Analogues of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and trans-4-aminocrotonic acid (TACA) substituted in the 2 position as GABAC receptor antagonists

Synthesis and Biological Activity of Homohypotaurine Obtained by the Enzyme-Based Conversion of Homocysteine Sulfinic Acid Using Recombinant Escherichia Coli Glutamate Decarboxylase

l-Homocysteine, formed from S-adenosyl methionine following demethylation and adenosine release, accumulates when the methionine recycling pathway and other pathways become impaired, thus leading to hyperhomocysteinemia, a biomarker in cardiovascular diseases, neurological/psychiatric disorders, and cancer. The partial oxidation of the l-homocysteine thiol group and its decarboxylation on C-alpha lead to the formation of l-homocysteinesulfinic acid (l-HCSA) and homohypotaurine (HHT), respectively. Both compounds are not readily available from commercial suppliers, which hinders the investigation of their biological activities. Herein, the chemical synthesis of l-HCSA, from l-homocystine, was the starting point for establishing the bio-based synthesis of HHT using recombinant Escherichia coli glutamate decarboxylase (EcGadB), an enzyme already successfully employed for the bio-based synthesis of GABA and its phosphinic analog. Prior to HHT synthesis, kcat (33.92 ± 1.07) and KM (38.24 ± 3.45 mM) kinetic constants were determined for l-HCSA on EcGadB. The results of our study show that the EcGadB-mediated synthesis of HHT can be achieved with good yields (i.e., 40% following enzymatic synthesis and column chromatography). Purified HHT was tested in vitro on primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells and rat cardiomyoblasts and compared to the fully oxidized analog, homotaurine (OT, also known as tramiprosate), in widespread pharmaceutical use. The results show that both cell lines display statistically significant recovery from the cytotoxic effects induced by H2O2 in the presence of HHT.

Negative modulation of the GABAAρ1 receptor function by histamine

Besides its function as a local mediator of the immune response, histamine can play a role as a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator. Histamine actions are classically mediated through four different G protein-coupled receptor subtypes but non-classical actions were also described, including effects on many ligand-gated ion channels. Previous evidence indicated that histamine acts as a positive modulator on diverse GABAA receptor subtypes, such as GABAAα1β2γ2, GABAAα2β3γ2, GABAAα3β3γ2, GABAAα4β3γ2 and GABAAα5β3γ2. Meanwhile, its effects on GABAAρ1 receptors, known to stand for tonic currents in retinal neurons, had not been examined before. The effects of histamine on the function of human homomeric GABAAρ1 receptors were studied here, using heterologous expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes followed by the electrophysiological recording of GABA-evoked Cl- currents. Histamine inhibited GABAAρ1 receptor-mediated responses. Effects were reversible, independent of the membrane potential, and strongly dependent on both histamine and GABA concentration. A rightward parallel shift in the concentration-response curve for GABA was observed in the presence of histamine, without substantial change in the maximal response or the Hill coefficient. Results were compatible with a competitive antagonism of histamine on the GABAAρ1 receptors. This is the first report of inhibitory actions exerted by histamine on an ionotropic GABA receptor.

Insights into the molecular mechanism of triazolopyrimidinone derivatives effects on the modulation of α1β2γ2 subtype of GABAA receptor: An in silico approach

Due to the importance of benzodiazepine drugs in clinical practice, such as the treatment of anxiety disorders, depression, and insomnia and the side effects of classical benzodiazepines, the study of new benzodiazepine agonists has received much attentions. In this work, we used in silico methods to explore the molecular mechanism of 1,2,4-triazolo [1,5--a] pyrimidinone derivatives in the modulation of α₁β₂γ₂ subtype of GABA_A receptor. To this aim, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation (MD), post-MD analysis, binding free energy calculation, and prediction of ADME properties were performed. Results showed that all new compounds have a better binding affinity for the Benzodiazepine (BZD) site of the receptor than diazepam and compound 4c had the highest affinity among them. Moreover, a good agreement was observed between the calculated ΔG_binding and experimental IC₅₀ values. Also, we noticed that residues in loop regions (particularly loop C and D-F in α₁ and γ₂ subunits, respectively) forming BZD binding site, take part in forming several H-bonds between the agonists and the receptor. Ser205, Thr207, Tyr160, and His102 of α₁ subunit and Thr207 of γ₂ subunit are mainly involved in forming H-bonds. Also, the orientation of agonists in the BZD binding site leads to π-π interactions with hydrophobic residues in loops A-F. Based on the DCCM analysis, the correlated motions in the γ₂ subunit residues are greater than those of α₁ subunit residues. Further, predicted ADME results indicated that all agonists meet the criteria. The triplicate MD simulation showed the reproducibility of the results and strengthened the study. Our results provide a comprehensive insight into the receptor-agonist interactions and clues for designing future BZD agonists.

