Development of an abbreviated symptom score for the neonatal abstinence syndrome

Abstinence scoring algorithms for treatment of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS)

OBJECTIVE

Chervoneva et al. (2020) developed an abbreviated score (sMNAS-9) derived from full modified Finnegan MOTHER NAS scale (MNAS) for evaluating severity of NOWS. We sought to develop NOWS treatment algorithms for clinical decision rules based on scores utilizing the shorter sMNAS.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of 373 infants with NOWS scored with MNAS and treated with morphine between 2007 and 2016. The infants were randomly split into training/test sets. The training set was used to derive optimized cutoff values for sMNAS-9 scores. The independent set evaluated the sMNAS-9 clinical decision rules based on full MNAS in NOWS morphine and buprenorphine treatment algorithms.

RESULT

Clinical decision rules based on sMNAS-9 yielded sensitivities of 88% or higher and specificities of 85% or higher for predicting the respective rules based on full MNAS.

CONCLUSION

The sMNAS-9 scoring instrument is expected to yield similar clinical decisions in treatment of NOWS.

Neonatal Abstinence Signs during Treatment: Trajectory, Resurgence and Heterogeneity

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) presents with a varying severity of withdrawal signs and length of treatment (LOT). We examined the course and relevance of each of the NAS withdrawal signs during treatment in a sample of 182 infants with any prenatal opioid exposure, gestational age ≥ 35 weeks, without other medical conditions, and meeting the criteria for pharmacological treatment. Infants were monitored using the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool. Daily mean Finnegan scores were estimated using linear mixed models with random subject effects to account for repeated withdrawal scores from the same subject. Daily item prevalence was estimated using generalized estimating equations with a within-subject exchangeable correlation structure. The median LOT was 12.86 days. The prevalence of withdrawal signs decreased from day one to day three of treatment. However, certain central nervous system (CNS) and gastrointestinal (GI) signs showed sporadic increases in prevalence notable around two weeks of treatment, accounting for increases in Finnegan scores that guided pharmacotherapy. We question whether the resurgence of signs with a prolonged LOT is mainly a consequence of opioid tolerance or withdrawal. Monitoring CNS and GI signs throughout treatment is crucial. Future studies directed to better understand this clinical phenomenon may lead to the refining of NAS pharmacotherapy and perhaps the discovery of treatment alternatives.

Advances in the Care of Infants With Prenatal Opioid Exposure and Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome

A significant number of advances have been made in the last 5 years with respect to the identification, diagnosis, assessment, and management of infants with prenatal opioid exposure and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) from birth to early childhood. The primary objective of this review is to summarize major advances that will inform the clinical management of opioid-exposed newborns and provide an overview of NOWS care to promote the implementation of best practices. First, advances with respect to standardizing the clinical diagnosis of NOWS will be reviewed. Second, the most commonly used assessment strategies are discussed, with a focus on presenting new quality improvement and clinical trial data surrounding the use of the new function-based assessment Eat, Sleep, and Console approach. Third, both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment modalities are reviewed, highlighting clinical trials that have compared the use of higher calorie and low lactose formula, vibrating crib mattresses, morphine compared with methadone, buprenorphine compared with morphine or methadone, the use of ondansetron as a medication to prevent the need for NOWS opioid pharmacologic treatment, and the introduction of symptom-triggered dosing compared with scheduled dosing. Fourth, maternal, infant, environmental, and genetic factors that have been found to be associated with NOWS severity are highlighted. Finally, emerging recommendations on postdelivery hospitalization follow-up and developmental surveillance are presented, along with highlighting ongoing and needed areas of research to promote infant and family well-being for families impacted by opioid use.

Improving Outcomes in Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome With the Eat, Sleep, Console Method

BACKGROUND

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a significant public health concern. A quality improvement project was executed in a neonatal intensive care unit at a large urban hospital. The aim was to address the prolonged hospitalization of infants and exposure to medications to treat NAS.

PURPOSE

The goal was to determine whether the eat, sleep, console (ESC) method decreases the length of stay (LOS) and morphine usage when compared with the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (FNASS).

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were 36 weeks' or longer gestation and exposure to opiates in utero. The FNASS method was replaced by the ESC method with a refocus on nonpharmacologic care. Data were collected for 6 months during implementation of the ESC method and compared with the 6 months prior to implementation.

RESULTS

The results of the project include: the average LOS decreased from 25.9 days to 13.7 days, a 47% reduction; the rate of scheduled morphine initiation decreased from 58% to 7%, an 88% reduction; as-needed morphine initiation decreased from 33% to 7%, a 79% reduction; and the rate of adjunctive medication initiation decreased from 17% to 0%, a 100% reduction.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

The outcomes of LOS and rate of morphine usage were significantly improved when using the ESC method when compared with the FNASS at this facility. The results support future implications including expanding the ESC program to the well newborn population at this facility and other similar units. Further research needs to be done on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Eat, Sleep, Console Approach or Usual Care for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal

BACKGROUND

Although clinicians have traditionally used the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool to assess the severity of neonatal opioid withdrawal, a newer function-based approach - the Eat, Sleep, Console care approach - is increasing in use. Whether the new approach can safely reduce the time until infants are medically ready for discharge when it is applied broadly across diverse sites is unknown.

