1
|
Schmit S, Malshy K, Ochsner A, Golijanin B, Tucci C, Braunagel T, Golijanin D, Pareek G, Hyams E. Lower urinary tract symptoms in elderly men: Considerations for prostate cancer testing. Prostate 2024; 84:1290-1300. [PMID: 39051612 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Both lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and prostate cancer (PCa) are common in elderly men. While LUTS are generally due to a benign etiology, they may provoke an evaluation with prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which can lead to a cascade of further testing and possible overdiagnosis in patients with competing risks. There is limited patient and provider understanding of the relationship between LUTS and PCa risk, and a lack of clarity in how to evaluate these men to balance appropriate diagnosis of aggressive PCa with avoidance of overdiagnosis. METHODS A literature review was performed using keywords to query the electronic database PubMed. All articles published before November 2023 were screened by title and abstract for articles relevant to our subject. RESULTS Epidemiological studies suggest that LUTS and PCa are largely independent in elderly men. The best available tools to assess PCa risk include PSA permutations, novel biomarkers, and imaging, but there are limitations in older men based on lack of validation in the elderly and unclear applicability of traditional definitions of "clinically significant" disease. We present a three-tiered approach to evaluating these patients. CONCLUSION Elderly men commonly have LUTS as well as a high likelihood of indolent PCa. A systematic and shared decision-making-based approach can help to balance objectives of appropriate detection of phenotypically dangerous disease and avoidance of over-testing and overdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Schmit
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Kamil Malshy
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Anna Ochsner
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Borivoj Golijanin
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Christopher Tucci
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Taylor Braunagel
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Dragan Golijanin
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Gyan Pareek
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Elias Hyams
- The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital, Division of Urology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cook S, Alibhai S, Mehta R, Savard MF, Mariano C, LeBlanc D, Desautels D, Pezo R, Zhu X, Gelmon KA, Hsu T. Improving Care for Older Adults with Cancer in Canada: A Call to Action. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:3783-3797. [PMID: 39057151 PMCID: PMC11275828 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31070279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Most patients diagnosed with and dying from cancer in Canada are older adults, with aging contributing to the large projected growth in cancer incidence. Older adults with cancer have unique needs, and on a global scale increasing efforts have been made to address recognized gaps in their cancer care. However, in Canada, geriatric oncology remains a new and developing field. There is increasing recognition of the value of geriatric oncology and there is a growing number of healthcare providers interested in developing the field. While there is an increasing number of dedicated programs in geriatric oncology, they remain limited overall. Developing novel methods to delivery geriatric care in the oncology setting and improving visibility is important. Formal incorporation of a geriatric oncology curriculum into training is critical to both improve knowledge and demonstrate its value to healthcare providers. Although a robust group of dedicated researchers exist, increased collaboration is needed to capitalize on existing expertise. Dedicated funding is critical to promoting clinical programs, research, and training new clinicians and leaders in the field. By addressing challenges and capitalizing on opportunities for improvement, Canada can better meet the unique needs of its aging population with cancer and ultimately improve their outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Cook
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Shabbir Alibhai
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Rajin Mehta
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Marie-France Savard
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Caroline Mariano
- BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Dominique LeBlanc
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
| | - Danielle Desautels
- CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0V9, Canada
| | - Rossanna Pezo
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Xiaofu Zhu
- Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
| | - Karen A. Gelmon
- BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - Tina Hsu
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ninomiya K, Inoue D, Sugimoto K, Tanaka C, Murofushi K, Okuyama T, Watanuki S, Imamura CK, Sakai D, Sakurai N, Watanabe K, Tamura K, Saeki T, Ishiguro H. Significance of the comprehensive geriatric assessment in the administration of chemotherapy to older adults with cancer: Recommendations by the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee. J Geriatr Oncol 2023:101485. [PMID: 37062639 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The number of older patients with cancer is expected to continue to increase owing to the aging population. Recently, the usefulness of geriatric assessment (GA) conducted by multiple staff members from different medical backgrounds has been reported; however, a consensus on the effectiveness of GA has not yet been achieved. MATERIALS AND METHODS We, as the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee for elderly patients with cancer, conducted a literature search of randomized controlled trials published before August 2021 that used GA or comprehensive GA (CGA) as an intervention for patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. As the key outcomes for answering the clinical question, we focused on survival benefit, adverse events, and quality of life (QOL). After a systematic review of these studies, the expert panel member developed recommendations according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS For older patients with cancer, GA or CGA is suggested during or before chemotherapy (weakly recommended). Chemotherapy-induced adverse events were significantly reduced by GA/CGA interventions without any adverse effects on survival. Health-related QOL tended to improve with the GA/CGA interventions. DISCUSSION Although, in our opinion, GA/CGA does require time and resources, it poses no harm patients. Therefore, we suggest expanding the human resources and educating skills of medical providers for clinical implementation of GA/CGA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiichiro Ninomiya
- Center for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Inoue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Ken Sugimoto
- Department of General Geriatric Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Chie Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Keiko Murofushi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Okuyama
- Department of Psychiatry / Palliative Care Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Watanuki
- National Center for Global Health and Medicine, National College of Nursing, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiyo K Imamura
- Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Department of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kiyotaka Watanabe
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuo Tamura
- NPO Clinical Hematology/Oncology Treatment Study Group, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Saeki
- Breast Oncology Service, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ishiguro
- Breast Oncology Service, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Performance of the SARC-F in identifying low grip strength and physical performance in older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101424. [PMID: 36657248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.101424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Remote, online geriatric assessment (GA) is gaining attention in oncology. Most GA domains can be assessed remotely. However, there is limited evidence identifying reliable tools that can be used in lieu of objective measures of physical function, such as grip strength and physical performance during remote, online GA. In this prospective cohort study, we aimed to assess the performance of the SARC-F, a screening questionnaire for sarcopenia, in identifying low grip strength and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Additionally, we assessed the satisfaction of clinical staff with using the SARC-F in the clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were prospectively collected from older adults with cancer of any type and stage who underwent GA in the geriatric oncology clinic of a tertiary cancer centre. Following GA, patients were asked to complete the SARC-F tool. Spearman correlations were performed between objective measures of physical function, SARC-F domains, and SARC-F total score. Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were assessed to evaluate the performance of SARC-F to detect low grip strength and SPPB. RESULTS Eighty (n = 80) older adults (mean age: 80 years) with cancer completed the SARC-F. A positive SARC-F was found in 31.3% of the cohort. Moderate correlations were found between the SPPB per point and Assistance in walking (r = -0.69), as well as the SPPB per point and total SARC-F score (r = -0.66). SARC-F exhibited moderate sensitivity in identifying low grip strength using the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) criteria (sensitivity: 64.3%) or the Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) criteria (sensitivity: 40.4%). However, specificity was high (>75%) regardless of the criteria applied. Similarly, moderate sensitivity (52.2%), but excellent specificity (97.1%) was found for SPPB. When low grip strength per FNIH was combined with low SPPB, SARC-F demonstrated high sensitivity (80%) and specificity (75.7%). DISCUSSION SARC-F exhibited promising performance in identifying low grip strength per FNIH and low SPPB combined. To definitively assess the performance of the SARC-F in detecting low grip strength and SPPB, larger studies are warranted.
Collapse
|
5
|
Paiva CE, Preto DD, de Lima C, Paiva BSR. To Treat or Not to Treat? Dilemmas when Deciding on Antineoplastic Treatment in Patients With Far Advanced Cancers. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231176639. [PMID: 37178323 PMCID: PMC10184254 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231176639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with advanced cancers and their oncologists are often faced with difficult treatment decisions, especially when there are borderline situations of expected benefit or increased risk of complications. In this narrative review, we will explore the decision-making process for patients with advanced cancers and provide insights on how to approach this complex task, while didactically dividing the oncologist's assessments according to a mnemonic rule of the ABCDE of therapeutic decision-making. Part A (advanced cancer) recalls that the rule is to be used specifically for advanced cancers. Parts B (potential benefits) and C (clinical conditions and risks) represents the traditional risk vs benefit scale. In Part D, we discuss ways to identify and understand patients' desires, values, preferences, and beliefs. The prognostic estimation, from Part E, may function as an "adjust" for the antineoplastic treatment decision-making. Treatment decisions need to be conducted by skilled oncologists, in a patient-centered care, aiming to promote valuable oncology with lower rates of aggressive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Eduardo Paiva
- Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Daniel D’Almeida Preto
- Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Crislaine de Lima
- Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Do You Feel Safe at Home? A Qualitative Study among Home-Dwelling Older Adults with Advanced Incurable Cancer. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122384. [PMID: 36553908 PMCID: PMC9778052 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Many older adults with cancer prefer to live at home, and home treatment and outpatient care have been recommended for such patients. To improve their mental health, it is important to identify the challenges that are faced by home-dwelling older adults with cancer. This study aimed to examine the impact of the home on older adults with advanced cancer who were receiving treatment and follow-up care. In a cross-sectional design with criterion-based sampling, eight qualitative interviews were transcribed and interpreted thematically. We identified three themes of home-safety management: good home-safety management, uncertain home-safety management, and home-safety management collapse. Moreover, we revealed eight sub-themes important to the participants' home-safety experience. Ensuring that older adults feel safe at home will afford them the opportunity to enjoy living at home, which in turn may alleviate their symptom burden and enhance their mental health.