Differentiating enantioselective actions of GABOB: a possible role for threonine 244 in the binding site of GABA(C) ρ(1) receptors

Designing potent and subtype-selective ligands with therapeutic value requires knowledge about how endogenous ligands interact with their binding site. 4-Amino-3-hydroxybutanoic acid (GABOB) is an endogenous ligand found in the central nervous system in mammals. It is a metabolic product of GABA, the major inhibitory neurotransmitter. Homology modeling of the GABA(C) ρ(1) receptor revealed a potential H-bond interaction between the hydroxyl group of GABOB and threonine 244 (T244) located on loop C of the ligand binding site of the ρ(1) subunit. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we examined the effect of mutating T244 on the efficacy and pharmacology of GABOB and various ligands. It was found that mutating T244 to amino acids that lacked a hydroxyl group in their side chains produced GABA insensitive receptors. Only by mutating ρ(1)T244 to serine (ρ(1)T244S) produced a GABA responsive receptor, albeit 39-fold less sensitive to GABA than ρ(1)wild-type. We also observed changes in the activities of the GABA(C) receptor partial agonists, muscimol and imidazole-4-acetic acid (I4AA). At the concentrations we tested, the partial agonists antagonized GABA-induced currents at ρ(1)T244S mutant receptors (Muscimol: ρ(1)wild-type, EC(50) = 1.4 μM; ρ(1)T244S, IC(50) = 32.8 μM. I4AA: ρ(1)wild-type, EC(50) = 8.6 μM; ρ(1)T244S, IC(50) = 21.4 μM). This indicates that T244 is predominantly involved in channel gating. R-(-)-GABOB and S-(+)-GABOB are full agonists at ρ(1)wild-type receptors. In contrast, R-(-)-GABOB was a weak partial agonist at ρ(1)T244S (1 mM activates 26% of the current produced by GABA EC(50) versus ρ(1)wild-type, EC(50) = 19 μM; I(max) 100%), and S-(+)-GABOB was a competitive antagonist at ρ(1)T244S receptors (ρ(1)wild-type, EC(50) = 45 μM versus ρ(1)T244S, IC(50) = 417.4 μM, K(B) = 204 μM). This highlights that the interaction of GABOB with T244 is enantioselective. In contrast, the potencies of a range of antagonists tested, 3-aminopropyl(methyl)phosphinic acid (3-APMPA), 3-aminopropylphosphonic acid (3-APA), S- and R-(3-amino-2-hydroxypropyl)methylphosphinic acid (S-(-)-CGP44532 and R-(+)-CGP44533), were not altered. This suggests that T244 is not critical for antagonist binding. Receptor gating is dynamic, and this study highlights the role of loop C in agonist-evoked receptor activation, coupling agonist binding to channel gating.

2-Aminoethyl methylphosphonate, a potent and rapidly acting antagonist of GABA(A)-ρ1 receptors

