Interaction between GABAA receptor subunit intracellular loops: implications for higher order complex formation

GABA system in the prefrontal cortex involved in psychostimulant addiction

Drug addiction is a chronic and relapse brain disorder. Psychostimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine are highly addictive drugs. Abuse drugs target various brain areas in the nervous system. Recent studies have shown that the prefrontal cortex (PFC) plays a key role in regulating addictive behaviors. The PFC is made up of excitatory glutamatergic cells and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAergic) interneurons. Recently, studies showed that GABA level was related with psychostimulant addiction. In this review, we will introduce the role and mechanism of GABA and γ-aminobutyric acid receptors (GABARs) of the PFC in regulating drug addiction, especially in psychostimulant addiction.

A new perspective on the autophagic and non-autophagic functions of the GABARAP protein family: a potential therapeutic target for human diseases

Mammalian autophagy-related protein Atg8, including the LC3 subfamily and GABARAP subfamily. Atg8 proteins play a vital role in autophagy initiation, autophagosome formation and transport, and autophagy-lysosome fusion. GABARAP subfamily proteins (GABARAPs) share a high degree of homology with LC3 family proteins, and their unique roles are often overlooked. GABARAPs are as indispensable as LC3 in autophagy. Deletion of GABARAPs fails autophagy flux induction and autophagy lysosomal fusion, which leads to the failure of autophagy. GABARAPs are also involved in the transport of selective autophagy receptors. They are engaged in various particular autophagy processes, including mitochondrial autophagy, endoplasmic reticulum autophagy, Golgi autophagy, centrosome autophagy, and dorphagy. Furthermore, GABARAPs are closely related to the transport and delivery of the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-GABAA and the angiotensin II AT1 receptor (AT1R), tumor growth, metastasis, and prognosis. GABARAPs also have been confirmed to be involved in various diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and neurodegenerative diseases. In order to better understand the role and therapeutic potential of GABARAPs, this article comprehensively reviews the autophagic and non-autophagic functions of GABARAPs, as well as the research progress of the role and mechanism of GABARAPs in cancer, cardiovascular diseases and neurodegenerative diseases. It emphasizes the significance of GABARAPs in the clinical prevention and treatment of diseases, and may provide new therapeutic ideas and targets for human diseases. GABARAP and GABARAPL1 in the serum of cancer patients are positively correlated with the prognosis of patients, which can be used as a clinical biomarker, predictor and potential therapeutic target.

Analyzing the mechanisms that facilitate the subtype-specific assembly of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors

Impaired inhibitory signaling underlies the pathophysiology of many neuropsychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders including autism spectrum disorders and epilepsy. Neuronal inhibition is regulated by synaptic and extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA _A Rs), which mediate phasic and tonic inhibition, respectively. These two GABA _A R subtypes differ in their function, ligand sensitivity, and physiological properties. Importantly, they contain different α subunit isoforms: synaptic GABA _A Rs contain the α1-3 subunits whereas extrasynaptic GABA _A Rs contain the α4-6 subunits. While the subunit composition is critical for the distinct roles of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA _A R subtypes in inhibition, the molecular mechanism of the subtype-specific assembly has not been elucidated. To address this issue, we purified endogenous α1- and α4-containing GABA _A Rs from adult murine forebrains and examined their subunit composition and interacting proteins using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and quantitative analysis. We found that the α1 and α4 subunits form separate populations of GABA _A Rs and interact with distinct sets of binding proteins. We also discovered that the β3 subunit, which co-purifies with both the α1 and α4 subunits, has different levels of phosphorylation on serines 408 and 409 (S408/9) between the two receptor subtypes. To understand the role S408/9 plays in the assembly of α1- and α4-containing GABA _A Rs, we examined the effects of S408/9A (alanine) knock-in mutation on the subunit composition of the two receptor subtypes using LC-MS/MS and quantitative analysis. We discovered that the S408/9A mutation results in the formation of novel α1α4-containing GABA _A Rs. Moreover, in S408/9A mutants, the plasma membrane expression of the α4 subunit is increased whereas its retention in the endoplasmic reticulum is reduced. These findings suggest that S408/9 play a critical role in determining the subtype-specific assembly of GABA _A Rs, and thus the efficacy of neuronal inhibition.

