1
|
Gómez Rivas J, Fernandez L, Abad-Lopez P, Moreno-Sierra J. Androgen deprivation therapy in localized prostate cancer. Current status and future trends. Actas Urol Esp 2023; 47:398-407. [PMID: 37667894 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer (PCa) has been recognized as an androgen-sensitive disease since the investigations from Huggins and Hodges in 1941. Thanks to these findings, they received the Nobel Prize in 1966. This was the beginning of the development of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as treatment for patients with PCa. OBJECTIVE To summarize the current indications of ADT in localized PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We conducted a comprehensive English and Spanish language literature research, focused on the main indications for ADT in localized PCa. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Nowadays, the indications for ADT as monotherapy in localized PCa have been limited to specific situations, to patients unwilling or unable to receive any form of local treatment if they have a PSA-DT < 12 months, and either a PSA > 50 ng/mL, a poorly differentiated tumor, or troublesome local disease-related symptoms. ADT can be used in combination with local treatment in different scenarios. Although neoadjuvant treatment with ADT prior to surgery with curative intent has no clear oncological impact, as a future sight, PCa is a heterogeneous disease, and there could be a group of patients with high-risk localized disease that could benefit. CONCLUSIONS We need to optimize the treatment with ADT in localized PCa, selecting the patients accordingly to their disease characteristics. Given that the therapeutic armamentarium evolves day by day, there is a need for the development of new clinical trials, as well as a molecular studies of patients to identify those who might benefit from an early multimodal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Gómez Rivas
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Salud, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
| | - L Fernandez
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Abad-Lopez
- Departamento de Urología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Moreno-Sierra
- Instituto de Salud, Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Morphologic Features and Predictive Parameters of Therapy Response. Adv Anat Pathol 2022; 29:252-258. [PMID: 35670702 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
The primary goals of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) in prostate cancer (PCa) are to reduce the size of the tumor, lower positive surgical margin rate, attempt to reach pathologic remission, and improve survival. Although NHT has not been recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as a primary treatment option for patients with localized PCa, NHT is increasingly used in clinical trials for locally advanced PCa. More importantly, with the development of novel androgen signaling inhibitors, such as abiraterone and enzalutamide, there has been renewed interests in revisiting the role of such treatment in the neoadjuvant setting. Following NHT, the PCa tissues shows characteristic morphologic alterations. Of note, the collapse of malignant glands most likely leads to an artificial increase of Gleason score in the residual disease. Communicating these changes to the clinician in a way that can help assess the tumor's response poses a challenge for pathologists. In addition, little is known of morphologic features and predictive makers both in pretreated and posttreated specimens that can be of value in predicting tumor response to NHT. In the current review, we summarize the morphologic changes associated with neoadjuvant-treated PCa, focusing on the predictive value of pathologic parameters to therapy response. We also describe the evaluation system in the stratification of pathologic response to NHT in PCa management.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ge Q, Xu H, Yue D, Fan Z, Chen Z, Xu J, Zhou Y, Zhang S, Xue J, Shen B, Wei Z. Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy in Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:906370. [PMID: 35646683 PMCID: PMC9130750 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.906370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) on patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy (RP) and attempt to provide meaningful evidence. Methods A systematic search was performed using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases in February 2022 based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The relevant studies were critically screened and we extracted the data of demography, postoperative pathology, and survival to calculate the pooled effect sizes. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Results Six identified studies involving 1717 subjects were included according to the selection criteria. There was no significant difference between NCHT plus RP and RP alone groups regarding lymph node involvement (risk ratio [RR]=1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-1.87, P=0.92). However, NCHT prior to RP significantly decreased the rates of positive surgical margin (PSM, RR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.22-0.55, P<0.0001) and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI, RR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.95, P=0.01), and increase pathological downstaging (RR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.17-2.29, P=0.004). Additionally, biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly prolonged under the administration of NCHT (HR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.85, P=0.008 and HR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94, P=0.02, respectively). Conclusions Compared to the RP alone group, patients with NCHT plus RP showed significant improvements in PSM, SVI, pathological downstaging, BRFS, and OS, whereas further multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to consolidate this concept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyu Ge
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hewei Xu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Dezhou Yue
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zongyao Fan
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhengsen Chen
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Xu
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yiduo Zhou
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Sicong Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Xue
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Baixin Shen
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zhongqing Wei
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,Department of Urology, The Second Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gómez Rivas J, Fernández L, Abad-López P, Moreno-Sierra J. Terapia de privación de andrógenos en el cáncer de próstata localizado. Situación actual y tendencias futuras. Actas Urol Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
5
|
Katayama S, Mori K, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Schuettfort VM, Quhal F, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Aydh A, König F, Mathieu R, Nyirady P, Karakiewicz PI, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Comparison of short-term and long-term neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol 2022; 56:85-93. [PMID: 35142251 DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2034941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of long-term neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) before radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS We conducted meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, which included randomized controlled trials that assessed patients with prostate cancer (PC) who received either short-term (<6 months) or long-term (≥6 months) neoadjuvant ADT before RP. RESULTS Thirteen articles with 2778 patients were eligible for analysis. Short-term neoadjuvant ADT was neither associated with biochemical recurrence (OR 1.19, 95% CI, 0.93-1.51, p = 0.17), metastasis (OR 0.73, 95% CI, 0.45-1.19, p = 0.21), nor overall mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.21, p = 0.22); no study investigated survival outcomes in patients on long-term neoadjuvant ADT. In terms of pathologic outcomes, long-term neoadjuvant ADT was significantly associated with a reduced risk of positive surgical margin (SM) and an increased rate of organ-confined disease (OCD) compared to short-term neoadjuvant ADT (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.39-0.80, p = 0.001, and OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-1.99, p = 0.009, respectively). These findings were confirmed in the network meta-analyses. Meanwhile, only a non-significant trend favoring long-term neoadjuvant ADT was observed for pathologic complete response (OR 1.98, 95% Crl 1.00-3.93). CONCLUSION Long-term neoadjuvant ADT was associated with more favorable pathologic outcomes, but whether these findings translate into favorable survival outcomes still remains unproven due to very limited evidence. Since there are no reliable survival data, long-term neoadjuvant ADT before RP should not be used in clinical practice until more robust evidence arises from ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Peter Nyirady
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, Canada
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pechlivanis M, Campbell BK, Hovens CM, Corcoran NM. Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation in Localised Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010166. [PMID: 35008330 PMCID: PMC8750084 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in men. Attempts to improve patient outcomes include trials of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for patients with high-risk disease. Neoadjuvant treatment refers to androgen deprivation therapy that is administered prior to surgery (or radiation therapy). Patients typically respond well to this treatment regimen, showing a decrease in tumour size, but a significant proportion of patients eventually relapse and progress to metastatic disease. The mechanisms driving this resistance to neoadjuvant treatment are currently unknown. This review explores theories of resistance broadly, and their possible applications in the prostate cancer setting. Additionally, this review draws comparisons between breakthrough resistance and neoadjuvant resistance, and lastly investigates the current biomarkers for treatment sensitivity. Abstract Prostate cancer (PCa) is a hormone driven cancer, characterised by defects in androgen receptor signalling which drive the disease process. As such, androgen targeted therapies have been the mainstay for PCa treatment for over 70 years. High-risk PCa presents unique therapeutic challenges, namely in minimising the primary tumour, and eliminating any undetected micro metastases. Trials of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy aim to address these challenges. Patients typically respond well to neoadjuvant treatment, showing regression of the primary tumour and negative surgical margins at the time of resection, however the majority of patients relapse and progress to metastatic disease. The mechanisms affording this resistance are largely unknown. This commentary attempts to explore theories of resistance more broadly, namely, clonal evolution, cancer stem cells, cell persistence, and drug tolerance. Moreover, it aims to explore the application of these theories in the PCa setting. This commentary also highlights the distinction between castration resistant PCa, and neoadjuvant resistant disease, and identifies the markers and characteristics of neoadjuvant resistant disease presented by current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maree Pechlivanis
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; (B.K.C.); (C.M.H.); (N.M.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-3-9342-7294; Fax: +61-3-9342-8928
| | - Bethany K. Campbell
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; (B.K.C.); (C.M.H.); (N.M.C.)
| | - Christopher M. Hovens
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; (B.K.C.); (C.M.H.); (N.M.C.)
| | - Niall M. Corcoran
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia; (B.K.C.); (C.M.H.); (N.M.C.)
- Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia
- Department of Urology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia
- Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:739-762. [PMID: 34526701 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00514-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with curative intent are at an increased risk of biochemical recurrence, metastatic progression and cancer-related death compared with patients treated for low-risk or intermediate-risk disease. Thus, these patients often need multimodal therapy to achieve complete disease control. Over the past two decades, multiple studies on the use of neoadjuvant treatment have been performed using conventional androgen deprivation therapy, which comprises luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists and/or first-line anti-androgens. However, despite results from these studies demonstrating a reduction in positive surgical margins and tumour volume, no benefit has been observed in hard oncological end points, such as cancer-related death. The introduction of potent androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs), such as abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide, has led to a renewed interest in using neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in high-risk prostate cancer. The addition of ARSIs to androgen deprivation therapy has demonstrated substantial survival benefits in the metastatic castration-resistant, non-metastatic castration-resistant and metastatic hormone-sensitive settings. Intuitively, a similar survival effect can be expected when applying ARSIs as a neoadjuvant strategy in high-risk prostate cancer. Most studies on neoadjuvant ARSIs use a pathological end point as a surrogate for long-term oncological outcome. However, no consensus yet exists regarding the ideal definition of pathological response following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and pathologists might encounter difficulties in determining pathological response in hormonally treated prostate specimens. The neoadjuvant setting also provides opportunities to gain insight into resistance mechanisms against neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and, consequently, to guide personalized therapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ryu JH, Kim YB, Jung TY, Ko WJ, Kim SI, Kwon D, Kim DY, Oh TH, Yoo TK. Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review. J Korean Med Sci 2021; 36:e256. [PMID: 34697927 PMCID: PMC8546307 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no clear consensus on the optimal treatment with curative intent for patients with positive surgical margins (PSMs) following radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions and treatment patterns of Korean urologists regarding the resection margin after RP. METHODS A preliminary questionnaire was prepared by analyzing various studies on resection margins after RP. Eight experienced urologists finalized the 10-item questionnaire. In July 2019, the final questionnaire was delivered via e-mail to 105 urologists in Korea who specialize in urinary cancers. RESULTS We received replies from 91 of the 105 urologists (86.7%) in our sample population. Among them, 41 respondents (45.1%) had performed more than 300 RPs and 22 (24.2%) had completed 500 or more RPs. In the question about whether they usually performed an additional biopsy beyond the main specimen, to get information about surgical margin invasion during surgery, the main opinion was that if no residual cancer was suspected, it was not performed (74.7%). For PSMs, the Gleason score of the positive site (49.5%) was judged to be a more important prognostic factor than the margin location (18.7%), multifocality (14.3%), or margin length (17.6%). In cases with PSMs after surgery, the prevailing opinion on follow-up was to measure and monitor prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels rather than to begin immediate treatment (68.1%). Many respondents said that they considered postoperative radiologic examinations when PSA was elevated (72.2%), rather than regularly (24.4%). When patients had PSMs without extracapsular extension (pT2R1) or a negative surgical margin with extracapsular extension (pT3aR0), the response 'does not make a difference in treatment policy' prevailed at 65.9%. Even in patients at high risk of PSMs on preoperative radiologic screening, 84.6% of the respondents said that they did not perform neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Most respondents (75.8%) indicated that they avoided nerve-sparing RP in cases with a high risk of PSMs, but 25.7% said that they had tried nerve-sparing surgery. Additional analyses showed that urologists who had performed 300 or more prostatectomies tended to attempt more nerve-sparing procedures in patients with a high risk of PSMs than less experienced surgeons (36.6% vs. 14.0%; P = 0.012). CONCLUSION The most common response was to monitor PSA levels without recommending any additional treatment when PSMs were found after RP. Through this questionnaire, we found that the perceptions and treatment patterns of Korean urologists differed considerably according to RP resection margin status. Refined research and standard practice guidelines are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Hyun Ryu
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun Beom Kim
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Young Jung
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Jin Ko
- Department of Urology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sun Il Kim
- Department of Urology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Dongdeuk Kwon
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Duk Yoon Kim
- Department of Urology, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Tae Hee Oh
- Department of Urology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Tag Keun Yoo
- Department of Urology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Effects of Delayed Radical Prostatectomy and Active Surveillance on Localised Prostate Cancer-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133274. [PMID: 34208888 PMCID: PMC8268689 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We reviewed the evidence available for postponing or delaying cancer surgery for localised prostate cancer. Watchful waiting is an acceptable option in low-risk patients. Evidence is uncertain in postponing surgery, but conservative estimates suggest delays of over 5 months, 4 months, and 30 days for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively, can lead to worse survival outcomes. Neoadjuvant therapy can shrink the tumours prior to surgery and can be a useful adjunct in delaying surgery for, at the most, 3 months. Abstract External factors, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), can lead to cancellations and backlogs of cancer surgeries. The effects of these delays are unclear. This study summarised the evidence surrounding expectant management, delay radical prostatectomy (RP), and neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) compared to immediate RP. MEDLINE and EMBASE was searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled studies pertaining to the review question. Risks of biases (RoB) were evaluated using the RoB 2.0 tool and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A total of 57 studies were included. Meta-analysis of four RCTs found overall survival and cancer-specific survival were significantly worsened amongst intermediate-risk patients undergoing active monitoring, observation, or watchful waiting but not in low- and high-risk patients. Evidence from 33 observational studies comparing delayed RP and immediate RP is contradictory. However, conservative estimates of delays over 5 months, 4 months, and 30 days for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients, respectively, have been associated with significantly worse pathological and oncological outcomes in individual studies. In 11 RCTs, a 3-month course of NHT has been shown to improve pathological outcomes in most patients, but its effect on oncological outcomes is apparently limited.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer benefit from multimodality therapy of curative intent. Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation improves survival in this population. However, prior clinical trials of neoadjuvant ADT and surgery failed to consistently demonstrate a survival advantage. The development of novel, more potent hormonal agents presents an opportunity to revisit the potential for neoadjuvant therapy to improve long-term outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer. We review recent advances in neoadjuvant approaches for prostate cancer and emerging clinical trials data supporting the use of neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang L, Zhao H, Wu B, Zha Z, Yuan J, Feng Y. The Impact of Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy on Surgical and Oncological Outcomes for Patients With Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 10:615801. [PMID: 33628732 PMCID: PMC7897693 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.615801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This systematic study aimed to assess and compare the comprehensive evidence regarding the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) on surgical and oncological outcomes of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Literature searches were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases, we identified relevant studies published before July 2020. The pooled effect sizes were calculated in terms of the odds ratios (ORs)/standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the fixed or random-effects model. Results We identified 22 clinical trials (6 randomized and 16 cohort) including 20,199 patients with PCa. Our meta-analysis showed no significant differences in body mass index (SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.08-0.29, p = 0.274) and biopsy Gleason score (GS) (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.76-2.35 p = 0.321) between the two groups. However, the NHT group had a higher mean age (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07-0.31, p = 0.001), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.19-0.75, p = 0.001), and clinic tumor stage (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.53-3.29, p < 0.001). Compared to the RP group, the NHT group had lower positive surgical margins (PSMs) rate (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.67, p < 0.001) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26-0.83, p = 0.009). Between both groups, there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss (SMD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.24-0.13, p = 0.556), operation time (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: -0.12-0.51, p = 0.219), pathological tumor stage (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54-1.06, p = 0.104), specimen GS (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.49-1.68, p = 0.756), and lymph node involvement (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.40-1.45, p = 0.404). Conclusions NHT prior to RP appeared to reduce the tumor stage, PSMs rate, and risk of BCR in patients with PCa. According to our data, NHT may be more suitable for older patients with higher tumor stage. Besides, NHT may not increase the surgical difficulty of RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Hu Zhao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Zhenlei Zha
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Jun Yuan
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Yejun Feng
