Performance inventory for profound and severe loss (PIPSL)

Using Complex Networks in the Hearing Sciences

In this Point of View, we review a number of recent discoveries from the emerging, interdisciplinary field of Network Science , which uses graph theoretic techniques to understand complex systems. In the network science approach, nodes represent entities in a system, and connections are placed between nodes that are related to each other to form a web-like network . We discuss several studies that demonstrate how the micro-, meso-, and macro-level structure of a network of phonological word-forms influence spoken word recognition in listeners with normal hearing and in listeners with hearing loss. Given the discoveries made possible by this new approach and the influence of several complex network measures on spoken word recognition performance we argue that speech recognition measures-originally developed in the late 1940s and routinely used in clinical audiometry-should be revised to reflect our current understanding of spoken word recognition. We also discuss other ways in which the tools of network science can be used in Speech and Hearing Sciences and Audiology more broadly.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction: Content Validity and Readability

PURPOSE

Numerous patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are available to measure hearing aid benefit and satisfaction. It is unclear to what extent currently available PROMs on hearing aid outcomes, often developed decades ago, meet current guidelines for good content validity and readability. This study evaluated the content validity and readability of PROMs that focus on perceived hearing aid benefit and/or satisfaction.

METHOD

A literature review was conducted to identify eligible instruments. Content validity evaluation included mapping extracted questionnaire items to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. In addition, study design in content validity methodology was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments study design checklist for PROM instruments. Readability was estimated using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook measure.

RESULTS

Thirteen questionnaires were identified and evaluated. Item content focused primarily on the components of environmental factors as well as activity limitations and participation restrictions with less emphasis on body functions and personal factors. The content validity methodology analysis revealed an underuse or lack of reporting of a qualitative methodology in assessing patient and professional perspectives. All the included questionnaires exceeded the recommended sixth-grade reading level.

CONCLUSIONS

The categories covered by hearing aid PROMs vary considerably, with no single instrument comprehensively covering all the key ICF components. Future development of hearing aid outcome measures should consider a mixed methodology approach for improved content validity and ensure an appropriate reading level.

Development of the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for auditory-visual, cognitive and psychosocial functioning (hAVICOP)

INTRODUCTION

There is a need for a validated and standardized self-assessment instrument to assess the subjective effect of hearing aid (HA) use and/or cochlear implantation (CI) on different aspects of functioning in daily life. The aim of this study was to develop a new holistic Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) to assess hearing-related quality of life. The new PROM is titled the hearing-related quality of life questionnaire for Auditory-VIsual, COgnitive and Psychosocial functioning (hAVICOP).

METHODS

A conceptual framework was set up and test items were prepared per domain. Preliminary testing involved a semi-structured interview-based assessment in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults and an expert panel. For the further psychometric evaluation, a new sample of 15 adult HA users, 20 adult CI users and 20 normal-hearing adults filled in the refined version of the hAVICOP, the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and the TNO-AZL Questionnaire for Adult's Health-Related Quality of Life. Based on these results, a factor analysis was conducted and internal consistency, discriminant validity and concurrent construct validity were determined.

RESULTS

The final version of the hAVICOP consists of three domains for hearing-related quality of life: (1) auditory-visual functioning, (2) cognitive functioning, and (3) psychosocial functioning. A sufficient internal consistency was found, and discriminant validity and concurrent construct validity were good.

CONCLUSIONS

A new PROM to assess hearing-related quality of life was developed, named the hAVICOP. In the future the validity and reliability should be examined further.

Systematic Review on Late Cochlear Implantation in Early-Deafened Adults and Adolescents: Clinical Effectiveness

OBJECTIVES

Cochlear implantation in early-deafened patients, implanted as adolescents or adults, is not always advised due to poor expected outcomes. In order to judge whether such reluctance is justified, the current systematic review aimed to gather all available evidence on postoperative outcomes obtained by early-deafened patients using a state-of-the art cochlear implant (CI).

DESIGN

Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, CINAHL, and PsycInfo) were systematically searched for studies in English, French, German, or Dutch, published between 2000 and September 2017. Studies that reported pre- and postoperative outcomes on any measure of speech or sound perception, audiovisual or subjective benefit (quality of life) were included. Study quality was assessed with the Institute of Health Economics quality appraisal tool for case series studies.

