AT(1)-receptor blockers: differences that matter

Angiotensin-(1-7) mediated calcium signalling by MAS

The G protein-coupled receptor, MAS, is the receptor of the endogenous ligand, Angiotensin (Ang)-(1-7). It is a promising drug target since the Ang-(1-7)/MAS axis is protective in the cardiovascular system. Therefore, a characterization of MAS signalling is important for developing novel therapeutics for cardiovascular diseases. In this paper, we show that Ang-(1-7) increases intracellular calcium in transiently MAS-transfected HEK293 cells. The calcium influx induced by the activation of MAS is dependent on plasma membrane Ca²⁺ channels, phospholipase C, and protein kinase C. Specifically, we could demonstrate that MAS employs non-selective, transient receptor potential channels (TRPs) for calcium entry.

Losartan impairs HTR-8/SVneo trophoblast migration through inhibition of angiotensin II-induced pro-inflammatory profile in human endometrial stromal cells

A deep interaction between the endometrium and the invading trophoblast occurs during implantation in humans, with the acquisition of uterine receptivity to the invading embryo promoted by an elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the endometrium, and the invasiveness of decidualizing endometrial stromal cells, augmented by trophoblast-derived signals. Considering that usage of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers, among other renin-angiotensin system (RAS) antagonists, is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, here we aim to analyse the involvement of AT1 receptor in the reciprocal dialogue occurring between endometrial stroma and trophoblast cells. In human endometrial stromal cells (T-HESC) pre-incubated with a decidualization cocktail, angiotensin (Ang) II increased protein expression of prolactin and FOXO1, markers of endometrial decidualization, while promoting nuclear translocation of FOXO1. In addition, Ang II treatment increased CXCL8, and matrix metalloprotease (MMP)-2 levels in T-HESC. Incubation with the AT1 receptor blocker losartan or with an NFAT signalling inhibitor, decreased Ang II-induced secretion of prolactin, CXCL8, and MMP-2 in T-HESC. In a wound healing assay, conditioned medium (CM) obtained from Ang II-treated T-HESC, but not CM from losartan-pre-incubated T-HESC, increased migration of HTR-8/SVneo trophoblasts, effect that was inhibited in the presence of a CXCL8-neutralizing antibody. An increased secretion of CXCL8 and MMP-2 was observed after treatment of T-HESC with CM obtained from HTR-8/SVneo cells, which was not observed in T-HESC pre-incubated with losartan or with the NFAT inhibitor. This study evidenced a reciprocal RAS-coded messaging between trophoblast and ESC which is affected by the AT1 receptor blocker losartan.

Modulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Homeostasis as a Pleiotropic Effect of Commonly Used Drugs

Age-associated diseases represent a growing burden for global health systems in our aging society. Consequently, we urgently need innovative strategies to counteract these pathological disturbances. Overwhelming generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is associated with age-related damage, leading to cellular dysfunction and, ultimately, diseases. However, low-dose ROS act as crucial signaling molecules and inducers of a vaccination-like response to boost antioxidant defense mechanisms, known as mitohormesis. Consequently, modulation of ROS homeostasis by nutrition, exercise, or pharmacological interventions is critical in aging. Numerous nutrients and approved drugs exhibit pleiotropic effects on ROS homeostasis. In the current review, we provide an overview of drugs affecting ROS generation and ROS detoxification and evaluate the potential of these effects to counteract the development and progression of age-related diseases. In case of inflammation-related dysfunctions, cardiovascular- and neurodegenerative diseases, it might be essential to strengthen antioxidant defense mechanisms in advance by low ROS level rises to boost the individual ROS defense mechanisms. In contrast, induction of overwhelming ROS production might be helpful to fight pathogens and kill cancer cells. While we outline the potential of ROS manipulation to counteract age-related dysfunction and diseases, we also raise the question about the proper intervention time and dosage.

Candesartan Effectively Preserves Cognition in Senescence Accelerated Mouse Prone 8 (SAMP8) mice

Background:

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has become a worldwide crisis with no effective therapeutic options. The medications currently available for AD are only palliative; their effect is temporary, and they are associated with unfavorable side effects. Even the newest medication aducanumab, granted accelerated FDA approval in 2021, failed to show cognitive benefits in clinical trials and continued approval requires verification in subsequent clinical trials. There is an urgent need for safe and effective therapies to preserve cognition and effectively manage AD. Generally, a new drug product takes several years for FDA approval and exceeds 2.5 billion dollars in research and development, with most new drug products never even reaching the market. This has led to a recent shift for repurposing/repositioning existing FDA-approved medications, to new therapeutic indications.

Objective:

To investigate the effects of long-term treatment with candesartan, an FDA-approved angiotensin-II type-1 receptor blocker (ARB), on the development of cognitive impairment associated with premature aging.

Methods:

Candesartan was given at a dose of 1 mg/kg/d in an AD model of senescence-accelerated mouse prone-8 (SAMP8) and senescence-accelerated mouse resistant (SAMR1) mice. Oral treatment with candesartan or vehicle was started, in 2-month-old mice and administered continuously for 4-months.

