT utilization, from 12% (7-21%) in 1995 to 46% (34-64%) in 2009 using SEER data (available till 2009). Despite modern induction translating to higher proportion receiving HCT, the outcomes remain poor in pPCL patients, mainly derived by high relapse rates post-HCT.

Bortezomib-based Regimens Improve the Outcome of Patients with Primary or Secondary Plasma Cell Leukemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective:

The management experience for plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is still limited by PCL’s rare incidence and aggressive course. The goal of this study was to further identify the efficacy of bortezomib-containing regimens for PCL in Chinese patients.

Materials and Methods:

In this study, 56 consecutive PCL patients [14 primary PCL (pPCL) and 42 secondary PCL (sPCL) cases] were retrospectively enrolled and 42/56 patients received bortezomib-based regimens (BBRs), including 10/14 pPCL and 32/42 sPCL patients. The patients’ survival data, clinical information, and safety data were collected and analyzed.

Results:

In pPCL and sPCL patients, the overall response rate in the bortezomib group was 90.0% and 25.0%, respectively. The median progression-free survival from PCL diagnosis for pPCL and sPCL was 8.3 months vs. 2.9 months (p=0.043) and median overall survival (OS) from PCL diagnosis was 23.3 months vs. 4.0 months. The OS for patients receiving BBRs was significantly longer for both pPCL (8.3 vs. 1.2 months, p=0.002) and sPCL (4.3 vs. 1.1 months, p<0.001). In multivariate COX analysis, BBR treatment [p=0.008, hazard ratio (HR)=0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.19-0.77] and very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) (p=0.035, HR=0.19, 95% CI=0.04-0.74) were independent predictors of OS for sPCL patients. For pPCL patients, BBR predicted OS (p=0.029, HR=0.056, 95% CI=0.004-0.745) instead of ≥VGPR (p=0.272, HR=3.365, 95% CI=0.38-29.303).

Conclusion:

It was found that BBRs could significantly improve OS for both pPCL and sPCL patients.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of the Anti-Cancer Effect of Dexamethasone in Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts and Anticipation of Human Efficacious Doses

Dexamethasone (DEX), a synthetic glucocorticoid, exhibited anti-cancer efficacy in pancreatic xenografts derived from patient tumor tissue or cancer cell lines. The aim of this study was to establish pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models to quantitatively characterize the inhibitory effect of DEX on tumor growth as well as its discrepancy among 3 xenograft models. Data of tumor growth profiles were collected from a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model in NOD/SCID mice and 2 cell line-derived (PANC-1 and SW1990) xenograft models in BALB/c nude mice. Empirical PK/PD models were developed to establish mathematical relationships between plasma concentration of DEX and tumor growth dynamics after integrating PK parameters extracted from literature. Drug effect in each model was well described by a linear inhibitory function with a potency factor of 4.67, 3.14, and 2.35 L/mg for PDX, PANC-1, and SW1990 xenograft, respectively. Human efficacious doses of DEX were preliminarily predicted through model-based simulation, and 60% tumor growth inhibition at clinical exposure corresponded to a daily dose range of 26-52 mg intravenously. This modeling work quantified the preclinical anti-cancer effect of DEX and demonstrated the feasibility of its medication in pancreatic cancer, which would be conductive to future translational research.

An update on biology, diagnosis and treatment of primary plasma cell leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PPCL) is one of the most aggressive hematological malignancies. The prognosis of PPCL patients remains poor, although some improvements have been made in recent years. Areas covered: In this review recent clinical and biological advances in PPCL are reported. Some recommendations for the practical management of these patients are provided, with a particular focus on the role of novel agents and transplant procedures. A brief description of the currently ongoing clinical trials with new drugs is also enclosed. Expert opinion: PPCL still represents a difficult challenge for all hematologists. Here the authors provide a personal view on how the current, generally unsatisfactory results in this neoplastic disorder could be improved. In particular, dedicated studies exploring alternative therapies are necessary and eagerly awaited. Such studies should possibly be based on new biological information that could be of help in identifying novel genetic biomarkers for risk stratification and new actionable molecular targets.

