The role of pulmonary metastasectomy in soft tissue sarcoma

Lung Metastases: Current Surgical Indications and New Perspectives

Pulmonary metastasectomy is an established treatment that can provide improved long- term survival for patients with metastatic tumor(s) in the lung. In this mini-review, we discuss the state of the art of thoracic surgery in surgical management of lung metastases which actually occurs for a large part of surgical activity in thoracic surgery department. We describe the principles of surgical therapy that have been defined across the time, and that should remain the milestones of lung metastases treatment: a radical surgery and an adequate lymphadenectomy. We then focus on current surgical indications and report the oncological results according to the surgical approach (open vs. mini-invasive), the histological type and number of lung metastases, and in case of re-metastasectomy. Finally, we conclude with a brief overview about the future perspectives in thoracic surgery in treatment of lung metastases.

Volume Doubling Times of Pulmonary Metastases in Patients With Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Associations With Subsequent New Metastases and Survival After Metastasectomy

Background: Pulmonary metastases of bone and soft tissue sarcoma are common and have a high recurrence rate after metastatectomy. Factors associated with post-metastatectomy recurrence are not well studied. Objective: To investigate the association of the volume doubling time (VDT) of pulmonary metastases with the subsequent development of new pulmonary nodules and survival after metastasectomy in patients with bone or soft tissue sarcoma. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with bone or soft tissue sarcoma who, between July 2020 and December 2020, underwent first complete metastasectomy of pulmonary nodules visualized on two sequential preoperative CT scans. Semi-automatic volumetric segmentation of the pulmonary metastases was performed on the two CT scans, and VDTs were calculated. VDT was compared between patients with and without subsequent new metastases after metastatectomy. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) after metastasectomy and for post-metastasectomy overall survival (OS). Results: Forty patients (21 women, 19 men; mean age, 51.1±14.3 years) were included. Of these patients, 23 (57.5%) developed new metastatic nodules after metastasectomy, and 10 (25%) died during follow-up. Median VDT was shorter in patients with, versus without, new metastases after metastasectomy (56 vs. 140 days, p=.002). Only four of 23 patients with new metastases had VDT ≥140 days. In multivariable analysis, older age [hazard ratio (HR), 1.06; p=.004), female sex (HR, 2.80; p=.03), and VDT <140 days (hazard ratio [HR], 4.22; p=.01) were independent predictors of worse RFS. Also in multivariable analysis, only older age (HR, 1.17; p=.005) and VDT <50 days (HR, 8.60; p=.02) were independent predictors of worse OS. OS was significantly worse in patients with VDT <140 days (10 deaths among 27 patients) than in patients with VDT ≥140 days (no deaths in 13 patients) (p=.01). Conclusions: In patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma, shorter VDT of pulmonary metastases is independently associated with subsequent new metastases after metastasectomy and worse OS. Clinical Impact: VDT of pulmonary nodules may be considered in patient selection for pulmonary metastasectomy and in postoperative patient management.

Prognostic influence of the treatment approach for pulmonary metastasis in patients with soft tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare heterogeneous malignancies of mesenchymal origin. Pulmonary metastases develop in approximately 50% of the patients with high-grade STS, being the major cause of mortality in patients with metastatic STS. Pulmonary metastasectomy has been reported to contribute to long-term survival; however, an appropriate treatment has not been established. We aimed to identify factors associated with post-metastasis survival in STS patients with pulmonary metastasis and determine the appropriate treatment for each patient. We retrospectively reviewed the records of metastatic STS patients treated between 2000 and 2017 and analyzed the clinico-pathologic variables to identify factors associated with the survival. The median survival after pulmonary metastasis was 20.6 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 68.6%, 36.0%, and 25.1%, respectively. The survival was significantly greater in patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy than in those without surgery (38.9 months vs. 10.5 months; p < 0.0001). Among those who did not undergo surgery, the survival was significantly greater in patients who received chemotherapy than in those without chemotherapy (19.1 months vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.037). Multivariate analysis identified pulmonary metastasectomy as the most important prognostic factor for post-metastasis survival (Hazard ratio 5.623; 95% Confidence Interval 2.733-11.572; p < 0.0001). In conclusion, pulmonary metastasectomy was the most important prognostic factor for post-metastasis survival in patients with metastatic STS. In addition, chemotherapy could prolong survival in patients who were not eligible for pulmonary resection. Although we should carefully weigh the risks and benefits, appropriate treatment for pulmonary metastases could contribute to long-time survival.

