Effects of tolazamide and exogenous insulin on insulin action in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Lead Optimization Resources in Drug Discovery for Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes, defined as a chronic metabolic syndrome, exhibits global prevalence and phenomenal rise worldwide. The rising incidence accounts for a global health crisis, demonstrating a profound effect on low and middle-income countries, particularly people with limited healthcare facilities.

METHODS

Highlighting the prevalence of diabetes and its socio-economic implications on the population across the globe, the article aimed to address the emerging significance of computational biology in drug designing and development, pertaining to identification and validation of lead molecules for diabetes treatment.

RESULTS

The drug discovery programs have shifted the focus on in silico prediction strategies minimizing prolonged clinical trials and expenses. Despite technological advances and effective drug therapies, the fight against life-threatening, disabling disease has witnessed multiple challenges. The lead optimization resources in computational biology have transformed the research on the identification and optimization of anti-diabetic lead molecules in drug discovery studies. The QSAR approaches and ADMET/Toxicity parameters provide significant evaluation of prospective "drug-like" molecules from natural sources.

CONCLUSION

The science of computational biology has facilitated the drug discovery and development studies and the available data may be utilized in a rational construction of a drug 'blueprint' for a particular individual based on the genetic organization. The identification of natural products possessing bioactive properties as well as their scientific validation is an emerging prospective approach in antidiabetic drug discovery.

Glucose-lowering drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease: a narrative review on pharmacokinetic properties

The achievement of a good glycaemic control is one of the cornerstones for preventing and delaying progression of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with both diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). As for other drugs, the presence of an impaired renal function may significantly affect pharmacokinetics of the majority of glucose-lowering agents, thus exposing diabetic CKD patients to a higher risk of side effects, mainly hypoglycaemic episodes. As a consequence, a reduction in dosing and/or frequency of administration is necessary to keep a satisfactory efficacy/safety profile. In this review, we aim to summarize the pharmacology of the most widely used glucose-lowering agents, discuss whether and how it is altered by a reduced renal function, and the recommendations that can be made for their use in patients with different degrees of CKD.

Oral insulin: the rationale for this approach and current developments

Insulin remains the most effective and durable hypoglycemic agent for the treatment of diabetes. The addition of an effective oral insulin dosage form to the antidiabetes armamentarium may have significant benefits in terms of fostering compliance and adherence among patients, as well as physiologic advantages due to the fact that such a dosage form replicates the natural route of insulin secretion and absorption through the portal vein and targets the liver directly. Several companies have developed technological platforms that protect polypeptides and proteins from enzymatic hydrolysis, enable their transport across the epithelial lining, and promote their absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. A review of the potential physiological rationale and advantages, as well as of current pertinent technologies used specifically with insulin, is herewith provided.

Comparison of gliclazide with insulin as initial treatment modality in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

AIM

This study was designed to compare effectiveness and remission rate between gliclazide and insulin as initial treatment in newly diagnosed, drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Newly diagnosed, drug-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes having mean fasting blood glucose >200 mg/dL were enrolled into either of two groups (gliclazide or insulin). The former received gliclazide modified-release 60 mg daily, while the insulin group received 16 units of premixed insulin as two divided doses along with medical nutrition therapy. Premeal blood glucose was monitored, and the dose was adjusted accordingly. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, and postmeal C-peptide were estimated at baseline and 6 months. Remission was defined as euglycemia off drug for a minimum duration of 1 month.

RESULTS

Baseline and 6-month blood glucose, HbA1c, and lipid profile were comparable between groups. Blood glucose levels normalized in 2-6 weeks in both groups. At 6 months, one of 30 (3.33%) in the gliclazide group and 24 of 30 (80%) in the insulin group were in remission. Ten of 16 (62.5%) in the insulin group and one of 20 (.5%) in the gliclazide group continued to maintain euglycemia off all pharmacological treatment at 12 months. At 6 months, C-peptide increased in the insulin group (3.21+/-1.61 ng/mL at baseline vs. 5.82+/-2.23 ng/mL at 6 months), while it remained unchanged in the gliclazide group (3.4+/-1.87 ng/mL at baseline vs. 3.82+/-1.78 ng/mL at 6 months) (P=0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable glycemic control could be achieved with both insulin and oral hypoglycemic agent in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes subjects. Insulin treatment exceeded gliclazide in the remission (drug-free) rate.

Effect of early insulin therapy on nuclear factor kappaB and cytokine gene expressions in the liver and skeletal muscle of high-fat diet, streptozotocin-treated diabetic rats

To clarify the effect of early insulin therapy on nuclear factor kappaB (NFkappaB) pathway and inflammatory cytokine responses in the liver and skeletal muscle in type 2 diabetes. High-fat diet and low dose streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic rats were given NPH insulin or gliclazide for 3 weeks initiated at the 3rd day after STZ injection as early treatment and NPH for 3 weeks at 1 month as late treatment. Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) was performed at 3rd day after the end of treatment. Early interventions caused a decrease in glucose-insulin index in IPGTT, promoted glucose transporter 4 (Glut4) gene and protein expressions in muscle and reduced phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) protein levels in the liver. There was an increase in inhibitor kappaB (IkappaBalpha) protein and a decrease in NFkappaB p65 DNA binding activity. A decreased level in mRNAs encoding tumor necrosis factor (TNF)alpha in the liver and muscle and interleukin (IL)-1beta in the liver were observed. Our results suggested that early insulin treatment inhibits NFkappaB activity and inflammatory cytokine responses in the liver and skeletal muscle that were involved in the amelioration of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic rats.

Comparison of the effects of pioglitazone and metformin on hepatic and extra-hepatic insulin action in people with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine mechanisms by which pioglitazone and metformin effect hepatic and extra-hepatic insulin action.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty-one subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to pioglitazone (45 mg) or metformin (2,000 mg) for 4 months.

RESULTS

Glucose was clamped before and after therapy at approximately 5 mmol/l, insulin raised to approximately 180 pmol/l, C-peptide suppressed with somatostatin, glucagon replaced at approximately 75 pg/ml, and glycerol maintained at approximately 200 mmol/l to ensure comparable and equal portal concentrations on all occasions. Insulin-induced stimulation of glucose disappearance did not differ before and after treatment with either pioglitazone (23 +/- 3 vs. 24 +/- 2 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or metformin (22 +/- 2 vs. 24 +/- 3 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)). In contrast, pioglitazone enhanced (P < 0.01) insulin-induced suppression of both glucose production (6.0 +/- 1.0 vs. 0.2 +/- 1.6 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and gluconeogenesis (n = 11; 4.5 +/- 0.9 vs. 0.8 +/- 1.2 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Metformin did not alter either suppression of glucose production (5.8 +/- 1.0 vs. 5.0 +/- 0.8 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)) or gluconeogenesis (n = 9; 3.7 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.7 micromol x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Insulin-induced suppression of free fatty acids was greater (P < 0.05) after treatment with pioglitazone (0.14 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.06 +/- 0.01 mmol/l) but unchanged with metformin (0.12 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.15 +/- 0.07 mmol/l).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, relative to metformin, pioglitazone improves hepatic insulin action in people with type 2 diabetes, partly by enhancing insulin-induced suppression of gluconeogenesis. On the other hand, both drugs have comparable effects on insulin-induced stimulation of glucose uptake.