Inhibitory Synapse Formation at the Axon Initial Segment

The axon initial segment (AIS) is the site of action potential (AP) initiation in most neurons and is thus a critical site in the regulation of neuronal excitability. Normal function within the discrete AIS compartment requires intricate molecular machinery to ensure the proper concentration and organization of voltage-gated and ligand-gated ion channels; in humans, dysfunction at the AIS due to channel mutations is commonly associated with epileptic disorders. In this review, we will examine the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of the only synapses found at the AIS: synapses containing γ-aminobutyric type A receptors (GABA_ARs). GABA_ARs are heteropentamers assembled from 19 possible subunits and are the primary mediators of fast synaptic inhibition in the brain. Although the total GABA_AR population is incredibly heterogeneous, only one specific GABA_AR subtype—the α2-containing receptor—is enriched at the AIS. These AIS synapses are innervated by GABAergic chandelier cells, and this inhibitory signaling is thought to contribute to the tight control of AP firing. Here, we will summarize the progress made in understanding the regulation of GABA_AR synapse formation, concentrating on post-translational modifications of subunits and on interactions with intracellular proteins. We will then discuss subtype-specific synapse formation, with a focus on synapses found at the AIS, and how these synapses influence neuronal excitation.

Membrane distribution of the glycine receptor α3 studied by optical super-resolution microscopy

In this study, the effect of glycine receptor (GlyR) α3 alternative RNA splicing on the distribution of receptors in the membrane of human embryonic kidney 293 cells is investigated using optical super-resolution microscopy. Direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy is used to image both α3K and α3L splice variants individually and together using single- and dual-color imaging. Pair correlation analysis is used to extract quantitative measures from the resulting images. Autocorrelation analysis of the individually expressed variants reveals clustering of both variants, yet with differing properties. The cluster size is increased for α3L compared to α3K (mean radius 92 ± 4 and 56 ± 3 nm, respectively), yet an even bigger difference is found in the cluster density (9,870 ± 1,433 and 1,747 ± 200 μm(-2), respectively). Furthermore, cross-correlation analysis revealed that upon co-expression, clusters colocalize on the same spatial scales as for individually expressed receptors (mean co-cluster radius 94 ± 6 nm). These results demonstrate that RNA splicing determines GlyR α3 membrane distribution, which has consequences for neuronal GlyR physiology and function.

Direct binding of GABAA receptor β2 and β3 subunits to gephyrin

GABAergic transmission is essential to brain function, and a large repertoire of GABA type A receptor (GABA(A) R) subunits is at a neuron's disposition to serve this function. The glycine receptor (GlyR)-associated protein gephyrin has been shown to be essential for the clustering of a subset of GABA(A) R. Despite recent progress in the field of gephyrin-dependent mechanisms of postsynaptic GABA(A) R stabilisation, the role of gephyrin in synaptic GABA(A) R localisation has remained a complex matter with many open questions. Here, we analysed comparatively the interaction of purified rat gephyrin and mouse brain gephyrin with the large cytoplasmic loops of GABA(A) R α1, α2, β2 and β3 subunits. Binding affinities were determined using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy, and showed an ~ 20-fold lower affinity of the β2 loop to gephyrin as compared to the GlyR β loop-gephyrin interaction. We also probed in vivo binding in primary cortical neurons by the well-established use of chimaeras of GlyR α1 that harbour respective gephyrin-binding motifs derived from the different GABA(A) R subunits. These studies identify a novel gephyrin-binding motif in GABA(A) R β2 and β3 large cytoplasmic loops.