Secondary surgical resection for patients with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma

OBJECTIVES

To assess outcomes after secondary surgical resection in patients with recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS).

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all patients who had no evidence of disease after initial surgery for uLMS, who underwent surgery for a first recurrence at our institution between 1/1991 and 10/2013. We excluded patients who received any therapy for recurrence prior to secondary resection, and patients who underwent surgery soon after morcellation [of presumed benign fibroids] showed widespread disease. Overall survival (OS) was determined from time of first recurrence to death or last follow-up.

RESULTS

We identified 62 patients: 29 with abdominal/pelvic recurrence only, 30 with lung recurrence only, 3 with both. Median time to first recurrence was 18 months (95% CI: 13.3-23.3): 15.8 months (95% CI: 13.0-18.6) abdominal/pelvic recurrence; 24.1 months (95% CI: 14.5-33.7) lung-only recurrence (p = 0.03). Median OS was 37.7 months (95% CI: 25.9-49.6) abdominal/pelvic recurrence; 78.1 months (95% CI: 44.8-11.4) lung recurrence (p = 0.02). Complete gross resection (CGR) was achieved in 58 cases (93%), with gross residual ≤1 cm in 2 (3.5%) and >1 cm in 2 (3.5%). Median OS based on residual disease was 54.1 months (95% CI: 24.9-83.3), 38.7 months (95% CI: NE), 1.7 months (95% CI: NE), respectively (p < 0.001). In cases with CGR, neither adjuvant radiation (N = 9), chemotherapy (N = 8) nor hormonal therapy (N = 10) was associated with improved OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary surgical resection of recurrent uLMS is reasonable in patients with a high probability of achieving CGR. Lung-only recurrences were associated with more favorable outcome. Following CGR, additional therapy may not offer benefit.

Pulmonary metastasectomy: a cross sectional survey

Background

No prospective randomised studies or international guidelines exist for conduct of pulmonary metastasectomy. The aim of this study was to generate general recommendations for the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy through a cross sectional survey of thoracic surgeons.

Methods

A panel of international experts who participated in a consensus statement formation on video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy were approached to participate in the survey. The Delphi methodology consisting of two rounds of voting was used to establish recommendations. Clinical practice was deemed 'recommended' if 50-74% of the experts reached agreement and 'highly recommended' if 75% or more of the experts reached agreement following the second round of voting.

Results

Twenty-two experts from 8 countries completed both rounds of standardised questionnaires. Recommendations were reached on all of the 18 questions concerning the role, indications, contraindications, preoperative evaluation, operative strategy, follow-up and alternative treatment strategies for pulmonary metastasectomy.

Conclusions

The results of this survey represent a collective agreement among international thoracic surgery experts and establishes general recommendations for the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy.

Management of Sarcoma Metastases to the Lung

For decades, surgical resection of pulmonary metastases has been performed; despite limited randomized data, surgery is increasingly accepted as an integral part in the management of metastatic disease. Long-term results indicate resection is potentially curative with significantly improved survival following complete resection. Recurrence, however, is not uncommon with many patients undergoing repeat resection. With advancing surgical technique and adjuvant therapies, patients with high or recurrent tumor burden are increasingly afforded disease control and potential cure. In this review, the prognostic characteristics of pulmonary metastases from sarcoma, preoperative evaluation, operative technique, long-term outcomes, and management of complex patients are highlighted.

Soft Tissue and Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is one of the most common subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma in adults and can occur in almost any part of the body. Uterine leiomyosarcoma is the most common subtype of uterine sarcoma. Increased awareness of this unique histology has allowed for the development of drugs that are specific to LMS and has begun to shed light on the similarities and possible unique aspects of soft tissue and uterine LMS. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the epidemiology, diagnosis, genomics, and treatment options for LMS.