Results:

Low-dose candesartan prevented the development of cognitive impairment, otherwise associated with accelerated aging, in SAMP8 mice, by reducing inflammation and nitro-oxidative stress. Candesartan did not affect the cognitive function of control SAMR1 mice.

Conclusion:

Early ARB treatment might be beneficial in preventing age-related cognitive deficits in AD-prone individuals.

The Effects of Angiotensin II or Angiotensin 1-7 on Rat Pial Microcirculation during Hypoperfusion and Reperfusion Injury: Role of Redox Stress

Renin-angiotensin systems produce angiotensin II (Ang II) and angiotensin 1-7 (Ang 1-7), which are able to induce opposite effects on circulation. This study in vivo assessed the effects induced by Ang II or Ang 1-7 on rat pial microcirculation during hypoperfusion-reperfusion, clarifying the mechanisms causing the imbalance between Ang II and Ang 1-7. The fluorescence microscopy was used to quantify the microvascular parameters. Hypoperfusion and reperfusion caused vasoconstriction, disruption of blood-brain barrier, reduction of capillary perfusion and an increase in reactive oxygen species production. Rats treated with Ang II showed exacerbated microvascular damage with stronger vasoconstriction compared to hypoperfused rats, a further increase in leakage, higher decrease in capillary perfusion and marker oxidative stress. Candesartan cilexetil (specific Ang II type 1 receptor (AT₁R) antagonist) administration prior to Ang II prevented the effects induced by Ang II, blunting the hypoperfusion-reperfusion injury. Ang 1-7 or ACE2 activator administration, preserved the pial microcirculation from hypoperfusion-reperfusion damage. These effects of Ang 1-7 were blunted by a Mas (Mas oncogene-encoded protein) receptor antagonist, while Ang II type 2 receptor antagonists did not affect Ang 1-7-induced changes. In conclusion, Ang II and Ang 1-7 triggered different mechanisms through AT₁R or MAS receptors able to affect cerebral microvascular injury.

Angiotensin II mediates the axonal trafficking of tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine β-hydroxylase mRNAs and enhances norepinephrine synthesis in primary sympathetic neurons

In the sympatho-adrenal system, angiotensin II (Ang II) acts as a key neuromodulatory component. At sympathetic nerve terminals, Ang II influences sympathetic transmission by enhancing norepinephrine (NE) synthesis, facilitating NE release and inhibiting NE uptake. Previously, it was demonstrated that tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) mRNA is trafficked to the distal axons of primary superior cervical ganglia (SCG) neurons, directed by a cis-acting regulatory element (i.e. zipcode) located in the 3'UTR of the transcript. Results of metabolic labeling studies established that the mRNA is locally translated. It was further shown that the axonal trafficking of the mRNA encoding the enzyme plays an important role in mediating dopamine (DA) and NE synthesis and may facilitate the maintenance of axonal catecholamine levels. In the present study, the hypothesis was tested that Ang II induces NE synthesis in rat primary SCG neurons via the modulation of the trafficking of the mRNAs encoding the catecholamine synthesizing enzymes TH and dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH). Treatment of SCG neurons with the Ang II receptor type 1 (AT1R) agonist, L-162,313, increases the axonal levels of TH and DBH mRNA and protein and results in elevated NE levels. Conversely, treatment of rat SCG neurons with the AT1R antagonist, Eprosartan, abolished the L-162,313-mediated increase in axonal levels of TH and DBH mRNA and protein. In a first attempt to identify the proteins involved in the Ang II-mediated axonal transport of TH mRNA, we used a biotinylated 50-nucleotide TH RNA zipcode as bait in the affinity purification of TH zipcode-associated proteins. Mass spectrometric analysis of the TH zipcode ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex immune-purified from SCG neurons led to the identification of 163 somal and 127 axonal proteins functionally involved in binding nucleic acids, the translational machinery or acting as subunits of cytoskeletal and motor proteins. Surprisingly, immune-purification of the TH axonal trafficking complex, results in the acquisition of DBH mRNA, suggesting that these mRNAs maybe transported to the axon together, possibly in the same RNP complex. Taken together, our results point to a novel mechanism by which Ang II participates in the regulation of axonal synthesis of NE by modulating the local trafficking and expression of TH and DBH, two key enzymes involved in the catecholamine biosynthetic pathway.

An insurmountable NPY Y5 receptor antagonist exhibits superior anti-obesity effects in high-fat diet-induced obese mice

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) Y5 receptor plays a key role in the effects of NPY, an important neurotransmitter in the control of energy homeostasis including stimulation of food intake and inhibition of energy expenditure. The NPY-Y5 receptor system has been an attractive drug target for potential use in treating obesity. Here we report the discovery and characterization of two novel Y5 receptor antagonists, S-2367 and S-234462. Both compounds displayed high affinity for the Y5 receptor in the radio-ligand binding assay, while in the cell-based functional assay, S-2367 and S-234462 showed, respectively, surmountable and insurmountable antagonism. In cell-based washout experiments, S-234462 dissociated from the Y5 receptor more slowly than S-2367. In vivo study showed that S-234462 effectively suppressed food intake induced by acute central injection of a selective Y5 receptor agonist. Furthermore, high-fat diet-induced obese (DIO) mice treated with S-234462 for 5 weeks showed a significant decrease in body weight gain and food intake compared to those treated with S-2367. In conclusion, S-234462 exhibits insurmountable antagonism of NPY Y5 receptor in vitro and superior anti-obesity effects to the surmountable NPY Y5 antagonist S-2367 in DIO mice.

