Treatment of the axilla in early breast cancer: past, present and future

A prospective randomized trial comparing patent blue and methylene blue for the detection of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients

Introduction:

Methylene blue is more widely available and less expensive than patent blue, with an apparently lower risk of anaphylaxis.

Objective:

The two dyes were compared regarding detection of the sentinel lymph node (SLN).

Method:

A prospective, randomized trial involved 142 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Sixty-nine (49.3%) assigned to patent blue (group A) and 71 (50.70%) to methylene blue (group B). Thirty-five patients (25.0%) were clinical stage III or IV; 55 (38.7%) had axillary lymph nodes affected; and 69 (49.3%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Two patients were excluded because the dye type was not recorded.

Results:

Patients and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. SLNs were identified in 47 women (68.1%) in group A and 43 (60.6%) in group B (p=0.35). SLNs were affected in 22 cases (51.2%) in group A and 21 (48.8%) in group B (p=0.62). The SLN was the only node affected in 12 cases (54.5%) in group A and six (33.3%) in group B (p=0.18). The time and degree of difficulty involved in identifying the SLN were similar in both groups. There were no complications or allergies.

Conclusion:

Methylene blue performed as well as patent blue in identifying the SLN in breast cancer patients.

Disease recurrence in sentinel node-positive breast cancer patients forgoing axillary lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND

Clinically node-negative breast cancer patients usually undergo sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. When metastasis is identified, completion axillary lymph node dissection (CALND) is recommended. Newer data suggest that CALND may be omitted in some women as it does not improve local control or survival.

METHODS

Women with a positive SLN diagnosed between 1999 and 2010 were included in this review and were stratified according to whether they did or did not undergo CALND. Primary endpoints included recurrence and breast cancer-specific mortality. Differences between the groups and in time to recurrence were compared and summarized.

RESULTS

Overall, 276 women were included: 206 (79 %) women who underwent CALND (group 1) and 70 (21 %) women in whom CALND was omitted (group 2). Group 1 patients were younger, had more SLN disease, and received more chemotherapy (P < 0.05 for each). The groups did not vary by tumor characteristics (P > 0.05 for each). Median follow-up was 69 (range 6-147) and 73 (range 15-134) months for groups 1 and 2, respectively. Five (2 %) women in group 1 and three (4 %) women in group 2 died of breast cancer (P = 0.39). Local-regional or distant recurrence occurred in 20 (10 %) group 1 patients and in 10 (14 %) group 2 patients (P = 0.39). On multivariate analysis, only estrogen receptor negativity and lymphovascular invasion predicted for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Omission of CALND in women with SLN disease does not significantly impact in-breast, nodal, or distant recurrence or mortality. Longer-term follow-up is needed to verify that this remains true with time.

American Society of Breast Surgeons presidential address: could quality measures impede quality care?

Transparency and accountability are becoming more important, and publically reported quality measures will be used increasingly to determine how surgeons are viewed and reimbursed. That is a good thing if it is done correctly, but poorly designed quality measures might actually interfere with patient care. It will be necessary for ASBrS to remain involved in the development of relevant, true data-based measures of quality that have appropriate benchmarks and no unintended consequences. Importantly, the quality measures need to include all reasonable treatment options so that quality care is enhanced and not impeded.

Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of the axilla in breast cancer used to be an axillary lymph node dissection. An axillary lymph node dissection is known to give substantial risks of morbidity. In recent years the sentinel node biopsy has become common practice. Future randomized study results will determine whether the expected decrease in morbidity can be proven.

METHODS

Before the introduction of the sentinel node biopsy, we conducted a study in which 180 women of 50 years and older with T1/T2 cN0 breast cancer were treated with breast conserving therapy. Instead of an axillary lymph node dissection regional radiotherapy was given in combination with tamoxifen (RT-group). The study group was compared with 341 patients, with the same patient and tumour characteristics, treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (S-group).

RESULTS

The treatment groups were comparable, except for age. The RT-group was significantly older than the S-group. The median follow up was 7.2 years. The regional relapse rates were low and equal in both treatment groups, 1.1% in RT-group versus 1.5% in S-group at 5 years. The overall survival was similar; the disease free survival was significant better in the RT-group.

CONCLUSION

Regional recurrence rates after regional radiotherapy are very low and equal to an axillary lymphnode dissection.

The impact of the number of excised axillary nodes and of the percentage of involved nodes on regional nodal failure in patients treated by breast-conserving surgery with or without regional irradiation

PURPOSE

After breast-conserving surgery, recommendations for regional nodal radiotherapy are usually based on the number of positive nodes. This number is dependent on the number of nodes removed during the axillary dissection. This study examines whether the percentage of positive nodes may help to select patients for regional radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective study was conducted on 1,372 T1-T2 node-positive breast cancer patients treated at L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec Hospital between 1972 and 1997.

