Fornix vs limbal-based trabeculectomy with mitomycin C

Endophthalmitis and blebitis following deep sclerectomy and trabeculectomy with routine use of mitomycin C

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the incidence for endophthalmitis and blebitis after deep sclerectomy (DS) and trabeculectomy with routine use of Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.4 mg/ml.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of patients who underwent surgery 1/2008-4/2020 were reviewed. Cumulative incidence for bleb-associated infection (BAI), including both endophthalmitis and blebitis, was calculated with cumulative incidence function (CIF) and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Risk factors for BAI were evaluated with univariate competing risk regression analysis and Log-rank analysis. Competing event in CIF was death.

RESULTS

In this retrospective single-centre cohort study, a total of 2653 patients and 3411 eyes underwent surgery: 3478 glaucoma surgeries, 2419 DS and 1059 trabeculectomies. Two cases of endophthalmitis and three of isolated blebitis developed. Median follow-up from the most recent surgery on the eye until the end of the study was 5.5 years, and until last visit at the ophthalmology department was 1.9 years. For the whole follow-up period in CIF-analysis, cumulative incidence for BAI was 0.16% (95% CI 0.06-0.36) at five years. Incidence was higher with eyes not treated with an antifibrotic during surgery (sub-hazard ratio 11.66, 95% CI 1.94-70.21, p = 0.007). Cumulative incidence between surgery and last visit with Kaplan-Meier analysis was 0.21% (95% CI 0.08-0.52) at five years, similarly, not using an antifibrotic increased incidence (Log-rank p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Cumulative incidence for BAI was low despite routine use of high-dose MMC.

Analysis of risk factors and ocular hypotony characteristics in choroidal detachment after penetrating glaucoma surgery

PURPOSE

To analyze the risk factors and ocular hypotony characteristics of choroidal detachment (CD) after penetrating glaucoma surgery and to compare between eyes with and without CD.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 173 eyes of 168 patients. Patients who underwent trabeculectomy or Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation due to medically uncontrolled glaucoma and who had intraocular pressure (IOP) < 9 mmHg at any time during the first postoperative week were included.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 61 (36.3%) females and 107 (63.7%) males with a mean age of 60.7 ± 14.2 years. The postoperative median follow-up time was 24 months (range, 12-40 months). Postoperatively, CD developed in 47 (27.1%) eyes. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that eyes with high preoperative IOP (> 40 mmHg) were 12.1 times more likely to develop CD (p = 0.000) and that presence of IOP < 9 mmHg on the first day of surgery increased the CD risk 3.8 times (p = 0.002); male gender raised the risk 2.7 times (p = 0.028). The mean preoperative IOP in CD eyes was significantly higher than in non-CD eyes (p = 0.000). The mean IOP change between preoperative and lowest IOP was significantly greater in those with CD than in those without CD (p = 0.000). The mean lowest IOP in the CD eyes was significantly lower than in the non-CD eyes (p = 0.037). For the surgical failure rate, no significant difference was found between the CD and the non-CD groups (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrated that high preoperative IOP, presence of IOP < 9 mmHg on the first postoperative day, and male gender were significantly associated with CD after penetrating glaucoma surgery. Choroidal detachment accompanied by hypotony did not affect the final outcome negatively.

Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is one of the leading largely preventable causes of blindness in the world. It is usually  addressed first medically with topical intraocular pressure-lowering drops or by laser trabeculoplasty. In cases where such treatment fails, glaucoma-filtering surgery such as trabeculectomy, is commonly considered. Surgeons can differ in their technique when performing trabeculectomy, for example, the choice of the type of the conjunctival flap (fornix- or limbal-based). In a fornix-based flap, the surgical wound is performed at the corneal limbus; while in a limbal-based flap, the incision is further away. Many studies in the literature compare fornix- and limbal-based trabeculectomy with respect to outcomes and complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effectiveness of fornix- versus limbal-based conjunctival flaps in trabeculectomy for adult glaucoma, with a specific focus on intraocular pressure (IOP) control and complication rates (adverse effects).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2021, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP. The date of the search was 23 March 2021. There were no restrictions to language or year of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing the benefits and complications of fornix- versus limbal-based trabeculectomy for glaucoma, irrespective of glaucoma type, publication status, and language. We excluded studies on children less than 18 years of age, since wound healing is different in this age group and the rate of bleb scarring postoperatively is high.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures as per Cochrane criteria.  MAIN RESULTS: We did not identify any new eligible studies for this review update. As presented in the original review, we included six trials with a total of 361 participants. Two studies were conducted in the USA and one each in Germany, Greece, India, and Saudi Arabia. The participants of four trials had open-angle glaucoma; one study included participants with primary open-angle or primary closed-angle glaucoma, and one study did not specify the type of glaucoma. Three studies used a combined procedure (phacotrabeculectomy). Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) was performed in four studies, and trabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was performed in only one study. None of the included trials reported trabeculectomy failure at 24 months. Only one trial reported the failure rate of trabeculectomy as a late complication. Failure was higher among participants randomised to the limbal-based surgery: 1/50 eyes failed trabeculectomy in the fornix group compared with 3/50 in the limbal group (Peto odds ratio  0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 2.61)); therefore we are very uncertain as to the relative effect of the two procedures on failure rate. Four studies including 252 participants provided measures of mean IOP at 12 months. In the fornix-based surgeries, mean IOP ranged from 12.5 to 15.5 mmHg and similar results were noted in limbal-based surgeries with mean IOP ranging from 11.7 to 15.1 mmHg without significant difference. Mean difference was 0.44 mmHg (95% CI -0.45 to 1.33; 247 eyes) and 0.86 mmHg, (95% CI -0.52 to 2.24; 139 eyes) at 12 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. Neither of these pooled analyses showed a statistically significant difference in IOP between groups (moderate certainty evidence). One trial reported number of anti-glaucoma medications at 24 months of follow-up with no difference noted between surgical groups. However, three trials reported the mean number of anti-glaucoma medications at 12 months of follow-up without significant difference in the mean number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications between the two surgical techniques. Mean difference was 0.02, (95% CI -0.15 to 0.19) at 12 months of follow-up (high certainty evidence). Because of the small numbers of events and total participants, the risk of many reported adverse events was uncertain and those that were found to be statistically significant may have been due to chance. For risk of bias assessment: although all six trials were randomised selection bias was mostly unclear, with unclear random sequence generation in four of the six studies and unclear allocation concealment in five of the six studies. Attrition bias was encountered in only one trial which also suffered from reporting bias. All other trials had an unclear risk of reporting bias as there was no access to study protocols. All included trials were judged to have high risk of detection bias due to lack of masking of the outcomes. Trabeculectomy is quite a standard procedure and unlikely to induce bias due to surgeon 'performance', hence performance bias was not evaluated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The main result of this review was that there was uncertainty as to the difference between fornix- and limbal-based trabeculectomy surgeries due to the small number of events and confidence intervals that cross the null. This also applied to postoperative complications, but without any impact on long-term failure rate between the two surgical techniques.

Merits of conjunctival frill incision in reducing trabeculectomy-induced astigmatism and patient discomfort

Purpose

To compare results of a novel "conjunctival frill/smile incision" on surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and patient discomfort vs conventional trabeculectomy in the initial postoperative period.

Methods

Sixty trabeculectomy cases were subjected to either conjunctival frill incision, performed 1.5-2.0 mm from the limbus (study group) or conventional fornix-based conjunctival flap (control group). Corneal astigmatism and suture-induced discomfort were assessed by keratometry and a self-devised patient questionnaire, respectively.

Results

Both groups generated a "with the rule" SIA, which was 1.77 vs 2.42 at 1 week and reduced to 1.27 vs 1.8 in the study vs control group, after removal of sutures - both scleral flap releasable and conjunctival at 1 month. Patient discomfort score revealed enhanced comfort in 37% of patients (study group) vs 17% (control group) during the early postoperative period. After 1 month of surgery, good comfort was regained in all cases.

Conclusion

This novel suturing technique results in reduced SIA, patient discomfort during the 1st month after trabeculectomy.

Lifetime visual outcomes of patients undergoing trabeculectomy

BACKGROUND

The most important outcome for patients undergoing trabeculectomy is to maintain the quality of life in their remaining years. This study quantifies end of life vision in terms of visual acuity (VA) and visual field status.

METHODS

A prospective service evaluation of patients undergoing trabeculectomy (from 2000 to 2012) who died prior to the study evaluation point (November 2018). Demographic data including socioeconomic status were collected and change in clinical measurement for the cohort between time of surgery and death was measured.

