1
|
Kurihara K, Saito T, Hamada T, Nakai Y, Fujishiro M. Balloon traction for lumen-apposing metal stent placement for walled-off necrosis: balloon adventure in WONderland. Endoscopy 2024; 56:E458-E459. [PMID: 38838722 PMCID: PMC11152907 DOI: 10.1055/a-2325-2070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Kurihara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakai Y, Saito T, Hamada T, Sato T, Hakuta R, Takahara N, Isayama H, Yasuda I, Fujishiro M. Controversies in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided management of walled-off necrosis. Dig Endosc 2024. [PMID: 38895801 DOI: 10.1111/den.14869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
Walled-off necrosis (WON) develops as local complications after acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Although less invasive interventions such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy are selected over surgical interventions, delayed and step-up interventions are still preferred to avoid procedure-related adverse events. However, there is a controversy about the appropriate timing of drainage and subsequent necrosectomy. The advent of large-caliber lumen-apposing metal stents has also brought about potential advantages of proactive interventions, which still needs investigation in future trials. When step-up interventions of necrosectomy and additional drainage are necessary, a structured or protocoled approach for WON has been reported to improve safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and/or percutaneous treatment, but has not been standardized yet. Finally, long-term outcomes such as recurrence of WON, pancreatic endocrine, and exocrine function are increasingly investigated in association with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. In this review we discuss current evidence and controversy on EUS-guided management of WON.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, The Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryunosuke Hakuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naminatsu Takahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hollemans RA, Timmerhuis HC, Besselink MG, Bouwense SAW, Bruno M, van Duijvendijk P, van Geenen EJ, Hadithi M, Hofker S, Van-Hooft JE, Kager LM, Manusama ER, Poley JW, Quispel R, Römkens T, van der Schelling GP, Schwartz MP, Spanier BWM, Stommel M, Tan A, Venneman NG, Vleggaar F, van Wanrooij RLJ, Bollen TL, Voermans RP, Verdonk RC, van Santvoort HC. Long-term follow-up study of necrotising pancreatitis: interventions, complications and quality of life. Gut 2024; 73:787-796. [PMID: 38267201 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the long-term consequences of necrotising pancreatitis, including complications, the need for interventions and the quality of life. DESIGN Long-term follow-up of a prospective multicentre cohort of 373 necrotising pancreatitis patients (2005-2008) was performed. Patients were prospectively evaluated and received questionnaires. Readmissions (ie, for recurrent or chronic pancreatitis), interventions, pancreatic insufficiency and quality of life were compared between initial treatment groups: conservative, endoscopic/percutaneous drainage alone and necrosectomy. Associations of patient and disease characteristics during index admission with outcomes during follow-up were assessed. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 13.5 years (range 12-15.5 years), 97/373 patients (26%) were readmitted for recurrent pancreatitis. Endoscopic or percutaneous drainage was performed in 47/373 patients (13%), of whom 21/47 patients (45%) were initially treated conservatively. Pancreatic necrosectomy or pancreatic surgery was performed in 31/373 patients (8%), without differences between treatment groups. Endocrine insufficiency (126/373 patients; 34%) and exocrine insufficiency (90/373 patients; 38%), developed less often following conservative treatment (p<0.001 and p=0.016, respectively). Quality of life scores did not differ between groups. Pancreatic gland necrosis >50% during initial admission was associated with percutaneous/endoscopic drainage (OR 4.3 (95% CI 1.5 to 12.2)), pancreatic surgery (OR 3.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 9.5) and development of endocrine insufficiency (OR13.1 (95% CI 5.3 to 32.0) and exocrine insufficiency (OR6.1 (95% CI 2.4 to 15.5) during follow-up. CONCLUSION Acute necrotising pancreatitis carries a substantial disease burden during long-term follow-up in terms of recurrent disease, the necessity for interventions and development of pancreatic insufficiency, even when treated conservatively during the index admission. Extensive (>50%) pancreatic parenchymal necrosis seems to be an important predictor of interventions and complications during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robbert A Hollemans
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital Location, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
| | | | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefan A W Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marco Bruno
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Erwin-Jan van Geenen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Muhammed Hadithi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sybrand Hofker
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E Van-Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth M Kager
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Netherlands
| | - Eric R Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Tessa Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, Den Bosch, Netherlands
| | | | - Matthijs P Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Netherlands
| | - Bernhard W M Spanier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | | | - Adriaan Tan
- Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Niels G Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Frank Vleggaar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas L Bollen
- Department of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital Location, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Rogier P Voermans
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Robert C Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital Location, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital Location, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Veldhuisen CL, Sissingh NJ, Boxhoorn L, van Dijk SM, van Grinsven J, Verdonk RC, Boermeester MA, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Cappendijk VC, van Duijvendijk P, van Eijck CHJ, Fockens P, van Goor H, Hadithi M, Haveman JW, Jacobs MA, Jansen JM, Kop MP, Manusama ER, Mieog JSD, Molenaar IQ, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Poen AC, Poley JW, Quispel R, Römkens TE, Schwartz MP, Seerden TC, Dijkgraaf MG, Stommel MW, Straathof JWA, Venneman NG, Voermans RP, van Hooft JE, van Santvoort HC, Besselink MG. Long-Term Outcome of Immediate Versus Postponed Intervention in Patients With Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis (POINTER): Multicenter Randomized Trial. Ann Surg 2024; 279:671-678. [PMID: 37450701 PMCID: PMC10922655 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the long-term outcomes of immediate drainage versus the postponed-drainage approach in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. BACKGROUND In the randomized POINTER trial, patients assigned to the postponed-drainage approach using antibiotic treatment required fewer interventions, as compared with immediate drainage, and over a third were treated without any intervention. METHODS Clinical data of those patients alive after the initial 6-month follow-up were re-evaluated. The primary outcome was a composite of death and major complications. RESULTS Out of 104 patients, 88 were re-evaluated with a median follow-up of 51 months. After the initial 6-month follow-up, the primary outcome occurred in 7 of 47 patients (15%) in the immediate-drainage group and 7 of 41 patients (17%) in the postponed-drainage group (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.33-2.28; P =0.78). Additional drainage procedures were performed in 7 patients (15%) versus 3 patients (7%) (RR 2.03; 95% CI 0.56-7.37; P =0.34). The median number of additional interventions was 0 (IQR 0-0) in both groups ( P =0.028). In the total follow-up, the median number of interventions was higher in the immediate-drainage group than in the postponed-drainage group (4 vs. 1, P =0.001). Eventually, 14 of 15 patients (93%) in the postponed-drainage group who were successfully treated in the initial 6-month follow-up with antibiotics and without any intervention remained without intervention. At the end of follow-up, pancreatic function and quality of life were similar. CONCLUSIONS Also, during long-term follow-up, a postponed-drainage approach using antibiotics in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis results in fewer interventions as compared with immediate drainage and should therefore be the preferred approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN33682933.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte L. Van Veldhuisen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Noor J. Sissingh
- Department of Research and Development, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte Boxhoorn
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sven M. van Dijk
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke van Grinsven
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C. Verdonk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marja A. Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan A.W. Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marco J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Paul Fockens
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Muhammed Hadithi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten A.J.M. Jacobs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen M. Jansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix P.M. Kop
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eric R. Manusama
- Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - J. Sven D. Mieog
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexander C. Poen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E.H. Römkens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs P. Schwartz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Tom C. Seerden
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel G.W. Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn W.J. Stommel
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem A. Straathof
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Niels G. Venneman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier P. Voermans
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E. van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hjalmar C. van Santvoort