Comparative assessment of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: surmountable vs. insurmountable antagonist

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms of antagonism vary between the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs): insurmountable antagonism and surmountable antagonism. Recent retrospective observational studies suggest that ARBs may not have equivalent benefits in various clinical situations. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of two categories of ARBs on the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

We analyzed the large-scale, prospective, observational Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry study, which enrolled 2740 AMI patients. They divided by the prescription of surmountable ARBs or insurmountable ARBs at discharge. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, nonfatal MI, and re-percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

RESULTS

In the overall population, the MACEs rate in 1 year was significantly higher in the surmountable ARB group (14.3% vs. 11.2%, p=0.025), which was mainly due to increased cardiac death (3.3% vs. 1.9%, p=0.031). Matching by propensity-score showed consistent results (MACEs rate: 14.9% vs. 11.4%, p=0.037). In subgroup analysis, the insurmountable ARB treatment significantly reduced the incidence of MACEs in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40%, with a low killip class, with ST segment elevation MI, and with normal renal function.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, insurmountable ARBs were more effective on long-term clinical outcomes than surmountable ARBs in patients with AMI.

Angiotensin-II receptor 1 antagonist fetopathy--risk assessment, critical time period and vena cava thrombosis as a possible new feature

AIMS

Angiotensin-II receptor 1 antagonists (AT₁-antagonists) may cause severe and even lethal fetopathy in late pregnancy. However, exposure still occurs in spite of warnings in package leaflets. This study aimed to assess the risk of fetopathy, the sensitive time window, and possible new symptoms in prospective as well as retrospective cases with AT₁-antagonist treatment during the second or third trimester of pregnancy.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled by the Berlin Institute for Clinical Teratology and Drug Risk Assessment in Pregnancy between 1999 and 2011 through risk consultation. Symptoms defined as indicative of AT₁-antagonist fetopathy were: oligo-/anhydramnios, renal insufficiency, lung hypoplasia, joint contractures, skull hypoplasia and fetal/neonatal death.

RESULTS

In 5/29 (17%) prospectively enrolled cases with AT₁-antagonist exposure beyond the first trimester oligo-/anhydramnios was diagnosed. Two infants showed additional symptoms of fetopathy. The risk is more than 30% if treatment continues beyond the 20th week of pregnancy. Oligo-/anhydramnios was reversible after AT₁-antagonist withdrawal. Among 16 retrospective case reports, three infants presented with a thrombosis of the inferior vena cava in the vicinity of the renal veins. Four out of 13 live births did not survive.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey suggests that the risk increases with duration of AT₁-antagonist treatment into late pregnancy and oligo-/anhydramnios may be reversible after AT₁-antagonist discontinuation. Thrombosis of inferior vena cava may be a new feature of AT₁-antagonist fetopathy. AT₁-antagonist medication during pregnancy constitutes a considerable risk and must be discontinued immediately. In case of indicative diagnostic findings in either the fetus or newborn, previous maternal AT₁-antagonist exposure should be considered.

Slow receptor dissociation kinetics differentiate macitentan from other endothelin receptor antagonists in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells

Two endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), bosentan and ambrisentan, are currently approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a devastating disease involving an activated endothelin system and aberrant contraction and proliferation of pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMC). The novel ERA macitentan has recently concluded testing in a Phase III morbidity/mortality clinical trial in PAH patients. Since the association and dissociation rates of G protein-coupled receptor antagonists can influence their pharmacological activity in vivo, we used human PASMC to characterize inhibitory potency and receptor inhibition kinetics of macitentan, ambrisentan and bosentan using calcium release and inositol-1-phosphate (IP₁) assays. In calcium release assays macitentan, ambrisentan and bosentan were highly potent ERAs with K_b values of 0.14 nM, 0.12 nM and 1.1 nM, respectively. Macitentan, but not ambrisentan and bosentan, displayed slow apparent receptor association kinetics as evidenced by increased antagonistic potency upon prolongation of antagonist pre-incubation times. In compound washout experiments, macitentan displayed a significantly lower receptor dissociation rate and longer receptor occupancy half-life (ROt_1/2) compared to bosentan and ambrisentan (ROt_1/2∶17 minutes versus 70 seconds and 40 seconds, respectively). Because of its lower dissociation rate macitentan behaved as an insurmountable antagonist in calcium release and IP₁ assays, and unlike bosentan and ambrisentan it blocked endothelin receptor activation across a wide range of endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentrations. However, prolongation of the ET-1 stimulation time beyond ROt_1/2 rendered macitentan a surmountable antagonist, revealing its competitive binding mode. Bosentan and ambrisentan behaved as surmountable antagonists irrespective of the assay duration and they lacked inhibitory activity at high ET-1 concentrations. Thus, macitentan is a competitive ERA with significantly slower receptor dissociation kinetics than the currently approved ERAs. Slow dissociation caused insurmountable antagonism in functional PASMC-based assays and this could contribute to an enhanced pharmacological activity of macitentan in ET-1-dependent pathologies.