Effects of insulin therapy on liver fat content and hepatic insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes

We determined whether insulin therapy changes liver fat content (LFAT) or hepatic insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. Fourteen patients with type 2 diabetes (age 51+/-2 yr, body mass index 33.1+/-1.4 kg/m2) treated with metformin alone received additional basal insulin for 7 mo. Liver fat (proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy), fat distribution (MRI), fat-free and fat mass, and whole body and hepatic insulin sensitivity (6-h euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp combined with infusion of [3-(3)H]glucose) were measured. The insulin dose averaged 75+/-10 IU/day (0.69+/-0.08 IU/kg, range 24-132 IU/day). Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (Hb A1c) decreased from 8.9+/-0.3 to 7.4+/-0.2% (P<0.001). Whole body insulin sensitivity increased from 2.21+/-0.38 to 3.08+/-0.40 mg/kg fat-free mass (FFM).min (P<0.05). This improvement could be attributed to enhanced suppression of hepatic glucose production (HGP) by insulin (HGP 1.04+/-0.28 vs. 0.21+/-0.19 mg/kg FFM.min, P<0.01). The percent suppression of HGP by insulin increased from 72+/-8 to 105+/-11% (P<0.01). LFAT decreased from 17+/-3 to 14+/-3% (P<0.05). The change in LFAT was significantly correlated with that in hepatic insulin sensitivity (r=0.56, P<0.05). Body weight increased by 3.0+/-1.1 kg (P<0.05). Of this, 83% was due to an increase in fat-free mass (P<0.01). Fat distribution and serum adiponectin concentrations remained unchanged while serum free fatty acids decreased significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

insulin therapy improves hepatic insulin sensitivity and slightly but significantly reduces liver fat content, independent of serum adiponectin.

Effects of Multiple Daily Insulin Injections on Peripheral Glucose Disposal in Latin Americans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of insulin in multiple daily injections (MDI) on peripheral glucose disposal in Latin American patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten Latin American patients (four men and six women) with type 2 diabetes between the ages of 32 and 45 years were evaluated. All women were premenopausal and had regular menstrual periods. A hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp procedure was performed at baseline and was repeated approximately 2 years after insulin monotherapy on MDI was initiated. Both genders had comparable baseline anthropometric and laboratory features, including a mean body mass index > 30 kg/m2 and percent body fat > 30%. Baseline percent hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c%) was 9.5 +/- 1.5%, and post-intervention HbA1c% was 7.0 +/- 1.2%. The peripheral glucose disposal rate at baseline was 4.5 +/- 2.2 mg/kg/min fat-free mass and at postintervention was 3.6 +/- 2.3 mg/kg/min fat-free mass.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a significant improvement in glycemic control, MDI did not seem to increase the insulin-mediated glucose disposal rate. Underlying obesity and increased percent body fat may have been the most counteracting factors on the potential improvement in insulin sensitivity expected with insulin monotherapy.

Diet/Exercise versus pioglitazone: effects of insulin sensitization with decreasing or increasing fat mass on adipokines and inflammatory markers

BACKGROUND

Plasma adipokine concentrations are variably related to fatness/insulin resistance and may act via endocrine mechanisms. We assessed the relationship among plasma adipokine concentrations and their relationship with insulin sensitivity and body composition in obese adults before and after insulin sensitization accomplished using diet/exercise or pioglitazone.

METHODS

Plasma adipokine concentrations, insulin sensitivity, and body composition were assessed in 39 upper-body obese insulin-resistant, nondiabetic adults before and after 19 wk of diet/exercise or 30 mg/d pioglitazone.

RESULTS

Diet/exercise reduced body fat and visceral fat and improved insulin sensitivity parameters; pioglitazone improved insulin sensitivity to a similar degree but increased body fat. Adiponectin increased more after pioglitazone (4770 +/- 487 vs. 8351 +/- 693.6 ng/ml, P < 0.001) than after diet/exercise (4704 +/- 367 to 5426 +/- 325.3 ng/ml, P < 0.01), whereas TNFalpha, IL-6, and resistin did not change. C-reactive protein decreased with diet/exercise. Adipokine concentrations were not correlated with each other at baseline or after insulin sensitization, except TNFalpha and IL-6 (r = 0.43, P < 0.05); IL-6 was inversely correlated with resistin. Only adiponectin was correlated (P < 0.05) with indices of insulin sensitivity. Adiponectin concentrations were inversely correlated with visceral fat and with sc fat depots in men but positively correlated with sc fat in women.

CONCLUSION

Plasma adipokine concentrations were not consistently interrelated, and only adiponectin displayed the expected relationship with insulin sensitivity and sensitization. These findings do not support an endocrine role for resistin, TNFalpha, and IL-6 in mediating changes in insulin resistance after diet/exercise or pioglitazone.

Mechanisms for abnormal postprandial glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes

To assess mechanisms for postprandial hyperglycemia, we used a triple-isotope technique ([\3-(3)H]glucose and [(14)C]bicarbonate and oral [6,6-dideutero]glucose iv) and indirect calorimetry to compare components of glucose release and pathways for glucose disposal in 26 subjects with type 2 diabetes and 15 age-, weight-, and sex-matched normal volunteers after a standard meal. The results were as follows: 1) diabetic subjects had greater postprandial glucose release (P<0.001) because of both increased endogenous and meal-glucose release; 2) the greater endogenous glucose release (P<0.001) was due to increased gluconeogenesis (P<0.001) and glycogenolysis (P=0.01); 3) overall tissue glucose uptake, glycolysis, and storage were comparable in both groups (P>0.3); 4) glucose clearance (P<0.001) and oxidation (P=0.004) were reduced, whereas nonoxidative glycolysis was increased (P=0.04); and 5) net splanchnic glucose storage was reduced by approximately 45% (P=0.008) because of increased glycogen cycling (P=0.03). Thus in type 2 diabetes, postprandial hyperglycemia is primarily due to increased glucose release; hyperglycemia overcomes the effects of impaired insulin secretion and sensitivity on glucose transport, but intracellular defects persist so that pathways of glucose metabolism are abnormal and glucose is shunted away from normal sites of storage (e.g., liver and muscle) into other tissues.

Pioglitazone increases non-esterified fatty acid clearance in upper body obesity

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Plasma NEFA concentrations are largely determined by adipose tissue lipolysis. Insulin suppression of lipolysis is commonly impaired with insulin resistance and improves with thiazolidinedione treatment of type 2 diabetes. The present studies were designed to assess the effects of thiazolidinedione on NEFA (oleate) metabolism that are independent of improved glycaemic control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured plasma oleate concentration and flux ([(3)H]oleate), glucose kinetics ([6-(2)H(2)]glucose) and substrate oxidation (indirect calorimetry) before and after pioglitazone (30 mg/day for approximately 20 weeks) in 20 non-diabetic adults with upper body obesity. To assess the effects of improved insulin sensitivity per se we performed the same measurements in a matched group of volunteers treated with diet/exercise. Half of the two groups underwent these measurements during a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, and the other half had their measurements taken during a (control) saline infusion before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

Both interventions increased insulin-stimulated glucose disposal and reduced plasma oleate concentrations during the insulin clamp. After diet/exercise, oleate flux decreased (p=0.03) during the insulin clamp and oleate clearance remained unchanged (p=0.55), whereas in the pioglitazone group, oleate flux during the clamp was unchanged (p=0.97) and oleate clearance increased (p=0.003). Oleate clearance in the saline control condition was increased in the pioglitazone group compared with the diet/exercise group (p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

In insulin-resistant, non-diabetic adults, pioglitazone increases NEFA clearance during physiological hyperinsulinaemia, whereas improved insulin sensitivity achieved by diet/exercise does not alter NEFA clearance but enhances insulin suppression of NEFA release. This action of pioglitazone may contribute to improved glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes.