2-Aminoethyl methylphosphonate (2-AEMP), an analog of GABA, has been found to exhibit antagonist activity at GABA(A)-ρ1 (also known as ρ1 GABA(C)) receptors. The present study was undertaken to elucidate 2-AEMP's action and to test the activities of 2-AEMP analogs. Whole-cell patch-clamp techniques were used to record membrane currents in neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with human GABA(A)-ρ1 receptors. The action of 2-AEMP was compared with that of 1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA), a commonly used GABA(A)-ρ1 antagonist. With 10 μM GABA, 2-AEMP's IC(50) (18 μM) differed by less than 2.5-fold from that of TPMPA (7 μM), and results obtained were consistent with a primarily competitive mode of inhibition by 2-AEMP. Terminating the presentation of 2-AEMP or TPMPA in the presence of GABA produced a release from inhibition. However, the rate of inhibition release upon the termination of 2-AEMP considerably exceeded that determined with termination of TPMPA. Moreover, when presented at concentrations near their respective IC(50) values, the preincubation period associated with 2-AEMP's onset of inhibition was much shorter than that for TPMPA. Analogs of 2-AEMP possessing a benzyl or n-butyl rather than a methyl substituent at the phosphorus atom, as well as analogs bearing a C-methyl substituent on the aminoethyl side chain, exhibited reduced potency relative to 2-AEMP. Of these analogs, only (R)-2-aminopropyl methylphosphonate significantly diminished the response to 10 μM GABA. Structure-activity relationships are discussed in the context of molecular modeling of ligand binding to the antagonist binding site of the GABA(A)-ρ1 receptor.

Medicinal chemistry of ρ GABAC receptors

The inhibitory neurotransmitter, GABA, is a low-molecular-weight molecule that can achieve many low-energy conformations, which are recognized by GABA receptors and transporters. In this article, we assess the structure–activity relationship profiles of GABA analogs at the ionotropic ρ GABAC receptor. Such studies have significantly contributed to the design and development of potent and selective agonists and antagonists for this subclass of GABA receptors. With these tools in hand, the role of ρ GABAC receptors is slowly being realized. Of particular interest is the development of selective phosphinic acid analogs of GABA and their potential use in sleep disorders, inhibiting the development of myopia, and in improving learning and memory.

GABAergic actions on cholinergic laterodorsal tegmental neurons: implications for control of behavioral state

Cholinergic neurons of the pontine laterodorsal tegmentum (LDT) play a critical role in regulation of behavioral state. Therefore, elucidation of mechanisms that control their activity is vital for understanding of how switching between wakefulness, sleep and anesthetic states is effectuated. In vivo studies suggest that GABAergic mechanisms within the pons play a critical role in behavioral state switching. However, the postsynaptic, electrophysiological actions of GABA on LDT neurons, as well as the identity of GABA receptors present in the LDT mediating these actions is virtually unexplored. Therefore, we studied the actions of GABA agonists and antagonists on cholinergic LDT cells by performing patch clamp recordings in mouse brain slices. Under conditions where detection of Cl(-) -mediated events was optimized, GABA induced gabazine (GZ)-sensitive inward currents in the majority of LDT neurons. Post-synaptic location of GABA(A) receptors was demonstrated by persistence of muscimol-induced inward currents in TTX and low Ca(2+) solutions. THIP, a selective GABA(A) receptor agonist with a preference for δ-subunit containing GABA(A) receptors, induced inward currents, suggesting the existence of extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors. LDT cells also possess GABA(B) receptors as baclofen-activated a TTX- and low Ca(2+)-resistant outward current that was attenuated by the GABA(B) antagonists CGP 55845 and saclofen. The tertiapin sensitivity of baclofen-induced outward currents suggests that a G(IRK) mediated this effect. Further, outward currents were never additive with those induced by application of carbachol, suggesting that they were mediated by activation of GABA(B) receptors linked to the same G(IRK) activated in these cells by muscarinic receptor stimulation. Activation of GABA(B) receptors inhibited Ca(2+) increases induced by a depolarizing voltage step shown previously to activate VOCCs in cholinergic LDT neurons. Baclofen-mediated reductions in depolarization-induced Ca(2+) were unaltered by prior emptying of intracellular Ca(2+) stores, but were abolished by low extracellular Ca(2+) and pre-application of nifedipine, indicating that activation of GABA(B) receptors inhibits influx of Ca(2+) involving L-type Ca(2+) channels. Presence of GABA(C) receptors is suggested by the induction of inward current by (E)-4- amino-2-butenoic acid (TACA) and its inhibition by 1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-ylmethylphosphinic (TPMPA), a relatively selective agonist and antagonist, respectively, of GABA(C) receptors. All of these GABA-mediated actions were found to occur in histochemically-identified cholinergic neurons. Taken together, these data indicate for the first time that cholinergic neurons of the LDT exhibit functional GABA(A, B and C) receptors, including extrasynaptically located GABA(A) receptors, which may be tonically activated by synaptic overflow of GABA. Accordingly, the activity of cholinergic LDT neurons is likely to be significantly affected by GABAergic tone within the nucleus, and so, demonstrated effects of GABA on behavioral state may be mediated, in part, via direct actions on cholinergic neurons in the LDT.

