Second-line treatment and consolidation therapies in advanced ovarian cancer

Hexamethylmelamine as consolidation treatment for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in complete response after first-line chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of consolidation therapy with hexamethylmelamine (HMM) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients treated at our hospital between January 1997 and November 2006 and in documented clinical complete response from advanced ovarian cancer following front-line platinum-based therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The patients treated with HMM were compared to the patients of matched counterpart without consolidation therapy. Of 102 patients enrolled, 49 were treated with HMM and 53 received no consolidation treatment. For patients with HMM and observed patients, the mean age were 54.6 and 55.6 yr; the distribution of stage was similar (P=0.977); the optimal surgery was performed in 36 (73.5%) and 44 (83%) (P=0.336); the recurrence rate were 27 (55.1%) and 33 (62.3%) (P=0.463); and the median progression-free survival were 38 months and 21 months for patients with HMM and observed patients (P=0.235). No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the follow-up period. Although this study failed to show the significant survival benefit of consolidation therapy with HMM in patients with advanced EOC, we consider that our study can contribute data to investigate the effectiveness of consolidation therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Ten years of “Optimal Therapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer. Update” Meeting

TheInternational Symposium on Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Optimal Therapywas founded by Dr. Andrés Poveda and Prof. Jan B. Vermorken, and each edition has been directed by them. The 6th edition was held on March 2, 2007. This symposium is organized every other year by GEICO (Grupo Español de Investigación de Cáncer de Ovario/Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group), under the auspices of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG), and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) Educational Committee for its Medical Oncology Recertification Approval (ESMO/MORA) Program. One hundred and fifty people attended the symposium's 1st edition, held in 1996. Since then, the interest in this meeting has increased. Last year, almost three hundred people coming not only from Spain but also from Europe, North and Latin America, Asia, and Australia were present in the symposium. This is a great challenge for us. Some important international cooperative groups from Europe, America, and Australia collaborate with this symposium, such as GOG, NCIC, EORTC, AGO, Scottish Group, ICON, GINECO, NSGO, ANZGOG, and others.

Altered expression pattern of topoisomerase IIalpha in ovarian tumor epithelial and stromal cells after platinum-based chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of topoisomerase IIalpha (TOP2A) in epithelial and stromal cells of ovarian cancer.

METHODS

TOP2A expression was analyzed prospectively in normal and tumor epithelial and adjacent stromal cells using quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) after laser microdissection (n = 38), RNA in situ hybridization (n = 13), and immunohistochemistry (n = 69).

RESULTS

TOP2A mRNA was detected by RNA in situ hybridization in all ovarian cancer samples, with stronger hybridization signals in tumor epithelial cells compared to adjacent stromal cells. The same expression pattern was found by immunohistochemistry (P = .0001). Very interestingly, specific change was found in recurrent ovarian cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy: TOP2A expression decreased in tumor epithelial cells of recurrent ovarian cancer compared to primary ovarian cancer (P = .056), whereas it increased in tumor-adjacent stromal cells in carboplatin-treated recurrent tumors compared to primary ovarian cancer (P = .023).

CONCLUSION

TOP2A mRNA and protein expression in ovarian cancer exhibits specific patterns in tumor epithelial and adjacent stromal cells, which are differentially modulated after platinum-based chemotherapy. These data support the recently discovered importance of the stromal compartment in tumor progression and suggest that tumor stromal cells might be relevant to the development of chemotherapy resistance in ovarian cancer.

Cytoreduction combined with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion chemotherapy in advanced/recurrent ovarian cancer patients: The experience of National Cancer Institute of Milan

AIMS

We report the effects of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) in the treatment of advanced/recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) on survival, morbidity and mortality.

PATIENTS

Forty EOC patients were studied. Median age was 52.5 years (range: 30-68) and median follow-up 26.1 months (range: 0.3-117.6). Most patients presented advanced disease (stage III/IV). Previous systemic chemotherapy included cisplatin-based, taxol-based or taxol/platinum containing regimens.