Combination therapy using metformin or thiazolidinediones and insulin in the treatment of diabetes mellitus

The biguanide, metformin, sensitizes the liver to the effect of insulin, suppressing hepatic glucose output. Thiazolidinediones such as rosiglitazone and pioglitazone enhance insulin-mediated glucose disposal, leading to reduced plasma insulin concentrations. These classes of drugs may also have varying beneficial effects on features of insulin resistance such as lipid levels, blood pressure and body weight. Metformin in combination with insulin has been shown to significantly improve blood glucose levels while lowering total daily insulin dose and body weight. The thiazolidinediones in combination with insulin have also been effective in lowering blood glucose levels and total daily insulin dose. Triple combination therapy using insulin, metformin and a thiazolidinedione improves glycaemic control to a greater degree than dual therapy using insulin and metformin or insulin and a thiazolidinedione. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of metformin or thiazolidinediones in type 1 diabetic patients. Although these agents are largely well tolerated, some subjects experience significant gastrointestinal problems while using metformin. Metformin is associated with a low risk of lactic acidosis, but should not be used in patients with elevated serum creatinine or those being treated for congestive heart failure. The thiazolidinediones are associated with an increase in body weight, although this can be avoided with careful lifestyle management. Thiazolidinediones may also lead to oedema and are associated with a low incidence of hepatocellular injury. Thiazolidinediones are contraindicated in patients with underlying heart disease who are at risk of congestive heart failure and in patients who have abnormal hepatic function. The desired blood glucose-lowering effect and adverse event profiles of these agents should be considered when recommending these agents to diabetic patients. The potential for metformin or the thiazolidinediones to impact long-term cardiovascular outcomes remains under investigation.

Obesity and type 2 diabetes impair insulin-induced suppression of glycogenolysis as well as gluconeogenesis

To determine whether the hepatic insulin resistance of obesity and type 2 diabetes is due to impaired insulin-induced suppression of glycogenolysis as well as gluconeogenesis, 10 lean nondiabetic, 10 obese nondiabetic, and 11 obese type 2 diabetic subjects were studied after an overnight fast and during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis were measured using the deuterated water method. Before the clamp, when glucose and insulin concentrations differed among the three groups, gluconeogenesis was higher in the diabetic than in the obese nondiabetic subjects (P < 0.05) and glycogenolysis was higher in the diabetic than in the lean nondiabetic subjects (P < 0.05). During the clamp, when glucose and insulin concentrations were matched and glucagon concentrations were suppressed, both glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis were higher (P < 0.01) in the diabetic versus the obese and lean nondiabetic subjects. Furthermore, glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis were higher (P < 0.01) in the obese than in the lean nondiabetic subjects. Plasma free fatty acid concentrations correlated (P < 0.001) with glucose production and gluconeogenesis both before and during the clamp and with glycogenolysis during the clamp (P < 0.01). We concluded that defects in the regulation of glycogenolysis as well as gluconeogenesis cause hepatic insulin resistance in obese nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic humans.

Prevalence of insulin resistance in first degree relatives of type-2 diabetes mellitus patients: A prospective study in north Indian population

A total of 172 first degree relatives (FDRs) and 178 controls were included in this study. All the cases and controls were subjected to various anthropometric measurements, fasting and postprandial glucose estimation, fasting insulin measurement and fasting lipid profile. Results revealed the prevalence of Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) (cases 37% Vs controls 11.6%), Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) (cases 34.3% Vs controls 11.2%) and diabetes (cases 11.05% controls 3.37%) was significantly higher in first degree relatives. Insulin resistance was measured using various methods, which included fasting plasma insulin (FPI), Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance (HOMA(IR)), insulin sensitivity index (ISI) (Mffm/l). Prevalence of insulin resistance (Insulin Resistance) as observed comparing FPI and HOMA(IR) in cases and controls was 43.6% and 11.24% (P=0.005) and 37.8% and 12.47% (P=0.000) respectively. Prevalence of IR (Insulin Resistance) observed in cases having Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT), Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG), Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) and diabetes mellitus measuring FPI Vs HOMA(IR) was 37.5% vs 30.2%, 45% vs 40%, 38.98% vs 37.28% and 36.84% vs 31.57% as accordingly. However, ISI (Mffm/l) was not found to be a promising index for IR due to its poor specificity. Though HOMA is taken as gold standard for measurement of IR globally, our study observed fasting plasma insulin representing high sensitivity (89.7%) and specificity (93.3%) as compared to HOMA. Thus FPI had emerged in this work as a simple and reliable test for diagnosing insulin resistance across the population susceptible to develop diabetes including FDRs.

Effect of adding a sulfonylurea in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus previously well controlled with insulin

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether insulin-requiring patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and good glycemic control would benefit in weight control, serum lipid concentrations, or blood pressure from a reduction in exogenous insulin treatment.

METHODS

Eighteen patients with well-controlled NIDDM who required insulin therapy were entered into a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study of the addition for 12 weeks of treatment with a second-generation sulfonylurea agent (micronized glyburide).

RESULTS

The mean fasting plasma glucose at entry was 7.00 +/- 0.22 mmol/L and at the end of the 12-week treatment phase was 7.67 +/- 0.39 mmol/L with placebo and 7.28 +/- 0.44 mmol/L with active drug. Hemoglobin A(1c) was unchanged during the study (7.5 +/- 0.2% at entry, 7.5 +/- 0.3% with placebo, and 7.4 +/- 0.3% with active drug). Addition of the orally administered agent resulted in a 29% decrease in exogenous insulin requirements and a 37% increase in 24-hour urinary C-peptide excretion. Patients had no change in weight after 12 weeks of either placebo or active drug. Plasma cholesterol levels declined slightly during the study, but they did not differ significantly during drug and placebo treatment. Blood pressure was unchanged in both the subjects with and without hypertension.

