Anemia impact and management: focus on patient needs and the use of erythropoietic agents

Management of anaemia in oncohaematological patients treated with biosimilar epoetin alfa: results of an Italian observational, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Many patients with solid tumours or nonmyeloid haematopoietic tumours develop symptomatic anaemia, which has a major impact on quality of life (QoL). The efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in improving QoL and reducing blood transfusions has been widely demonstrated. Binocrit® (biosimilar epoetin alfa) is an ESA indicated in the European Union for treating chemotherapy-induced anaemia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Binocrit® on haemoglobin (Hb) levels in anaemic cancer patients in Italian clinical practice.

METHODS

The ANEMONE study was a national, longitudinal, retrospective, multicentre observational study. Patients had to be 18 years or older, with a solid tumour or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease or multiple myeloma, receiving chemotherapy, and treated with Binocrit® to manage chemotherapy-induced anaemia. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with a Hb increase ⩾1 g/dl during the first 4 weeks and with a Hb increase ⩾2 g/dl during the first 12 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 245 patients were enrolled and 215 patients were evaluable for statistical analysis. In the first 4 weeks, 49.3% of patients showed an increase in Hb of ⩾1 g/dl: 45.5% in patients with solid tumours and 52.1% in patients with haematological malignancies. In the first 12 weeks, 51.6% of patients showed an increase in Hb of ⩾2 g/dl (48.4% solid tumours, 54.2% haematological diseases). Treatment with Binocrit® was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the effectiveness and safety of Binocrit® for chemotherapy-induced anaemia in routine practice in patients with solid tumours, lymphoma and myeloma.

Assessing symptom burden using the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: results of a multicenter, open-label study (SURPASS) of patients treated with darbepoetin-alpha at a dose of 200 microg every 2 weeks

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer who are receiving chemotherapy often experience chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA), which is associated with symptoms that reduce quality of life. The M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) is a brief, self-rating assessment scale that measures the severity of core symptoms and symptom interference with function. The current study used the MDASI to prospectively assess the correlation between hemoglobin and self-perceived cancer-related symptoms in a large patient population with CIA who were receiving darbepoetin-alpha at a dose of 200 mug every 2 weeks.

METHODS

Eligible patients enrolled in this multicenter, open-label study were age > or =18 years, had a nonmyeloid malignancy, were receiving multicycle chemotherapy, and were anemic (hemoglobin < or = 11 g/dL). Hemoglobin was measured every 2 weeks; the MDASI was administered weekly. For hemoglobin-based endpoints, patients were stratified by baseline hemoglobin (< 10 g/dL or > or =10 g/dL).

RESULTS

Of 2422 enrolled patients, 2401 received > or =1 dose of darbepoetin-alpha. Eighty percent of patients (95% confidence limit, 78-82 patients) achieved target hemoglobin levels (> or =11 g/dL) during the study. Patients with a baseline hemoglobin < 10 g/dL had a greater increase in hemoglobin, took longer to achieve the target hemoglobin, and received more red blood cell transfusions than patients with a baseline hemoglobin > or =10 g/dL. The percentage of patients with moderate to severe MDASI scores (> or =5 points) for fatigue, distress, loss of appetite, disturbed sleep, and interference with function was reduced during the study. Improvement in symptom burden was associated with an increase in hemoglobin concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with darbepoetin-alpha at a dose of 200 mug every 2 weeks is associated with improvement in symptom burden as measured by the MDASI, a simple tool that may improve symptom management for cancer patients with CIA.

Anaemia in patients with cancer: role of inflammatory activity on iron metabolism and severity of anaemia

Hepcidin has been proposed as an important factor in the pathogenesis of the anaemia of chronic disease (ACD). The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between anaemia and inflammatory activity in patients with solid tumours. Patients were classified as having iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) (hypoferremia and hypoferretinemia), ACD (hypoferremia, normal or increased serum ferritin) and anaemia related to cancer (ARC) (no abnormalities in iron status). Serum pro-hepcidin, IL-6, C-reactive protein (CRP) and iron status parameters were measured using commercial kits. CRP and IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with ACD when compared to IDA, ARC and non anaemic patients (P < 0.005). Serum pro-hepcidin levels were not different among all studied groups (P = 0.138). A negative correlation was observed between haemoglobin and serum ferritin, CRP and IL-6 levels only in group of ACD. Serum pro-hepcidin concentrations were not correlated with degree of anaemia or iron metabolism parameters. According to our results the inflammatory activity represented by high levels of IL-6 and CRP are involved in the pathogenesis of ACD, probably due to the action of inflammation on iron metabolism, but not in ARC. It was not possible to demonstrate a significant effect of pro-hepcidin on the anaemia in cancer patients.

Effectiveness versus convenience: patient preferences for an erythropoietic agent to treat cancer-related anemia

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient preferences across two attributes--effectiveness and convenience--in the selection of an erythropoietic agent to treat chemotherapy-related anemia.

