Cephalometric evaluation of dento-skeletal changes during treatment with the Bionator type 1

Morphometric analysis of long-term dentoskeletal effects induced by treatment with Balters bionator

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effects of the standard (Class II) Balters bionator in growing patients with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion by using morphometrics (thin-plate spline [TPS] analysis).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-three Class II patients (8 male, 15 female) were treated consecutively with the Balters bionator (bionator group). The sample was evaluated at T0, start of treatment; T1, end of bionator therapy; and T2, long-term observation (including fixed appliances). Mean age at the start of treatment was 10 years 2 months (T0); at posttreatment, 12 years 3 months (T1); and at long-term follow-up, 18 years 2 months (T2). The control group consisted of 22 subjects (11 male, 11 female) with untreated Class II malocclusion. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed at the three time points for all groups. TPS analysis evaluated statistical differences (permutation tests) in the craniofacial shape and size between the bionator and control groups.

RESULTS

TPS analysis showed that treatment with the bionator is able to produce favorable mandibular shape changes (forward and downward displacement) that contribute significantly to the correction of the Class II dentoskeletal imbalance. These results are maintained at a long-term observation after completion of growth. The control group showed no statistically significant differences in the correction of Class II malocclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that bionator treatment of Class II malocclusion produces favorable results over the long term with a combination of skeletal and dentoalveolar shape changes.

Morphometric analysis of treatment effects of the Balters bionator in growing Class II patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of the standard (Class II) Balters bionator in growing patients with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion by using morphometrics (thin-plate spline [TPS] analysis).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one Class II patients (17 male and 14 female) were treated with the Balters bionator (bionator group). Mean age at the start of treatment (T0) was 10.3 years, while it was 13 years at the end of treatment (T1). Mean treatment time was 2 years and 2 months. The control group consisted of 22 subjects (14 male and 8 female) with untreated Class II malocclusion. Mean age at T0 was 10.2 years, while it was 12.2 years at T1. The observation period lasted 2 years on average. TPS analysis evaluated statistical (permutation tests) differences in the craniofacial shape and size between the bionator and control groups.

RESULTS

Through TPS analysis (deformation grids) the bionator group showed significant shape changes in the mandible that could be described as a mandibular forward and downward displacement. The control group showed no statistically significant differences in the correction of Class II malocclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Bionator appliance is able to induce significant mandibular shape changes that lead to the correction of Class II dentoskeletal disharmony.

Biomechanics of the mandible and growth extension

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

One way of determining the direction of growth of the mandible is to consider the temporomandibular joint and movement of the mandible as a four-joint gear system, regarding growth then as an extension of the gear system. Our aim was to examine any correlations between the type of biomechanical growth extension and change in the maxilomandibular relation after Class II therapy.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 130 lateral cephalograms-before and after orthodontic treatment-were available from 65 adolescent class II patients with open bite or deep bite. The two lateral cephalograms from each patient were superimposed on the occlusal plane. Cephalometric values and the vertical base point deviation were determined from biomechanical analyses, together with three distances and three angles.

RESULTS

No correlation between the cephalometric data and distances or angles were observed. Although there were no significant differences in the distances, we did note significant differences in all three angles (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

If gear system extension during growth is considered, this can be interpreted as meaning that the occlusal plane of those patients with an initially open bite dropped during treatment, but that it rose in patients with an initially deep bite.