CONCLUSION

In patients with NIDDM and good glycemic control with insulin treatment, a glyburide-related increase in endogenous insulin secretion caused a proportionate decrease in exogenous insulin requirements. With continued good glycemic control, however, the orally administered agent showed no additional benefit on weight, blood pressure, plasma triglycerides, or low-density lipoprotein or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Insulin monotherapy versus combinations of insulin with oral hypoglycaemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether patients with type 2 diabetes who have poor glycaemic control despite maximal oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) should be commenced on insulin as monotherapy, or insulin combined with oral hypoglycaemic agents (insulin-OHA combination therapy).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of insulin monotherapy versus insulin-OHA combinations therapy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Date of last search: May 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 2 months minimum follow-up duration comparing insulin monotherapy (all schemes) with insulin-OHA combination therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and assessment of study quality were undertaken by three reviewers in pairs.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty RCTs (mean trial duration 10 months) including 1,811 participants, with mean age 59.8 years and mean known duration of diabetes 9.6 years. Overall, study methodological quality was low. Twenty-eight comparisons in 20 RCTs were ordered according to clinical considerations. No studies assessed diabetes-related morbidity, mortality or total mortality. From 13 studies (21 comparisons), sufficient data were extracted to calculate pooled effects on glycaemic control. Insulin-OHA combination therapy had statistically significant benefits on glycaemic control over insulin monotherapy only when the latter was applied as a once-daily injection of NPH insulin. Conversely, twice-daily insulin monotherapy (NPH or mixed insulin) provided superior glycaemic control to insulin-OHA combination therapy regimens where insulin was administered as a single morning injection. In more conventional comparisons, regimens utilising OHAs with bedtime NPH insulin provided comparable glycaemic control to insulin monotherapy (administered as twice daily, or multiple daily injections). Overall, insulin-OHA combination therapy was associated with a 43% relative reduction in total daily insulin requirement compared to insulin monotherapy. Of the 14 studies (22 comparisons) reporting hypoglycaemia, 13 demonstrated no significant difference in the frequency of symptomatic or biochemical hypoglycaemia between insulin and combination therapy regimens. No significant differences in quality of life related issues were detected. Combination therapy with bedtime NPH insulin resulted in statistically significantly less weight gain compared to insulin monotherapy, provided metformin was used +/-sulphonylurea. In all other comparisons no significant differences with respect to weight gain were detected.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Bedtime NPH insulin combined with oral hypoglycaemic agents provides comparable glycaemic control to insulin monotherapy and is associated with less weight gain if metformin is used.

Effects of Type 2 Diabetes on the Regulation of Hepatic Glucose Metabolism

Glucose production is inappropriately increased in people with type 2 diabetes both before and after food ingestion. Excessive postprandial glucose production occurs in the presence of decreased and delayed insulin secretion and lack of suppression of glucagon release. These abnormalities in hormone secretion, coupled with impaired insulin-induced suppression of glucose production and stimulation of splanchnic glucose uptake, likely account in large part for the excessive amounts of glucose that reach the systemic circulation for disposal by peripheral tissues following food ingestion. In contrast, when adequate basal insulin concentrations are present, neither glucagon-induced stimulation of glucose production nor glucose-induced suppression of glucose production differs in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects matched for gender, age, and degree of obesity. However, when insulin secretion is defective, lack of suppression of glucagon can cause substantial hyperglycemia by enhancing rates of glucose production. Therefore, normalization of hepatic glucose metabolism in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus likely will require normalization of insulin and glucagon secretion as well as hepatic insulin action.

Insulin dose-response curves for stimulation of splanchnic glucose uptake and suppression of endogenous glucose production differ in nondiabetic humans and are abnormal in people with type 2 diabetes

To determine whether the insulin dose-response curves for suppression of endogenous glucose production (EGP) and stimulation of splanchnic glucose uptake (SGU) differ in nondiabetic humans and are abnormal in type 2 diabetes, 14 nondiabetic and 12 diabetic subjects were studied. Glucose was clamped at approximately 9.5 mmol/l and endogenous hormone secretion inhibited by somatostatin, while glucagon and growth hormone were replaced by an exogenous infusion. Insulin was progressively increased from approximately 150 to approximately 350 and approximately 700 pmol/l by means of an exogenous insulin infusion, while EGP, SGU, and leg glucose uptake (LGU) were measured using the splanchnic and leg catheterization methods, combined with a [3-3H]glucose infusion. In nondiabetic subjects, an increase in insulin from approximately 150 to approximately 350 pmol/l resulted in maximal suppression of EGP, whereas SGU continued to increase (P < 0.001) when insulin was increased to approximately 700 pmol/l. In contrast, EGP progressively decreased (P < 0.001) and SGU progressively increased (P < 0.001) in the diabetic subjects as insulin increased from approximately 150 to approximately 700 pmol/l. Although EGP was higher (P < 0.01) in the diabetic than nondiabetic subjects only at the lowest insulin concentration, SGU was lower (P < 0.01) in the diabetic subjects at all insulin concentrations tested. On the other hand, in contrast to LGU and overall glucose disposal, the increment in SGU in response to both increments in insulin did not differ in the diabetic and nondiabetic subjects, implying a right shifted but parallel dose-response curve. These data indicate that the dose-response curves for suppression of glucose production and stimulation of glucose uptake differ in nondiabetic subjects and are abnormal in people with type 2 diabetes. Taken together, these data also suggest that agents that enhance SGU in diabetic patients (e.g. glucokinase activators) are likely to improve glucose tolerance.

Both fasting glucose production and disappearance are abnormal in people with "mild" and "severe" type 2 diabetes

To determine whether regulation of fasting endogenous glucose production (EGP) and glucose disappearance (R(d)) are both abnormal in people with type 2 diabetes, EGP and R(d) were measured in 7 "severe" (SD), 9 "mild" (MD), and 12 nondiabetic (ND) subjects (12.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 8.1 +/- 0.4 vs. 5.1 +/- 0.4 mmol/l) after an overnight fast and during a hyperglycemic pancreatic clamp. Fasting insulin was higher in both the SD and MD than ND subjects, whereas fasting glucagon only was increased (P < 0.05) in SD. Fasting EGP, glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis, and R(d) all were increased (P < 0.05) in SD but did not differ in MD or ND. On the other hand, when glucose ( approximately 11 mmol/l), insulin ( approximately 72 pmol/l), and glucagon ( approximately 140 pg/ml) concentrations were raised to values similar to those observed in the severe diabetic subjects, EGP was higher (P < 0.001) and R(d) lower (P < 0.01) in both SD and MD than in ND. The higher EGP in the SD and MD than ND during the clamp was the result of increased (P < 0.05) rates of glycogenolysis (4.2 +/- 1.7 vs. 3.5 +/- 1.0 vs. 0.0 +/- 0.8 micromol.kg(-1).min(-1)), since gluconeogenesis did not differ among groups. We conclude that neither glucose production nor disappearance is appropriate for the prevailing glucose and insulin concentrations in people with mild or severe diabetes. Both increased rates of gluconeogenesis (likely because of higher glucagon concentrations) and lack of suppression of glycogenolysis contribute to excessive glucose production in type 2 diabetics.

Demonstration of glycated insulin in human diabetic plasma and decreased biological activity assessed by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp technique in humans

