1
|
Sanchez R, Tomei AC, Mamassian P, Vidal M, Desantis A. What the eyes, confidence, and partner's identity can tell about change of mind. Neurosci Conscious 2024; 2024:niae018. [PMID: 38720814 PMCID: PMC11077902 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niae018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Perceptual confidence reflects the ability to evaluate the evidence that supports perceptual decisions. It is thought to play a critical role in guiding decision-making. However, only a few empirical studies have actually investigated the function of perceptual confidence. To address this issue, we designed a perceptual task in which participants provided a confidence judgment on the accuracy of their perceptual decision. Then, they viewed the response of a machine or human partner, and they were instructed to decide whether to keep or change their initial response. We observed that confidence predicted participants' changes of mind more than task difficulty and perceptual accuracy. Additionally, interacting with a machine, compared to a human, decreased confidence and increased participants tendency to change their initial decision, suggesting that both confidence and changes of mind are influenced by contextual factors, such as the identity of a partner. Finally, variations in confidence judgments but not change of mind were correlated with pre-response pupil dynamics, indicating that arousal changes are linked to confidence computations. This study contributes to our understanding of the factors influencing confidence and changes of mind and also evaluates the possibility of using pupil dynamics as a proxy of confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rémi Sanchez
- Département Traitement de l’Information et Systèmes, ONERA, Salon-de-Provence F-13661, France
- Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (UMR 7289), CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille F-13005, France
| | - Anne-Catherine Tomei
- Département Traitement de l’Information et Systèmes, ONERA, Salon-de-Provence F-13661, France
- Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (UMR 7289), CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille F-13005, France
| | - Pascal Mamassian
- Laboratoire des systèmes perceptifs, Département d’études cognitives, École normale supérieure, PSL University, CNRS, Paris F-75005, France
| | - Manuel Vidal
- Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (UMR 7289), CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille F-13005, France
| | - Andrea Desantis
- Département Traitement de l’Information et Systèmes, ONERA, Salon-de-Provence F-13661, France
- Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (UMR 7289), CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille F-13005, France
- Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center (UMR 8002), CNRS and Université Paris Cité, Paris F-75006, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sharp PB, Fradkin I, Eldar E. Hierarchical inference as a source of human biases. COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE 2023; 23:476-490. [PMID: 35725986 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-022-01020-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The finding that human decision-making is systematically biased continues to have an immense impact on both research and policymaking. Prevailing views ascribe biases to limited computational resources, which require humans to resort to less costly resource-rational heuristics. Here, we propose that many biases in fact arise due to a computationally costly way of coping with uncertainty-namely, hierarchical inference-which by nature incorporates information that can seem irrelevant. We show how, in uncertain situations, Bayesian inference may avail of the environment's hierarchical structure to reduce uncertainty at the cost of introducing bias. We illustrate how this account can explain a range of familiar biases, focusing in detail on the halo effect and on the neglect of base rates. In each case, we show how a hierarchical-inference account takes the characterization of a bias beyond phenomenological description by revealing the computations and assumptions it might reflect. Furthermore, we highlight new predictions entailed by our account concerning factors that could mitigate or exacerbate bias, some of which have already garnered empirical support. We conclude that a hierarchical inference account may inform scientists and policy makers with a richer understanding of the adaptive and maladaptive aspects of human decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Sharp
- Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190501, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190501, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Isaac Fradkin
- Max Planck University College London Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, WC1B 5EH, UK
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Eran Eldar
- Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190501, Jerusalem, Israel.
- Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190501, Jerusalem, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mood and implicit confidence independently fluctuate at different time scales. COGNITIVE, AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE 2023; 23:142-161. [PMID: 36289181 DOI: 10.3758/s13415-022-01038-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
Mood is an important ingredient of decision-making. Human beings are immersed into a sea of emotions where episodes of high mood alternate with episodes of low mood. While changes in mood are well characterized, little is known about how these fluctuations interact with metacognition, and in particular with confidence about our decisions. We evaluated how implicit measurements of confidence are related with mood states of human participants through two online longitudinal experiments involving mood self-reports and visual discrimination decision-making tasks. Implicit confidence was assessed on each session by monitoring the proportion of opt-out trials when an opt-out option was available, as well as the median reaction time on standard correct trials as a secondary proxy of confidence. We first report a strong coupling between mood, stress, food enjoyment, and quality of sleep reported by participants in the same session. Second, we confirmed that the proportion of opt-out responses as well as reaction times in non-opt-out trials provided reliable indices of confidence in each session. We introduce a normative measure of overconfidence based on the pattern of opt-out selection and the signal-detection-theory framework. Finally and crucially, we found that mood, sleep quality, food enjoyment, and stress level are not consistently coupled with these implicit confidence markers, but rather they fluctuate at different time scales: mood-related states display faster fluctuations (over one day or half-a-day) than confidence level (two-and-a-half days). Therefore, our findings suggest that spontaneous fluctuations of mood and confidence in decision making are independent in the healthy adult population.
