Recommendations for the use of pediatric data in artificial intelligence and machine learning ACCEPT-AI

Artificial Intelligence Tools in Pediatric Urology: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances

Artificial intelligence (AI) is providing novel answers to long-standing clinical problems, and it is quickly changing pediatric urology. This thorough analysis focuses on current developments in AI technologies that improve pediatric urology diagnosis, treatment planning, and surgery results. Deep learning algorithms help detect problems with previously unheard-of precision in disorders including hydronephrosis, pyeloplasty, and vesicoureteral reflux, where AI-powered prediction models have demonstrated promising outcomes in boosting diagnostic accuracy. AI-enhanced image processing methods have significantly improved the quality and interpretation of medical images. Examples of these methods are deep-learning-based segmentation and contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE). These methods guarantee higher precision in the identification and classification of pediatric urological disorders, and AI-driven ground truth construction approaches aid in the standardization of and improvement in training data, resulting in more resilient and consistent segmentation models. AI is being used for surgical support as well. AI-assisted navigation devices help with difficult operations like pyeloplasty by decreasing complications and increasing surgical accuracy. AI also helps with long-term patient monitoring, predictive analytics, and customized treatment strategies, all of which improve results for younger patients. However, there are practical, ethical, and legal issues with AI integration in pediatric urology that need to be carefully navigated. To close knowledge gaps, more investigation is required, especially in the areas of AI-driven surgical methods and standardized ground truth datasets for pediatric radiologic image segmentation. In the end, AI has the potential to completely transform pediatric urology by enhancing patient care, increasing the effectiveness of treatments, and spurring more advancements in this exciting area.

From bytes to bedside: a systematic review on the use and readiness of artificial intelligence in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit

PURPOSE

Despite its promise to enhance patient outcomes and support clinical decision making, clinical use of artificial intelligence (AI) models at the bedside remains limited. Translation of advancements in AI research into tangible clinical benefits is necessary to improve neonatal and pediatric care for critically ill patients. This systematic review seeks to assess the maturity of AI models in neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit (NICU and PICU) treatment, and their risk of bias and objectives.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search in Medline ALL, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. Studies using AI models during NICU or PICU stay were eligible for inclusion. Study design, objective, dataset size, level of validation, risk of bias, and technological readiness of the models were extracted.

RESULTS

Out of the 1257 identified studies 262 were included. The majority of studies was conducted in the NICU (66%) and most had a high risk of bias (77%). An insufficient sample size was the main cause for this high risk of bias. No studies were identified that integrated an AI model in routine clinical practice and the majority of the studies remained in the prototyping and model development phase.

CONCLUSION

The majority of AI models remain within the testing and prototyping phase and have a high risk of bias. Bridging the gap between designing and clinical implementation of AI models is needed to warrant safe and trustworthy AI models. Specific guidelines and approaches can help improve clinical outcome with usage of AI.

Large Language Models in Pediatric Education: Current Uses and Future Potential

Generative artificial intelligence, especially large language models (LLMs), has the potential to affect every level of pediatric education and training. Demonstrating speed and adaptability, LLMs can aid educators, trainees, and practicing pediatricians with tasks such as enhancing curriculum design through the creation of cases, videos, and assessments; creating individualized study plans and providing real-time feedback for trainees; and supporting pediatricians by enhancing information searches, clinic efficiency, and bedside teaching. LLMs can refine patient education materials to address patients' specific needs. The current versions of LLMs sometimes provide "hallucinations" or incorrect information but are likely to improve. There are ethical concerns related to bias in the output of LLMs, the potential for plagiarism, and the possibility of the overuse of an online tool at the expense of in-person learning. The potential benefits of LLMs in pediatric education can outweigh the potential risks if employed judiciously by content experts who conscientiously review the output. All stakeholders must firmly establish rules and policies to provide rigorous guidance and assure the safe and proper use of this transformative tool in the care of the child. In this article, we outline the history, current uses, and challenges with generative artificial intelligence in pediatrics education. We provide examples of LLM output, including performance on a pediatrics examination guide and the creation of patient care instructions. Future directions to establish a safe and appropriate path for the use of LLMs will be discussed.