METHODS

In this cluster-randomized, controlled trial at 26 U.S. hospitals, we enrolled infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome who had been born at 36 weeks' gestation or more. At a randomly assigned time, hospitals transitioned from usual care that used the Finnegan tool to the Eat, Sleep, Console approach. During a 3-month transition period, staff members at each hospital were trained to use the new approach. The primary outcome was the time from birth until medical readiness for discharge as defined by the trial. Composite safety outcomes that were assessed during the first 3 months of postnatal age included in-hospital safety, unscheduled health care visits, and nonaccidental trauma or death.

RESULTS

A total of 1305 infants were enrolled. In an intention-to-treat analysis that included 837 infants who met the trial definition for medical readiness for discharge, the number of days from birth until readiness for hospital discharge was 8.2 in the Eat, Sleep, Console group and 14.9 in the usual-care group (adjusted mean difference, 6.7 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7 to 8.8), for a rate ratio of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.65; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse outcomes was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with usual care, use of the Eat, Sleep, Console care approach significantly decreased the number of days until infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome were medically ready for discharge, without increasing specified adverse outcomes. (Funded by the Helping End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Initiative of the National Institutes of Health; ESC-NOW ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04057820.).

The Eat, Sleep, Console Method: A Literature Review

Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is a significant public health problem in the United States. The most commonly used tool to assess and treat infants with NAS is the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (FNASS). The more recently developed Eat, Sleep, Console (ESC) method simplifies assessment of NAS. Current research suggests promising outcomes with the ESC method in areas such as length of hospital stay (LOS) and amount of medication needed to treat NAS. A literature review was conducted to answer the following question: In newborn infants with NAS born at 36 weeks of gestation or older, does the ESC method reduce the use of medication and LOS when compared with the FNASS? All of the studies reporting on LOS and medication usage rates reported a decrease in both when moving to the ESC method from FNASS.

Assessment of the relative clinical utility of shortened Finnegan neonatal abstinence scoring tools

OBJECTIVE

To assess the proposed shortened tools based on the Finnegan neonatal abstinence scoring tool (FNAS) for relative clinical utility.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study comparing shortened tools with FNAS on need for treatment, medication initiation cutoff score agreement, and length of treatment in 369 infants with prenatal opioid exposure using estimated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves, Pearson and Spearman correlations, and proportion correctly classified, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

The tools by Gomez et al. and Chervoneva et al. are most predictive of the FNAS cut-off values to initiate treatment, have cutoff values that best align with the FNAS cutoff values, and strongly correlate with the FNAS (r ≥ 0.88 corresponding to treatment initiation, r ≥ 0.83 during first 10 days of treatment).

CONCLUSION

The tools of Gomez and Chervoneva demonstrated potential clinical usefulness by strongly associating with the need for treatment and monitoring the course of NAS therapy.

Opioids and the developing brain: time to rethink perinatal care for infants of opioid-dependent mothers

Illicit use of opioids is a global health crisis with major implications for women and children. Strategies for managing opioid use disorder (OUD) in pregnancy have been tested over the past 40 years, but studies have focused on maternal and pregnancy outcomes, with less attention given to long-term follow-up of exposed children. Here, we provide a narrative review of recent advances in the assessment and management of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), and we summarise evidence from multiple domains-neuroimaging, electrophysiology, visual development and function, neurodevelopment, behaviour, cognition and education-which suggests that prenatal opioid exposure modifies child development. Further studies are required to determine the optimal management of pregnant women with OUD and babies with NOWS. We identify knowledge gaps and suggest that future study designs should evaluate childhood outcomes, including infant brain development and long-term neurocognitive and visual function.

Improving the Assessment of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS)

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) is a public health problem of epidemic proportions. The Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (FNASS) is the tool most widely used to evaluate NAS. However, it is limited by its lack of interrater reliability and standardized approach. Surveys to evaluate the FNASS were distributed to nurses at the Women and Infants Hospital in Providence, RI, USA. Infants (n = 78) treated for NAS and born to methadone-maintained mothers were examined to compare items administered from the FNASS and the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS). All nurses reported that the FNASS was somewhat to very subjective. More than half reported that it was somewhat to not accurate and a new scoring method is needed to accurately diagnose NAS. Correlations between FNASS items and NNNS items showed 9 of 32 (28.1%) correlations were strong (rs > 0.5), 5 of 32 (15.6%) were moderate (0.3 < rs < 0.5), and 10 of 32 (31.3%) were weak (0.1 < rs < 0.3). Principal component factor analysis (PCA) of the NNNS explained more variance (35.1%) than PCA of NNNS and FNASS items combined (33.1%). The nursing survey supported the need for developing a more objective exam to assess NAS. NNNS exam items may be used to improve the evaluation of NAS.

Escaping the Finnegan - Is it time?

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) has significantly increased worldwide secondary to a marked increase in the incidence of opioid use disorders (OUD) in women of childbearing age. Since first described in 1975, the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring Tool (FNAST) remains the mainstay of monitoring NAS severity and its clinical management. The complexity of the tool (21 independent variables), the need for external validation, excessive subjectivity, poor inter-rater reliability, and uncertainty regarding the clinical relevance of some items has resulted in the need to develop an alternate scoring tool. A validated, simple, clinically relevant, and universally accepted approach to assessing opioid exposed neonates would facilitate high quality clinical care while assisting in the generation of generalizable data from future research studies conducted in this vulnerable population.