1
|
Buckle T, Rietbergen DDD, de Wit-van der Veen L, Schottelius M. Lessons learned in application driven imaging agent design for image-guided surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:3040-3054. [PMID: 38900308 PMCID: PMC11300579 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06791-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
To meet the growing demand for intraoperative molecular imaging, the development of compatible imaging agents plays a crucial role. Given the unique requirements of surgical applications compared to diagnostics and therapy, maximizing translational potential necessitates distinctive imaging agent designs. For effective surgical guidance, exogenous signatures are essential and are achievable through a diverse range of imaging labels such as (radio)isotopes, fluorescent dyes, or combinations thereof. To achieve optimal in vivo utility a balanced molecular design of the tracer as a whole is required, which ensures a harmonious effect of the imaging label with the affinity and specificity (e.g., pharmacokinetics) of a pharmacophore/targeting moiety. This review outlines common design strategies and the effects of refinements in the molecular imaging agent design on the agent's pharmacological profile. This includes the optimization of affinity, pharmacokinetics (including serum binding and target mediated background), biological clearance route, the achievable signal intensity, and the effect of dosing hereon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Buckle
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne D D Rietbergen
- Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Section Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Linda de Wit-van der Veen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margret Schottelius
- Translational Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 25A, Agora, Lausanne, CH-1011, Switzerland.
- Agora, pôle de recherche sur le cancer, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Raheem SJ, Salih AK, Garcia MD, Sharpe JC, Toosi BM, Price EW. A Systematic Investigation into the Influence of Net Charge on the Biological Distribution of Radiometalated Peptides Using [ 68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE Derivatives. Bioconjug Chem 2023; 34:549-561. [PMID: 36800496 DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.3c00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
Recently, several radiometalated peptides have been approved for clinical imaging and/or therapy (theranostics) of several types of cancer; nonetheless, the primary challenge that most of these peptides confront is significant renal uptake and retention, which is often dose limiting and can cause nephrotoxicity. In response to this, numerous methods have been employed to reduce the uptake of radiometalated peptides in the kidneys, and among these is adding a linker to modulate polarity and/or charge. To better understand the influence of net charge on the biodistribution of radiometalated peptides, we selected the clinically popular construct DOTA-TATE (NETSPOT/LUTATHERA) as a model system. We synthesized derivatives using manual solid-phase peptide synthesis methods including mechanical and ultrasonic agitation to effectively yield the gold standard DOTA-TATE and a series of derivatives with different net charges (+2, +1, 0, -1, -2). Dynamic PET imaging from 0 to 90 min in healthy female mice (CD1) revealed high accumulation and retention of activity in the kidneys for the net-neutral (0) charged [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE and even higher for positively charged derivatives, whereas negatively charged derivatives exhibited low accumulation and fast renal excretion. Ex vivo biodistribution at 2 h post injection demonstrated a significant retention of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE (∼74 %ID/g) in the kidneys, which increased as the net positive charge per molecule increased to +1 and +2 (∼272 %ID/g and ∼333 %ID/g, respectively), but the -1 and -2 net charged molecules exhibited lower renal uptake (∼15 %ID/g and 16 %ID/g, respectively). Interestingly, the net -2 charged [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-(Glu)2-PEG4-TATE was stable in blood serum but had much higher healthy organ uptake (lungs, liver, spleen) than the net -1 compound, suggesting instability in vivo. Although the [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-PEG4-TATE derivative with a net charge of 0 also showed a decrease in kidney uptake, it also showed instability in blood serum and in vivo. Despite the superior pharmacokinetics of the net -1 charged [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Glu-PEG4-TATE in healthy mice with respect to kidney uptake and overall profile, dynamic PET images and ex vivo biodistribution in male mice (NSG) bearing AR42J (SSTR2 overexpressing) subcutaneous tumor xenografts showed significantly diminished tumor uptake when compared to the gold standard [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE. Taken together, these findings indicate unambiguously that kidney uptake and retention are significantly influenced by the net charge of peptide-based radiotracers. In addition, it was illustrated that the negatively charged peptides had substantially decreased kidney uptake, but in this instantiation the tumor uptake was also impaired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shvan J Raheem
- Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, S7N-5C9, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Akam K Salih
- Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, S7N-5C9, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Moralba Dominguez Garcia
- Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, S7N-5C9, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Jessica C Sharpe
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, S7N-5B4, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Behzad M Toosi
- Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, S7N-5B4, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Eric W Price
- Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Science, University of Saskatchewan, 110 Science Place, S7N-5C9, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kanellopoulos P, Nock BA, Greifenstein L, Baum RP, Roesch F, Maina T. [ 68Ga]Ga-DATA 5m-LM4, a PET Radiotracer in the Diagnosis of SST 2R-Positive Tumors: Preclinical and First Clinical Results. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232314590. [PMID: 36498918 PMCID: PMC9740503 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232314590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiolabeled somatostatin subtype 2 receptor (SST2R)-antagonists have shown advantageous profiles for cancer theranostics compared with agonists. On the other hand, the newly introduced hybrid chelator (6-pentanoic acid)-6-(amino)methyl-1,4-diazepinetriacetate (DATA5m) rapidly binds Ga-68 (t1/2: 67.7 min) at much lower temperature, thus allowing for quick access to "ready-for-injection" [68Ga]Ga-tracers in hospitals. We herein introduce [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 for PET/CT imaging of SST2R-positive human tumors. LM4 was obtained by 4Pal3/Tyr3-substitution in the known SST2R antagonist LM3 (H-DPhe-c[DCys-Tyr-DAph(Cbm)-Lys-Thr-Cys]-DTyr-NH2) and DATA5m was coupled at the N-terminus for labeling with radiogallium (Ga-67/68). [67Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 was evaluated in HEK293-SST2R cells and mice models in a head-to-head comparison with [67Ga]Ga-DOTA-LM3. Clinical grade [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 was prepared and injected in a neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patient for PET/CT imaging. DATA5m-LM4 displayed high SST2R binding affinity. [67Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 showed markedly higher uptake in HEK293-SST2R cells versus [67Ga]Ga-DOTA-LM3 and was stable in vivo. In HEK293-SST2R xenograft-bearing mice, it achieved longer tumor retention and less kidney uptake than [67Ga]Ga-DOTA-LM3. [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 accurately visualized tumor lesions with high contrast on PET/CT. In short, [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m-LM4 has shown excellent prospects for the PET/CT diagnosis of SST2R-positive tumors, further highlighting the benefits of Ga-68 labeling in a hospital environment via the DATA5m-chelator route.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Berthold A. Nock
- Molecular Radiopharmacy, INRaSTES, NCSR “Demokritos”, GR-15310 Athens, Greece
| | - Lukas Greifenstein
- CURANOSTICUM Wiesbaden-Frankfurt, DKD Helios Klinik, D-65191 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Richard P. Baum
- CURANOSTICUM Wiesbaden-Frankfurt, DKD Helios Klinik, D-65191 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Frank Roesch
- Department Chemie, Standort TRIGA, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55126 Mainz, Germany
| | - Theodosia Maina
- Molecular Radiopharmacy, INRaSTES, NCSR “Demokritos”, GR-15310 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-210-650-3908 (ext. 3891)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iravani A, Parihar AS, Akhurst T, Hicks RJ. Molecular imaging phenotyping for selecting and monitoring radioligand therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Cancer Imaging 2022; 22:25. [PMID: 35659779 PMCID: PMC9164531 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00465-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) is an umbrella term that includes a widely heterogeneous disease group including well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), and aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The site of origin of the NENs is linked to the intrinsic tumour biology and is predictive of the disease course. It is understood that NENs demonstrate significant biologic heterogeneity which ultimately translates to widely varying clinical presentations, disease course and prognosis. Thus, significant emphasis is laid on the pre-therapy evaluation of markers that can help predict tumour behavior and dynamically monitors the response during and after treatment. Most well-differentiated NENs express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) which make them appropriate for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). However, the treatment outcomes of PRRT depend heavily on the adequacy of patient selection by molecular imaging phenotyping not only utilizing pre-treatment SSTR PET but 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET to provide insights into the intra- or inter-tumoural heterogeneity of the metastatic disease. Molecular imaging phenotyping may go beyond patient selection and provide useful information during and post-treatment for monitoring of temporal heterogeneity of the disease and dynamically risk-stratify patients. In addition, advances in the understanding of genomic-phenotypic classifications of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas led to an archetypical example in precision medicine by utilizing molecular imaging phenotyping to guide radioligand therapy. Novel non-SSTR based peptide receptors have also been explored diagnostically and therapeutically to overcome the tumour heterogeneity. In this paper, we review the current molecular imaging modalities that are being utilized for the characterization of the NENs with special emphasis on their role in patient selection for radioligand therapy.
