Adrenal incidentalomas and glucocorticoid autonomy

Endogenous subclinical hypercortisolism: Diagnostic uncertainties and clinical implications

Subclinical hypercortisolism (SH) is a newly characterized hormonal disorder that is almost exclusively detected in the context of incidentally discovered adrenal masses. The diagnostic criteria used for the definition of this condition are at present controversial. Amongst the various tests used for the detection of this abnormality (dexamethasone suppression, urinary free cortisol, ACTH levels, midnight serum or salivary cortisol concentrations, ACTH responses to CRH stimulation), the dexamethasone suppression tests (DST) seem to better accomplish the task of unmasking subtle abnormalities of cortisol secretion. Several versions of DST have been used: the 1-mg overnight, the 3-mg overnight and the classical 2-day low-dose DST. This latter test has the theoretical advantage that, by more efficiently suppressing pituitary ACTH secretion, it may provide a measure of the residual (ie non- ACTH-dependent) cortisol secretion from the adrenal mass. In this way, post-dexamethasone cortisol concentrations may quantify the degree of autonomous cortisol hypersecretion. In fact, post-dexamethasone cortisol concentrations have a negative correlation with basal ACTH levels and a positive correlation with midnight cortisol concentrations as well as the size of the incidentally discovered adrenal mass. Most of the existing data indicate that SH detected in the context of adrenal incidentalomas may have some clinically significant implications. In fact, patients with higher post-dexamethasone cortisol concentrations demonstrate higher lipid levels and lower bone mass densities. It has also been suggested that SH may be responsible for biochemical and phenotypic changes reminiscent of the metabolic syndrome. In summary, SH does exist and is associated with a negative impact in patients' health; however, hormonal cut-off criteria for decision-making remain to be defined.

Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series

Adrenal incidentalomas, defined as masses discovered incidentally during imaging investigation of non-adrenal disorders, have become a rather common finding in clinical practice. The prevalence is not well characterized and varies among studies. The aim of the present study was to perform a prospective evaluation of the prevalence of adrenal incidentalomas among subjects undergoing computerized tomography (CT) scan of the chest in a screening program of lung cancer (Tic TAC study) in Piedmont, a region of Northwestern Italy. This evaluation included 520 subjects (382 males and 138 females, aged between 55-82 yr), referred to our hospital from April to December 2001. Twenty-three patients with adrenal masses were identified: 21 adrenal adenomas, 1 myelolipoma, and 1 metastasis of lung cancer. Therefore, the overall prevalence of adrenal lesions was 4.4%, and that of benign adrenal masses was 4.2%. This prevalence is higher than those found in previous CT scan series reported in the literature, probably because of the use of high-resolution CT scanning technology. Another factor that influenced our results is that subject age is skewed towards the decades characterized by a greater occurrence of adrenal masses. The outcome of this study confirms that we are presently able to identify incidentally discovered adrenal masses more often than in early years and that the prevalence of adrenal incidentalomas on CT images is approaching that of autopsy series. The present study provides a reliable estimate of the prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma with currently used CT scanners. Notwithstanding that our subjects were at increased risk of lung cancer, the rate of adrenal metastases was low. We think that the present results can be generalized even if we may disclose the lack of histological diagnosis.

Spinal volumetric bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in female patients with adrenal incidentalomas: the effects of subclinical hypercortisolism and gonadal status

Although adrenal incidentalomas (AI) are not associated with clinically evident syndromes, some patients display biochemical features of subclinical hypercortisolism (SH). Previous studies indicated a negative effect of SH on bone in AI patients, but the prevalence of vertebral fractures and the roles of SH and gonadal status in volumetric bone mineral density are unknown. In 70 female AI patients and 84 controls, the prevalence of vertebral fractures and spinal bone mineral density (by quantitative computed tomography) were evaluated. Subjects were subdivided according to menopausal status into groups Pre (21 patients and 23 controls) and Post (49 patients and 61 controls); there were 14 and 35 patients without SH (SH(-)) and 7 and 14 patients with SH (SH(+)) in groups Pre and Post, respectively. The prevalence of fractures was higher in SH(+) than in controls and in SH(-) subjects in both groups Pre [SH(+), 42.9%; controls, 0% (P = 0.001); SH(-), 7.1% (P = 0.049)] and post [SH(+), 78.6%; controls, 37.7% (P = 0.006); SH(-) 42.9% (P = 0.024)]. In group Post, the mean z-score quantitative computed tomography values were lower in SH(+) patients (-0.78 +/- 0.29) than in controls (0.06 +/- 0.14; P = 0.011) and SH(-) patients (0.02 +/- 0.19; P = 0.034). Evaluation of spinal bone is indicated in female AI patients with SH.

Does subclinical hypercortisolism adversely affect the bone mineral density of patients with adrenal incidentalomas?