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nayak AL, Flaman AS, Mallick R, Lavallée LT, Fergusson DA, Cagiannos I, Morash C, Breau RH. Do androgen-directed therapies improve outcomes in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 2021; 15:269-279. [PMID: 33443481 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Approximately 50% of patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer are treated with radical prostatectomy (RP). While some men will be cured with surgery alone, a substantial proportion will experience cancer recurrence. Androgen-directed therapy (ADT) is an effective adjuvant therapy for patients treated with prostate radiation. Comparatively, the efficacy of ADT in surgical patients has not been well-studied. METHODS A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to July 2020 was performed. Randomized trials comparing ADT with RP vs. prostatectomy alone in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were included. Neoadjuvant ADT and adjuvant ADT interventions were assessed separately. The primary outcomes were cancer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Pathological outcomes following neoadjuvant ADT were also evaluated. RESULTS Fifteen randomized trials met eligibility criteria; 11 evaluated neoadjuvant ADT (n=2322) and four evaluated adjuvant ADT (n=5205). Neoadjuvant ADT (three months of treatment) did not improve RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.11) or OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.62-2.41). Neoadjuvant ADT significantly decreased the risk of positive surgical margins (relative risk [RR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.41-0.56) and extraprostatic tumor extension (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89). Adjuvant ADT improved RFS (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.93) but did not improve OS (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84-1.24). CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant ADT causes a pathological downstaging of prostate tumors but has not been found to delay cancer recurrence nor extend survival. Few studies have evaluated adjuvant ADT. Trials are needed to determine the benefits and harms of intermediate- or long-term adjuvant ADT for RP patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ameeta L Nayak
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Ranjeeta Mallick
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Luke T Lavallée
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Dean A Fergusson
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Ilias Cagiannos
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Chris Morash
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rodney H Breau
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xia L, Talwar R, Chelluri RR, Guzzo TJ, Lee DJ. Surgical Delay and Pathological Outcomes for Clinically Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2028320. [PMID: 33289846 PMCID: PMC7724561 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE There is a lack of data evaluating the association of surgical delay time (SDT) with outcomes in patients with localized, high-risk prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association of SDT of radical prostatectomy and final pathological and survival outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study used data from the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) and identified all patients with clinically localized (cT1-2cN0cM0) high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 who underwent radical prostatectomy. Data analyses were performed from April 1 to April 12, 2020. EXPOSURES SDT was defined as the number of days between the initial cancer diagnosis and radical prostatectomy. SDT was categorized into 5 groups: 31 to 60, 61 to 90, 91 to 120, 121 to 150, and 151 to 180 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were predetermined as adverse pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy, including pT3-T4 disease, pN-positive disease, and positive surgical margin. The adverse pathological score (APS) was defined as an accumulated score of the 3 outcomes (0-3). An APS of 2 or higher was considered a separate outcome to capture cases with more aggressive pathological features. The secondary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS Of the 32 184 patients included in the study, the median (interquartile range) age was 64 (59-68) years, and 25 548 (79.4%) were non-Hispanic White. Compared with an SDT of 31 to 60 days, longer SDTs were not associated with higher risks of having any adverse pathological outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80-1.12; P = .53), pT3-T4 disease (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83-1.17; P = .87), pN-positive disease (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.59-1.06; P = .12), positive surgical margin (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.74-1.05; P = .17), or APS greater than or equal to 2 (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74-1.05; P = .17). Longer SDT was also not associated with worse overall survival (for SDT of 151-180 days, hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.79-1.59, P = .53). Subgroup analyses performed for patients with very high-risk disease (primary Gleason score 5) and sensitivity analyses with SDT considered as a continuous variable yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy within 180 days of diagnosis for high-risk prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer could be safely delayed up to 6 months after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilei Xia
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Ruchika Talwar
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Raju R. Chelluri
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Thomas J. Guzzo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
| | - Daniel J. Lee
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ashrafi AN, Yip W, Aron M. Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Indian J Urol 2020; 36:251-261. [PMID: 33376260 PMCID: PMC7759181 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_115_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with higher rates of biochemical recurrence, clinical recurrence, metastasis, and PCa-specific death, compared to low-and intermediate-risk disease. Herein, we review the various definitions of high-risk PCa, describe the rationale for neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical prostatectomy, and summarize the contemporary data on neoadjuvant therapies. Since the 1990s, several randomized trials of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have consistently demonstrated improved pathological parameters, specifically tumor downstaging and reduced extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive surgical margins without improvements in cancer-specific or overall survival. These studies, however, were not exclusive to high-risk patients and were limited by suboptimal follow-up periods. Newer studies of neoadjuvant ADT in high-risk PCa show promising pathological and oncological outcomes. Recent level 1 data suggests neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (CHT) may improve longer-term survival in high-risk PCa. Immunologic neoadjuvant trials are in their infancy, and further study is required. Neoadjuvant therapies may be promising additions to the multimodal therapeutic landscape of high-risk and locally advanced PCa in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akbar N. Ashrafi
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medical Center of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Division of Surgery, North Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Wesley Yip
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medical Center of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Monish Aron
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medical Center of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen MC, Kilday PS, Elliott PA, Artenstein D, Slezak J, Jacobsen SJ, Chien GW. Neoadjuvant Leuprolide Therapy with Radical Prostatectomy: Long-term Effects on Health-related Quality of Life. Eur Urol Focus 2020; 7:779-787. [PMID: 32165116 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant androgen ablation (neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy [NADT]) is used prior to radical prostatectomy, contrary to guidelines, but its long-term effects on quality of life is unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of NADT on patient's long-term recovery following surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From March 2011 to August 2013, 5808 men with newly diagnosed prostate were followed up to 24 mo. A cohort of men who received NADT prior to robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP; n=51) was compared 1:3 with a matched group that underwent RALP only (n=153). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Patients were matched on Charlson comorbidities, biopsy Gleason score, and node status on final pathology. The Kruskall-Wallis test was used to compare the groups on their bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal domains of the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo postoperatively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The urinary irritative, urinary incontinence, and bowel domains were similar in the two groups during the 24 mo (p=0.832, 0.901, and 0.732, respectively). In the hormonal domain, the NADT group did worse (p<0.001). The sexual domain was also worse for the NADT group. However, when accounting for nerve sparing, there was no significant difference in sexual outcomes between the two groups (p=0.069). CONCLUSIONS Patients who received NADT prior to RALP do not have worse sexual function, but have worse hormonal scores for up to 2yr after surgery. PATIENT SUMMARY Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) is administered prior to robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), contrary to clinical guidelines. NADT may not have worse sexual function outcomes up to 2yr after RALP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Chen
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Patrick S Kilday
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter A Elliott
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Artenstein
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jeff Slezak
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Steven J Jacobsen
- Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Gary W Chien
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The majority of patients with prostate cancer who later develop lethal metastatic disease have high-risk localized disease at presentation, emphasizing the importance of effective treatment strategies at this stage. Multimodal treatment approaches that combine systemic and local therapies offer a promising strategy for improving the clinical outcomes of patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. Combinations of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or chemohormonal therapy are considered to be the standard of care in most solid tumours and should be investigated in the future for the treatment of prostate cancer to improve patient outcomes. However, although the combination of androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy is a standard of care in high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer, the benefit of chemotherapy or chemohormonal therapy has yet to be demonstrated outside of the metastatic setting. Moreover, the benefit of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant systemic therapies in combination with radical prostatectomy has not been proved. The development of next-generation hormonal agents, which have been approved for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, offers further therapeutic possibilities that are being assessed in early-phase clinical trials.