Collapse
|
5
|
Perspectives on translational molecular imaging and therapy: an overview of key questions to be addressed. EJNMMI Res 2022; 12:31. [PMID: 35652963 PMCID: PMC9163234 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00903-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
6
|
Bartolomei M, Berruti A, Falconi M, Fazio N, Ferone D, Lastoria S, Pappagallo G, Seregni E, Versari A. Clinical Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in Clinical Practice: A Formal Consensus Exercise. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102501. [PMID: 35626105 PMCID: PMC9140035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Well-structured international guidelines are currently available regarding the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). However, in relation to the multiplicity of treatments and the relative rarity and heterogeneity of NENs, there are many controversial issues in which clinical evidence is insufficient and for which expert opinion can be of help. A group of experts selected 14 relevant topics and formulated relative statements concerning controversial issues in several areas on diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic strategies, and patient follow-up. Specific statements have also been formulated regarding patient management on radioligand therapy (RLT), as well as in the presence of co-morbidities or bone metastases. All the statements were drafted, discussed, modified, and then approved. The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) method was used to obtain consensus. The results of this paper can facilitate the clinical approach of patients with NENs in daily practice in areas where there is scarcity or absence of clinical evidence. Abstract Many treatment approaches are now available for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). While several societies have issued guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of NENs, there are still areas of controversy for which there is limited guidance. Expert opinion can thus be of support where firm recommendations are lacking. A group of experts met to formulate 14 statements relative to diagnosis and treatment of NENs and presented herein. The nominal group and estimate-talk-estimate techniques were used. The statements covered a broad range of topics from tools for diagnosis to follow-up, evaluation of response, treatment efficacy, therapeutic sequence, and watchful waiting. Initial prognostic characterization should be based on clinical information as well as histopathological analysis and morphological and functional imaging. It is also crucial to optimize RLT for patients with a NEN starting from accurate characterization of the patient and disease. Follow-up should be patient/tumor tailored with a shared plan about timing and type of imaging procedures to use to avoid safety issues. It is also stressed that patient-reported outcomes should receive greater attention, and that a multidisciplinary approach should be mandatory. Due to the clinical heterogeneity and relative lack of definitive evidence for NENs, personalization of diagnostic–therapeutic work-up is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirco Bartolomei
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Presidio Ospedaliero Arcispedale Sant’Anna di Cona, 44124 Ferrara, Italy;
| | - Alfredo Berruti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, Medical Oncology, University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
- Correspondence:
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreas Surgical Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, San Raffaele Hospital IRCCS, Vita Salute University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncologya and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Diego Ferone
- Endocrinology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Università di Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy;
| | - Secondo Lastoria
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione G. Pascale, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giovanni Pappagallo
- School of Clinical Methodology IRCCS “Sacred Heart–Don Calabria” Hospital; 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy;
| | - Ettore Seregni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20132 Milano, Italy;
| | - Annibale Versari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Di Stasio GD, Cuccurullo V, Cascini GL, Grana CM. Tailored Molecular Imaging of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma: Which Tracer and When. Neuroendocrinology 2022; 112:927-940. [PMID: 35051937 DOI: 10.1159/000522089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma (PGL) are rare neoplasms that fall within the category of neuroendocrine tumors. In the last decade, their diagnostic algorithm has been modified to include the evaluation of molecular pathways, genotype, and biochemical phenotype, in order to correctly interpret anatomical and functional imaging results and tailor the best therapeutic choices to patients. More specifically, the identification of germline mutations has led to a three-way cluster classification: pseudo-hypoxic cluster, cluster of kinase receptor signaling and protein translation pathways, and cluster of Wnt-altered pathway. In this context, functional imaging gained a crucial role in the management of these patients in agreement with the ever-growing concept of personalized medicine. In this paper, we provide an overview of three specific molecular pathways targeted by positron-emitting tracers to image PCCs and PGLs: catecholamine metabolism, somatostatin receptors, and glucose uptake. Finally, we recommend different flow charts for use in the selection of tracers for specific clinical scenarios, based on sporadic/inherited tumor and known/unknown mutation status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vincenzo Cuccurullo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Precision Medicine, Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucio Cascini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Chiara Maria Grana
- Nuclear Medicine Division, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nephrotoxicity after radionuclide therapies. Transl Oncol 2021; 15:101295. [PMID: 34847420 PMCID: PMC8633679 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear medicine theranostics have demonstrated success with a favourable safety and efficacy profile in several malignancies. Kidneys being the primary excretory organ for most therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals are at risk of increased radiation exposure. Recognition of the mechanisms of radiation induced nephropathy and associated risk factors can help in the development of appropriate interventions to prevent and limit renal toxicity. Developments in reducing chronic radiation nephropathy following radionuclide therapies will help in avoiding the related morbidities, preserving the overall quality of life.
Radioligand therapies have opened new treatment avenues for cancer patients. They offer precise tumor targeting with a favorable efficacy-to-toxicity profile. Specifically, the kidneys, once regarded as the critical organ for radiation toxicity, also show excellent tolerance to radiation doses as high as 50–60 Gy in selected cases. However, the number of nephrons that form the structural and functional units of the kidney is determined before birth and is fixed. Thus, loss of nephrons secondary to any injury may lead to an irreversible decline in renal function over time. Our primary understanding of radiation-induced nephropathy is derived from the effects of external beam radiation on the renal tissue. With the growing adoption of radionuclide therapies, considerable evidence has been gained with regard to the occurrence of renal toxicity and its associated risk factors. In this review, we discuss the radionuclide therapies associated with the risk of nephrotoxicity, the present understanding of the factors and mechanisms that contribute to renal injury, and the current and potential methods for preventing, identifying, and managing nephrotoxicity, specifically acute onset nephropathies.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kossatz S, Beer AJ, Notni J. It's Time to Shift the Paradigm: Translation and Clinical Application of Non-αvβ3 Integrin Targeting Radiopharmaceuticals. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235958. [PMID: 34885066 PMCID: PMC8657165 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Cancer cells often present a different set of proteins on their surface than normal cells. This also applies to integrins, a class of 24 cell surface receptors which mainly are responsible for physically anchoring cells in tissues, but also fulfil a plethora of other functions. If a certain integrin is found on tumor cells but not on normal ones, radioactive molecules (named tracers) that specifically bind to this integrin will accumulate in the cancer lesion if injected into the blood stream. The emitted radiation can be detected from outside the body and allows for localization and thus, diagnosis, of cancer. Only one of the 24 integrins, the subtype αvβ3, has hitherto been thoroughly investigated in this context. We herein summarize the most recent, pertinent research on other integrins, and argue that some of these approaches might ultimately improve the clinical management of the most lethal cancers, such as pancreatic carcinoma. Abstract For almost the entire period of the last two decades, translational research in the area of integrin-targeting radiopharmaceuticals was strongly focused on the subtype αvβ3, owing to its expression on endothelial cells and its well-established role as a biomarker for, and promoter of, angiogenesis. Despite a large number of translated tracers and clinical studies, a clinical value of αvβ3-integrin imaging could not be defined yet. The focus of research has, thus, been moving slowly but steadily towards other integrin subtypes which are involved in a large variety of tumorigenic pathways. Peptidic and non-peptidic radioligands for the integrins α5β1, αvβ6, αvβ8, α6β1, α6β4, α3β1, α4β1, and αMβ2 were first synthesized and characterized preclinically. Some of these compounds, targeting the subtypes αvβ6, αvβ8, and α6β1/β4, were subsequently translated into humans during the last few years. αvβ6-Integrin has arguably attracted most attention because it is expressed by some of the cancers with the worst prognosis (above all, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma), which substantiates a clinical need for the respective theranostic agents. The receptor furthermore represents a biomarker for malignancy and invasiveness of carcinomas, as well as for fibrotic diseases, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and probably even for Sars-CoV-2 (COVID-19) related syndromes. Accordingly, the largest number of recent first-in-human applications has been reported for radiolabeled compounds targeting αvβ6-integrin. The results indicate a substantial clinical value, which might lead to a paradigm change and trigger the replacement of αvβ3 by αvβ6 as the most popular integrin in theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Kossatz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research (TranslaTUM), School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Johannes Notni
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
- TRIMT GmbH, 01454 Radeberg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-4140-6075; Fax: +49-89-4140-6949
