A new coronal imaging plane for magnetic resonance imaging of the temporomandibular joint disc

Interrelationship between temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (OA) and cervical spine pain: Effects of intra-articular injection with hyaluronic acid

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate cervical spine pain and function after five sessions of viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Forty-nine patients, (79% females, aged between 43-81 years), affected by TMJ osteoarthritis and concurrent cervical spine pain and limited function were recruited. All patients underwent a cycle of five weekly arthrocenteses and viscosupplementation with 1 ml of medium molecular weight HA according to the single-needle arthrocentesis technique. Outcome variables were TMJ pain (VAS), cervical active ranges of motion, cervical disability (NPDS), and presence of painful palpation sites. Assessments were carried out at baseline and at one, three and six months after the end of treatment protocol.

RESULTS

A significant reduction over time was shown both in TMJ pain levels and in NPDS values with respect to baseline (p < 0.001). Most parameters of active cervical range of motion showed an improvement with time. Benefits remained stable throughout six months after the viscosupplementation protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

A protocol of TMJ intra articular arthrocentesis and viscosupplementation improved cervical function and reduced disability in patients with concurrent cervical spine pain. These findings add to the complex amount of literature on the relationship between temporomandibular disorders and cervical spine disorders.

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position in patients with TMJ pain assessed by coronal MRI

OBJECTIVES

To assess the position of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc in patients with TMJ pain and compare it with equivalent published data of asymptomatic volunteers.

METHODS

The oblique coronal closed- and open-jaw MR images from 66 patients with TMJ pain were evaluated. Clinical examination followed the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. In all coronal images, the transverse condylar axis and the medial and lateral edges of the disc were determined using special software. Inter-rater agreement was calculated [two raters; inter-rater correlation coefficient (ICC)]. The presence of osteoarthrosis (OA) was determined by two independent raters. The influence of OA was estimated in patients (generalized estimation equation model). The results were compared with those of healthy volunteers (t-test). Differences between closed and open jaw in patients were analysed with the Wilcoxon matched-pair test.

RESULTS

The ICC was good for the transverse condylar axis (0.987) and the medial edge of the disc (0.799) and fair for the lateral edge (0.355). On average, the disc projected 5.5% to the medial side; laterally, the condyle was partially uncovered by the disc (-16.6%). In the open-jaw position, both the medial and the lateral edges shifted medially (to 17.6% vs -23.6%, Wilcoxon matched-pair test, p < 0.001). OA had no significant influence (generalized estimation equation model, p = 0.952). The disc position differed significantly from asymptomatic individuals (t-test, p < 0.001) who showed a medial disc position and full coverage of the condyle.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with TMJ pain, the disc seems to be smaller and located less medially than in healthy volunteers. The extent of the medial shift on opening was similar.

Web-based calibration of observers using MRI of the temporomandibular joint

OBJECTIVES

Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMDs) were proposed in 1992 with the aim of standardizing and testing methods for diagnosing TMDs. RDC/TMDs have so far been lacking standardized methods for imaging and criteria for imaging diagnosis of disorders of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Criteria for disorders of the TMJ have recently been proposed for MRI. The aim of this study was to publish MR images of the TMJ on the web and to test the agreement of five observers using the criteria.

METHODS

20 cases of MRI of the TMJ were published on the web together with the criteria. The MR images were taken in closed and open mouth positions, and sagittal and coronal views. Five observers diagnosed disc position, disc shape, joint effusion and loose calcified bodies in the TMJ.

RESULTS

In all cases except one, three or more observers agreed upon the diagnosis. All agreed on whether a loose calcified body was present or not. The second best agreement was obtained for disc position in the sagittal view, where all observers agreed in 16 of the 20 cases. For disc position in the coronal view and the evaluation of the disc shape, observer agreement was lower.

CONCLUSION

Criteria were useful in order to standardize and simplify evaluation and thereby probably increase the diagnostic outcome among different observers for MRI of the TMJ. We recommend that the criteria be used internationally to facilitate comparisons between different studies.