Collapse
|
17
|
Ma BL, Yao L, Fan Y, Wang Y, Meng YS, Zhang Q, He ZS, Jin J, Zhou LQ. Short-term benefit of neoadjuvant hormone therapy in patients with localized high-risk or limited progressive prostate cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:4143-4151. [PMID: 31190986 PMCID: PMC6522651 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s196378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Radical surgery is the preferred method for local high-risk and limited progressive prostate cancer in the routine clinical setting. However, current guidelines do not recommend neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT). Opinions regarding NHT vary among individual clinicians. According to the experience gained at our center, we explored the benefits of NHT for patients with prostate cancer during the perioperative period in this study. Methods: In this retrospective study, we explored the perioperative benefits of NHT among 189 patients with local high-risk or limited progressive prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy and divided them into two groups: the NHT group and the non-NHT group. The NHT regimens were a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist alone (3.75/11.25 mg of leuprolide or 3.6/10.8 mg of goserelin acetate), an androgen receptor antagonist (ARA) alone, or a combination of the two. The duration of treatment was <3 months, 3 to 6 months, or >6 months. Results: We found that NHT could reduce the surgery time and intraoperative hemorrhage, thus reducing the difficulty of surgery; NHT could also improve the postoperative recovery of patients. However, it did not reduce the stage of prostate cancer or positive surgical margin rate. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy is optional for some patients. We believe that NHT will improve the overall prognosis of patients as progress continues in the medical field in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing-Lei Ma
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lin Yao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Fan
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yi-Sen Meng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Song He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jie Jin
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li-Qun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (male), Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Koshkin VS, Mir MC, Barata P, Gul A, Gupta R, Stephenson AJ, Kaouk J, Berglund R, Magi-Galluzzi C, Klein EA, Dreicer R, Garcia JA. Randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant everolimus in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. Invest New Drugs 2019; 37:559-566. [PMID: 31037562 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00778-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite definitive local therapy, patients with high-risk prostate cancer have a significant risk for local and distant failure. To date, no systemic therapy given prior to surgery has been shown to improve outcomes. The phosphatidilinositol 3-kinase/AKT/mTOR pathway is commonly dysregulated in men with prostate cancer. We sought to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of the mTOR/TORC1 inhibitor everolimus in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Methods This is a randomized phase II study of everolimus at two different doses (5 and 10 mg daily) given orally for 8 weeks before radical prostatectomy in men with high-risk prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was the pathologic response (histologic P0, margin status, extraprostatic extension) and surgical outcomes. Secondary endpoints included changes in serum PSA level and treatment effects on levels of expression of mTOR, p4EBP1, pS6 and pAKT. Results Seventeen patients were enrolled: nine at 10 mg dose and eight at 5 mg dose. No pathologic complete responses were observed and the majority of patients (88%) had an increase in their PSA values leading to this study being terminated early due to lack of clinical efficacy. Treatment-related adverse events were similar to those previously reported with the use of everolimus in other solid tumors and no additional surgical complications were observed. A significant decrease in the expression of p4EBP1 was noted in prostatectomy samples following treatment. Conclusions Neoadjuvant everolimus given at 5 mg or 10 mg daily for 8 weeks prior to radical prostatectomy did not impact pathologic responses and surgical outcomes of patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Trial registration NCT00526591 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim S Koshkin
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria C Mir
- Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Anita Gul
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Urology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ruby Gupta
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Urology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew J Stephenson
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Urology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Urology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ryan Berglund
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Urology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Eric A Klein
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Urology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Jorge A Garcia
- Department of Solid Tumor Oncology and Urology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gunnarsson O, Schelin S, Brudin L, Carlsson S, Damber JE. Triple treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. A matched cohort study with up to 19 years follow-up comparing survival outcomes after triple treatment and treatment with hormones and radiotherapy. Scand J Urol 2019; 53:102-108. [DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1600580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stefan Carlsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Section of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan-Erik Damber
- Sahlgrenska Academy and University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
He K, Hu H, Ye S, Wang H, Cui R, Yi L. The effect of metformin therapy on incidence and prognosis in prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2019; 9:2218. [PMID: 30778081 PMCID: PMC6379374 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38285-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The relationship between metformin and prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial. To clarify this association, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched from their inception dates to May 23, 2018, using the keywords "metformin" and "prostate cancer" to identify the related studies. The results included incidence, overall survival (OS), PCa-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), which were measured as hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) using Review Manager 5.3 software. A total of 30 cohort studies, including 1,660,795 patients were included in this study. Our study revealed that metformin treatment improves OS, CSS and RFS in PCa (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.88, P = 0.001; HR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64-0.94, P = 0.009; and HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87 P = 0.006, respectively) compared with non-metformin treatment. However, metformin usage did not reduce the incidence of PCa (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.55-1.34, P = 0.51). In conclusion, compared with non-metformin treatment, metformin therapy can significantly improve OS, CSS and RFS in PCa patients. No association was noted between metformin therapy and PCa incidence. This study indicates a useful direction for the clinical treatment of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kancheng He
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Huating Hu
- The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410007, China
| | - Senlin Ye
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Haohui Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China
| | - Rongrong Cui
- Institute of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
| | - Lu Yi
- Department of Urology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
McClintock TR, von Landenberg N, Cole AP, Lipsitz SR, Gild P, Sun M, Fletcher SA, Roghmann F, Menon M, Nguyen PL, Noldus J, Choueiri TK, Kibel AS, Trinh QD. Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy Prior to Radical Prostatectomy: Recent Trends in Utilization and Association with Postoperative Surgical Margin Status. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 26:297-305. [PMID: 30430324 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-7035-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we sought to describe the contemporary trends in utilization of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). As a secondary endpoint, we assessed the community-level effect of neoadjuvant ADT on positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2014), we identified patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCa) [cT1-4N0M0] treated with RP. The estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) mixed linear regression methodology was used for temporal trend analysis of neoadjuvant ADT. Observed differences in baseline characteristics between patients treated with neoadjuvant ADT versus those who were not were then controlled for using an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach. IPTW-adjusted analyses were then performed to examine the odds of positive surgical margins. RESULTS Overall, 8184 (2.12%) and 377,843 (97.88%) individuals with PCa were treated with neoadjuvant ADT prior to RP versus RP only, respectively. There was a consistent trend in decreasing use of neoadjuvant ADT over time, with a nadir observed in 2011 [EAPC - 8.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 11.7 to - 4.32; p < 0.05]. In IPTW-adjusted analyses, the odds of positive surgical margins were lower in patients receiving neoadjuvant ADT with low-risk [odds ratio (OR) 0.65; 95% CI 0.51-0.84; p < 0.001] and intermediate-risk [OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.85; p < 0.001] PCa. CONCLUSIONS After a period of steady decline, there appears to be a modest trend towards increased utilization of neoadjuvant ADT in more recent years. We found an association between neoadjuvant ADT and decreased odds of positive surgical margins among low- and intermediate-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler R McClintock
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolas von Landenberg
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital Herne, Herne, Germany
| | - Alexander P Cole
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stuart R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Philipp Gild
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maxine Sun
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sean A Fletcher
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mani Menon
