Contraception across transgender

Gender-affirming pharmacotherapy and additional health considerations: A contemporary review

BACKGROUND

Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals in the United States face health care disparities compounded with discrimination and limited access to necessary medical services. Gender-affirming interventions have been shown to mitigate gender dysphoria and psychiatric comorbidities, yet United States legislation limiting such interventions has increased. As medication experts, pharmacists can facilitate access to care and appropriate use of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and educate other health care providers on best practices for caring for TGD individuals in a variety of settings.

OBJECTIVES

To provide pharmacists with a contemporary review of GAHT and associated medication-related concerns.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for articles published until December 2022. MeSH terms such as transgender, transsexual, gender diverse, gender variant, or gender nonconforming in combination with phrases like gender-affirming care, treatment, pharmacotherapy, or hormone therapy were used to capture desired articles.

RESULTS

Feminizing hormone therapy (FHT), such as estrogen and antiandrogen agents, increases female secondary sex characteristics while suppressing male secondary sex characteristics. Masculinizing hormone therapy (MHT) achieves male secondary sex characteristics and minimizes female secondary sex characteristics using testosterone. For both FHT and MHT, the choice of therapy and formulation ultimately involves the patient's treatment goals, preferences, and tolerability. GAHT has additional health considerations pertaining to renal drug dosing, fertility, cardiovascular, and cancer risks. Pharmacists may provide crucial guidance and education to both patients and health care providers regarding risks associated with GAHT.

CONCLUSION

Many pharmacists feel unprepared to help provide, manage, and optimize GAHT. For many TGD individuals, GAHT is medically necessary and a life-saving treatment. Therefore, pharmacists should be provided tools to close knowledge gaps and improve their ability to care for these patients. By offering a thorough updated overview of GAHT, pharmacists can gain confidence to provide appropriate care for this increasingly visible population.

Practice and development of male contraception: European Academy of Andrology and American Society of Andrology guidelines

BACKGROUNDS

Despite a wide spectrum of contraceptive methods for women, the unintended pregnancy rate remains high (45% in the US), with 50% resulting in abortion. Currently, 20% of global contraceptive use is male-directed, with a wide variation among countries due to limited availability and lack of efficacy. Worldwide studies indicate that >50% of men would opt to use a reversible method, and 90% of women would rely on their partner to use a contraceptive. Additional reasons for novel male contraceptive methods to be available include the increased life expectancy, sharing the reproductive risks among partners, social issues, the lack of pharma industry involvement and the lack of opinion makers advocating for male contraception.

AIM

The present guidelines aim to review the status regarding male contraception, the current state of the art to support the clinical practice, recommend minimal requirements for new male contraceptive development and provide and grade updated, evidence-based recommendations from the European Society of Andrology (EAA) and the American Society of Andrology (ASA).

METHODS

An expert panel of academicians appointed by the EAA and the ASA generated a consensus guideline according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.

RESULTS

Sixty evidence-based and graded recommendations were produced on couple-centered communication, behaviors, barrier methods, semen analysis and contraceptive efficacy, physical agents, surgical methods, actions before initiating male contraception, hormonal methods, non-hormonal methods, vaccines, and social and ethical considerations.

CONCLUSION

As gender roles transform and gender equity is established in relationships, the male contribution to family planning must be facilitated. Efficient and safe male-directed methods must be evaluated and introduced into clinical practice, preferably reversible, either hormonal or non-hormonal. From a future perspective, identifying new hormonal combinations, suitable testicular targets, and emerging vas occlusion methods will produce novel molecules and products for male contraception.

The Importance of Safely Prescribing Hormones in the Transgender Community

The transgender community is rapidly growing, necessitating further education and understanding of their unique healthcare needs. Gender affirmation is a multistep process, which generally begins with transgender individuals socially transitioning by adopting a new name, pronouns, and appearance changes, such as hair and clothing, to express themselves. Additional gender affirmation treatment can be achieved through medical therapy with hormones and surgical intervention. Here, we report the case of an 18-year-old transgender man who presented to his primary care provider for a referral to initiate a medical transition with testosterone therapy. The patient practiced penetrative vaginal sex without contraception. The patient presented to the clinic eight months later with amenorrhea, thick coarse facial and body hair, oily skin, irritable moods, and a 20-lb weight gain. A pregnancy test revealed a positive result. A healthy baby girl was delivered at 40 weeks' gestation. This case demonstrates the importance of addressing contraception during the masculinization process in individuals who continue to practice vaginal intercourse. Healthcare providers should seek to establish a clinical environment free of discrimination and stigma to allow patients to feel comfortable describing potential triggers of gender dysphoria. We encourage medical practitioners to discuss all methods of birth control with transgender male patients and choose the contraceptive that best allows for a seamless medical transition.