Olmesartan for the treatment of arterial hypertension

Angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) are an important class of agents used for the treatment of arterial hypertension. Olmesartan medoxomil, the seventh latest ARB approved by the US FDA, is an oral, once-daily, AT(1)-receptor selective ARB with high receptor affinity. Pharmacologically, it acts as a competitive and insurmountable Ang II antagonist with linear pharmacokinetics and without cytochrome P450 interaction. The drug is licensed for the treatment of arterial hypertension alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Olmesartan has demonstrated its dose-dependent inhibitory effect on Ang I-induced blood pressure responses between 10 and 80 mg in Phase II studies. These results, confirmed in an international clinical trial programme covering over 3000 hypertensive patients in numerous studies, demonstrated rapid blood pressure-lowering effects within 1 week. A daily oral dose of 20 mg olmesartan is considered to be the optimal dose. In clinical trials and postmarketing studies, olmesartan has been shown to be safe and well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to the placebo. Active comparative studies demonstrated either similar or superior efficacy of olmesartan compared with other ARBs, angiotensin-converting enzymes inhibitors, beta-blockers or calcium-channel blockers. Besides its antihypertensive efficacy, olmesartan was shown in clinical trials to reduce vascular microinflammation, decrease intrarenal vascular resistance, significantly reduce vascular remodeling of small resistance arteries and exert antiatherosclerotic effects by significantly reducing the volume of large atherosclerotic plaques.

Candesartan: widening indications for this angiotensin II receptor blocker?

Candesartan cilexetil is one of a number of drugs of the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) class. Their principal mode of action involves competitive blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor, thereby modulating the activity of the rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy has been proven to be well tolerated and effective in the management of hypertension, chronic heart failure with left ventricular dysfunction and the prevention and progression of diabetic renal disease. Candesartan is a highly potent, long-acting and selective angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker. It was launched in 1998 for the treatment of hypertension. Its use has increased dramatically, with recently published data suggesting benefit in the treatment of stroke, heart failure, diabetic renal disease and most recently in preventing the development of or delaying the progression of diabetic retinopathy. In this article we review the literature on the use of ARB drugs in general before focusing on candesartan.

Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of olmesartan relative to other angiotensin II receptor antagonists: an overview of randomized controlled studies

The aim of the present work was to review published studies investigating the dose-related efficacy on blood pressure (BP) of olmesartan and of other commercially available angiotensin II type I receptor blockers (ARBs). Patient population comprises mild to moderate hypertensive adult patients. We selected studies with comparable design and dose ranges. Dose-effect relationship plots were fitted for diastolic (DBP) and systolic (SBP) BP to the simplified E(max) model. We also examined controlled studies of olmesartan vs. other individual ARBs. Our overview was based on 7280 patients, of which 5769 received an ARB and 1511 received placebo. Except for losartan, the data fitted correctly to the E(max) model, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.99. BP-lowering efficacy defined as E(max) was superior with olmesartan, (DBP/SBP mmHg: -9.0/-12.4) when compared with candesartan (-6.7/-11.3), irbesartan (-6.5/-11.2) and valsartan (-6.3/-8.9). Head-to-head comparisons of olmesartan to each of the other ARBs used at per-label 'recommended doses', support the finding of a greater BP-lowering effect of olmesartan. This overview suggests that clinically relevant differences in maximal efficacy, as well as in efficacy of per-label recommended doses can be evidenced among individual ARBs. Olmesartan efficacy was consistently at the highest end of the range of efficacy of ARBs studied.

Metabolic effects of telmisartan and irbesartan in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome treated with rosiglitazone

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin II receptor blockers represent a class of effective and well-tolerated orally active antihypertensive drugs in the general hypertensive population and in diabetic patients. The aim of our study was to investigate the metabolic effects of telmisartan and irbesartan in diabetic subjects treated with rosiglitazone.

METHODS

We evaluated 188 type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome. All patients took a fixed dose of 4 mg rosiglitazone/day. We administered 40 mg telmisartan/day or 150 mg irbesartan/day and evaluated their body mass index, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment-index (Homa-IR), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, adiponectin and resistin during 12 months of this treatment.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In addition to a comparable antihypertensive effect for telmisartan and irbesartan after 6 and 12 months, both treatments were associated with a significant reduction in TC and LDL-C plasma levels compared with baseline. After 6 months of treatment, only the telmisartan group experienced a significant improvement in (HbA(1c)), FPG, Homa-IR, adiponectin and resistin compared with the baseline values, whereas both drug regimens were associated with a significant improvement in these parameters after 12 months. However, the improvements observed in the telmisartan group were significantly larger than that noted in the irbesartan group after 12 months of treatment. FPI significantly decreased only after 12 months of treatment in both groups, but again, the reduction was significantly larger in the telmisartan-treated subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan seemed to improve glycaemic and lipid control and metabolic parameters of the metabolic syndrome better than irbesartan. These differences could be relevant in the choice of therapy for this condition and diabetes.

