1
|
Acevedo N, Rossell S, Castle D, Groves C, Cook M, McNeill P, Olver J, Meyer D, Perera T, Bosanac P. Clinical outcomes of deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: Insight as a predictor of symptom changes. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2024; 78:131-141. [PMID: 37984432 PMCID: PMC10952286 DOI: 10.1111/pcn.13619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
AIM Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a safe and effective treatment option for people with refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Yet our understanding of predictors of response and prognostic factors remains rudimentary, and long-term comprehensive follow-ups are lacking. We aim to investigate the efficacy of DBS therapy for OCD patients, and predictors of clinical response. METHODS Eight OCD participants underwent DBS stimulation of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in an open-label longitudinal trial, duration of follow-up varied between 9 months and 7 years. Post-operative care involved comprehensive fine tuning of stimulation parameters and adjunct multidisciplinary therapy. RESULTS Six participants achieved clinical response (35% improvement in obsessions and compulsions on the Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS)) within 6-9 weeks, response was maintained at last follow up. On average, the YBOCS improved by 45% at last follow up. Mixed linear modeling elucidated directionality of symptom changes: insight into symptoms strongly predicted (P = 0.008) changes in symptom severity during DBS therapy, likely driven by initial changes in depression and anxiety. Precise localization of DBS leads demonstrated that responders most often had their leads (and active contacts) placed dorsal compared to non-responders, relative to the Nac. CONCLUSION The clinical efficacy of DBS for OCD is demonstrated, and mediators of changes in symptoms are proposed. The symptom improvements within this cohort should be seen within the context of the adjunct psychological and biopsychosocial care that implemented a shared decision-making approach, with flexible iterative DBS programming. Further research should explore the utility of insight as a clinical correlate of response. The trial was prospectively registered with the ANZCTR (ACTRN12612001142820).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Acevedo
- Centre for Mental HealthSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- St Vincent's HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Susan Rossell
- Centre for Mental HealthSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- St Vincent's HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - David Castle
- St Vincent's HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of TorontoTorontoOntarioCanada
| | | | - Mark Cook
- St Vincent's HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | | | - James Olver
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Denny Meyer
- Centre for Mental HealthSwinburne University of TechnologyMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Thushara Perera
- Bionics InstituteEast MelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of Medical BionicsThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Peter Bosanac
- St Vincent's HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acevedo N, Castle D, Rossell S. The promise and challenges of transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation as therapeutic options for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:145-158. [PMID: 38247445 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2306875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) represents a complex and often difficult to treat disorder. Pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions are often associated with sub-optimal outcomes, and 40-60% of patients are resistant to first line therapies and thus left with few treatment options. OCD is underpinned by aberrant neurocircuitry within cortical, striatal, and thalamic brain networks. Considering the neurocircuitry impairments that underlie OCD symptomology, neurostimulation therapies provide an opportunity to modulate psychopathology in a personalized manner. Also, by probing pathological neural networks, enhanced understanding of disease states can be obtained. AREAS COVERED This perspective discusses the clinical efficacy of TMS and DBS therapies, treatment access options, and considerations and challenges in managing patients. Recent scientific progress is discussed, with a focus on neurocircuitry and biopsychosocial aspects. Translational recommendations and suggestions for future research are provided. EXPERT OPINION There is robust evidence to support TMS and DBS as an efficacious therapy for treatment resistant OCD patients supported by an excellent safety profile and favorable health economic data. Despite a great need for alternative therapies for chronic and severe OCD patients, resistance toward neurostimulation therapies from regulatory bodies and the psychiatric community remains. The authors contend for greater access to TMS and DBS for treatment resistant OCD patients at specialized sites with appropriate clinical resources, particularly considering adjunct and follow-up care. Also, connectome targeting has shown robust predictive ability of symptom improvements and holds potential in advancing personalized neurostimulation therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Acevedo
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - David Castle
- Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
- Centre for Mental Health Innovation, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
- Statewide Mental Health Service, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Susan Rossell
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Acevedo N, Castle DJ, Bosanac P, Rossell SL. Call to revise the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists' clinical memorandum on deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2023; 57:1304-1307. [PMID: 37395129 PMCID: PMC10517578 DOI: 10.1177/00048674231184410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Acevedo
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Peter Bosanac
- Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Susan L Rossell
