Prevalence and factors associated with hepatitis C among pregnant women in China: a cross-sectional study

ICP - could there be a virus in the works?

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is the most common liver-specific disorder affecting pregnant women, with an Australian incidence of 0.6% pa and recurring in 70% of those affected. ICP causes mild to severe pruritus, often resulting in considerable skin excoriations, profound sleep disturbances, and severe anxiety, and yet the aetiology and optimal treatment or management of this condition remains unknown. In this review, we consider the role of viruses in causing or exacerbating ICP and discuss viruses that have been most closely implicated in the disease, including the role of Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C viruses in ICP.

HCV Antiviral Drugs Have the Potential to Adversely Perturb the Fetal-Maternal Communication Axis through Inhibition of CYP3A7 DHEA-S Oxidation

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) poses a great risk to pregnant people and their developing fetus, yet no HCV antiviral treatment guidelines have been established. While there has been a substantial increase in the development of HCV antivirals, the effect they have on the developing fetus remains poorly defined. Many of these drugs are metabolized through the cytochrome P450 CYP3A pathway, which is mediated by cytochrome P450 3A7 (CYP3A7) in the fetus and developing infant. In this study, we sought to investigate the effect HCV antivirals have on CYP3A7 metabolism, as this CYP enzyme plays a vital role in proper fetal and neonatal development. Of the 13 HCV antivirals we investigated, 8 (∼62%) inhibited CYP3A7 metabolic activity by 50% or more at a concentration of 20 µM. Furthermore, paritaprevir, asunaprevir, simeprevir, danoprevir, and glecaprevir all had observed half-maximal inhibitory concentrations between the range of 10 and 20 µM, which is physiologically relevant in comparison with the Km of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEA-S) oxidation (reported to be between 5 and 20 µM). We also discovered that paritaprevir is a time-dependent inhibitor of CYP3A7, which shifts the IC50 ∼twofold from 11 µM to 5 µM. Upon further characterization, paritaprevir inactivates DHEA-S metabolism by CYP3A7, with KI and Kinact values of 4.66 µM and 0.00954 minute-1, respectively. Depending on treatment plan and off-label drug use, HCV treatment could adversely affect the fetal-maternal communication axis by blocking fetal CYP3A7 metabolism of important endogenous hormones. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The prevalence of HCV in pregnant people is estimated at between 1% and 8% of the global population, yet little to no information exists about the risk antiviral treatment poses to the developing fetus. There is a potential risk of drugs adversely affecting mother-fetal communication by inhibiting fetal hepatic CYP3A7, an integral enzyme for estriol production. We discovered that five HCV antivirals inhibited DHEA-S metabolism by CYP3A7, and paritaprevir inactivated the enzyme. Our studies demonstrate the potential threat these drugs pose to proper fetal development.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with hepatitis C and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: The sum of the parts

OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C virus and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) are well-known independent risk factors for adverse outcomes in pregnancy. In addition, it is well-established that there is an association between Hepatitis C and ICP. This study's objective was to describe the impact of having both Hepatitis C and ICP on maternal and obstetric outcomes compared to patients having either Hepatitis C or ICP.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the Nationwide Readmissions Database, an all-payor sample of discharges from approximately 60% of US hospitalizations. Deliveries at 24-42+ weeks between 10/2015 and 12/2020 were included. Diagnosis of Hepatitis C and ICP, and outcomes related to severe maternal morbidity were identified using International Classification of Disease-10 codes. Patients were categorized based on Hepatitis C and ICP status. Weighted logistic and negative binomial regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between Hepatitis C and ICP status and outcomes, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. The primary outcome was any severe maternal morbidity; secondary outcomes included acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, sepsis, gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and hospital length of stay. We modeled interaction terms between ICP and Hepatitis C to assess whether there was a greater or lesser effect from having both conditions on outcomes than we would expect from additive combination of the individual components (i.e., synergy or antagonism).

RESULTS

A total of 10,040,850 deliveries between 24-42+ weeks were identified. Of these, 45,368 had Hepatitis C only; 84,582 had ICP only; and 1,967 had both Hepatitis C and ICP. Patients with both Hepatitis C and ICP had 1.5-fold higher odds of developing severe maternal morbidity compared to having neither. There was an also an increased odds of severe maternal morbidity in patients with both Hepatitis C and ICP compared to patients with only Hepatitis C or ICP. Having both was also associated with higher odds of preterm birth and length of stay compared to having only Hepatitis C, only ICP, or neither (preterm birth: aOR 5.09, 95% CI 4.87-5.33 vs. neither; length of stay: 46% mean increase, 95% CI 35-58% vs. neither). Associations were additive-no significant interactions between hepatitis C and cholestasis were found on rates of severe maternal morbidity, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, sepsis, cesarean section, or preterm birth (all p>0.05), and was minimal for gestational diabetes and length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis C and ICP are independent, additive risk factors for adverse maternal and obstetric outcomes. Despite physiologic plausibility, no evidence of a synergistic effect of these two diagnoses on outcomes was noted. These data may be useful in counseling patients regarding their increased risk of adverse outcomes when ICP presents in association with Hepatitis C versus ICP alone.

Prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among pregnant women in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate prevalence of HIV infection in Nigeria and to examine variations by geopolitical zones and study characteristics to inform policy, practice and research.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of bibliographic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Global Health, Academic Search Elite and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and grey sources for studies published between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2019. Studies reporting prevalence estimates of HIV among pregnant women in Nigeria using a diagnostic test were included. Primary outcome was proportion (%) of pregnant women living with HIV infection. A review protocol was developed and registered (PROSPERO 2019 CRD42019107037).

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies involving 72 728 pregnant women were included. Ten studies were of high quality and the remaining were of moderate quality. Twenty-one studies used two or more diagnostic tests to identify women living with HIV. Overall pooled prevalence of HIV among pregnant women was 7.22% (95% CI 5.64 to 9.21). Studies showed high degree of heterogeneity (I² =97.2%) and evidence of publication bias (p=0.728). Pooled prevalence for most individual geopolitical zones showed substantial variations compared with overall prevalence. North-Central (6.84%, 95% CI 4.73 to 9.79) and South-West zones (6.27%, 95% CI 4.75 to 8.24) had lower prevalence whereas South-East zone (17.04%, 95% CI 9.01 to 29.86) had higher prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

While robust national prevalence studies are sparse in Nigeria, our findings suggest 7 in every 100 pregnant women are likely to have HIV infection. These figures are consistent with reported prevalence rates in sub-Saharan African region. WHO has indicated much higher prevalence in Nigeria compared with our findings. This discrepancy could potentially be attributed to varied methodological approaches and regional focus of studies included in our review. The magnitude of the issue highlights the need for targeted efforts from local, national and international stakeholders for prevention, diagnosis, management and treatment.