RESULTS

Among the patients who did not receive regional radiotherapy, the percentage of involved nodes was significantly associated with axillary failure. Ten-year axillary control rates were 97% and 91% when the percentage of involved nodes was <50% and > or =50%, respectively (p = 0.007). In addition, regional radiotherapy is always significantly associated with a decrease in overall regional failure (axillary and/or supraclavicular), regardless of the percentage of involved nodes. However, regional radiotherapy reduced the axillary failure rate (2% vs. 9%, p = 0.007) only when more than a specific percentage of nodes was involved (> or =40% if N1-3 and > or =50% if N>3 nodes).

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of involved nodes should be taken into consideration in selecting patients for regional radiotherapy. Irradiation of the axilla should be reserved for patients with a specific ratio: >40% involved nodes if N1-3 and > or =50% involved nodes if N>3 nodes.

Axillary lymph node clearance: overcoming the technical difficulties

BACKGROUND

Complete axillary clearance is recommended as part of the treatment in selected patients with invasive breast cancer. There are a number of potential technical difficulties in performing level III axillary clearance including: the deep and high position of level II and III nodes, their close proximity to the axillary vein, the difficulty in adjusting the operating light to illuminate the different levels of the axilla and the need for at least one assistant to perform the procedure.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate a new axillary clearance retractor, which is designed to overcome the technical difficulties in axillary clearance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The retractor was used for level III axillary clearance in 30 patients with invasive breast cancer either as part of total mastectomy (16 patients) or breast conservation surgery (14 patients). The retractor is table-based and provides simultaneous illumination to all levels of the axilla via light bundles. It has a long L-shaped component to retract the pectoral muscles and a self-retaining component to retract the skin edges. Assistants were not required in all patients. The details of the retractor and technique is described and literature reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 54 years (range 46-83) and the mean tumour size was 24.9 mm (range 11-70). The mean number of total lymph nodes removed was 19.4 nodes (range 11-50). The mean number of lymph nodes identified in level III dissection was 2.4 nodes (range 0-8). Six patients developed axillary seroma, which was treated by aspiration.

CONCLUSION

The axillary clearance retractor can be used with ease and without complications. It helps to overcome the technical difficulties in this operation.

Patients with recurrent breast cancer: does the primary axillary lymph node status predict more aggressive tumor progression?

BACKGROUND

The extent of axillary lymph node involvement represents the foremost important prognostic parameter in primary breast cancer, and, thus, is one of the main determinants for subsequent systemic treatment. Nevertheless, the relevance of the initial axillary lymph node status on survival after disease recurrence is discussed controversially. Persisting prognostic impact after relapse would identify lymph node status as a marker for tumor biology, in contrast to a simply time-dependent phenomenon.

METHOD

Retrospective analysis of 813 patients with locoregional or distant recurrence of primary breast cancer, who were primarily diagnosed with their disease at the I. Frauenklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, and the University Hospital in Berlin-Charlottenburg, Germany, between 1963 and 2000. To be eligible, patients were required to have been treated for resectable breast cancer free of distant disease at the time of primary diagnosis, and must have undergone systematic axillary lymph node dissection. Patients with unknown tumor size or nodal status were excluded from the study. All data were gathered contemporaneously and compared with original patients files, as well as the local cancer registry, ensuring high quality of data. The median observation time was 60 (standard deviation 44) months.

RESULTS

At time of primary diagnosis, 273 patients (33.6%) were node-negative, while axillary lymph node metastases were detected in 540 patients (66.4%). In univariate analysis tumor size, axillary lymph node status, histopathological grading, hormone receptor status, as well as peritumoral lymphangiosis and haemangiosis carcinomatosa were significantly correlated with survival after relapse (all, P < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the median survival time after relapse in node-negative patients to be 42 months (31-52 months, 95% CI), and 20 months in patients with 1-3 axillary lymph node metastases (16-24 months, 95% CI), compared to 13 months in patients with at least 4 involved axillary nodes (12-15 months, 95% CI). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, allowing for tumor size, axillary lymph node status, histopathological grading, presence of lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, relapse site and disease-free interval confirmed all parameters, except of histopathological grading (P = 0.14), as significant, independent risk factors for cancer associated death. Subgroup analyses, accounting for site of relapse and duration of disease-free interval, confirmed primary lymph node status as independent predictor for cancer-associated death after relapse.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node involvement at primary diagnosis of breast cancer patients predicts an unfavorable outcome after first recurrence, independently of the site of relapse and disease-free interval. These observations support the hypothesis that primary lymph node involvement is not a merely time-dependent indicator for tumor progression, but indicates tumors with aggressive biological behavior.