Surgical management of lung metastases

Management of pulmonary metastases has evolved considerably over the last few decades but is still controversial. The surgical management of lung metastases is outlined, discussing the preoperative management, indications for surgery, the surgical approach and outcomes according to the primary histology.

Metastatic mesenteric dedifferentiated leiomyosarcoma: a case report and a review of literature

Background

Abdominal leiomyosarcoma arising from the mesentery is a rare malignancy. It is an aggressive entity with an overall 5 year survival rate between 20 and 30 %. Surgical resection is the cornerstone of primary treatment and may be curative for localized disease. However, patients often develop intra-abdominal relapse and/or metastatic disease. If surgical resection is not feasible, palliative chemotherapy is the treatment of choice. However, there are no clear guidelines regarding chemotherapy; neither in the adjuvant nor advanced setting.

Case presentation

We present a 40 year-old woman, with a mesenteric leiomyosarcoma, who underwent radical tumor resection and did not receive adjuvant oncological therapy. Three months postoperatively, she developed metastatic disease to the lungs and liver. After multidisciplinary assessment she received an unconventional histological-subtype-tailored chemotherapy comprising 3–4 regimens. Initially, there was a decrease both in number and size of metastases. Ultimately, an almost complete radiological response was seen. Subsequent surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation of residual metastatic foci in the liver and lung brought her into complete clinical remission. She is presently tumor free, 36 months following diagnosis of metastatic disease.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient with metastatic mesenteric leiomyosarcoma who is in complete clinical and radiological long-term remission following very aggressive multimodal treatment; including intense poly-drug chemotherapy and without any demonstrable long-term side effects. Given the rarity of mesenteric leiomyosarcoma and lack of guidelines regarding oncological therapy, we suggest that multimodal therapy including aggressive chemotherapy, guided by a multidisciplinary team, is essential to achieve an optimal outcome.

Thoracoscopic Management of Pulmonary Metastases

In appropriately selected patients, resection of pulmonary metastases from various primary tumors can lead to improved survival. Metastasectomy has traditionally been performed by open thoracotomy; however, thoracoscopic resection offers the important benefits of a less invasive approach with more expeditious recovery. Concerns regarding missed lesions during thoracoscopy have not been realized in analyses of survival and may be offset by a policy of repeat metastasectomy for pulmonary recurrences. Despite the relative paucity of prospective trials, the preponderance of data supports the use of video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary metastasectomy, which represents our preferred strategy for these patients.

Management of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities

Soft tissue sarcomas are a diverse and rare group of neoplasms often found in the extremities. Treatment is best carried out in regional cancer centers by a multidisciplinary group with a common interest in these disorders. Treatment is usually surgical, with radiation used in select cases to try to reduce the risk of local recurrence. The role of chemotherapy is controversial, but it may be useful in patients at highest risk of developing metastatic disease. The development of newer forms of targeted systemic therapy and techniques to reduce the morbidity from local treatment to the extremity are areas of intense research interest.

Symptom burden, survival and palliative care in advanced soft tissue sarcoma

Introduction. The symptom burden and role of palliative care (PC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are not well defined. Methods. This study retrospectively reviewed both symptoms and PC involvement in patients known to an STS referral centre who died in one calendar year. Results. 81 patients met inclusion criteria of which 27% had locally advanced disease and 73% metastases at initial referral. The median number of symptoms was slowly progressive ranging from 2 (range 0-5) before first-line chemotherapy (n = 50) to 3 (range 1-6) at the time of best supportive care (BSC) decision (n = 48). Pain and dyspnoea were the commonest symptoms. Median overall survival from BSC decision was 3.4 weeks. 88% had PC involvement (either hospital, community, or both) with median time from first PC referral to death of 16 (range 0-110) weeks. Conclusions. Patients with metastatic STS have a significant symptom burden which justifies early PC referral. Pain, including neuropathic pain, is a significant problem. Dyspnoea is common, progressive and appears to be undertreated. Time from BSC decision to death is short, and prospective studies are required to determine whether this is due to overtreatment or very rapid terminal disease progression.