RESULTS

The systematic search and subsequent full-text evaluation identified 38 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Only a limited number of studies were judged to be of high quality according to the Institute of Health Economics tool, with lack of (clear) presentation of relevant study information being a recurring problem. Twenty-five studies presented viable outcomes on open-set speech understanding in quiet: mean postoperative scores obtained with CI remained below 50% for the vast majority of studies; significant postoperative improvements were found in 16 studies, although this number might have been higher if appropriate statistical testing had been performed in all studies. Eight studies observed increased audiovisual performance after implantation, which was statistically significant in six studies. A validated measure of hearing-related quality of life was used in only 5 of the 16 studies assessing subjective outcomes, showing significant postoperative improvements for most questionnaire domains. The relation between auditory and subjective outcomes was assessed in two studies, with contradictory results.

CONCLUSIONS

The current review showed that late cochlear implantation in early-deafened subjects resulted in significantly improved open-set speech perception, audiovisual speech perception, and (hearing-related) quality of life in the majority of the studies involved. Nonetheless, more and especially higher-quality research is needed in order to gain a more detailed understanding of the outcomes of cochlear implantation in this population.

Hearing loss and quality of life

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify multidimensional factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for use in developing an inventory in which HRQoL is a core concept in evaluating the impact of hearing loss and the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions.

METHOD

A qualitative approach was used in which we posed two major questions to a focus group consisting of eight adults with self-reported, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss of varying degrees. In essence, those questions were: (1) How do you define quality of life?, and (2) Can you describe specific incidents in your everyday life in which your hearing loss has impacted your quality of life? The discussion was embedded within a framework that utilized a modification of the Critical Incident Technique (CIT). We used well-established analytic techniques to translate the data into unitized thought units, which we coded into meaningful categories. Response frequency was used to determine the salience of responses in addressing the research questions.

RESULTS

Participants defined QoL in terms of a number of primary dimensions, most of which were directly or indirectly associated with specific recalled incidents in which those dimensions have played a notable role in contributing to their QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of well-established methods to gather and analyze qualitative data generated by self-report techniques offers a promising direction for developing a standardized inventory for identifying the factors that impact QoL for persons with hearing loss and for evaluating the success of intervention strategies aimed at improving their HRQoL.

A Data-Driven Synthesis of Research Evidence for Domains of Hearing Loss, as Reported by Adults With Hearing Loss and Their Communication Partners

A number of assessment tools exist to evaluate the impact of hearing loss, with little consensus among researchers as to either preference or psychometric adequacy. The item content of hearing loss assessment tools should seek to capture the impact of hearing loss on everyday life, but to date no one has synthesized the range of hearing loss complaints from the perspectives of the person with hearing loss and their communication partner. The current review aims to synthesize the evidence on person with hearing loss- and communication partner-reported complaints of hearing loss. Searches were conducted in Cos Conference Papers Index, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Excerpta Medica Database, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify publications from May 1982 to August 2015. A manual search of four relevant journals updated the search to May 2017. Of the 9,516 titles identified, 78 records (comprising 20,306 participants) met inclusion criteria and were taken through to data collection. Data were analyzed using meta-ethnography to form domains representing the person with hearing loss- and communication partner-reported complaints of hearing loss as reported in research. Domains and subdomains mutual to both perspectives are related to “Auditory” (listening, communicating, and speaking), “Social” (relationships, isolation, social life, occupational, and interventions), and “Self” (effort and fatigue, emotions, identity, and stigma). Our framework contributes fundamental new knowledge and a unique resource that enables researchers and clinicians to consider the broader impacts of hearing loss. Our findings can also be used to guide questions during diagnostic assessment and to evaluate existing measures of hearing loss.

Cochlear Implants and Health Status: A Comparison with other Hearing-Impaired Patients

Eighty-four adult cochlear implant (CI) users were compared with 3 other groups of severely to profoundly hearing impaired adults concerning quality of life (QOL): 1) 19 CI candidates who were accepted as candidates for implantation, but who were not operated on; 2) 16 CI candidates whose impairment was not severe enough for implantation; and 3) 60 users of acoustic hearing aids. Generic and disease-specific QOL questionnaires were used. The CI group scored significantly better than the CI candidates who met the criteria for implantation, but who were not operated on, on 2 of 6 categories of a disease-specific QOL measure. The CI patients had significantly less anxiety and depression than the unoperated CI candidates who met the criteria for implantation. Validation and reliability testing of 2 disease-specific QOL measures were performed by factor analyses.

Background sounds and hearing-aid users: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

A scoping review focused on background sounds and adult hearing-aid users, including aspects of aversiveness and interference. The aim was to establish the current body of knowledge, identify knowledge gaps, and to suggest possible future directions for research.

DESIGN

Data were gathered using a systematic search strategy, consistent with scoping review methodology.

STUDY SAMPLE

Searches of public databases between 1988 and 2014 returned 1182 published records. After exclusions for duplicates and out-of- scope works, 75 records remained for further analysis. Content analysis was used to group the records into five separate themes.