OBJECTIVE

Subclinical hypercortisolism (SH) is detected increasingly in a substantial proportion of patients with incidentally discovered adrenal adenomas. The clinical implications of SH are currently unclear. Osteoporosis is a well-known complication of glucocorticoid excess. So far, the impact of SH on bone mineral density (BMD) has been studied in a limited number of reports with discordant results. In the present study we evaluated the BMD in a large cohort of post-menopausal women with adrenal incidentalomas. : patients and measurements Forty-two post-menopausal women with incidentally discovered adrenal masses and radiological features highly suggestive of benign adrenal adenomas were investigated. All patients underwent a standard low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST; 0.5 mg 6-hourly for 2 days). The diagnosis of subclinical hypercortisolism (SH) was based on post-LDDST cortisol concentrations of > 70 nmol/l. According to this criterion patients were subdivided into two groups: with (n = 18; group A) or without (n = 24; group B) SH. There was no significant difference in age, years since menopause and body mass index between these groups. BMD was measured at L2-L4 vertebrae and three sites of the proximal femur by the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) method.

RESULTS

Post-menopausal women with SH (group A) exhibited slightly but significantly lower absolute and age-adjusted BMD values compared to group B patients in the femoral neck (BMD g/cm2: 0.72 +/- 0.08 vs. 0.79 +/- 0.09; Z-score: -0.20 +/- 0.82 vs. +0.43 +/- 0.94, P < 0.05) and trochanter (BMD g/cm2: 0.60 +/- 0.09 vs. 0.69 +/- 0.10; Z-score: -0.32 +/- 1.0 vs. +0.30 +/- 1.05, P < 0.01). BMD measurements of the Ward's triangle were also lower in group A patients but the difference did not reach statistical significance (BMD g/cm2: 0.60 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.68 +/- 0.13, P = 0.06). There was no difference in the lumbar vertebrae between the two groups (BMD g/cm2: 0.888 +/- 0.13 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.16, P = 0.78; z-score: +0.50 +/- 1.16 vs. +0.11 +/- 1.5, P = 0.36). The number of patients in the osteoporotic range was minimal with no significant difference between the two groups. However, the frequency of osteopenia in group A was significantly greater than in group B patients in the trochanter and Ward's triangle areas. Serum osteocalcin (BGP) levels were significantly lower in group A compared to group B patients (18.6 +/- 8.6 vs. 26.2 +/- 8.1 ng/ml, P < 0.01); no difference existed regarding parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations (43 +/- 15.6 vs. 41.2 +/- 14.8 pg/ml, P = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, post-menopausal women with subclinical hypercortisolism had lower absolute and age-adjusted BMD values and a higher rate of osteopaenia in the trabecular loaded and mixed cortical-trabecular bone of proximal femur. These data demonstrate that the subtle hypercortisolism of patients with adrenal incidentalomas may have an adverse effect on the bone mass of these patients.

Overnight dexamethasone suppression test: a reliable screen for Cushing's syndrome in the obese

OBJECTIVE

Reevaluation of the validity of the 1-mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (ODST) as a screening test for Cushing's syndrome in obese patients.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Eighty-six obese patients (body mass index, 30 to 53 kg/m(2)) that were referred to a general endocrine outpatient clinic for evaluation of simple obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, polycystic ovary disease, or pituitary tumor. One milligram dexamethasone was administered orally at 11:00 PM, and serum cortisol levels were measured the following morning between 8:00 AM and 9:00 AM. Suppression of serum cortisol to <80 nM (3 micro g/dL) was chosen as the cut-off point for normal suppression. Patients with serum cortisol levels > or =80 nM were evaluated for Cushing's syndrome.

RESULTS

Suppression of morning cortisol levels to <80 nM occurred in 79 of the 86 obese patients. Seven patients had serum cortisol levels higher than 80 nM; five were eventually diagnosed with Cushing's syndrome and two were considered false positive results in view of normal 24-hour free urinary cortisol and normal suppression on a low dose dexamethasone suppression test (0.5 mg of dexamethasone every 6 hours for 2 days). We found a false positive rate of 2.3% for the ODST using a cut-off serum cortisol of 80 nM.

DISCUSSION

The ODST is a valid screening test for Cushing's syndrome in the obese population. The false positive rate was 2.3%, even when using a strict cut-off serum cortisol of 80 nM. Abnormal cortisol suppression in obese patients should be investigated and not be considered false positive results.

Adrenocortical tumors: clinical symptoms and biochemical diagnosis

Patients who are suspected clinically to suffer from hypersecretory disorders of their adrenal(s) should undergo an appropriate endocrinological investigation to confirm or exclude the presence of such disorders prior to any radiological investigation. In those patients in whom an adrenal mass is found 'incidentally' on imaging clinical symptoms of hormonal activity should be carefully followed up. Asymptomatic patients should be screened biochemically for latent hormonal hypersecretion syndromes including pheochromocytoma (urine catecholamine excretion), hypercortisolism (overnight dexamethason suppression test) and aldosteronism (blood pressure and serum potassium). These investigations are mandatory in all patients scheduled for surgery. The decision to refer patients with inactive adrenal tumors to surgery is, in the absence of valid biochemical markers of malignancy, mainly influenced by tumor size but remains arbitrary. Patients who are not at first treated by surgery should be operated if follow-up indicates a progression in tumor size.

