Cost-effectiveness of oral antiplatelet agents—current and future perspectives

Micelle-Incorporated Liquid Chromatography in the Light of Green Chemistry: An Application for the Quality Control Analysis of Anti-Platelet Fixed-Dose Combinations

Background

Oral anti-platelet agents are the cornerstone of the treatment of multiple cardiovascular diseases and in the long-term prevention of their recurrence.

Objective

In the present work, we report a method based on micellar liquid chromatography coupled with ultraviolet detection (MLC/UV), for the simultaneous quantification of combined anti-platelet therapy namely, clopidogrel bisulfate (CPS), aspirin (ASP), together with salicylic acid (SA), in their pharmaceutical dosage form.

Methods

The incorporation of 0.1M polyoxyethylene 23 lauryl ether (Brij-35) as a surfactant into the mobile phase improved solute–mobile phase interaction allowing for minimal organic solvent utilization, enhanced resolution, and rapid analysis (7 min). Furthermore, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of the environmental impact caused by our procedures versus previously reported analytical procedures applied in the determination of CPS and ASP. The evaluation was made using the Eco-scale tool.

Results

The results of the developed method indicated the superiority of our procedures in terms of greenness without compromising the quality of performance characteristics. The method was linear in the range of 1–100 µg/mL with limits of detection of 0.28, 0.32, and 0.29 µg/mL for CPS, ASP, and SA, respectively. The developed method can also be utilized to test the purity and the stability of ASP in pharmaceutical formulations through monitoring SA as its main degradation product.

Conclusion

The MLC/UV method was successfully applied to the quantitative analysis of CPS, ASP together with SA—as a main degradation product of ASP—in their pharmaceutical dosage form

Highlights

The developed method was successfully applied for the determination of clopidogrel bisulfate (CPS), aspirin (ASP), together with salicylic acid (SA), in their pharmaceutical dosage form.

Monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor or aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with established atherosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is recommended among patients with established atherosclerosis. We compared monotherapy with a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor versus aspirin for secondary prevention.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, all randomised trials comparing P2Y₁₂ inhibitor with aspirin monotherapy for secondary prevention in patients with cerebrovascular, coronary, or peripheral artery disease were evaluated for inclusion. On Dec 18, 2019, we searched PubMed, Embase, BioMedCentral, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Additionally, we reviewed references from identified articles and searched abstracts from 2017 to 2019 presented at relevant scientific meetings. Data about year of publication, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample size, baseline patients' features including the baseline condition determining study inclusion (ie, cerebrovascular, coronary, or peripheral artery disease), P2Y₁₂ inhibitor type and dosage, aspirin dosage, endpoint definitions, effect estimates, follow-up duration, and percentage of patients lost to follow-up were collected. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used as metric of choice for treatment effects with random-effects models. Co-primary endpoints were myocardial infarction and stroke. Key secondary endpoints were all-cause death and vascular death. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² index. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018115037).

FINDINGS

A total of nine randomised trials were identified and included in this study, and 42 108 patients randomly allocated to a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor (n=21 043) or aspirin (n=21 065) were included in our analyses. Patients who received a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor had a borderline reduction for the risk of myocardial infarction compared with those who received aspirin (OR 0·81 [95% CI 0·66-0·99]; I²=10·9%). Risks of stroke (OR 0·93 [0·82-1·06]; I²=34·5%), all-cause death (OR 0·98 [0·89-1·08]; I²=0%), and vascular death (OR 0·97 [0·86-1·09]; I²=0%) did not differ between patients who received a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor and those who received aspirin. Similarly, the risk of major bleeding (OR 0·90 [0·74-1·10]; I²=3·9%) did not differ between patients who received a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor and those who received aspirin. The number needed to treat to prevent one myocardial infarction with P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy was 244 patients. Findings were consistent regardless of the type of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor used.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with aspirin monotherapy, P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy is associated with a risk reduction for myocardial infarction and a comparable risk of stroke in the setting of secondary prevention. The benefit of P2Y₁₂ inhibitor monotherapy is of debatable clinical relevance, in view of the high number needed to treat to prevent a myocardial infarction and the absence of any effect on all-cause and vascular mortality.

FUNDING

Italian Ministry of Education.