RESULTS

Content analysis indicated numerous themes relating to background sounds. Five broad emergent themes addressed the development and validation of outcome instruments, satisfaction surveys, assessments of hearing-aid technology and signal processing, acclimatization to the device post-fitting, and non-auditory influences on benefit and satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

A large proportion of hearing-aid users still find particular hearing-aid features and attributes dissatisfying when listening in background sounds. Many conclusions are limited by methodological drawbacks in study design and too many different outcome instruments. Future research needs to address these issues, while controlling for hearing-aid fitting.

Social hearing measured with the Performance Inventory for Profound and Severe Loss: a comparison between adult multichannel cochlear implant patients and users of acoustical hearing aids

The objective of this study was to investigate social hearing in successful users of multichannel cochlear implants (CIs) and to compare the scores with those of a group of hearing-impaired adults using acoustical hearing aids (HAs). Out of 88 patients who had undergone surgery, 75 CI users with a mean age of 55 years and a mean pre-operative hearing level of 113dB in the better ear were compared with 59 users of acoustical HAs with a mean age of 56 years and a mean hearing level of 82dB in the better ear. Seven CI patients were non-users and were excluded from the study. The Performance Inventory for Profound and Severe Loss, a questionnaire that measures different aspects of hearing handicap, was used. The CI group scored significantly better than the HA group in three of six evaluated categories, measuring subjective intensity of sounds, speech with visual cues, and response to auditory failure. Awareness of environmental sounds, speech with no visual cues and personal reactions did not differ significantly. The group of successful CI users scored higher on a self-report measure than did a group of users of acoustical HAs with moderate- severe-profound deafness. The best CI users scored better than the best HA users, and the worst CI users scored worse than the worst HA users.

Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test

OBJECTIVES

Assessment of cochlear implant outcomes centers around speech discrimination. Despite dramatic improvements in speech perception, music perception remains a challenge for most cochlear implant users. No standardized test exists to quantify music perception in a clinically practical manner. This study presents the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception (CAMP) test as a reliable and valid music perception test for English-speaking, adult cochlear implant users.

DESIGN

Forty-two cochlear implant subjects were recruited from the University of Washington Medical Center cochlear implant program and referred by two implant manufacturers. Ten normal-hearing volunteers were drawn from the University of Washington Medical Center and associated campuses. A computer-driven, self-administered test was developed to examine three specific aspects of music perception: pitch direction discrimination, melody recognition, and timbre recognition. The pitch subtest used an adaptive procedure to determine just-noticeable differences for complex tone pitch direction discrimination within the range of 1 to 12 semitones. The melody and timbre subtests assessed recognition of 12 commonly known melodies played with complex tones in an isochronous manner and eight musical instruments playing an identical five-note sequence, respectively. Testing was repeated for cochlear implant subjects to evaluate test-retest reliability. Normal-hearing volunteers were also tested to demonstrate differences in performance in the two populations.

RESULTS

For cochlear implant subjects, pitch direction discrimination just-noticeable differences ranged from 1 to 8.0 semitones (Mean = 3.0, SD = 2.3). Melody and timbre recognition ranged from 0 to 94.4% correct (mean = 25.1, SD = 22.2) and 20.8 to 87.5% (mean = 45.3, SD = 16.2), respectively. Each subtest significantly correlated at least moderately with both Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word recognition scores and spondee recognition thresholds in steady state noise and two-talker babble. Intraclass coefficients demonstrating test-retest correlations for pitch, melody, and timbre were 0.85, 0.92, and 0.69, respectively. Normal-hearing volunteers had a mean pitch direction discrimination threshold of 1.0 semitone, the smallest interval tested, and mean melody and timbre recognition scores of 87.5 and 94.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAMP test discriminates a wide range of music perceptual ability in cochlear implant users. Moderate correlations were seen between music test results and both Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant word recognition scores and spondee recognition thresholds in background noise. Test-retest reliability was moderate to strong. The CAMP test provides a reliable and valid metric for a clinically practical, standardized evaluation of music perception in adult cochlear implant users.

Etanercept Treatment for Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease: Results of a Pilot Placebo-Controlled Study

PURPOSE

Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease (AIED) is an idiopathic progressive, often bilateral, sensironeural hearing loss that occurs over weeks to months, generally resulting in significant auditory disability. Response to treatment with immunomodulators other than corticosteroids has been poor. Data from a guinea pig model of AIED and a recent open label trial of etanercept suggested potential treatment benefit. Based on these preliminary results, we conducted a pilot placebo controlled trial of etanercept in AIED patients.