Selective modulation of different GABAA receptor isoforms by diazepam and etomidate in hippocampal neurons

Diazepam modulation of native γ2-containing GABA(A) (γGABA(A)) receptors increases channel conductance by facilitating protein interactions involving the γ2-subunit amphipathic (MA) region, which is found in the cytoplasmic loop between transmembrane domains 3 and 4 (Everitt et al., 2009). However, many drugs, predicted to act on different GABA(A) receptor subtypes, increase channel conductance leading us to hypothesize that conductance variation in GABA(A) receptors may be a general property, mediated by protein interactions involving the cytoplasmic MA stretch of amino acids. In this study we have tested this hypothesis by potentiating extrasynaptic GABA(A) currents with etomidate and examining the ability of peptides mimicking either the γ2- or δ-subunit MA region to affect conductance. In inside-out hippocampal patches from newborn rats the general anesthetic etomidate potentiated GABA currents, producing either an increase in open probability and single-channel conductance or an increase in open probability, as described previously (Seymour et al., 2009). In patches displaying high conductance channels application of a δ((392-422)) MA peptide, but not a scrambled version or the equivalent γ2((381-403)) MA peptide, reduced the potentiating effects of etomidate, significantly reducing single-channel conductance. In contrast, when GABA currents were potentiated by the γ2-specific drug diazepam the δ MA peptide had no effect. These data reveal that diazepam and etomidate potentiate different extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptor subtypes but both drugs modulate conductance similarly. One interpretation of the data is that these drugs elicit potentiation through protein interactions and that the MA peptides compete with these interactions to disrupt this process.

Discrete M3-M4 intracellular loop subdomains control specific aspects of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor function

The GABA type A receptor (GABA(A)R) is a member of the pentameric ligand gated ion channel (pLGIC) family that mediates ionotropic neurotransmission. Residues in the intracellular loop domain (ILD) have recently been shown to define part of the ion permeation pathway in several closely related members of the pentameric ligand gated ion channel family. In this study, we investigated the role the ILD of the GABA(A)R α1 subunit plays in channel function. Deletion of the α1 ILD resulted in a significant increase in GABA EC(50) and maximal current amplitude, suggesting that the ILD must be intact for proper receptor function. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a mutagenic screen of all amino acids harboring ionizable side chains within this domain to investigate the contribution of individual charged residues to ion permeation. Using macroscopic and single channel voltage-clamp recording techniques, we found that mutations within a subdomain of the α1 ILD near M3 altered GABA apparent affinity; interestingly, α1(K312E) exhibited reduced partial agonist efficacy. We introduced point mutations near M4, including α1(K383E) and α1(K384E), that enhanced receptor desensitization. Mutation of 5 charged residues within a 39-residue span contiguous with M4 reduced relative anion permeability of the channel and may represent a weak intracellular selectivity filter. Within this subdomain, the α1(K378E) mutation induced a significant reduction in single channel conductance, consistent with our hypothesis that the GABA(A)R α1 ILD contributes directly to the permeation pathway.

GABAA receptor trafficking-mediated plasticity of inhibitory synapses

Proper developmental, neural cell-type-specific, and activity-dependent regulation of GABAergic transmission is essential for virtually all aspects of CNS function. The number of GABA(A) receptors in the postsynaptic membrane directly controls the efficacy of GABAergic synaptic transmission. Thus, regulated trafficking of GABA(A) receptors is essential for understanding brain function in both health and disease. Here we summarize recent progress in the understanding of mechanisms that allow dynamic adaptation of cell surface expression and postsynaptic accumulation and function of GABA(A) receptors. This includes activity-dependent and cell-type-specific changes in subunit gene expression, assembly of subunits into receptors, as well as exocytosis, endocytic recycling, diffusion dynamics, and degradation of GABA(A) receptors. In particular, we focus on the roles of receptor-interacting proteins, scaffold proteins, synaptic adhesion proteins, and enzymes that regulate the trafficking and function of receptors and associated proteins. In addition, we review neuropeptide signaling pathways that affect neural excitability through changes in GABA(A)R trafficking.

Inactivation of GABA(A) receptor reduces ginsenoside Rb3 neuroprotection in mouse hippocampal slices after oxygen-glucose deprivation

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate the effect of ginsenoside Rb(3) on synaptic transmission after oxygen-glucose deprivation in vitro.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The population spike (PS) was recorded in the stratum pyramidale of mouse hippocampal slices using extracellular recordings.