RESULTS

160 of 659 patients had died (24.3%), 4 were excluded due to insufficient data, leaving 156 patients (196 eyes) for evaluation. Male-to-female ratio was 3:2, 86% of patients were Caucasian. Mean age at surgery on first eye was 76.5 years (SD 9.0). Life expectancy post-trabeculectomy was 7.5 years (0.1-17.2). Mean change in VA was logarithm of the mean angle of resolution (LogMAR) 0.32 (SD 0.59) and visual field mean deviation progressed at a median of -0.44 dB/year (from -5.98 to 3.9) for eyes with at least a year of follow-up. Severe vision loss (loss of ≥10 letters on LogMAR) occurred in 78 eyes (40%) of which 18 (9%) were due to glaucoma, 69 patients (44%) required glaucoma drops at end of life.

CONCLUSION

Trabeculectomy is successful in slowing or preventing further glaucoma progression and thus maintaining visual function in the majority of eyes for the remainder of life. For those with severe vision loss at the end of life, only one in four was due to further progression of their glaucoma.

Fornix-Based Versus Limbal-Based Conjunctival Trabeculectomy Flaps for Glaucoma: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To compare effectiveness of fornix- and limbal-based conjunctival flaps in trabeculectomy surgery.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

Setting: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, ISRCTN registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO, and ICTRP were searched to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

STUDY POPULATION

RCTs in which benefits and complications of fornix- vs limbal-based trabeculectomy for glaucoma were compared in adult glaucoma patients.

OBSERVATION PROCEDURE

We followed Cochrane methodology for data extraction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Proportion of failed trabeculectomies at 24 months, defined as the need for repeat surgery or uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) >22 mm Hg, despite topical/systemic medications.

RESULTS

The review included 6 trials with a total of 361 participants, showing no difference in effectiveness between fornix-based vs limbal-based trabeculectomy surgery, although with a high level of uncertainty owing to low event rates. In the fornix-based and limbal-based surgery, mean IOP at 12 months was similar, with ranges of 12.5-15.5 mm Hg and 11.7-15.1 mm Hg, respectively. Mean difference was 0.44 mm Hg (95% CI -0.45 to 1.33) and 0.86 mm Hg (95% CI -0.52 to 2.24) at 12 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. Mean number of postoperative glaucoma medications was similar between the 2 groups. Mean difference was 0.02 (95% CI -0.15 to 0.19) at 12 months. As far as postoperative complications, an increased risk of shallow anterior chamber was observed in the limbal-based group.

CONCLUSION

Similar efficacy of trabeculectomy surgery with respect to bleb failure or IOP control was observed in both types of conjunctival flap incisions. A significant difference was detected in the risk of postoperative shallow anterior chamber, which was increased in the limbal-based group.

Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is one of the leading largely preventable causes of blindness in the world. It usually is addressed first medically with topical intraocular pressure-lowering drops or by laser trabeculoplasty. In cases where such treatment fails, glaucoma-filtering surgery is considered, most commonly trabeculectomy surgery with variations in technique, for example, the type of conjunctival flap (fornix- or limbal-based). In a fornix-based flap, the surgical wound is performed at the corneal limbus; while in a limbal-based flap, the incision is further away. Many studies in the literature compare fornix- and limbal-based trabeculectomy with respect to outcomes and complications.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effectiveness of fornix- versus limbal-based conjunctival flaps in trabeculectomy for adult glaucoma, with a specific focus on intraocular pressure (IOP) control and complications (adverse effects).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2015, Issue 9), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to October 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2015), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to October 2015), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 23 October 2015.We reviewed the bibliographic references of identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in order to find trials not identified by the electronic searches. We contacted researchers and practitioners active in the field of glaucoma to identify other published and unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs comparing the benefits and complications of fornix- versus limbal-based trabeculectomy for glaucoma, irrespective of glaucoma type, publication status, and language. We excluded studies on children less than 18 years of age, since wound healing is different in this age group and the rate of bleb scarring postoperatively is high.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We contacted study authors for additional information.The primary outcome was the proportion of failed trabeculectomies at 24 months. Failure was defined as the need for repeat surgery or uncontrolled IOP (more than 22 mmHg), despite additional topical/systemic medications. Needling and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injections were allowed only during the first six months postoperatively; additional needling or 5-FU injections were considered as failure. Mean post-operative IOP at 12 and 24 months also was recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