METHODS

Twenty AIED patients were enrolled in a 12-week blinded placebo (PLA) controlled randomized clinical trial of etanercept (ETA) with 25 mg SC twice weekly. Patients received treatment for 8 weeks with a 4-week follow-up off-treatment. The primary study endpoint was an improvement in pure tone threshold (PTA) of 10 Db in two consecutive frequencies and/or improvement in speech discrimination of >12% at week 8.

RESULTS

Patient demographics were similar for the ETA and PLA patients. Seventeen subjects (8 ETA, 9 PLA) completed the trial. The 3 dropouts were due to lack of efficacy. One ETA and 2 PLA subjects achieved the primary endpoint (p > 0.999). One ETA and 1 PLA pt demonstrated improved in hearing loss and vertigo severity by VAS and hearing disability. No safety issues were observed.

CONCLUSION

The results of this pilot trial demonstrate that etanercept 25 mg twice weekly for 8 weeks was no better than placebo for treatment of AIED in this patient population.

Tinnitus in cochlear implant patients--a comparison with other hearing-impaired patients

As part of a quality of life study, 84 patients who received multichannel intra-cochlear cochlear implants (CIs) were evaluated regarding tinnitus problems by a questionnaire. As controls, 60 hearing aid (HA) users and 35 non-operated CI candidates were used. The prevalence of tinnitus in the CI group was 70%, and that of troublesome tinnitus was 35%. In the two other groups, the prevalences of tinnitus were 40% (HA) and 74% (non-CI). Twenty-three per cent of HA users and 51% of non-operated CI candidates had troublesome tinnitus. CIs were found to be superior to HAs in reducing tinnitus, 54% of the CI patients with tinnitus experiencing a reduction in tinnitus when using a CI. In the other two groups, 4% of HA users and 23% of non-operated CI candidates experienced a reduction in tinnitus when using an HA. Eight per cent of the CI patients with tinnitus experienced an increase in tinnitus when using their implant. Not having paid employment was independently associated with troublesome tinnitus in all three groups.

Cochlear implantation for adolescents and adults with prelinguistic deafness

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have suggested that individuals with long-term prelinguistic deafness who receive cochlear implants show little improvement in speech recognition skills. The purpose of this study was to examine the auditory functioning of individuals with prelinguistic deafness who received cochlear implants after the age of 12.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective study of open-set speech recognition was undertaken for 15 patients (adolescents and adults) with prelinguistic deafness who underwent implantation in the Ottawa Cochlear Implant Program. The results of open-set speech perception tests, both words and sentences, were reviewed to assess auditory functioning after implantation. Qualitative data using the Performance Inventory for Profound and Severe Loss questionnaire were also collected for the adults.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results of this study indicate that individuals with long-term prelinguistic deafness can achieve significant open-set speech understanding with a cochlear implant, although there is a wide range of performance across patients. The results ranged from 0% to 74% for words and 0% to 98% for sentences.

Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure

A table of available self-report inventories used throughout the world is provided with references for obtaining necessary psychometric data for research or clinical applications. Considerations for choosing an inventory (reliability, validity, and content appropriateness) are discussed and issues related to group versus single-subject applications examined. It is preferable that translation and revalidation of existing outcome measures be considered above developing new ones for international application.

Criterion validity of the Language Background Questionnaire: a self-assessment instrument

The present investigation examined relationships between the Language Background Questionnaire (LBQ) self-assessed sign language skills. LBQ self-assessed spoken communication skills, and formal independent sign and spoken communication skills assessments of young adults who are deaf or hard of hearing. Results indicated a high degree of congruence between self-assessed communication skills and formal independent assessments of communication skills. The findings establish reasonable criterion validity for the LBQ regarding self-assessed sign language and spoken communication skills.

Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Programs at the University of Michigan

The Cochlear Implant Program at the University of Michigan has evolved over the past several years and is strongly dependent on a team approach to clinical care. Members of the team work closely together to assist patients and their families as they participate in the implant evaluation and rehabilitation process. We feel fortunate that we have been able to help so many profoundly deaf individuals and look forward to continued growth and future advances that will inevitably come about in the field of cochlear implants.

Evaluation of decisions regarding candidates for cochlear implants

Stepwise regression analysis was used to evaluate measures predictive of the selection of candidates for cochlear implants. Results of a comprehensive selection protocol were compiled for a group of 31 profoundly hearing-impaired adults undergoing intensive pre-selection evaluation. Data included: unaided audiologic; aided audiologic; vestibular; otologic; medical; radiologic; voice/speech; speechreading; psychoacoustic; and electrophysiologic parameters. The results of the Cochlear Implant Team's decisions concerning selections of patients for implants were compared with the predictive outcome of regression analysis. Ramifications for the construction of cochlear implant evaluation protocols are discussed.