Applied artificial intelligence for global child health: Addressing biases and barriers

Given the potential benefits of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) within healthcare, it is critical to consider how these technologies can be deployed in pediatric research and practice. Currently, healthcare AI/ML has not yet adapted to the specific technical considerations related to pediatric data nor adequately addressed the specific vulnerabilities of children and young people (CYP) in relation to AI. While the greatest burden of disease in CYP is firmly concentrated in lower and middle-income countries (LMICs), existing applied pediatric AI/ML efforts are concentrated in a small number of high-income countries (HICs). In LMICs, use-cases remain primarily in the proof-of-concept stage. This narrative review identifies a number of intersecting challenges that pose barriers to effective AI/ML for CYP globally and explores the shifts needed to make progress across multiple domains. Child-specific technical considerations throughout the AI/ML lifecycle have been largely overlooked thus far, yet these can be critical to model effectiveness. Governance concerns are paramount, with suitable national and international frameworks and guidance required to enable the safe and responsible deployment of advanced technologies impacting the care of CYP and using their data. An ambitious vision for child health demands that the potential benefits of AI/Ml are realized universally through greater international collaboration, capacity building, strong oversight, and ultimately diffusing the AI/ML locus of power to empower researchers and clinicians globally. In order that AI/ML systems that do not exacerbate inequalities in pediatric care, teams researching and developing these technologies in LMICs must ensure that AI/ML research is inclusive of the needs and concerns of CYP and their caregivers. A broad, interdisciplinary, and human-centered approach to AI/ML is essential for developing tools for healthcare workers delivering care, such that the creation and deployment of ML is grounded in local systems, cultures, and clinical practice. Decisions to invest in developing and testing pediatric AI/ML in resource-constrained settings must always be part of a broader evaluation of the overall needs of a healthcare system, considering the critical building blocks underpinning effective, sustainable, and cost-efficient healthcare delivery for CYP.

Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Education: Perspectives from Pediatric Medical Educators and Residents

OBJECTIVES

The use of technology has rapidly increased in the past century. Artificial intelligence (AI) and information technology (IT) are now applied in healthcare and medical education. The purpose of this study was to assess the readiness of Indonesian teaching staff and pediatric residents for AI integration into the curriculum.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was distributed among teaching staff and pediatric residents from 15 national universities. The questionnaire consisted of two sections: demographic information and questions regarding the use of IT and AI in child health education. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and highly agree.

RESULTS

A total of 728 pediatric residents and 196 teaching staff from 15 national universities participated in the survey. Over half of the respondents were familiar with the terms IT and AI. The majority agreed that IT and AI have simplified the process of learning theories and skills. All participants were in favor of sharing data to facilitate the development of AI and expressed readiness to incorporate IT and AI into their teaching tools.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of our study indicate that pediatric residents and teaching staff are ready to implement AI in medical education.

Application of STREAM-URO and APPRAISE-AI reporting standards for artificial intelligence studies in pediatric urology: A case example with pediatric hydronephrosis

INTRODUCTION

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in pediatric urology is gaining increased popularity and credibility. However, the literature lacks standardization in reporting and there are areas for methodological improvement, which incurs difficulty in comparison between studies and may ultimately hurt clinical implementation of these models. The "STandardized REporting of Applications of Machine learning in UROlogy" (STREAM-URO) framework provides methodological instructions to improve transparent reporting in urology and APPRAISE-AI in a critical appraisal tool which provides quantitative measures for the quality of AI studies. The adoption of these will allow urologists and developers to ensure consistency in reporting, improve comparison, develop better models, and hopefully inspire clinical translation.

METHODS

In this article, we have applied STREAM-URO framework and APPRAISE-AI tool to the pediatric hydronephrosis literature. By doing this, we aim to describe best practices on ML reporting in urology with STREAM-URO and provide readers with a critical appraisal tool for ML quality with APPRAISE-AI. By applying these to the pediatric hydronephrosis literature, we provide some tutorial for other readers to employ these in developing and appraising ML models. We also present itemized recommendations for adequate reporting, and critically appraise the quality of ML in pediatric hydronephrosis insofar. We provide examples of strong reporting and highlight areas for improvement.