The review included six trials with a total of 361 participants. Two studies were conducted in America and one each in Germany, Greece, India, and Saudi Arabia. The participants of four trials had open-angle glaucoma; one study included participants with primary open-angle or primary closed-angle glaucoma, and one study did not specify the type of glaucoma. Three studies used a combined procedure (phacotrabeculectomy). Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) was performed in four studies, and trabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was performed in only one study.None of the included trials reported trabeculectomy failure at 24 months. Only one trial reported the failure rate of trabeculectomy as a late complication. Failure was higher among participants randomised to the limbal-based surgery: 1/50 eyes failed trabeculectomy in the fornix group compared with 3/50 in the limbal group (risk ratio (RR) 0.33, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.04 to 3.10); therefore we are very uncertain as to the relative effect of the two procedures on failure rate.Four studies including 252 participants provided measures of mean IOP at 12 months. In the fornix-based surgeries, mean IOP ranged from 12.5 to 15.5 mmHg and similar results were noted in limbal-based surgeries with mean IOP ranging from 11.7 to 15.1 mmHg without significant difference. Mean difference was 0.44 mmHg (95% CI -0.45 to 1.33) and 0.86 mmHg, (95% CI -0.52 to 2.24) at 12 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. Neither of these pooled analyses showed a statistically significant difference in IOP between groups (moderate quality of evidence).One trial reported number of anti-glaucoma medications at 24 months of follow-up with no difference noted between surgical groups. However, three trials reported the mean number of anti-glaucoma medications at 12 months of follow-up without significant difference in the mean number of postoperative IOP-lowering medications between the two surgical techniques. Mean difference was 0.02, (95% CI -0.15 to 0.19) at 12 months of follow-up (high quality of evidence).Because of the small numbers of events and total participants, the risk of many reported adverse events were uncertain and those that were found to be statistically significant may have been due to chance.For risk of bias assessment: although all six trials were randomised selection bias was mostly unclear, with unclear random sequence generation in four of the six studies and unclear allocation concealment in five of the six studies. Attrition bias was encountered in only one trial which also suffered from reporting bias. All other trials had an unclear risk of reporting bias as there was no access to study protocols. All included trials were judged to have high risk of detection bias due to lack of masking of the outcomes. Trabeculectomy is quite a standard procedure and unlikely to induce bias due to surgeon 'performance', hence performance bias was not evaluated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The main result of this review was that there was uncertainty as to the difference between fornix- and limbal-based trabeculectomy surgeries due to the small number of events and confidence intervals that cross the null. This also applied to postoperative complications, but without any impact on long-term failure rate between the two surgical techniques.

Limbus- versus fornix-based trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma eyes with prior ocular surgery: the Collaborative Bleb-Related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study

We compared the surgical successes of limbus- and fornix-based trabeculectomies in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) eyes that had prior ocular surgery in the Collaborative Bleb-Related Infection Incidence and Treatment Study (CBIITS), Japan. From the 1,098 glaucoma eyes in 34 clinical centers in CBIITS, 195 OAG eyes that had undergone previous trabeculectomy and/or lens extraction were included. Limbus- or fornix-based trabeculectomy with mitomycin C were performed. Surgical failure (IOP ≥ 21, 18, or 15 mmHg for criterion A, B or C, respectively; <20% decrease from baseline; reoperation for glaucoma; or loss of light perception vision) was counted. There were 106 and 89 eyes treated with limbus- and fornix-based trabeculectomies, respectively. At 3 years, IOP (mean ± SD) was 12.5 ± 5.9 and 14.1 ± 6.4 mmHg and the cumulative probabilities of failure during 3 years were 30.2% and 50.5% for criterion A, 40.3% and 57.4% for criterion B, and 57.9% and 65.8% for criterion C in the limbus- and the fornix-based group, respectively. Fornix-based incisions were associated with surgical failure in Cox-proportional multivariable analysis for criterion A [relative risk (RR) = 1.96], and B [RR = 1.60]. Limbus-based trabeculectomy had a higher probability of success in OAG eyes with prior ocular surgery.

Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival flaps in trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in high-risk patients

PURPOSE

To compare the surgical outcomes of limbal-based and fornix-based trabeculectomy in eyes with a history of ocular incisional surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-six eyes underwent limbal-based trabeculectomy (group LB), and were condition matched with 26 eyes that received fornix-based trabeculectomy (group FB). Surgical failure was recorded retrospectively if the intraocular pressure value was either ≥21, ≥18, and ≥15 mmHg (conditions A, B, and C, respectively) or <4 mmHg or if the patient required additional glaucoma surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was used to assess surgical failure.