Primary adult soft tissue sarcomas: analysis of 294 patients

We retrospectively analyzed 294 patients with primary soft tissue sarcoma followed between 1996 and 2002 in Ankara Oncology Hospital. There were 170 male and 124 female patients with the age range of 16-80 years. The primary tumor was in the extremity in 72.9% of the patients. We determined lung metastasis in 102 (85%) out of the 120 patients as distant metastasis. The most common adult sarcomas were liposarcoma (16.3%), malignant mesenchymal tumor (MMT) (13.9%), malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) (11.2%), rhabdomyosarcoma (10.2%) and synovial sarcoma (10.2%). Seventeen patients (5.3%) had grade 1 tumor, 143 patients (52.2%) had grade 2 tumor, and 112 patients (41.4%) had grade 3 tumor. In 45 patients (15.3%), the grade of the tumors is unknown. The tumor size was 0 to <5 cm in 54 cases (19.4%), 5-10 cm in 117 cases (41.9%) and >10 cm in 108 cases (38.7%). In 15 cases (5.1%), tumor size was unknown. Ninety-five patients (32.4%) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, and 125 patients (42.7%)) were treated with palliative chemotherapy. Prognostic factors influencing the overall survival were tumor size, grade, adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy had influence on disease-free survival. While tumor grade and size showed a significant value for predicting local recurrence, grade, localization of tumor, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy had an impact on metastasis development. The 1-year overall survival for all patients was 73.4%, 3-year overall survival was 51.8%, and 5-year overall survival was 45.1%.

Early outcomes of soft tissue sarcomas presenting with metastases and treated with chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to describe outcomes for patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated with chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 383 soft tissue sarcoma patients treated at our institution from 1997 to 2006. Thirty-five patients met the inclusion criteria-metastatic disease on presentation; primary tumor outside the abdomen; treatment with chemotherapy; and minimum follow-up of 3 months. Treatments were individualized and determined by a multidisciplinary oncology team. Patient survival was calculated from the diagnostic biopsy to the date of death or last follow-up using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Mean age was 47 years (range 17-74 years). Most common tumors involved were MFH and leiomyosarcoma. Sixteen of 35 (46%) patients had died at last follow-up. Mean patient survival was 24 months (range 4-102). The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 64% and 24%, respectively. Twenty-nine patients (83%) presented with pulmonary metastasis, 6 with bone metastases (17%), 4 with regional node metastases (11%), and 4 with soft tissue metastases (11%). Survival was the same for those with pulmonary and only extrapulmonary metastases. The 10 patients with complete resection or complete chemotherapy response of all detectable lesions had longer mean survival (34 months) than the 25 patients who had partial/no resection or response (20 months) (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Soft tissue sarcoma patients presenting with metastatic disease have a low survival rate, but complete eradication of tumor correlated with longer survival. Longer-term studies especially those tracking the outcome of complete responders and those completely resected will help determine the efficacy of chemotherapy.

Multidisciplinary management of metastatic sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of malignancies of mesenchymal origin. Although sarcomas can arise virtually anywhere, the most common primary site is the extremity. The development of metastatic disease poses a major clinical problem because it is seldom amenable to a curative treatment. However, with careful and expert multidisciplinary team selection of patients with metastatic sarcoma-balancing probability of benefit with certain toxicity-a combined multimodality approach may provide hope to a select few for prolonged survival and even cure.

Diagnosis and management of lipomatous tumors

Lipomatous tumors range from benign lipomas to high-grade liposarcomas. Liposarcomas are classified into five histologic subtypes: well-differentiated, dedifferentiated, myxoid, round cell, and pleomorphic, which differ in outcomes and patterns of recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of curative treatment; however, large, high grade liposarcomas may benefit from multimodality treatment with chemotherapy and radiation. A histologic-subtype specific nomogram provides accurate survival predictions. Prospective randomized clinical trials will continue to improve our care of patients with liposarcoma.

