Do Patients Undergoing MitraClip Implantation Require Routine ICU Admission?

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in patients with mitral regurgitation and cardiogenic shock: a new therapeutic target

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiogenic shock with significant mitral regurgitation portends a poor prognosis with limited therapeutic options. Herein, we review the available evidence regarding the patient characteristics, management, impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) on hemodynamics, and clinical outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock and mitral regurgitation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several observational studies and systematic reviews have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of TEER in cardiogenic shock complicated by degenerative or functional mitral regurgitation. Surgical interventions for mitral regurgitation remain limited owing to the risk profile of patients in cardiogenic shock. TEER has been studied in both degenerative and functional mitral regurgitation and remains feasible in the critically ill population. Moreover, TEER is associated with reduction in mitral regurgitation and improvement in-hospital and long-term mortality.

SUMMARY

TEER remains a promising therapeutic option in cardiogenic shock complicated by significant mitral regurgitation, but additional research is required to identify patient and procedural characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and the optimal time for intervention. Moreover, future randomized controlled trials are in progress to evaluate the potential benefit of TEER against medical management in cardiogenic shock and mitral regurgitation.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair in severe secondary mitral regurgitation: Analysis of index hospitalization and economic evaluation based on the MITRA-FR trial

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous mitral valve repair (pMVR) is reimbursed in France for severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR), but French data regarding the hospitalization index stay are lacking.

AIMS

Our objectives were to describe the index hospitalization stay and to evaluate the cost of hospital stay for pMVR used in SMR.

METHODS

A secondary evaluation based on patients who were randomized to the intervention group of the MITRA-FR study was undertaken. The economic evaluation was conducted according to the French hospital perspective. Medical resource use was estimated using specific data collected from patients enrolled in the MITRA-FR study and non-specific data from national statistics.

RESULTS

The population was represented by 144 patients who underwent pMVR at 33 French centres. There was a mean±standard deviation of 7.9±1.5 hospital staff during procedures. The mean procedure duration was 154±68 minutes and increased with the number of implanted clips. Median total length of stay was 8 days. The occurrence of a serious adverse event was not associated with an increased risk of admission to the critical care unit, but was associated with an increased length of stay. The mean total cost was 28,025±3424€, which includes 21,547€ for the cost of medical devices used during pMVR and 6478±3424€ for other costs.

CONCLUSION

The cost of pMVR is substantial for patients with SMR, which advocates for further efforts to identify the patients with SMR who are likely to derive a clear clinical benefit from the procedure.

A Narrative Review for Cardiac Anesthesiologists of the 2019 Expert Consensus on Operator and Institutional Recommendations for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention

US Food and Drug Administration approval of the edge-to-edge clip repair device (MitraClip; Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) in 2013 led to wide adoption of the device for treatment of severe primary mitral regurgitation in patients unsuitable for surgery. Demonstration of favorable outcomes in the setting of secondary mitral regurgitation by the Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation (COAPT) trial in 2019 provided an additional impetus to the transcatheter mitral interventional program. The role of the cardiac anesthesia service also is expanding to echocardiography services for these patients outside of the procedure room. Moreover, cardiac anesthesiologists serve on the multidisciplinary team that is involved in clinical decision-making pertaining to patient selection, optimization, and intervention. This document has direct implications for the cardiac anesthesiologist involved in the care of these patients because a broader understanding of pertinent issues is essential to function as an effective clinical member within the multidisciplinary team. As such, this narrative review serves to highlight the salient features of the "2019 AATS/ACC/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: Operator and Institutional Recommendations and Requirements for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention: A Joint Report of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, the American College of Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons," focuses on issues pertinent to the cardiac anesthesiologist, and provides an outline for the clinical context and evolution of transcatheter mitral valve interventions.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Cardiogenic Shock and Mitral Regurgitation: A Patient-Level, Multicenter Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) in patients with cardiogenic shock and significant mitral regurgitation (MR).

BACKGROUND

Patients in cardiogenic shock with severe MR have a poor prognosis in the setting of conventional medical therapy. Because of its favorable safety profile, TMVr is being increasingly used as an acute therapy in this population, though its efficacy remains unknown.