The presence and biological significance of circulating glycated insulin has been evaluated by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), radioimmunoassay (RIA), receptor binding, and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp techniques. ESI-MS analysis of an HPLC-purified plasma pool from four male type 2 diabetic subjects (HbA(1c) 8.1 +/- 0.2%, plasma glucose 8.7 +/- 1.3 mmol/l [means +/- SE]) revealed two major insulin-like peaks with retention times of 14-16 min. After spectral averaging, the peak with retention time of 14.32 min exhibited a prominent triply charged (M+3H)(3+) species at 1,991.1 m/z, representing monoglycated insulin with an intact M(r) of 5,970.3 Da. The second peak (retention time 15.70 min) corresponded to native insulin (M(r) 5,807.6 Da), with the difference between the two peptides (162.7 Da) representing a single glucitol adduct (theoretical 164 Da). Measurement of glycated insulin in plasma of type 2 diabetic subjects by specific RIA gave circulating levels of 10.1 +/- 2.3 pmol/l, corresponding to approximately 9% total insulin. Biological activity of pure synthetic monoglycated insulin (insulin B-chain Phe(1)-glucitol adduct) was evaluated in seven overnight-fasted healthy nonobese male volunteers using two-step euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps (2 h at 16.6 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1), followed by 2 h at 83.0 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1); corresponding to 0.4 and 2.0 mU x kg(-1) x min(-1)). At the lower dose, the exogenous glucose infusion rates required to maintain euglycemia during steady state were significantly lower with glycated insulin (P < 0.01) and approximately 70% more glycated insulin was required to induce a similar rate of insulin-mediated glucose uptake. Maximal responses at the higher rates of infusion were similar for glycated and control insulin. Inhibitory effects on endogenous glucose production, insulin secretion, and lipolysis, as indicated by measurements of C-peptide, nonesterified free fatty acids, and glycerol, were also similar. Receptor binding to CHO-T cells transfected with human insulin receptor and in vivo metabolic clearance revealed no differences between glycated and native insulin, suggesting that impaired biological activity is due to a postreceptor effect. The present demonstration of glycated insulin in human plasma and related impairment of physiological insulin-mediated glucose uptake suggests a role for glycated insulin in glucose toxicity and impaired insulin action in type 2 diabetes.

Gliclazide increases insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation but not p38 phosphorylation in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle cells

Sulfonylurea drugs are used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The mechanism of action of sulfonylureas is to release insulin from pancreatic cells and they have been proposed to act on insulin-sensitive tissues to enhance glucose uptake. The goal of the present study was to test the hypothesis that gliclazide, a second-generation sulfonylurea, could enhance insulin signaling in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle cells. We demonstrated that gliclazide enhanced insulin-stimulated insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle cells. Although insulin receptor substrate-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was unaffected by gliclazide treatment, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity was partially restored by treatment with gliclazide. No increase in 2-deoxyglucose uptake in insulin-resistant cells by treatment with gliclazide was observed. Further investigations into the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway revealed that insulin-stimulated p38 phosphorylation was impaired, as compared with extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase(JNK), which were phosphorylated normally in insulin-resistant cells. Treatment with gliclazide could not restore p38 phosphorylation in insulin-resistant cells. We propose that gliclazide can regulate part of the insulin signaling in insulin-resistant skeletal muscle, and p38 could be a potential therapeutic target for glucose uptake to treat insulin resistance.

Comparison of insulin monotherapy and combination therapy with insulin and metformin or insulin and troglitazone in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with insulin alone, insulin plus metformin, or insulin plus troglitazone in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 88 type 2 diabetic subjects using insulin monotherapy (baseline HbA(lc) 8.7%) were randomly assigned to insulin alone (n = 31), insulin plus metformin (n = 27), or insulin plus troglitazone (n = 30) for 4 months. The insulin dose was increased only in the insulin group. Metformin was titrated to a maximum dose of 2,000 mg and troglitazone to 600 mg.

RESULTS

HbA(lc) levels decreased in all groups, the lowest level occurring in the insulin plus troglitazone group (insulin alone to 7.0%, insulin plus metformin to 7.1%, and insulin plus troglitazone to 6.4%, P < 0.0001). The dose of insulin increased by 55 units/day in the insulin alone group (P < 0.0001) and decreased by 1.4 units/day in the insulin plus metformin group and 12.8 units/day in the insulin plus troglitazone group (insulin plus metformin versus insulin plus troglitazone, P = 0.004). Body weight increased by 0.5 kg in the insulin plus metformin group, whereas the other two groups gained 4.4 kg (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Triglyceride and VLDL triglyceride levels significantly improved only in the insulin plus troglitazone group. Subjects taking metformin experienced significantly more gastrointestinal side effects and less hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive insulin therapy significantly improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetic subjects to levels comparable with those achieved by adding metformin to insulin therapy. Troglitazone was the most effective in lowering HbA(lc), total daily insulin dose, and triglyceride levels. However, treatment with insulin plus metformin was advantageous in avoiding weight gain and hypoglycemia.

Effects of insulin treatment in type 2 diabetic patients on intracellular lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle

Insulin resistance is frequently associated with increased lipid content in muscle and liver. Insulin excess stimulates tissue lipid accumulation. To examine the effects of insulin and improved glycemia on insulin sensitivity and intracellular lipids, we performed stepped (1, 2, and 4 mU x min(-1) x kg(-1)) hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps in eight type 2 diabetic and six nondiabetic control subjects at baseline and after 12 and 67 h of insulin-mediated near-normoglycemia (118 +/- 7 mg/dl). Intrahepatocellular lipids (IHCLs) and intramyocellular lipids (IMCLs) of soleus (IMCL-S) and tibialis anterior muscle (IMCL-TA) were measured with (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. At baseline, nondiabetic subjects had an approximate twofold higher insulin sensitivity (P < 0.02) and lower IHCLs than diabetic patients (5.8 +/- 1.2 vs. 18.3 +/- 4.2%, P < 0.03), in whom IMCL-TA negatively correlated with insulin sensitivity (r = -0.969, P < 0.001). After a 67-h insulin infusion in diabetic patients, IMCL-S and IHCLs were increased (P < 0.05) by approximately 36 and approximately 18%, respectively, and correlated positively with insulin sensitivity (IMCL-S: r = 0.982, P < 0.0005; IHCL: r = 0.865, P < 0.03), whereas fasting glucose production, measured with D-[6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose, decreased by approximately 10% (P < 0.04). In conclusion, these results indicate that IMCLs relate to insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients at baseline and that insulin-mediated near-normoglycemia for approximately 3 days reduces fasting glucose production but stimulates lipid accumulation in liver and muscle without affecting insulin sensitivity.

Normalization of plasma glucose concentration by insulin therapy improves insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis in type 2 diabetes

Considerable evidence suggests that skeletal muscle insulin resistance is an inherent feature of type 2 diabetes and contributes to the pathogenesis of the disease. In patients with poorly controlled diabetes, hyperglycemia is thought to produce additional insulin resistance in muscle. The magnitude and nature of hyperglycemia-induced insulin resistance is not known. The purpose of the present study was to determine the biochemical mechanisms responsible for increased insulin-stimulated glucose disposal after the achievement of tight glycemic control with a mixed-split regimen. We performed hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps with indirect calorimetry and vastus lateralis muscle biopsies in eight type 2 diabetic patients who had poor glycemic control (HbA(1c) 10.1%) and again after 3 months of intensive insulin therapy designed to produce near-normoglycemia (HbA(1c) 6.6%). Improved glycemic control increased insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (5.16 +/- 0.32 vs. 3.69 +/- 0.33 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.01); nonoxidative glucose disposal, which primarily reflects glycogen synthesis (2.11 +/- 0.26 vs. 0.90 +/- 0.16 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.01); and glycogen synthase fractional velocity (0.094 +/- 0.017 vs. 0.045 +/- 0.007; P < 0.05). There was no improvement in insulin-stimulated glucose oxidation (3.05 +/- 0.25 vs. 2.79 +/- 0.20 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1)), hexokinase II mRNA expression (increase over basal values), or hexokinase II enzymatic activity (0.51 +/- 0.16 vs. 0.42 +/- 0.18 pmol x min(-1) x microg(-1) protein). All of the increase in insulin-stimulated glucose disposal could be accounted for by increased glycogen synthesis, which is likely attributable to increased activation of glycogen synthase by insulin.