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang L, Shi Y, Wang L, Rong L, Ren Y, Xu C, Wu J, Zhang M, Zhu L, Zhang J, Xu X, Hu W, Zhang J. Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of elderly patients with cancer in a top-ranked hospital in China, 2016-2020: Real-world study. Cancer Med 2022; 12:2885-2905. [PMID: 36164280 PMCID: PMC9939123 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer is mostly a disease of aging, and older patients with cancer are generally frailer. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and in-hospital outcomes and explore factors associated with duration, cost, and mortality during first hospitalization, in older patients with cancer admitted to a top-ranked hospital in China. METHODS Data on patients with solid cancer ≥65 years consecutively hospitalized in 2016-2020 were retrieved from the electronic medical records of Ruijin Hospital in Shanghai, China. Baseline characteristics, duration, cost, and mortality during hospitalization were described. Factors associated with duration, cost, and mortality during first hospitalization were explored using multivariable-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS 20,650 eligible patients with male proportion of 59% and median age of 70 years were analyzed. 45% of the patients underwent resection in our hospital. Upon first admission, 49% of patients had hypertension, 19% diabetes, 22% weight loss, and 28% risks of malnutrition. The median duration and cost of first hospitalization were 9 days and 32,000 RMB, respectively. 118 (0.6%) and 228 (1.1%) deaths occurred during first and any hospitalization, respectively. For first hospitalization, longer duration and higher cost were positively associated with older ages, male gender, emergency admission, certain tumor locations and histology, histories of diabetes, cirrhosis, and anticoagulant intake, higher body mass index, weight loss, reduced food intake, risk of falling, and worse self-care ability; in-hospital mortality was positively associated with age ≥85 years, emergency admission, certain cancer types, histories of hypertension and psychotropic intake, reduced food intake, and worse self-care ability. CONCLUSIONS This study identified certain baseline patient and tumor characteristics, medical and medication histories, changes of weight and food intake, diet, and self-care ability which were independently associated with in-hospital outcomes among older patients with cancer admitted to our hospital and which should be paid special attention to. While the factors might not be easily modifiable, our study can help identify patients at higher risks of inferior in-hospital outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Huang
- Department of OncologyRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina,Medical Center on Aging of Ruijin Hospital, MCARJH, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Yan Shi
- Department of OncologyRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Lei Wang
- Medical Center on Aging of Ruijin Hospital, MCARJH, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina,Department of GastroenterologyRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiPeople's Republic of China
| | - Lan Rong
- Department of GeriatricsRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Yan Ren
- Medical Center on Aging of Ruijin Hospital, MCARJH, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina,Department of GeriatricsRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Chenying Xu
- Medical Center on Aging of Ruijin Hospital, MCARJH, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina,Department of GeriatricsRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Junwei Wu
- Department of OncologyRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Mingmin Zhang
- Computer Center, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Lifeng Zhu
- Computer Center, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | | | - Xiaofeng Xu
- Shanghai Chief Technician Studio (Information & Technology)ShanghaiChina
| | - Weiguo Hu
- Medical Center on Aging of Ruijin Hospital, MCARJH, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina,Department of GeriatricsRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina,Department of SurgeryRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of OncologyRuijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineShanghaiChina,State Key Laboratory of Oncogenes and Related GenesShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maegawa FB, Ahmad M, Aguirre K, Elhanafi S, Chiba S, Philipovskiy A, Tyroch AH, Konstantinidis IT. The impact of minimally invasive surgery and frailty on post-hepatectomy outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1577-1584. [PMID: 35459620 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of patient frailty on post-hepatectomy outcomes is not well studied. We hypothesized that patient frailty is a strong predictor of 30-day post-hepatectomy complications. METHODS The liver-targeted National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for 2014-2019 was reviewed. A validated modified frailty index (mFI) was used. RESULTS A total of 24,150 hepatectomies were reviewed. Worsening frailty was associated with increased incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (mFI 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 was 3.9%, 6.3%, 10%, 8.1%, 50% respectively; p < 0.001). Minimally invasive hepatectomies had a lower rate of Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications for non-frail (Laparoscopic: 1%, Robotic: 2.6%, Open: 4.6%; p < 0.001) and frail patients (Laparoscopic: 3%, Robotic: 2.3%, Open: 7.7%; p < 0.001). Frail patients experienced higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver failure (5.4% vs 4.1% for non-frail; p < 0.001) and grade C liver failure (28% vs 21.1% for non-frail; p = 0.03). Incorporating mFI to Albumin-Bilirubin score (ALBI) improved its ability to predict Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications (AUC improved from 0.609 to 0.647; p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (AUC improved from 0.663 to 0.72; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Worsening frailty correlates with increased incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications post-hepatectomy, whereas minimally invasive approaches decrease this risk. Incorporating frailty assessment to ALBI improves its ability to predict major postoperative complications and 30-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe B Maegawa
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maria Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Katherine Aguirre
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Sherif Elhanafi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Shintaro Chiba
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Alexander Philipovskiy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Alan H Tyroch
- Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
NCOA4: An Immunomodulation-Related Prognostic Biomarker in Colon Adenocarcinoma and Pan-Cancer. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:5242437. [PMID: 35756082 PMCID: PMC9225891 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5242437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of cancer in humans requires a thorough understanding of the multiple pathways by which it develops. Recent studies suggest that nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) may be a predictive biomarker for renal cancer. In the present work, TCGA, GEPIA, and several bioinformatics approaches were used to analyze the NCOA4 expression patterns, prognostic relevance, and association between NCOA4 and clinicopathological features and immune cell infiltration. We investigated NCOA4 expression in malignancies. Low NCOA4 expression was associated with poor overall survival in individuals with malignancies such as cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, and clear cell renal carcinoma. We also analyzed NCOA4 DNA methylation in normal and primary tumor tissues and investigated possible functional pathways underlying NCOA4-mediated oncogenesis. In conclusion, downregulation of NCOA4 is associated with poor prognosis, and NCOA4 may be a predictive biomarker for COAD.
Collapse
|
10
|
Selected Domains within a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma are Highly Associated with Frailty. Clin Hematol Int 2022; 4:35-43. [PMID: 35950204 PMCID: PMC9358790 DOI: 10.1007/s44228-022-00005-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) is increasing, particularly among older patients who tend to have worse outcomes and can be predisposed to increased toxicities and less treatment tolerance. Therefore, a thorough pre-treatment assessment is essential. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can be used to evaluate the older patient considering chemotherapy and is the preferred evaluation tool. However, a formal CGA is laborious, complex and time-consuming. Objectives To characterize older adults with NHL and determine the CGA variables with the greatest association to frailty in order to propose a more simplified assessment. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study using data collected from CGAs in NHL patients > 65 years admitted to our oncology service, from September 2015 to August 2017. Our evaluation parameters included: polypharmacy, a screening tool of older people's prescriptions (STOPP), the Lawton scale, Barthel index, Katz index, gait speed, a Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, a Mini-Mental state examination (MMSE), the Yesavage and Gijon scales, a Mini-nutritional assessment (MNA), a Geriatric Syndromes assessment, and a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G). The formal CGA was comprised of nine domains; frailty was defined as an impairment in > 2 domains. Each parameter was individually compared with frailty, and the results were used to build different multivariate models using logistic regression analyses to obtain the variables with the highest frailty association. Results A total of 253 patients were included. Their median age was 75.4 years (range 65–92), and 62.1% had > 1 impaired domain, with 39.9% considered frail. Bivariate analysis showed strong associations with age > 85 and all the geriatric parameters except for STOPP. Our final multivariate analysis resulted in 5 domains (the use of > 5 medications, a Lawton < 7, TUG > 20, Yesavage > 5, and the presence of at least one geriatric syndrome) being significantly associated with frailty and performing similarly to a CGA. Conclusion In our population of older NHL patients, an abbreviated evaluation based of only five domains, polypharmacy, TUG, Lawton scale, Yesavage scale and the presence of at least one geriatric syndrome, had similar performance to a formal CGA in determining frailty.