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Vattikuti Urology Institute (VUI) Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Akitake N, Shiota M, Obata H, Takeuchi A, Kashiwagi E, Imada K, Kiyoshima K, Inokuchi J, Tatsugami K, Eto M. Neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in association with age and serum testosterone. Prostate Int 2018; 6:104-109. [PMID: 30140660 PMCID: PMC6104286 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to identify the candidate prostate cancer patients suitable for neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 711 Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who were treated with RP between 2000 and 2013. Patients were treated with or without neoadjuvant ADT before RP. The prognostic significance of neoadjuvant ADT on biochemical recurrence (BCR) was analyzed according to various clinicopathological characteristics. RESULTS BCR occurred in 186 (26.2%) of 711 patients. The group treated with neoadjuvant ADT showed higher levels of prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis and advanced clinical T-stage, but suppressed pathological T-stage. Neoadjuvant ADT was not associated with the risk of BCR. In subgroup analysis, neoadjuvant ADT was significantly associated with increased BCR in patients aged >65 years [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 2.04 (1.13-3.43), P = 0.020]. Among the 53 patients with available serum testosterone levels, neoadjuvant ADT was associated with the risk of BCR according to serum testosterone levels. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that neoadjuvant ADT showed potential deleterious effects in older patients and patients with lower serum testosterone levels, while a possible improved prognosis in patients with high serum testosterone levels treated with neoadjuvant ADT was suggested, warranting further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kadono Y, Nohara T, Kawaguchi S, Sakamoto J, Makino T, Nakashima K, Iijima M, Shigehara K, Izumi K, Mizokami A. Changes in penile length after radical prostatectomy: effect of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Andrology 2018; 6:903-908. [PMID: 29968337 DOI: 10.1111/andr.12517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Revised: 05/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Although reports have shown evidence for penile length (PL) shortening after radical prostatectomy (RP), the association between neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) and PL after RP has yet to be determined. This study evaluates chronological changes in PL after NADT and RP. Stretched PLs (SPLs) of 143 patients, 41 of whom had undergone NADT, were measured before, 10 days after, and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after RP. Chronological erectile function and testosterone levels were then evaluated. SPL was shortest 10 days after RP in both the NADT (-) and NADT (+) groups and gradually recovered in length thereafter. SPL in the NADT (-) group was significantly longer than that in the NADT (+) group before RP. However, no significant differences in SPLs were found between both groups 6 months after RP. Although all subjects in the NADT (+) group had testosterone levels of <50 ng/dL before RP, such levels increased after RP. Before RP, the NADT (-) group was found to have significantly better erectile function than the NADT (+) group. However, differences in erectile function between the NADT (-) and NADT (+) groups after RP were not significant. This report is the first to show that among patients with prostate cancer, those who underwent NADT had greater PL recovery after RP than those who did not. Data regarding PL recovery after NADT and RP obtained in this study could be useful for patients with prostate cancer who plan to undergo such procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Kadono
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - T Nohara
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - S Kawaguchi
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - J Sakamoto
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - T Makino
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - K Nakashima
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - M Iijima
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - K Shigehara
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - K Izumi
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - A Mizokami
- Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hajili T, Ohlmann CH, Linxweiler J, Niklas C, Janssen M, Siemer S, Stoeckle M, Saar M. Radical prostatectomy in T4 prostate cancer after inductive androgen deprivation: results of a single-institution series with long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2018; 123:58-64. [PMID: 29772100 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the outcomes of complete surgical resection of T4 prostate cancer after inductive androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), as inductive ADT and subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) is not recommended by any guideline yet. PATIENTS AND METHODS A monocentric RP database was queried for patients initially diagnosed with T4 prostate cancer, considered primarily as inoperable because of a fixed mass defined by rectal examination in combination with high PSA level and/or large foci of biopsy confirmed undifferentiated prostate cancer. Treatment consisted of primary ADT until PSA nadir with consecutive RP. Patients underwent retropubic RP (RRP) or robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP) after inductive ADT until achievement of the PSA nadir, which is in general reached after 6-7 months. The intraoperative course and complications were analysed. Finally, Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS). RESULTS We retrospectively identified 116 patients treated between 2000 and 2014. At diagnosis, the median (range) PSA level was 37.6 (2.44-284) ng/mL. The preoperative median (range) PSA after inductive ADT was 0.73 (0.01-34) ng/mL. Thereafter, patients underwent RRP or, since 2006, RALP. The median (95% confidence interval) OS was 156 (118.9-193.1) months. The PCSS at 150 months was 82%. CONCLUSIONS Surgical therapy of primarily inoperable prostate cancer is feasible and safe after inductive ADT. The OS of this cohort seems comparable with results described for patients with primary operable high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Turkan Hajili
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Carsten H Ohlmann
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Johannes Linxweiler
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Christina Niklas
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Martin Janssen
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Stefan Siemer
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Michael Stoeckle
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Matthias Saar
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bandini M, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Preisser F, Dell'Oglio P, Zaffuto E, Stabile A, Gallina A, Suardi N, Shariat SF, Montorsi F, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment in high-risk prostate cancer. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2018; 11:425-438. [PMID: 29355037 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1429265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION High-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa) represents a heterogeneous disease with potential risk for local and distant progression. In these patients, a multi-modal approach consisting of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant systemic therapies has been proposed. The aim of this review is to summarize the emerging roles of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies in HRPCa patients. Areas covered: This review collects the most relevant phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the effect of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapies in combination with radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) for HRPCa patients. Specifically, the review examines the benefit provided by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), chemotherapy (CHT), and novel antiandrogen agents in this setting. A search of bibliographic databases for peer-reviewed literature was conducted. Expert commentary: Three decades of RCTs demonstrated that adjuvant ADT is fundamental in HRPCa treated with RT. Conversely, ADT and CHT did not improve the survival of HRPCa patients managed with RP. The recent introduction of novel antiandrogen agents combined with an appropriated selection of patients at risk of cancer progression, may ultimately extend the indication of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in surgical- and radio-treated patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bandini
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy.,c Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit , University of Montreal Health Center , Montreal , Quebec , Canada
| | - Nicola Fossati
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy
| | - Felix Preisser
- c Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit , University of Montreal Health Center , Montreal , Quebec , Canada.,d Department of Urology , Martini Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy
| | - Emanuele Zaffuto
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy
| | - Andrea Gallina
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy
| | - Nazareno Suardi
- b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy.,e Urology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute , Ville Turro Division , Milan , Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- f Department of Urology , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- c Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit , University of Montreal Health Center , Montreal , Quebec , Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- a Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , URI, IRCCS Hospital San Raffaele , Milan , Italy.,b Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology , Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
McKay RR, Montgomery B, Xie W, Zhang Z, Bubley GJ, Lin DW, Preston MA, Trinh QD, Chang P, Wagner AA, Mostaghel EA, Kantoff PW, Nelson PS, Kibel AS, Taplin ME. Post prostatectomy outcomes of patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant androgen blockade. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2017; 21:364-372. [PMID: 29263420 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-017-0009-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with high-risk prostate cancer have an increased likelihood of experiencing a relapse following radical prostatectomy (RP). We previously conducted three neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) trials prior to RP in unfavorable intermediate and high-risk disease. METHODS In this analysis, we report on the post-RP outcomes of a subset of patients enrolled on these studies. We conducted a pooled analysis of patients with available follow-up data treated on three neoadjuvant trials at three institutions. All patients received intense ADT prior to RP. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical recurrence (BCR). BCR was defined as a PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL or treatment with radiation or androgen-deprivation therapy for a rising PSA < 0.2 ng/mL. RESULTS Overall, 72 patients were included of whom the majority had a Gleason score ≥ 8 (n = 46, 63.9%). Following neoadjuvant therapy, 55.7% of patients (n = 39/70) had pT3 disease, 40% (n = 28) had seminal vesicle invasion, 12.9% (n = 9) had positive margins, and 11.4% (n = 8) had lymph node involvement. Overall, 11 (15.7%) had tumor measuring ≤ 0.5 cm, which included four patients (5.7%) with a pathologic complete response and seven (10.0%) with residual tumor measuring 0.1-0.5 cm. Compared to pretreatment clinical staging, 10 patients (14.3%) had pathologic T downstaging at RP. The median follow-up was 3.4 years. Overall, the 3-year BCR-free rate was 70% (95% CI 57%, 90%). Of the 15 patients with either residual tumor ≤ 0.5 cm or pathologic T downstaging, no patient experienced a recurrence. CONCLUSION In this exploratory pooled clinical trials analysis, we highlight that neoadjuvant therapy prior to RP in unfavorable intermediate and high-risk patients may potentially have a positive impact on recurrence rates. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy on pathologic and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rana R McKay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Bruce Montgomery
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zhenwei Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Glenn J Bubley
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Mark A Preston
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter Chang
- Department of Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew A Wagner
