Is the left ventricular lateral wall the best lead implantation site for cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the MORE-CRT MPP trial

AIMS

To assess the impact of MultiPoint™ Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) non-responders after 6 months of standard biventricular pacing (BiVP).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The trial enrolled 5850 patients who planned to receive a CRT device. The echocardiography core laboratory assessed CRT response before implant and after 6 months of BiVP; non-response to BiVP was defined as <15% relative reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). Echocardiographic non-responders were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive MPP (541 patients) or continued BiVP (570 patients) for an additional 6 months and evaluated the conversion rate to the echocardiographic response. The characteristics of both groups at randomization were comparable. The percentage of non-responder patients who became responders to CRT therapy was 29.4% in the MPP arm and 30.4% in the BIVP arm (P = 0.743). In patients with ≥30 mm spacing between the two left ventricular pacing sites (MPP-AS), identified during the first phase as a potential beneficial subgroup, no significant difference in the conversion rate was observed.

CONCLUSION

Our trial shows that ∼30% of patients, who do not respond to CRT in the first 6 months, experience significant reverse remodelling in the following 6 months. This finding suggests that CRT benefit may be delayed or slowly incremental in a relevant proportion of patients and that the percentage of CRT responders may be higher than what has been described in short-/middle-term studies. MultiPoint™ Pacing does not improve CRT response in non-responders to BiVP, even with MPP-AS.

Merits of Different Ventricular Lead Locations on Left Ventricular Myocardial Strain and Dyssynchrony in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

The idea behind cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is to pace both ventricles resulting in a synchronized electro-mechanical coupling of the left ventricle (LV), meaning every effort should be made to improve the percentage of CRT responders.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed at demonstrating the short-term effect of right ventricular apical (RVA) and mid-septal (RVS) lead locations combined with different LV lead positions on LV myocardial strain, dyssynchrony, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We examined 60 patients with indication for CRT before and after 6 months of implantation for clinical outcome and CRT response (6-min walk test [6MWT], NYHA class, decrease in left ventricular end systolic volume [LVESV] by >15%), dyssynchrony, and myocardial strain.

RESULTS

After 6 months of follow-up, the two RV lead locations represented a significant improvement in 6MWT, left ventricular ejection fraction, and LVESV in comparison to baseline values, but no significant difference was found between both groups. With regards to NYHA class improvement, p values were insignificant between the groups (0.44 and 0.88) at baseline and 6 months after implantation, respectively. The mean 6MWT was 273.8 m in the RVA group compared to 279.0 m in the RVS group (p = 0.84) at baseline. After 6 months of CRT implantation, the 6MWT mean was 326.5 m in the RVA group compared to 316.2 m in the RVS group (p = 0.74). The posterolateral cardiac vein site showed a significant improvement when combined with RVS location in interventricular and intraventricular dyssynchrony, global longitudinal strain, global circumferential strain, and apical circumferential strain (p = 0.01 0.032, 0.02, 0.005, and 0.049), respectively.

CONCLUSION

RVS is not inferior and provides a good alternative to RVA pacing in short-term follow-up. However, the QRS duration, myocardial strain, and dyssynchrony varies depending on RV and LV stimulation sites. Long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes according to LV lead location in coronary sinus need more assessment.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy non-responder to responder conversion rate in the more response to cardiac resynchronization therapy with MultiPoint Pacing (MORE-CRT MPP) study: results from Phase I

Aims

To assess the impact of MultiPoint™ Pacing (MPP)—programmed according to the physician’s discretion—in non-responders to standard biventricular pacing after 6 months.

Methods and results

The study enrolled 1921 patients receiving a quadripolar cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) system capable of MPP™ therapy. A core laboratory assessed echocardiography at baseline and 6 months and defined volumetric non-response to biventricular pacing as <15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). Clinical sites randomized patients classified as non-responders in a 1:1 ratio to receive MPP (236 patients) or continued biventricular pacing (231 patients) for an additional 6 months and evaluated rate of conversion to echocardiographic response. Baseline characteristics of both groups were comparable. No difference was observed in non-responder to responder conversion rate between MPP and biventricular pacing (31.8% and 33.8%, P = 0.72). In the MPP arm, 68 (29%) patients received MPP programmed with a wide LV electrode anatomical separation (≥30 mm) and shortest LV1–LV2 and LV2–RV timing delays (MPP-AS); 168 (71%) patients received MPP programmed with other settings (MPP-Other). MPP-AS elicited a significantly higher non-responder conversion rate compared to MPP-Other (45.6% vs. 26.2%, P = 0.006) and a trend in a higher conversion rate compared to biventricular pacing (45.6% vs. 33.8%, P = 0.10).