A molecular basis for agonist and antagonist actions at GABA(C) receptors

We modelled the N-terminal ligand-binding domain of the rho1 GABA(C) receptor based on the Lymnaea stagnalis acetylcholine-binding protein (L-AChBP) crystal structure using comparative modelling and validated using flexible docking guided by known mutagenesis studies. A range of known rho1 GABA(C) receptor ligands comprising seven full agonists, 10 partial agonists, 43 antagonists and 12 inactive molecules were used to evaluate and validate the models. Of the 50 models identified, six models that allowed flexible ligand docking in accordance with the experimental data were selected and used to study detailed receptor-ligand interactions. The most refined model to accommodate all known active ligands featured a cavity comprising of a volume of 488 A(3). A detailed analysis of the interaction between the rho1 GABA(C) receptor model and the docked ligands revealed possible H-bonds and cation-pi interactions between the different ligands and binding site residues. Based on quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) calculations, the model showed distinctive conformations of loop C that provided a molecular basis for agonist and antagonist actions. Agonists elicit loop C closure, while a more open loop C was observed upon antagonist binding. The model differentiates the role for key residues known to be involved in either binding and/or gating.

Stabilization of zwitterions in solution: GABA analogues

The solution-phase structures of a number of conformationally restricted gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogues are investigated at the MP2/6-31+G* level of theory, using both explicit water molecules and the conductor-like screening solvation model (COSMO) to model solvation. GABA analogues constrained in a cis conformation by either a double bond or cyclopropane ring have the potential to attain either folded, intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded, or partially folded conformations in solution. Systems constrained in a cis conformation by a cyclopentane or cyclopentene ring are more conformationally restricted and exist only in a folded, intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded form. GABA analogues constrained in a trans conformation by either a double bond or cyclopropane ring have the potential to adopt either partially folded or fully extended conformations in solution. Due to a lack of conformational flexibility, analogues that are constrained in a trans conformation by a cyclopentane or cyclopentene ring attain only partially folded conformations. Like GABA, conformationally flexible GABA analogues possess a large number of stable rotamers, and may exist in any or all of these conformations in aqueous solution. The structures of these analogues provide an essential foundation for subsequent structure-activity analysis of ligand binding at GABA receptors and transporters. This work is therefore expected to facilitate the design and development of new biologically active GABA analogues to treat GABA-related neurological disorders.

Enantiomers of cis-constrained and flexible 2-substituted GABA analogues exert opposite effects at recombinant GABA(C) receptors