Sarcoma

Sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal neoplasms. They can be grouped into 2 general categories, soft tissue sarcoma and primary bone sarcoma, which have different staging and treatment approaches. This review includes a discussion of both soft tissue sarcomas (malignant fibrous histiocytoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, angiosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, aggressive fibromatosis or desmoid tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, and primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma) and primary bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, giant cell tumor, and chondrosarcoma). The 3 most important prognostic variables are grade, size, and location of the primary tumor. The approach to a patient with a sarcoma begins with a biopsy that obtains adequate tissue for diagnosis without interfering with subsequent optimal definitive surgery. Subsequent treatment depends on the specific type of sarcoma. Because sarcomas are relatively uncommon yet comprise a wide variety of different entities, evaluation by oncology teams who have expertise in the field is recommended. Treatment and follow-up guidelines have been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (www.nccn.org).

Microwave ablation: principles and applications

Microwave ablation is the most recent development in the field of tumor ablation. The technique allows for flexible approaches to treatment, including percutaneous, laparoscopic, and open surgical access. With imaging guidance, the tumor is localized, and a thin (14.5-gauge) microwave antenna is placed directly into the tumor. A microwave generator emits an electromagnetic wave through the exposed, noninsulated portion of the antenna. Electromagnetic microwaves agitate water molecules in the surrounding tissue, producing friction and heat, thus inducing cellular death via coagulation necrosis. The main advantages of microwave technology, when compared with existing thermoablative technologies, include consistently higher intratumoral temperatures, larger tumor ablation volumes, faster ablation times, and an improved convection profile. Microwave ablation has promising potential in the treatment of primary and secondary liver disease, primary and secondary lung malignancies, renal and adrenal tumors, and bone metastases. The technology is still in its infancy, and future developments and clinical implementation will help improve the care of patients with cancer.

Adult soft tissue sarcomas: Conventional therapies and molecularly targeted approaches

The therapeutic approach to soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has evolved over the past two decades based on the results from randomized controlled trials, which are guiding physicians in the treatment decision-making process. Despite significant improvements in the control of local disease, a significant number of patients ultimately die of recurrent/metastatic disease following radical surgery due to a lack of effective adjuvant treatments. In addition, the characteristic chemoresistance of STS has compromised the therapeutic value of conventional antineoplastic agents in cases of unresectable advanced/metastatic disease. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to improve the prognosis of patients with STS. Recent advances in STS biology are paving the way to the development of molecularly targeted therapeutic strategies, the efficacy of which relies not only on the knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer development/progression but also on the personalization of the therapeutic regimen according to the molecular features of individual tumours. In this work, we review the state-of-the-art of conventional treatments for STS and summarize the most promising findings in the development of molecularly targeted therapeutic approaches.

Soft tissue sarcoma: Advances in understanding and management

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare group of neoplasms readily dispersed throughout the body with different histopathologies and different outcomes. The present review summarizes advances made in biology, distribution and natural history, and emphasises predictive models for outcome. Complete resection remains the major factor in providing cure, with limited benefits in the control of the local disease by radiation therapy and only minimal benefit of systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Identification of targeted therapy utilising direct specific molecular targets raises hope that future progress in control, if not cure, is realistic.

Primary multidisciplinary management of extremity soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies that most commonly present as large painless masses deep in the muscular compartments of the extremities. Investigation and treatment of these patients must be undertaken at a tertiary referral unit. Staging studies must include a high-quality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the local site and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest to investigate for possible metastatic disease. Review of biopsy material must be undertaken by an experienced musculoskeletal pathologist. Currently, histologic diagnosis and grade are assigned to the tumor, but in tumors such as synovial sarcoma and Ewing's family of tumors, molecular evaluation is becoming crucial for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic reasons. Surgical resection of sarcomas with negative surgical margins remains the mainstay of treatment. Surgical treatment alone is indicated for small superficial masses that are not adjacent to bone or neurovascular structures. However, in large deep masses where surgical margins are likely to be close in order to preserve important neurovascular structures and bone, combined treatment using surgical resection and radiation results in acceptable local control rates and reasonable patient function. It is incumbent on the management team to decide on timing of radiotherapy as a practice. This decision is based on several factors but potential complications must be taken into account. In this regard the long-term effects on normal tissues must be considered. Functional outcome has become an essential consideration when recommending treatment. If promising techniques become available to reduce the incidence of wound complications or to decrease the dose of radiation to normal tissue, preoperative radiation should be considered in light of its lower incidence of long-term effects that result in reduction in patient function.