Plasma Cell Leukemia: Definition, Presentation, and Treatment

Purpose of Review

We discuss current topics on the definition of plasma cell leukemia and the distinction between plasma cell leukemia and multiple myeloma. Moreover, we review the latest literature on how to treat plasma cell leukemia.

Recent Findings

Plasma cell leukemia is clinically and genetically distinct from multiple myeloma. Plasma cell leukemia is defined by the observation in blood of more than 20% clonal plasma cells by differential count of the leucocytes or by counting more than 2 × 10⁹ per liter circulating clonal plasma cells. However, patients with lower levels of circulating plasma cells have the same adverse prognosis, which challenges the disease definition. Survival has improved after implementation of high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support, bortezomib, and lenalidomide in the treatment; yet, the prognosis remains poor. The results of allo-transplants have been disappointing.

Summary

The diagnostic criteria of PCL are currently discussed in the international myeloma community. Despite some improvement in survival, the prognosis remains adverse. New, more targeted treatment modalities, including immunotherapies, will hopefully improve the outcome in the near future.

Retrospective analysis of primary plasma cell leukemia in Kansai Myeloma Forum registry

•

The prevalence of pPCL was 1.2%.

•

Treatment with novel agents and transplantation may yield a better prognosis.

•

Hypercalcemia at diagnosis was suggested to predict worse outcomes.

We retrospectively analyzed twenty-six patients with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) registered from May 2005 until April 2015 by the Kansai Myeloma Forum. Twenty patients received novel agents (bortezomib or lenalidomide), and their median survival of was 34 months. The median survival of patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) was 40 months, those undergoing allogeneic SCT 55 months, and those undergoing both types of SCT (auto–allo) 61 months; whereas for those who did not undergo SCT it was 28 months (p = 0.845). The only statistically significant risk factor identified by multivariate analysis was hypercalcemia.

Real-world data on prognosis and outcome of primary plasma cell leukemia in the era of novel agents: a multicenter national study by the Greek Myeloma Study Group

We have studied the efficacy and the prognostic impact of novel agents in 50 primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) patients registered in our database. Eighty percent of patients were treated upfront with novel agent-based combinations; 40% underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Objective response rate was 76; 38% achieved at least very good partial response (≥vgPR) and this correlated significantly with bortezomib-based therapy plus ASCT. At the time of evaluation, 40 patients had died. Early mortality rate (≤1 month) was 6%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12 months and 18 months respectively, both significantly longer in patients treated with bortezomib-based therapy + ASCT vs. others (PFS: 18 vs. 9 months; p = 0.004, OS: 48 vs. 14 months; p = 0.007). Bortezomib-based therapy + ASCT predicted for OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, achievement of ≥vgPR and LDH ≥ 300 U/L were significant predictors for OS. These real-world data, based on one of the largest reported national multicenter series of pPCL patients treated mostly with novel agents support that, among the currently approved induction therapies, bortezomib-based regimens are highly effective and reduce the rate of early mortality whereas in combination with ASCT consolidation they prolong OS.

Prognostic indicators in primary plasma cell leukaemia: a multicentre retrospective study of 117 patients

We report a multicentre retrospective study that analysed clinical characteristics and outcomes in 117 patients with primary plasma cell leukaemia (pPCL) treated at the participating institutions between January 2006 and December 2016. The median age at the time of pPCL diagnosis was 61 years. Ninety-eight patients were treated with novel agents, with an overall response rate of 78%. Fifty-five patients (64%) patients underwent upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The median follow-up time was 50 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 33; 76), with a median overall survival (OS) for the entire group of 23 months (95% CI 15; 34). The median OS time in patients who underwent upfront ASCT was 35 months (95% CI 24·3; 46) as compared to 13 months (95% CI 6·3; 35·8) in patients who did not receive ASCT (P = 0·001). Multivariate analyses identified age ≥60 years, platelet count ≤100 × 10⁹ /l and peripheral blood plasma cell count ≥20 × 10⁹ /l as independent predictors of worse survival. The median OS in patients with 0, 1 or 2-3 of these risk factors was 46, 27 and 12 months, respectively (P < 0·001). Our findings support the use of novel agents and ASCT as frontline treatment in patients with pPCL. The constructed prognostic score should be independently validated.