The effects of the enantiomers of a number of flexible and cis-constrained GABA analogues were tested on GABA(C) receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes using two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology. (1S,2R)-cis-2-Aminomethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid ((+)-CAMP), a potent and full agonist at the rho1 (EC(50) approximately 40 microM, I(max) approximately 100%) and rho 2 (EC(50) approximately 17 microM, I(max) approximately 100%) receptor subtypes, was found to be a potent partial agonist at rho3 (EC(50) approximately 28 microM, I(max) approximately 70%). (1R,2S)-cis-2-Aminomethylcyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid ((-)-CAMP), a weak antagonist at human rho1 (IC(50) approximately 890 microM) and rho2 (IC(50) approximately 400 microM) receptor subtypes, was also found to be a moderately potent antagonist at rat rho3 (IC(50) approximately 180 microM). Similarly, (1R,4S)-4-aminocyclopent-2-ene-1-carboxylic acid ((+)-ACPECA) was a full agonist at rho1 (EC(50) approximately 135 microM, I(max) approximately 100%) and rho2 (EC(50) approximately 60 microM, I(max) approximately 100%), but only a partial agonist at rho3 (EC(50) approximately 112 microM, I(max) approximately 37%), while (1S,4R)-4-aminocyclopent-2-ene-1-carboxylic acid ((-)-ACPECA) was a weak antagonist at all three receptor subtypes (IC(50)>>300 microM). 4-Amino-(S)-2-methylbutanoic acid ((S)-2MeGABA) and 4-amino-(R)-2-methylbutanoic acid ((R)-2MeGABA) followed the same trend, with (S)-2MeGABA acting as a full agonist at the rho1 (EC(50) approximately 65 microM, I(max) approximately 100%), and rho2 (EC(50) approximately 20 microM, I(max) approximately 100%) receptor subtypes, and a partial agonist at rho3 (EC(50) approximately 25 microM, I(max) approximately 90%). (R)-2MeGABA, however, was a moderately potent antagonist at all three receptor subtypes (IC(50) approximately 16 microM at rho1, 125 microM at rho2 and 35 microM at rho3). On the basis of these expanded biological activity data and the solution-phase molecular structures obtained at the MP2/6-31+G* level of ab initio theory, a rationale is proposed for the genesis of this stereoselectivity effect.

Mutations of the 2' proline in the M2 domain of the human GABAC rho1 subunit alter agonist responses

Mutations of the proline residue at the 2' position (P2') within the second transmembrane (M2) domain of the gamma-aminobutyric acid(C) (GABA(C)) rho1 subunit are known to produce receptors with altered pharmacology. In the present study, P2' was mutated to alanine (rho1P2'A), phenylalanine (rho1P2'F), glycine (rho1P2'G) and serine (rho1P2'S). Mutant receptors were characterized using a range of agonists, partial agonists and antagonists. rho1P2'A, rho1P2'G and rho1P2'S receptors were less susceptible than wild-type receptors to agonist activation. Most notably, the partial agonists, (+/-)-trans-2-(aminomethyl)cyclopropanoic acid ((+/-)-TAMP) and imidazole-4-acetic acid (I4AA) were converted to antagonists at rho1P2'G and rho1P2'S receptors and the partial agonist CACA acted as an antagonist at rho1P2'S receptors. In contrast, rho1P2'F receptors were more prone to activation by agonists. A correlation was observed between the pharmacological properties of the mutant receptors and the hydrophobicity of each residue. Unlike the agonists or partial agonists, the affinity of competitive antagonists, (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA) and 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazole[4,5-c]pyridine-3-ol (THIP), did not change significantly between wild-type and mutant receptors. Thus, the results suggest that the agonist/competitive antagonist binding site(s) were not significantly affected by the mutations, but that receptor activation properties altered such that the more hydrophobic the residue at the 2' position, the more prone the receptor is to agonist activation.

Aza-THIP and related analogues of THIP as GABA C antagonists

The potency of a series of eight compounds structurally related with 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP), a potent GABA(A) partial agonist exhibiting GABA(C) rho(1) antagonist effect (K(i)=25 microM), was determined electrophysiologically using homomeric human GABA(C) rho(1) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Protolytic properties (pK(a) values for the acidic bioisosteric groups) and the presence of steric bulk in the molecules appear to be structural parameters of importance for blockade of the GABA(C) rho(1) receptor. Within this series of moderately potent GABA(C) antagonists, only 4,5,6,7-tetrahydropyrazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (Aza-THIP) does not interact detectably with GABA(A) receptors, and Aza-THIP has the potential of being a useful tool for molecular and behavioural pharmacological studies.

trans-4-Amino-2-methylbut-2-enoic acid (2-MeTACA) and (+/-)-trans-2-aminomethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid ((+/-)-TAMP) can differentiate rat rho3 from human rho1 and rho2 recombinant GABA(C) receptors