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baum RP, Zhang J, Schuchardt C, Müller D, Mäcke H. First-in-Humans Study of the SSTR Antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Dosimetry, Safety, and Efficacy. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:1571-1581. [PMID: 33674401 PMCID: PMC8612334 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.258889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the safety, dosimetry, and efficacy of the 177Lu-labeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) antagonist DOTA-p-Cl-Phe-cyclo(d-Cys-Tyr-d-4-amino-Phe(carbamoyl)-Lys-Thr-Cys)d-Tyr-NH2 (177Lu-DOTA-LM3) in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Methods: Fifty-one patients (aged 27-76 y; mean, 51.6 ± 13.9 y) with metastatic NENs underwent peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 between August 2017 and December 2019. The median administered activity per cycle was 6.1 ± 0.88 GBq (range, 2.8-7.4 GBq). 68Ga-NODAGA-LM3 PET/CT was used for patient selection and follow-up after 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT. Morphologic and molecular responses were evaluated in accordance with RECIST 1.1 and the criteria of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Dosimetry was performed on 11 patients and compared with the SSTR agonist 177Lu-DOTATOC in 247 patients undergoing PRRT on the same dosimetry protocol. Results: Higher uptake and a longer effective half-life were found for 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 than for the agonist 177Lu-DOTATOC in the whole body and in the kidneys, spleen, and metastases, resulting in higher mean absorbed organ and tumor doses. All patients tolerated therapy without any serious acute adverse effects. Mild nausea without vomiting was observed in 5 (9.8%) patients; no other symptoms were reported. The most severe delayed adverse event was Common Terminology Criteria (CTC)-3 thrombocytopenia in 3 (5.9%) patients. Neither CTC-4 thrombocytopenia nor CTC-3-4 anemia or leukopenia was observed after treatment. No significant decline in renal function was observed, nor was hepatotoxicity. According to RECIST 1.1, disease control could be reached in 40 patients (disease control rate, 85.1%) of the 47 patients monitored after 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 PRRT, with a partial response in 17 (36.2%) and stable disease in 23 (48.9%), whereas 7 patients (14.9%) had progressive disease, and by EORTC criteria, there was complete remission in 2 patients (4.3%), partial remission in 21 (44.7%), stable disease in 18 (38.3%), and progressive disease in 6 (12.8%). Conclusion: The antagonist PRRT with 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 could be administered without severe adverse effects and was well tolerated by most patients, with thrombocytopenia occurring in only a few. No other severe adverse effects were observed; in particular, there was no nephrotoxicity. The SSTR antagonist 177Lu-DOTA-LM3 appears to be promising for PRRT, provides a favorable biodistribution and higher tumor radiation doses than SSTR agonists, and was effective in treating advanced metastatic NENs, especially in patients with low or no SSTR agonist binding, even achieving complete remission in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard P Baum
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
- CURANOSTICUM Wiesbaden-Frankfurt, Center for Advanced Radiomolecular Precision Oncology, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany;
- Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, Surgery, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; and
| | - Christiane Schuchardt
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Helmut Mäcke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective form of treatment of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, delivering modest objective tumor response rates but notable survival and symptomatic benefits. The first PRRT approved by the US Food and Drug Administration was lutetium 177-DOTATATE and is for use in adults with somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The treatment paradigm typically leads to significant improvement in symptomology coupled with an extended period of progression-free survival. Side effects are limited, with a small fraction of individuals experiencing clinically significant long-term renal or hematologic toxicity.
Collapse
|
12
|
Prior Resection of the Primary Tumor Prolongs Survival After Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy of Advanced Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Ann Surg 2021; 274:e45-e53. [PMID: 33030849 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to compare impact on survival after resection of primary tumors (PTs) after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). BACKGROUND PRRT is a highly effective therapeutic option to treat locally advanced or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 889 patients with advanced NEN (G1-G3, stage IV) treated with at least 1 cycle of PRRT. In 486 of 889 patients (55%, group 1), PT had been removed before PRRT. Group 2 constituted 403 patients (45%) with no prior PT resection. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined by 68Ga SSTR-PET/CT in all patients applying RECIST and EORTC. RESULTS Most patients had their PT in pancreas (n = 335; 38%) and small intestine (n = 284; 32%). Both groups received a mean of 4 cycles of PRRT (P = 0.835) with a mean cumulative administered radioactivity of 21.6 ± 11.7 versus 22.2 ± 11.2 GBq (P = 0.407). Median OS in group 1 was 134.0 months [confidence interval (CI): 118-147], whereas OS in group 2 was 67.0 months (CI: 60-80; hazard ratio 2.79); P < 0.001. Likewise, the median progression-free survival after first PRRT was longer in group 1 with 18.0 (CI: 15-20) months as compared to group 2 with 14.0 (CI: 15-18; hazard ratio 1.21) months; P = 0.012. CONCLUSIONS A previous resection of the PT before PRRT provides a significant survival benefit in patients with NENs stage IV.
Collapse
|
13
|
Vahidfar N, Eppard E, Farzanehfar S, Yordanova A, Fallahpoor M, Ahmadzadehfar H. An Impressive Approach in Nuclear Medicine: Theranostics. PET Clin 2021; 16:327-340. [PMID: 34053577 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Radiometal-based theranostics or theragnostics, first used in the early 2000s, is the combined application of diagnostic and therapeutic agents that target the same molecule, and represents a considerable advancement in nuclear medicine. One of the promising fields related to theranostics is radioligand therapy. For instance, the concepts of targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for imaging and therapy in prostate cancer, or somatostatin receptor targeted imaging and therapy in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are part of the field of theranostics. Combining targeted imaging and therapy can improve prognostication, therapeutic decision-making, and monitoring of the therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasim Vahidfar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Elisabeth Eppard
- Positronpharma SA, Santiago, Chile; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Saeed Farzanehfar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Maryam Fallahpoor
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ferguson S, Wuest M, Richter S, Bergman C, Dufour J, Krys D, Simone J, Jans HS, Riauka T, Wuest F. A comparative PET imaging study of 44gSc- and 68Ga-labeled bombesin antagonist BBN2 derivatives in breast and prostate cancer models. Nucl Med Biol 2020; 90-91:74-83. [PMID: 33189947 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiolabeled peptides play a central role in nuclear medicine as radiotheranostics for targeted imaging and therapy of cancer. We have recently proposed the use of metabolically stabilized GRPR antagonist BBN2 for radiolabeling with 18F and 68Ga and subsequent PET imaging of GRPRs in prostate cancer. The present work studied the impact of 44gSc- and 68Ga-labeled DOTA complexes attached to GRPR antagonist BBN2 on the in vitro GRPR binding affinity, and their biodistribution and tumor uptake profiles in MCF7 breast and PC3 prostate cancer models. METHODS DOTA-Ava-BBN2 was radiolabeled with radiometals 68Ga and 44gSc. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) affinities of peptides were assessed in PC3 prostate cancer cells. GRPR expression profiles were studied in human breast cancer tissue samples and MCF7 breast cancer cells. PET imaging of 68Ga- and 44gSc-labeled peptides was performed in MCF7 and PC3 xenografts as breast and prostate cancer models. RESULTS Radiopeptides [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 and [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-Ava BBN2 were prepared in radiochemical yields of 70-80% (decay-corrected), respectively. High binding affinities were found for both peptides (IC50 = 15 nM (natGa) and 5 nM (natSc)). Gene expression microarray analysis revealed high GRPR mRNA expression levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, which was further confirmed with Western blot and immunohistochemistry. However, PET imaging showed only low tumor uptake of both radiotracers in MCF7 xenografts ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-BBN2 (SUV60min 0.27 ± 0.06); [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-BBN2 (SUV60min 0.20 ± 0.03)). In contrast, high tumor uptake and retention were found for both radiopeptides in PC3 tumors ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-BBN2 (SUV60min 0.46 ± 0.07); [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-BBN2 (SUV60min 0.51 ± 0.11)). CONCLUSIONS Comparison of 68Ga- and 44gSc-labeled DOTA-Ava-BBN2 peptides revealed slight but noticeable differences of the radiometal with an impact on the in vitro GRPR receptor binding properties in PC3 cells. No differences were found in their in vivo biodistribution profiles in MCF7 and PC3 xenografts. Radiopeptides [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 and [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 displayed comparable tumor uptake and retention profiles with rapid blood and renal clearance profiles in both tumor models. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE The favorable PET imaging performance of [44gSc]Sc-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 in prostate cancer should warrant the development of an [43Sc]Sc-DOTA-Ava-BBN2 analog for clinical translation which comes with a main γ-line of much lower energy and intensity compared to 44gSc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Ferguson
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Melinda Wuest
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Susan Richter
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Cody Bergman
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Dufour
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Daniel Krys
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Simone
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Hans-Sonke Jans
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Terence Riauka
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Frank Wuest
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Cancer Research Institute of Northern Alberta, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med 2020; 45:604-610. [PMID: 32520503 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE As patients with progressive medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and radioiodine-refractory metastatic differentiated nonmedullary thyroid cancer (DTC) have poor prognoses and present therapeutic challenges, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) targeting the somatostatin receptor provides a promising option. This meta-analysis evaluated the therapeutic effects and outcomes of PRRT in differentiated thyroid cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and COCHRANE were systematically searched using appropriate key words. The primary therapeutic effect was the radiological response after PRRT, and the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were identified in MTC and DTC, respectively. The outcome of serious adverse events (grade 3 or 4), additional therapeutic effects of F-FDG PET/CT and biochemical (calcitonin and thyroglobulin) responses, and radionuclides for PRRT were assessed as subgroup analyses. The parameters were generated as pooled proportions. RESULTS Eleven articles with 165 patients were included (98 patients with MTC and 67 patients with DTC). PRRT achieved pooled proportions of ORR in 8.53% to 15.61%, DCR in 53.95% to 59.99%, and serious adverse events in 2.79% to 2.82% in MTC and DTC patients. F-FDG PET/CT and biochemical responses revealed similar results as the radiological response. Lu-based PRRT (ORR, 11.48%-24.52%; DCR, 61.47%-67.26%) showed better therapeutic effects than Y-based PRRT (ORR, 6.98%-13.82%; DCR, 50.86%-57.29%). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggests that PRRT could be a potential and safe strategy for MTC and DTC. In particular, PRRT with Lu exhibited improved therapeutic effects relative to PRRT with Y.