The relationship between temporomandibular dysfunction and head and cervical posture

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of any correlation between disc displacement and parameters used for evaluation of skull positioning in relation to the cervical spine: craniocervical angle, suboccipital space between C0-C1, cervical curvature and position of the hyoid bone in individuals with and without symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The patients were evaluated following the guidelines set forth by RDC/TMD. Evaluation was performed by magnetic resonance imaging for establishment of disc positioning in the temporomandibular joints (TMJs) of 30 volunteer patients without temporomandibular dysfunction symptoms and 30 patients with symptoms. Evaluation of skull positioning in relation to the cervical spine was performed on lateral cephalograms achieved with the individual in natural head position. Data were submitted to statistical analysis by Fisher's exact test at 5% significance level. To measure the degree of reproducibility/agreements between surveys, the kappa (K) statistics was used.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed between C0-C1 measurement for both symptomatic (p=0.04) and asymptomatic (p=0.02). No statistical differences were observed regarding craniocervical angle, C1-C2 and hyoid bone position in relation to the TMJs with and without disc displacement. Although statistically significant difference was found in the C0-C1 space, no association between these and internal temporomandibular joint disorder can be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results observed in this study, no direct relationship could be determined between the presence of disc displacement and the variables assessed.

Validity of temporomandibular disorder examination procedures for assessment of temporomandibular joint status

INTRODUCTION

This hypothesis-generating study was performed to determine which items in the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and additional diagnostic tests have the best predictive accuracy for joint-related diagnoses.

METHODS

One hundred forty-nine TMD patients and 43 symptom-free subjects were examined in clinical examinations and with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The importance of each variable of the clinical examination for correct joint-related diagnosis was assessed by using MRI diagnoses. For this purpose, "random forest" statistical software (based on classification trees) was used.

RESULTS

Maximum unassisted jaw opening, maximum assisted jaw opening, history of locked jaw, joint sound with and without compression, joint pain, facial pain, pain on palpation of the lateral pterygoid area, and overjet proved suitable for distinguishing between subtypes of joint-related TMD. Measurement of excursion, protrusion, and midline deviation were less important.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity of clinical TMD examination procedures can be enhanced by using the 16 variables of greatest importance identified in this study. In addition to other variables, maximum unassisted and assisted opening and a history of locked jaw were important when assessing the status of the TMJ.

Assessment of the reliability and validity of panoramic imaging for assessment of mandibular condyle morphology using both MRI and clinical examination as the gold standard

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate both reliability and validity of the assessment of the shape of the mandibular condyle in panoramic images of the TMJ.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty subjects were included and were examined according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. Panoramic radiographs (PRs) and magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were completed for all subjects. Both MRIs and PRs were rated by raters blinded to the clinical diagnosis. Kappa statistics were used to compare the results of the raters of the PRs. Additionally, the specificity and the sensitivity of the PRs were calculated for 2 scenarios: one with MRI and the other with clinical findings as the gold standard.

RESULTS

The sensitivity was 0.94 (specificity = 0.45) for the assumption that MRI is the gold standard and 0.86 (specificity = 0.49) for the assumption that the clinical examination is the gold standard. For reliability, the results for kappa ranged from 0.06 to 0.327.

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that PRs are not a reliable method of accurately judging the shape of the mandibular condyle.

Temporomandibular joint disk position assessed at coronal MR imaging in asymptomatic volunteers

PURPOSE

To assess the normal position of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk relative to the condyle by using coronal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in asymptomatic volunteers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the review committee for human research, and all subjects signed an informed consent form. Thirty symptom-free volunteers without histories of TMJ disorders underwent standardized clinical examinations. Afterward, bilateral sagittal oblique and coronal oblique MR images were acquired with the patient's mouth opened and closed. The coronal oblique opened- and closed-mouth images were analyzed by using computer software. The medial and lateral edges of both the TMJ disk and the condyle were marked for these imaging examinations by using the section through the posterior 3 mm of the disk. To eliminate the effect of different magnifications and/or distortions, the distance between these points was measured automatically and divided by the largest mediolateral dimensions of the condyle. To assess the reliability of the measurements, four observers evaluated the position of the disk in the coronal plane. To assess the changes in position of the posterior 3 mm of the disk in the coronal plane in the closed- and opened-mouth positions, the Wilcoxon signed rank test for matched pairs was used. Interobserver measurement reliability was evaluated by using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

RESULTS

Analysis of the coronal closed-mouth disk position revealed a medial position of the TMJ disk relative to the condyle in 11 (21%) of 52 analyzed joints. In the opened-mouth position, the medial location of the disk was more frequent: 29 (85%) of 34 analyzed joints exhibited a medial position of the disk relative to the condyle in this plane. This increasingly medial position of the disk was statistically significant (P < or = .001). Measurement reliability assessment revealed sufficient results (ICC > or = 0.7).