Manipulation of small-molecule inhibitory kinetics modulates MCH-R1 function

The capacity of novel benzopyridazinone-based antagonists to inhibit MCH-R1 function, relative to their affinity for the receptor, has been investigated. Three compounds that differ by the addition of either a chlorine atom, or trifluoromethyl group, have nearly identical receptor affinities; however their abilities to inhibit receptor elicited signaling events, measured as a function of time, are dramatically altered. Both the chlorinated and trifluoromethyl modified compounds have a very slow on-rate to maximal functional inhibition relative to the unmodified base compound. A similar impact on inhibitory capacity can be achieved by modifying the side-chain composition at position 2.53 of the receptor; replacement of the native phenylalanine with alanine significantly reduces the amount of time required by the chlorinated compound to attain maximal functional inhibition. The primary attribute responsible for this alteration in inhibitory capacity appears to be the overall bulk of the amino acid at this position-substitution of the similarly sized amino acids leucine and tyrosine results in phenotypes that are indistinguishable from the wild type receptor. Finally, the impact of these differential inhibitory kinetics has been examined in cultured rat neurons by measuring the ability of the compounds to reverse MCH mediated inhibition of calcium currents. As observed using the cell expression models, the chlorinated compound has a diminished capacity to interfere with receptor function. Collectively, these data suggest that differential inhibitory on rates between a small-molecule antagonist and its target receptor can impact the ability of the compound to modify the biological response(s) elicited by the receptor.

Kinetics of nonpeptide antagonist binding to the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor: Implications for structure–activity relationships and insurmountable antagonism

Numerous nonpeptide ligands have been developed for the human gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor as potential agents for treatment of disorders of the reproductive-endocrine axis. While the equilibrium binding of these ligands has been studied in detail, little is known of the kinetics of their receptor interaction. In this study we evaluated the kinetic structure-activity relationships (SAR) of uracil-series antagonists by measuring their association and dissociation rate constants. These constants were measured directly using a novel radioligand, [3H] NBI 42902, and indirectly for unlabeled ligands. Receptor association and dissociation of [3H] NBI 42902 was monophasic, with an association rate constant of 93+/-10 microM(-1) min(-1) and a dissociation rate constant of 0.16+/-0.02 h(-1) (t(1/2) of 4.3 h). Four unlabeled compounds were tested with varying substituents at the 2-position of the benzyl group at position 1 of the uracil (-F, -SO(CH3), -SO2(CH3) and -CF3). The nature of the substituent did not appreciably affect the association rate constant but varied the dissociation rate constant >50-fold (t(1/2) ranging from 52 min for -SO(CH3) to >43 h for -CF3). This SAR was poorly resolved in standard competition assays due to lack of equilibration. The functional consequences of the varying dissociation rate were investigated by measuring antagonism of GnRH-stimulated [3H] inositol phosphates accumulation. Slowly dissociating ligands displayed insurmountable antagonism (decrease of the GnRH E(max)) while antagonism by more rapidly dissociating ligands was surmountable (without effect on the GnRH E(max)). Therefore, evaluating the receptor binding kinetics of nonpeptide antagonists revealed SAR, not evident in standard competition assays, that defined at least in part the mode of functional antagonism by the ligands. These findings are of importance for the future definition of nonpeptide ligand SAR and for the identification of potentially useful slowly dissociating antagonists for the GnRH receptor.

A placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil, 8 mg, and losartan, 50 mg, as monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension, using 36-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

This double-blind, randomised, controlled study compared the efficacy of candesartan cilexetil 8 mg (n = 87) and losartan 50 mg (n = 89), once daily for 6 weeks, relative to placebo (n = 80) in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure (DBP): 95-115 mmHg). Ambulatory BP measurements were done every 15 min over 36 h. At the end of the 6-week treatment, the mean change in DBP between the baseline and the 0-24-h period after the last dose of study medication was greater in patients receiving candesartan cilexetil 8 mg (-7.3 mmHg +/- 6.9 mmHg) compared with losartan 50 mg (-5.1 mmHg +/- 4.9 mmHg) (p < 0.05) or placebo (0.3 mmHg +/- 6.5 mmHg) (p < 0.001). The mean change in systolic BP (SBP) during this time was greater in patients receiving candesartan cilexetil 8 mg (-10.8 mmHg +/- 11.3 mmHg), or losartan 50 mg (-8.8 mmHg +/- 8.9 mmHg) than placebo (1.2 mmHg +/- 9.9 mmHg) (p < 0.001). Candesartan cilexetil 8 mg was associated with a greater reduction in DBP and SBP, relative to placebo, when compared with losartan 50 mg, during both daytime and night-time, and between 12 and 24 h after dosing (p < 0.001). Both active treatments were well tolerated. In patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, candesartan cilexetil 8 mg therefore had greater, more consistent antihypertensive efficacy throughout the day and the night, and long-lasting efficacy after the last dose, compared with losartan 50 mg. This greater efficacy is maintained with an excellent tolerability associated with members of the angiotensin Il type 1-receptor blocker class.

The Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) – recent analyses

Principal results of the Study on COgnition and Prognosis in the Elderly (SCOPE) were published in 2003. Blood pressure reduction was pronounced in both the candesartan and control groups, with little difference. With candesartan-based treatment, compared with control, the relative risk of non-fatal stroke was 0.72 (P = 0.04) and of major cardiovascular events 0.89 (P = 0.19). There were no significant differences in cognitive outcomes. We have reviewed recent subgroup analyses in SCOPE. Cardiovascular endpoints were analysed in patients who did not receive add-on treatment after random allocation to groups (post hoc) and in patients with certain characteristics at baseline, such as age, sex, diabetes, isolated systolic hypertension, or a history of stroke. Cognitive endpoints were analysed in patients with baseline Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score 24-28, and in those examined with more extensive investigations than the MMSE. In patients without add-on treatment, there were significant risk reductions in the candesartan group in major cardiovascular events [relative risk (RR) 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51 to 0.92] and mortality (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95). In other subgroups, the relative risks for major cardiovascular events and stroke were generally consistent with those in the entire study population. However, risk reductions in the candesartan group were particularly marked in patients with a history of stroke. In patients with MMSE score 24-28 at baseline, the score declined significantly less in the candesartan group (between-group difference 0.49, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.97). Cardiovascular outcome benefit of candesartan-based treatment was most evident in patients without add-on treatment and in those with a history of stroke. Results in other subgroups were generally consistent with those in the entire SCOPE study population. In patients with slightly low cognitive function at baseline, the MMSE score declined less in the candesartan group.

Telmisartan and Irbesartan Therapy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated with Rosiglitazone: Effects on Insulin-Resistance, Leptin and Tumor Necrosis Factor-.ALPHA

The aim of our study was to investigate the metabolic effect of telmisartan and irbesartan in subjects treated with rosiglitazone, a well-known insulin-sensitizing drug, in order to clarify the direct metabolic effects of the two former drugs. Patients were enrolled, evaluated, and followed at 3 Italian centers. We evaluated 188 type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome (94 males and 94 females in total; 49 males and 46 females, aged 56+/-5, treated with telmisartan; and 45 males and 48 females, aged 55+/-4, treated with irbesartan). All had been diabetic for at least 6 months, and glycemic control by the maximum tolerated dietary changes and maximum tolerated dose of oral hypoglycemic agents had been attempted and failed in all cases. All patients took a fixed dose of rosiglitazone, 4 mg/day. We administered telmisartan (40 mg/day) or irbesartan (150 mg/day) in a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical manner. We evaluated body mass index (BMI), glycemic control (HbA1c fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels [FPG, and FPI, respectively], and homeostasis model assessment [HOMA] index), lipid profile (total cholesterol [TC], low density lipoprotein-cholesterol [LDL-C], high density lipoprotein-cholesterol [HDL-C], and triglycerides [TG]), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and leptin during the 12 months of this treatment. No BMI change was observed after 6 or 12 months in either group. Significant decreases in HbAlc and FPG were observed after 6 months in the telmisartan group, and after 12 months in both groups. The decrease in HbA1c and FPG at 12 months was statistically significant only in the telmisartan group. A significant decrease in FPI was observed at 12 months in both groups, and this decrease was significantly greater in the telmisartan group. Significant decreases in the HOMA index were observed at 6 and 12 months in both groups, and the decrease in the HOMA index after 12 months was significantly greater in the telmisartan group than in the irbesartan group. Significant changes in SBP, DBP, TC, and LDL-C were observed after 6 and 12 months in both groups. Significant decreases in TNF-alpha and leptin levels were observed after 6 months in the telmisartan group, and after 12 months in both groups. In conclusion, in this study of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome, telmisartan seemed to result in a greater improvement in glycemic and lipid control and metabolic parameters related to metabolic syndrome compared to irbesartan. These observed metabolic effects of different angiotensin type 1 receptor blockers could be relevant when choosing a therapy to correct metabolic derangement of patients affected by metabolic syndrome and diabetes.

Effects of Doxazosin and Irbesartan on Blood Pressure and Metabolic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension

The objective of this trial was to compare the metabolic effects of long-term treatment with doxazosin to those of irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. We evaluated 96 hypertensive diabetic patients who were randomized to 12 months of double-blind treatment with doxazosin 4 mg/d or irbesartan 300 mg/d. At the end of the study, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) were significantly reduced from 152 to 140 mm Hg and from 97 to 87 mm Hg, respectively, with doxazosin (P < 0.01). SBP and DBP were reduced from 150 to 134 mm Hg and from 94 to 83 mm Hg, respectively, with irbesartan (P < 0.01). Irbesartan had significantly better antihypertensive efficacy than doxazosin (P < 0.05). Doxazosin had the greatest effect on glucose metabolism and lipid parameters, with significant (P </= 0.05) reductions observed at study end compared with baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, fasting plasma insulin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and Homeostasis Model Assessment Index. In conclusion, both doxazosin and irbesartan reduced BP during long-term treatment, but not to recommended levels, and doxazosin had the more beneficial effect on glucose metabolism and lipid profile.