Conclusions

After 6 months, investigator-discretionary MPP programming did not significantly increase echocardiographic response compared to biventricular pacing in CRT non-responders.

Long-Term Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Using Apical Versus Nonapical Left Ventricular Pacing

Background Experimental evidence indicates that left ventricular ( LV ) apical pacing is hemodynamically superior to nonapical LV pacing. Some studies have shown that an LV apical lead position is unfavorable in cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to determine whether an apical LV lead position influences cardiac mortality after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Methods and Results In this retrospective observational study, the primary end point of cardiac mortality was assessed in relation to longitudinal (basal, midventricular, or apical) and circumferential (anterior, lateral, or posterior) LV lead positions, as well as right ventricular (apical or septal), assigned using fluoroscopy. Lead positions were assessed in 1189 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation over 15 years. After a median follow-up of 6.0 years (interquartile range: 4.4-7.7 years), an apical LV lead position was associated with lower cardiac mortality than a nonapical position (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.99) after covariate adjustment. There were no differences in total mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Death from pump failure was lower with apical than nonapical positions (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.94). Compared with a basal position, an apical LV position was also associated with lower risk of sudden cardiac death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.93). No differences emerged between circumferential LV lead positions or right ventricular positions with respect to any end point. Conclusions In recipients of cardiac resynchronization therapy, an apical LV lead position was associated with better long-term cardiac survival than a nonapical position. This effect was due to a lower risk of pump failure and sudden cardiac death.

Optimal left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in postmyocardial infarction patients

AIM

To evaluate at a 12-month follow-up, the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in postmyocardial infarction (MI) heart failure patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation.

MATERIALS & METHODS

A total of 100 patients received a CRT device, and the study population was divided into three groups, according to the site of MI and left ventricular (LV) lead placed downstream of the ischemic area, as evaluated by echocardiography.

RESULTS

At the end of the 12-month follow-up, we reported a general improvement of LV ejection fraction from 28 ± 7% to 35 ± 9% (p < 0.001) and a significant reverse remodeling: LV end-systolic volume changed from 147 ± 54 to 125 ± 63 (p = 0.001) with a 53% of echocardiographic responders. We also observed 67% of CRT responders in the group with optimal LV lead placement compared with 38% in the remaining population (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The optimal positioning of LV lead is a feasible method to improve the percentage of CRT responders in post-MI heart failure patients.

New insights from a computational model on the relation between pacing site and CRT response

AIMS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) produces clinical benefits in chronic heart failure patients with left bundle-branch block (LBBB). The position of the pacing site on the left ventricle (LV) is considered an important determinant of CRT response, but the mechanism how the LV pacing site determines CRT response is not completely understood. The objective of this study is to investigate the relation between LV pacing site during biventricular (BiV) pacing and cardiac function.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used a finite element model of BiV electromechanics. Cardiac function, assessed as LV dp/dt_max and stroke work, was evaluated during normal electrical activation, typical LBBB, fascicular blocks and BiV pacing with different LV pacing sites. The model replicated clinical observations such as increase of LV dp/dt_max and stroke work, and the disappearance of a septal flash during BiV pacing. The largest hemodynamic response was achieved when BiV pacing led to best resynchronization of LV electrical activation but this did not coincide with reduction in total BiV activation time (∼ QRS duration). Maximum response was achieved when pacing the mid-basal lateral wall and this was close to the latest activated region during intrinsic activation in the typical LBBB, but not in the fascicular block simulations.

CONCLUSIONS

In these model simulations, the best cardiac function was obtained when pacing the mid-basal LV lateral wall, because of fastest recruitment of LV activation. This study illustrates how computer modeling can shed new light on optimizing pacing therapies for CRT. The results from this study may help to design new clinical studies to further investigate the importance of the pacing site for CRT response.

The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Randomized, controlled trials have shown that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in patients with heart failure, impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function, and a wide QRS complex. Other studies have shown that targeting the LV pacing site can also improve patient outcomes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a radiation-free imaging modality that provides unparalleled spatial resolution. In addition, emerging data suggest that targeted LV lead deployment over viable myocardium improves the outcome of patients undergoing CRT. This review explores the role of CMR in the preoperative workup of patients undergoing CRT.