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pham MT, Campbell TA, Dorfman N, Torgerson L, Kostick-Quenet K, Blumenthal-Barby J, Storch EA, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Clinician Perspectives on Levels of Evidence and Oversight for Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Childhood OCD. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord 2023; 39:100830. [PMID: 37781644 PMCID: PMC10538479 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 10-20% of children with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) have treatment-resistant presentations, and there is likely interest in developing interventions for this patient group, which may include deep brain stimulation (DBS). The World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery has argued that at least two successful randomized controlled trials should be available before DBS treatment for a psychiatric disorder is considered "established." The FDA approved DBS for adults with treatment-resistant OCD under a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) in 2009, which requires that a device be used to manage or treat a condition impacting 8,000 or fewer patients annually in the United States. DBS is currently offered to children ages 7 and older with treatment-resistant dystonia under an HDE. Ethical and empirical work are needed to evaluate whether and under what conditions it might be appropriate to offer DBS for treatment-resistant childhood OCD. To address this gap, we report qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 25 clinicians with expertise in this area. First, we report clinician perspectives on acceptable levels of evidence to offer DBS in this patient population. Second, we describe their perspectives on institutional policies or protocols that might be needed to effectively provide care for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle T Pham
- Center for Bioethics and Social Justice, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Fee Hall 965 Wilson Road Rm A-126, East Lansing, MI 48824, United States
| | - Tiffany A Campbell
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
| | - Natalie Dorfman
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Laura Torgerson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Kristin Kostick-Quenet
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Suite 326D, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Eric A Storch
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1977 Butler Blvd Suite E4.100, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bandelow B, Allgulander C, Baldwin DS, Costa DLDC, Denys D, Dilbaz N, Domschke K, Hollander E, Kasper S, Möller HJ, Eriksson E, Fineberg NA, Hättenschwiler J, Kaiya H, Karavaeva T, Katzman MA, Kim YK, Inoue T, Lim L, Masdrakis V, Menchón JM, Miguel EC, Nardi AE, Pallanti S, Perna G, Rujescu D, Starcevic V, Stein DJ, Tsai SJ, Van Ameringen M, Vasileva A, Wang Z, Zohar J. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for treatment of anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and posttraumatic stress disorders - Version 3. Part II: OCD and PTSD. World J Biol Psychiatry 2023; 24:118-134. [PMID: 35900217 DOI: 10.1080/15622975.2022.2086296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM This is the third version of the guideline of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Task Force for the Pharmacological Treatment of Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders which was published in 2002 and revised in 2008. METHOD A consensus panel of 34 international experts representing 22 countries developed recommendations based on efficacy and acceptability of the treatments. In this version, not only medications but also psychotherapies and other non-pharmacological interventions were evaluated, applying the same rigorous methods that are standard for the assessment of medication treatments. RESULT The present paper (Part II) contains recommendations based on published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment of OCD (n = 291) and PTSD (n = 234) in children, adolescents, and adults. The accompanying paper (Part I) contains the recommendations for the treatment of anxiety disorders.For OCD, first-line treatments are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Internet-CBT was also superior to active controls. Several second-line medications are available, including clomipramine. For treatment-resistant cases, several options are available, including augmentation of SSRI treatment with antipsychotics and other drugs.Other non-pharmacological treatments, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and others were also evaluated.For PTSD, SSRIs and the SNRI venlafaxine are first-line treatments. CBT is the psychotherapy modality with the best body of evidence. For treatment-unresponsive patients, augmentation of SSRI treatment with antipsychotics may be an option. CONCLUSION OCD and PTSD can be effectively treated with CBT and medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borwin Bandelow
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
| | | | - David S Baldwin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Lucas da Conceição Costa
- Department and Institute of Psychiatry, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Damiaan Denys
- Afdeling Psychiatrie, Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nesrin Dilbaz
- Psikiyatri Uzmanı, Üsküdar Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Psikiyatri ABD İstanbul, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Katharina Domschke
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Siegfried Kasper
- Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Medical, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hans-Jürgen Möller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of München, München, Germany
| | - Elias Eriksson
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Naomi A Fineberg
- School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hisanobu Kaiya
- Department of Psychiatry, Kyoto Prefactual Medical College, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tatiana Karavaeva
- V.M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Ministry of Health, Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Education, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.,Federal State Budgetary Institution of Higher Education St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Martin A Katzman
- S.T.A.R.T. CLINIC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Adler Graduate Professional School Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Northern Ontario School of Medicine Thunder Bay, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yong-Ku Kim
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Takeshi Inoue
- Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Leslie Lim
- Department of Psychiatry, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vasilios Masdrakis
- First Department of Psychiatry, Eginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - José M Menchón
- Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, Cibersam, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Euripedes C Miguel
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Antônio E Nardi
- Institute of Psychiatry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Giampaolo Perna
- Department of Biological Sciences, Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy
| | - Dan Rujescu
- Clinical Division of General Psychiatry Medical, University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Vladan Starcevic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dan J Stein
- SA MRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department Psychiatry and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Shih-Jen Tsai
- Department of Psychiatry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Michael Van Ameringen
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Vasileva
- V. M. Bekhterev National Medical Research Center for Psychiatry and Neurology, Ministry of Health, I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Zhen Wang
- Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|