RESULTS

For condition A, the 2 year surgical success probabilities were 75.0% and 63.9% in groups FB and LB, respectively (P=0.124). The corresponding values were 55.0% and 61.7% (P=0.638) in condition B, and 55.0% and 57.0% (P=0.454) in condition C. The rates of bleb leakage, hypotony, choroidal detachment, and bleb-related infection were 11.5%, 26.9%, 50.0%, and 7.7% in group LB, respectively. The corresponding values in group FB were 30.8%, 23.1%, 46.2%, and 0.0%, which were not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in surgical outcomes were observed between limbal-based and fornix-based trabeculectomy for patients with a history of incisional ocular surgeries.

Fornix-based versus limbus-based conjunctival flap in trabeculectomy: a quantitative evaluation of the evidence

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of limbus-based (LBCF) compared with fornix-based conjunctival flaps (FBCF) for trabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with uncontrolled glaucoma.

Methods

A comprehensive literature meta-analysis was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology to identify controlled clinical trials comparing LBCF with FBCF in trabeculectomy. The efficacy measures were the weighted mean differences (WMDs) for intraocular pressure reduction (IOPR), the reduction in glaucoma medications, and the relative risks (RRs) for success rates. Tolerability estimates were measured by RR for adverse events. The pooled effects were calculated using the random effects model.

Results

Sixteen controlled clinical trials meeting the predefined criteria were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 1,825 eyes from 1,392 patients with medically uncontrolled glaucoma were included. The WMD of the IOPR from baseline was 1.12 (95% CI: −0.88 to 3.12) when comparing LBCF with FBCF. LBCF was associated with numerically greater but non-significant IOP lowering efficacy than FBCF (P = 0.270). LBCF was comparable with FBCF in the reduction of glaucoma medication, with a WMD of 0.15 (−0.05 to 0.36) at the follow-up endpoint (P = 0.141). The pooled RR comparing LBCF with FBCF were 1.08 (0.94, 1.23) for the complete success rate and 1.01 (0.92, 1.10) for the qualified success rate. Rates of adverse events did not differ significantly between LBCF and FBCF.

Conclusions

There is no significant difference in IOP lowering, number of glaucoma medications, or proportion of patients who reached the IOP target between LBCF and FBCF trabeculectomy. Both incision techniques may contribute equally to adverse events.

Comparison of limbus-based and fornix-based trabeculectomy: success, bleb-related complications, and bleb morphology

PURPOSE

To compare the success and complications of trabeculectomy performed with limbus-based and fornix-based conjunctival approaches.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series with some prospective data collection.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients undergoing trabeculectomy by 2 surgeons between May 2000 and October 2008.

INTERVENTION

We performed limbus-based operations during the first 4 years and fornix-based operations during the last 4 years. We collected data by chart review and by examination at the most recent visit. For each follow-up visit, we defined success as undergoing no further glaucoma procedure and achieving one of our intraocular pressure (IOP) criteria. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards models, and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis. During 2009, 439 trabeculectomy sites of 347 patients were quantitatively assessed by the Indiana bleb grading system.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Success rate of trabeculectomy, as determined by the achievement of each of our different IOP goals, with or without IOP-lowering medications; and (2) incidence of surgical complications.

RESULTS

During the 4 years after surgery, the success rates of limbus-based and fornix-based trabeculectomy were not statistically different for any of our IOP criteria. Blebs after limbus-based surgery were more likely to be graded as higher and to be avascular (GEE model, both P < 0.0001). Four percent of eyes experienced late-onset bleb leaks within 4 years after both limbus- and fornix-based operations; however, limbus-based cases developed bleb leaks significantly later than did fornix-based cases (2.1 vs. 1.0 years; P=0.002, GEE model). Late bleb-associated infection during the first 4 years after surgery occurred more often in limbus-based operations, although statistical significance was borderline (P=0.054, Cox model). Symptomatic hypotony during all available follow-up was more common with fornix-based operations (P=0.01, GEE model). Eyes undergoing the fornix-based operation had a greater risk of cataract surgery in the 4-year period after surgery (P=0.02, Cox model), and fornix-based cases requiring cataract surgery had the operation earlier than limbus-based cases (P=0.002, GEE model).