The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Randomized, controlled trials have shown that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is beneficial in patients with heart failure, impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function, and a wide QRS complex. Other studies have shown that targeting the LV pacing site can also improve patient outcomes. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a radiation-free imaging modality that provides unparalleled spatial resolution. In addition, emerging data suggest that targeted LV lead deployment over viable myocardium improves the outcome of patients undergoing CRT. This review explores the role of CMR in the preoperative workup of patients undergoing CRT.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator Treatment in a Child with Heart Failure and Ventricular Arrhythmia

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a new treatment for refractory heart failure. However, most patients with heart failure treated with CRT are adults, middle-aged or older with idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We treated a 12-year-old boy, who was transferred after cardiac arrest, with dilated cardiomyopathy, left bundle-branch block, and ventricular tachycardia. We performed cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D). After CRT-D, left ventricular ejection fraction improved from 22% to 44% assessed by echocardiogram 1 year postoperatively. On electrocardiogram, QRS duration was shortened from 206 to 144 ms. The patient’s clinical symptoms also improved. For pediatric patients with refractory heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia, CRT-D could be indicated as an effective therapeutic option.

Relationship Between Changes in Pulse Pressure and Frequency Domain Components of Heart Rate Variability During Short-Term Left Ventricular Pacing in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background

The aim of the study was to explore the relationship between changes in pulse pressure (PP) and frequency domain heart rate variability (HRV) components caused by left ventricular pacing in patients with implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Material/Methods

Forty patients (mean age 63±8.5 years) with chronic heart failure (CHF) and implanted CRT were enrolled in the study. The simultaneous 5-minute recording of beat-to-beat arterial systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) by Finometer and standard electrocardiogram with CRT switched off (CRT/0) and left ventricular pacing (CRT/LV) was performed. PP (PP=SBP-DBP) and low- and high-frequency (LF and HF) HRV components were calculated, and the relationship between these parameters was analyzed.

Results

Short-term CRT/LV in comparison to CRT/0 caused a statistically significant increase in the values of PP (P<0.05), LF (P<0.05), and HF (P<0.05). A statistically significant correlation between ΔPP and ΔHF (R=0.7384, P<0.05) was observed. The ΔHF of 6 ms² during short-term CRT/LV predicted a PP increase of ≥10% with 84.21% sensitivity and 85.71% specificity.

Conclusions

During short-term left ventricular pacing in patients with CRT, a significant correlation between ΔPP and ΔHF was observed. ΔHF ≥6 ms² may serve as a tool in the selection of a suitable site for placement of a left ventricular lead.

Presence of extensive LV remodeling limits the benefits of CRT in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether, in patients with evidence of both electrical and mechanical left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, extensive LV dilation would affect response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is effective in heart failure patients with LV dysfunction and wide QRS complex. However, many patients still fail to respond. We hypothesized that presence of extensive LV dilation might prevent response to CRT, despite LV mechanical dyssynchrony.

METHODS

We studied 78 heart failure patients (68 ± 9 years of age, 77% men) with both electrical (QRS width >120 ms) and mechanical intraventricular dyssynchrony (by tissue Doppler imaging and/or left lateral wall post-systolic contraction). Echocardiographic evaluation was performed at baseline and 6 to 8 months after CRT. As an indication of LV remodeling, end-diastolic volume index and end-systolic volume index (ESVI) and sphericity index were measured. Long-term (40 ± 23 months) clinical follow-up (events: cardiac death and hospital admission for heart failure) was also obtained.