1. This study investigated the effects of a number of GABA analogues on rat rho3 GABA(C) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes using 2-electrode voltage clamp methods. 2. The potency order of agonists was muscimol (EC(50)=1.9 +/- 0.1 microM) (+)-trans-3-aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acids ((+)-TACP; EC(50)=2.7 +/- 0.9 microM) trans-4-aminocrotonic acid (TACA; EC(50)=3.8 +/-0.3 microM) GABA (EC(50)=4.0 +/- 0.3 microM) > thiomuscimol (EC(50)=24.8 +/- 2.6 microM) > (+/-)-cis-2-aminomethylcyclopropane-carboxylic acid ((+/-)-CAMP; EC(50)=52.6 +/-8.7 microM) > cis-4-aminocrotonic acid (CACA; EC(50)=139.4 +/- 5.2 microM). 3. The potency order of antagonists was (+/-)-trans-2-aminomethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acid ((+/-)-TAMP; K(B)=4.8+/-1.8 microM) (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA; K(B)=4.8 +/-0.8 microM) > (piperidin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (P4MPA; K(B)=10.2+/-2.3 microM) 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]pyridin-3-ol (THIP; K(B)=10.2+/-0.3 microM) imidazole-4-acetic acid (I4AA; K(B)=12.6+/-2.7 microM) > 3-aminopropylphosphonic acid (3-APA; K(B)=35.8+/-13.5 microM). 4. trans-4-Amino-2-methylbut-2-enoic acid (2-MeTACA; 300 microM) had no effect as an agonist or an antagonist indicating that the C2 methyl substituent is sterically interacting with the ligand-binding site of rat rho3 GABA(C) receptors. 5. 2-MeTACA affects rho1 and rho2 but not rho3 GABA(C) receptors. In contrast, (plus minus)-TAMP is a partial agonist at rho1 and rho2 GABA(C) receptors, while at rat rho3 GABA(C) receptors it is an antagonist. Thus, 2-MeTACA and (+/-)-TAMP could be important pharmacological tools because they may functionally differentiate between rho1, rho2 and rho3 GABA(C) receptors in vitro.

The effects of cyclopentane and cyclopentene analogues of GABA at recombinant GABA(C) receptors

The pharmacological effects of the enantiomers of cis-3-aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acids ((+)- and (-)-CACP), the enantiomers of trans-3-aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acids ((+)- and (-)-TACP), and the enantiomers of 4-aminocyclopent-1-ene-1-carboxylic acids ((+)- and (-)-4-ACPCA) were studied on human homomeric rho(1) and rho(2) GABA(C) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes using two-electrode voltage clamp methods. These compounds are conformationally restricted analogues of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) held in a five-membered ring. (+)-TACP (EC(50) (rho(1))=2.7+/-0.2 microM; EC(50) (rho(2))=1.45+/-0.22 microM), (+)-CACP (EC(50) (rho(1))=26.1+/-1.1 microM; EC(50) (rho(2))=20.1+/-2.1 microM) and (-)-CACP (EC(50) (rho(1))=78.5+/-3.5 microM; EC(50) (rho(2))=63.8+/-23.3 microM) were moderately potent partial agonists at rho(1) and rho(2) GABA(C) receptors, while (-)-TACP (100 microM inhibited 56% and 62% of the current produced by 1 microM GABA at rho(1) and rho(2) receptors, respectively) was a weak partial agonist with low intrinsic activity at these receptors. In contrast, (+)-4-ACPCA (K(i) (rho(1))=6.0+/-0.1 microM; K(i) (rho(2))=4.7+/-0.3 microM) did not activate GABA(C) rho(1) and rho(2) receptors but potently inhibited the action of GABA at these receptors, while (-)-4-ACPCA had little effect as either an agonist or an antagonist. The affinity order at both GABA(C) rho(1) and rho(2) receptors was (+)-TACP>(+)-4-ACPCA >> (+)-CACP>(-)-CACP >> (-)-TACP >> (-)-4-ACPCA. This study shows that the cyclopentane and cyclopentene analogues of GABA affect GABA(C) receptors in a unique manner, defining a preferred stereochemical orientation of the amine and carboxylic acid groups when binding to GABA(C) receptors. This is exemplified by the partial agonist, (+)-TACP, and the antagonist, (+)-4-ACPCA.