Angiotensin II receptor antagonist treatment during pregnancy

Angiotensin II (A-II) is the main effector of the renin-angiotensin system. A-II functions by binding its type 1 (AT1) receptors to cause vasoconstriction and retention of sodium and fluid. Several AT1 receptor antagonists-a group of drugs collectively called "sartans"-have been marketed during the past few years for treatment of hypertension and heart failure. At least 15 case reports describe oligohydramnios, fetal growth retardation, pulmonary hypoplasia, limb contractures, and calvarial hypoplasia in various combinations in association with maternal losartan, candesartan, valsartan, or telmisartan treatment during the second or third trimester of pregnancy. Stillbirth or neonatal death is frequent in these reports, and surviving infants may exhibit renal damage. The fetal abnormalities, which are strikingly similar to those produced by maternal treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, are probably related to extreme sensitivity of the fetus to the hypotensive action of these drugs. Very little information is available regarding the outcome of human pregnancies in which the mother was treated with an AT1 receptor antagonist during the first trimester, but animal studies have not demonstrated teratogenic effects after maternal treatment with large doses of AT1 receptor antagonists during organogenesis. We conclude that pharmacological suppression of the fetal renin-angiotensin system through ACE inhibition or AT1 receptor blockade seems to disrupt fetal vascular perfusion and renal function. We recommend that maternal treatment with AT1 receptor antagonists be avoided during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy and that women who become pregnant while taking one of these medications be changed to an antihypertensive drug of a different class as soon as the pregnancy is recognized.

Effect of eprosartan on catecholamines and peripheral haemodynamics in subjects with insulin-induced hypoglycaemia

ANG II (angiotensin II) facilitates catecholamine release from the adrenal medulla and neuronal NE (noradrenaline) release. Since animal experiments point to specific sympatho-inhibitory properties of the AT1 (ANG II type 1)-receptor blocker EPRO (eprosartan), the primary aim of this study was to clarify if EPRO inhibits sympathetic reactivity in humans as determined by the effect of EPRO on insulin-induced catecholamine release. Sixteen healthy male volunteers were randomized in a double-blind cross-over study to receive a single dose of EPRO (600 mg) compared with placebo, followed by insulin-induced hypoglycaemia [0.15 IU (international unit)/kg of body weight; intravenous bolus] on two study days 1 week apart. From baseline to the end of hypoglycaemia (170 min), the sympatho-adrenal reactivity was mapped by invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring and repeated measurements of FBF (forearm blood flow), arterial and venous concentrations of glucose, catecholamines [EPI (adrenaline) and NE (noradrenaline)], renin, ANG II and aldosterone. EPRO induced an 8–10-fold increase in plasma renin and ANG II concentrations compared with placebo. Plasma glucose decreased equally during placebo and EPRO from baseline 5.9 mmol/l to 1.9 mmol/l and 2.1 mmol/l respectively, inducing a 17-fold increase in arterial EPI concentration at peak. The AUC (area under the curve) during hypoglycaemia for arterial EPI concentrations was 314±48 nmol·min·l−1 in placebo compared with 254±26 nmol·min·l−1 following EPRO treatment (P=0.14). EPRO attenuated the corresponding AUC for the EPI-induced pulse pressure response (4670±219 mmHg·min in EPRO compared with 5004±266 mmHg·min in placebo; P=0.02). Moreover, EPRO caused a less pronounced increase in FBF compared with placebo (402±30 compared with 479±46 ml·100 g−1 of body weight; P=0.04). Musculocutaneous NE release was not affected by EPRO and the AUC for NE release was 51.69±15.5 pmol·min−1·100 g−1 of body weight in placebo compared with 39.35±18.2 pmol·min−1·100 g−1 of body weight after EPRO treatment (P=0.57). In conclusion, EPRO did not significantly inhibit sympathetic reactivity compared with placebo; however, it blunted the haemodynamic responses elicited by the sympatho-adrenal stimulation which only tended to be attenuated by this drug.

Candesartan Cilexetil

Candesartan cilexetil is the orally administered pro-drug of candesartan, a highly selective antagonist of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor that mediates the pressor activities of angiotensin II. Candesartan cilexetil is widely used for the treatment of hypertension and has recently been approved in Europe for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) in patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Results of the CHARM (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) programme suggest that oral candesartan cilexetil reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with CHF and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =40%. There are cardiovascular benefits when candesartan cilexetil is administered as an alternative to an ACE inhibitor, or as an add-on to current treatment regimens that include an ACE inhibitor, in symptomatic CHF. While tolerability is generally good, renal monitoring is required. The recent approval of candesartan cilexetil as both add-on and alternative therapy to ACE inhibitors in patients with CHF and impaired LV systolic function recognises the cardiovascular benefits of candesartan cilexetil in both types of treatment regimens.