RESULTS

At follow-up after CRT, in the overall population, ejection fraction increased from 26 ± 6% to 35 ± 11% (p < 0.0001), whereas end-diastolic volume index (from 144 ± 43 ml/m(2) to 119 ± 55 ml/m(2)), ESVI (from 108 ± 37 ml/m(2) to 82 ± 49 ml/m(2), p < 0.0001 for both), and sphericity index (from 0.60 ± 0.22 to 0.53 ± 0.15, p = 0.0036) all significantly decreased. By multiple linear regression analysis, after controlling for confounding factors, change in LV ejection fraction at follow-up resulted independently and negatively associated with baseline ESVI (p = 0.001), with much lower improvement after implant in the highest tertile of baseline ESVI. During follow-up, 31 patients (39.7%) had a cardiac event. By Cox regression model, baseline ESVI was the most powerful predictor of events, with event-rate/year increasing with increasing tertiles of ESVI (6.3%, 10.1%, and 23.8%, respectively, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nonrandomized, open-label clinical study, despite intraventricular electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony, extensive LV remodeling at baseline negatively impacted CRT results in terms of LV function improvement and incidence of cardiac events at follow-up.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for patients with symptomatic heart failure, severely impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and a wide (> 120 ms) complex. As with any other treatment, the response to CRT is variable. The degree of pre-implant mechanical dyssynchrony, scar burden and scar localization to the vicinity of the LV pacing stimulus are known to influence response and outcome. In addition to its recognized role in the assessment of LV structure and function as well as myocardial scar, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can be used to quantify global and regional LV dyssynchrony. This review focuses on the role of CMR in the assessment of patients undergoing CRT, with emphasis on risk stratification and LV lead deployment.

Optimal left ventricular lead position assessed with phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the relationship between the site of latest mechanical activation as assessed with gated myocardial perfusion SPECT (GMPS), left ventricular (LV) lead position and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

METHODS

The patient population consisted of consecutive patients with advanced heart failure in whom CRT was currently indicated. Before implantation, 2-D echocardiography and GMPS were performed. The echocardiography was performed to assess LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). The site of latest mechanical activation was assessed by phase analysis of GMPS studies and related to LV lead position on fluoroscopy. Echocardiography was repeated after 6 months of CRT. CRT response was defined as a decrease of ≥15% in LVESV.

RESULTS

Enrolled in the study were 90 patients (72% men, 67±10 years) with advanced heart failure. In 52 patients (58%), the LV lead was positioned at the site of latest mechanical activation (concordant), and in 38 patients (42%) the LV lead was positioned outside the site of latest mechanical activation (discordant). CRT response was significantly more often documented in patients with a concordant LV lead position than in patients with a discordant LV lead position (79% vs. 26%, p<0.01). After 6 months, patients with a concordant LV lead position showed significant improvement in LVEF, LVESV and LVEDV (p<0.05), whereas patients with a discordant LV lead position showed no significant improvement in these variables.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a concordant LV lead position showed significant improvement in LV volumes and LV systolic function, whereas patients with a discordant LV lead position showed no significant improvements.

Correlation of body mass index and responder status in heart failure patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy: Does the obesity paradox exist?

Aims: We investigated the influence of body mass index (BMI) on the prevalence of responder status in chronic heart failure patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods: Data on 169 patients with resynchronization therapy were analyzed. Patients were categorized on the basis of the BMI measured at device implantation according to the WHO classification, as normal (BMI: 18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI: 25–29.9 kg/m2) or obese (BMI:≥30 kg/m2). Patients were considered responders if left ventricular ejection fraction was increased by at least 5% at 6-month follow-up.

Results: The mean age in the study population was 60.9±10.86 years (females 29%). The BMI subgroups did not exhibit any significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction or NYHA class). Elevated BMIs were associated with higher prevalence of responder status (overweight: 71.4%, obese: 63.0%) relative to subjects with a normal BMI (44.7%) (p=0.015).

Conclusions: In this CRT population, overweight status was associated with a more favorable response to CRT, indicating that the response may possibly be influenced by factors other than those directly related to the heart status or the technical details of the CRT.

Effects of left ventricular lead positions and coronary venous microanatomy on cardiac pacing parameters

We describe effects of pacing lead position and cardiac microanatomy on electrical pacing parameters. Passive fixation transvenous pacing leads were implanted in anterior interventricular veins in isolated swine hearts (n = 6). Electrical pacing parameters were measured in 3 implant positions (5 implant sites each): touching myocardial side of venous wall, not touching venous wall, and touching epicardial side of venous wall. After perfusion fixing hearts, veins were sectioned perpendicular to vein's length from base to apex. Slides were prepared and analyzed for measurement of vein wall thickness/circumference, and distances between vein walls and myocardium. Average pacing thresholds were greater when pacing leads were free-floating (5.45 +/- 3.29 V) or oriented in epicardial positions (6.81 +/- 2.96 V) compared with myocardial positions (3.79 +/- 3.46 V; P = not significant). Vein circumferences were significantly larger in basal regions (8.31 +/- 2.28 mm) compared with mid (6.90 +/- 1.46 mm) and apical (6.40 +/- 1.92 mm) regions (P < .05). Variability in pacing thresholds and impedances indicates that pacing lead placement in left ventricular coronary veins significantly affects electrical pacing parameters.

