Purging and haemopoietic progenitor cell selection by CD34+ cell separation

CD34(+) hematopoietic progenitor cell selection of bone marrow grafts for autologous transplantation in pediatric patients

CD34(+)-selection of hematopoietic grafts for patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is frequently used to obtain a tumor-free graft. The majority of published experience is with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) products; only scant information has been published on bone marrow (BM) grafts. We reviewed our experience using CD34(+) selection of BM grafts in children undergoing autologous BM transplantation. After obtaining institutional approval, we performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent autologous stem cell collection at St. Jude. From January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2003, 373 patients underwent autologous HSCT; 131 received marrow grafts, 237 received PBSC grafts, and 5 received a combination. Seventeen patients underwent BM harvests for CD34(+) selection of their stem cell grafts. Sixteen patients received 19 CD34 purified grafts processed on the Isolex 300i Magnetic Cell Selection System device. Four patients were not included in the engraftment analysis as 1 did not receive the collected product, 1 received a tandem product, and 2 received products that were composed of 2 or 3 combined purified products. Following selection, marrow grafts contained a median of 1.4 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg (range: 0.09-8.3 x 10(6)/kg) and a median of 0.014 x10(8) total nucleated cell cells/kg (range: 0.001-0.09 x 10(8)/kg). The median CD34% recovery was 30.9% (range: 9.3%-57.1%), with the median CD34 purity being 95.5% (range: 62.2%-98.8%). All patients engrafted. The median time to absolute neutrophil count > or = 500/mm(3) was 19 days (range: 12-35 days), and to platelet recovery was 28 days (range 18-37 days). No patient died from transplant-related complications. Our study demonstrates that CD34(+)-selection of marrow grafts is feasible, and these grafts are able to successfully reconstitute hematopoiesis in patients undergoing autologous BMT.

Ex vivo purging by adenoviral p53 gene therapy does not affect NOD-SCID repopulating activity of human CD34+ cells

Co-incubation of a replication-deficient, recombinant adenovirus carrying the wild-type p53 gene (rAd-p53) and hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) products from patients with breast cancer can significantly reduce tumor cell contamination. Whereas this approach provides a powerful tumor cell purging strategy, potential detrimental effects on the HSC population have not been investigated. The ability of human HSC to reconstitute hematopoiesis in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice and to undergo secondary transplantation provides the only nonclinical measure of self-renewing, stem cell function. The objective of this study was to investigate whether co-incubation with rAd-p53 compromised the SCID repopulating activity (SRA) of HSC. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized human CD34+ cells were co-cultured with rAd-p53 at our targeted clinical dose, and the ability of these cells to establish multilineage hematopoiesis in sublethally irradiated, nonobese diabetic (NOD)-SCID mice was investigated. The persistence of human cells in the mice was investigated by flow cytometry, granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit assay, and polymerase chain reaction of human Alu sequences. Further, limiting dilution analysis provided a quantitative comparison between the SRA of CD34+ cells co-incubated with rAd-p53 and control CD34+ cells (no rAd-p53 co-incubation). We conclude that co-incubation with rAd-p53 has little effect on the SRA of HSC.

Influence of Preharvest Tumor Cell Contamination in Bone Marrow or Blood Does Not Predict Resultant Tumor Cell Contamination of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Mobilized Stem Cells

Tumor cell contamination of stem cell collections harvested from breast cancer patients is a common phenomenon described by several investigators but with findings that vary among reports. Although so-called co-mobilization of these cells has been hypothesized, the origin of tumor cell contamination in stem cells is still unknown. A total of 47 G-CSF mobilized stem cell grafts from patients with nodal-positive (n = 30), chemosensitive metastatic (n = 11), and 5 women with inflammatory breast cancer were evaluated for cancer cells by immunocytochemistry. Additionally, 40 bone marrow aspirations and 23 peripheral blood samples collected prior to apheresis and after one to two cycles of conventional chemotherapy were available for examination. Tumor cell contamination of leukapheresis correlated best with preharvest blood state. This was valid when the nominal (positive/negative) presence of tumor cells in blood was compared to the nominal presence of tumor cells in apheresis samples and when the it was correlated to the tumor cell load of apheresis samples (TCL = tumor cells per 10(6) nucleated cells investigated). The correlation between blood and stem cells was better (nominal and quantitative) than that between marrow and stem cells, despite the larger sample size of marrow aspirations. The presence or absence of cancer cells in apheresis samples could not be safely predicted by the presence or absence of tumor cells in marrow or blood alone. Diagnostic specificity seems to improve from a combination of results from marrow and blood analysis. No correlation was found in quantitative analysis of tumor cell contamination between marrow and blood. In conclusion, the results suggest that blood and bone marrow represent different compartments for epithelial cancer cells and that contaminating tumor cells in stem cell harvests may be derived from the blood and/or marrow compartment. The tumor cell contamination of a stem cell harvest cannot be safely predicted by a preceding blood or marrow analysis.