Collapse
|
16
|
Beyer T, Bidaut L, Dickson J, Kachelriess M, Kiessling F, Leitgeb R, Ma J, Shiyam Sundar LK, Theek B, Mawlawi O. What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:38. [PMID: 32517801 PMCID: PMC7285725 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00312-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncological diseases account for a significant portion of the burden on public healthcare systems with associated costs driven primarily by complex and long-lasting therapies. Through the visualization of patient-specific morphology and functional-molecular pathways, cancerous tissue can be detected and characterized non-invasively, so as to provide referring oncologists with essential information to support therapy management decisions. Following the onset of stand-alone anatomical and functional imaging, we witness a push towards integrating molecular image information through various methods, including anato-metabolic imaging (e.g., PET/CT), advanced MRI, optical or ultrasound imaging.This perspective paper highlights a number of key technological and methodological advances in imaging instrumentation related to anatomical, functional, molecular medicine and hybrid imaging, that is understood as the hardware-based combination of complementary anatomical and molecular imaging. These include novel detector technologies for ionizing radiation used in CT and nuclear medicine imaging, and novel system developments in MRI and optical as well as opto-acoustic imaging. We will also highlight new data processing methods for improved non-invasive tissue characterization. Following a general introduction to the role of imaging in oncology patient management we introduce imaging methods with well-defined clinical applications and potential for clinical translation. For each modality, we report first on the status quo and, then point to perceived technological and methodological advances in a subsequent status go section. Considering the breadth and dynamics of these developments, this perspective ends with a critical reflection on where the authors, with the majority of them being imaging experts with a background in physics and engineering, believe imaging methods will be in a few years from now.Overall, methodological and technological medical imaging advances are geared towards increased image contrast, the derivation of reproducible quantitative parameters, an increase in volume sensitivity and a reduction in overall examination time. To ensure full translation to the clinic, this progress in technologies and instrumentation is complemented by advances in relevant acquisition and image-processing protocols and improved data analysis. To this end, we should accept diagnostic images as "data", and - through the wider adoption of advanced analysis, including machine learning approaches and a "big data" concept - move to the next stage of non-invasive tumour phenotyping. The scans we will be reading in 10 years from now will likely be composed of highly diverse multi-dimensional data from multiple sources, which mandate the use of advanced and interactive visualization and analysis platforms powered by Artificial Intelligence (AI) for real-time data handling by cross-specialty clinical experts with a domain knowledge that will need to go beyond that of plain imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Beyer
- QIMP Team, Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20/4L, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Luc Bidaut
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | - John Dickson
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marc Kachelriess
- Division of X-ray imaging and CT, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, DE, Germany
| | - Fabian Kiessling
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Clinic and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 20, 52074, Aachen, DE, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Am Fallturm 1, 28359, Bremen, DE, Germany
| | - Rainer Leitgeb
- Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, AT, Austria
| | - Jingfei Ma
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lalith Kumar Shiyam Sundar
- QIMP Team, Centre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20/4L, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Theek
- Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, University Clinic and Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 20, 52074, Aachen, DE, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, Am Fallturm 1, 28359, Bremen, DE, Germany
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang J, Liu Q, Singh A, Schuchardt C, Kulkarni HR, Baum RP. Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in a Large Cohort of Patients with Advanced Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Treated with Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J Nucl Med 2020; 61:1560-1569. [PMID: 32169914 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.241414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in a large cohort of 495 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) who were treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with a long-term follow-up. Methods: The 495 patients were treated with 177Lu- or 90Y-DOTATOC/DOTATATE PRRT between February 2002 and July 2018. All subjects received both 68Ga-DOTATOC/TATE/NOC and 18F-FDG PET/CT before treatment and were followed 3-189 mo. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing (Mantel-Cox), and Cox regression analysis were performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: One hundred ninety-nine patients (40.2%) presented with pancreatic NENs, 49 with cancer of unknown primary, and 139 with midgut NENs, whereas the primary tumor was present in the rectum in 20, in the lung in 38, in the stomach in 8, and in other locations in 42. 18F-FDG PET/CT was positive in 382 (77.2%) patients and negative in 113 (22.8%) before PRRT, whereas 100% were 68Ga-DOTATOC/TATE/NOC-positive. For all patients, the median PFS and OS, defined from the start of PRRT, were 19.6 mo and 58.7 mo, respectively. Positive 18F-FDG results predicted shorter PFS (18.5 mo vs. 24.1 mo; P = 0.0015) and OS (53.2 mo vs. 83.1 mo; P < 0.001) than negative 18F-FDG results. Among the cases of pancreatic NENs, the median OS was 52.8 mo in 18F-FDG-positive subjects and 114.3 mo in 18F-FDG-negative subjects (P = 0.0006). For all patients positive for 18F-FDG uptake, and a ratio of more than 2 for the highest SUVmax on 68Ga-somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET to the most 18F-FDG-avid tumor lesions, the median OS was 53.0 mo, compared with 43.4 mo in those patients with a ratio of less than 2 (P = 0.030). For patients with no 18F-FDG uptake (complete mismatch imaging pattern), the median OS was 108.3 mo versus 76.9 mo for an SUVmax of more than 15.0 and an SUVmax of 15.0 or less on 68Ga-SSTR PET/CT, respectively. Conclusion: The presence of positive lesions on 18F-FDG PET is an independent prognostic factor in patients with NENs treated with PRRT. Metabolic imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT complements the molecular imaging aspect of 68Ga-SSTR PET/CT for the prognosis of survival after PRRT. High SSTR expression combined with negative 18F-FDG PET/CT results is associated with the most favorable long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Zhang
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Qingxing Liu
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China; and
| | - Aviral Singh
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Christiane Schuchardt
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Harshad R Kulkarni
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Telo S, Calderoni L, Vichi S, Zagni F, Castellucci P, Fanti S. Alternative and New Radiopharmaceutical Agents for Lung Cancer. Curr Radiopharm 2020; 13:185-194. [PMID: 31868150 PMCID: PMC8206190 DOI: 10.2174/1874471013666191223151402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND FDG PET/CT imaging has an established role in lung cancer (LC) management. Whilst it is a sensitive technique, FDG PET/CT has a limited specificity in the differentiation between LC and benign conditions and is not capable of defining LC heterogeneity since FDG uptake varies between histotypes. OBJECTIVE To get an overview of new radiopharmaceuticals for the study of cancer biology features beyond glucose metabolism in LC. METHODS A comprehensive literature review of PubMed/Medline was performed using a combination of the following keywords: "positron emission tomography", "lung neoplasms", "non-FDG", "radiopharmaceuticals", "tracers". RESULTS Evidences suggest that proliferation markers, such as 18F-Fluorothymidine and 11CMethionine, improve LC staging and are useful in evaluating treatment response and progression free survival. 68Ga-DOTA-peptides are already routinely used in pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) management and should be firstly performed in suspected NENs. 18F-Fluoromisonidazole and other radiopharmaceuticals show a promising impact on staging, prognosis assessment and therapy response in LC patients, by visualizing hypoxia and perfusion. Radiolabeled RGD-peptides, targeting angiogenesis, may have a role in LC staging, treatment outcome and therapy. PET radiopharmaceuticals tracing a specific oncogene/signal pathway, such as EGFR or ALK, are gaining interest especially for therapeutic implications. Other PET tracers, like 68Ga-PSMA-peptides or radiolabeled FAPIs, need more development in LC, though, they are promising for therapy purposes. CONCLUSION To date, the employment of most of the described tracers is limited to the experimental field, however, research development may offer innovative opportunities to improve LC staging, characterization, stratification and response assessment in an era of increased personalized therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvi Telo
- Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Metropolitan Nuclear Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Tel/Fax: +390512143959; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Briganti V, Cuccurullo V, Berti V, Di Stasio GD, Linguanti F, Mungai F, Mansi L. 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC is a New Opportunity in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung (and in other Malignant and Benign Pulmonary Diseases). Curr Radiopharm 2020; 13:166-176. [PMID: 31886756 PMCID: PMC8193811 DOI: 10.2174/1874471013666191230143610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) consist of a relatively rare spectrum of malignancies that can arise from neuroendocrine cells; lung NETs (L-NETs) represent about 25% of primary lung neoplasm and 10% of all carcinoid tumors. Diagnostic algorithm usually takes into consideration chest Xray, contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. Nuclear medicine plays a crucial role in the detection and correct assessment of neoplastic functional status as it provides in vivo metabolic data related to the overexpression of Somatostatin Receptors (SSTRs) and also predicting response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). 111In-Pentreotide (Octreoscan®) is commercially available for imaging of neuroendocrine tumors, their metastases and the management of patients with NETs. More recently, 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC(Tektrotyd®) was introduced into the market and its use has been approved for imaging of patients with L-NETs and other SSTR-positive tumors. 99mTc-EDDA/HYNIC-TOC could also represent a good alternative to 68Ga-DOTA-peptides (DOTA-TOC, DOTA-NOC, DOTATATE) in hospitals or centers where PET/CT or 68Ge/68Ga generators are not available. When compared to 111In-Pentetreotide, Tektrotyd® showed slightly higher sensitivity, in the presence of higher imaging quality and lower radiation exposure for patients. Interesting perspectives depending on the kinetic analysis allowed by Tektrotyd® may be obtained in differential diagnosis of non-small cells lung cancer (NSCLC) versus small cells lung cancer (SCLC) and NETs. An interesting perspective could be also associated with a surgery radio-guided by Tektrotyd® in operable lung tumors, including either NETs and NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vincenzo Cuccurullo
- Address correspondence to this author at the Medicina Nucleare, Università della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, P.zza Miraglia 2, 80138 Napoli, Italy; E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kumar P, Tripathi SK, Chen CP, Wickstrom E, Thakur ML. Evaluating Ga-68 Peptide Conjugates for Targeting VPAC Receptors: Stability and Pharmacokinetics. Mol Imaging Biol 2019; 21:130-139. [PMID: 29802552 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-018-1207-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In recent years, considerable progress has been made in the use of gallium-68 labeled receptor-specific peptides for imaging oncologic diseases. The objective was to examine the stability and pharmacokinetics of [68Ga]NODAGA and DOTA-peptide conjugate targeting VPAC [combined for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP)] receptors on tumor cells. PROCEDURES A VPAC receptor-specific peptide was chosen as a model peptide and conjugated to NODAGA and DOTA via solid-phase synthesis. The conjugates were characterized by HPLC and MALDI-TOF. Following Ga-68 chelation, the radiochemical purity of Ga-68 labeled peptide conjugate was determined by radio-HPLC. The stability was tested against transmetallation using 100 nM Fe3+/Zn2+/Ca2+ ionic solution and against transchelation using 200 μM DTPA solution. The ex vivo and in vivo stability of the Ga-68 labeled peptide conjugate was tested in mouse plasma and urine. Receptor specificity was determined ex vivo by cell binding assays using human breast cancer BT474 cells. Positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) imaging, tissue distribution, and blocking studies were performed in mice bearing BT474 xenografts. RESULTS The chemical and radiochemical purity was greater than 95 % and both conjugates were stable against transchelation and transmetallation. Ex vivo stability at 60 min showed that the NODAGA-peptide-bound Ga-68 reduced to 42.1 ± 3.7 % (in plasma) and 37.4 ± 2.9 % (in urine), whereas the DOTA-peptide-bound Ga-68 was reduced to 1.2 ± 0.3 % (in plasma) and 4.2 ± 0.4 % (in urine) at 60 min. Similarly, the in vivo stability for [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide was decreased to 2.1 ± 0.2 % (in plasma) and 2.2 ± 0.4 % (in urine). For [68Ga]DOTA-peptide, it was decreased to 1.4 ± 0.3 % (in plasma) and 1.2 ± 0.4 % (in urine) at 60 min. The specific BT474 cell binding was 53.9 ± 0.8 % for [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide, 25.8 ± 1.4 % for [68Ga]-DOTA-peptide, and 18.8 ± 2.5 % for [68Ga]GaCl3 at 60 min. Inveon microPET/CT imaging at 1 h post-injection showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher tumor to muscle (T/M) ratio for [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide (3.4 ± 0.3) as compared to [68Ga]DOTA-peptide (1.8 ± 0.6). For [68Ga]GaCl3 and blocked mice, their ratios were 1.5 ± 0.6 and 1.5 ± 0.3 respectively. The tissue distributions data were similar to the PET imaging data. CONCLUSION NODAGA is superior to DOTA in terms of radiolabeling kinetics. The method of radiolabeling was reproducible and yielded higher specific activity. Although both agents have relatively low in vivo stability, PET/CT imaging studies delineated BC tumors with [68Ga]NODAGA-peptide, but not with [68Ga]DOTA-peptide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pardeep Kumar
- Departments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sushil K Tripathi
- Departments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - C P Chen
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, China
| | - Eric Wickstrom
- Departments of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mathew L Thakur
- Departments of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. .,Departments of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Locust Street, JAH Suite 359, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA. .,Departments of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Cuccurullo V, Di Stasio GD, Mansi L. Physiopathological Premises to Nuclear Medicine Imaging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours. Curr Radiopharm 2019; 12:98-106. [DOI: 10.2174/1874471012666190206094555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background:
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (P-NETs) are a challenge in terms of both
diagnosis and therapy; morphological studies need to be frequently implemented with nonstandard
techniques such as Endoscopic Ultrasounds, Dynamic CT, and functional Magnetic Resonance.
Discussion:
The role of nuclear medicine, being scarcely sensitive F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose, is mainly
based on the over-expression of Somatostatin Receptors (SSTR) on neuroendocrine tumor cells surface.
Therefore, SSTR can be used as a target for both diagnosis, using radiotracers labeled with gamma or
positron emitters, and therapy. SSTRs subtypes are capable of homo and heterodimerization in specific
combinations that alter both the response to ligand activation and receptor internalization.
Conclusion:
Although agonists usually provide efficient internalization, also somatostatin antagonists
(SS-ANTs) could be used for imaging and therapy. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT)
represents the most successful option for targeted therapy. The theranostic model based on SSTR does
not work in insulinoma, in which different radiotracers such as F-18 FluoroDOPA or tracers for the
glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor have to be preferred.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Cuccurullo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine "F.Magrassi, A.Lanzara" – Universita della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Danilo Di Stasio
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine "F.Magrassi, A.Lanzara" – Universita della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| | - Luigi Mansi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine "F.Magrassi, A.Lanzara" – Universita della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhang J, Singh A, Kulkarni HR, Schuchardt C, Müller D, Wester HJ, Maina T, Rösch F, van der Meulen NP, Müller C, Mäcke H, Baum RP. From Bench to Bedside-The Bad Berka Experience With First-in-Human Studies. Semin Nucl Med 2019; 49:422-437. [PMID: 31470935 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2019.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Precision oncology is being driven by rapid advances in novel diagnostics and therapeutic interventions, with treatments targeted to the needs of individual patients on the basis of genetic, biomarker, phenotypic, or psychosocial characteristics that distinguish a given patient from other patients with similar clinical presentations. Inherent in the theranostics paradigm is the assumption that diagnostic test results can precisely determine whether an individual is likely to benefit from a specific treatment. As part and integral in the current era of precision oncology, theranostics in the context of nuclear medicine aims to identify the appropriate molecular targets in neoplasms (diagnostic tool), so that the optimal ligands and radionuclides (therapeutic tool) with favorable labeling chemistry can be selected for personalized management of a specific disease, taking into consideration the specific patient, and subsequently monitor treatment response. Over the past two decades, the use of gallium-68 labeled peptides for somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT (or PET/MRI) imaging followed by lutetium-177 and yttrium-90 labeled SSTR-agonist for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has demonstrated remarkable success in the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms, and paved the way to other indications of theranostics. Rapid advances are being made in the development of other peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals, small molecular-weight ligands and with newer radioisotopes with more favorable kinetics, potentially useful for theranostics strategies for the clinical application. The present review features the Bad Berka experience with first-in-human studies of new radiopharmaceuticals, for example, prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand, gastrin-releasing peptide receptor, neurotensin receptor 1 ligand, novel SSTR-targeting peptides and nonpeptide, and bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals. Also new radioisotopes, for example, actinium (225Ac), copper (64Cu), scandium (44Sc), and terbium (152Tb/161Tb) will be discussed briefly demonstrating the development from basic science to precision oncology in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Zhang
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Aviral Singh
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Harshad R Kulkarni
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Christiane Schuchardt
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Hans-J Wester
- Institute for Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
| | - Theodosia Maina
- Molecular Radiopharmacy, INRASTES, NCSR "Demokritos", Athens, Greece
| | - Frank Rösch
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Nicholas P van der Meulen
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; (
- )Laboratory of Radiochemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Cristina Müller
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Helmut Mäcke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hicks RJ, Freudenberg L, Beyer T. A new model for training in hybrid imaging. Lancet Oncol 2019; 19:1152-1154. [PMID: 30191837 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30482-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney J Hicks
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3000, Australia.