[Optimal electrode placement. What to consider during implantation of a biventricular pacemaker?]

Since the introduction of transvenous left ventricular lead systems nearly a decade ago, resynchronization therapy has gained widespread acceptance and has become a growing field in heart failure therapy. Due to the increasing numbers of implanting centers and physicians, the need for adequate education is increasing. This article describes and illustrates the anatomical background, the technical opportunities and pitfalls, which have to be overcome, to achieve an implanting success rate of 95% to 98%, as can be achieved by well-trained physicians under optimal conditions.

Influence of left ventricular lead location on outcomes in the COMPANION study

INTRODUCTION

There are no randomized controlled trial data that evaluate mortality and hospitalization rates in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients based on left ventricular (LV) lead location. We analyzed the event-driven outcomes of mortality and hospitalization as well as functional outcomes including Functional Class, Quality-of-Life, and 6-minute walk distance in 1,520 patients enrolled in the COMPANION study of CRT versus optimal medical therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Over a mean follow-up after implantation of 16.2 months, patients randomized to CRT, regardless of lead location, experienced benefit compared with optimized pharmacologic therapy (OPT), with respect to all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization. All but a posterior location showed benefit with respect to the all-cause mortality or all-cause hospitalization outcome. Mortality benefit in CRT-D patients was indifferent to LV lead position. All functional outcomes including 6-minute walk distance, Quality-of-Life (QOL) and Functional Class improved with CRT, regardless of LV lead location.

CONCLUSION

LV lead location was not a major determinant of multiple measures of response to CRT therapy in the COMPANION Trial. While acute data indicate that a left lateral LV lead location results in the most favorable hemodynamic response, these chronic data suggest that positioning an LV lead in an anterior rather than a lateral or posterior LV location has similar benefit.

Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study was to evaluate echocardiographic parameters after 6 months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as long-term outcome in patients with the left ventricular (LV) lead positioned at the site of latest activation (concordant LV lead position) as compared with that seen in patients with a discordant LV lead position.

BACKGROUND

A nonoptimal LV pacing lead position may be a potential cause for nonresponse to CRT.

METHODS

The site of latest mechanical activation was determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis and related to the LV lead position on chest X-ray in 244 CRT candidates. Echocardiographic evaluation was performed after 6 months. Long-term follow-up included all-cause mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure.

RESULTS

Significant LV reverse remodeling (reduction in LV end-systolic volume from 189 +/- 83 ml to 134 +/- 71 ml, p < 0.001) was noted in the group of patients with a concordant LV lead position (n = 153, 63%), whereas patients with a discordant lead position showed no significant improvements. In addition, during long-term follow-up (32 +/- 16 months), less events (combined for heart failure hospitalizations and death) were reported in patients with a concordant LV lead position. Moreover, a concordant LV lead position appeared to be an independent predictor of hospitalization-free survival after long-term CRT (hazard ratio: 0.22, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Pacing at the site of latest mechanical activation, as determined by speckle tracking radial strain analysis, resulted in superior echocardiographic response after 6 months of CRT and better prognosis during long-term follow-up.

Dual-site left ventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy

Simultaneous stimulation of 2 left ventricular (LV) sites could enhance the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute hemodynamic response to dual-site LV CRT. Two LV pacing leads were successfully implanted in 12 CRT candidates (New York Heart Association classes III to IV, QRS >or=120 ms). Target positions were the lateral or posterolateral vein (site A) and anterior or anterolateral vein (site B). A conductance catheter was placed in the left ventricle for pressure-volume measurements. Tested CRT configurations were alternated by atrial overdrive pacing at a fixed rate and included site A and B single-site CRT and dual-site LV CRT (2 LV sites plus right ventricular apex) at 4 atrioventricular intervals. Overall, single-site LV CRT significantly enhanced stroke volume, stroke work, maximum pressure derivative, and conductance-derived indexes of LV synchrony when delivered in site A, whereas no significant changes were noticed with pacing in site B. Specifically, site-A pacing resulted in a higher stroke volume increase (LV pacing site associated with the best hemodynamic response [best-LV]) in 8 patients, and site-B pacing, in 4 patients. At intermediate atrioventricular intervals, dual-site LV CRT resulted in improved stroke volume, stroke work, maximum pressure derivative, and LV synchrony with respect to single-site CRT when delivered at the best-LV (all p <0.05). However, single-site CRT at best-LV produced results similar to dual-site LV CRT when the atrioventricular interval was optimized in each patient. In conclusion, adding a second LV lead does not result in further improvement in acute hemodynamic response with respect to standard CRT when the single LV pacing site and atrioventricular interval are optimal.

