25 Jahre Erfahrung mit dem Anastomosenstoma

Reversal Surgery for Split Stoma with Peristomal Incision is Associated with Improved Postoperative Outcome in Patients with Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

Temporary stoma formation is common in Crohn's disease (CD), while stoma reversal is associated with postoperative morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of split stoma reversal, SSR (i.e., exteriorization of proximal and distal ends of the stoma through a small common opening) and end stoma closure, ESC (i.e., the proximal stump externalized, and distal end localized abdominally.

METHODS

Patients with CD who underwent stoma reversal surgeries between January 2017 and December 2021 were included. Demographic, clinical, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed to evaluate outcomes of reversal surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients who underwent stoma reversal surgeries met the inclusion criteria. SSR was superior to ESC in terms of operative time (80.0 vs. 120.0, p = 0.0004), intraoperative blood loss volume (20.0 vs. 100.0, p = 0.0002), incision length (3.0 vs. 15.0, p < 0.0001), surgical wound classification (0 vs. 8.3%, p = 0.04), postoperative hospital stay (7.0 vs. 9.0, p = 0.0007), hospital expense (45.6 vs. 54.2, p = 0.0003), and postoperative complications (23.8% vs. 44.3%, p = 0.0040). Although patients in the ESC group experienced more surgical recurrence than those in the SSR group (8.3% vs. 3.2%) during the follow-up, the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed no statistical difference (p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

The split stoma can be recommended when stoma construction is indicated in patients with Crohn's disease.

Split stoma with delayed anastomosis may be preferred for 2-stage surgical resection in high-risk patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Fecal diversion after bowel resection is a safe and effective procedure in high-risk patients with Crohn's disease, but the better approach between primary anastomosis with protective stoma and split stoma with delayed anastomosis has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of these approaches in high-risk patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

A retrospective investigation on consecutive high-risk patients with Crohn's disease was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital from August 2009 to March 2019. The primary outcomes were the overall early postoperative complications and overall anastomosis-related adverse events in an intention-to-treat approach.

RESULTS

A total of 118 consecutive patients who underwent 121 surgeries (35 procedures with a protective stoma and 86 procedures with a split stoma) were enrolled. After a median follow-up period of 659 days and 728 days, respectively, 25 patients underwent a stoma-reversal procedure in the protective-stoma group, and 54 patients underwent delayed anastomosis in the split stoma group. Overall, early 30-day surgical morbidity and anastomosis-related adverse events were observed in more patients in the protective-stoma group than in the split-stoma group (51.4% [18/35] vs 30.2% [26/86]; P = .028 and 37.1% [13/35] vs 2.3% [2/86]; P < .001, respectively; intention-to-treat analysis). Similar results were found in the per-protocol analysis (44.0% [11/25] vs 20.4% [11/54]; P = .029 and 36.0% [12/25] vs 3.7% [2/54]; P < .001, respectively.) CONCLUSION: Split stoma with delayed anastomosis is associated with a reduction in anastomotic adverse events and overall early surgical complications and thus may be a better surgical option for high-risk patients with Crohn's disease.

Split stoma in resectional surgery of high-risk patients with ileocolonic Crohn's disease

AIM

The aim of this retrospective study of ileocolonic resection in patients with Crohn's disease was to compare the outcome of primary anastomosis with that of split stoma and delayed anastomosis in a high-risk setting.

METHOD

From 1995 to 2006, 132 patients had 146 operations for ileocolonic Crohn's disease. Preoperative data, including risk factors for complications, were obtained from a prospectively registered database. Operations on patients who had two or more preoperative risk factors (n = 76) were considered to be high-risk operations and formed the main study. Primary outcome variables were postoperative anastomotic complications and the alteration in the number of preoperative risk factors achieved by a delayed anastomosis. Secondary outcome was time in hospital and the number of operations performed.

RESULTS

Early anastomotic complications were diagnosed in 19% (11/57) of patients receiving a primary anastomosis compared with 0% (0/19) of patients after a delayed anastomosis (P = 0.038). The mean number of risk factors in the split stoma group was 3.5 at the time of resection and 0.2 when the split stoma was reversed (P < 0.0001). The total number of operations was 1.9 ± 1.5 (mean ± SD) after a primary anastomosis and 2.0 ± 0.2 after a split stoma (P = 0.70). Total in-hospital time for all operations was 20.9 ± 35.6 days after a primary anastomosis and 17.8 ± 10.4 days after a delayed anastomosis (P = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

Delayed anastomosis after ileocolonic resection in high-risk Crohn's disease patients was associated with a reduction in the number of preoperative risk factors and fewer anastomotic complications. Hospital stay and number of operations were similar after delayed and primary anastomosis in high-risk patients.