CONCLUSIONS

Success rates are similar between limbus-based and fornix-based trabeculectomy. Limbus-based procedures produce higher, more avascular blebs, with a greater risk of infection. Fornix-based procedures have more symptomatic hypotony and more and earlier cataract development.

The moorfields safer surgery system

This review presents the 'Moorfields Safer Surgery System', which is designed to improve the consistency and outcomes of trabeculectomy surgery. Evidence-based recommendations are made for each step of the surgery. This system requires a minimum of equipment and can be easily implemented by most surgeons. The system is ultimately designed to preserve the vision in our patients by minimising complications while maintaining a desired intraocular pressure.

Comparison of the outcomes of limbal-based trabeculectomy with and without anchor sutures

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of limbal-based trabeculectomy with anchor sutures compared to standard limbal-based trabeculectomy. Limbal-based trabeculectomy was performed with a new technique using anchor sutures, which involved tying the conjunctiva to the sclera at a deep fornix incision to prevent bleb localization induced by slippage of the conjunctival suture scar toward the scleral flap.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, comparative, interventional case series, 45 eyes that underwent limbal-based trabeculectomy with anchor sutures and 27 eyes that underwent standard limbal-based trabeculectomy were analyzed (primary surgery).

RESULTS

At a target intraocular pressure of 15 mm Hg, the 3-year survival rate using Kaplan-Meier analysis was 76.2% in the limbal-based trabeculectomy with anchor sutures group and 55.6% in the standard limbal-based trabeculectomy group. Bleb morphology analysis using the Moorfields Bleb Grading System showed that blebs in the limbal-based trabeculectomy with anchor sutures group were more diffused than those in the standard limbal-based trabeculectomy group.

CONCLUSION

Limbal-based trabeculectomy with anchor sutures appears to be an effective method for decreasing intraocular pressure and improving morphology of blebs.

Beneficial effects of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab on trabeculectomy outcomes in neovascular glaucoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) on outcomes in trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma (NVG).

METHODS

Charts for 52 NVG eyes of 52 consecutive patients who received primary trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC) were reviewed. Postoperative follow-up periods for all patients were > or = 4 months. Thirty-two consecutive eyes were treated without IVB (control group) and 20 consecutive eyes received IVB (1.25 mg) 10 +/- 11 days before trabeculectomy (IVB group). The main outcome measures were postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and incidence of postoperative complications. Surgical success was defined as IOP< 21 mmHg with or without medication (qualified or complete success, respectively). Failure was defined as IOP exceeding these criteria, phthisis bulbi, loss of light perception or additional glaucoma surgeries. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test was performed to compare surgical success rates between the two groups.

RESULTS

Complete and qualified success rates at 6 months were 95% versus 50% and 95% versus 75% in the IVB and control groups, respectively. The IVB group achieved significantly better surgical success rates than the control group (complete success, p < 0.001; qualified success, p = 0.026). Postoperative hyphaema on day 1 or hyphaema with a duration of > 1 week occurred significantly less frequently in the IVB group than in the control group (p = 0.009, p = 0.014, respectively). The incidence of serious complications such as endophthalmitis, phthisis bulbi and a marked decrease in visual acuity did not increase in the IVB group.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study showed that preoperative IVB decreased postoperative hyphaema and increased surgical success rates, and thus may be an effective adjunct to trabeculectomy in NVG.

Moving the goal posts definitions of success after glaucoma surgery and their effect on reported outcome

PURPOSE

To determine (1) the extent to which the definition of success of glaucoma surgery varies in the literature and (2) the degree to which the reported outcome after trabeculectomy is affected by the criteria used to define success.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature and application of definitions to a retrospective cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 100 patients who previously underwent trabeculectomy.

METHODS

A literature search was performed of PubMed using the search term trabeculectomy for a 5-year period. Studies presenting original data relating to longitudinal intraocular pressure (IOP) control after glaucoma surgery were included. The definitions of success and failure used were documented for each publication. Each IOP-related definition of success was applied to a cohort of patients who previously underwent trabeculectomy. Success rates were derived for each published definition up to 36 months after surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraocular pressure measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry.

