Immune cell populations differ in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty for arthrofibrosis

Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review

» Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the new formation of excessive scar tissue that results in limited ROM, pain, and functional deficits.» The diagnosis of arthrofibrosis is based on the patient's history, clinical examination, absence of alternative diagnoses from diagnostic testing, and operative findings. Imaging is helpful in ruling out specific causes of stiffness after TKA. A biopsy is not indicated, and no biomarkers of arthrofibrosis exist.» Arthrofibrosis pathophysiology is multifactorial and related to aberrant activation and proliferation of myofibroblasts that primarily deposit type I collagen in response to a proinflammatory environment. Transforming growth factor-beta signaling is the best established pathway involved in arthrofibrosis after TKA.» Management includes both nonoperative and operative modalities. Physical therapy is most used while revision arthroplasty is typically reserved as a last resort. Additional investigation into specific pathophysiologic mechanisms can better inform targeted therapeutics.

Single-cell and bulk tissue sequencing unravels the heterogeneity of synovial microenvironment in arthrofibrosis

Arthrofibrosis (AF) is a debilitating complication that occurs after trauma or surgery, leading to functional impairment and surgical failures worldwide. This study aimed to uncover the underlying mechanism of AF. A total of 141 patients were enrolled, and synovial samples were collected from both patients and animal models at different time points. Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk tissue RNA sequencing (bulk-seq) were employed to profile the distinct synovial microenvironment. This study revealed changes in cell proportions during AF pathogenesis and identified Engrailed-1 (EN1) as a key transcription factor strongly associated with disease severity and clinical prognosis. Additionally, the researchers discovered a specific type of synovial fibroblast called DKK3-SLF, which played a critical role in driving AF development. These findings shed light on the composition and heterogeneity of the synovial microenvironment in AF, offering potential avenues for identifying therapeutic targets and developing clinical treatments for AF and other fibrotic diseases.

Activated mast cells in periprosthetic joint infection-associated tissue

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty surgery. Increased densities of activated mast cells have been predicted to be present in PJI compared to non-infectious arthroplasty failure based on analysis of transcriptomic data, but their presence in PJI-associated periprosthetic tissues has not been visually confirmed.

Objective

This preliminary study investigated the presence and activation status of mast cells in periprosthetic tissues associated with PJI.

Methods

Periprosthetic tissues from five PJI cases and three arthroplasty failures due to instability and one due to stiffness were immunohistochemically stained using tryptase and microscopically evaluated to enumerate mast cells and evaluate overall activation status within tissue samples. Mast cell activation was evidenced by the release of tryptase into the extracellular space surrounding mast cells.

Results

Mast cells were found in all samples, with average cellular densities of 22 and 26 cells/mm2 tissue in PJI and uninfected samples, respectively (p, 0.6610). Apparent mast cell activation and degranulation was readily observed throughout each of the five PJI samples studied, but not in any of the uninfected samples studied.

Conclusion

While preliminary, these findings provide evidence for a role of mast cells in the immune response in PJI. Additional investigation of the role of mast cells during arthroplasty failure is warranted, providing a better understanding of underlying biology and informing potential diagnostic and treatment targets.

Profiling the Immune Response to Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Non-Infectious Arthroplasty Failure

Arthroplasty failure is a major complication of joint replacement surgery. It can be caused by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or non-infectious etiologies, and often requires surgical intervention and (in select scenarios) resection and reimplantation of implanted devices. Fast and accurate diagnosis of PJI and non-infectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF) is critical to direct medical and surgical treatment; differentiation of PJI from NIAF may, however, be unclear in some cases. Traditional culture, nucleic acid amplification tests, metagenomic, and metatranscriptomic techniques for microbial detection have had success in differentiating the two entities, although microbiologically negative apparent PJI remains a challenge. Single host biomarkers or, alternatively, more advanced immune response profiling-based approaches may be applied to differentiate PJI from NIAF, overcoming limitations of microbial-based detection methods and possibly, especially with newer approaches, augmenting them. In this review, current approaches to arthroplasty failure diagnosis are briefly overviewed, followed by a review of host-based approaches for differentiation of PJI from NIAF, including exciting futuristic combinational multi-omics methodologies that may both detect pathogens and assess biological responses, illuminating causes of arthroplasty failure.