Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in a Patient With Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report

Outcome of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in patients with liver cirrhosis: a nationwide population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used for life support in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). However, there have been no studies evaluating the outcome of ECMO support in patients with LC.

METHODS

Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) database, we retrospectively evaluated patients with LC who received veno-venous or veno-arterial ECMO between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2013. The outcomes included ECMO-related complications, in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality and long-term outcomes in patients with and without LC.

RESULTS

A total of 7003 patients who received ECMO, of whom 233 (3.3%) had LC, were eligible for analysis. The LC patients who received ECMO support had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality than the non-LC group (76.4% vs 60.7%; odds ratio 1.97; 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.70). The LC group also had a higher risk of complications, including de novo dialysis and massive blood transfusion with >10 units of red blood cells. Patients ≥65 years of age, patients with respiratory disease, patients with hypoalbuminaemia and liver transplant patients had higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality. The mortality rates for patients with 2 or more risk factors were 90.3% and 95.8%, respectively. LC was associated with a higher incidence of all-cause mortality and liver-related outcomes during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings raise questions regarding the utility of ECMO for LC patients, especially when >2 risk factors have been identified. ECMO support for LC patients should be used with caution and with careful patient selection.

Cirrhotic Cardiomyopathy - A Veiled Threat

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) is defined as cardiac dysfunction in patients with liver cirrhosis without pre-existing cardiac disease. According to the definition established by the World Congress of Gasteroenterology in 2005, the diagnosis of CCM includes criteria reflecting systolic dysfunction, impaired diastolic relaxation, and electrophysiological disturbances. Because of minimal or even absent clinical symptoms and/or echocardiographic signs at rest according to the 2005 criteria, CCM diagnosis is often missed or delayed in most clinically-stable cirrhotic patients. However, cardiac dysfunction progresses in time and contributes to the pathogenesis of hepatorenal syndrome and increased morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation, surgery or other invasive procedures in cirrhotic patients. Therefore, a comprehensive cardiovascular assessment using newer techniques for echocardiographic evaluation of systolic and diastolic function, allowing the diagnosis of CCM in the early stage of subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction, should be included in the screening process of liver transplant candidates and patients with cirrhosis in general. The present review aims to summarize the most important pathophysiological aspects of CCM, the usefulness of contemporary cardiovascular imaging techniques and parameters in the diagnosis of CCM, the current therapeutic options, and the importance of early diagnosis of cardiovascular impairment in cirrhotic patients.

Acute heart failure after liver transplantation: A narrative review

Acute heart failure (AHF) is an under recognized yet potentially lethal complication after liver transplantation (LT) surgery. The increase in incidence of liver transplantation amongst high-risk patients and the leniency in the criteria for transplantation, predisposes these patients to postoperative AHF and the antecedent morbidity and mortality. The inability of conventional preoperative cardiovascular testing to accurately identify patients at risk for post-LT AHF poses a considerable challenge to clinicians caring for these patients. Even if high-risk patients are identified, there is considerable ambiguity in the candidacy for transplantation as well as optimization strategies that could potentially prevent the development of AHF in the postoperative period. The intraoperative and postoperative management of patients who develop AHF is also challenging and requires a well-coordinated multidisciplinary approach. The use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with refractory heart failure has the potential to improve outcomes but its use in this complex patient population can be associated with significant complications and requires a stringent risk-benefit analysis on a case-by-case basis.