Collapse
|
11
|
Jensen-Battaglia M, Lei L, Xu H, Kehoe L, Patil A, Loh KP, Ramsdale E, Magnuson A, Kleckner AS, Wildes TM, Lin PJ, Mustian KM, Giri G, Whitehead M, Bearden J, Burnette BL, Geer J, Mohile SG, Dunne RF. Association of Oncologist-Patient Communication With Functional Status and Physical Performance in Older Adults: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e223039. [PMID: 35302628 PMCID: PMC8933739 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.3039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The functional status and physical performance of older adults with cancer are underassessed and undertreated despite the high prevalence of impaired functional status and physical performance in this population and their associations with chemotherapy-induced toxic effects and mortality. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between providing oncologists with a geriatric assessment (GA) summary with recommendations and having oncologist-patient conversations about functional and physical performance. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data for this secondary analysis were collected from October 29, 2014, to April 28, 2017, for a national cluster randomized clinical trial conducted by the University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program evaluating the effect of a GA intervention on patient satisfaction with communication about aging-related concerns. There were 17 practice clusters in the intervention group and 14 in the usual care group. All 541 participants underwent a GA including standardized functional and physical performance measures and had 1 clinical encounter audio-recorded, transcribed, and blindly coded to categorize conversations by GA domain. Participants were aged 70 years or older, with a stage III or IV solid tumor or lymphoma with palliative treatment intent, and impairment in 1 or more GA domain. Statistical analysis was performed from August 18, 2020, to January 10, 2022. INTERVENTIONS Oncologist practices randomized to the intervention received a GA summary and validated recommendations for each patient prior to the audio-recorded clinical encounter. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary analysis of this clinical trial assessed the effect of the intervention on patient satisfaction with oncologist communication about aging-related concerns. This secondary analysis assessed the post hoc hypothesis that the intervention would be associated with an increase in the proportion of patients having conversations with their oncologists and receiving oncologist recommendations specific to functional and physical performance concerns. RESULTS A total of 541 patients (276 men [51%]; mean [SD] age, 77.5 [5.2] years [range, 70-96 years]) were analyzed at baseline. Excluding 13 patients without audio recordings, 86% of patients (95% CI, 78%-91%) in the intervention group vs 59% of patients (95% CI, 47%-69%; P < .001) receiving usual care had conversations about functional or physical performance. Conversations were more frequently initiated by oncologists in the intervention group (84%; 95% CI, 77%-90%) than oncologists in the usual care group (58%; 95% CI, 45%-70%; P < .001). Oncologists in the intervention group were more likely to address patients' concerns (43%; 95% CI, 33%-53%) than oncologists in the usual care group (17%; 95% CI, 10%-26%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this secondary analysis of a cluster randomized clinical trial, providing oncologists with a GA summary was associated with an increase in the number of oncologist-patient conversations about functional and physical performance-related concerns with recommendations to address these concerns. These findings support the use of the GA summary and recommendations as important tools in caring for older adults with advanced cancer and functional or physical impairments. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02107443.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marielle Jensen-Battaglia
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Lianlian Lei
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Huiwen Xu
- Sealy Center on Aging, Department of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Lee Kehoe
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Amita Patil
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Erika Ramsdale
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Allison Magnuson
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Amber S. Kleckner
- School of Nursing, Department of Pain and Translational Symptom Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore
| | | | - Po-Ju Lin
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Karen M. Mustian
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
- Division of Supportive Care in Cancer, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Gilbert Giri
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Mary Whitehead
- SCOREboard Advisory Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - James Bearden
- Upstate Carolina National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Spartanburg, South Carolina
| | - Brian L. Burnette
- Cancer Research of Wisconsin and Northern Michigan National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Green Bay
| | - Jodi Geer
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, St Louis Park
| | - Supriya G. Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Richard F. Dunne
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Su M, Yao N, Liu L, Cheng J, Sun X, Yue H, Zhang J. Older cancer survivors living with financial hardship in China: A qualitative study of family perspectives. Psychooncology 2021; 31:661-670. [PMID: 34784087 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Financial hardship among older cancer survivors has not been well-studied, despite its debilitating effects on their health and well-being. The purpose of this study was to describe the lived experiences of Chinese older cancer survivors who have experienced financial hardship following a cancer diagnosis. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted. Data was collected using in-depth interviews with 21 older cancer survivors (aged ≥ 60) with financial hardship and 20 family caregivers in Shandong Province, China between August 2020 and January 2021. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. RESULTS Four main themes emerged: (1) older survivors have insufficient ability to address cancer-related costs; (2) financial transfers from adult children to older parents became prevalent after a cancer diagnosis; (3) cancer-related financial worries and stress extended into children's families; (4) coping and adjustment strategies were used by the extended family. Traditional Confucian culture and the Chinese health care system considerably impacted the interpretation of financial hardship. CONCLUSION Both older cancer survivors and their adult children experienced financial distress impacted by filial piety in China. Strategies adapted to Confucian family values and the health care system are needed to address cancer-related financial hardships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingzhu Su
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Nengliang Yao
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Li Liu
- School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Joyce Cheng
- College of Arts and Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.,School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Xiaojie Sun
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Hanlin Yue
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Jiajun Zhang
- Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.,NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research (Shandong University), Jinan, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yuan Y, Lee JS, Yost SE, Stiller T, Blanchard MS, Padam S, Katheria V, Kim H, Sun C, Tang A, Martinez N, Patel ND, Sedrak MS, Waisman J, Li D, Sanani S, Presant CA, Mortimer J. Phase II study of neratinib in older adults with HER2 amplified or HER2/3 mutated metastatic breast cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:752-758. [PMID: 33663941 PMCID: PMC8580161 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The tolerability and efficacy of targeted therapy in older adults with cancer has not been adequately studied. Neratinib is a novel HER1, HER2, HER4 tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has recently been granted FDA approval for treatment of breast cancer. The major toxicity of neratinib is diarrhea, which affects up to 90% of patients. This phase II trial evaluates the safety and tolerability of neratinib in adults ≥60. METHODS Patients aged 60 or older with histologically proven metastatic breast cancer and HER2 amplification (defined by ASCO/CAP guideline) or HER2/HER3 activating mutation were enrolled to receive neratinib at 240 mg daily in 28-day cycles. The association between tolerability, defined as dose reduction and number of completed courses, and log2 Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) toxicity risk score was assessed using a Student's t-test and linear regression, respectively. Response rate, progression free survival, and overall survival were also evaluated. RESULTS 25 patients were enrolled with median age of 66 (range 60-79). Seventy-six percent of patients were white, 16% Asian, and 8% African-American. Seventy-six percent were patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and 24% were patients with HR negative MBC. Median number of prior lines of metastatic therapy were 3 (range 0-11). 20/25 (80%) had worst grade toxicities ≥2. A total of 9/25 (36%) had grade 3 toxicities including 5/20 (20%) diarrhea, 2/20 (8%) vomiting, and 2/20 (8%) abdominal pain. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. A total of 9/25 (36%) had dose reduction, and 2/25 (8%) discontinued therapy due to toxicity. The association between dose reductions and CARG toxicity score reached borderline statistical significance suggesting a trend with participants with higher CARG toxicity risk scores being more likely to require a dose modification (p = 0.054). 1/25 (4%) had a partial response, 11/25 (44%) had stable disease, 12/25 (48%) had progression of disease, and 1/25 (4%) was not assessed. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.6 months (95% CI [2.56-5.26]), and median overall survival (OS) was 17.4 months (95% CI [10.3, NA]). CONCLUSIONS Neratinib was safe in this population of older adults with HER2 amplified or HER2/3 mutated metastatic breast cancer (BC). Higher CARG toxicity risk score may be associated with greater need for dose adjustments. Future studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
| | - Jin Sun Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Susan E Yost
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Tracey Stiller
- Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - M Suzette Blanchard
- Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Simran Padam
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Vani Katheria
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Heeyoung Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Canlan Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Aileen Tang
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Norma Martinez
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Niki Dipesh Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Mina S Sedrak
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - James Waisman
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Daneng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Shamel Sanani
- City of Hope National Medical Center, Mission Hills, CA, United States of America
| | - Cary A Presant
- City of Hope National Medical Center, West Covina, CA, United States of America
| | - Joanne Mortimer
- Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dinapoli L, Colloca G, Di Capua B, Valentini V. Psychological Aspects to Consider in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Curr Oncol Rep 2021; 23:38. [PMID: 33709235 PMCID: PMC7952347 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01049-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer diagnosed in women in the West World. Coping with cancer is cause of extreme stress for patients and their family. The purpose of this review is to evaluate possible approaches to follow to control those situations that can impact on quality of life (QoL) and compliance to treatments. RECENT FINDINGS Anxiety, distress, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder are the most frequent psychological disorders in BC patients. Cognitive disorders and sexual dysfunction can also be important in affecting QoL both in younger and older patients. Younger and older patients show different characteristics of these disorders and different strategies of managing them. Several psychotherapeutic and supportive approaches have proven effective in managing psychological disorders in BC patients. Every BC patient should be supported with these techniques during her entire oncological history, in order to increase QoL and compliance to treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loredana Dinapoli
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,UOS Psicologia Clinica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italia
| | - Giuseppe Colloca
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy. .,Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
| | - Beatrice Di Capua
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Marta GN, da Fonseca LG, Braghiroli MI, Moura F, Hoff PM, Sabbaga J. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in elderly patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2021; 76:e2498. [PMID: 33503195 PMCID: PMC7811833 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in elderly patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS We analyzed data from a cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated using systemic treatment according to the local institutional protocol. Patients were divided into two groups, Group A, individuals <70 years of age, and Group B, individuals 70 years of age or older at the time of treatment initiation. Efficacy, measured based on overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF), and toxicity were compared between groups. RESULTS A total of 238 patients with advanced HCC who received sorafenib between 2007 and 2018 were evaluated. The median age for Group A was 59.1 years and that for Group B 73.6 years. The major prognostic characteristics were balanced between the groups. There were no significant differences in OS between Group A (8.0 months, 95%CI 6.34-9.3) and Group B (9.0 months, 95%CI 5.38-12.62), p=0.433, or in TTF between Group A (3.0 months, 95%CI 2.39-3.60) and Group B (3.0 months, 95%CI 1.68-4.32), p=0.936. There were no significant differences between Groups A and B with respect to the incidence of adverse events or treatment discontinuation because of toxicity. CONCLUSION Efficacy and safety of sorafenib did not differ significantly between younger and older patients with HCC. Our data suggest that age alone should not restrict clinical decision-making for patients with advanced HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Nader Marta
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Leonardo G. da Fonseca
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Maria Ignez Braghiroli
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Fernando Moura
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Paulo M. Hoff
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| | - Jorge Sabbaga
- Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clinicas (HCFMUSP), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pellerino A, Bruno F, Internò V, Rudà R, Soffietti R. Current clinical management of elderly patients with glioma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 20:1037-1048. [PMID: 32981392 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1828867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of gliomas is increasing in elderly patients. Clinical factors, such as age, performance status, and comorbidities contribute when choosing adequate treatment in older patients. AREAS COVERED This review covers the main pathological and molecular features of gliomas in elderly patients, as well as the neurological and geriatric assessment to select patients for surgery and antineoplastic treatments. The results from the most relevant clinical trials in both lower-grade (LGGs) and high-grade gliomas (HGGs) are reviewed. EXPERT OPINION Different clinical and biological factors need to be integrated into prognostic scales in order to better stratify the elderly population. Both Stupp and Perry regimens can be proposed to fit patients with GBM aged < 70 years. Conversely, for patients aged ≥ 70 years, the Perry regimen should be preferred. For unfit and frail patients, temozolomide alone when MGMT is methylated or hypofractionated RT alone when MGMT is unmethylated, are the optimal choice. Few data are available regarding the optimal management of elderly patients with LGGs. The benefit of an extensive resection and presence of methylation of the MGMT promoter need to be further investigated to confirm their role in improving the OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital , Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital , Turin, Italy