RESULTS

Ginsenoside Rb(3) depressed the basal synaptic transmission, which also promoted the recovery amplitude of PS after OGD in a concentration-dependent manner. The GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol improved the recovery, which was similar to that of ginsenoside Rb(3). Moreover, the effect of ginsenoside Rb(3) in combination with muscimol was not additive. Treatment with the GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline or picrotoxin, which prevented the depression of PS caused by ginsenoside Rb(3), also reduced the neuroprotection.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the activation of the GABA(A) receptor is correlated with the neuroprotective mechanisms of ginsenoside Rb(3).

Complex role of collybistin and gephyrin in GABAA receptor clustering

Gephyrin and collybistin are key components of GABA(A) receptor (GABA(A)R) clustering. Nonetheless, resolving the molecular interactions between the plethora of GABA(A)R subunits and these clustering proteins is a significant challenge. We report a direct interaction of GABA(A)R α2 and α3 subunit intracellular M3-M4 domain (but not α1, α4, α5, α6, β1-3, or γ1-3) with gephyrin. Curiously, GABA(A)R α2, but not α3, binds to both gephyrin and collybistin using overlapping sites. The reciprocal binding sites on gephyrin for collybistin and GABA(A)R α2 also overlap at the start of the gephyrin E domain. This suggests that although GABA(A)R α3 interacts with gephyrin, GABA(A)R α2, collybistin, and gephyrin form a trimeric complex. In support of this proposal, tri-hybrid interactions between GABA(A)R α2 and collybistin or GABA(A)R α2 and gephyrin are strengthened in the presence of gephyrin or collybistin, respectively. Collybistin and gephyrin also compete for binding to GABA(A)R α2 in co-immunoprecipitation experiments and co-localize in transfected cells in both intracellular and submembrane aggregates. Interestingly, GABA(A)R α2 is capable of "activating " collybistin isoforms harboring the regulatory SH3 domain, enabling targeting of gephyrin to the submembrane aggregates. The GABA(A)R α2-collybistin interaction was disrupted by a pathogenic mutation in the collybistin SH3 domain (p.G55A) that causes X-linked intellectual disability and seizures by disrupting GABA(A)R and gephyrin clustering. Because immunohistochemistry in retina revealed a preferential co-localization of collybistin with α2 subunit containing GABA(A)Rs, but not GlyRs or other GABA(A)R subtypes, we propose that the collybistin-gephyrin complex has an intimate role in the clustering of GABA(A)Rs containing the α2 subunit.

Protein interactions involving the gamma2 large cytoplasmic loop of GABA(A) receptors modulate conductance

Native GABA(A) channels display a single-channel conductance ranging between approximately 10 and 90 pS. Diazepam increases the conductance of some of these native channels but never those of recombinant receptors, unless they are coexpressed with GABARAP. This trafficking protein clusters recombinant receptors in the membrane, suggesting that high-conductance channels arise from receptors that are at locally high concentrations. The amphipathic (MA) helix that is present in the large cytoplasmic loop of every subunit of all ligand-gated ion channels mediates protein-protein interactions. Here we report that when applied to inside-out patches, a peptide mimicking the MA helix of the gamma2 subunit (gamma(381-403)) of the GABA(A) receptor abrogates the potentiating effect of diazepam on both endogenous receptors and recombinant GABA(A) receptors coexpressed with GABARAP, by substantially reducing their conductance. The protein interaction disrupted by the peptide did not involve GABARAP, because a shorter peptide (gamma(386-403)) known to compete with the gamma2-GABARAP interaction did not affect the conductance of recombinant alphabetagamma receptors coexpressed with GABARAP. The requirement for receptor clustering and the fact that the gamma2 MA helix is able to self-associate support a mechanism whereby adjacent GABA(A) receptors interact via their gamma2-subunit MA helices, altering ion permeation through each channel. Alteration of ion-channel function arising from dynamic interactions between ion channels of the same family has not been reported previously and highlights a novel way in which inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain may be differentially modulated.