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marc G. Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rayman S, Jacoby H, Guenoun K, Oliphant U, Nelson D, Kaiser A, Sucandy I. Diagnosis and Contemporary Management of Necrotizing Pancreatitis. Am Surg 2023; 89:4817-4825. [PMID: 36940369 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231156781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute pancreatitis is a common diagnosis which requires a prompt diagnosis and management by a multidisciplinary team with often general surgeons as the initial provider. Morbidity and mortality from an acute pancreatitis can be very high, especially in patients with a progressive worsening acute pancreatitis developing into pancreatic necrosis in the setting of multiple underlying medical comorbidities. PURPOSE In this review paper, we discuss all aspects of acute pancreatitis and its potential complications, as well providing updates in the modern management of necrotizing pancreatitis. Practicing general surgeons need to be aware of the evolution in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. RESEARCH DESIGN We conducted a review of literature of evidence and management options for acute pancreatitis, including all published manuscripts from 2012 to 2022. RESULTS Diagnosis and management of this disease can vary among specialiaties. The decision to utilize a percutaneous or endoscopic techniques are relevant points of discussion within general surgery and gastroenterology societies. In the past decade, the use of advanced endoscopic interventions has slowly replaced conventional open surgery in managing complications of acute severe pancreatitis. CONCLUSION Acute pancreatitis is a disease which requires multidisciplinary approach with evolving treatment options to less invasive nonsurgical methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shlomi Rayman
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Harel Jacoby
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kawtar Guenoun
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Uretz Oliphant
- Department of Surgery, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USA
| | - Daniel Nelson
- Department of Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Andreas Kaiser
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nakai Y, Hamada T, Saito T, Shiomi H, Maruta A, Iwashita T, Iwata K, Takenaka M, Masuda A, Matsubara S, Sato T, Mukai T, Yasuda I, Isayama H. Time to think prime times for treatment of necrotizing pancreatitis: Pendulum conundrum. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:700-710. [PMID: 37209365 DOI: 10.1111/den.14598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) typically develop as local complications of acute pancreatitis and complicate the clinical course of patients with acute pancreatitis and potentially fatal clinical outcomes. Interventions are required in cases of symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) (matured PFCs with necrosis) and pancreatic pseudocysts (matured PFCs without necrosis). In the management of necrotizing pancreatitis and WON, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage combined with on-demand endoscopic necrosectomy (i.e. the step-up approach) is increasingly used as a less invasive treatment modality compared with a surgical or percutaneous approach. Through the substantial research efforts and development of specific devices and stents (e.g. lumen-apposing metal stents), endoscopic techniques of PFC management have been standardized to some extent. However, there has been no consensus about timing of carrying out each treatment step; for instance, it is uncertain when direct endoscopic necrosectomy should be initiated and finished and when a plastic or metal stent should be removed following clinical treatment success. Despite emerging evidence for the effectiveness of noninterventional supportive treatment (e.g. antibiotics, nutritional support, irrigation of the cavity), there has been only limited data on the timing of starting and stopping the treatment. Large studies are required to optimize the timing of those treatment options and improve clinical outcomes of patients with PFCs. In this review, we summarize the current available evidence on the indications and timing of interventional and supportive treatment modalities for this patient population and discussed clinical unmet needs that should be addressed in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousuke Nakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Endoscopy and Endoscopic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomotaka Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Shiomi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Akinori Maruta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Keisuke Iwata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu Municipal Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Mamoru Takenaka
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Atsuhiro Masuda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Saburo Matsubara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review provides insight into the recent advancements in the management of acute pancreatitis. RECENT FINDINGS Moderate fluid resuscitation and Ringer's lactate has advantages above aggressive fluid resuscitation and normal saline, respectively. A normal "on-demand" diet has a positive effect on recovery from acute pancreatitis and length of hospital stay. A multimodal pain management approach including epidural analgesia might reduce unwarranted effects of opiate use. A more targeted use of antibiotics is starting to emerge. Markers such as procalcitonin may be used to limit unwarranted antibiotic use. Conversely, many patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis can be treated with only antibiotics, although the optimal choice and duration is unclear. Delay of drainage as much as is possible is advised since it is associated with less procedures. If drainage is required, clinicians have an expanding arsenal of interventional options to their disposal such as the lumen-apposing metal stent for transgastric drainage and (repeated) necrosectomy. Immunomodulation using removal of systemic cytokines or anti-inflammatory drugs is an attractive idea, but up to now the results of clinical trials are disappointing. No additional preventive measures beside non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be recommended for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. SUMMARY More treatment modalities that are less invasive became available and a trend towards less aggressive treatments (fluids, starvation, interventions, opiates) of acute pancreatitis is again emerging. Despite recent advancements, the pathophysiology of specific subgroup phenotypes is still poorly understood which reflects the disappointing results of pharmacological and immunomodulatory trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fons F. van den Berg