The importance of first-phase insulin secretion: implications for the therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by defects in insulin secretion and action. Insulin resistance is a key feature of type 2 diabetes. However, insulin resistance alone does not appear to be sufficient to cause diabetes. Longitudinal studies have shown that the development of overt hyperglycemia is associated with a decline in beta-cell secretion. In patients with impaired glucose tolerance or in the early stages of type 2 diabetes, first-phase insulin release is almost invariably lost despite the enhancement of second-phase secretion. Both animal and human studies support the critical physiologic role of the first-phase of insulin secretion in the maintenance of postmeal glucose homeostasis. This effect is primarily mediated at the level of the liver, allowing prompt inhibition of endogenous glucose production (EGP) and thereby restraining the mealtime rise in plasma glucose. In type 2 diabetes, the loss of the early surge of insulin release is a precocious and quite common defect that plays a pathogenic role in postmeal hyperglycemia and one that may require specific therapeutic intervention. This becomes even more apparent if the negative impact of prandial glucose spikes is taken into consideration. Epidemiological evidence exists to indicate that 2-h postload plasma glucose levels are strongly associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality relative risk. Indeed the acute elevation of plasma glucose concentration triggers an array of tissue responses that may contribute to the development of diabetic complications. Considering that type 2 diabetes begins with meal-related hyperglycemia in many patients, it becomes apparent that normalization of postmeal plasma glucose levels should be the target for rational therapy and the goal in the early stages of the disease. If a primary goal of diabetes therapy is control of postmeal glucose excursion, then the regulation of glucose absorption from the gut and entry into the circulation is an important mechanism to consider. The restoration of the rapid increase in plasma insulin concentration may be quite an efficient therapeutic approach.

Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance

Diabetes mellitus type 2 is a world-wide growing health problem affecting more than 150 million people at the beginning of the new millennium. It is believed that this number will double in the next 25 yr. The pathophysiological hallmarks of type 2 diabetes mellitus consist of insulin resistance, pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction, and increased endogenous glucose production. To reduce the marked increase of cardiovascular mortality of type 2 diabetic subjects, optimal treatment aims at normalization of body weight, glycemia, blood pressure, and lipidemia. This review focuses on the pathophysiology and molecular pathogenesis of insulin resistance and on the capability of antihyperglycemic pharmacological agents to treat insulin resistance, i.e., a-glucosidase inhibitors, biguanides, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and insulin. Finally, a rational treatment approach is proposed based on the dynamic pathophysiological abnormalities of this highly heterogeneous and progressive disease.

Inefficiency of insulin therapy to correct apolipoprotein A-I metabolic abnormalities in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is associated with low high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and apoA-I, related to an increased apoA-I fractional catabolic rate. This stable isotope kinetic experiment, using L-[1-(13)C] leucine, was designed to study the effect of insulin therapy on HDL apoA-I and A-II metabolism in poorly controlled NIDDM patients. A kinetic study was performed in five control subjects and in six NIDDM patients before and two months after the introduction of insulin therapy. ApoA-I and A-II were modelled using a monoexponential function. Insulin treatment was able to correct neither the low HDL apoA-I concentration observed in NIDDM patients (1.14+/-0.19 vs. 1.16+/-0. 12 g l(-1) (controls: 1.33+/-0.14)), nor the HDL apoA-I hypercatabolism (0.39+/-0.11 vs. 0.34+/-0.05 pool d(-1), (controls: 0.23+/-0.01, P< 0.01)). HDL apoA-I production rate was increased in NIDDM patients compared to control subjects and was not modified by insulin (0.45+/-0.12 vs. 0.39+/-0.08 g d(-1) l(-1), (controls: 0. 31+/-0.04, P< 0.05)). HDL apoA-II kinetic parameters were initially not significantly different between NIDDM patients and control subjects, and were not modified by insulin. The decreased insulin sensitivity, assessed by the insulin suppressive test, was not modified by insulin therapy in NIDDM patients. HDL apoA-I fractional catabolic rate was significantly correlated to HDL triglyceride/cholesteryl ester and triglyceride/protein ratios, which were significantly higher in NIDDM patients than in controls and were not modified by insulin therapy. The persistence of insulin resistance and of high neutral lipid exchanges between triglyceride rich lipoproteins and HDL in insulin-treated NIDDM patients probably explain the inefficiency of insulin therapy to correct HDL apoA-I metabolic abnormalities.

Insulin and glucosamine infusions increase O-linked N-acetyl-glucosamine in skeletal muscle proteins in vivo

O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc) is an abundant posttranslational modification of serine/threonine residues of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins. We determined whether insulin or coinfusion of glucosamine (GlcN) with insulin alters O-GlcNAc of skeletal muscle proteins. Three groups of conscious fasted rats received 6-hour infusions of either saline (BAS), insulin 18 mU/kg.min and saline (INS), or insulin and GlcN 30 micromol/kg.min (GLCN) during maintenance of normoglycemia. At 6 hours, the concentrations of muscle UDP-GlcNAc, UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine (UDP-GalNAc), UDP-glucose (UDP-Glc), UDP-galactose (UDP-Gal), glycogen, and N and O-linked GlcNAc (galactosyltransferase labeling followed by beta elimination) were measured in freeze-clamped abdominis muscle. Insulin increased whole-body glucose uptake from 49 +/- 5 to 239 +/- 8 micromol/kg.min (P < .001) and glycogen in abdominis muscle from 138 +/- 11 to 370 +/- 26 mmol/kg dry weight (P < .001). Insulin increased the amount of cytosolic N - and O-linked GlcNAc by 56% from 362 +/- 30 to 564 +/- 45 dpm/microg protein . 100 min (P < .02), and O-GlcNAc from 221 +/- 16 to 339 +/- 27 dpm/microg . 100 min (P < .02). Glycogen content was positively correlated with the amount of total (r = .90, P < .005) and O-linked GlcNAc in insulin-infused animals. Coinfusion of GlcN with insulin increased muscle UDP-GlcNAc about fourfold (100 +/- 6 nmol/g) compared with insulin (27 +/- 1, P < .001) or saline (25 +/- 1, P < .001) infusion. GlcN also decreased glucose uptake over 6 hours by 30% to 168 +/- 8 micromol/kg . min (P < .001 for GLCN v INS) and muscle glycogen to 292 +/- 24 mmol/kg dry weight (P < .05 for GLCN v INS). Both total (635 +/- 60 dpm/microg . 100 min, P < .002) and O-linked GlcNAc (375 +/- 36 dpm/microg . 100 min, P < .002) in the cytosol were significantly higher in GLCN rats (635 +/- 60 dpm/microg) versus BAS rats (P < .002). As in INS rats, muscle glycogen and O-GlcNAc were positively correlated in GLCN rats (r = .54, P < .05). Variation in total and O-linked GlcNAc in GLCN rats was due both to GlcN (P < .02) and to variation in the glycogen content (P < .005).