RESULTS

After the CRS, 33 patients presented no macroscopic residual disease. Five-year overall survival was 15%; the mean overall and progression-free survivals were 41.4 and 23.9 months, respectively. The morbidity, toxicity and mortality rates were 5%, 15% and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that CRS + IPHP merits further evaluation by a formal prospective trial.

Epidoxorubicin versus no treatment as consolidation therapy in advanced ovarian cancer: results from a phase II study

To compare the effect of epidoxorubicin given for 4 months versus no treatment in the survival of patients with advanced ovarian cancer and complete pathologic response after first-line surgery and chemotherapy with platinum-based schedules, we conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Patients with histologic diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer FIGO stage III or IV at first diagnosis; complete pathologic response at second-look laparotomy/laparoscopy or complete clinic response; and those who have had first-line therapy including surgery and one regimen containing cisplatin or carboplatinum were eligible for the study and were randomly allocated to epidoxorubicin 120 mg/sqm or no treatment. A total of 64 women were allocated to epidoxorubicin and 74 to no treatment. There were 20 and 19 deaths, respectively, in the epidoxorubicin and no-treatment groups. The 3-year percent overall survival was 79.0% and 78.7%, respectively, in the no-treatment and epidoxorubicin groups (log-rank test, P= 0.93).

Cancer-associated serum antigen level: a novel prognostic indicator for survival in patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma

The aim was to examine the value of the pretherapeutic serum cancer-associated serum antigen (CASA) level as a prognostic factor for survival in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Serum levels of CASA and cancer antigen (CA)125 were prospectively determined in 70 consecutive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer before the start of second-line chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival were performed. The median level of serum CASA was 6.5 U/mL (range: 0.2-1437 U/mL). Univariate analysis showed that patients with a CASA level >10.0 U/mL had significantly shorter survival than patients with CASA level < or =10.0 U/mL (P= 0.002). Using different CASA cutoff levels (6.0, 6.5, and 10.0 U/mL), multivariate Cox analyses identified CASA as an independent prognostic factor for survival at every cutoff level. The strongest prognostic function for CASA was found at a cutoff level of 10.0 U/mL (>10 vs < or =10 U/mL; hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-4.7; P < 0.001). The pretreatment CA125 level was not found to be significantly associated with survival by any of the cutoffs (35, 65, 132, and 339 U/mL). A pretreatment elevated level of the tumor marker CASA is an adverse prognostic factor for survival in patients with ovarian cancer relapse.

Consolidation and maintenance treatments for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in complete response after first-line chemotherapy: A review of the literature

Most patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer experience objective responses to paclitaxel/platinum-based chemotherapy, but responses are generally short-lived and the clinical outcome is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, the strategy to consolidate and to prolong the duration of response is very attractive. Different consolidation or maintenance treatments have been attempted, such as whole abdomen radiotherapy, intraperitoneal chromic phosphate, radioimmunotherapy, intraperitoneal chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic support, prolonged administration of the first-line regimen, second-line single-agent chemotherapy, and biological agents. Clinical studies have given conflicting, inconclusive, and generally disappointing results. A recent US randomised trial appeared to show that the prolonged administration of single-agent paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) significantly improved the progression-free survival of complete responders to paclitaxel/platinum-based chemotherapy. Alternative less toxic, and probably more effective schedules of administration of chemotherapy (i.e. weekly paclitaxel) might assure a better balance between quality of life and anti-tumor activity in patients previously exposed to chemotherapy.

Review of gemcitabine-based combinations for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

Gemcitabine, an analog of deoxycytidine, is an anticancer nucleoside with proven activity in different solid malignancies. The efficacy of gemcitabine as a single agent or as part of a combination treatment has been evaluated in several trials, and antitumor activity has been observed in patients with sensitivity and resistance to both platinum and paclitaxel. In this context, preclinical studies have shown that gemcitabine-based combinations increase the cytotoxic action of the treatment and can potentially overcome drug resistance. The toxicity profile of gemcitabine, and its proven action in relapsed ovarian cancer, allows for the development of a hypothesis stating that a specific choice of drugs with different mechanisms and non-cross-resistance can increase the chance of response and prolong its duration and that of other outcome measures. This article provides an update of new clinical approaches with gemcitabine in combination with other nonplatinum drugs for the management of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Relationship Between Time Interval From Primary Surgery to the Start of Taxane- Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Clinical Outcome of Patients With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Retrospective Italian Study

Purpose

To assess whether the interval from primary surgery to the start of taxane- plus platinum-based chemotherapy has any impact on the clinical outcome of advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Patients and Methods

The study was conducted on 313 patients who underwent surgery followed by taxane- plus platinum-based chemotherapy. The median follow-up of survivors was 30.7 months (range, 6 to 109 months).