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Medical Microbiology & Infection prevention
| | - Marja A. Boermeester
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9
- Amsterdam institute for Infection and Immunity
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ebrahim M, Werge MP, Hadi A, Lahchich M, Nagras ZG, Lauritsen ML, Schmidt PN, Hansen EF, Novovic S, Karstensen JG. Clinical outcomes following endoscopic or video-assisted retroperitoneal management of acute pancreatitis with large (>15 cm) walled-off pancreatic necrosis: Retrospective, single tertiary center cohort study. Dig Endosc 2022; 34:1245-1252. [PMID: 35258123 DOI: 10.1111/den.14295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Acute pancreatitis with walled-off necrosis (WON) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have evaluated outcomes in WON collections of limited size, while data about large WON with long-term follow-up are lacking. We aimed to report our experience in managing large WON. METHODS Between 2010 and 2020, consecutive patients with large (>15 cm) WON were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with chronic pancreatitis or an index intervention 90 days or more from the debut of symptoms were excluded. We registered clinical and technical outcomes following minimally invasive treatment in WON >15 cm. Follow-up was a minimum of 1 year. RESULTS Overall, 144 patients with WON >15 cm, with a median age of 60 (interquartile range [IQR] 49-69) years, were included. The median WON size was 19.2 cm (IQR 16.8-22.1). Most patients were treated with endoscopic transluminal drainage (93%). The median length of stay was 53 days (IQR 39-76) and 61 (42%) patients needed intensive care support during their hospital stay. As 143 patients (99%) were managed using endoscopic or video-assisted retroperitoneal techniques, only one (0.7%) patient needed an open necrosectomy. Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 10 (7%) patients. Overall, 24 patients (17%) died during admission, all due to multiorgan failure. The median follow-up was 35 months (IQR 15-63.5). Complete resolution was achieved in all remaining patients. CONCLUSION Minimally invasive treatment of large WON is feasible, with a minimal need for surgery and acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Ebrahim
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Parsberg Werge
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Amer Hadi
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Mariam Lahchich
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Zainab Gassem Nagras
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Morten Laksáfoss Lauritsen
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Palle Nordblad Schmidt
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Erik Feldager Hansen
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Srdan Novovic
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Gásdal Karstensen
- Pancreatitis Centre East, Gastrounit, Copenhagen University Hospital-Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chua TY, Kyanam Kabir Baig KR, Leung FW, Ashat M, Jamidar PA, Mulki R, Singh A, Yu JX, Lightdale JR. GIE Editorial Board top 10 topics: advances in GI endoscopy in 2020. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94:441-451. [PMID: 34147512 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Editorial Board reviewed a systematic literature search of original endoscopy-related articles published during 2020 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and 10 other high-impact medical and gastroenterology journals. Votes from each individual board member were tallied to identify a consensus list of the 10 most significant topic areas in GI endoscopy over the calendar year of study using 4 criteria: significance, novelty, impact on national health, and impact on global health. The 10 areas identified were as follows: artificial intelligence in endoscopy, coronavirus disease 2019 and GI practice, third-space endoscopy, lumen-apposing metal stents, single-use duodenoscopes and other disposable equipment, endosonographic needle technology and techniques, endoscopic closure devices, advances in GI bleeding management, improvements in polypectomy techniques, and bariatric endoscopy. Each board member contributed a summary of important articles relevant to 1 to 2 topic areas, leading to a collective summary that is presented in this document of the "top 10" endoscopic advances of 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Y Chua
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Harbor-University of California Los Angeles, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Kondal R Kyanam Kabir Baig
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Felix W Leung
- VA Sepulveda Ambulatory Care Center, North Hills, California, USA
| | - Munish Ashat
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Priya A Jamidar
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ramzi Mulki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Ajaypal Singh
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jessica X Yu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jenifer R Lightdale
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rerknimitr R. Whether clean or dirty, endoscopic treatment is recommended for symptomatic walled-off necrosis. Endoscopy 2021; 53:145-146. [PMID: 33503664 DOI: 10.1055/a-1223-2341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rungsun Rerknimitr
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand.,Center of Excellence for Innovation and Endoscopy in Gastrointestinal Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|