Decreasing incidence of registered hydatidiform moles in Denmark 1999-2014

Epidemiology of Gestational Trophoblastic Disease

Worldwide incidence rates of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) are difficult to estimate and compare due to large methodological differences within and between countries. Asia has generally reported higher incidence rates than Europe and North America, but modern reports have demonstrated a temporal decrease of GTD incidence rates in Asia and an increase in some European countries and North America. The main risk factors for hydatidiform mole are maternal age and previous molar events. Future studies on the epidemiology of GTD should include gestational trophoblastic neoplasia and international collaborative studies on this rare disease should be encouraged.

Appraisal of hydatidiform mole incidence and registration rates in Ireland following the establishment of a National Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Registry

AIMS

This study aimed to re-evaluate the incidence of hydatidiform mole (HM) and determine gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) registration rates in Ireland following the establishment of the National GTD Registry in 2017.

METHODS

We performed a 3-year retrospective audit of HM cases (January 2017 to December 2019) reported in our centre. In 2019, we surveyed Irish pathology laboratories to determine the number of HMs diagnosed nationally and compared this data to that recorded in the National GTD Registry. Additionally, we compared both local and national HM incidence rates to those reported internationally.

RESULTS

In the 3-year local audit, we identified 87 HMs among 1856 products of conception (POCs) providing a local HM incidence rate of 3.92 per 1000 births. The 1-year pathology survey recorded 170 HMs in 6008 POCs, yielding a national incidence rate of 2.86 per 1000 births. Importantly, the local HM incidence rate exceeded the national incidence rate by 37% and the local partial HM incidence (1 in 296 births) was 64% higher than the nationally incidence rate (1 in 484 births). Notably, 42% of the HM and atypical POCs diagnosed nationally were not reported to the National GTD Registry.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals increased HM incidence rates both locally and nationally compared with previous Irish studies. The higher local PHM incidence may reflect more limited access to ploidy analysis in other pathology laboratories nationally. Significantly, almost half of the women with diagnosed or suspected HM were not registered with the National GTD Centre.

Diagnosis of hydatidiform moles using circulating gestational trophoblasts isolated from maternal blood

INTRODUCTION

Identifying hydatidiform moles (HMs) is crucial due to the risk of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. When a HM is suspected on clinical findings, surgical termination is recommended. However, in a substantial fraction of the cases, the conceptus is actually a non-molar miscarriage. If distinction between molar and non-molar gestations could be obtained before termination, surgical intervention could be minimized.

METHODS

Circulating gestational trophoblasts (cGTs) were isolated from blood from 15 consecutive women suspected of molar pregnancies in gestational week 6-13. The trophoblasts were individually sorted using fluorescence activated cell sorting. STR analysis targeting 24 loci was performed on DNA isolated from maternal and paternal leukocytes, chorionic villi, cGTs, and cfDNA.

RESULTS

With a gestational age above 10 weeks, cGTs were isolated in 87% of the cases. Two androgenetic HMs, three triploid diandric HMs, and six conceptuses with diploid biparental genome were diagnosed using cGTs. The STR profiles in cGTs were identical to the profiles in DNA from chorionic villi. Eight of the 15 women suspected to have a HM prior to termination had a conceptus with a diploid biparental genome, and thus most likely a non-molar miscarriage.

DISCUSSION

Genetic analysis of cGTs is superior to identify HMs, compared to analysis of cfDNA, as it is not hampered by the presence of maternal DNA. cGTs provide information about the full genome in single cells, facilitating estimation of ploidy. This may be a step towards differentiating HMs from non-HMs before termination.

Ruptured ectopic molar pregnancy and ruptured uterine fibroid: a challenging rare diagnosis

Although rare and unusual occurrences, a ruptured ectopic molar pregnancy (MP) and a ruptured uterine fibroid can lead to significant maternal morbidity and mortality. We present a unique case of these complications developing concurrently-resulting in the haemodynamic compromise of an otherwise healthy young female patient. The patient underwent a diagnostic laparoscopy which converted into a laparotomy, salpingectomy and myomectomy. Comprehensive histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of a ruptured ectopic complete MP and ruptured uterine fibroid. The patient recovered quickly within days. Prompt definitive management, conclusive histopathology and adequate follow-up were the hallmarks of this singular case. These key factors lead to the rare diagnosis of ruptured ectopic MP and uterine fibroid, prevention of adverse outcomes and provision of comprehensive patient care.

Challenges in diagnosing hydatidiform moles: a review of promising molecular biomarkers

INTRODUCTION

Hydatidiform moles (HMs) are pathologic conceptions with unique genetic bases and abnormal placental villous tissue. Overlapping ultrasonographical and histological manifestations of molar and non-molar (NM) gestations and HMs subtypes makes accurate diagnosis challenging. Currently, immunohistochemical analysis of p57 and molecular genotyping have greatly improved the diagnostic accuracy.

AREAS COVERED

The differential expression of molecular biomarkers may be valuable for distinguishing among the subtypes of HMs and their mimics. Thus, biomarkers may be the key to refining HMs diagnosis. In this review, we summarize the current challenges in diagnosing HMs, and provide a critical overview of the recent literature about potential diagnostic biomarkers and their subclassifications. An online search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted from the inception to 1 April 2022.

EXPERT OPINION

the emerging biomarkers offer new possibilities to refine the diagnosis for HMs and pregnancy loss. Although the additional studies are required to be quantified and investigated in clinical trials to verify their diagnostic utility. It is important to explore, validate, and facilitate the wide adoption of newly developed biomarkers in the coming years.