Brief communication: use of the multitargeted antifolate pemetrexed (Alimta) in genitourinary cancer

Current chemotherapeutic options for the treatment of advanced bladder cancer: a review

Advanced bladder cancer is a disease with a high recurrence rate and metastatic capacity exhibiting a poor outcome. The pathologic stage and nodal involvement are independent prognostic factors for survival after cystectomy, and in locally advanced or metastatic disease, the performance status and the presence of visceral metastases have been correlated with treatment outcome. The regimen methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin (MVAC) has been the treatment of choice for decades and later the combination of cisplatin with gemcitabine became also the new standard of care, by demonstrating a more favorable toxicity profile. Also, carboplatin-gemcitabine and taxanes have been useful alternatives for patients unfit for cisplatin-based treatment. Additionally, the evaluation of certain chemotherapeutic agents has produced promising results in the second-line setting. Lastly, the past decade has provided information on the molecular mechanism of bladder cancer offering a personalized approach and optimizing the management of the disease.

Chemotherapy for bladder cancer: treatment guidelines for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bladder preservation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and metastatic cancer

To determine the optimal use of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting in patients with advanced urothelial cell carcinoma, a consensus conference was convened by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Société Internationale d'Urologie (SIU) to critically review the published literature on chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. This article reports the development of international guidelines for the treatment of patients with locally advanced bladder cancer with neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. Bladder preservation is also discussed, as is chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. The conference panel consisted of 10 medical oncologists and urologists from 3 continents who are experts in this field and who reviewed the English-language literature through October 2004. Relevant English-language literature was identified with the use of Medline; additional cited works not detected on the initial search regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bladder preservation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and chemotherapy for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer were reviewed. Evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management of the disease were made with reference to a 4-point scale. Results of the authors' deliberations are presented as a consensus document. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on cisplatin-containing combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy revealed a 5% difference in favor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No randomized trials have yet compared survival with transurethral resection of bladder tumor alone versus cystectomy for the management of patients with muscle-invasive disease. Collaborative international adjuvant chemotherapy trials are needed to assist researchers in assessing the true value of adjuvant chemotherapy. Systemic cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy is the only current modality that has been shown in phase 3 trials to improve survival in responsive patients with advanced urothelial cancer. A panel of international experts has formulated grade A through D recommendations for the management of patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer on the basis of level 1 to 3 evidence and the findings of phase 2 trials, prospective randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.

Chemotherapy for Metastatic or Unresectable Bladder Cancer

Cisplatin, methotrexate, doxorubicin, and vinblastine (M-VAC) combination chemotherapy has been the historic standard of care in patients with advanced urothelial tumors. Phase III trials have evaluated new combinations such as gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC), carboplatin/paclitaxel, docetaxel/cisplatin, and interferon-alpha/5-fluorouracil/cisplatin. However, these new regimens have failed to demonstrate superiority in terms of overall survival when compared with classic M-VAC. The GC doublet has proved to be a new standard treatment alternative based on an improved toxicity profile and similar survival results. The addition of a third agent (paclitaxel) to this regimen is the focus of a phase III trial. However, long-term follow-up with classical and new regimens (doublets and triplets) still show limited efficacy and emphasize the need to identify more active treatment. For "unfit" patients, ie, those unable to receive cisplatin-based regimens, conventional regimens include methotrexate, carboplatin, and vinblastine (M-CAVI), carboplatin-gemcitabine, carboplatin-paclitaxel, gemcitabine-taxane, or monotherapy with either gemcitabine, carboplatin, or a taxane. New drugs, including pemetrexed and vinflunine, are now being studied for salvage therapy. In addition to new active drug combinations and targeted therapies, chemotherapy optimization using molecular characteristics to predict chemosensitivity is emerging.

Gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium

M-VAC (cisplatin, methotrexate, adriamycin, vinblastine) combination chemotherapy has been for long time the standard of care in fit patient with advanced urothelial tumors. Gemcitabine/cisplatin with similar results and an improved toxicity profile has proved to be a new standard alternative. Whether or not we can improve survival with newer triplet regimens will depend upon the results of ongoing phase III trials. In addition to the new active drug combinations and targeted therapies, new approaches are emerging for treatment. Chemotherapy optimization using molecular markers predicting chemosensitivity are being applied. There is an obvious need to incorporate in clinical trials a systematic translational approach to explain both our successes and our failures.

Gemcitabine, paclitaxel, pemetrexed and other newer agents in urothelial and kidney cancers

Significant progress has been made in understanding the biology of urothelial and kidney cancers. Approaches to advanced urothelial cancer include dose intensification, reducing toxicity in unfit or elderly patients, doublet and triplet combination chemotherapy and sequential regimens. Promising new chemotherapeutic agents such as the epothilones, pemetrexed (Alimta), topoisomerase inhibitors and vinflunine act at different phases of the cell cycle and on folate metabolism. New agents that are combined with chemotherapy in urothelial cancer include the farnesyl transferase inhibitors and growth factors receptor inhibitors. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is particularly resistant to cytotoxic agents, although a gemcitabine/fluorinated pyrimidine combination may have modest but real clinical benefit. In metastatic RCC, new biologic and targeted therapies include anti-angiogenesis agents such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody and thalidomide, as well as toremifene, CCI-779 and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Metastatic urothelial and renal cell cancers continue to be the clinical trial focus of many novel agents. The molecular biology of these diseases is being unravelled and as knowledge accumulates, our ability to target these cancers will continue to increase.