RESULTS

There were 8 ML models applied to pediatric hydronephrosis. The 26-item STREAM-URO framework is provided in Appendix A and 24-item APPRAISE-AI tool is provided in Appendix B. Across the 8 studies, the median compliance with STREAM-URO was 67 % and overall study quality was moderate. The highest scoring APPRAISE-AI domains in pediatric hydronephrosis were clinical relevance and reporting quality, while the worst were methodological conduct, robustness of results, and reproducibility.

CONCLUSIONS

If properly conducted and reported, ML has the potential to impact the care we provide to patients in pediatric urology. While AI is exciting, the paucity of strong evidence limits our ability to translate models to practice. The first step toward this goal is adequate reporting and ensuring high quality models, and STREAM-URO and APPRAISE-AI can facilitate better reporting and critical appraisal, respectively.

Artificial intelligence in paediatric endocrinology: conflict or cooperation

Artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is transforming healthcare by automating system tasks, assisting in diagnostics, predicting patient outcomes and personalising patient care, founded on the ability to analyse vast datasets. In paediatric endocrinology, AI has been developed for diabetes, for insulin dose adjustment, detection of hypoglycaemia and retinopathy screening; bone age assessment and thyroid nodule screening; the identification of growth disorders; the diagnosis of precocious puberty; and the use of facial recognition algorithms in conditions such as Cushing syndrome, acromegaly, congenital adrenal hyperplasia and Turner syndrome. AI can also predict those most at risk from childhood obesity by stratifying future interventions to modify lifestyle. AI will facilitate personalised healthcare by integrating data from 'omics' analysis, lifestyle tracking, medical history, laboratory and imaging, therapy response and treatment adherence from multiple sources. As data acquisition and processing becomes fundamental, data privacy and protecting children's health data is crucial. Minimising algorithmic bias generated by AI analysis for rare conditions seen in paediatric endocrinology is an important determinant of AI validity in clinical practice. AI cannot create the patient-doctor relationship or assess the wider holistic determinants of care. Children have individual needs and vulnerabilities and are considered in the context of family relationships and dynamics. Importantly, whilst AI provides value through augmenting efficiency and accuracy, it must not be used to replace clinical skills.

A Strategy for Artificial Intelligence With Clinical Impact-Eyes on the Prize

This Viewpoint describes a strategy for addressing major challenges in artificial intelligence in pediatrics to maximize clinical impact.

Best Practices for Research in Virtual and Augmented Reality in Dermatology

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) technologies have advanced rapidly in recent years. These cutting-edge technologies provide dermatology researchers, educators, proceduralists, and patients with opportunities in new scientific horizons. VR is a technology that facilitates immersive human experiences by allowing users to connect with various simulated environments through natural head and hand movements, whereas AR supplements a user's perception of their real environment with virtual elements. Despite technological advancements, there is limited literature on the methodological steps for conducting rigorous VR and AR research in dermatology. Effective storyboarding, user-driven design, and interdisciplinary teamwork play a central role in ensuring that VR/AR applications meet the specific needs of dermatology clinical and research teams. We present a step-by-step approach for their design, team composition, and evaluation in dermatology research, medical education, procedures, and habit formation strategies. We also discuss current VR and AR dermatology applications and the importance of ethical and safety considerations in deploying this new technology.

Artificial intelligence (AI) or augmented intelligence? How big data and AI are transforming healthcare: Challenges and opportunities

The sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship is deeply embedded in tradition - the Hippocratic oath, medical ethics, professional codes of conduct, and legislation - all of which are being disrupted by big data and 'artificial' intelligence (AI). The transition from paper-based records to electronic health records, wearables, mobile health applications and mobile phone data has created new opportunities to scale up data collection. Databases of unimaginable magnitude can be harnessed to develop algorithms for AI and to refine machine learning. Complex neural networks now lie at the core of ubiquitous AI systems in healthcare. A transformed healthcare environment enhanced by innovation, robotics, digital technology, and improved diagnostics and therapeutics is plagued by ethical, legal and social challenges. Global guidelines are emerging to ensure governance in AI, but many low- and middle-income countries have yet to develop context- specific frameworks. Legislation must be developed to frame liability and account for negligence due to robotics in the same way human healthcare providers are held accountable. The digital divide between high- and low-income settings is significant and has the potential to exacerbate health inequities globally.