Encouraging preliminary results in 12 patients with high-risk haematological malignancies by omitting graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic transplantation

Photochemotherapy and Graft-versus-Leukemia Reaction in Acute Leukemia: Tumor Immunity and Survival Are Dependent on Timing of Photochemotherapy of the Skin

BACKGROUND

Cure of acute leukemia after transplantation is mediated by the grafted cells. We investigated the graft-versus-leukemia effect (GVL) in patients with cutaneous acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) treated with photochemotherapy (psoralen and ultraviolet light type A).

METHOD

Forty-seven patients with acute leukemia were followed 5,000 days after transplantation to assess survival and GVL by multivariate analysis. The primary predictor was time to treatment of cutaneous acute GVHD by photochemotherapy separated into treatment start during the first week of acute GVHD versus after the first week of acute GVHD.

RESULTS

Photochemotherapy started after the first week of acute GVHD predicted GVL with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.94 (95% confidence interval, CI, 1.67-9.33, p = 0.0018) and survival with preserved GVL with an HR of 2.63 (95% CI 1.30-5.32, p = 0.007). The effects on GVL and survival with preserved GVL were present regardless of whether the patients were transplanted in remission or relapse (p < 0.05). Chronic GVHD came earlier in the group that started photochemotherapy after 1 week of acute GHVD, but chronic GVHD did not increase the GVL.

CONCLUSION

The timing of photochemotherapy after cutaneous acute GVHD may direct the GVL and predict long-term leukemia-free survival.

Prospective trial of high-dose chemotherapy followed by infusions of peripheral blood stem cells and dose-escalated donor lymphocytes for relapsed leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

To determine whether induction of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) improves the outcome of acute relapsed leukemia after stem cell transplantation (SCT), we used high-dose cytarabine (ara-C) followed by infusions of donor-derived buffy coats containing peripheral blood stem cells to treat 12 patients with relapsed leukemia. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) was repeated at least twice over a 5-week interval for patients in whom grade II to IV acute GVHD did not develop after the first DLI. Grade II to IV acute GVHD developed in 4 (33%) of the patients. Chronic GVHD developed in 3 patients, 2 of whom had not experienced acute GVHD. Four (67%) of the 6 patients who developed grade II to IV acute and/or chronic GVHD after DLI responded, but none of the other 6 patients responded. Four (33%) of the patients (2 with acute myelogenous leukemia [AML] and 2 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL]) achieved complete remission lasting longer than 4 months after the first DLI, but 3 of them had relapses in bone sites. Of these 4 patients, 1 patient with AML and 2 with ALL were alive 8 to 27 months after DLI. These findings indicate that high-dose ara-C combined with megadose DLI may produce durable remission of acute leukemia that has relapsed after SCT when GVHD is induced. The low induction rate of GVHD and extramedullary relapse after remission is achieved with DLI are problems yet to be solved.

Effect of graft-versus-host disease on the outcome of bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling donor using GVHD prophylaxis with cyclosporin A and methotrexate

The effect of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) on relapse incidence and survival has been analyzed in several studies, but previous studies included heterogeneous patients. Therefore, we analyzed the data of 2114 patients who received unmanipulated bone marrow graft from an HLA-identical sibling donor with a GVHD prophylaxis using cyclosporin A and methotrexate. Among the 1843 patients who survived without relapse at 60 days after transplantation, 435 (24%) developed grade II-IV acute GVHD. Among the 1566 patients who survived without relapse at 150 days after transplantation, 705 (47%) developed chronic GVHD. The incidence of relapse was significantly lower in patients who developed acute or chronic GVHD, but disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly inferior in patients who developed acute GVHD. A benefit of 'mild' GVHD was only seen in high-risk patients who developed grade I acute GVHD. The strongest association between GVHD and a decreased incidence of relapse was observed in patients with standard-risk acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome. In conclusion, the therapeutic window between decreased relapse and increased transplant-related mortality due to the development of GVHD appeared to be very narrow.

Separating graft-versus-tumor from graft-versus-host reactions

The full therapeutic potential of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, through its immunologically mediated graft-versus-tumor effect, in patients with hematologic malignancies is greatly compromised by the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease. Unfortunately, the use of non-selective immunosuppressive agents to reduce the incidence and severity of graft-versus-host disease is associated with severe immune compromise of the host and most likely a greater relapse risk of the underlying malignancy. Many attempts have been made to clinically separate these two effects. A critical overview of the published experience is the focus of this report. As the effector cells responsible for the two reactions are largely unknown, the limited success of the various approaches used is not surprising. A more thorough understanding of the antigenic stimuli involved in the initiation of the two reactions and of the molecular pathways through which the cytotoxic effects of T-cells are mediated is essential for abrogating graft-versus-host disease while preserving the graft-versus-tumor effect.