Cost-effectiveness of pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy in the management of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a combined analysis from the University of Texas M. D. Anderson and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centers

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of different treatment strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

We constructed a decision tree to model the outcomes of 4 treatment strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma: pulmonary resection, systemic chemotherapy, pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy, and no treatment. Data from 1124 patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma were used to estimate disease-specific survival for pulmonary resection and no treatment. Outcomes of systemic chemotherapy and pulmonary resection and of systemic chemotherapy were estimated by assuming a 12-month improvement in disease-specific survival with chemotherapy; this was done on the basis of the widely held but unproven assumption that chemotherapy provides a survival benefit in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Direct costs were examined for a series of patients who underwent protocol-based pulmonary resection or doxorubicin/ifosfamide-based chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The mean cost of pulmonary resection was 20,339 dollars per patient; the mean cost of 6 cycles of chemotherapy was 99,033 dollars. Compared with no treatment and assuming a 12-month survival advantage with chemotherapy, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 14,357 dollars per life-year gained for pulmonary resection, 104,210 dollars per life-year gained for systemic chemotherapy, and 51,159 dollars per life-year gained for pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy. Compared with pulmonary resection, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of pulmonary resection and systemic chemotherapy was 108,036 dollars per life-year gained. Sensitivity analyses showed that certain patient and tumor features, as well as the assumed benefit of chemotherapy, affected cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with pulmonary metastases from soft tissue sarcoma who were surgical candidates, pulmonary resection was the most cost-effective treatment strategy evaluated. Even with favorable assumptions regarding its clinical benefit, systemic chemotherapy alone, compared with no treatment, was not a cost-effective treatment strategy for these patients.

Amputation for soft-tissue sarcoma

Soft-tissue sarcomas are a group of rare malignant tumours, many of which arise in the limbs. Most are treated with a combination of wide local excision and radiotherapy, but a small number--including proximal, large, high-grade, or recurrent tumours, or those involving major neurovascular structures--necessitate major amputation including forequarter or hindquarter amputation. These uncommon operations should remain in the surgical armamentarium for carefully selected patients. Those being considered for amputation should be referred to a tertiary sarcoma unit for examination of all other options, such as limb-salvage surgery, tumour downstaging with chemotherapy or radiotherapy (perhaps with subsequent limb-salvage surgery), or novel techniques such as isolated limb perfusion. Only after careful assessment should amputation be carried out. Outcomes after major amputation are highly variable, but such procedures can confer useful palliation to patients with distressing symptoms (pain, bleeding, fungation), long-term disease-free survival with reasonable function in carefully selected patients, and cure in some.

Major amputation for soft-tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Advances in oncological practice have reduced the number of major amputations performed for soft-tissue sarcoma, but this remains a valuable, if infrequent, option for both curative and palliative indications.

METHODS

A review of patients and case-notes was carried out from the prospective sarcoma database at the Royal Marsden Hospital.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year interval, 40 major amputations (18 forequarter, 17 hindquarter and five through hip) were performed, predominantly for disease recurring after previous limb-conserving surgery (31 of 40). A wide variety of soft-tissue sarcoma subtypes was seen; they were often large (more than 10 cm; 18 of 40) or multifocal (six), usually high grade (25), and frequently proximal or involving neurovascular structures such that limb salvage was precluded. Median range age of the patients was 59 (17-87) years. The operative 30-day mortality rate was zero. Hospital stay was a median of 10.5 days for forequarter amputation, and 19 days for hindquarter and through-hip amputation. Local recurrence occurred in ten patients, six of whom had concurrent distant metastases. Twenty-seven patients were alive (20 disease free) at a median follow-up of 12 months, nine of whom were alive without evidence of disease beyond 2 years. Ten patients died after a median of 7.5 months; three survived more than 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Major amputation is a useful procedure in carefully selected patients with soft-tissue sarcoma.