| | - Valeria Internò
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro , Bari, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital , Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital , Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Results from a multidisciplinary clinic guided by geriatric assessment before stem cell transplantation in older adults. Blood Adv 2020; 3:3488-3498. [PMID: 31725894 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Limitations found on geriatric assessment (GA) track with worse outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We report on a multidisciplinary team clinic (MDC), consisting of a cancer-specific GA and a multidisciplinary team of providers, to assess candidacy and create an individualized optimization plan for allogeneic HCT candidates aged ≥60 years and autologous HCT and adoptive T-cell therapy candidates aged ≥70 years. Among the 247 patients evaluated in the MDC, allogeneic HCT candidates comprised the majority (60%), followed by autologous HCT (37%) with occasional older cellular therapy candidates (3%). Almost all patients meeting program-required minimum ages for MDC optimization at our institution were assessed (98%). Relative to historical control subjects undergoing GA alone, allogeneic HCT patients aged ≥60 years who underwent MDC appraisal had similar frequencies of high-risk disease, reduced intensity regimens, and high comorbidity but fewer GA-graded functional impairments. The MDC cohort experienced fewer inpatient deaths, shorter length of stay, and fewer discharges to nursing facilities compared with control subjects. Improvements in early mortality were observed over time; 1-year overall survival improved from 43% in the pre-MDC era to 70% in the recent MDC era, and 1-year nonrelapse mortality decreased from 43% to 18%. The 31 autologous HCT recipients aged ≥70 years optimized by the MDC achieved 0% nonrelapse mortality and 97% overall survival at 1 year. A GA-guided MDC for older HCT candidates is feasible and seems to reduce transplant-associated morbidity and mortality. An MDC should encourage broader and safer utilization of transplantation in older patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Cheng KKF, Siah RCJ, Ream E, Kanesvaran R, Armes J. Protocol for a scoping review of digital health for older adults with cancer and their families. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038876. [PMID: 32847922 PMCID: PMC7451461 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2020] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The potential for digital medicine and healthcare in geriatric oncology settings has received much attention. This scoping review will summarise the nature and extent of the existing literature that describes and examines digital health development, implementation, evaluation, outcome and experience for older adults with cancer, their families and their healthcare providers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Arksey and O'Malley's six stages of scoping review methodology framework will be used. Searches will be conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase via OvidSP, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Plus via EBSCO, Scopus and PsycINFO via OvidSP for published articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals from year 2000 onwards. In addition, we will screen databases for all prospectively registered trials. Research articles using quantitative or qualitative study design or reviews will be included if they describe or report the design, development or usability of digital health interventions in the treatment and care of patients 65 years of age or older with cancer and their families before, during and after cancer treatment. Grey literature will not be searched and included. Two investigators will independently perform the literature search, eligibility assessments and study selection. A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram for the scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to delineate the search decision process. For included articles, the extracted results will be synthesised both quantitatively and qualitatively and reported under key conceptual categories of this scoping review. Research gaps and opportunities will be identified and summarised. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Since this review will only include published data, ethics approval will not be sought. The results of the review will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. We will also engage with relevant stakeholders within research team's networks to determine suitable approaches for dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karis Kin-Fong Cheng
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rosalind Chiew-Jiat Siah
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Emma Ream
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| | | | - Jo Armes
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
O'Donovan A, Morris L. Palliative Radiation Therapy in Older Adults With Cancer: Age-Related Considerations. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:766-774. [PMID: 32641244 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
There are many additional considerations when treating older adults with cancer, especially in the context of palliative care. Currently, radiation therapy is underutilised in some countries and disease sites, but there is also evidence of unnecessary treatment in other contexts. Making rational treatment decisions for older adults necessitates an underlying appraisal of the person's physiological reserve capacity. This is termed 'frailty', and there is considerable heterogeneity in its clinical presentation, from patients who are relatively robust and suitable for standard treatment, to those who are frail and perhaps require a different approach. Frailty assessment also presents an important opportunity for intervention, when followed by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in those who require it. Generally, a two-step approach, with a short initial screening, followed by CGA, is advocated in geriatric oncology guidelines. This has the potential to optimise care of the older person, and may also reverse or slow the development of frailty. It therefore has an important impact on the patient's quality of life, which is especially valued in the context of palliative care. Frailty assessment also allows a more informed discussion of treatment outcomes and a shared decision-making approach. With regards to the radiotherapy regimen itself, there are many adaptations that can better facilitate the older person, from positioning and immobilisation, to treatment prescriptions. Treatment courses should be as short as possible and take into account the older person's unique circumstances. The additional burden of travel to treatment for the patient, caregiver or family/support network should also be considered. Reducing treatments to single fractions may be appropriate, or alternatively, hypofractionated regimens. In order to enhance care and meet the demands of a rapidly ageing population, future radiation oncology professionals require education on the basic principles of geriatric medicine, as many aspects remain poorly understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A O'Donovan
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT) research group, Discipline of Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - L Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Morishima T, Sato A, Nakata K, Miyashiro I. Geriatric assessment domains to predict overall survival in older cancer patients: An analysis of functional status, comorbidities, and nutritional status as prognostic factors. Cancer Med 2020; 9:5839-5850. [PMID: 32618120 PMCID: PMC7433808 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer treatments for older patients must account for heterogeneity in health and functional status. Guidelines advocate the use of geriatric assessments (GAs), but comprehensive assessments are laborious and the utility of specific GA domains remains unclear. The identification of specific domains as prognostic factors may support survival predictions and treatment decisions. We aimed to evaluate the associations between several GA domains and overall survival in older cancer patients. We linked cancer registry data and administrative claims data from cancer patients residing in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. The subjects were patients aged ≥70 years who received a diagnosis of gastric, colorectal, or lung cancer between 2010 and 2014 at 36 designated cancer care hospitals. The following three GA domains were assessed at cancer diagnosis: functional status through activities of daily living (ADL), comorbidities, and nutritional status through body mass index. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for the three cancer types to estimate each domain's prognostic effect while adjusting for gender, age, and cancer stage. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality were calculated. We identified 5,559, 4,746, and 4,837 patients with gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer respectively. ADL impairment (HRs: 1.39-3.34, 1.64-2.86, and 1.24-3.21 for gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively), comorbidities (1.32-1.58, 1.33-1.97, and 1.19-1.29 for gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively), and underweight (1.36, 1.51, and 1.54 for gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively) were significantly associated with poorer overall survival. In contrast, overweight was significantly associated with improved overall survival (HRs: 0.82 and 0.89 for gastric and lung cancer respectively). The addition of the three domains increased the models' C-statistics (0.816 to 0.836, 0.764 to 0.787, and 0.759 to 0.783 for gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer respectively). Incorporating these factors into initial patient evaluations during diagnosis may aid prognostic predictions and treatment strategies in geriatric oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Akira Sato
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kayo Nakata
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Isao Miyashiro
- Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Martin FE, Kalsi T, Baker H, Bharathan R, Sbai M, Partridge JSL, Dhesi JK. Functional recovery in older women undergoing surgery for gynaecological malignancies: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:1087-1095. [PMID: 32601003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Older women are increasingly undergoing surgery for gynaecological malignancies. Although survival data is available other outcomes such as functional recovery are less well described. This systematic review and narrative synthesis describes functional recovery after gynaeoncology surgery with respect to baseline characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS Systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and Cochrane Library between 1974 to 2018. Two reviewers independently reviewed abstracts/papers for inclusion against the following criteria: Results analysed and presented using narrative synthesis. RESULTS Fifteen studies identified (8 Endometrial, 2 Ovarian, 2 Vulval, 3 mixed cancer types). 1/15 used a standalone functional assessment tool, 14/15 used Health-Related Quality of Life tools (EORTC QLQ C30 (8), FACT-G (3), SF-36 (3)) comprising items describing function. More studies showed full recovery to baseline (n = 13) than incomplete recovery (n = 2). Four studies reported a negative association between older age and functional trajectory. Recovery was more likely and occurred faster in minimally-invasive surgery. Few studies reported baseline characteristics including cognition, frailty or comorbidities and none examined associations with functional recovery. CONCLUSION There is inadequate data on functional recovery of older women following gynaeoncology surgery. Future studies are needed to identify factors associated with poorer/better outcomes. This may enable identification of opportunities for risk reduction, improve equity of access and better shared-decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fionna E Martin
- Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Tania Kalsi
- Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Primary Care and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Holly Baker
- Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rasiah Bharathan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Leicester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Magda Sbai
- Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Judith S L Partridge
- Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Primary Care and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jugdeep K Dhesi
- Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Division of Primary Care and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dale W, Mohile SG. Lessons Learned from Arti-Collaborating to Improve Care: the Past, Present, and Future of the Cancer and Aging Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 67:879-883. [PMID: 31034593 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Dr Arti Hurria, who died tragically in November 2018, was a driving force in the growing field of geriatric oncology. She led the field through her commitment to her goals, collaboration with her colleagues, and the creation of the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG). As two of her closest colleagues, we are carrying her work forward with our colleagues through an infrastructure grant we led with Arti from the National Institute on Aging (R21/33; CARinG). This grant will provide a national structure for continuing to build the field through research, mentorship, and dissemination. We miss our friend dearly but are committed to carrying her legacy forward through CARG. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:879-883, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Dale
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, Center for Cancer and Aging, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- Geriatric Oncology Research Program, Cancer Care Delivery Research, University of Rochester Cancer Cancer (URCC) NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Research Base, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sedrak MS, Li D, Walter LC, Mustian K, High KP, Canin B, Mohile SG, Dale W, Sun CL. Cores for geriatric oncology infrastructure in the Cancer and Aging Research Group: Biostatistics, epidemiology, and research design (the analytics core). J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:355-358. [PMID: 31326391 PMCID: PMC6980442 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 07/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mina S Sedrak
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
| | - Daneng Li
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Louise C Walter
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of America; San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Karen Mustian
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Kevin P High
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | - Beverly Canin
- SCOREboard Advisory Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States of America
| | - William Dale
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Can-Lan Sun
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Cancer occurs most frequently in patients aged 65 and older. With the increasing age of the world's population, there will be a significant increase in cancer diagnoses in older adults. Aging imposes a wide variety of physiological responses, comorbidities, and ailments, but older patients are less represented in clinical studies. Specific needs of older patients with cancer often go under-recognized and consequently unmet. In this review, common diagnoses that can affect the outcomes of this population, including frailty, malnutrition, and delirium, are discussed. Areas that need further research to improve the care of geriatric cancer patients, particularly in the hospital settings, are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne M Meehan
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lena Kassab
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Haixia Qin
- Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mohile SG, Epstein RM, Hurria A, Heckler CE, Canin B, Culakova E, Duberstein P, Gilmore N, Xu H, Plumb S, Wells M, Lowenstein LM, Flannery MA, Janelsins M, Magnuson A, Loh KP, Kleckner AS, Mustian KM, Hopkins JO, Liu JJ, Geer J, Gorawara-Bhat R, Morrow GR, Dale W. Communication With Older Patients With Cancer Using Geriatric Assessment: A Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial From the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:196-204. [PMID: 31697365 PMCID: PMC6865234 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.4728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance Older patients with cancer and their caregivers worry about the effects of cancer treatment on aging-related domains (eg, function and cognition). Quality conversations with oncologists about aging-related concerns could improve patient-centered outcomes. A geriatric assessment (GA) can capture evidence-based aging-related conditions associated with poor clinical outcomes (eg, toxic effects) for older patients with cancer. Objective To determine whether providing a GA summary and GA-guided recommendations to oncologists can improve communication about aging-related concerns. Design, Setting, and Participants This cluster-randomized clinical trial enrolled 541 participants from 31 community oncology practices within the University of Rochester National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program from October 29, 2014, to April 28, 2017. Patients were aged 70 years or older with an advanced solid malignant tumor or lymphoma who had at least 1 impaired GA domain; patients chose 1 caregiver to participate. The primary outcome was assessed on an intent-to-treat basis. Interventions Oncology practices were randomized to receive either a tailored GA summary with recommendations for each enrolled patient (intervention) or alerts only for patients meeting criteria for depression or cognitive impairment (usual care). Main Outcomes and Measures The predetermined primary outcome was patient satisfaction with communication about aging-related concerns (modified Health Care Climate Questionnaire [score range, 0-28; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction]), measured after the first oncology visit after the GA. Secondary outcomes included the number of aging-related concerns discussed during the visit (from content analysis of audiorecordings), quality of life (measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale for patients and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey for caregivers), and caregiver satisfaction with communication about aging-related patient concerns. Results A total of 541 eligible patients (264 women, 276 men, and 1 patient did not provide data; mean [SD] age, 76.6 [5.2] years) and 414 caregivers (310 women, 101 men, and 3 caregivers did not provide data; mean age, 66.5 [12.5] years) were enrolled. Patients in the intervention group were more satisfied after the visit with communication about aging-related concerns (difference in mean score, 1.09 points; 95% CI, 0.05-2.13 points; P = .04); satisfaction with communication about aging-related concerns remained higher in the intervention group over 6 months (difference in mean score, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.04-2.16; P = .04). There were more aging-related conversations in the intervention group's visits (difference, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.22-4.95; P < .001). Caregivers in the intervention group were more satisfied with communication after the visit (difference, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.12-1.98; P = .03). Quality of life outcomes did not differ between groups. Conclusions and Relevance Including GA in oncology clinical visits for older adults with advanced cancer improves patient-centered and caregiver-centered communication about aging-related concerns. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02107443.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya G. Mohile
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
| | - Ronald M. Epstein
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Arti Hurria
- Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Charles E. Heckler
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Beverly Canin
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- Stakeholders for Care in Oncology and Research for our Elders, Rochester, New York
| | - Eva Culakova
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Paul Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers University School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Nikesha Gilmore
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Huiwen Xu
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
| | - Sandy Plumb
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
| | - Megan Wells
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
| | - Lisa M. Lowenstein
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Marie A. Flannery
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- University of Rochester School of Nursing, Rochester, New York
| | - Michelle Janelsins
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Allison Magnuson
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
| | - Amber S. Kleckner
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Karen M. Mustian
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Judith O. Hopkins
- Novant Health Oncology Specialists, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Jane Jijun Liu
- Heartland Cancer Research National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Decatur, Illinois
| | - Jodi Geer
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program, St Louis Park
| | | | - Gary R. Morrow
- University of Rochester Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program Research Base, Rochester, New York
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - William Dale
- Department of Supportive Care, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mohile SG, Magnuson A, Pandya C, Velarde C, Duberstein P, Hurria A, Loh KP, Wells M, Plumb S, Gilmore N, Flannery M, Wittink M, Epstein R, Heckler CE, Janelsins M, Mustian K, Hopkins JO, Liu J, Peri S, Dale W. Community Oncologists' Decision-Making for Treatment of Older Patients With Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019. [PMID: 29523669 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.7047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: This study's objectives were to describe community oncologists' beliefs about and confidence with geriatric care and to determine whether geriatric-relevant information influences cancer treatment decisions. Methods: Community oncologists were recruited to participate in 2 multisite geriatric oncology trials. Participants shared their beliefs about and confidence in caring for older adults. They were also asked to make a first-line chemotherapy recommendation (combination vs single-agent vs no chemotherapy) for a hypothetical vignette of an older patient with advanced pancreatic cancer. Each oncologist received one randomly chosen vignette that varied on 3 variables: age (72/84 years), impaired function (yes/no), and cognitive impairment (yes/no). Other patient characteristics were held constant. Logistic regression models were used to identify associations between oncologist/vignette-patient characteristics and treatment decisions. Results: Oncologist response rate was 61% (n=305/498). Most oncologists agreed that "the care of older adults with cancer needs to be improved" (89%) and that "geriatrics training is essential" (72%). However, <25% were "very confident" in recognizing dementia or conducting a fall risk or functional assessment, and only 23% reported using the geriatric assessment in clinic. Each randomly varied patient characteristic was independently associated with the decision to treat: younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.01; 95% CI, 2.73-9.20), normal cognition (aOR, 5.42; 95% CI, 3.01-9.76), and being functionally intact (aOR, 3.85; 95% CI, 2.12-7.00). Accounting for all vignettes across all scenarios, 161 oncologists (52%) said they would offer chemotherapy. All variables were independently associated with prescribing single-agent over combination chemotherapy (older age: aOR, 3.22; 95% CI 1.43-7.25, impaired cognition: aOR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.36-7.20, impaired function: aOR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.12-5.72). Oncologists' characteristics were not associated with decisions about providing chemotherapy. Conclusion: Geriatric-relevant information, when available, strongly influences community oncologists' treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya G Mohile
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Allison Magnuson
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Chintan Pandya
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Carla Velarde
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Paul Duberstein
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Arti Hurria
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Megan Wells
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Sandy Plumb
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Nikesha Gilmore
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Marie Flannery
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Marsha Wittink
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Ronald Epstein
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Charles E Heckler
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Michelle Janelsins
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Karen Mustian
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Judith O Hopkins
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Jane Liu
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - Srihari Peri
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| | - William Dale
- From James Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, California; Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Decatur, Illinois; and Delaware/Christiana Care NCORP, Newark, Delaware
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
DuMontier C, Sedrak MS, Soo WK, Kenis C, Williams GR, Haase K, Harneshaug M, Mian H, Loh KP, Rostoft S, Dale W, Cohen HJ. Arti Hurria and the progress in integrating the geriatric assessment into oncology: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 11:203-211. [PMID: 31451439 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Until recently, the progress in the diagnosis and management of cancer has not been matched by similar progress in the assessment of the increasing numbers of older and more complex patients with cancer. Dr. Arti Hurria identified this gap at the outset of her career, which she dedicated toward studying the geriatric assessment (GA) as an improvement over traditional methods used in oncology to assess vulnerability in older patients with cancer. This review documents the progress of the GA and its integration into oncology. First, we detail the GA's origins in the field of geriatrics. Next, we chronicle the early rise of geriatric oncology, highlighting the calls of early thought-leaders to meet the demands of the rapidly aging cancer population. We describe Dr. Hurria's early efforts toward meeting these calls though the implementation of the GA in oncology research. We then summarize some of the seminal studies constituting the evidence base supporting GA's implementation. Finally, we lay out the evolution of cancer-focused guidelines recommending the GA, concluding with future needs to advance the next steps toward more widespread implementation in routine cancer care. Throughout, we describe Dr. Hurria's vision and its execution in driving progress of the GA in oncology, from her fellowship training to her co-authored guidelines recommending GA for all older adults with cancer-published in the year of her untimely death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clark DuMontier
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Mina S Sedrak
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Wee Kheng Soo
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, 5 Arnold St, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Department of Aged Medicine, Eastern Health, 8 Arnold St, Box Hill, VIC, Australia; Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, 8 Arnold St, Box Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Cindy Kenis
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Grant R Williams
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Institute of Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham, UK
| | - Kristen Haase
- College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Magnus Harneshaug
- The Research Centre for Age Related Functional Decline and Diseases, Innlandet Hospital Trust, P.O. box 68, 2313 Ottestad, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. box 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hira Mian
- Juravinski Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - William Dale
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, United States of America
| | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brain E. A tribute to Arti Hurria by the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 11:160-161. [PMID: 31331727 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
29
|
Sneha SG, Simhadri K, Subeesh VK, Sneha SV. Predictors of adverse drug reactions in geriatric patients: An exploratory study among cancer patients. South Asian J Cancer 2019; 8:130-133. [PMID: 31069198 PMCID: PMC6498717 DOI: 10.4103/sajc.sajc_218_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: The objective of this study was to study the predictors of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among geriatric patients in the Department of Medical Oncology. Methods: A hospital-based prospective observational study was carried out among 153 inpatients in the Department of Medical Oncology for 6 months. Patients above 60 years of age with a confirmed history of malignancy were included in the study. The potential risk factors for ADR were defined in relation to the patient and chemotherapeutic regimen and relationship between them was assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Among 153 patients, 94 (64.43%) experienced ADRs. The mean ADR per patient was 0.88 ± 1.2. The common ADRs found were alopecia (30.18%) and diarrhea (28.68%). Risk estimates revealed that there was a significant association between smokers (odds ratio [OR] = 10.326; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.345–45.47, P = 0.001), alcoholics (OR = 10.897; 95% CI 2.479–47.902, P = 0.001), increasing age (OR = 2.22; 95% CI 1.698–2.909, P = 0.001), overweight (OR = 16.68; 95% CI 2.179–127.741, P = 0.001), and male participants (OR = 0.143; 95% CI 0.05–0.390 P = 0.001) with the development of ADRs. The risk of carboplatin (OR = 13.359; 95% CI 3.056–58.406 P = 0.001) and 5-fluorouracil (OR = 1.938 95% CI 1.266–2.935 P = 0.001) use and occurrence of ADRs were also found to be high. Conclusion: The study findings showed that smoking, alcohol consumption, age more than 70 years, and overweight had a high risk for developing ADRs in geriatric patients who underwent chemotherapy. The independent risk factors identified should be targeted for preventive measures to improve anticancer agent prescription and reduce the risk of ADRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S George Sneha
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Kalpana Simhadri
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Viswam K Subeesh
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - S Varghese Sneha
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, M. S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hurria A, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Blanchard S, Burhenn P, Yeon CH, Yuan Y, Li D, Katheria V, Waisman JR, Luu TH, Somlo G, Noonan AM, Lee T, Sudan N, Chung S, Rotter A, Arsenyan A, Levi A, Choi J, Rubalcava A, Morrison R, Mortimer JE. A Phase II Trial of Older Adults With Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving nab-Paclitaxel: Melding the Fields of Geriatrics and Oncology. Clin Breast Cancer 2019; 19:89-96. [PMID: 30503309 PMCID: PMC8842512 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2018.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Phase II clinical trials including geriatric assessment (GA) measures are critical for improving the evidence base for older adults with cancer. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of nab-paclitaxel in older adults with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged ≥ 65 years with MBC and ≤ 1 previous line of chemotherapy received 100 mg of nab-paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. A GA was completed pre-chemotherapy, and the validated Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) chemotherapy toxicity risk score was calculated. Relationships between tolerability (number of courses, hospitalizations, dose reductions, and toxicity) and risk score were assessed using general linear models, Student t tests, and the Fisher test. Response rate and progression-free survival were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Forty patients (mean age, 73 years; range, 65-87 years) were included. The median number of cycles was 6, 75% (n = 30) of patients had ≥ 1 dose hold, and 50% (n = 20) had ≥ 1 dose reduction. Fifty-eight percent (n = 23) had treatment-related ≥ grade 3 toxicities, and 30% (n = 12) were hospitalized owing to toxicity. Thirty-five percent (n = 14) responded, and the median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval, 5.5 months to undefined). Patients with intermediate/high toxicity risk scores had higher risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicity than those with low risk scores (odds ratio, 5.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-33.1; P = .01). A higher mean risk score was associated with higher likelihood of dose reductions and hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS Among older adults with MBC receiving weekly nab-paclitaxel, more than one-half experienced ≥ grade 3 chemotherapy toxicity. However, a GA-based risk score could predict treatment tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arti Hurria
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA.