Large-scale mobilization and isolation of CD34+ cells from normal donors

We describe collection and purification of peripheral blood CD34+ cells from volunteer, normal donors and allogeneic stem cell donors. A total of 98 aphereses were performed on 68 volunteer donors using peripheral venous access. The mean number of nucleated cells collected was 4.6 x 10(10) which included 1.9 x 10(8) CD34+ cells corresponding to 2.7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. The number of CD34+ cells collected did not differ between males and females but did correlate with the donor's weight and the total number of nucleated cells collected. The Nexell Isolex 300i cell separator was used to isolate CD34+ cells from 30 of the collections. A mean of 0.36% of the total cells was recovered and included 43 +/- 18% of the CD34+ cells. CD34+ cells represented 85 +/- 11% of the recovered cells. The total number of CD34+ cells recovered was not influenced by the number of nucleated cells placed on the Isolex 300i. The percentage of CD34+ cells recovered was not related to the number of CD34+ cells placed on the Isolex 300i. The purity of the final product was influenced by the number of CD34+ cells but not the total number of nucleated cells. An additional 38 CD34+ cell isolations were performed on normal allogeneic stem cell donors with similar results. These observations further support the safety and feasibility of peripheral blood CD34+ cell collection and purification.

Overview of autologous stem cell transplantation

There has been a dramatic increase in the number of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplants over the last decade. Faster recovery of cell counts, lesser transplant morbidity, shorter hospital stay and reduced cost compared with marrow autografts have been the main advantages of autologous peripheral blood cell over marrow transplants. In this paper we attempt to review the advances in the biology and mobilization of stem cells, and focus on clinical results of autologous peripheral stem cell and marrow transplants for disease specific sites such as breast cancer, myeloma, autoimmune diseases, germ cell tumors, the acute and chronic leukemias, the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease. We also discuss transplant related complications, gene therapy and the different methods of purging. This review was intended for autologous peripheral stem cell transplants, however, unavoidably, it also discusses autologous marrow transplantation and aspects common to both procedures.

Immunologic methods of purging in autologous stem cell transplantation

Malignant cells in the stem cell product have been shown to contribute to disease recurrence in patients who relapse after autologous transplantation. Immunologic methods of purging tumor cells from stem cell products focus on either removal of specific target cells or positive selection of HPC. mAb are the key component of many purging strategies and are employed both in vitro and in vivo. Cytotoxic cellular therapies are an emerging method of tumor cell eradication.

Is there a role for intensive therapy in breast cancer?

With reference to survival, polychemotherapy has been demonstrated to be statistically significantly more effective than monochemotherapy both in the adjuvant setting and in the metastatic situation. Breast cancer demonstrates a dose-response relationship. Chemotherapy used in the conventional dose range should be given with adequate dose-intensity both in the adjuvant setting and for metastatic patients. More dose-intensive combinations are almost always associated with a higher response rate in patients' metastatic disease, but these results have seldom been translated into an improved survival. For marrow requiring high-dose therapy, repeated phase II studies have demonstrated the possibility of a survival tail, which may be due to stage migration and patient selection. At present we have at least 13 ongoing phase III studies in the adjuvant setting and at least 5 ongoing studies in the metastatic situation. These studies will give a definite answer on whether marrow-supported high-dose therapy is better than conventional therapy or if alternative approaches using tailored therapy will result in an equivalent outcome. In the future we must make better use of the present arsenal of drugs and examine the marked inter-individual variations in pharmacokinetic profiles for the drugs. We have to tailor the therapy to the tumour biological profile, in both the primary tumour and metastases with appreciation of heterogeneity and tumour progression. Based on these prerequisites, therapy can be either dose-intensive or in some instances continuous using lower doses.

Identification of a peptide directed against the anti-CD34 antibody, 9C5, by phage display and its use in hematopoietic stem cell selection

A peptide sequence was identified by phage display technology that could be used as an alternative to chymopapain for the release of hematopoietic progenitor cells captured by anti-CD34 monoclonal antibodies. This was achieved by affinity selection screening (biopanning) of a random hexapeptide sequence phage display library. Four rounds of biopanning were performed to enrich for phage clones with specific affinity for anti-CD34 monoclonal antibody, 9C5. DNA sequence analyses of these phage clones revealed an enrichment of two predominant sequences, QQGWFP and TQGSFW. These two clones also shared a consensus sequence motif, QGxF, that exhibited 50% and 67% homology with a region spanning amino acids 14-19 of the mature CD34 antigen. Based on these data, synthetic peptides were generated and assessed for their ability to release 9C5 from CD34+ cells. Using a flow cytometric assay, it was found that the synthetic peptide, 9069N, effectively released 9C5 from the CD34-expressing cell line, KG1a, in a concentration-dependent manner (77% and 99% release of 9C5 at 0.14 and 0.70 mM peptide concentrations, respectively). In the Isolex 300i immunomagnetic selection system, this peptide was shown to be effective at releasing 9C5 sensitized CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors from sheep anti-mouse IgG Dynabeads. Thus, a synthetic peptide, which specifically and efficiently released immunomagnetically selected hematopoietic progenitor cells from paramagnetic beads, was identified. This reagent is a significant advance in the selection of hematopoietic progenitors in that it does not alter cell surface antigens. As such, further phenotypic characterization or immunoselection can be performed.