Pioglitazone (AD-4833) ameliorates insulin resistance in patients with NIDDM. AD-4833 Glucose Clamp Study Group, Japan

We evaluated the effect of pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione compound, on insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (Rd) and its efficacy on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Twenty NIDDM subjects (mean age 58.2+/-9.4 year, body mass index (BMI) 23.9+/-3.4 kg/ m2 (mean+/-S.D.], three with diet alone, 17 with sulfonylureas [SU]) participated in this trial from five diabetes clinics. Euglycemic (5.3 mmol/liter) hyperinsulinemic (insulin infusion rate 9 micromoles x kg[-1] x min[-1]) clamp studies were performed before and after oral administration of pioglitazone (30 mg/day) for 87+/-10 days. The Rd significantly improved from 5.5+/-2.5 to 8.3+/-3.1 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level significantly decreased from 11.0+/-2.0 mmol/liter to 8.9+/-1.1 mmol/liter with a significant improvement in the hemoglobin A1c level from 9.2+/-1.8% to 8.3+/-1.5%. Fasting serum insulin and C peptide levels decreased from 83+/-36 pmol/liter and 0.62+/-0.21 nmol/liter to 66+/-29 pmol/liter and 0.58+/-0.25 nmol/liter, respectively. Fasting serum triglyceride and free fatty acids levels significantly decreased with concomitant increase of fasting serum HDL-cholesterol levels from 1.2+/-0.2 to 1.5+/-0.3 mmol/liter. The change in Rd between before and after pioglitazone administration correlated with baseline values of FPG (rho=0.633), serum insulin (rho=0.653), BMI (rho=0.456), Rd (rho 0.558) and 1,5-AG (rho=-0.522). These data indicate that pioglitazone enhances the insulin action in NIDDM patients on diet alone or SU, and thereby improves both plasma glucose level and lipid profiles.

A comparison of the effects of low- and conventional-dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in hypertensive patients with NIDDM

In conventional doses, thiazide diuretics impair glucose tolerance and decrease insulin sensitivity, making them an unpopular choice for treating diabetic patients with hypertension. However, use of low-dose thiazide diuretics may avoid the adverse metabolic effects seen with conventional doses. In a double-blind, randomised crossover study we assessed peripheral and hepatic insulin action in 13 hypertensive non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients after a 6-week placebo run-in and following two 12-week treatment periods with either low (1.25 mg) or conventional (5.0mg) dose bendrofluazide. There were no differences between doses in their effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Bendrofluazide 1.25 mg had significantly less effect on serum potassium, uric acid, fasting glucose and HbA1C concentrations than the 5.00 mg dose. Exogenous glucose infusion rates required to maintain euglycaemia were significantly different between doses (p < 0.05) with conventional-dose bendrofluazide worsening peripheral insulin resistance compared to baseline (23.8 +/- 2.9 vs 27.3 +/- 3.5 mumol.kg-1.min-1, p < 0.05) and low-dose bendrofluazide producing no change compared to baseline (26.8 +/- 3.6 vs 27.3 +/- 3.5 mumol.kg-1.min-1, p = NS). Postabsorptive endogenous glucose production was higher on treatment with bendrofluazide 5.0 mg compared to 1.25 mg (11.7 +/- 0.5 vs 10.2 +/- 0.3 mumol.kg-1.min-1, p < 0.05) and suppressed to a lesser extent following insulin (4.0 +/- 0.7 vs 2.0 +/- 0.4 mumol.kg-1.min-1, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical trials in chronic diseases

In spite of rather negative publicity on the crossover/self-controlled design for clinical trials in the early 1980s, a fair number of these studies were published in that period. Using these studies as examples, we try to give an overview of major advantages and disadvantages of crossover and parallel group studies. Strengths of the crossover versus the parallel design include: (1) elimination of between-subject variability of symptoms; (2) no need for large samples; (3) fewer ethical problems; and (4) subjects are able to express their preference for one of the compounds being given. Weaknesses include: (1) carryover effect from one treatment period into the other; and (2) time effect due to spontaneously evolving symptoms in a lengthy trial. Although routinely used for all types of therapies in phase I/II studies, the crossover/self-controlled design cannot be used in phase III/IV studies other than for symptomatic treatments of stable disease. Treatments of chronic diseases are directed primarily to the relief of persistent symptoms rather than the cure of a rapidly evolving symptomatology. These very aspects make them particularly suitable for crossover/self-controlled studies. Awareness of the weaknesses of clinical trials is especially important to clinical practitioners, who depend on reported clinical trials when making clinical decisions.

Effects of early introduction of intensive insulin therapy on the clinical course in non-obese NIDDM patients

In order to reconsider the extent of indication of insulin therapy in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), we performed the following trial in a prospective fashion. At the beginning phase of treatment for diabetes, we introduced intensive insulin therapy in 22 non-obese (Body mass index approximately 24 kg/m2) NIDDM patients without proliferative retinopathy, who were selected in a standardized fashion, avoiding any arbitrary choice. None had received oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) or insulin yet. By administering insulin 3 or 4 times a day, strict glycemic control was attained and maintained, and then the insulin dose was gradually lowered while keeping good glycemic control. In patients whose glycemic control was maintained at an excellent level for more than 7 days under an insulin dosage lower than 8 u/day, insulin therapy was discontinued. As a result, 15 patients (68%) attained good glycemic control both without insulin and OHA almost within a month and 6 patients (27%) shifted to OHA. It is recommended to introduce intensive insulin therapy in non-obese NIDDM patients without proliferative retinopathy and to aim at attaining good glycemic control both without insulin and OHA.

Insulin binding in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is correlated with glycemic control: clinical evidence for abnormal receptor regulation in NIDDM

Insulin binding has been reported to be decreased in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Although elevated basal insulin concentrations have been correlated with decreased insulin binding in obesity, this relationship has not been found in NIDDM. To determine the potential cause(s) of the decrease, we measured 125I-insulin binding to circulating monocytes isolated from 31 non-insulin-treated patients with NIDDM who had a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration greater than 7.8 mmol/L and 13 control subjects. We examined the influence of obesity, insulin concentration, glycemic control, and treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents on insulin binding in a cross-sectional study. Insulin binding was significantly decreased in the entire NIDDM group (mean +/- SEM, %/10(7) monocytes: 4.65 +/- 0.33) as compared with controls (6.45 +/- .70, P < .02). Subgroups defined by obesity (relative body weight > 1.2) and poor glycemic control (FPG > 11.1 mmol/L) and those not taking oral hypoglycemic agents had significantly lower insulin binding (P < .02). However, neither relative body weight nor insulin concentrations (basal or stimulated) correlated with insulin binding. Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that only FPG significantly correlated with insulin binding (r = -.45, P = .002) even when oral hypoglycemic agent-treated patients were removed from the analysis (r = -.50, P = .003). There was no significant contribution to explain insulin binding by the other variables, including diagnosis of diabetes, obesity, insulin concentration, or treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents. We conclude that poor metabolic control is associated with an alteration in insulin receptor regulation in NIDDM.