Collapse
|
4
|
Barbosa J, Stein H, Zorowitz S, Niv Y, Summerfield C, Soto-Faraco S, Hyafil A. A practical guide for studying human behavior in the lab. Behav Res Methods 2023; 55:58-76. [PMID: 35262897 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01793-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
In the last few decades, the field of neuroscience has witnessed major technological advances that have allowed researchers to measure and control neural activity with great detail. Yet, behavioral experiments in humans remain an essential approach to investigate the mysteries of the mind. Their relatively modest technological and economic requisites make behavioral research an attractive and accessible experimental avenue for neuroscientists with very diverse backgrounds. However, like any experimental enterprise, it has its own inherent challenges that may pose practical hurdles, especially to less experienced behavioral researchers. Here, we aim at providing a practical guide for a steady walk through the workflow of a typical behavioral experiment with human subjects. This primer concerns the design of an experimental protocol, research ethics, and subject care, as well as best practices for data collection, analysis, and sharing. The goal is to provide clear instructions for both beginners and experienced researchers from diverse backgrounds in planning behavioral experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao Barbosa
- Brain Circuits & Behavior lab, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, INSERM U960, Ecole Normale Supérieure - PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France.
| | - Heike Stein
- Brain Circuits & Behavior lab, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Computationnelles, INSERM U960, Ecole Normale Supérieure - PSL Research University, 75005, Paris, France
| | - Sam Zorowitz
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | - Yael Niv
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
- Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, USA
| | | | - Salvador Soto-Faraco
- Multisensory Research Group, Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain, and Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Caroti D, Adam‐Troian J, Arciszewski T. Reducing Teachers’ Unfounded Beliefs Through Critical‐Thinking Education: A Non‐Randomized Controlled Trial. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/acp.3969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Caroti
- Aix Marseille Univ. Marseille France
- CORTECS team Marseille France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zheng J, Hu L, Li L, Shen Q, Wang L. Confidence Modulates the Conformity Behavior of the Investors and Neural Responses of Social Influence in Crowdfunding. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:766908. [PMID: 34803641 PMCID: PMC8600065 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.766908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The decision about whether to invest can be affected by the choices or opinions of others known as a form of social influence. People make decisions with fluctuating confidence, which plays an important role in the decision process. However, it remains a fair amount of confusion regarding the effect of confidence on the social influence as well as the underlying neural mechanism. The current study applied a willingness-to-invest task with the event-related potentials method to examine the behavioral and neural manifestations of social influence and its interaction with confidence in the context of crowdfunding investment. The behavioral results demonstrate that the conformity tendency of the people increased when their willingness-to-invest deviated far from the group. Besides, when the people felt less confident about their initial judgment, they were more likely to follow the herd. In conjunction with the behavioral findings, the neural results of the social information processing indicate different susceptibilities to small and big conflicts between the own willingness of the people and the group, with small conflict evoked less negative feedback-related negativity (FRN) and more positive late positive potential (LPP). Moreover, confidence only modulated the later neural processing by eliciting larger LPP in the low confidence, implying more reliance on social information. These results corroborate previous findings regarding the conformity effect and its neural mechanism in investment decision and meanwhile extend the existing works of literature through providing behavioral and neural evidence to the effect of confidence on the social influence in the crowdfunding marketplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiehui Zheng
- School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Neuromanagement Laboratory, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Linfeng Hu
- School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lu Li
- School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Neuromanagement Laboratory, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qiang Shen
- School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lei Wang
- School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.,Neuromanagement Laboratory, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee JL, Ma WJ. Point-estimating observer models for latent cause detection. PLoS Comput Biol 2021; 17:e1009159. [PMID: 34714835 PMCID: PMC8580258 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The spatial distribution of visual items allows us to infer the presence of latent causes in the world. For instance, a spatial cluster of ants allows us to infer the presence of a common food source. However, optimal inference requires the integration of a computationally intractable number of world states in real world situations. For example, optimal inference about whether a common cause exists based on N spatially distributed visual items requires marginalizing over both the location of the latent cause and 2N possible affiliation patterns (where each item may be affiliated or non-affiliated with the latent cause). How might the brain approximate this inference? We show that subject behaviour deviates qualitatively from Bayes-optimal, in particular showing an unexpected positive effect of N (the number of visual items) on the false-alarm rate. We propose several “point-estimating” observer models that fit subject behaviour better than the Bayesian model. They each avoid a costly computational marginalization over at least one of the variables of the generative model by “committing” to a point estimate of at least one of the two generative model variables. These findings suggest that the brain may implement partially committal variants of Bayesian models when detecting latent causes based on complex real world data. Perceptual systems are designed to make sense of fragmented sensory data by inferring common, latent causes. Seeing a cluster of insects might allow us to infer the presence of a common food source, whereas the same number of insects scattered over a larger area of land might not evoke the same suspicions. The ability to reliably make this inference based on statistical information about the environment is surprisingly non-trivial: making the best possible inference requires making full use of the probabilistic information provided by the sensory data, which would require considering a combinatorially explosive number of hypothetical world states. In this paper, we test human subjects on their ability to perform a causal detection task: subjects are asked to judge whether an underlying cause of clustering is present or absent, based on the spatial distribution of those items. We show that subjects do not reason optimally on this task, and that particular computational short cuts (“committing” to certain world states over others, rather than representing them all) might underlie perceptual decision-making in these causal detection schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Laura Lee
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York City, New York, United States of Amercia
- * E-mail: (JLL); (WJM)
| | - Wei Ji Ma
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York City, New York, United States of Amercia
- * E-mail: (JLL); (WJM)
| |
Collapse
|