Efficacy of LOw-dose DObutamine stress-echocardiography to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy response (LODO-CRT) multicenter prospective study: design and rationale

BACKGROUND

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has a well-demonstrated therapeutic effect in selected patients with advanced heart failure on optimized drug therapy, nonresponder rate remains high. The LODO-CRT is designed to improve patient selection for CRT. Design and rationale of this study are presented herein.

METHODS

LODO-CRT is a multicenter prospective study, started in late 2006, that enrolls patients with conventional indications for CRT (symptomatic stable New York Heart Association class III-IV on optimized drug therapy, QRS > or =120 milliseconds, left ventricular [LV] dilatation, LV ejection fraction < or =35%). This study is designed to assess the predictive value of LV contractile reserve (LVCR), determined through dobutamine stress echocardiography (defined as an LV ejection fraction increase >5 units), in predicting CRT response during follow-up. Assessment of CRT effects will follow 2 sequential phases: in phase 1, CRT response end point is defined as LV end-systolic volume reduction > or =10% at 6 months; in phase 2, both LV end-systolic volume reduction and clinical status via a clinical composite score will be evaluated at 12 months follow-up. Predictive value of LVCR will be compared to other measures, such as LV dyssynchrony measures, through adjusted multivariable analysis. For the purpose of the study, target patient number is 270 (with 95% confidence, 80% power, alpha < or = .05). Enrollment should be complete by the end of 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

The LODO-CRT trial is testing the hypothesis that LVCR assessment, using low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography test, should effectively predict positive response to CRT both in terms of the reverse remodeling process as well as favorable long-term clinical outcome. Moreover, the predictive value of LVCR will be compared to that of conventional intra-LV dyssynchrony measures.

Contemporary pacemakers: what the primary care physician needs to know

Pacemaker therapy is most commonly initiated because of symptomatic bradycardia, usually resulting from sinus node disease. Randomized multicenter trials assessing the relative benefits of different pacing modes have made possible an evidence-based approach to the treatment of bradyarrhythmias. During the past several decades, major advances in technology and in our understanding of cardiac pathophysiology have led to the development of new pacing techniques for the treatment of heart failure in the absence of bradycardia. Left ventricular or biventricular pacing may improve symptoms of heart failure and objective measurements of left ventricular systolic dysfunction by resynchronizing cardiac contraction. However, emerging clinical data suggest that long-term right ventricular apical pacing may have harmful effects. As the complexity of cardiac pacing devices continues to grow, physicians need to have a basic understanding of device indications, device function, and common problems encountered by patients with devices in the medical and home environment.

Potential uses of computed tomography for management of heart failure patients with dyssynchrony

Cardiac resynchronization therapy has become an integral part in the step-care approach to manage patients with heart failure. Cardiac imaging remains central to appropriate patient selection and optimal left ventricular lead placement, both of which are important determinants of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. One of the biggest limitations with current imaging modalities is the inability of a single technique to address each, the anatomic (venous anatomy), mechanical (dyssynchrony), and structural (extent of scar location) issues accompanying cardiomyopathy. We present here the potential concept of using cardiac computed tomography as a single modality to acquire functional and anatomic information, and also to show the possibility of integrating this with real time fluoroscopy.

The interaction of interventricular pacing intervals and left ventricular lead position during temporary biventricular pacing evaluated by tissue Doppler imaging

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of interventricular pacing interval and left ventricular (LV) pacing site on ventricular dyssynchrony and function at baseline and during biventricular pacing, using tissue Doppler imaging.

METHODS

Using an angioplasty wire to pace the left ventricle, 20 patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block underwent temporary biventricular pacing from lateral (n = 20) and inferior (n = 10) LV sites at five interventricular pacing intervals: +80, +40, synchronous, -40, and -80 ms.