Low-dose oral glyburide reduces fasting blood glucose by decreasing hepatic glucose production in healthy volunteers without increasing carbohydrate oxidation

Glyburide is an effective hypoglycemic agent in patients with type II diabetes even after the loss of its ability to increase insulin secretion. The exact mechanism is unknown. In an attempt to describe the direct effect of glyburide on glucose metabolism, a very low dose of glyburide (20 micrograms/kg body weight) was given orally to 12 healthy volunteers in an attempt to increase blood concentrations of the drug without causing a marked increase in insulin secretion. Fasting hepatic glucose production (HGP), carbohydrate oxidation (CO), leucine appearance, leucine oxidation, and fat oxidation were determined between hours 3 and 4 and hours 7 and 8. The changes seen in the glyburide-treated volunteers were compared with the changes seen in 5 non-treated, healthy volunteers during the same 8-hour period. Mean blood glucose decreased greater in the glyburide-treated volunteers (20 +/- 2% vs 5 +/- 2%, P < 0.01). Insulin and C-peptide concentrations after glyburide administration (hour 7 to 8) did not differ significantly from baseline (hour 3 to 4) values (insulin: 53 +/- 9 pmol/L vs 52 +/- 9 pmol/L; C-peptide: 0.34 +/- 0.06 ng/mL vs 0.39 +/- 0.07 ng/mL). This low dose of glyburide resulted in a significantly greater decrease in HGP (16 +/- 2%; P < 0.001) than seen with fasting alone (8 +/- 4%; P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Assessment of insulin action and glucose effectiveness in diabetic and nondiabetic humans

Insulin concentrations in humans continuously change and typically increase only when glucose also increases such as with eating. In this setting, it is not known whether the severity of hepatic and extrahepatic insulin resistance is comparable and whether the ability of glucose to regulate its own uptake and release is defective in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). To address this question, NIDDM and nondiabetic subjects were studied when glucose concentrations were clamped at either 5 mM (euglycemia) or varied so as to mimic the glucose concentrations observed in nondiabetic humans after food ingestion (hyperglycemia). Insulin was infused so as to simulate a "nondiabetic" postprandial profile. During euglycemia, insulin increased glucose disposal in nondiabetic but not diabetic subjects indicating marked extrahepatic resistance. In contrast, insulin-induced suppression of glucose release was only minimally less (P < 0.05) in diabetic than nondiabetic subjects (-1.06 +/- 0.09 vs. -1.47 +/- 0.21 nmol.kg-1 per 4 h). Hyperglycemia substantially enhanced disposal in both groups. Glucose effectiveness measured as the magnitude of enhancement of disposal (0.59 +/- 0.18 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.17 nmollkg-1 per 4 h) and suppression of release (-0.36 +/- 0.12 vs. -0.14 +/- 0.12 nmol.kg-1 per 4 h) did not differ in the diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. In conclusion, when assessed in the presence of a physiological insulin profile, people with NIDDM demonstrate: (a) profound extrahepatic insulin resistance, (b) modest hepatic insulin resistance, and (c) normal ability of glucose to stimulate its own uptake and suppress its own release.

A long-term, randomized, comparative study of insulin versus sulfonylurea therapy in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVES

To study the effect of insulin and sulfonylurea (SU) therapy on glycaemic control, insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetic subjects.

DESIGN

A prospective, parallel, randomized, controlled, long-term study.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic in tertiary referral centre.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-six type 2 diabetic subjects treated with diet and SU, aged 44-69 years and a duration of diabetes of between 2 and 14 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Individually adjusted doses of insulin and glibenclamide.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin resistance (euglycaemic glucose clamp), levels of lipids, lipoproteins and blood pressure.

RESULTS

Glycaemic control improved during insulin treatment, but deteriorated on SU; HbA1c levels differed significantly between groups after 12 months of therapy (mean +/- SEM 7.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 9.5 +/- 0.4%, P = 0.004). Body mass index increased significantly during insulin treatment (26.4 +/- 0.7 to 27.8 +/- 0.7 kg/m2, P = 0.0001) and 30% of this increase was a result of an increase in lean body mass. The total glucose disposal rate showed a small increase in the insulin group. Levels of triglycerides and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced during insulin treatment (1.8 +/- 0.2 to 1.5 +/- 0.2 mmol L-1, P = 0.03 and 1.58 +/- 0.1 to 1.40 +/- 0.08 g L-1, P = 0.003), and insulin prevented a reduction in the levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein A-1 and an increase in Lp(a) lipoprotein observed in the SU group. Blood pressure levels did not change during therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin therapy was superior to SU treatment in achieving good metabolic control. Despite a modest improvement in cardiovascular risk factors in the insulin-treated group, no significant differences were observed between the groups after 1 year's treatment.

Effects of glipizide on glucose metabolism and muscle content of the insulin-regulatable glucose transporter (GLUT 4) and glycogen synthase activity during hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetic patients

To examine whether sulphonylureas influence hyperglycaemia-induced glucose disposal and suppression of hepatic glucose production (HGP) in type 2 diabetes mellitus, a 150-min hyperglycaemic (plasma glucose 14 mmol/l) clamp with concomitant somatostatin infusion was used in eight type 2 diabetic patients before and after 6 weeks of glipizide (GZ) therapy. During the clamp a small replacement dose of insulin was given (0.15 mU/kg per min). Isotopically determined glucose-induced glucose uptake was similar before and after GZ administration which led to improved glycaemic control (basal plasma glucose 12.2 +/- 1.3 vs 8.9 +/- 0.7 mmol/l; P < 0.01). Glucose-induced suppression of HGP was, however, more pronounced during GZ treatment (0.96 +/- 0.14 vs 1.44 +/- 0.20 mg/kg per min; P < 0.02). Following GZ treatment hyperglycaemia failed to stimulate glycogen synthase activity. Moreover, GZ resulted in a significant increase in the immunoreactive abundance of the insulin-regulatable glucose transport protein (GLUT 4) (P < 0.02). In conclusion, these results suggest that GZ therapy in type 2 diabetic patients enhances hepatic sensitivity to hyperglycaemia, while glucose-induced glucose uptake remains unaffected. In addition, GZ tends to normalize the activity of glycogen synthase and increases the content of GLUT 4 protein in skeletal muscle.

DIACATOR: simulation of metabolic abnormalities of type II diabetes mellitus by use of a personal computer

A computer program has been developed to simulate non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type 2). This disease is characterized by an impaired function of the pancreatic beta-cell and by an insufficient insulin sensitivity of the peripheral tissue. The program simulates the dependences of glucose utilization, glucose production and serum insulin level as a function of glucose and insulin and displays the results as curves on the screen. Six different states of diabetes/glucose intolerance as well as a healthy state can be selected. Renal glucose excretion can be adjusted by selection of the glomerular filtration rate. Action of sulphonylureas are simulated by changing the insulin secretion rate of the beta-cell, biguanides enhance sensitivity of the peripheral tissue for insulin and Acarbose delays glucose absorption from the intestines. Model parameters are taken from the literature. The program can be used for computer-aided medical education and for simulation of special problems in research.

Sulfonylureas activate glycogen phosphorylase and increase cytosolic free-Ca2+ levels in isolated rat hepatocytes

Without causing significant changes in cellular levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), the addition of either glibenclamide or gliquidone to isolated rat hepatocytes caused a transient dose- and Ca(2+)-dependent activation of glycogen phosphorylase. The calculated concentrations corresponding to half-maximal activation were 5 and 2 mumol/L, respectively. In connection with this, it was observed that glibenclamide provoked a dose-dependent increase in cytosolic free-calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) in Fura-2-loaded hepatocytes. Moreover, the presence of glibenclamide in the incubation medium accelerated the rate of Ca2+ uptake by Ca(2+)-depleted hepatocytes. These findings suggest that an increase in [Ca2+]i could mediate some of the effects of sulfonylureas in liver metabolism.