METHODS

A multicenter, collaborative, patient-level analysis was conducted. Patients with cardiogenic shock and moderate to severe (3+) or severe (4+) MR who were not surgical candidates were treated with TMVr. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, heart failure (HF) hospitalization, and the combined event rate of 90-day mortality and HF hospitalization following dichotomization by TMVr device success.

RESULTS

Between January 2011 and February 2019, 141 patients across 14 institutions met the inclusion criteria. In-hospital mortality occurred in 22 patients (15.6%), at 90 days in 38 patients (29.5%), and at one year in 55 patients (42.6%). Median length of hospital stay following TMVr was 10 days (interquartile range: 6 to 20 days). HF hospitalization occurred in 26 patients (18.4%) at a median of 73 days (interquartile range: 26 to 546 days). When stratified by TMVr procedural results, successful TMVr reduced rates of in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13 to 0.98; p = 0.04), 90-day mortality (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.78; p = 0.01), and the composite of 90-day mortality and HF hospitalization (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.90; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

TMVr may improve short- and intermediate-term mortality in high-risk patients with cardiogenic shock and moderate to severe MR. Randomized studies are needed to definitively establish MR as a therapeutic target in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Our Anaesthetic Experiences in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Mitraclip Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous mitraclip implantation system, is a new technique developed for patients with high surgical risks. It is generally performed in a catheterisation laboratory with the guidance of fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography. In this study, we aimed to share our experiences on anaesthetic in patients undergoing mitraclip implantation under general anaesthesia.

METHODS

Eighty four patients with severe, symptomatic mitral insufficiency, who had undergone MitraClip implantation under general anaesthesia between July 2012 and March 2015 (54 male, 30 female; mean age: 68.5±10.2 years) were retrospectively investigated in terms of anaesthetic management.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients undergoing percutaneous mitraclip implantation under general anaesthesia, 84.5% had sodium thiopental and 75% had midazolam for anaesthesia induction. For the maintenance of anaesthesia, 57% of the patients were reported to have sevoflurane, whereas the rest had desflurane. The mean duration of the procedure and anaesthesia was 140.9±48.2 mins and 165.7±50.6 min, respectively. Seventy seven patients were transported to the intensive care unit and intubated after the procedure. The median extubation time was 3 h. Length of stay in the intensive care unit was 2 days, whereas it was 4 days for hospital stay. One patient died during the procedure and six patients died after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous mitraclip implantation procedure is quite difficult for anaesthesiologists because of the procedure itself and the population on which the procedure is performed. The primary aim of anaesthesia management is to provide haemodynamic stability. The preoperative preparation and anaesthesia methods should be the same as for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. It is reported that as the experience regarding this subject increases, success of the procedure increases, with better protected haemodynamic stability, less inotropic and vasopressor requirement and shorter length of hospital stay.

Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip(®) can be performed without general anesthesia and without conscious sedation

BACKGROUND

General anesthesia is known to be associated with an increased risk for complications, especially in elderly and multi-morbid patients, the primary target population of the MitraClip(®) technique. The aim is to assess whether general anesthesia and even conscious sedation can be avoided during the MitraClip(®) procedure.

METHODS

A total of 91 consecutive patients who underwent MitraClip(®) implantation [median 77 years, (IQR 72-83), 40 % female] were retrospectively analyzed. The first 26 patients were treated in general anesthesia. Afterwards, local anesthesia was chosen as primary anesthetic approach. Altogether, 28 (31 %) patients received general anesthesia, local anesthesia was performed in 35 (38 %) patients with sedation and in 28 (31 %) patients without sedation.

RESULTS

The respective patient groups were similar regarding their baseline characteristics. Procedural success (successful implantation of at least one clip and post-procedure MR grade ≤2) was achieved in 89 % with no difference between the groups (93 % in general anesthesia, 89 % in local anesthesia with sedation, 86 % in local anesthesia without sedation, p = ns). No difference regarding hospital complications was noted. Local anesthesia with and without sedation was associated with less necessity for ICU/IMC stay (100 % in general anesthesia, 14 % in local anesthesia with sedation, 14 % in local anesthesia without sedation; p < 0.0001). One-year estimated survival was not significantly different among the groups (63, 82 and 75 %; p = ns).

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip(®) can be performed without general anesthesia and even without conscious sedation with similar procedural success and complication rates.