METHODS

During 2004, 500 adults with solid tumors and anemia were recruited through 50 oncologists' offices across the USA. Data were collected through self-administered questionnaires, divided into two parts. The first, completed by the provider, captured clinical information and providers' perceptions of patient preferences. The second, completed by the patient, recorded knowledge, experiences, and preferences regarding anemia and its treatments. Patient preferences, the relative importance of effectiveness (time to noticeable relief of fatigue) and convenience (number of provider visits required in an 8-week period), were measured using a choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis. Each attribute was assessed at three levels (4, 6, or 8 weeks/visits).

RESULTS

467 providers (93%) and 438 patients (88%) completed the preference sections. When choosing a medication to treat anemia, 77% of providers viewed effectiveness as more important to patients than convenience. Similarly, patients had a greater preference for effectiveness than convenience. Relative preference weights were significantly higher for 4- versus 6-week effectiveness (0.61 vs. 0.09, p < 0.001) and 6- versus 8-week effectiveness (0.09 vs. -0.70, p = 0.004). Overall, time to effectiveness was twice as important to patients as the number of visits.

LIMITATIONS

Only two attributes were included in the CBC, which did not control for bias from respondent characteristics or experiences.

CONCLUSION

When evaluating an erythropoietic agent to treat chemotherapy-related anemia, both providers and patients view effectiveness as more important than convenience.

Randomized comparison of epoetin alfa (40,000 U weekly) and darbepoetin alfa (200 microg every 2 weeks) in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy

This is the first randomized, open-label, multicenter trial designed and powered to directly compare the hemoglobin (Hb) response to epoetin alfa (EPO), 40,000 U once weekly (QW), with that to darbepoetin alfa (DARB), 200 microg every 2 weeks (Q2W), in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy (CT). Transfusion requirements, quality of life (QOL), and safety also were evaluated. Adults with solid tumors scheduled to receive CT for > or =12 weeks and with baseline Hb < or =11 g/dl were randomized to receive either EPO 40,000 U QW (n = 178) or DARB 200 microg Q2W (n = 180) s.c. for up to 16 weeks. Doses were increased for nonresponders (Hb increase <1 g/dl) after 4 (EPO) or 6 (DARB) weeks, as per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and were reduced for a rapid rise in Hb (>1.3 g/dl [EPO] or >1.0 g/dl [DARB] within any 2-week period) or for an Hb level >13 g/dl. The proportion of patients achieving a > or =1-g/dl Hb rise by week 5, the primary end point, was significantly higher with EPO (47.0%) than with DARB (32.5%), and EPO-treated patients achieved a > or =1-g/dl Hb increase significantly earlier than those receiving DARB (median, 35 days versus 46 days). The mean increase in Hb from baseline was significantly higher at weeks 5, 9, 13, and the end of the study with EPO than with DARB. The number of units transfused per patient was significantly lower for the EPO group than for the DARB group. The proportions of patients requiring transfusions, mean QOL improvements, and tolerability profiles were similar in the two groups.

New EORTC guidelines for the treatment of anaemia in patients with cancer: implications for nursing practice

Anaemia and associated fatigue are common problems in patients with cancer, and fatigue is considered by patients with cancer to be their most limiting symptom. The introduction of erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs) has greatly improved the management of anaemia; however, many European patients with cancer-related anaemia are untreated because of a lack of awareness among healthcare professionals of the benefits of anaemia treatment to patients, or because of regional differences in treatment practices. Recently, the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) developed the first European evidence-based guidelines for the use of ESPs in cancer-related anaemia in order to facilitate and standardize the assessment and management of the condition. These guidelines, and the implications for oncology nurses in implementing them in practice, are discussed.

Optimising the management of anaemia in patients with cancer with practice guidelines using erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins

Anaemia, a common problem in patients with cancer, usually leads to severe fatigue, which can dramatically impair patients' quality of life (QOL). Nurses are in the ideal position to assess and monitor cancer patients at risk of anaemia and recommend appropriate supportive care measures to alleviate anaemia-related symptoms. Erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs) can increase haemoglobin levels, reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions, and improve QOL in patients with cancer and anaemia. Evidence-based guidelines published by national and international organisations make specific recommendations for the appropriate use of ESPs. Nurses are key members of the multidisciplinary teams that develop practice-specific protocols, which are based on the national guidelines. The practice guidelines should describe protocols to identify patients at risk for anaemia and interventions to correct anaemia, with specific details on the choice of ESP and when such interventions should be initiated and halted. In addition, nurses should also recommend strategies to reduce patient burden, such as patient self-administration with prefilled pens or synchronisation of visits for ESPs with chemotherapy visits, which is made possible with the once-every-3-weeks extended dosing with darbepoetin alfa. The implementation of such practice guidelines should improve the quality of care provided to patients.