RESULTS

From 100 publications meeting the inclusion criteria, 92 distinct IOP-related definitions of success were identified. Using these definitions, success rates for this series of 100 trabeculectomies varied between 36.0% and 98.0% after 3 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Over a recent 5-year period, there were nearly as many different definitions of success after glaucoma surgery as publications on the subject. The definition used markedly affects the quoted success rate after trabeculectomy, making interpretation of and comparison between published results extremely difficult. Standardization of published outcome parameters after glaucoma surgery is essential to allow meaningful comparisons between different study reports.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

The medical and surgical treatment of glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Ongoing demographic changes in Europe are heightening the importance of adequate treatment for glaucoma, a disorder that is markedly more common in the elderly.

METHOD

A selective search for relevant literature, including Cochrane Reviews and the guidelines of the European Glaucoma Society, regarding the topical and surgical treatment of glaucoma.

RESULTS

It is recommended that the intraocular pressure (IOP) should be lowered by 20% to 50% from its baseline value, depending on the extent of already existing damage, the rate of progression, the baseline IOP, and the age of the patient. Topical monotherapy can lower the IOP by 15% to 30%. The success rate of filtration surgery has risen because of the intraoperative application of topical antimetabolites and currently ranges from 50% to 90%, depending on the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The goal of glaucoma treatment is to protect the patient from blindness and visual impairment while keeping the treatment-related decline in quality of life to a minimum. Any type of glaucoma treatment, be it medical or surgical, must further this aim in consideration of the situation of the individual patient.

Frequency of bleb manipulations after trabeculectomy surgery

AIM

To quantify the type and frequency of postoperative bleb manipulations undertaken after modern glaucoma surgery.

METHODS

Bleb manipulations were recorded after trabeculectomy surgery on 119 consecutive patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. The type of intervention and time after surgery were recorded. Statistical analysis identified success rates at various intraocular pressure (IOP) cut-off definitions and identified factors that increased the risk for bleb manipulation.

RESULTS

In all, 78.2% of trabeculectomies were followed by some form of bleb manipulation. Almost 49% of blebs underwent massage and a similar number required at least one suture removal, 31.1% required at least one 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) injection and 25.2% required at least one needling and 5-FU injection. The median time to the first intervention for massage, suture removal, 5-FU injection, and needling and 5-FU injection were 1, 14, 14 and 43 days, respectively. IOP measurements were higher at all follow-up time points in the intervention group. Failure to achieve specific IOP target pressures was also generally poorer in the 5-FU, and needling and 5-FU intervention groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative intervention is a frequent occurrence after modern glaucoma surgery. This requires intensive postoperative follow-up and is a labour-intensive undertaking. Despite interventions in our group of patients, IOP in the intervention group was always higher than in the group that required no intervention.

Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in pseudophakic patients with open-angle glaucoma: outcomes and risk factors for failure

PURPOSE

To evaluate tonometric outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in pseudophakic patients with open-angle glaucoma and associated risk factors for failure.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Seventy-three pseudophakic patients (89 eyes) with primary open-angle, normal-tension, exfoliative, or pigmentary glaucoma were recruited. Success rates were defined according to three criteria: (A) intraocular pressure (IOP) < or = 18 mm Hg and IOP reduction > or = 20%; (B) IOP < or = 15 mm Hg and IOP reduction > or = 25%; and (C) IOP < or = 12 mm Hg and IOP reduction > or = 30%. IOP, visual acuity, complications, and additional interventions were documented after surgery. Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for failure.

RESULTS

Mean IOP (+/-SD) decreased from a preoperative value of 18.8 +/- 6.6 mm Hg to 10.2 +/- 5.1 mm Hg at one year and to 10.0 +/- 4.2 at two years (P < .001 for both). Average number of preoperative medications decreased from 3.0 +/- 1.1 to 0.5 +/- 1.0 at one year and to 0.5 +/- 0.9 at two years (P < .001 for both). For criteria A, B, and C, success rates (+/-SE) were 87% +/- 4%, 83% +/- 5%, and 76% +/- 5% at 1 year and 67% +/- 4%, 58% +/- 8%, and 50% +/- 7 at two years. Laser suture lysis was performed in 30 eyes, and 11% of those required a second glaucoma procedure.

CONCLUSION

Increasing age, use of a limbus-based conjunctival flap, and performance of laser suture lysis were factors that were associated with a smaller risk of failure. Present findings indicate that trabeculectomy with mitomycin C provides acceptable long-term success rates in pseudophakic patients, with a low incidence of complications.