| | | | - Thomas Beyer
- QIMP Team, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Background Quantification is one of the key benefits of nuclear medicine imaging. Recently, driven by the demand for post radionuclide therapy imaging, quantitative SPECT has moved from relative and semiquantitative measures to absolute quantification in terms of activity concentration, and yet further to normalised uptake using the standard uptake value (SUV). This expansion of quantitative SPECT has the potential to be a useful tool in the nuclear medicine armoury, but key factors must be addressed before it can meet its full potential. Discussion Quantitative SPECT should address an unmet clinical need and give metrics that are clinically meaningful. Using the technique in a similar manner to PET with longitudinal assessments of disease in terms of SUV is one example that meets these criteria. Having metrics that are evaluated to ensure that they are correct, that are optimised to maximise their sensitivity, and that are transferrable to allow multi-centre learning and applicability to all users of the technology are other areas of quantitative SPECT that need to be addressed and that have specific challenges associated with them. Finally, ensuring quantitative SPECT is cost-effective in times when healthcare budgets are being squeezed is also very important. Conclusion Quantitative SPECT offers the possibility to continue and expand the potential of quantitative nuclear medicine applications. The time is now to ensure that our community works together to make this potential a reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Dickson
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital, Euston Road 235, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
| | - James Ross
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital, Euston Road 235, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Stefan Vöö
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital, Euston Road 235, London, NW1 2BU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Günther T, Tulipano G, Dournaud P, Bousquet C, Csaba Z, Kreienkamp HJ, Lupp A, Korbonits M, Castaño JP, Wester HJ, Culler M, Melmed S, Schulz S. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature. Pharmacol Rev 2019; 70:763-835. [PMID: 30232095 PMCID: PMC6148080 DOI: 10.1124/pr.117.015388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST2 and SST5 receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST2 is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Günther
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Giovanni Tulipano
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Pascal Dournaud
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Corinne Bousquet
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Zsolt Csaba
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Hans-Jürgen Kreienkamp
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Amelie Lupp
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Márta Korbonits
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Justo P Castaño
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Michael Culler
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Shlomo Melmed
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| | - Stefan Schulz
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany (T.G., A.L., S.S.); Unit of Pharmacology, Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (G.T.); PROTECT, INSERM, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France (P.D., Z.C.); Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, INSERM UMR 1037-University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France (C.B.); Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany (H.-J.K.); Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom (M.K.); Maimonides Institute for Biomedical Research of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Department of Cell Biology, Physiology, and Immunology, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Reina Sofia University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); CIBER Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Córdoba, Spain (J.P.C.); Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany (H.-J.W.); Culler Consulting LLC, Hopkinton, Massachusetts (M.C.); and Pituitary Center, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (S.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours including high-grade (WHO G3) neuroendocrine tumours: response to treatment and long-term survival update. Nucl Med Commun 2018; 39:789-796. [PMID: 29912750 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Upon diagnosis, distant metastases are encountered in 21-50% of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). However, few systemic treatment options are available for the well-differentiated NETs in the metastatic stage. Lu-DOTATATE is one of the most effective treatments in this limited patient group. We retrospectively investigated its efficacy and effect on the survival in patients with both well-differentiated and grade III NETs who had high uptake in pretherapeutic Ga-DOTATATE PET/computed tomography scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic NETs treated with Lu-DOTATATE between January 2010 and November 2015 in our department were included in this retrospective cohort. Toxicity and adverse effects were evaluated according to SWOG criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated considering the first date of treatment. Response was evaluated according to RECIST criteria. Potential predictors of survival and response were analysed. RESULTS Patients (n=186) with metastatic NETs originating from various primary sites (bronchial, pancreatic, nonpancreatic gastroenteropancreatic-NETs, pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma and unknown primary) were treated with 1107 courses of Lu-DOTATATE treatment (median: 6; range: 3-12). Among 160 patients whose responses to treatment could be evaluated according to the RECIST criteria, 28.1% (n=45) had a progressive disease, 21.9% (n=35) had a stable disease, 46.9% (n=75) had a partial response and 3.1% (n=5) had a complete response. Median follow-up was 30.6 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimated median PFS was 36.4 months, mean PFS was 38 months and the mean OS was 55 months. The disease control rates in patients with WHO grades I, II and III were 74, 73 and 60%, respectively, and the OS rates were 61.9, 52.2 and 38.4 months, respectively. We observed no major renal toxicity except a minor increase (11.1%) in average serum creatinine levels. In 33.9% (n=56) of the patients, grade I toxicity; in 9.1% (n=15), grade II; and in 1.2% (n=2), grade III toxicity were observed. CONCLUSION Lu-DOTATATE therapy is an important treatment option in somatostatin receptor type-2-positive pancreatic, nonpancreatic gastroenteropancreatic-NETs, and lung NETs including metastatic NETs with an unknown primary site and significantly contributed to patients' OS. Additionally, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy may have a role in a selected subgroup of patients with grade III NET with high somatostatin receptor type-2 expression.
Collapse
|
27
|
Pencharz D, Gnanasegaran G, Navalkissoor S. Theranostics in neuroendocrine tumours: somatostatin receptor imaging and therapy. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20180108. [PMID: 30102557 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Theranostics and its principles: pre-treatment selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment by the use of a related, specific diagnostic test are integral to the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). This is due to NETs' important, but variable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression, their heterogeneity and variation in site of primary and rate of progression. Only patients whose tumours have sufficient expression of SSTRs will benefit from SSTR-based radionuclide therapy and demonstrating this expression prior to therapy is essential. This article provides a relevant overview of NETs and the multiple facets of SSTR based theranostics, including imaging and therapy radionuclides; clinical efficacy and toxicity; patient selection and treatment and finally emerging radiopharmaceuticals and newer clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Pencharz
- 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust , Brighton , UK
| | - Gopinath Gnanasegaran
- 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK
| | - Shaunak Navalkissoor
- 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhang J, Kulkarni HR, Singh A, Niepsch K, Müller D, Baum RP. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Safety and Survival Analysis in 69 Patients. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:377-385. [PMID: 30115686 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.215848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
To date, limited data are available concerning peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) with a Ki-67 proliferation index of greater than 20%. The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term outcome, efficacy, and safety of PRRT in patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-expressing G3 NENs. Methods: A total of 69 patients (41 men; age, 28-81 y) received PRRT with 177Lu- or 90Y-labeled somatostatin analogs (DOTATATE or DOTATOC). Twenty-two patients had radiosensitizing chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), defined from the start of PRRT, including a subgroup analysis for patients with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% and a Ki-67 index of greater than 55%. Treatment response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 as well as molecular imaging criteria (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). Short- and long-term toxicity was documented (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 5.0) using a structured database (comprising >250 items per patient) and retrospectively analyzed. Results: Forty-six patients had pancreatic NENs, 11 had unknown primary cancer, 6 had midgut NENs, 3 had gastric NENs, and 3 had rectal NENs. The median follow-up was 94.3 mo. The median PFS was 9.6 mo, and the median OS was 19.9 mo. For G3 NENs with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% (n = 53), the median PFS was 11 mo and the median OS was 22 mo. Patients with a Ki-67 index of greater than 55% (n = 11) had a median PFS of 4 mo and a median OS of 7 mo. For patients with positive SSTR imaging but no 18F-FDG uptake, the median PFS was 24 mo and the median OS was 42 mo. A significant difference was found for both PFS and OS, with median PFS of 16 mo and 5 mo and median OS of 27 mo and 9 mo for an SUVmax of greater than 15.0 and an SUVmax of less than or equal to 15.0, respectively, on SSTR PET. In the group with 18F-FDG uptake scored as 3 or 4, the median PFS was 7.1 mo and the median OS was 17.2 mo. In the group with 18F-FDG uptake scored as 0-2, the median PFS was 24.3 mo and the median OS was 41.6 mo. PRRT was well tolerated by all patients; no grade 3 or grade 4 hematotoxicity occurred, and no clinically significant decline in renal function was observed. There was no hepatotoxicity. Conclusion: PRRT was tolerated well, without significant adverse effects, and was efficacious in G3 NENs; the clinical outcome was promising, especially in patients with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% and even in patients for whom chemotherapy had failed. Baseline 18F-FDG along with SSTR molecular imaging was useful for stratifying G3 NEN patients with high uptake on SSTR PET/CT and no or minor 18F-FDG avidity-a mismatch pattern that was associated with a better long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Zhang
