An exclusively intraabdominal distal esophageal segment prevents primary delayed anastomosis in children with pure esophageal atresia

Primary anastomosis in difficult cases of type "C" esophageal atresia: The atraumatic microvascular clamp technique of minimal tension with good outcome

BACKGROUND

Surgical maneuvers for esophageal anastomosis in difficult cases of Gross type "C" esophageal atresia (EA) are challenging. The methods of early primary anastomosis are technically difficult and staged surgeries expose the child to repeated general anesthesia with problems of nursing care. We describe a simple method of partial disconnection of the lower esophagus from the fistula followed by approximation by an atraumatic microvascular clamp. The suitability of this method and its outcomes are discussed.

METHODS

It was a prospective observational study that included 32 patients of type "C" EA between January 2014 and December 2016. Babies with birth weight more than 2 kg without cyanotic heart defects and requirement of intensive care were included. An early primary anastomosis using this technique was tried in all. A cervical esophagostomy with feeding gastrostomy was done where it was not possible. Analysis of the gap and post operative outcomes i.e. gastroesophageal reflux (GER), stricture, tracheomalacia, dysmotility, recurrence and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean gap between esophageal ends was 4.3 cm. Primary anastomosis was possible in 26 (81.25%). Minor and major leak occurred in 3 (11.54%) and 1 (3.85%) patients respectively. Survival was 84.62% (22/26). All mortalities were early post operative. During mean follow up of 23.73 months (till December 2019), GER decreased from 63.64% (14/22) to 13.64% (3/22), partial stricture was seen in 18.18% (4/22), tracheomalacia in 36.36% (8/22) and dysmotility in 77.27% (17/22). There was no recurrence of fistula. Complications with this method did not show any significant difference as mentioned with other methods.

CONCLUSION

This technique seems to be physiologically suitable as it enables anastomosis with minimal trauma to the esophageal ends. It is easy, reproducible and produces favorable outcomes comparable with other methods for difficult cases of type "C" esophageal atresia (EA).

Transhiatal isoperistaltic colon interposition without cervical oesophagostomy in long-gap oesophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal colonic interposition in oesophageal atresia (OA) patients is almost exclusively done as a staged operation with an initial oesophagostomy and gastrostomy followed by the definitive surgery months later. This study presents a series of patients in whom a cervical oesophagostomy was not performed before the substitution surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Records of EA patients were evaluated for those who underwent colon interposition without cervical oesophagostomy.

RESULTS

There were five patients: three with pure EA and two with proximal tracheo-oesophageal fistula. A delayed primary repair could not be performed because of intra-abdominally located distal pouch. The mean age at the time of definitive operation was 5.54 (±2.7) months and the mean weight was 6.24 (±1.3) kg. A right or a left colonic segment was used for interposition keeping the proximal anastomosis within the thorax. The post-operative results were quite satisfactory within a median follow-up period of 33.2 months.

CONCLUSION

Avoiding cervical oesophagostomy and its inherent complications and drawbacks is possible in a subset of patients with long-gap EA who underwent colonic substitution surgery. This approach may be seen as an extension of the consensus that the native oesophagus should be preserved whenever possible, because it uses the native oesophagus in its entirety.

Comparison of outcomes according to the operation for type A esophageal atresia

Purpose

The purpose was to evaluate outcomes according to different operative strategies of type A esophageal atresia (EA).

Methods

All patients who underwent surgery for type A EA between 1980 and 2011 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: E-E group included patients who received esophageal end-to-end anastomosis, whereas E-G group included patients who received esophago-gastric tube anastomosis.

Results

Twenty-two patients were included. The median gestational age was 37.5 weeks. The median birth weight was 2.5 kg. Twenty-one patients underwent gastrostomy as initial procedures, and one patient underwent primary esophageal end-to-end anastomosis. The median gap between both esophageal ends was six vertebral distance (VD). Seven patients underwent primary anastomosis of the esophagus, and 14 patients underwent gastric replacement. Three patients (13.6%) had anastomotic leakage and 10 patients (45.5%) had anastomotic stenosis. Most of the patients (90.9%) had gastroesophageal reflux, but only two patients required antireflux surgery. The median VD was significantly shorter in E-E group than in E-G group (3 VD vs. 6 VD). Stenosis was significantly more often in E-E group, but there was no significant difference in leakage and reflux symptoms.

Conclusion

The treatment for type A EA can include E-E anastomosis or E-G anastomosis, depending on the length of the end-to-end interval after performing gastrostomy. Appropriate tension and blood flow in the anastomosis site are essential for preventing postoperative stenosis and leakage, and esophageal replacement with gastric tube is believed to be feasible and safe in cases where excessive tension is present.

Long-gap esophageal atresia treated by growth induction: the biological potential and early follow-up results

This study had two purposes. The first was to determine whether the growth procedure would allow true primary repairs of the most severe end of the esophageal atresia (EA) spectrum with the longest gaps (LG) and most rudimentary lower esophageal segments. The second goal was to provide the first short- to mid-term (3-12 years) follow-up data on the esophageal function and quality of life (QOL) data on the patients in this series. From our series of 60 LG-EA patients who underwent a growth procedure, 42 had the true primary esophageal repair completed 3 years ago. Among these, 18 had gaps over 6 cm, and for 6, only a rudimentary lower esophagus existed well below the diaphragm. No patient was turned down and all had primary repairs. These results suggest that even the most rudimentary segment has the potential to achieve normal size and that the full EA spectrum can have a primary repair. Our follow-up studies indicated that the esophageal function of these previously grown segments was very good. All contacted (40) were eating normally with only 3 receiving supplemental g-tube feeds because of other significant defects. We have actively treated significant reflux and 41/42 had fundoplication. By endoscopy (N = 15) no esophagitis was visible, but on biopsy, mild inflammation was found in 3. No conditions were found which would suggest that there would be a late deterioration or adverse consequences would arise. Based on these ongoing evaluations, the outlook seems very favorable for a good long-term QOL.