CONCLUSION

At both closed- and opened-mouth MR imaging, a medially located TMJ disk seems to be within the normal range of variation. The disk seems to shift even more medially when the mouth is opened.

[Temporomandibular joint: MRI diagnostics]

MRI of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) requires 1.5 T. The radiologist must be familiar with the anatomy and pathology of the TMJ. This review gives a description of MRI protocols for the TMJ, and MRI anatomy and pathology of the TMJ (open and closed mouth) by means of MR images and drawings. Diagnosing of the TMJ related diseases depends on standardized clinical and MR examinations. Therefore close interdisciplinary cooperation between dentist and radiologist is necessary.

Temporomandibular joint pathosis in patients with myofascial pain: a comparative analysis of magnetic resonance imaging and a clinical examination based on a specific set of criteria

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the prevalence of joint diseases in patients with either of 2 forms of myofascial pain (with and without limited mouth opening) and to verify the accuracy of temporomandibular joint-related clinical diagnoses through the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

STUDY DESIGN

On the basis of the results of a clinical examination carried out according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), 61 patients were divided into 2 subgroups. The first group consisted of 36 patients who had myofascial pain with limited mouth opening (MPLO), whereas the other 25 patients were diagnosed with myofascial pain without limited mouth opening. MRI was carried out on all patients. The clinical joint-related diagnoses from RDC/TMD were compared with MRI results.

RESULTS

Patients with MPLO often had joint diseases that were not detected by means of a clinical examination alone. The kappa statistic was used to compare MRI and clinical diagnoses, confirming poor agreement in patients with MPLO (kappa=0.13) and acceptable agreement in patients with myofascial pain without limited mouth opening (kappa=0.72).

CONCLUSION

Restricted mandibular mobility is frequently associated with temporomandibular joint diseases that were not identified during a clinical examination. Therefore, an adaptation of the classification scheme used for the RDC/TMDs may result in the improvement of the sensitivity of clinical joint-related diagnoses, especially in patients with MPLO.

Disk position and the bilaminar zone of the temporomandibular joint in asymptomatic young individuals by magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVE

The purpose was to study the disk position of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in young individuals without any clinical signs or symptoms or history of internal derangement or degenerative joint disease and to study the features of the bilaminar zone of the TMJ in sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) images and the behavior of the bilaminar zone during jaw opening.

STUDY DESIGN

MR imaging examinations of 80 TMJs of 40 symptom-free healthy subjects (20 women and 20 men) with a mean age of 26.9 years formed the basis of this study.

RESULTS

In 33 of the 40 symptom-free subjects (82.5%), there was a normal relationship between disk and condyle at occlusion, whereas 5 individuals had unilateral disk displacement and 2 had bilateral disk displacement. The superior part of the bilaminar zone could be identified in all of the 40 symptom-free subjects. The inferior band of the bilaminar zone was identified bilaterally in 57.5% of individuals and unilaterally in 20%. In 9 subjects, the inferior band of the bilaminar zone could not be identified in any of the TMJs.

CONCLUSIONS

Disk displacement of the TMJ occurred in approximately 20% of the young individuals in this sample. The use of both sagittal and oblique coronal MR images is of importance for classification of the position of the disk in that the oblique coronal imaging plane rendered significant complementary information to that of the sagittal images. The identification of both the superior and the posterior band of the bilaminar zone must be considered new information. The superior band remained consistently in contact with the fossa at the open-mouth position.

Comparison of clinical and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis in patients with disk displacement in the temporomandibular joint

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to validate the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) for the diagnostic subgroup of disk displacement with reduction, with magnetic resonance imaging used as a gold standard.

STUDY DESIGN

The diagnoses from the clinical examination of 78 joints in 39 patients, each with disk displacement with reduction in at least one TMJ, were compared with magnetic resonance imaging diagnoses. The readers of the magnetic resonance images were blinded to the clinical diagnoses. The data analysis included kappa statistics and calculation of predictive values.

RESULTS

The predictive value of the RDC/TMD for disk displacement with reduction was 0.65. For disk displacement alone-the movement of the disk on opening not being considered-the predictive value was 0.92. The diagnostic agreement between RDC/TMD and magnetic resonance imaging diagnoses for all joints examined was 53.8%. Most of the disagreement was due to false negative clinical diagnoses for asymptomatic joints.

CONCLUSIONS

A positive RDC/TMD examination is predictive for internal derangement but not reliable with regard to the type of disk displacement; such examination is therefore of limited value in determining the true disk position and its functional movements.