[Ethical implications of supporting trans or questioning children and adolescents: Articulation with reproductive health]

Supporting children and adolescents who are trans or who are questioning cannot be done without an ethical reflection on one's own practice as a health professional. It is important to consider the young person as a whole, including reproductive health issues. This article proposes, through the principles of Beauchamps and Childress, an ethical reflection on the issues of beneficence - not maleficence, and of autonomy and justice for adolescents, young adults, and future trans or questioning parents. For adolescents, concerning the possibilities of medical treatment of gender affirmation, we need to propose information in terms of impact on fertility and, if necessary, proposals for the possibilities of preserving their reproductive capacities. These issues require to question the state of scientific knowledge in terms of parenthood of trans people and questioning. We propose here a state of knowledge of these realities, put in perspectives of the axes of ethical reflections inherent to guidance. In fine, it appears that the major ethical stake concerns the child to be born. Finally, it is necessary to consider the quality of life of the future parents and the impact of their medical follow-up.

Hormonothérapies de transition chez les personnes transgenres

Aujourd’hui encore, la prise en charge médicale des personnes transgenres pâtit d’une insuffisance d’offre de soins et de formation des soignants. La mise en œuvre d’une hormonothérapie est souvent souhaitée par les personnes transgenres et il est nécessaire qu’un médecin sache l’instaurer et la suivre tout au long de la transition. Nous abordons dans cette revue le traitement hormonal féminisant (THF) chez les femmes transgenres adultes, et le traitement hormonal masculinisant (THM) chez les hommes transgenres adultes.

Contraceptive Counseling for the Transgender Patient Assigned Female at Birth

Although almost 0.7% of the Brazilian population identifies as transgender, there is currently no training for healthcare professionals to provide comprehensive care to these patients, including the discussion of reproductive planning. The use of testosterone promotes amenorrhea in the first months of use; however, this effect does not guarantee contraceptive efficacy, and, consequently, increases the risks of unplanned pregnancy. The present article is an integrative review with the objective of evaluating and organizing the approach of contraceptive counseling for the transgender population who were assigned female at birth. We used the PubMed and Embase databases for our search, as well as international guidelines on care for the transgender population. Of 88 articles, 7 were used to develop the contraceptive counseling model. The model follows the following steps: 1. Addressing the information related to the need for contraception; 2. Evaluation of contraindications to the use of contraceptive methods (hormonal and nonhormonal); and 3. Side effects and possible discomfort associated with the use of contraception. The contraceptive counseling model is composed of 18 questions that address the indications and contraindications to the use of these methods, and a flowchart to assist patients in choosing a method that suits their needs.

SIGIS-SIAMS-SIE position statement of gender affirming hormonal treatment in transgender and non-binary people

PURPOSE

Gender Incongruence (GI) is a marked and persistent incongruence between an individual's experienced and the assigned gender at birth. In the recent years, there has been a considerable evolution and change in attitude as regards to gender nonconforming people.

METHODS

According to the Italian Society of Gender, Identity and Health (SIGIS), the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE) rules, a team of experts on the topic has been nominated by a SIGIS-SIAMS-SIE Guideline Board on the basis of their recognized clinical and research expertise in the field, and coordinated by a senior author, has prepared this Position statement. Later on, the present manuscript has been submitted to the Journal of Endocrinological Investigation for the normal process of international peer reviewing after a first internal revision process made by the SIGIS-SIAMS-SIE Guideline Board.

RESULTS

In the present document by the SIGIS-SIAMS-SIE group, we propose experts opinions concerning the psychological functioning, gender affirming hormonal treatment, safety concerns, emerging issues in transgender healthcare (sexual health, fertility issues, elderly trans people), and an Italian law overview aimed to improve gender non-conforming people care.

CONCLUSION

In this Position statement, we propose experts opinions concerning the psychological functioning of transgender people, the gender-affirming hormonal treatment (full/partial masculinization in assigned female at birth trans people, full/partial feminization and de-masculinization in assigned male at birth trans people), the emerging issues in transgender health care aimed to improve patient care. We have also included an overview of Italian law about gender affirming surgery and registry rectification.

Still no pill for men? Double standards & demarcating values in biomedical research

Double standards are widespread throughout biomedicine, especially in research on reproductive health. One of the clearest cases of double standards involves the feminine gendering of reproductive responsibility for contraception and the continued lack of highly effective, reversible methods for cisgender men. While the biomedical establishment accepts diversity and inclusion as important social values for clinical trials, their continued use of inequitable standards undermines their ability to challenge unfair social hierarchies by developing male contraception. Thus, the gender/sex bias present in contraceptive research raises the "New Demarcation Problem": If we accept that values can and will play important roles in science, how can we nevertheless distinguish positive influences of values from more corrosive bias? I argue that biomedical researchers ought to aim their clinical trials at equity and utilize methodologies that actually achieve that aim. More specifically, I contend that we can avoid the problem of double standards by gender/sex in contraceptive research by utilizing more equitable standards. My demarcation strategy captures dynamic interplay between values and their effects, with direct policy implications for institutions conducting, funding, and evaluating clinical trials. For male contraceptive trials, this involves shifting risk assessment from an individual model to a shared model for sexual partners.