Results

The 25%, 50%, and 75% quantiles of intervals from surgery to the start of chemotherapy were 11, 21, and 31 days, respectively. After the sixth cycle, 102 patients achieved a pathologic complete response at second-look surgery and 98 obtained a clinical complete response but were not submitted to second-look surgery. Taking into consideration the best assessed response, a complete (either clinical or pathologic) response was found in 200 patients. Residual disease (≤ 1 v > 1 cm; P < .0001) and ascites (absent v present; P = .003) were independent predictive factors for achieving a complete response, whereas residual disease (P = .001) and stage (IIc to III v IV; P = .04) were independent prognostic variables for survival. Conversely, statistical analyses failed to detect significant differences in complete response rates and survival among patients with an interval from surgery to chemotherapy shorter than 11 days, 12 to 21 days, 22 to 31 days, and longer than 31 days.

Conclusion

The interval from surgery to the start of taxane- plus platinum-based chemotherapy seems to have neither a predictive value for response to treatment nor a prognostic relevance for survival of advanced ovarian cancer patients.

The epigenetics of ovarian cancer drug resistance and resensitization

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal of all gynecologic neoplasms. Early-stage malignancy is frequently asymptomatic and difficult to detect and thus, by the time of diagnosis, most women have advanced disease. Most of these patients, although initially responsive, eventually develop and succumb to drug-resistant metastases. The success of typical postsurgical regimens, usually a platinum/taxane combination, is limited by primary tumors being intrinsically refractory to treatment and initially responsive tumors becoming refractory to treatment, due to the emergence of drug-resistant tumor cells. This review highlights a prominent role for epigenetics, particularly aberrant DNA methylation and histone acetylation, in both intrinsic and acquired drug-resistance genetic pathways in ovarian cancer. Administration of therapies that reverse epigenetic "silencing" of tumor suppressors and other genes involved in drug response cascades could prove useful in the management of drug-resistant ovarian cancer patients. In this review, we summarize recent advances in the use of methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibitors and possible synergistic combinations of these to achieve maximal tumor suppressor gene re-expression. Moreover, when used in combination with conventional chemotherapeutic agents, epigenetic-based therapies may provide a means to resensitize ovarian tumors to the proven cytotoxic activities of conventional chemotherapeutics.

Ovarian cancer treatment: what is new

Ovarian cancer is still the fourth cause of death by cancer among women and the most fatal among gynecological tumors. The purpose of this symposium is, year after year, to report and discuss the new developments in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer, the majority of whom still present with advanced disease. It also tries to make it clear to the participants what is evidence-based and what is not. Mature data of both classic studies like GOG-111, OV-10, and more recent studies like GOG-158, AGO-OVAR-3, and the intergroup paclitaxel/epirubicin/carboplatin (TEC) versus paclitaxel/carboplatin (TC) study have been presented. Other current controversial issues included in this edition were sequential single-agent versus simultaneous administration of combination chemotherapy, the role of combination chemotherapy in second-line treatment, the role of consolidation therapy, the role of anthracyclines in the treatment, and cost-effectiviness studies in ovarian cancer. Although the main topic of the symposium is advanced disease, this edition included the results of two parallel randomized studies (ACTION and ICON1) on the treatment of early disease. In addition, new trends in early detection of ovarian cancer have been updated. The pace of new agent development has increased, and it would be helpful to have more efficient preclinical models and early phase-clinical trials to guide the selection of active agents for phase III evaluation. Reaching international consensus is a challenge but offers the opportunity to test multiple regimens more efficiently against a single-control population, rather than conducting multiple smaller studies with redundant internal controls. If indeed answers to the relevant questions are to be obtained more quickly, then, a network of current national or international groups could potentially facilitate this.

