Sinonasal quality of life in patients after an endoscopic endonasal surgery of a sellar tumour

Exploring the influence of nasal morbidity on quality of life following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 95 patients

The endoscopic endonasal approach is more disruptive to normal anatomy (particularly nasal mucosa) than the transseptal submucosal microscopic approach. This may result in greater postoperative nasal morbidity, in turn reducing quality of life. We aimed to assess the severity and time course of nasal morbidity, and its impact on quality of life, following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in this retrospective cohort study. We identified 95 patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery for anterior skull base pathologies. Nasal-specific questions from the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and the Anterior Skull Base inventory (ASB-12) were combined with quality-of-life questions. Patient demographics, diagnosis, and operative data were collected from electronic records. Age of the cohort ranged from 14-83 years. Time elapsed since surgery ranged from 3-85 months. 85/95 (89%) felt that nasal morbidity associated with surgery was acceptable, given the underlying reason for, and outcome of surgery; 10/95 (11%) did not. 71/95 (75%) reported no change or improvement in olfaction 3-months following surgery. 24/95 (25%) reported a deterioration in olfaction which was mild in 7%, moderate in 7%, and severe in 11%. Nasal crusting, nasal obstruction, and headache were moderately problematic symptoms but improved significantly by 3-month follow-up. Nasal discharge, nasal pain, and nasal whistling were mildly problematic and improved significantly by 3-months. 62/95 (65%) patients reported 'no change' in day-to-day activities due to the effects on their nose after surgery. 19/95 (20%) had 'mild inconvenience', 8/95 (8%) 'moderate inconvenience' and 6/95 (6%) 'severe inconvenience'. Endoscopic anterior skull base surgery is associated with nasal morbidity. Whilst 35% of patients appreciate a consequent negative impact on day-to-day life, the overwhelming majority feel that nasal morbidity is acceptable, given the wider surgical goals.

Is nasal airflow disrupted after endoscopic skull base surgery? A short review

Even the most delicate endonasal surgery for skull base lesion causes changes in the nasal cavity, some of them permanent. Morphological changes in the nasal cavity and their consequences (changes in nasal airflow) are often studied by advanced numerical analysis called computational fluid dynamics. This review summarizes current knowledge of endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base surgery effects on nasal airflow. Several studies have shown that endoscopic skull base surgery changes nasal anatomy to the extent that nasal airflow changes significantly postoperatively. Removing any intranasal structure increases the cross-sectional area of the respective nasal meatus, leading to increased nasal airflow in this area while airflow in the narrower periphery decreases. Middle turbinate resection increases airflow in the middle meatus and reduces airflow in the superior and inferior meatus. Small posterior septectomy does not cause a significant change in nasal airflow. Nasal septum deviation is an important factor in airflow changes. Current studies describe nasal changes after rather extensive procedures (e.g., middle turbinectomy, ethmoidectomy) that are unnecessary in routine pituitary adenoma surgery. No studies have compared changes using pre- and postoperative scans of the same patients after actual surgery.