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA; Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Suzette Blanchard
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Peggy Burhenn
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | | | - Yuan Yuan
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Daneng Li
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Vani Katheria
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - James Ross Waisman
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Thehang H Luu
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - George Somlo
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Anne M Noonan
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH
| | - Ty Lee
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Nimit Sudan
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Samuel Chung
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Arnold Rotter
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Anait Arsenyan
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Abrahm Levi
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Jennifer Choi
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Andrea Rubalcava
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Rachel Morrison
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| | - Joanne E Mortimer
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Atagi S, Mizusawa J, Ishikura S, Takahashi T, Okamoto H, Tanaka H, Goto K, Nakagawa K, Harada M, Takeda Y, Nogami N, Fujita Y, Kasai T, Kishi K, Sawa T, Takeda K, Tomii K, Satouchi M, Seto T, Ohe Y. Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Trial (JCOG0301). Clin Lung Cancer 2018; 19:e619-e627. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Revised: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
32
|
Arciero VS, Cheng S, Mason R, McDonald E, Saluja R, Chan KKW. Do older and younger patients derive similar survival benefits from novel oncology drugs? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2018; 47:654-660. [PMID: 29788041 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background older patients are commonly believed to derive less benefit from cancer drugs, even if they fulfil clinical trial eligibility [Talarico et al. (2004, J Clin Oncol, 22(22):4626-31)]. We aim to examine if novel oncology drugs provide differential age-based treatment outcomes for patients on clinical trials. Methods a systematic review of randomised control trials (RCTs) cited for clinical efficacy evidence in novel oncology drug approvals by the Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency and Health Canada between 2006 and 2017 was conducted. Studies reporting age-based subgroup analyses for overall or progression-free survival (OS/PFS) were included. Hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for age-based subgroups were extracted. Meta-analyses with random effects were conducted, examining patient subgroups <65 and ≥65 years separately and pooled HRs of studies primary endpoints (OS or PFS) compared to examine if differences existed between age-based subgroups. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for cancer type, primary endpoint and systemic treatment. Results one-hundred-two RCTs, including 65,122 patients, met the inclusion criteria. One study reported age-based toxicity and none reported age-based quality of life (QOL) results. Pooled HRs [95% CIs] for patients <65 and ≥65 years were 0.61 [0.57-0.65] and 0.65 [0.61-0.70], respectively, with no difference between them (P = 0.14). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar results. Conclusion our results suggest that older and young patients, who fulfil clinical trial eligibility, may derive similar relative survival benefits from novel oncology drugs. There is, however, a need to report age-based toxicity and QOL results to support patient discussions regarding the balance of treatment benefit and harm, to encourage informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa S Arciero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sierra Cheng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Mason
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erica McDonald
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronak Saluja
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mohile SG, Dale W, Somerfield MR, Schonberg MA, Boyd CM, Burhenn PS, Canin B, Cohen HJ, Holmes HM, Hopkins JO, Janelsins MC, Khorana AA, Klepin HD, Lichtman SM, Mustian KM, Tew WP, Hurria A. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2326-2347. [PMID: 29782209 PMCID: PMC6063790 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.78.8687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 906] [Impact Index Per Article: 151.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide guidance regarding the practical assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older patients undergoing chemotherapy. Methods An Expert Panel was convened to develop clinical practice guideline recommendations based on a systematic review of the medical literature. Results A total of 68 studies met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the recommendations. Recommendations In patients ≥ 65 years receiving chemotherapy, geriatric assessment (GA) should be used to identify vulnerabilities that are not routinely captured in oncology assessments. Evidence supports, at a minimum, assessment of function, comorbidity, falls, depression, cognition, and nutrition. The Panel recommends instrumental activities of daily living to assess for function, a thorough history or validated tool to assess comorbidity, a single question for falls, the Geriatric Depression Scale to screen for depression, the Mini-Cog or the Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test to screen for cognitive impairment, and an assessment of unintentional weight loss to evaluate nutrition. Either the CARG (Cancer and Aging Research Group) or CRASH (Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients) tools are recommended to obtain estimates of chemotherapy toxicity risk; the Geriatric-8 or Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 can help to predict mortality. Clinicians should use a validated tool listed at ePrognosis to estimate noncancer-based life expectancy ≥ 4 years. GA results should be applied to develop an integrated and individualized plan that informs cancer management and to identify nononcologic problems amenable to intervention. Collaborating with caregivers is essential to implementing GA-guided interventions. The Panel suggests that clinicians take into account GA results when recommending chemotherapy and that the information be provided to patients and caregivers to guide treatment decision making. Clinicians should implement targeted, GA-guided interventions to manage nononcologic problems. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya G Mohile
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - William Dale
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mark R Somerfield
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Peggy S Burhenn
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Beverly Canin
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Harvey Jay Cohen
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Holly M Holmes
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Judith O Hopkins
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Michelle C Janelsins
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alok A Khorana
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Stuart M Lichtman
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Karen M Mustian
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - William P Tew
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Arti Hurria
- Supriya G. Mohile, Michelle C. Janelsins, and Karen M. Mustian, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester; Beverly Canin, Breast Cancer Options, Kingston; Stuart M. Lichtman and William P. Tew, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; William Dale, Peggy S. Burhenn, and Arti Hurria, City of Hope, Duarte, CA; Mark R. Somerfield, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Mara A. Schonberg, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brookline, MA; Cynthia M. Boyd, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Harvey Jay Cohen, Duke University Medical Center, Durham; Judith O. Hopkins, Novant Health Oncology Specialists; Heidi D. Klepin, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC; Holly M. Holmes, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX; and Alok A. Khorana, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mohile SG, Dale W, Somerfield MR, Hurria A. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology Summary. J Oncol Pract 2018; 14:442-446. [PMID: 29932846 PMCID: PMC6041128 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya G Mohile
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - William Dale
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Mark R Somerfield
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| | - Arti Hurria
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; City of Hope, Duarte, CA; and American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, de Glas NA, Hsu T, Kanesvaran R, Steer C, Navarrete-Reyes AP, Battisti NML, Chavarri-Guerra Y, O’Donovan A, Avila-Funes JA, Hurria A. Global geriatric oncology: Achievements and challenges. J Geriatr Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
36
|
Maggiore R, Zumsteg ZS, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Trevino KM, Gajra A, Korc-Grodzicki B, Epstein JB, Bond SM, Parker I, Kish JA, Murphy BA, VanderWalde NA. The Older Adult With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Knowledge Gaps and Future Direction in Assessment and Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:868-883. [PMID: 28602414 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) pose unique treatment and supportive care challenges to oncologists and other cancer care providers. The majority of patients with HNSCC present with locoregionally advanced disease, for which combined-modality treatment integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy is often necessary to maximize tumor control. However, applying these approaches to an older population with concomitant comorbidities and a higher risk of functional impairments remains challenging and is exacerbated by the paucity of studies involving older adults. The purpose of this article is to identify knowledge gaps in the evaluation and management of older adults with HNSCC-particularly those undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy-and their caregivers through a review of the literature conducted by clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. The findings highlight the importance of a geriatric assessment and the therapeutic paradigms and challenges relevant to this population. Furthermore, we identify the need for additional research and interventions related to key supportive care issues that arise during and after treatment in older adults with locoregionally advanced HNSCC. On the basis of our findings, we prioritize these issues to guide future patient-oriented research endeavors to address these knowledge gaps and thus better serve this growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Maggiore
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Zachary S Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Kelly M Trevino
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Ajeet Gajra
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University Cancer Center, Syracuse, New York
| | | | - Joel B Epstein
- Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stewart M Bond
- Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
| | - Ira Parker
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Julie A Kish
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Barbara A Murphy
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Noam A VanderWalde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-West Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
O'Donovan A, Leech M, Gillham C. Assessment and management of radiotherapy induced toxicity in older patients. J Geriatr Oncol 2017; 8:421-427. [PMID: 28739158 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Revised: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an attractive treatment option for older adults, especially where surgery and chemotherapy pose too great a risk. Radiotherapy toxicity may be divided into acute/early and late effects of treatment. The latter may have limited relevance to an older patient with competing causes of mortality due to significant comorbidity. Altered fractionation regimes have been employed in numerous sites, with no significant toxicity impact. These offer greater convenience in the elderly, especially those with limited social support or in active caregiving roles. As radiotherapy toxicity is site specific, it's important to assess baseline function via Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), and any pre-existing comorbidities that may influence toxicity. With modern radiotherapy technology and capabilities, these are less of an issue and radiotherapy is a very suitable treatment option for the older adult. When evaluating the literature on toxicity in older patients, it's important to recognise that older studies do not represent modern day radiotherapy techniques and capabilities. Advanced technology may simultaneously deliver enhanced target coverage and reduced toxicity. More research is required related to the predictive power of CGA in linking radiotherapy toxicity to frailty. What little evidence exists shows that CGA has a role in treatment of older patients with radiotherapy and that, in general, radiotherapy appears to be well tolerated in older adults. The purpose of this review is to provide a broad overview of the mechanisms of normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy and how radiation induced toxicity may affect older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita O'Donovan
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Michelle Leech
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Charles Gillham