The trafficking protein GABARAP binds to and enhances plasma membrane expression and function of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor

Proteins that bind to the intracellular expanses, particularly cytoplasmic tail regions, of heptahelical integral membrane receptors are of particular interest in that they can mediate or modulate trafficking or intracellular signaling. In an effort to distinguish new proteins that might promote angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor intracellular events, we screened a yeast 2-hybrid mouse brain library with the rat AT(1A) receptor (AT(1)R) carboxyl terminus and identified GABARAP, a protein involved in intracellular trafficking of the GABA(A) receptor, as a binding partner for the AT(1)R. Interaction of GABARAP with the AT(1)R carboxyl terminus was further substantiated using GST pull-down assays, and binding of the full-length tagged AT(1)R to GABARAP was verified using coimmunoprecipitation. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assays further confirmed specific interaction of GABARAP with AT(1)R. Moreover, GABARAP clearly increased the steady-state level of plasma membrane-associated AT(1)R in PC-12 cells. Cotransfection of GABARAP with an AT(1)R fluorescent fusion protein increased PC-12 cell surface expression of the AT(1)R more than 6-fold when standardized to the level of intracellular expression. Furthermore, GABARAP overexpression in CHO-K1 cells engineered to express AT(1)R increased angiotensin II binding sites 3.7-fold and angiotensin II-induced phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and cellular proliferation significantly over levels obtained with AT(1)R overexpression alone. In addition, small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of GABARAP reduced the steady-state levels of the AT(1)R fluorescent fusion protein by 43% and its cell surface expression by 84%. Immunoblot analyses confirmed the quantitative image data. We conclude that GABARAP binds to and promotes trafficking of the AT(1)R to the plasma membrane.

Regulation of synaptic inhibition by phospho-dependent binding of the AP2 complex to a YECL motif in the GABAA receptor gamma2 subunit

The regulation of the number of gamma2-subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors (GABA(A)Rs) present at synapses is critical for correct synaptic inhibition and animal behavior. This regulation occurs, in part, by the controlled removal of receptors from the membrane in clathrin-coated vesicles, but it remains unclear how clathrin recruitment to surface gamma2-subunit-containing GABA(A)Rs is regulated. Here, we identify a gamma2-subunit-specific Yxxvarphi-type-binding motif for the clathrin adaptor protein, AP2, which is located within a site for gamma2-subunit tyrosine phosphorylation. Blocking GABA(A)R-AP2 interactions via this motif increases synaptic responses within minutes. Crystallographic and biochemical studies reveal that phosphorylation of the Yxxvarphi motif inhibits AP2 binding, leading to increased surface receptor number. In addition, the crystal structure provides an explanation for the high affinity of this motif for AP2 and suggests that gamma2-subunit-containing heteromeric GABA(A)Rs may be internalized as dimers or multimers. These data define a mechanism for tyrosine kinase regulation of GABA(A)R surface levels and synaptic inhibition.

Tandem subunits effectively constrain GABAA receptor stoichiometry and recapitulate receptor kinetics but are insensitive to GABAA receptor-associated protein

GABAergic synapses likely contain multiple GABAA receptor subtypes, making postsynaptic currents difficult to dissect. However, even in heterologous expression systems, analysis of receptors composed of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits can be confounded by receptors expressed from alpha and beta subunits alone. To produce recombinant GABAA receptors containing fixed subunit stoichiometry, we coexpressed individual subunits with a "tandem" alpha1 subunit linked to a beta2 subunit. Cotransfection of the gamma2 subunit with alphabeta-tandem subunits in human embryonic kidney 293 cells produced currents that were similar in their macroscopic kinetics, single-channel amplitudes, and pharmacology to overexpression of the gamma subunit with nonlinked alpha1 and beta2 subunits. Similarly, expression of alpha subunits together with alphabeta-tandem subunits produced receptors having physiological and pharmacological characteristics that closely matched cotransfection of alpha with beta subunits. In this first description of tandem GABAA subunits measured with patch-clamp and rapid agonist application techniques, we conclude that incorporation of alphabeta-tandem subunits can be used to fix stoichiometry and to establish the intrinsic kinetic properties of alpha1beta2 and alpha1beta2gamma2 receptors. We used this method to test whether the accessory protein GABAA receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) alters GABAA receptor properties directly or influences subunit composition. In recombinant receptors with fixed stoichiometry, coexpression of GABARAP-enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fusion protein had no effect on desensitization, deactivation, or diazepam potentiation of GABA-mediated currents. However, in alpha1beta2gamma2S transfections in which stoichiometry was not fixed, GABARAP-EGFP altered desensitization, deactivation, and diazepam potentiation of GABA-mediated currents. The data suggest that GABARAP does not alter receptor kinetics directly but by facilitating surface expression of alphabetagamma receptors.