RESULTS

LV ejection fraction (EF) increased (mean (SD) from 18 (8)% to 26 (10)% (p = 0.016) and global mechanical dyssynchrony decreased from 187 (91) ms to 97 (63) ms (p = 0.0004) with synchronous biventricular pacing compared to unpaced baseline. Sequential pacing with LV preactivation produced incremental improvements in EF and global mechanical dyssynchrony (p<0.0001 and p = 0.0026, respectively), primarily as a result of reductions in inter-LV-RV dyssynchrony (p = 0.0001) rather than intra-LV dyssynchrony (NS). Results of biventricular pacing from an inferior or lateral LV site were comparable (for example, synchronous biventricular pacing, global mechanical dyssynchrony: lateral LV site, 97 (63) ms; inferior LV site, 104 (41) ms (NS); EF: lateral LV site, 26 (10)%; inferior LV site, 27 (10)% (NS)). ECG morphology was identical during biventricular pacing through an angioplasty wire and a permanent lead.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential biventricular pacing with LV preactivation most often optimises LV synchrony and EF. An inferior LV site offers a good alternative to a lateral site. Pacing through an angioplasty wire may be useful in assessing the acute effects of pacing.

Does RV lead positioning provide additional benefit to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with advanced heart failure?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The left ventricular (LV) stimulation site is currently recommended to position the lead at the lateral wall. However, little is known as to whether right ventricular (RV) lead positioning is also important for cardiac resynchronization therapy. This study compared the acute hemodynamic response to biventricular pacing (BiV) at two different RV stimulation sites: RV high septum (RVHS) and RV apex (RVA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using micro-manometer-tipped catheter, LV pressure was measured during BiV pacing at RV (RVA or RVHS) and LV free wall in 33 patients. Changes in LV dP/dt(max) and dP/dt(min) from baseline were compared between RVA and RVHS. BiV pacing increased dP/dt(max) by 30.3 +/- 1.2% in RVHS and by 33.3 +/- 1.7% in RVA (P = n.s.), and decreased dP/dt(min) by 11.4 +/- 0.7% in RVHS and by 13.0 +/- 1.0% in RVA (P = n.s.). To explore the optimal combination of RV and LV stimulation sites, we assessed separately the role of RV positioning with LV pacing at anterolateral (AL), lateral (LAT), or posterolateral (PL) segment. When the LV was paced at AL or LAT, the increase in dP/dt(max) with RVHS pacing was smaller than that with RVA pacing (AL: 12.2 +/- 2.2% vs 19.3 +/- 2.1%, P < 0.05; LAT: 22.0 +/- 2.7% vs 28.5 +/- 2.2%, P < 0.05). There was no difference in dP/dt(min) between RVHS- and RVA pacing in individual LV segments.

CONCLUSIONS

RVHS stimulation has no overall advantage as an alternative stimulation site for RVA during BiV pacing. RVHS was equivalent with RVA in combination with the PL LV site, while RVA was superior to RVHS in combination with AL or LAT LV site.

Relation of left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy to left ventricular reverse remodeling and to diastolic dyssynchrony

The effects of left ventricular (LV) lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on LV remodeling and dyssynchrony are not well defined. Sixty-one patients (age 60 +/- 11 years, 76% men) were evaluated by echocardiography before and 4 +/- 2 months after CRT and grouped by the LV lead placement (lateral, posterolateral, or anterolateral). Echocardiographic measurements included LV volumes and LV ejection fraction. Tissue Doppler imaging was used to assess for inter- and intraventricular systolic and diastolic dyssynchrony. Analysis of variance was used to determine the effect of the LV lead placement on echocardiographic variables after CRT. The LV lead was placed in a lateral cardiac vein in 33 patients (54%), posterolateral in 15 (25%), and anterior in 13 (21%). Lateral LV lead placement was associated with significantly smaller LV volumes compared with the posterolateral lead placement (p <0.01). Diastolic dyssynchrony improved significantly with lateral lead placement compared with the anterior lead location (p <0.05). Improvement in LV ejection fraction and inter- and intraventricular systolic dyssynchrony was similar among the 3 groups. In conclusion, in patients undergoing CRT, a lateral lead location resulted in greater reverse LV remodeling and improved diastolic dyssynchrony compared with other lead placement locations.