- Saint Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Highfield Rd., Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Akechi T, Aiki S, Sugano K, Uchida M, Yamada A, Komatsu H, Ishida T, Kusumoto S, Iida S, Okuyama T. Does cognitive decline decrease health utility value in older adult patients with cancer? Psychogeriatrics 2017; 17:149-154. [PMID: 27411897 DOI: 10.1111/psyg.12205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM Cognitive decline is common among older adults with cancer. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of cognitive decline on health utility value in older adults suffering from cancer. METHODS Consecutive patients aged 65 years or older with a primary diagnosis of malignant lymphoma or multiple myeloma were recruited. Patients were asked to complete the EuroQoL-5 (EQ-5D) scale to measure health utility and the Mini-Mental State Examination to assess cognitive decline. The potential impact of cognitive decline was investigated with univariate analysis. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted to control for potential confounding factors. RESULTS Complete data were obtained from 87 patients, 29% of whom had cognitive decline. The mean ± SE EQ-5D score for patients with cognitive decline was significantly lower than that for those without cognitive decline (0.67 ± 0.04 vs 0.79 ± 0.03, t = 2.38, P = 0.02). However, multiple regression analysis showed that cognitive decline was not significantly associated with EQ-5D scores. Female sex and lower performance scores (worse physical condition) were significantly associated with EQ-5D scores. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive decline may be involved in decreased health utility value in older adult patients with cancer. However, this effect does not seem to be independent, and the patient's physical condition may be a relevant confounding factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuo Akechi
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.,Division of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Sayo Aiki
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Koji Sugano
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Megumi Uchida
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.,Division of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Atsuro Yamada
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Komatsu
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takashi Ishida
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shigeru Kusumoto
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Iida
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Toru Okuyama
- Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.,Division of Palliative Care and Psycho-oncology, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ruspi L, Galli F, Pappalardo V, Inversini D, Martignoni F, Boni L, Dionigi G, Rausei S. Lymphadenectomy in elderly/high risk patients: should it be different? Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2:5. [PMID: 28217755 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2016.12.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The global aging of population will lead a greater number of elderly patients to undergo surgical procedure in a near future. Concerning gastric cancer, the impact of lymphadenectomy on survival has been demonstrated in RCTs, and extended lymphadenectomy is now considered as gold standard of treatment in non-early tumors. However, the role of age as a prognostic factor and the benefit of extended surgery in elderly/high-risk patients are not clearly defined yet. From our revision of literature, it seems that surgery for gastric cancer may have a further tailorization, considering not only the stage of disease, but also patients' age and comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Ruspi
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Federica Galli
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pappalardo
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Davide Inversini
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Martignoni
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Luigi Boni
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Gianlorenzo Dionigi
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Stefano Rausei
- Department of General Surgery, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, 21100 Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Complete Response to Full-Dose Sorafenib Treatment in an Elderly HCC Patient: a Case Report. J Gastrointest Cancer 2016; 46:430-3. [PMID: 25894635 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-015-9720-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
41
|
Mohile SG, Hurria A, Cohen HJ, Rowland JH, Leach CR, Arora NK, Canin B, Muss HB, Magnuson A, Flannery M, Lowenstein L, Allore HG, Mustian KM, Demark-Wahnefried W, Extermann M, Ferrell B, Inouye SK, Studenski SA, Dale W. Improving the quality of survivorship for older adults with cancer. Cancer 2016; 122:2459-568. [PMID: 27172129 PMCID: PMC4974133 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
In May 2015, the Cancer and Aging Research Group, in collaboration with the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute on Aging through a U13 grant, convened a conference to identify research priorities to help design and implement intervention studies to improve the quality of life and survivorship of older, frailer adults with cancer. Conference attendees included researchers with multidisciplinary expertise and advocates. It was concluded that future intervention trials for older adults with cancer should: 1) rigorously test interventions to prevent the decline of or improve health status, especially interventions focused on optimizing physical performance, nutritional status, and cognition while undergoing cancer treatment; 2) use standardized care plans based on geriatric assessment findings to guide targeted interventions; and 3) incorporate the principles of geriatrics into survivorship care plans. Also highlighted was the need to integrate the expertise of interdisciplinary team members into geriatric oncology research, improve funding mechanisms to support geriatric oncology research, and disseminate high-impact results to the research and clinical community. In conjunction with the 2 prior U13 meetings, this conference provided the framework for future research to improve the evidence base for the clinical care of older adults with cancer. Cancer 2016;122:2459-68. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya G Mohile
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Arti Hurria
- Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Harvey J Cohen
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Julia H Rowland
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Corinne R Leach
- Office of Cancer Survivorship, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Neeraj K Arora
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC
| | | | - Hyman B Muss
- Breast Cancer, Geriatric Oncology Program, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Allison Magnuson
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Marie Flannery
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Lisa Lowenstein
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heather G Allore
- Department of Medicine and Public Health Services, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Karen M Mustian
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | | | - Martine Extermann
- Senior Adult Oncology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Betty Ferrell
- Department of Nursing, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Sharon K Inouye
- Institute of Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - William Dale
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bluhm M, Connell CM, Janz N, Bickel K, DeVries R, Silveira M. Oncologists’ End of Life Treatment Decisions. J Appl Gerontol 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/0733464815595510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Optimal treatment decisions for older end-stage cancer patients are complicated, and are influenced by oncologists’ attitudes and beliefs about older patients. Nevertheless, few studies have explored oncologists’ perspectives on how patient age affects their treatment decisions. Methods: In-depth interviews were conducted with 17 oncologists to examine factors that influence their chemotherapy decisions for adults with incurable cancer near death. Transcripts of recorded interviews were coded and content analyzed. Results: Oncologists identified patient age as a key factor in their chemotherapy decisions. They believed older adults were less likely to want or tolerate treatment, and felt highly motivated to treat younger patients. Discussion: Qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews resulted in a nuanced understanding of how patient age influences oncologists’ chemotherapy decisions. Such understanding may inform practice efforts aimed at enhancing cancer care at the end of life for older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kathleen Bickel
- Veterans Affairs White River Junction Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Nipp RD, Yao NA, Lowenstein LM, Buckner JC, Parker IR, Gajra A, Morrison VA, Dale W, Ballman KV. Pragmatic study designs for older adults with cancer: Report from the U13 conference. J Geriatr Oncol 2016; 7:234-41. [PMID: 27197914 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2015] [Revised: 12/30/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Cancer is a disease occurring disproportionately in older adults. However, the evidence base regarding how best to care for these patients remains limited due to their underrepresentation in cancer clinical trials. Pragmatic clinical trials represent a promising approach for enhancing the evidence base in geriatric oncology by allowing investigators to enroll older, frailer patients onto cancer clinical trials. These trials are more accessible, less resource intensive, and place minimal additional burden on participating patients. Additionally, these trials can be designed to measure endpoints directly relevant to older adults, such as quality of life, functional independence and treatment tolerability which are often not addressed in standard clinical trials. Therefore, pragmatic clinical trials allow researchers to include patients for whom the treatment will ultimately be applied and to utilize meaningful endpoints. Examples of pragmatic studies include both large, simple trials and cluster randomized trials. These study designs allow investigators to conduct clinical trials within the context of everyday practice. Further, researchers can devise these studies to place minimal burden on the patient, the treating clinicians and the participating institutions. In order to be successful, pragmatic trials must efficiently utilize the electronic medical record for data capture while also maximizing patient recruitment, enrollment and retention. Additionally, by strategically utilizing pragmatic clinical trials to test therapies and interventions that have previously shown efficacy in younger, fitter patients, these trials represent a potential mechanism to improve the evidence base in geriatric oncology and enhance care for older adults with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Nipp
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center & Harvard Medical School, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Oncology, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Nengliang Aaron Yao
- University of Virginia Cancer Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Lisa M Lowenstein
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Health Services Research, Division of OVP, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jan C Buckner
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ira R Parker
- Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ajeet Gajra
- SUNY Upstate University, Department of Medicine, Syracuse, NY, USA; VA Medical Center, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Vicki A Morrison
- University of Minnesota, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - William Dale
- University of Chicago, Section of Geriatrics & Palliative Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karla V Ballman
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kilari D, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Mohile SG, Alibhai SMH, Presley CJ, Wildes TM, Klepin HD, Demark-Wahnefried W, Jatoi A, Harrison R, Won E, Mustian KM. Designing exercise clinical trials for older adults with cancer: Recommendations from 2015 Cancer and Aging Research Group NCI U13 Meeting. J Geriatr Oncol 2016; 7:293-304. [PMID: 27197916 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Revised: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Cancer and its treatment can lead to a myriad of adverse events and negatively impact quality of life of older cancer patients and survivors. Unmet physical activity needs vary across the cancer continuum and remain an important yet understudied area of research in this population. Exercise interventions have been shown to be effective in treating both the physical and psychological declines associated with cancer and its treatment, with a potential to improve cancer-related outcomes. Despite the current evidence, exercise is clearly underutilized due to several barriers and knowledge gaps in existing trials that include appropriate population identification, design, and outcome measures selection. The benefits of regular exercise in both the primary and secondary prevention of chronic conditions are well established in the non-cancer population. In older cancer patients and survivors, further research is needed before exercise gains widespread acceptance. The Cancer and Aging Research Group convened experts in exercise, aging and cancer to evaluate current scientific evidence and knowledge gaps in geriatric exercise oncology. This report summarizes these findings and provides future research directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Kilari
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Clinical Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Cancer Care in the Elderly Clinic, Department of Geriatrics, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Supriya Gupta Mohile
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Shabbir M H Alibhai
- University Health Network and University of Toronto, Department of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carolyn J Presley
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Tanya M Wildes