- Department of Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elahe A Mostaghel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Philip W Kantoff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter S Nelson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Dana Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mossanen M, Krasnow RE, Nguyen PL, Trinh QD, Preston M, Kibel AS. Approach to the Patient with High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2017; 44:635-645. [PMID: 29107279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Men classified as having high-risk prostate cancer warrant treatment because durable outcomes can be achieved. Judicious use of imaging and considerations of risk factors are essential when caring for men with high-risk disease. Radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, and androgen deprivation therapy all play pivotal roles in the management of men with high-risk disease, and potentially in men with metastatic disease. The optimal combinations of therapeutic regimens are an evolving area of study and future work looking into therapies for men with high-risk disease will remain critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Ross E Krasnow
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Quoc D Trinh
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mark Preston
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam S Kibel
- Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 45 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Docetaxel and mitoxantrone before radical prostatectomy in men with high-risk prostate cancer: 10-year follow-up and immune correlates. Anticancer Drugs 2017; 28:120-126. [PMID: 27669423 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The aims of this study were to report the clinical outcomes in a cohort of men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel and mitoxantrone 10 years after treatment, identify pretreatment clinical parameters that may be predictors of recurrence, and describe tumor-infiltrating leukocytes present in radical prostatectomy specimens. We conducted a phase I/II study of neoadjuvant docetaxel and mitoxantrone before radical prostatectomy in high-risk localized prostate cancer to determine the feasibility of this combination and predictors of prostate cancer recurrence after cytotoxic chemotherapy. After 10 years of follow-up, 34 (63%) of 54 participants experience a recurrence. In univariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (P=0.01), pathological stage (P=0.03), lymph node status (P<0.0001), seminal vesicle invasion (P=0.003), and tissue vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression (P=0.016) were significantly associated with recurrence. In multivariate analysis, only lymph node status, PSA density, and VEGF expression were significant predictors of disease recurrence. We used a tissue microarray for the first 50 participants to characterize the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and evaluate them for association with recurrence. We measured CD3, CD4, CD8, FoxP3, CD20, CD15, CD68, and CD163 by immunohistochemistry in both tumor and normal prostate specimens, but did not find an association between immunophenotype and recurrence. There was a significantly different density of CD68 and CD163 cells between normal and tumor tissue. Lymph node status, PSA density, and tissue VEGF expression predict recurrence after chemotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer. Additional studies are needed to determine the potential benefit of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Collapse
|
29
|
Kurbegovic S, Berg KD, Thomsen FB, Gruschy L, Iversen P, Brasso K, Røder MA. The risk of biochemical recurrence for intermediate-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Scand J Urol 2017; 51:450-456. [DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1356369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sorel Kurbegovic
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Kasper Drimer Berg
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Frederik Birkebæk Thomsen
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Lisa Gruschy
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Peter Iversen
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Klaus Brasso
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Martin Andreas Røder
- Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zang T, Taplin ME, Tamae D, Xie W, Mesaros C, Zhang Z, Bubley G, Montgomery B, Balk SP, Mostaghel EA, Blair IA, Penning TM. Testicular vs adrenal sources of hydroxy-androgens in prostate cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 2017; 24:393-404. [PMID: 28663228 PMCID: PMC5593253 DOI: 10.1530/erc-17-0107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) is one strategy for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer; however, the long-term outcomes of NADT with radical prostatectomy including biochemical failure-free survival are not promising. One proposed mechanism is incomplete androgen ablation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficiency of serum hydroxy-androgen suppression in patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer under NADT (leuprolide acetate plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone) and interrogate the primary sources of circulating hydroxy-androgens using our recently described stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography mass spectrometric method. For the first time, three androgen diols including 5-androstene-3β,17β-diol (5-adiol), 5α-androstane-3α,17β-diol (3α-adiol), 5α-androstane-3β,17β-diol (3β-adiol), the glucuronide or sulfate conjugate of 5-adiol and 3α-adiol were measured and observed to be dramatically reduced after NADT. By comparing patients that took leuprolide acetate alone vs leuprolide acetate plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone, we were able to distinguish the primary sources of these androgens and their conjugates as being of either testicular or adrenal in origin. We find that testosterone, 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 3α-adiol and 3β-adiol were predominately of testicular origin. By contrast, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), epi-androsterone (epi-AST) and their conjugates, 5-adiol sulfate and glucuronide were predominately of adrenal origin. Our findings also show that NADT failed to completely suppress DHEA-sulfate levels and that two unappreciated sources of intratumoral androgens that were not suppressed by leuprolide acetate alone were 5-adiol-sulfate and epi-AST-sulfate of adrenal origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianzhu Zang
- Department of Systems Pharmacology & Translational TherapeuticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center of Excellence in Environmental ToxicologyPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Harvard Medical SchoolLank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Tamae
- Department of Systems Pharmacology & Translational TherapeuticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center of Excellence in Environmental ToxicologyPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wanling Xie
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational BiologyHarvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Clementina Mesaros
- Department of Systems Pharmacology & Translational TherapeuticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center of Excellence in Environmental ToxicologyPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Systems Pharmacology & Translational TherapeuticsCenter for Cancer Pharmacology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zhenwei Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational BiologyHarvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Glenn Bubley
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterGenitourinary Medical Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bruce Montgomery
- Department of MedicineUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Steven P Balk
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterGenitourinary Medical Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Ian A Blair
- Department of Systems Pharmacology & Translational TherapeuticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center of Excellence in Environmental ToxicologyPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Systems Pharmacology & Translational TherapeuticsCenter for Cancer Pharmacology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Trevor M Penning
- Department of Systems Pharmacology & Translational TherapeuticsPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center of Excellence in Environmental ToxicologyPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Systems Pharmacology & Translational TherapeuticsCenter for Cancer Pharmacology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Leach DA, Buchanan G. Stromal Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer Development and Progression. Cancers (Basel) 2017; 9:cancers9010010. [PMID: 28117763 PMCID: PMC5295781 DOI: 10.3390/cancers9010010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer development and progression is the result of complex interactions between epithelia cells and fibroblasts/myofibroblasts, in a series of dynamic process amenable to regulation by hormones. Whilst androgen action through the androgen receptor (AR) is a well-established component of prostate cancer biology, it has been becoming increasingly apparent that changes in AR signalling in the surrounding stroma can dramatically influence tumour cell behavior. This is reflected in the consistent finding of a strong association between stromal AR expression and patient outcomes. In this review, we explore the relationship between AR signalling in fibroblasts/myofibroblasts and prostate cancer cells in the primary site, and detail the known functions, actions, and mechanisms of fibroblast AR signaling. We conclude with an evidence-based summary of how androgen action in stroma dramatically influences disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien A Leach
- The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5011, Australia.
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.
| | - Grant Buchanan
- The Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5011, Australia.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Canberra Teaching Hospital, Canberra 2605, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Adenovirus vector carrying REIC/DKK-3 gene: neoadjuvant intraprostatic injection for high-risk localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Cancer Gene Ther 2016; 23:400-409. [PMID: 27767086 PMCID: PMC5116477 DOI: 10.1038/cgt.2016.53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Revised: 09/14/2016] [Accepted: 09/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
As the First-In-Human study of in situ gene therapy using an adenovirus vector carrying the human REIC (reduced expression in immortalized cell)/Dkk-3 gene (Ad-REIC), we conducted neoadjuvant intraprostatic injections in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). Patients with recurrence probability of 35% or more within 5 years following RP, as calculated by Kattan's nomogram, were enrolled. Patients received two ultrasound-guided intratumoral injections at 2-week intervals, followed by RP 6 weeks after the second injection. After confirming the safety of the therapeutic interventions with initially planned three escalating doses of 1.0 × 1010, 1.0 × 1011 and 1.0 × 1012 viral particles (vp) in 1.0-1.2 ml (n=3, 3 and 6), an additional higher dose of 3.0 × 1012 vp in 3.6 ml (n=6) was further studied. All four DLs including the additional dose level-4 (DL-4) were feasible with no adverse events, except for grade 1 or 2 transient fever. Laboratory toxicities were grade 1 or 2 elevated aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase (n=4). Regarding antitumor activities, cytopathic effects (tumor degeneration with cytolysis and pyknosis) and remarkable tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the targeted tumor areas were detected in a clear dose-dependent manner. Consequently, biochemical recurrence-free survival in DL-4 was significantly more favorable than in patient groups DL-1+2+3.