(+)- and (-)-cis-2-aminomethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acids show opposite pharmacology at recombinant rho(1) and rho(2) GABA(C) receptors

The effects of the enantiomers of (+/-)-CAMP and (+/-)-TAMP [(+/-)-cis- and (+/-)-trans-2-aminomethylcyclopropanecarboxylic acids, respectively], which are cyclopropane analogues of GABA, were tested on GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes using two-electrode voltage clamp methods. (+)-CAMP was found to be a potent and full agonist at homooligomeric GABA(C) receptors (K:(D) approximately 40 microM: and I:(max) approximately 100% at rho(1); K:(D) approximately 17 microM: and I:(max) approximately 100% at rho(2)) but a very weak antagonist at alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2L) GABA(A) receptors. In contrast, (-)-CAMP was a very weak antagonist at both alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2L) GABA(A) receptors and homooligomeric GABA(C) receptors (IC(50) approximately 900 microM: at rho(1) and approximately 400 microM: at rho(2)). Furthermore, (+)-CAMP appears to be a superior agonist to the widely used GABA(C) receptor partial agonist cis-4-aminocrotonic acid (K:(D) approximately 74 microM: and I:(max) approximately 78% at rho(1); K:(D) approximately 70 microM: and I:(max) approximately 82% at rho(2)). (-)-TAMP was the most potent of the cyclopropane analogues on GABA(C) receptors (K:(D) approximately 9 microM: and I:(max) approximately 40% at rho(1); K:(D) approximately 3 microM: and I:(max) approximately 50-60% at rho(2)), but it was also a moderately potent GABA(A) receptor partial agonist (K:(D) approximately 50-60 microM: and I:(max) approximately 50% at alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2L) GABA(A) receptors). (+)-TAMP was a less potent partial agonist at GABA(C) receptors (K:(D) approximately 60 microM: and I:(max) approximately 40% at rho(1); K:(D) approximately 30 microM: and I:(max) approximately 60% at rho(2)) and a weak partial agonist at alpha(1)beta(2)gamma(2L) GABA(A) receptors (K:(D) approximately 500 micro: and I:(max) approximately 50%). None of the isomers of (+/-)-CAMP and (+/-)-TAMP displayed any interaction with GABA transport at the concentrations tested. Molecular modeling based on the present results provided new insights into the chiral preferences for either agonism or antagonism at GABA(C) receptors.

Aminomethyl-2,6-difluorophenols as a novel class of increased lipophilicity GABA(C) receptor antagonists

3- and 4-(Aminomethyl)-2,6-difuorophenols were tested for activity against the three major classes of GABA receptors. 4-(Amninomethyl)-2,6difluorophenol was shown to be a competitive and somewhat selective antagonist at p1 GABA(C) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes (K(B) = 75.5 microM with a 95% Confidence Interval range of 75.2 microM to 75.8 microM). This is the first in a novel class of increased lipophilicity GABA(C) receptor antagonists with little activity at alpha1beta2gamma2 GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors.

GABA(C) receptor antagonists differentiate between human rho1 and rho2 receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes

The selective GABA(C) receptor antagonist, (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA), is eight times more potent against human recombinant p receptors than p2 receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. (3-Aminopropyl)methylphosphinic acid (CGP35024), the methylphosphinic acid analogue of GABA, and [(E)-3-aminopropen-1-yl]methylphosphinic acid (CGP44530), an open chain analogue of TPMPA, were five and four times, respectively, more potent as antagonists of p1 receptors than as antagonists of p2 receptors. Isoguvacine was a weak partial agonist at both p1 and p2 receptors with intrinsic activities (calculated as a percentage of the maximum whole cell current produced by a maximum dose of GABA) of 45 and 68%, respectively, of the maximum response produced by GABA. In agreement with other workers, it was found that imidazole-4-acetic acid was a partial agonist at both p1 and p2 receptors, showing higher intrinsic activity at p2 than at p1 receptors. The p1 receptor antagonist, trans-4-amino-2-methylbut-2-enoic acid (2-MeTACA), was a partial agonist at p2 receptors with an intrinsic activity of 34%. 2-MeTACA may be useful in differentiating between homo-oligomeric p1 and p2 receptors in native systems. These studies reveal significant differences in the antagonist profile of human recombinant p1 and p2 GABA(C) receptors.