Investigation of CYP2C19 allele and genotype frequencies in Iranian population using experimental and computational approaches

CytochromeP4502C19 is a genetically polymorphic gene with prominent role in drug metabolism. Regarding its critical medical importance, this study was conducted to achieve accurate CYP2C19allele frequencies in Iranian population and hereby paving the way for a tailor-made CYP2C19 DNA test. Iran is a large multi-ethnic country, however, its population structure for CYP2C19 alleles is calculated as nearly zero (Fwc (st)=0.001). The Study was conducted on 691 individuals in Tehran, the conurbation in which total population structure is significantly eroded by massive immigration and DNA was analyzed by TaqMan SNP genotyping assay. A cumulative meta-analysis was then conducted to achieve less than five percent variation range in allele frequencies with 99.9% confidence level. High degree of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in pooled data proved the authenticity of meta-analysis. By cumulative meta-analysis the average frequencies of CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*3 alleles were calculated as 0.125[99.9% CI, 0.112-0.139] and 0.006[99.9% CI, 0.004-0.009], respectively. According to the solid frequency data obtained by pooling the data and meta-analysis and comparing with other ethnicities, Iranian population's CYP2C19 allele frequencies completely differ from other Asian ethnicities and matches African and European ethnicities the most. Since this is the biggest CYP2C19 allele frequency study in the Middle East, the results of this study will also be useful in cross-population and regional CYP2C19 genetic variation studies.

Antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: economic considerations

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most common medical procedures performed for treatment of coronary artery disease. Antiplatelet medications as adjunctive therapy for PCI are used routinely, with indications for specific agents or their combinations varying depending on the clinical scenario. While the cost-effectiveness of well-established agents has been extensively studied, newer drugs have not been evaluated as thoroughly. In addition, the clinical application of some antiplatelet drugs has recently changed, thus making older studies of cost effectiveness less applicable to the current landscape of clinical practice. This article reviews cost-effectiveness considerations of antiplatelet therapies in the treatment of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing PCI. Aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors including clopidogrel and the newer agents prasugrel and ticagrelor, as well as glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, are discussed. Overall, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients undergoing PCI improves ischaemic outcomes and appears to be cost effective. The few available studies suggest that the recently approved medications prasugrel and ticagrelor are cost-effective alternatives to clopidogrel. However, no direct comparison between these two newer agents is available. The indications for GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have changed in the current PCI era, and there is a paucity of cost-effectiveness data for their use in contemporary care.

Clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor? a practical guide to use of antiplatelet agents in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Aspirin is a cornerstone of therapy in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). However, dual antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of stent thrombosis and cardiovascular events compared with aspirin alone in the treatment of patients with ACS. Recently, there has been debate as to which antiplatelet agent should be added to aspirin in the ACS treatment regimen. This review summarizes the pharmacologic and clinical data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, and provides a practical guide to clinicians for determining which antiplatelet to use for patients with ACS.

Cost-effectiveness of 12-month treatment with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the management of acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

The PLATO (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes) randomized trial (NCT00391872) in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) reported that ticagrelor (in addition to aspirin) reduced the rate of the composite end point of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or cardiovascular death compared with clopidogrel (in addition to aspirin) by 16% over 12 months (P < 0.001). No significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding was noted, but ticagrelor was associated with a higher rate of major bleeding not related to coronary artery bypass grafting.

OBJECTIVE

By extrapolating the key findings of PLATO, we sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in the management of ACS in a contemporary Australian setting.

METHODS

A Markov model with 4 health states (free from further ACS events, MI, stroke, and death) was developed to simulate the long-term costs and outcomes associated with ACS. Event risks were based on data derived directly from PLATO, and costs and utilities were drawn from published sources. A 10-year time horizon was simulated, and future costs and benefits were discounted at a 5% annual rate. However, treatment with ticagrelor and clopidogrel was only assumed for the first 12 months, with no benefits applied beyond drug cessation. Sensitivity analyses were undertaken based on variations to key data inputs. All costs for resource use applied in the analysis were based on published Australian prices (in 2010/2011 dollars [A$]).

RESULTS

Over 10 years, the estimated quality-adjusted life-years lived per-patient were 5.74 and 5.68 for ticagrelor and clopidogrel, respectively. Net costs were A$19,132 for ticagrelor and A$18,428 for clopidogrel. These equated to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of A$9031 per quality-adjusted life-year gained for ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel. Sensitivity analyses indicated the result to be robust.

CONCLUSIONS

When assessed from the perspective of the Australian health care system, ticagrelor is likely to be cost-effective compared with clopidogrel in preventing downstream morbidity and mortality associated with ACS.

Cost-effectiveness of heart failure therapies

Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Management of HF involves accurate diagnosis and implementation of evidence-based treatment strategies. Costs related to the care of patients with HF have increased substantially over the past 2 decades, partly owing to new medications and diagnostic tests, increased rates of hospitalization, implantation of costly novel devices and, as the disease progresses, consideration for heart transplantation, mechanical circulatory support, and end-of-life care. Not surprisingly, HF places a huge burden on health-care systems, and widespread implementation of all potentially beneficial therapies for HF could prove unrealistic for many, if not all, nations. Cost-effectiveness analyses can help to quantify the relationship between clinical outcomes and the economic implications of available therapies. This Review is a critical overview of cost-effectiveness studies on key areas of HF management, involving pharmacological and nonpharmacological clinical therapies, including device-based and surgical therapeutic strategies.