Collapse
|
33
|
Bellefqih S, Hadadi K, Mezouri I, Maghous A, Marnouche E, Andaloussi K, Elmarjany M, Sifat H, Mansouri H, Benjaafar N. Association de radiothérapie et d’hormonothérapie dans la prise en charge des cancers localisés de la prostate : où en est-on ? Cancer Radiother 2016; 20:141-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Revised: 12/21/2015] [Accepted: 12/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
34
|
Lou DY, Fong L. Neoadjuvant therapy for localized prostate cancer: Examining mechanism of action and efficacy within the tumor. Urol Oncol 2016; 34:182-92. [PMID: 24495446 PMCID: PMC4499005 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2013] [Revised: 11/26/2013] [Accepted: 12/09/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Efforts to improve the clinical outcome for patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer have led to the development of neoadjuvant systemic therapies. We review the different modalities of neoadjuvant therapies for localized prostate cancer and highlight emerging treatment approaches including immunotherapy and targeted therapy. METHODS We performed a PubMed search of clinical trials evaluating preoperative systemic therapies for treating high-risk prostate cancer published after 2000, and those studies with the highest clinical relevance to current treatment approaches were selected for review. The database at clinicaltrials.gov was queried for neoadjuvant studies in high-risk prostate cancer, and those evaluating novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies are spotlighted here. RESULTS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become standard of care for treating some malignancies, including breast and bladder cancers. In prostate cancer, preoperative hormonal therapy or chemotherapy has failed to demonstrate improvements in overall survival. Nevertheless, the emergence of novel treatment modalities such as targeted small molecules and immunotherapy has spawned neoadjuvant clinical trials that provide a unique vantage from which to study mechanism of action and biological potency. Tissue-based biomarkers are being developed to elucidate the biological efficacy of these treatments. With targeted therapy, these can include phospho-proteomic signatures of target pathway activation and deactivation. With immunotherapies, including sipuleucel-T and ipilimumab, recruitment of immune cells to the tumor microenvironment can also be used as robust markers of a biological effect. Such studies can provide insight not only into mechanism of action for these therapies but can also provide paths forward to improving clinical efficacy like with rationally designed combinations and dose selection. CONCLUSIONS The use of neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy and chemotherapy either singly or in combination before radical prostatectomy is generally safe and feasible while reducing prostate volume and tumor burden. However, pathologic complete response rates are low and no long-term survival benefit has been observed with the addition of neoadjuvant therapies over surgery alone at present, and therefore preoperative therapy is not the current standard of care in prostate cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Y Lou
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Lawrence Fong
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Helgstrand JT, Berg KD, Lippert S, Brasso K, Røder MA. Systematic review: does endocrine therapy prolong survival in patients with prostate cancer? Scand J Urol 2016; 50:135-43. [DOI: 10.3109/21681805.2016.1142472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
36
|
Kumon H, Sasaki K, Ariyoshi Y, Sadahira T, Araki M, Ebara S, Yanai H, Watanabe M, Nasu Y. Feasibility of Neoadjuvant Ad-REIC Gene Therapy in Patients with High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy. Clin Transl Sci 2015; 8:837-40. [PMID: 26621187 PMCID: PMC4737302 DOI: 10.1111/cts.12362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In a phase I/IIa study of in situ gene therapy using an adenovirus vector carrying the human REIC/Dkk‐3 gene (Ad‐REIC), we assessed the inhibitory effects of cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP), in patients with high risk localized prostate cancer (PCa). After completing the therapeutic interventions with initially planned three escalating doses of 1.0 × 1010, 1.0 × 1011, and 1.0 × 1012 viral particles (VP) in 1.0–1.2 mL (n = 3, 3, and 6), an additional higher dose of 3.0 × 1012 VP in 3.6 mL (n = 6) was further studied. Patients with recurrence probability of 35% or more within 5 years after RP as calculated by Kattan's nomogram, were enrolled. They received two ultrasound‐guided intratumoral injections at 2‐week intervals, followed by RP 6 weeks after the second injection. Based on the findings of MRI and biopsy mapping, as a rule, one track injection to the most prominent cancer area was given to initial 12 patients and 3 track injections to multiple cancer areas in additional 6 patients. As compared to the former group, biochemical recurrence‐free survival of the latter showed a significantly favorable outcome. Neoadjuvant Ad‐REIC, mediating simultaneous induction of cancer selective apoptosis and augmentation of antitumor immunity, is a feasible approach in preventing cancer recurrence after RP. (199)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromi Kumon
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Katsumi Sasaki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yuichi Ariyoshi
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Sadahira
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shin Ebara
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Yanai
- Department of Pathology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Masami Watanabe
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.,Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.,Center for Innovative Clinical Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Salomon L, Ploussard G, Hennequin C, Richaud P, Soulié M. Traitements complémentaires de la chirurgie du cancer de la prostate et chirurgie de la récidive. Prog Urol 2015; 25:1086-107. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
38
|
Hu J, Xu H, Zhu W, Wu F, Wang J, Ding Q, Jiang H. Neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,194 patients. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13:73. [PMID: 25884478 PMCID: PMC4344800 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0503-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Neo-adjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) following radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy has been utilized in the multimodal approach to patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Herein, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized trials to evaluate the clinical efficacy of NHT. Methods Literatures were searched from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for comparing neo-adjuvant therapy group (NHT plus radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy) with traditional therapy (radiotherapy or prostatectomy) alone. Quality of the research was assessed on the basis of the Cochrane’s risk of bias of randomized controlled trial. Comparable information were obtained from eligible trials and assembled for meta-analysis up to 31 August 2014. RevMan 5.2 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Fifteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (total 5,194 patients) were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed there was a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.87, P = 0.0002), positive surgical margin (PSM) rate (OR = 0.30, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.38, P < 0.00001), and biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) (OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.39, P = 0.02), but no significant difference in disease-free survival (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.59, P = 0.12) and clinical disease-free survival (cDFS) (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.22 to 4.18, P = 0.95). Heterogeneity and risk of bias were observed between different studies. Conclusions Patients with aggressive prostate cancer would better benefit from the receipt of neo-adjuvant therapy. Physicians should make individualized treatment strategies according to adverse reactions, financial capacities, and personal wishes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jimeng Hu
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 WuLuMuQi Middle Road, 200040, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Hua Xu
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 WuLuMuQi Middle Road, 200040, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Wenhui Zhu
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 WuLuMuQi Middle Road, 200040, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Fei Wu
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 WuLuMuQi Middle Road, 200040, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Jianqing Wang
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 WuLuMuQi Middle Road, 200040, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Qiang Ding
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 WuLuMuQi Middle Road, 200040, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| | - Haowen Jiang
- Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 WuLuMuQi Middle Road, 200040, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Metformin is not associated with improved biochemical free survival or cause-specific survival in men with prostate cancer treated with permanent interstitial brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2014; 6:254-61. [PMID: 25337126 PMCID: PMC4200187 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2014.45757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2014] [Revised: 09/04/2014] [Accepted: 09/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Several recent studies have suggested improved clinical outcomes in diabetic men with prostate cancer who also use metformin. We explore whether metformin use is associated with improved outcomes specifically in men undergoing prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods 2,298 consecutive patients underwent permanent interstitial brachytherapy by a single brachytherapist (GSM). The cohort included 2028 non-diabetic men, 144 men with diabetes who were not taking metformin, and 126 men with diabetes who were taking metformin. Median follow up was 8.3 years. Differences in biochemical free survival, cause specific survival, and overall survival between men taking metformin and those not taking metformin were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank tests. Results Fifteen year biochemical failure rate, cause specific mortality and overall mortality for non-diabetic men was 4.6%, 1.5%, 47.0%, respectively; for diabetic men taking metformin 4.8%, 2.0%, 37.2%; and for diabetic men not taking metformin was 2.8%, 0%, 72.7%, respectively. Metformin use was not predictive in multivariate analysis of biochemical failure or prostate cancer specific mortality. However, diabetic men not taking metformin had higher overall mortality than non-diabetic men. Conclusions Metformin use was not associated with improved biochemical survival or cancer specific survival in this cohort of men treated with prostate brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
40
|
Androgen deprivation therapy and cardiovascular risk in chinese patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma of prostate. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2014; 2014:529468. [PMID: 24803931 PMCID: PMC3997904 DOI: 10.1155/2014/529468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2013] [Accepted: 03/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Background. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in nonmetastatic prostate cancer is unclear. Recent data suggests possible increase in the cardiovascular risks receiving ADT. The aim of the study was to investigate the cardiovascular outcomes in a cohort of Chinese nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients with no previously documented cardiovascular disease. Methods and Results. 745 patients with no previously documented cardiovascular disease and/or diabetes mellitus diagnosed to have nonmetastatic prostate cancer were recruited. Of these, 517 patients received ADT and the remaining 228 did not. After a mean follow-up of 5.3 years, 60 patients developed primary composite endpoint including (1) coronary artery disease, (2) congestive heart failure, and (3) ischemic stroke. Higher proportion of patients on ADT (51 patients, 9.9%) developed composite endpoint compared with those not on ADT (9 patients, 3.9%) with hazard ratio (HR) of 2.06 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–3.24, P = 0.04). Furthermore, Cox regression analysis revealed that only the use of ADT (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.03–4.25, P = 0.04) and hypertension (HR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.21–3.33, P < 0.01) were independent predictors for primary composite endpoint. Conclusion. ADT in Chinese patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer with no previously documented cardiovascular disease was associated with subsequent development of cardiovascular events.