Tissue synchronization imaging and optimal left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy

The optimal pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains controversial. Tissue synchronization imaging is a novel echocardiographic technique that color-codes for areas of maximal delay in myocardial velocities. This study aimed to identify whether the left ventricular (LV) pacing lead position in CRT should be guided by a patient's area of maximal mechanical delay. Fifty-four patients with advanced heart failure were assessed echocardiographically before and 6 months after CRT. Response was analyzed according to the relation between the LV lead position and the area of maximal delay to peak velocity by tissue synchronization imaging in the first half of the ejection phase: group 1 (n = 22) had lead placement corresponding to the segment of maximal delay; group 2 (n = 13) had lead placement 1 segment adjacent; and group 3 (n = 19) had lead placement remote from this site. Evidence of LV reverse remodeling and improved systolic function was documented in group 1 (mean percentage decrease in end-systolic volume 23%) more than in group 2 (mean decrease 15%), and more than in group 3 (mean increase 8.9%, p <0.0001 compared with groups 1 and 2). In group 1, 16 of 22 patients had reverse remodeling (>15% decrease in end-systolic volume); reverse remodeling was seen in 7 of 13 patients in group 2 and 1 of 19 in group 3. The placing of the lead position proximal to the site of maximal delay by tissue synchronization imaging was correlated with reverse remodeling (r = 0.449, p = 001). Of 7 patients with delay confined to the septum and anterior wall only, none had evidence of reverse remodeling after CRT. In conclusion, pacing at the site of maximal mechanical delay was associated with reverse remodeling. Individually tailored LV lead positioning should be considered before CRT.

Prospective validation of stress echocardiography as an identifier of cardiac resynchronization therapy responders

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) provides benefit for congestive heart failure (CHF), but predictors of the clinical response are debated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the predictive role of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in identifying a suitable candidate for CRT.

METHODS

From March 2001 to December 2003, 71 CHF patients were prospectively enrolled on the basis of four criteria: New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV; QRS > or =150 ms with a left bundle branch block pattern, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or =35% under optimal medical treatment. The combined endpoints were hospital readmission for class IV CHF, heart transplant (HT), and CHF-related death.

RESULTS

The 67 patients completing the study presented with the following characteristics: age (70 +/- 10 years; 11 women); etiology (idiopathic in 44, ischemic in 23); NYHA class (40 in class III and 27 in class IV); LVEF 26% (+/-5%); QRS duration (190 +/- 28 ms); 6-minute walk test 330 m (+/-108); peak oxygen uptake 10.7 (+/-3.3 mL/kg/min); mitral insufficiency in 42 (> or =III grade); interventricular (IV) delay (62 +/- 21 ms); and intraventricular dyssynchrony in 30 patients. Over the follow-up period of 12.1 +/- 8.7 months, 20 (29.9%) of 67 patients presented with at least one hemodynamic event: hospitalization for CHF in 19 (28%) of 67, HT in 2 (3%) of 67, and CHF death in 7 (10%) 67. Univariate analysis identified NYHA class (P = .03), LVEF (P = .015), IV dyssynchrony before (P = .038) and after CRT (P = .0035), IV delay after CRT (P = .002), 6-minute walk distance (P = .01), and DSE Res+ (P = .008) as significant predictors of clinical events. A receiver operating curve established a cut-off value of 1.25 for the DSE responders (Res+: 34 patients at 10 microg/kg/min infusion rates), and the improvement at the 10 microg/kg/min level was 41% +/- 7% in Res+ and 29% +/- 8% in nonresponders (P<.0001). With a cut-off value of 1.25-fold the LVEF increase, the DSE test exhibits 70% sensitivity, 61.7% specificity, 43.8% positive predictive value, and 82.9% negative predictive value. Cox analysis identified IV dyssynchrony before CRT (P = .01) and DSE Res+ (P = .003) as independent predictive factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Independent predictive factors of severe hemodynamic clinical outcome in patients with CRT are IV dyssynchrony and DSE.

Ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony and resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a new indication for Fourier analysis of gated blood-pool radionuclide ventriculography

In patients with decreased left ventricular ejection fraction and conduction disease, ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony has been demonstrated. To date, resynchronization by biventricular pacing is increasingly used since it improves ventricular function and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. To optimize and evaluate the effect of resynchronization therapy and to identify patients who may benefit from biventricular pacing the assessment of left ventricular synchronicity is essential. Therefore, a non-invasive and reproducible technique to obtain information on ventricular synchrony is clinically valuable. In this review, the technical background and the role of phase analysis of gated blood-pool nuclear ventriculography in the assessment of ventricular mechanical synchrony, especially in heart failure patients subjected to biventricular pacing, will be discussed.