Assessment of recombinant human parathyroid hormone: correlation of LC methods with bioassays

Analysis of streptokinase by validated liquid chromatography methods and correlation with an in vitro bioassay

Reversed-phase and size-exclusion liquid chromatography methods were validated for the assessment of streptokinase. The reversed-phase method was carried out on a Jupiter C₄ column (250 mm × 4.6 mm id) maintained at 25°C. The mobile phase consisted of 50 mM sodium sulfate solution pH 7.0 and methanol (90:10, v/v), run isocratically at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min. The size-exclusion method was carried out on a Protein KW 802.5 column (300 mm × 8.0 mm id), at 25°C. The mobile phase consisted of 40 mM sodium acetate solution pH 7.0, run isocratically at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Retention times were 19.3 min, and 14.1 min, and calibration curves were linear over the concentration range of 0.25-250 μg/mL (25.75-25 750 IU/mL) (r² = 0.9997) and 5-80 μg/mL (515-8240 IU/mL) (r² = 0.9996), respectively, for reversed-phase and size exclusion, with detection at 220 and 204 nm. Chromatographic methods were employed in conjunction with the in vitro bioassay for the content/potency assessment of Streptokinase, contributing to improve the quality control and ensure the efficacy of the biotherapeutic.

Evaluation of recombinant human parathyroid hormone by CZE method and its correlation with in vitro bioassay and LC methods

A stability-indicating capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) method was validated to assess the content/potency of the recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH 1-34), using ranitidine as internal standard (IS). A fused-silica capillary, (i.d. of 50µm; effective length of 40cm) was used at 25°C; the applied voltage was 20kV. The background electrolyte solution consisted of 50mmolL^-1 sodium dihydrogen phosphate solution at pH 3.0. Injections were performed using a pressure mode at 50 mbar for 45s, with detection by photodiode array (PDA) detector set at 200nm. Separation was obtained with a migration time of 5.3min, and was linear over the concentration range of 0.25-250µgmL^-1 (r² =0.9992). Specificity and stability-indicating capability were established in degradation studies, which also showed that there was no interference of the excipients. The accuracy was 100.28% with bias lower than 0.85%. Analyses of the same batches showed mean differences of the estimated content/potencies of 0.61%, 1.31% higher and 0.86% lower as compared to the validated reversed-phase and size exclusion liquid chromatography methods, and to the UMR-106 cell culture bioassay, respectively, with non-significant differences (p>0.05). Degraded forms were also subjected to the in vitro cytotoxicity test. The results obtained showed the capabilities of each one of the methods, and constitute an alternative strategy to monitor stability, improve the quality control and ensure the batch-to-batch consistency of bulk and finished biotechnology-derived medicine.