Collapse
|
41
|
Richard V, Paillard MJ, Mouillet G, Lescut N, Maurina T, Guichard G, Montcuquet P, Martin L, Kleinclauss F, Thiery-Vuillemin A. [Neoadjuvant before surgery treatments: state of the art in prostate cancer]. Prog Urol 2014; 24:595-607. [PMID: 24975795 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2013] [Revised: 11/28/2013] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
GOAL To study the impact of systemic treatment in neoadjuvant strategy before surgery in prostate cancer. MATERIALS Literature reviews with data analysis from PubMed search using the keywords "neoadjuvant", "chemotherapy", "hormonal therapy", "prostate surgery", "radical prostatectomy", but also reports from ASCO and ESMO conferences. The articles on neoadjuvant treatment before radiotherapy were excluded. RESULTS First studies with former therapy are more than 15-years-old and with questionable methodology: lack of power to have a clear idea of the impact on survival criteria such as overall survival or relapse-free survival. However, the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy on the classic risk factors for relapse (positive margins, intraprostatic disease, positive lymph nodes) was demonstrated by these studies and a Cochrane meta-analysis. The association with hormone therapy seems mandatory in comparison to treatment based solely on chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy. Promising data on the use of new drugs and their combinations arise: abiraterone acetate combined with LHRH analogue showed a fast PSA decrease and higher rates of pathologic complete response. Other results are promising with hormonal blockages at various key points. CONCLUSION Studies with 2nd generation anti-androgene agents or enzyme inhibitors seem to show very promising results. To provide answers about the effectiveness of current neoadjuvant strategy in terms of survival, other studies are needed: randomized phase III or phase II exploring predictive biomarkers. The design of such trials requires a multidisciplinary approach with urologists, oncologists, radiologists and methodologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Richard
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Besançon, 25030 Besançon cedex, France
| | - M-J Paillard
- Service d'oncologie médicale, CHU de Besançon, boulevard Flemming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France
| | - G Mouillet
- Service d'oncologie médicale, CHU de Besançon, boulevard Flemming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France
| | - N Lescut
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU de Besançon, 25030 Besançon cedex, France; UMR1098, SFR IBCT, université de Franche-Comté, 25020 Besançon, France
| | - T Maurina
- Service d'oncologie médicale, CHU de Besançon, boulevard Flemming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France
| | - G Guichard
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Besançon, 25030 Besançon cedex, France
| | - P Montcuquet
- Service d'oncologie médicale, CHU de Besançon, boulevard Flemming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France
| | - L Martin
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Besançon, 25030 Besançon cedex, France
| | - F Kleinclauss
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Besançon, 25030 Besançon cedex, France; Inserm, UMR1098, 25020 Besançon cedex, France; UMR1098, SFR IBCT, université de Franche-Comté, 25020 Besançon, France
| | - A Thiery-Vuillemin
- Service d'oncologie médicale, CHU de Besançon, boulevard Flemming, 25030 Besançon cedex, France; Inserm, UMR1098, 25020 Besançon cedex, France; UMR1098, SFR IBCT, université de Franche-Comté, 25020 Besançon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Morgan SC, Dearnaley DP. Additional therapy for high-risk prostate cancer treated with surgery: what is the evidence? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 9:939-51. [DOI: 10.1586/era.09.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
43
|
Rozet F, Audenet F, Sanchez-Salas R, Galiano M, Barret E, Cathelineau X. Accurate patient selection and multimodal treatment offer the best therapeutic option in high-risk prostate cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 13:811-8. [DOI: 10.1586/14737140.2013.811149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
44
|
Salomon L, Bastide C, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, Fromont G, Hennequin C, Mongiat-Artus P, Peyromaure M, Ploussard G, Renard-Penna R, Rozet F, Azria D, Coloby P, Molinié V, Ravery V, Rebillard X, Richaud P, Villers A, Soulié M. Recommandations en onco-urologie 2013 du CCAFU : Cancer de la prostate. Prog Urol 2013; 23 Suppl 2:S69-101. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(13)70048-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
45
|
McKay RR, Choueiri TK, Taplin ME. Rationale for and review of neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical prostatectomy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Drugs 2013; 73:1417-30. [PMID: 23943203 PMCID: PMC4127573 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-013-0107-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite state of the art local therapy, a significant portion of men with high-risk prostate cancer develop progressive disease. Neoadjuvant systemic therapy prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) is an approach that can potentially maximize survival outcomes in patients with localized disease. This approach is under investigation with a wide array of agents and provides an opportunity to assess pathologic and biologic activity of novel treatments. The aim of this review is to explore the past and present role of neoadjuvant therapy prior to definitive therapy with RP in patients with high-risk localized or locally advanced disease. The results of neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), including use of newer agents such as abiraterone, are promising. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, primarily with docetaxel, with or without ADT has also demonstrated efficacy in men with high-risk disease. Other novel agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), clusterin, and the immune system are currently under investigation and have led to variable results in early clinical trials. Despite optimistic data, approval of neoadjuvant therapy prior to RP in patients with high-risk prostate cancer will depend on positive results from well designed phase III trials.
Collapse
|
46
|
Zaorsky NG, Trabulsi EJ, Lin J, Den RB. Multimodality therapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer: current status and future directions. Semin Oncol 2013; 40:308-21. [PMID: 23806496 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and second most common cause of cancer death in American men. Although high-risk disease accounts for less than 15% of diagnoses, high-risk prostate cancer patients have a cancer-specific mortality rate of 15% at 10 years. There is currently no consensus on the optimal management of high-risk disease because (1) there are different primary modalities available (ie, surgery, radiation), for which there are no randomized trials comparing efficacy; and (2) unstandardized timing of different therapies (ie, neoadjuvant v concurrent v adjuvant), which makes comparisons of efficacy problematic. Increased understanding into the mechanisms leading to the formation of advanced metastatic disease has spurred the development of agents to target these pathways. However, new questions regarding optimal management of disease arise with regard to the role of these therapies in combination with "conventional" primary modalities for earlier stage, high-risk prostate cancer patients. In this article, we review the transforming world of multimodality therapy in high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Perlroth DJ, Bhattacharya J, Goldman DP, Garber AM. An economic analysis of conservative management versus active treatment for men with localized prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2013; 2012:250-7. [PMID: 23271781 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgs037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Comparative effectiveness research suggests that conservative management (CM) strategies are no less effective than active initial treatment for many men with localized prostate cancer. We estimate longer-term costs of initial management strategies and potential US health expenditure savings by increased use of conservative management for men with localized prostate cancer. Five-year total health expenditures attributed to initial management strategies for localized prostate cancer were calculated using commercial claims data from 1998 to 2006, and savings were estimated from a US population health-care expenditure model. Our analysis finds that patients receiving combinations of active treatments have the highest additional costs over conservative management at $63 500, followed by $48 550 for intensity-modulated radiation therapy, $37 500 for primary androgen deprivation therapy, and $28 600 for brachytherapy. Radical prostatectomy ($15 200) and external beam radiation therapy ($18 900) were associated with the lowest costs. The population model estimated that US health expenditures could be lowered by 1) use of initial CM over all active treatment ($2.9-3.25 billion annual savings), 2) shifting patients receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy to CM ($680-930 million), 3) foregoing primary androgen deprivation therapy($555 million), 4) reducing the use of adjuvant androgen deprivation in addition to local therapies ($630 million), and 5) using single treatments rather than combination local treatment ($620-655 million). In conclusion, we find that all active treatments are associated with higher longer-term costs than CM. Substantial savings, representing up to 30% of total costs, could be realized by adopting CM strategies, including active surveillance, for initial management of men with localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniella J Perlroth
- Center for Health Policy, Stanford University, 117 Encina Commons, Stanford, CA 94305-6019, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
O'Shaughnessy MJ, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Konety BR, Elliott SP. Factors associated with reduction in use of neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy before radical prostatectomy. Urology 2013; 81:745-51. [PMID: 23465162 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2012] [Revised: 11/30/2012] [Accepted: 12/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether the prescribing patterns for nonindicated androgen suppression therapy (AST), using neoadjuvant AST as the model, changed according to the prevailing clinical evidence, changes in reimbursement, or evidence of increased harm from treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 34,976 men with prostate cancer who had undergone radical prostatectomy within 12 months of diagnosis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data set (1992-2007), and their clinical and demographic parameters were assessed. We measured the Medicare claims for receipt of AST before radical prostatectomy and calculated the annual rates of neoadjuvant AST, which were adjusted for confounding variables using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and compared them with the prevailing published clinical data on the outcomes of neoadjuvant AST, changes in reimbursement, or published data on clinical harm from treatment. RESULTS The use of neoadjuvant AST increased from 7.8% in 1992 to a peak of 17.6% in 1996 and then decreased steadily to 4.6% in 2007. This rate change was significant on multivariate regression analysis, with a single join point in 1996 (P <.001), and corresponded to published data showing improved surgical margin rates and pathologic downstaging in the early 1990s and data showing no improvement in disease recurrence or overall survival beginning in 1997. Changes in reimbursement and evidence of harm from AST were not associated with the decreased use of neoadjuvant AST. CONCLUSION Using neoadjuvant AST as the model for the nonindicated use of AST, physicians reduced AST use in response to high-level evidence showing a lack of benefit, despite the high reimbursement. This suggests that physicians adapt to emerging evidence and use evidence-based practice.
Collapse
|
49
|
Garzotto M, Hung AY. Advances in the Multimodality Management of High-risk Prostate Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2013; 22:375-94. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2012.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
50
|
Leclercq C, Bouchot O, Azzouzi AR, Joly F, Miaadi N, Pfister C, Vincendeau S, de Crevoisier R. Hormonothérapie et risque cardiaque dans le traitement des cancers prostatiques. Prog Urol 2012; 22 Suppl 2:S48-54. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(12)70036-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|