Effects of losartan and valsartan on left ventricular hypertrophy and function in essential hypertension

This study compared the effect of losartan and valsartan on left ventricular mass (LVM) and function in patients with untreated essential hypertension and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). Thirty patients (17 men and 13 women; mean age, 48+/-8 years) with untreated essential hypertension and concentric LVH, as determined by echocardiographic assessment, were randomly assigned in equal numbers and double-blind fashion to receive either losartan 50 to 100 mg/d or valsartan 80 to 160 mg/d. Doppler echocardiograms were obtained from each patient before treatment, at the time of initial blood pressure control, and then after 6 months. A significant reduction (P<.01) in LVM index was observed in both the losartan group (from 57.1+/-7.2 g/m2.7 to 51.5+/-6.1 g/m2.7) and the valsartan group (from 58.1+/-8.4 g/m2.7 to 48.2+/-6.2 g/m27), but the reduction was higher (P<.05) in the valsartan group. The predicted midwall fractional shortening improved significantly in both the losartan group (from 81+/-8% to 89+/-9%, P<.05) and the valsartan group (from 78+/-7% to 91+/-9%, P<.01). Similarly, the early peak/peak atrial velocity ratio improved significantly both in the losartan group (from 0.78+/-0.4 to 0.88+/-0.3, P<.05) and the valsartan group (from 0.84+/-0.3 to 0.94+/-0.4, P<.01). These results indicate that valsartan is more effective than losartan in reducing LVM index in hypertensive patients with concentric LVH. This effect is associated with improvement in midwall systolic performance and left ventricular diastolic function.

A randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group comparison of perindopril and candesartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

When choosing an antihypertensive drug for patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM), the metabolic side effects, possibility of improving some metabolic parameters, and need for adequate blood pressure control must all be considered.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to compare the impacts of perindopril and candesartan on blood pressure, glucose metabolism, serum lipid profile, and metabolic parameters in patients with mild hypertension and type 2 DM during therapy and after a 1-month washout period.

METHODS

Type 2 DM patients with mild hypertension and good glucose control who were not taking hypercholesterolemic drugs were enrolled. Perindopril 4 mg QD or candesartan 16 mg QD was administered for 12 months in this randomized, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), glycosylated hemoglobin, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]), plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), homocysteine, body mass index (BMI), and albumin excretion rate (AER) were assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (49 women and 47 men; mean [SD] ages, 53 [10] years [perindopril] and 55 [9] years [candesartan]) were enrolled. Mean (SD) body weight, height, and BMI were 78.2 (9.4) kg, 1.69 (0.05) m, and 27.2 (2.0) kg/m(2) in the perindopril group and 77.5 (8.6) kg, 1.70 (0.06) m, and 26.8 (2.5) kg/m(2) in the candesartan group. A significant change occurred from baseline to month 12 during treatment with perindopril in SBP and DBP (both P < 0.01), FPG (P < 0.05), FPI (P < 0.05), TC (P < 0.05), LDL-C (P < 0.05), Lp(a) (P < 0.05), PAM (P < 0.05), and AER (P < 0.05). Significant changes from baseline to month 12 occurred with candesartan in SBP and DBP (both P < 0.01) and AER (P < 0.05). The HOMA index was significantly lower at month 12 in the perindopril group than in the candesartan group (P < 0.05). When we interrupted perindopril and candesartan therapy for a 1-month washout period, changes in SBP and DBP values were significant compared with month 12 in both groups (all P < 0.05). Changes in TC and LDL-C from month 12 to the end of washout were significant only in the perindopril group (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Perindopril and candesartan both effectively lowered blood pressure in this group of patients with mild hypertension and type 2 DM. Perindopril showed an improvement on some metabolic parameters compared with candesartan. However, the inclusion/exclusion criteria could limit the ability to extrapolate the results to a general population.

Differing Anti-Proteinuric Action of Candesartan and Losartan in Chronic Renal Disease

It has becoming clear that angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) show varying levels of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocking activity. Although the duration of activity and the efficacy on blood pressure of ARB are reported to vary, depending on the agents used, it has not been examined whether the effects on proteinuria and urinary nitrite/nitrate (NOx) excretion differ in hypertensive patients with chronic renal disease. In the present study, patients with hypertension (> 140 and/or 90 mmHg) and chronic renal disease (proteinuria > 0.5g/day; serum creatinine < 265 micromol/l or creatinine clearance > 30 ml/min/1.72 m2) were randomly assigned to perindopril- (n = 15), trandolapril- (n = 15), candesartan- (n = 17), and losartan-treated groups (n = 15), and were followed up for 96 weeks. All agents decreased blood pressure to the same level, and none of them had any effect on creatinine clearance. Candesartan, perindopril, and trandolapril reduced proteinuria markedly (from 3.0 +/- 0.6 to 1.8 +/- 0.5 g/day, 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.6 +/- 0.4 g/day, and 2.7 +/- 0.5 to 1.7 +/- 0.4 g/day, respectively) at 12 weeks, and the beneficial effect persisted throughout the study. The effect of losartan, however, diminished over the study period. Whereas perindopril, trandolapril, and candesartan markedly increased urinary NOx excretion (from 257 +/- 23 to 1,011 +/- 150 micromol/day, 265 +/- 70 to 986 +/- 130 micromol/day, and 260 +/- 62 to 967 +/- 67 micromol/day at 12 weeks, respectively), a relatively blunted increase was observed with losartan (from 309 +/- 42 to 596 +/- 64 micromol/day). In conclusion, renal action of ARB varies, with relatively less proteinuria-sparing, as well as NOx-enhancing, effects observed with candesartan showing the greatest reduction of proteinuria and greatest enhancement of NOx. Furthermore, renal nitric oxide may contribute to the renal protective action of these agents when administered to patients with chronic renal disease.