Local and systemic effects of peritoneal lavage with high concentrations of adenosine in rats

A novel adenosine precursor 2',3'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate inhibits formation of post-surgical adhesions

BACKGROUND

Intraperitoneal adenosine reduces abdominal adhesions. However, because of the ultra-short half-life and low solubility of adenosine, optimal efficacy requires multiple dosing.

AIM

Here, we compared the ability of potential adenosine prodrugs to inhibit post-surgical abdominal adhesions after a single intraperitoneal dose.

METHODS

Abdominal adhesions were induced in mice using an electric toothbrush to damage the cecum. Also, 20 μL of 95 % ethanol was applied to the cecum to cause chemically induced injury. After injury, mice received intraperitoneally either saline (n = 18) or near-solubility limit of adenosine (23 mmol/L; n = 12); 5'-adenosine monophosphate (75 mmol/L; n = 11); 3'-adenosine monophosphate (75 mmol/L; n = 12); 2'-adenosine monophosphate (75 mmol/L; n = 12); 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (75 mmol/L; n = 19); or 2',3'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (75 mmol/L; n = 20). After 2 weeks, adhesion formation was scored by an observer blinded to the treatments. In a second study, intraperitoneal adenosine levels were measured using tandem mass spectrometry for 3 h after instillation of 2',3'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (75 mmol/L) into the abdomen.

RESULTS

The order of efficacy for attenuating adhesion formation was: 2',3'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate > 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate ≈ adenosine > 5'-adenosine monophosphate ≈ 3'-adenosine monophosphate ≈ 2'-adenosine monophosphate. The groups were compared using a one-factor analysis of variance, and the overall p value for differences between groups was p < 0.000001. Intraperitoneal administration of 2',3'-cAMP yielded pharmacologically relevant levels of adenosine in the abdominal cavity for >3 h.

CONCLUSION

Administration of 2',3'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate into the surgical field is a unique, convenient and effective method of preventing post-surgical adhesions by acting as an adenosine prodrug.

Intraperitoneal, but not enteric, adenosine administration improves survival after volume-controlled hemorrhagic shock in rats

OBJECTIVE

To circumvent the potential adverse systemic side effects of adenosine, this study explored the potential benefit of intraperitoneal or enteric adenosine on survival and inflammatory responses after volume-controlled hemorrhagic shock.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, and blinded. A three-phase, volume-controlled hemorrhagic shock model was used: hemorrhagic shock phase (120 mins), resuscitation phase (60 mins), and observation phase (72 hrs). Three groups were compared: controls, intraperitoneal adenosine, and enteric adenosine.

SETTING

Animal research facility.

SUBJECTS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats.

INTERVENTIONS

Starting at 20 mins of hemorrhagic shock and continuing through the resuscitation phase, all three groups received both intraperitoneal lavage and repeated bolus injections into the ileum of vehicle (normal saline) or adenosine. In the intraperitoneal adenosine group (n = 10), adenosine solution (0.1 mM) was used for intraperitoneal lavage. In the enteric adenosine group (n = 10), adenosine (1.0 mM) was injected into the ileum. Blood cytokine concentrations and leukocyte infiltration in lungs and liver were studied in 12 separate rats (control and intraperitoneal adenosine, n = 6 each) with the same hemorrhagic shock model at resuscitation time 1 hr or 4 hrs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mean arterial pressure and heart rate were similar between the three groups during hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation. Potassium, lactate, and blood urea nitrogen concentrations were lower and arterial pH was higher in the intraperitoneal and enteric adenosine groups compared with the control group (both p <.05). Survival time to 72 hrs was longer in the intraperitoneal adenosine group than in the control group(p <.05). Neither plasma interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations nor leukocyte infiltration in the lungs and liver was different between the control and intraperitoneal adenosine groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of adenosine via the intraperitoneal route improves survival time after severe volume-controlled hemorrhagic shock in rats without worsening hypotension or bradycardia. This beneficial effect may not be attributable to effects of adenosine on the inflammatory response.