- Washington University, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forrest School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Control and Prevention, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Amina Jatoi
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert Harrison
- University of Rochester Medical Center, SCOREboard, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth Won
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen M Mustian
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Division of Cancer Control, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Green AR, Boyd CM, Rickard J, Gomon R, Leff B. Attitudes of older adults with serious competing health risks toward their implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a pilot study. BMC Geriatr 2015; 15:173. [PMID: 26700296 PMCID: PMC4690308 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-015-0173-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2015] [Accepted: 12/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In elderly heart failure patients, the survival benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) may be attenuated due to competing health risks, and the risk of adverse outcomes magnified. Our objective was to examine older adults’ attitudes towards ICD implantation in the context of competing health risks, exploring the determinants of ICD decision-making among a group of patients who had faced the decision in the past. Methods Telephone survey with a qualitative component. Patients were age ≥70 with single- or dual-chamber ICDs from a single academic cardiac device clinic. Health status was assessed with the Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13). Responses to open-ended questions were transcribed verbatim; an “editing analysis” approach was used to extract themes. Results Forty-four ICD recipients participated (mean age 77.5 years). Nineteen participants (43 %) had VES-13 scores ≥3, indicating a 50 % likelihood of death or functional decline within 2 years. Twenty-one participants (48 %) had received prior ICD shocks. Forty participants (91 %) said they would “definitely” choose to get an ICD again in their current health. By and large, patients revealed a strong desire to extend life, expressed complete confidence in the lifesaving capabilities of their ICDs, and did not describe consideration of competing health risks. Conclusions In this pilot telephone survey with a qualitative component, nearly all older adults with ICDs would still choose to get an ICD despite high short-term risk of death or health deterioration. These findings suggest the need to partner more effectively with patients and families to decide how best to use medical technologies, particularly for older adults with competing risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel R Green
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, 7th floor, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, 7th floor, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - John Rickard
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 4940 Eastern Avenue, 301 building, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Robert Gomon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 4940 Eastern Avenue, 301 building, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| | - Bruce Leff
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 5200 Eastern Avenue, 7th floor, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA. .,Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. .,Department of Community and Public Health, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kim YS, Sym SJ, Baek MY, Park I, Hong J, Ahn HK, Park J, Cho EK, Lee WK, Chung M, Kim HS, Lee JH, Shin DB. Low-dose capecitabine plus trastuzumab as first-line treatment in patients 75 years of age or older with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: a pilot study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2015; 76:1267-72. [PMID: 26482716 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-015-2881-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-agent chemotherapy is considered a good and safe treatment option for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We investigated the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab plus low-dose capecitabine in elderly patients with previously untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive AGC. METHODS Patients aged 75 years or older with tumors having HER2 overexpression defined as either immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or IHC 2+ and in situ hybridization-positive were eligible for inclusion. Patients received capecitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) orally twice daily on days 1-14 and trastuzumab (8 mg/kg for cycle 1, followed by 6 mg/kg) intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Twenty patients were enrolled. The median age was 79 years (range 75-91). Nine patients (45 %) had ECOG performance status 2. Median PFS was 5.2 months (95 % CI 1.9-8.4 months), and median overall survival was 9.3 months (95 % CI 4.0-14.6 months). The confirmed response rate was 40 % (95 % CI 19-64 %) with disease control rate of 80 %. Grade 3-4 toxicities were anorexia (10 %), fatigue (5 %), stomatitis (5 %), and anemia (5 %). No treatment-related deaths or symptomatic congestive heart failure were observed. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose capecitabine plus trastuzumab is effective and well tolerated in elderly patients with HER2-positive AGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Saing Kim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Jin Sym
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Young Baek
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Inkeun Park
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Junshik Hong
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Kyung Ahn
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinny Park
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Cho
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Woon Ki Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Chung
- Department of General Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung-Sik Kim
- Department of Radiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Bok Shin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-706, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mohile SG, Velarde C, Hurria A, Magnuson A, Lowenstein L, Pandya C, O’Donovan A, Gorawara-Bhat R, Dale W. Geriatric Assessment-Guided Care Processes for Older Adults: A Delphi Consensus of Geriatric Oncology Experts. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 13:1120-30. [PMID: 26358796 PMCID: PMC4630807 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Structured care processes that provide a framework for how oncologists can incorporate geriatric assessment (GA) into clinical practice could improve outcomes for vulnerable older adults with cancer, a growing population at high risk of toxicity from cancer treatment. We sought to obtain consensus from an expert panel on the use of GA in clinical practice and to develop algorithms of GA-guided care processes. METHODS The Delphi technique, a well-recognized structured and reiterative process to reach consensus, was used. Participants were geriatric oncology experts who attended NIH-funded U13 or Cancer and Aging Research Group conferences. Consensus was defined as an interquartile range of 2 or more units, or 66.7% or greater, selecting a utility/helpfulness rating of 7 or greater on a 10-point Likert scale. For nominal data, consensus was defined as agreement among 66.7% or more of the group. RESULTS From 33 invited, 30 participants completed all 3 rounds. Most experts (75%) used GA in clinical care, and the remainder were involved in geriatric oncology research. The panel met consensus that "all patients aged 75 years or older and those who are younger with age-related health concerns" should undergo GA and that all domains (function, physical performance, comorbidity/polypharmacy, cognition, nutrition, psychological status, and social support) should be included. Consensus was met for how GA could guide nononcologic interventions and cancer treatment decisions. Algorithms for GA-guided care processes were developed. CONCLUSIONS This Delphi investigation of geriatric oncology experts demonstrated that GA should be performed for older patients with cancer to guide care processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Gupta Mohile
- James Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14620
| | - Carla Velarde
- James Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14620
| | - Arti Hurria
- City of Hope Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010
| | - Allison Magnuson
- James Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14620
| | - Lisa Lowenstein
- James Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14620
| | - Chintan Pandya
- James Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 704, Rochester, NY 14620
| | | | - Rita Gorawara-Bhat
- Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago, MC6098, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
| | - William Dale
- Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago, MC6098, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Guancial EA, Roussel B, Bergsma DP, Bylund KC, Sahasrabudhe D, Messing E, Mohile SG, Fung C. Bladder cancer in the elderly patient: challenges and solutions. Clin Interv Aging 2015; 10:939-49. [PMID: 26089655 PMCID: PMC4467651 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s74322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is an age-associated malignancy with increased prevalence in the elderly population. Elderly patients are a vulnerable population at increased risk for treatment-related toxicity secondary to medical comorbidities and geriatric syndromes. As a result, this population has been historically undertreated and suffers worse disease-specific outcomes than younger patients with BC. Recognition of this disparity has led to efforts to individualize treatment decisions based on functional status rather than chronologic age in an effort to optimize the use of curative therapies for the fit elderly and modify treatments to reduce the risk of toxicity and disease-related morbidity in vulnerable or frail patients. The comprehensive geriatric assessment is a decision framework that helps to balance underlying health considerations and risks of therapy with aggressiveness of the cancer. Development of systemic therapies with increased efficacy against BC and reduced toxicity are eagerly awaited, as are techniques and interventions to reduce the morbidity from surgery and radiation for patients with BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Guancial
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Breton Roussel
- Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Derek P Bergsma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Kevin C Bylund
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Deepak Sahasrabudhe
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Edward Messing
- Department of Urology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Chunkit Fung
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chapman A, MacKenzie A, Parker I. Silver oncologic tsunami: quality issues in the senior adult oncology population. J Oncol Pract 2015; 11:190-2. [PMID: 25901053 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2015.004309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The interface between cancer and aging has been explored in research conducted over the past 10 years. Critical topics relevant to the biology of aging and cancer include: immune senescence, telomere shortening, and roles of chronic inflammation and antigen stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Chapman
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; and La Jolla, CA
| | - Amy MacKenzie
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; and La Jolla, CA
| | - Ira Parker
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; and La Jolla, CA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cardenal F, Nadal E, Jové M, Faivre-Finn C. Concurrent systemic therapy with radiotherapy for the treatment of poor-risk patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of the literature. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:278-88. [PMID: 24942274 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach to poor-risk patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), despite the increasing number of these patients in current clinical practice. In terms of survival, the combination of concurrent systemic therapy with standard radiotherapy might be advantageous over radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this review is to ascertain the feasibility, safety and efficacy of the combination of concurrent systemic therapy and standard radiotherapy in these patients. METHODS A computer-based literature search was carried out using PubMed and Science Direct for relevant publications; data reported at major conferences in abstract form were also included. RESULTS In unresectable stage III NSCLC, advanced age, poor performance status, weight loss and comorbidities are factors that influence treatment options and disease outcomes in clinical practice. Prospective studies including poor-risk patients have been reviewed. Trials specifically recruiting poor-risk patients have been separated into those using chemotherapy and those using targeted agents with or without chemotherapy. Only two phase III studies specifically including poor-risk patients have been published. Some recent studies suggested that tolerable radio-sensitizing therapy combined with radiotherapy can provide longer survival outcomes than those reported earlier with chemo-radiotherapy or with radiotherapy alone. CONCLUSIONS There is an unmet need to develop well-designed clinical trials with tolerable combinations of systemic therapy and radiotherapy specifically tailored to this lung cancer population. Such trials should incorporate careful comorbidity measurement and, in older adults, a validated geriatric assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cardenal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Nadal
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - M Jové
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Faivre-Finn
- Radiation Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|