Distinct gamma2 subunit domains mediate clustering and synaptic function of postsynaptic GABAA receptors and gephyrin

Modulation of the concentration of postsynaptic GABA(A) receptors contributes to functional plasticity of inhibitory synapses. The gamma2 subunit of GABA(A) receptor is specifically required for clustering of these receptors, for recruitment of the submembrane scaffold protein gephyrin to postsynaptic sites, and for postsynaptic function of GABAergic inhibitory synapses. To elucidate this mechanism, we here have mapped the gamma2 subunit domains required for restoration of postsynaptic clustering and function of GABA(A) receptors in gamma2 subunit mutant neurons. Transfection of gamma2-/- neurons with the gamma2 subunit but not the alpha2 subunit rescues postsynaptic clustering of GABA(A) receptors, results in recruitment of gephyrin to postsynaptic sites, and restores the amplitude and frequency of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents to wild-type levels. Analogous analyses of chimeric gamma2/alpha2 subunit constructs indicate, unexpectedly, that the fourth transmembrane domain of the gamma2 subunit is required and sufficient for postsynaptic clustering of GABA(A) receptors, whereas cytoplasmic gamma2 subunit domains are dispensable. In contrast, both the major cytoplasmic loop and the fourth transmembrane domain of the gamma2 subunit contribute to efficient recruitment of gephyrin to postsynaptic receptor clusters and are essential for restoration of miniature IPSCs. Our study points to a novel mechanism involved in targeting of GABA(A) receptors and gephyrin to inhibitory synapses.

GABAA receptor-associated protein regulates GABAA receptor cell-surface number in Xenopus laevis oocytes

GABA(A) receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) was isolated previously in a yeast two-hybrid screen using the intracellular loop of the gamma2 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor as bait. GABARAP has been shown to participate in the membrane-clustering and intracellular-trafficking of GABA(A) receptors, including a stimulation of the surface expression of GABA(A) receptors. To assess this quantitatively, we used Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing alpha1beta2gamma2S-containing GABA(A) receptors to demonstrate that coexpression of GABARAP increased net surface levels of GABA(A) receptors as shown by both increased GABA currents and surface-expressed protein. This GABARAP stimulation of GABA currents required the receptor gamma2 subunit and full-length GABARAP: deletion of the microtubule-binding domain (amino acids 1-22) or disrupting the polymerization of microtubules abolished the enhancement, indicating that the effect of GABARAP was derived from the interaction with microtubules. GABARAP coexpression did not alter the general properties of GABA(A) receptors such as sensitivity to GABA or benzodiazepines, but it increased surface levels of receptor protein in oocytes. Rather, it seems to supplement inadequate amounts of endogenous GABARAP to support optimum trafficking and/or stabilization of surface GABA(A) receptors.

Suppression subtractive hybridization and microarray identification of estrogen-regulated hypothalamic genes

The gonadal steroid estrogen is a pleiotropic hormone that has multiple effects on numerous cellular functions. One of estrogen's major targets is the brain, where the steroid not only affects growth, differentiation, and survival of neurons, but also regulates cell excitability. Because estrogen modulates multiple, overlapping signaling pathways, it has been difficult to scrutinize the transcriptional activity of the steroid. Therefore, we still lack a global picture of how different genes interact and are regulated by estrogen. Herein we report the use of suppression subtractive hybridization followed by custom microarray analysis of thousands of genes that are differentially expressed during the negative feedback phase of the female reproductive cycle. We have found a number of key transcripts that are regulated by estrogen and contribute to the alteration in synaptic transmission and hence excitability of hypothalamic neurons (e.g., GABA neurons). These include gec-1, GABA(B)R2, PI3 kinase subunit p55gamma, and a number of proteins containing pleckstrin homology domains that are critical for plasma membrane targeting. Studies are underway to refine our analysis to individual nuclei and individual cells. However, what has emerged from this highly sensitive microarray analysis is that estrogen affects neuronal plasticity in hypothalamic neurons not only by transcription of new membrane proteins (e.g., receptors and channels), but also by altering expression of downstream signaling molecules and proteins involved in neurosecretory pathways.