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Harshad R Kulkarni
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Aviral Singh
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Karin Niepsch
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Dirk Müller
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Precision Oncology, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kulkarni HR, Singh A, Langbein T, Schuchardt C, Mueller D, Zhang J, Lehmann C, Baum RP. Theranostics of prostate cancer: from molecular imaging to precision molecular radiotherapy targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20180308. [PMID: 29762048 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Alterations at the molecular level are a hallmark of cancer. Prostate cancer is associated with the overexpression of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in a majority of cases, predominantly in advanced tumors, increasing with the grade or Gleason's score. PSMA can be selectively targeted using radiolabeled PSMA ligands. These small molecules binding the PSMA can be radiolabeled with γ-emitters like 99mTc and 111In or positron emitters like 68Ga and 18F for diagnosis as well as with their theranostic pairs such as 177Lu (β-emitter) or 225Ac (α-emitter) for therapy. This review summarizes the theranostic role of PSMA ligands for molecular imaging and targeted molecular radiotherapy, moving towards precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harshad R Kulkarni
- 1 Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka , Bad Berka , Germany
| | - Aviral Singh
- 1 Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka , Bad Berka , Germany
| | - Thomas Langbein
- 1 Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka , Bad Berka , Germany
| | - Christiane Schuchardt
- 1 Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka , Bad Berka , Germany
| | - Dirk Mueller
- 1 Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka , Bad Berka , Germany
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- 1 Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka , Bad Berka , Germany
| | - Coline Lehmann
- 1 Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka , Bad Berka , Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- 1 Theranostics Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka , Bad Berka , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pretargeting in the context of theranostics and companion diagnostics in nuclear oncology. Clin Transl Imaging 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-018-0271-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
31
|
Baum RP, Kulkarni HR, Singh A, Kaemmerer D, Mueller D, Prasad V, Hommann M, Robiller FC, Niepsch K, Franz H, Jochems A, Lambin P, Hörsch D. Results and adverse events of personalized peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Yttrium and 177Lutetium in 1048 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Oncotarget 2018; 9:16932-16950. [PMID: 29682195 PMCID: PMC5908296 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of patients with somatostatin receptor expressing neuroendocrine neoplasms has shown promising results in clinical trials and a recently published phase III study. Methods In our center, 2294 patients were screened between 2004 and 2014 by 68Ga somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET/CT. Intention to treat analysis included 1048 patients, who received at least one cycle of 90Yttrium or 177Lutetium-based PRRT. Progression free survival was determined by 68Ga SSTR-PET/CT and EORTC response criteria. Adverse events were determined by CTCAE criteria. Results Overall survival (95% confidence interval) of all patients was 51 months (47.0-54.9) and differed significantly according to radionuclide, grading, previous therapies, primary site and functionality. Progression free survival (based on PET/CT) of all patients was 19 months (16.9-21), which was significantly influenced by radionuclide, grading, and origin of neuroendocrine neoplasm. Progression free survival after initial progression and first and second resumption of PRRT after therapy-free intervals of more than 6 months were 11 months (9.4-12.5) and 8 months (6.4-9.5), respectively. Myelodysplastic syndrome or leukemia developed in 22 patients (2.1%) and 5 patients required hemodialysis after treatment, other adverse events were rare. Conclusion PRRT is effective and overall survival is favorable in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms depending on the radionuclide used for therapy, grading and origin of the neuroendocrine neoplasm which is not exactly mirrored in progression free survival as determined by highly sensitive 68Ga somatostatin receptor PET/CT using EORTC criteria for determining response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard P Baum
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Harshad R Kulkarni
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Aviral Singh
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Daniel Kaemmerer
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Dirk Mueller
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Vikas Prasad
- Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Merten Hommann
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Franz C Robiller
- Center of Molecular Imaging, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Karin Niepsch
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| | | | - Arthur Jochems
- Department of Radiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Lambin
- Department of Radiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiation Oncology (The D-Lab), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dieter Hörsch
- Department of Gastroenterology/Endocrinology, Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors Bad Berka - ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Prospective of 68Ga Radionuclide Contribution to the Development of Imaging Agents for Infection and Inflammation. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2018. [PMID: 29531507 PMCID: PMC5817300 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9713691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
During the last decade, the utilization of 68Ga for the development of imaging agents has increased considerably with the leading position in the oncology. The imaging of infection and inflammation is lagging despite strong unmet medical needs. This review presents the potential routes for the development of 68Ga-based agents for the imaging and quantification of infection and inflammation in various diseases and connection of the diagnosis to the treatment for the individualized patient management.
Collapse
|
33
|
Yamaguchi A, Hanaoka H, Higuchi T, Tsushima Y. Radiolabeled (4-Fluoro-3-Iodobenzyl)Guanidine Improves Imaging and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Norepinephrine Transporter–Expressing Tumors. J Nucl Med 2017; 59:815-821. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.201525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
34
|
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography using 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs is the mainstay for the evaluation of receptor status in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This translates towards better therapy options, with increasing evidence of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) as the treatment of choice for advanced or progressive NETs. There are benefits in progression-free and overall survival as well as a significant improvement in clinical condition. In patients with progressive NETs, fractionated, personalized PRRT results in good therapeutic responses with no significant severe hematological and/or renal toxicity, thus improving quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sze Ting Lee
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Harshad R Kulkarni
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Aviral Singh
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abstract
This article discusses the important role of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy in the management of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy has a high impact on patient management versus conventional imaging. Molecular radiotherapy is an important part of the management of patients with NETs. Selection of patients for molecular radiotherapy in NETs is based on uptake on their radionuclide imaging study. The imaging agent has the same mechanism of uptake as the therapeutic agent. Thus, the imaging study preselects patients that are likely to concentrate radiation within their tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Glenn Flux
- Royal Marsden Hospital & Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Levine R, Krenning EP. Clinical History of the Theranostic Radionuclide Approach to Neuroendocrine Tumors and Other Types of Cancer: Historical Review Based on an Interview of Eric P. Krenning by Rachel Levine. J Nucl Med 2017; 58:3S-9S. [PMID: 28864612 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.186502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In nuclear medicine, the term theranostics describes the combination of therapy and diagnostic imaging. In practice, this concept dates back more than 50 years; however, among the most successful examples of theranostics are peptide receptor scintigraphy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors. The development of these modalities through the radiolabeling of somatostatin analogs with various radionuclides has led to a revolution in patient management and established a foundation for expansion of the theranostic principle into other oncology indications. This article provides a review of the evolution and development of the theranostic radionuclide approach to the management of neuroendocrine tumors, as described by the inventor of this technique, Eric P. Krenning, in an interview with Rachel Levine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Levine
- Corporate Communications, Advanced Accelerator Applications, S.A., New York, New York; and
| | - Eric P Krenning
- Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Directed Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Cancer J 2017; 22:347-352. [PMID: 27749329 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on both benign and malignant prostatic tissue. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-directed therapy is conceptually promising, with a potential to additionally serve as a theranostic model in management of advanced prostate cancer. To date, various approaches have been devised and tested, including radiolabeled PSMA antibodies and inhibitor and antibody-drug conjugates. However, development and progress have faced challenges in determining the optimal combination of payload, PSMA-binding moiety, and linker technology. We review the available clinical data to date in PSMA-directed therapies and discuss the challenges faced.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor PET/CT using (68)Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs, is a mainstay for the evaluation of the somatostatin receptor status in neuroendocrine neoplasms. In addition, the assessment of glucose metabolism by (18)F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis can overcome probable shortcomings of histopathologic grading. This offers a systematic theranostic approach for the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms, that is, patient selection for the appropriate treatment-surgery, somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, targeted therapies like everolimus and sunitinib, or chemotherapy-and also for therapy response monitoring. Novel targets, for example, the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in higher-grade tumors and glucagon like peptide-1 receptor in insulinomas, appear promising for imaging. Scandium-44 and Copper-64, especially on account of their longer half-life (for pretherapeutic dosimetry) and cyclotron production (which favors mass production), might be the potential alternatives to (68)Ga for PET/CT imaging. The future of molecular imaging lies in Radiomics, that is, qualitative and quantitative characterization of tumor phenotypes in correlation with tumor genomics and proteomics, for a personalized cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harshad R Kulkarni