A new therapeutical approach: topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum

AIM

Topotecan and gemcitabine have demonstrated mono-activity against recurrent ovarian cancer. Both drugs affect DNA replication; in addition, topotecan inhibits DNA repair. Based on the efficacy profiles and different mechanisms of action, a phase-I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (day 1-5) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in combination with gemcitabine (day 1 + 8) every 21 days.

METHODS

Three to six patients were treated per dose-level. Patients with ovarian cancer who had failed a platinum and paclitaxel-containing therapy were enrolled. No individual dose escalation or use of cytokines were allowed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were recruited. Fifty percent of all patients were pretreated with at least two platinum-containing therapies. Eighty courses were assessable for toxicity. The MTD was reached at a dosage of 0.75 mg/m2 topotecan in combination with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. Thrombocytopenia and leucopenia were the major DLTs. The dose for phase-II trials is 0.50 mg/m2 topotecan given with 800/600 mg/m2 gemcitabine. In this dose-level only one related non-haematological adverse event > grade 2 was observed (grade 3 mycotic stomatitis) and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred. Responses were observed in six patients and stable disease in four out of 12 assessable patients. Median survival time was 15.3 (95% CI: 13.21-28.64) months.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate feasibility and the tolerability of topotecan in combination with gemcitabine in recurrent ovarian cancer patients. Based on these results a phase-II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of this new combination.

A phase II study of topotecan plus gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Second-line chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer who failed platinum and paclitaxel treatment remains a therapeutic challenge. We investigated the toxicity profile and therapeutic efficacy of a novel combination regimen, topotecan plus gemcitabine, in a clinical phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer after platinum and paclitaxel treatment were eligible to participate in this trial. Topotecan was given at an initial dose of 0.5 mg/m(2) daily (days 1-5), combined with gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) and 600 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, respectively. Precluding good tolerability, this protocol facilitated subsequent dose increases of topotecan up to 1.0 mg/m(2). The primary objective was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity, whereas secondary objectives comprised measurable and CA-125 response rates, disease-free and overall survival.

RESULTS

The twenty-one patients (median age 57 years, range 37-70 years) who were allocated to this trial received a total of 94 courses of chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 20.5 months. Topotecan dosage could be escalated to 0.75 mg/m(2) in nine patients and 1 mg/m(2) in another two patients. Dose reduction was not necessary in any case. There were no episodes of neutropenic fever, sepsis or chemotherapy-related fatalities. Only one patient developed CTC grade 4 leukopenia after the first treatment cycle, whereas three patients showed grade 3/4 anaemia. Five patients experienced thrombocytopenia grade 4 without clinical sequelae. Non-hematological toxicities were mild and rare. Eleven patients could be evaluated for clinical tumour response, with three complete, and four partial remissions. Two patients each had stable and progressive diseases. The median progression-free survival rate was 8.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.3-13.4 months]. The median overall survival rate was 21.1 months (95% CI 14.8-22.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Topotecan combined with gemcitabine has a favourable toxicity profile and encouraging efficacy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

Remarks and conclusions on ovarian cancer treatment

Ovarian cancer is still the fourth cause of death by cancer among women and the most fatal among gynecological tumors. The purpose of this symposium has been to report and discuss the new developments in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer, the majority of whom still present with advanced disease. It also tries to make clear to the participants what is evidence-based and what is not. Although the main topic of the symposium is advanced disease, this edition included some updated information on the treatment of early disease under the heading "is early disease really early"; the importance of screening and molecular approaches are highlighted. In addition studies reported in the literature on the role of chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy in high-risk patients with early ovarian cancer have been updated. The pace of new agent development has increased, and it would be helpful to have more efficient preclinical models and early phase-clinical trials to guide the selection of active agents for phase III evaluation. Reaching international consensus is a challenge, but offers the opportunity to test multiple regimens more efficiently against a single control population, rather than conducting multiple smaller studies with redundant internal controls. If indeed answers to the relevant questions are to be obtained more quickly, then a network of current national or international groups could potentially facilitate this.