Expression of alpha 5 GABAA receptor subunit in developing rat hippocampus

The GABAergic system plays an important role in the hippocampal development. Here we have studied the developmental expression of the alpha 5 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor (from rat hippocampus) by RT-competitive PCR, immunoblot and immunocytochemistry. Our results demonstrated an early induction of the alpha 5 subunit expression (at mRNA and protein levels) during the first postnatal week, peaking at P5 and decreasing after this age. The peak of alpha 5 subunit expression precedes the peak of expression for the synaptophysin, GAD65 and GAD67. Thus, the increase in the alpha 5 GABA(A) receptor subunit expression may precede the GABAergic synaptogenesis. Importantly, between P0 and P7, the expression of the alpha 5 subunit was concentrated at the cell somata of the pyramidal and granular cells. After P10, its localization shifted from the cell bodies to the dendritic layers. This developmental pattern is similar to that reported for the Na(+)-K(+)-2Cl(-) system and it might be correlated with the transition from excitatory to inhibitory GABAergic activity.

Subunit composition and quantitative importance of GABA(A) receptor subtypes in the cerebellum of mouse and rat

In cerebellum, 13 different GABA(A) receptor subunits are expressed. The number of different receptor subtypes formed in this tissue, their subunit composition and their quantitative importance so far has not been determined. In the present study, immunodepletion by immunoaffinity chromatography, as well as immunoprecipitation and western blot analysis was performed using 13 different subunit-specific antibodies to provide an overview on the subunit composition and abundance of GABA(A) receptor subtypes in mouse and rat cerebellum. Results obtained indicate that alpha1betaxgamma2, alpha1alpha6betaxgamma2, alpha6betaxgamma2, alpha6betaxdelta and alpha1alpha6betaxdelta are the major GABA(A) receptor subtypes present in the cerebellum. In addition, small amounts of alpha1betaxdelta receptors and a series of minor receptor subtypes containing alpha2, alpha3, alpha4, alpha5, gamma1 or gamma3 subunits are also present in the cerebellum. Whereas the abundance of alpha1alpha6betaxgamma2, alpha6betaxdelta and alpha1alpha6betaxdelta receptors is different in mouse and rat cerebellum, that of other receptors is quite similar in these tissues. Data obtained for the first time provide an overview on the GABA(A) receptor subtypes present in the cerebellum and represent the basis for further studies investigating changes in receptor expression and composition under pathological conditions.

Involvement of LMA1 and GATE-16 family members in intracellular membrane dynamics

Intracellular membrane fusion is conserved from yeast to man as well as among different intracellular trafficking pathways. This process can be generally divided into several well-defined biochemical reactions. First, an early recognition (or tethering) takes place between donor and acceptor membranes, mediated by ypt/rab GTPases and complexes of tethering factors. Subsequently, a closer association between the two membranes is achieved by a docking process, which involves tight association between membrane proteins termed SNAREs. The formation of such a trans-SNARE complex leads to the final membrane fusion, resulting in an accumulation of cis-SNARE complexes on the acceptor membrane. Thus, multiple rounds of transport and delivery of the donor SNARE back to its original membrane require dissociation of the SNARE complexes. SNARE dissociation, termed priming, is mediated by the AAA ATPase, N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) and its partner, soluble NSF attachment protein (SNAP), in a reaction that requires ATP hydrolysis. In the present review we focus on LMA1 and GATE-16, two low-molecular-weight proteins, which assist in priming SNARE molecules in the vacuole in yeast and the Golgi complex in mammals, respectively. LMA1 and GATE-16 are suggested to keep the dissociated cis-SNAREs apart from each other, allowing multiple fusion processes to take place. GATE-16 belongs to a novel family of ubiquitin-like proteins conserved from yeast to man. We discuss here the involvement of this family in multiple intracellular trafficking pathways.