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Aviral Singh
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany
| | - Richard P Baum
- THERANOSTICS Center for Molecular Radiotherapy and Molecular Imaging, ENETS Center of Excellence, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Theranostics labeled with Y-90 or Lu-177 are highly efficient therapeutic approaches for the systemic treatment of various cancers including neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been used for many years for metastatic or inoperable neuroendocrine tumors. However, renal and hematopoietic toxicities are the major limitations for this therapeutic approach. Kidneys have been considered as the "critical organ" because of the predominant glomerular filtration, tubular reabsorption by the proximal tubules, and interstitial retention of the tracers. Severe nephrotoxity, which has been classified as grade 4-5 based on the "Common Terminology Criteria on Adverse Events," was reported in the range from 0%-14%. There are several risk factors for renal toxicity; patient-related risk factors include older age, preexisting renal disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous nephrotoxic chemotherapy, metastatic lesions close to renal parenchyma, and single kidney. There are also treatment-related issues, such as choice of radionuclide, cumulative radiation dose to kidneys, renal radiation dose per cycle, activity administered, number of cycles, and time interval between cycles. In the literature, nephrotoxicity caused by PRRT was documented using different criteria and renal function tests, from serum creatinine level to more accurate and sophisticated methods. Generally, serum creatinine level was used as a measure of kidney function. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation based on serum creatinine was preferred by several authors. Most commonly used formulas for estimation of GFR are "Modifications of Diet in Renal Disease" (MDRD) equation and "Cockcroft-Gault" formulas. However, more precise methods than creatinine or creatinine clearance are recommended to assess renal function, such as GFR measurements using Tc-99m-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), Cr-51-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), or measurement of Tc-99m-MAG3 clearance, particularly in patients with preexisting risk factors for long-term nephrotoxicity. Proximal tubular reabsorption and interstitial retention of tracers result in excessive renal irradiation. Coinfusion of positively charged amino acids, such as l-lysine and l-arginine, is recommended to decrease the renal retention of the tracers by inhibiting the proximal tubular reabsorption. Furthermore, nephrotoxicity may be reduced by dose fractionation. Patient-specific dosimetric studies showed that renal biological effective dose of <0Gy was safe for patients without any risk factors. A renal threshold value <28Gy was recommended for patients with risk factors. Despite kidney protection, renal function impairment can occur after PRRT, especially in patients with risk factors and high single or cumulative renal absorbed dose. Therefore, patient-specific dosimetry may be helpful in minimizing the renal absorbed dose while maximizing the tumor dose. In addition, close and accurate renal function monitoring using more precise methods, rather than plasma creatinine levels, is essential to diagnose the early renal functional changes and to follow-up the renal function during the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belkis Erbas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University, Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Murat Tuncel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hacettepe University, Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Estorch M. Tratamiento con 177Lu-DOTATATE: pasado, presente y futuro. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2017; 36:69-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2017.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
41
|
Hicks RJ, Kwekkeboom DJ, Krenning E, Bodei L, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Arnold R, Borbath I, Cwikla J, Toumpanakis C, Kaltsas G, Davies P, Hörsch D, Tiensuu Janson E, Ramage J. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues. Neuroendocrinology 2017; 105:295-309. [PMID: 28402980 DOI: 10.1159/000475526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians caring for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia in considering eligibility criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and in defining the minimum requirements for PRRT. It is not these guidelines' aim to give recommendations on the use of specific radiolabelled somatostatin analogues for PRRT as different analogues are being used, and their availability is governed by varying international regulations. However, a recent randomized controlled trial, NETTER-1, has provided evidence that may establish <sup>177</sup>Lu-DOTA-octreotate (LutaThera®) as the first widely approved agent. It also makes recommendations on what minimal patient, tumour, and treatment outcome characteristics should be reported for PRRT to facilitate robust comparisons between studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney J Hicks
- Cancer Imaging and Neuroendocrine Service, the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nock BA, Kaloudi A, Nagel J, Sinnes JP, Roesch F, Maina T. Novel bifunctional DATA chelator for quick access to site-directed PET 68Ga-radiotracers: preclinical proof-of-principle with [Tyr3]octreotide. Dalton Trans 2017; 46:14584-14590. [DOI: 10.1039/c7dt01684k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Comparison of 68Ga-DATA-TOC vs. 68Ga-DOTA-TOC in sst2-positive cells and tumor-bearing mice revealed the suitability of DATA for easy access to 68Ga-labeled vectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berthold A. Nock
- Molecular Radiopharmacy
- INRASTES
- NCSR “Demokritos”
- GR-15310 Athens
- Greece
| | | | - Johannes Nagel
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry
- Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz
- D-55126 Mainz
- Germany
| | - Jean-Philippe Sinnes
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry
- Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz
- D-55126 Mainz
- Germany
| | - Frank Roesch
- Institute of Nuclear Chemistry
- Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz
- D-55126 Mainz
- Germany
| | - Theodosia Maina
- Molecular Radiopharmacy
- INRASTES
- NCSR “Demokritos”
- GR-15310 Athens
- Greece
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gould SM, Soultanidis GM, Marsden PK, Livieratos L. PVA cryogel test objects for image-based quantification and functional volume segmentation in nuclear medicine. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2016. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/2/6/067001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
44
|
Díaz del Arco C, Esteban López-Jamar JM, Ortega Medina L, Díaz Pérez JÁ, Fernández Aceñero MJ. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Correlation between Ki-67 index in cytological samples and clinical behavior. Diagn Cytopathol 2016; 45:29-35. [PMID: 27863178 DOI: 10.1002/dc.23635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2016] [Revised: 10/22/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Luis Ortega Medina
- Department of Surgical Pathology; Hospital Clínico San Carlos; Madrid Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nock BA, Kaloudi A, Lymperis E, Giarika A, Kulkarni HR, Klette I, Singh A, Krenning EP, de Jong M, Maina T, Baum RP. Theranostic Perspectives in Prostate Cancer with the Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Antagonist NeoBOMB1: Preclinical and First Clinical Results. J Nucl Med 2016; 58:75-80. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.178889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
|
46
|
Abstract
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours associated with variable clinical presentations, growth rates, and prognoses. To improve the management of GEP-NENs, the WHO developed a classification system that enables tumours to be graded based on markers of cell proliferation in biopsy specimens. Indeed, histopathology has been a mainstay in the diagnosis of GEP-NENs, and the WHO grading system facilitates therapeutic decision-making; however, considerable intratumoural heterogeneity, predominantly comprising regional variations in proliferation rates, complicates the evaluation of tumour biology. The use of molecular imaging modalities to delineate the most-aggressive cell populations is becoming more widespread. In addition, molecular profiling is increasingly undertaken in the clinical setting, and genomic studies have revealed a number of chromosomal alterations in GEP-NENs, although the 'drivers' of neoplastic development have not been identified. Thus, our molecular understanding of GEP-NENs remains insufficient to inform on patient prognosis or selection for treatments, and the WHO classification continues to form the basis for management of this disease. Nevertheless, our increasing understanding of the molecular genetics and biology of GEP-NENs has begun to expose flaws in the WHO classification. We describe the current understanding of the molecular characteristics of GEP-NENs, and discuss how advances in molecular profiling measurements, including assays of circulating mRNAs, are likely to influence the management of these tumours.
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
This article provides an overview of the key considerations for the development and application of molecular imaging agents for brain tumors and the major classes of PET tracers that have been used for imaging brain tumors in humans. The mechanisms of uptake, biological implications, primary applications, and limitations of PET tracers in neuro-oncology are reviewed. The available data indicate that several of these classes of tracers, including radiolabeled amino acids, have imaging properties superior to those of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose, and can complement contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of brain tumors.
Collapse
|
48
|
Salavati A, Puranik A, Kulkarni HR, Budiawan H, Baum RP. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) of Medullary and Nonmedullary Thyroid Cancer Using Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues. Semin Nucl Med 2016; 46:215-24. [DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2016.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
49
|
A novel, self-shielded modular radiosynthesis system for fully automated preparation of PET and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Nucl Med Commun 2016; 37:207-14. [DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
50
|
Okarvi SM, Maecke HR. Radiometallo-Labeled Peptides in Tumor Diagnosis and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy. ADVANCES IN INORGANIC CHEMISTRY 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.adioch.2015.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|