The adrenal incidentaloma: disease of modern technology and public health problem

The optimal strategy for evaluation of a patient with an incidentally discovered adrenal mass is unclear and remains controversial. A prospective multi-center randomized (or even non-randomized) trial would go a long way toward resolving the controversies. However, we lack such a study. Review of the literature supports the view that such patients are at somewhat increased risk of morbidity and mortality and this implies a benefit of early diagnosis for at least for some of the disorders. Our ability to accurately determine clinically those at increased risk among the vast majority who are not at increased risk is poor. We therefore rely on biochemical and radiological diagnostic tests, which have their own limitations. Subjecting patients to unnecessary testing and treatment carries its own set of risks. The diagnostic process itself may contribute considerable anxiety, expense, and if invasive cause pain and other morbidity. The harm that occurs as false positive results are pursued has been termed the "cascade effect" [34]. We must avoid the pitfalls of overestimation of disease prevalence and of the benefits of therapy resulting from advances in diagnostic imaging. In the meantime, we must use our best clinical judgement based upon the best available evidence to ensure that we maximize the benefit to those patients with AI who have clinically significant adrenal disorders and minimize the harm to those who do not.

Concurrent secretion of aldosterone and cortisol from an adrenal adenoma - value of MRI in diagnosis

A 43-year-old female with a 24-years history of hypertension presented for further investigation and management of primary hyperaldosternoism. Postural studies were not conclusive and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging demonstrated a 27 x 18 mm lesion of the right adrenal gland which showed no signal loss during in and out of phase imaging. Although these appearances were considered to be atypical of those seen on MR in patients with aldosterone producing adrenal adenomas the patient underwent an adrenalectomy with removal of a 3 x 3 x 2 cm right adrenal mass. Post-operatively she became hypotensive and a 0900 hours serum cortisol was undetectable (< 50 nmol/l), consistent with adrenal insufficiency. Following the administration of hydrocortisone there was normalization of the blood pressure and subsequent adrenal stimulation tests confirmed the presence of functioning adrenal tissue albeit with an inadequate response. Cortisol measurement from preoperative samples revealed loss of normal diurnal rhythm whereas DHEAS levels both pre and postoperatively were undetectable, consistent with ACTH supression resulting from autonomous cortisol secretion in addition to aldosterone. Concurrent secretion of cortisol should always be considered in Conn's adenomas particularly when atypical radiological features are present.

Adrenal incidentaloma

Incidentally discovered adrenal masses, or adrenal incidentalomas, have become a common clinical problem owing to wide application of radiologic imaging techniques. This definition encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum of pathologic entities, including primary adrenocortical and medullary tumors, benign or malignant lesions, hormonally active or inactive lesions, metastases, and infections. Once an adrenal mass is detected, the clinician needs to address two crucial questions: is the mass malignant, and is it hormonally active? This article provides an overview of the diagnostic clinical approach and management of the adrenal incidentaloma. Mass size is the most reliable variable to distinguish benign and malignant adrenal masses. Adrenalectomy should be recommended for masses greater than 4.0 cm because of the increased risk of malignancy. Adrenal scintigraphy has proved useful in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions. Finally, fine-needle aspiration biopsy is an important tool in the evaluation of oncological patients and it may be useful in establishing the presence of metastatic disease. The majority of adrenal incidentalomas are non-hypersecretory cortical adenomas but an endocrine evaluation can lead to the identification of a significant number of cases with subclinical Cushing's syndrome (5-15%), pheochromocytoma (1.5-13%) and aldosteronoma (0-7%). The first step of hormonal screening should include an overnight low dose dexamethasone suppression test, the measure of urinary catecholamines or metanephrines, serum potassium and, in hypertensive patients, upright plasma aldosterone/plasma renin activity ratio. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate measurement may show evidence of adrenal androgen excess.

Management approaches to adrenal incidentalomas. A view from Rochester, Minnesota

Two biproducts of the revolution in diagnostic imaging techniques are unintended discoveries, and uncertainty for the patient and the clinician. To address the uncertainty associated with adrenal incidentalomas, clinicians need to understand the definition, differential diagnosis, and options for assessment with respect to functional status and malignancy potential. This article presents an algorithmic approach that addresses these issues.

Management approaches to adrenal incidentalomas. A view from Ancona, Italy

The definition of adrenal incidentaloma encompasses a heterogeneous spectrum of pathologic entities, including primary adrenocortical and medullary tumors, benign or malignant lesions, hormonally active or inactive lesions, metastases, and infections. This article provides an overview of the diagnostic clinical approach and management of the incidentally discovered adrenal masses. Approaches are based on data collected in more than 1000 cases of the Collaborative Study Group on Adrenal Incidentaloma of the Italian Society of Endocrinology and the authors' experience.