Colonic replacement in cases of esophageal atresia

Replacement of the esophagus in children is still a challenging problem; one of the major indications is failed esophageal atresia repair or long-gap ones. The colon is one of the best alternatives for replacement; long-term follow up has shown satisfactory results. In cases of complicated repair receiving frequent dilation and multiple operations, colon could be an alternative choice for these children to achieve normal swallowing.

Total gastric transposition is better than partial gastric tube esophagoplasty for esophageal replacement in children

Whenever the surgeon uses the stomach as an esophageal substitute, either one of two techniques is generally performed: total gastric transposition or gastric tube esophagoplasty. No existing reports compare the complications associated with these two surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to review the authors' experience with total gastric transposition and verify whether this technique is superior to gastric tube esophagoplasty in children by comparing the main complications with those reported in the publications of gastric tubes esophagoplasties in the English language literature published in the last 38 years. A total of 35 children underwent total gastric transposition according to the classical technique. Most of these patients (27, or 77.1%) had long gap esophageal atresia. The most frequently observed complications were compared to those reported in nine studies of gastric tube esophagoplasty comprising 184 patients. Mortality and graft failure rates were also compared. Seven patients (20.0%) presented with leaks, all of which closed spontaneously. Six children were reoperated, three experienced gastric outlet obstruction secondary to axial torsion of the stomach placed in the retrosternal space and the other three experienced delayed gastric emptying that required revision of the piloroplasty. There were two deaths (5.7%) and no graft failure. Strictures were observed in five patients (14.2%) and all of these were resolved with endoscopic dilatations. Six patients had diarrhea that spontaneously resolved. In the late follow-up period, all patients were on full feed and thriving well. The comparisons with gastric tube patients demonstrated that the total gastric transposition group presented with significantly less leaks and strictures (P = 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively). The incidence of death and graft failure was not statistically different. In conclusion, gastric transposition is as a simple technical procedure for esophageal replacement in children with satisfactory results, and is superior to gastric tube esophagoplasty.

Long-term results of delayed primary anastomosis for pure oesophageal atresia: a 27-year follow up

The management of a newborn with pure oesophageal atresia continues to be challenging. We started treating babies with pure oesophageal atresia by delayed primary anastomosis in 1977. The purpose of this study was to review the long-term outcome in infants with pure oesophageal atresia (EA) treated by delayed primary anastomosis with special emphasis on gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) related morbidity. The medical charts of all patients treated by delayed primary anastomosis between 1977 and 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. All survivors were followed up with completion of a questionnaire and personal/phone interviews. There were 26 patients in total admitted during the 27-year study period with the diagnosis of pure oesophageal atresia. Three died prior to surgery due to associated anomalies; two had almost no distal oesophageal segment and underwent oesophageal replacement surgery. The remaining 21 children were treated with delayed primary anastomosis and made up our study group. There were four deaths (19%) in this group, and all were prior to 1980. The median gestational age was 35.5 weeks and the median birth weight was 2.6 kg; median initial gap was 3.7 cm and median preoperative gap was 1.5 cm; median age at operation was 80 days and the median hospital stay was 5.5 months. The median follow-up period was 13.5 years. Fourteen children (66%) developed symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux and nine of these needed fundoplication (43%). Sixteen children developed strictures at the anastomotic site; ten responded to repeated dilatations while six needed resection and reanastomosis. At the time of this study, 15 out of the 17 survivors (88%) were on normal diet with no respiratory problems and 2 (12%) were dependent on gastrostomy feeds. Our long-term follow-up data shows that the delayed primary anastomosis provides excellent functional results in patients born with pure oesophageal atresia. The high incidence of gastroesophageal reflux and associated morbidity requires early intervention to prevent ongoing feeding problems due to oesophagitis and stricture formation.

The management of long gap esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

Present management of esophageal atresia has enabled the survival rate to approach 95%. Controversy remains concerning the many options for the surgical management of long gap esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula and represents the difficulty of this pathology. In the last couple of years, we have had a nonexplained outbreak of cases of long gap esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula. This article reports our experience in the management of these children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

It is a retrospective study of all cases of long gap esophageal atresia without tracheoesophageal fistula managed in our institution since 1992, focusing on the antenatal period, delivery with weight and term, the associated malformations, the initial management, and the definitive surgery. Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Ten cases (8.7%) of long gap esophageal atresia according to Ladd's classification, 6 during the past 2 years, were taken in charge at Robert Debré Hospital between 1992 and 2002. There were 4 girls and 6 boys. Ten had a prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia. The average birth weight was 2496 g (range, 1400-3400 g) with an average term of 36.6-week gestation (range, 31.5-39.6). Delayed reconstruction was done in all children between 41 and 147 days of life (average of 102 days). Six had a direct anastomosis and 4 had a colonic esophagoplasty (3 with an esogastric disconnection during the same procedure). The average follow-up was 60 months (range, 27-133). There was 1 death owing to adenovirus infection at 5 years of age. Four children required a Nissen fundoplication for severe gastroesophageal reflux. At least, 2 children presented an anastomotic stricture which required pneumatic dilatations.

CONCLUSION

Treatment options for long gap esophageal atresia generally require several stages over several months. We propose, for their management, a direct anastomosis at 4 months of age whenever it is possible. If not, we use a colonic esophagoplasty with an esogastric disconnection to control the gastroesophageal reflux which is responsible for strictures and respiratory impairment and does not obstruct the aperistaltic tube.