A randomized controlled trial of prednisone in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Ten tips on immunosuppression in primary membranous nephropathy

Membranous nephropathy (MN) management poses challenges, particularly in selecting appropriate immunosuppressive treatments (IST) and monitoring disease progression and complications. This article highlights 10 key tips for the management of primary MN based on current evidence and clinical experience. First, we advise against prescribing IST to patients without nephrotic syndrome (NS), emphasizing the need for close monitoring of disease progression. Second, we recommend initiating IST in patients with persistent NS or declining kidney function. Third, we suggest prescribing rituximab (RTX) or RTX combined with calcineurin inhibitors in medium-risk patients. Fourth, we propose cyclophosphamide-based immunosuppression for high-risk patients. Fifth, we discourage the use of glucocorticoid monotherapy or mycophenolate mofetil as initial treatments. Sixth, we underscore the importance of preventing infectious complications in patients receiving IST. Seventh, we emphasize the need for personalized monitoring of IST by closely measuring kidney function, proteinuria, serum albumin and anti-M-type phospholipase A2 receptor levels. Eighth, we recommend a stepwise approach in the treatment of resistant disease. Ninth, we advise adjusting treatment for relapses based on individual risk profiles. Finally, we caution about the potential recurrence of MN after kidney transplantation and suggest appropriate monitoring and treatment strategies for post-transplantation MN. These tips provide comprehensive guidance for clinicians managing MN, aiming to optimize patient outcomes and minimize complications.

The place of cyclical therapy for the treatment of membranous nephropathy in the era of rituximab

Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults, due to a variety of autoantibodies, most frequently against phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R). In severe cases or when spontaneous remission is not achieved, immunosuppression is required. Cyclical therapy, based on glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide on alternate months for 6 months, has proven effective to induce remission and reduce the risk of end-stage renal disease. Since the early 2000s, rituximab (RTX) has emerged as a key player in the management of MN, showing overall comparable effectiveness and likely better safety compared with the cyclical regimen, despite the lack of adequately powered trials comparing the two approaches head to head. For these reasons, RTX is now considered the agent of choice for most patients with MN. However, there are still uncertainties. Around 20-40% of patients are resistant to RTX, especially in the setting of high anti-PLA2R levels, and this drug remains relatively unexplored in patients with the most severe disease. In these scenarios, although the expanding therapeutic armamentarium is probably going to provide further options, the cyclical regimen still plays a key role as a safety net. The aim of this article is to illustrate the role of cyclical therapy in the RTX era.

Prognosis and incidence of infections in chronic kidney disease patients with membranous nephropathy enrolled in a large Japanese clinical claims database

BACKGROUND

The treatment of membranous nephropathy involves a combination of conservative approaches, steroids, and immunosuppressive agents. Infection is an adverse effect of these treatments and its incidence is a critical issue for patients with membranous nephropathy, as many of them are older adults. However, the incidence of infections remains unclear; hence, this study investigated this issue using data from a large Japanese clinical claims database.

METHODS

From a database of patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 924,238), those diagnosed with membranous nephropathy from April 2008 to August 2021 with a history of one or more prescriptions and undergoing medical care were included. Patients who had undergone kidney replacement therapy were excluded. Patients were divided into three groups based on their prescriptions after diagnosis: prednisolone(PSL), who received steroids; PSL + IS, who were prescribed steroids and immunosuppressive agents; and C, who were treated without steroid or immunosuppressive agent use. The primary outcome was death or the initiation of kidney replacement therapy. The secondary outcome was death or hospitalization due to infection. Infectious diseases such as sepsis, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, cellulitis, cytomegalovirus infection, colitis, or hepatitis were defined as infections. Hazard ratios were expressed using group C as a reference.

RESULTS

Of 1,642 patients, the incidence of the primary outcome occurred in 62/460 individuals in the PSL group, 81/635 individuals in the PSL + IS group, and 47/547 individuals in the C group. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed no significant differences (P = 0.088). The incidence of secondary outcomes occurred in 80/460 individuals, 102/635 individuals, and 37/547 individuals in the PSL, PSL + IS, and C groups, respectively. The incidence of secondary outcomes was significantly higher in the PSL group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.43 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-3.62, P < 0.01]) and PSL + IS group (HR 2.23 [95% CI 1.51-3.30, P < 0.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of membranous nephropathy was not completely satisfactory. Patients who use steroids and immunosuppressive agents have a high incidence of infection and may require close monitoring during the course of treatment.High-efficacy treatment with a low incidence of infections is desirable. The significance of this study lies in the fact that the impressions of membranous nephropathy, which have been recognized as tacit knowledge, were quantified using a clinical database.

Negative Modulation of B Cell Activation by Melanocortin 1 Receptor Signaling Protects against Membranous Nephropathy

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Emerging evidence suggests that melanocortin neuropeptides-specifically adrenocorticotropic hormone-offer a novel, steroidogenic-independent therapeutic modality for membranous nephropathy (MN). The molecular mechanism underlying this beneficial effect, however, remains largely elusive. To investigate whether melanocortins modulate humoral immunity, the authors induced passive Heymann nephritis, a model of human MN, in wild-type and melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) knockout rats and treated them with melanocortin agents. Additional rats received adoptive transfer of bone marrow-derived cells beforehand from wild-type or MC1R knockout rats. The findings indicate that MC1R signaling plays a key role in negative modulation of B-cell activation and thereby suppresses humoral immune responses in passive Heymann nephritis, and suggest that MC1R signaling might offer a novel B cell-targeted therapeutic strategy for MN.

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that the pituitary neuropeptide melanocortins-specifically, adrenocorticotropic hormone-offer a novel nonsteroidogenic therapeutic modality for membranous nephropathy (MN). However, the mechanism(s) of action remains elusive.

METHODS

To investigate whether melanocortins modulate humoral immunity, we induced passive Heymann nephritis (PHN), a model of MN, in wild-type (WT) and melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) knockout (KO) rats. We treated the animals with melanocortin agents-repository corticotropin injection, the nonsteroidogenic pan-melanocortin receptor agonist [Nle 4 , DPhe 7 ]-α-melanocyte stimulating hormone, the selective MC1R agonist MS05, vehicle gel, or phosphate-buffered saline-and evaluated kidney function, histology, and molecular changes. Additional rats received adoptive transfer of syngeneic bone marrow-derived cells beforehand from WT or MC1R KO rats.

RESULTS

KO of MC1R worsened PHN and this was associated with increased deposition of autologous immunoglobulin G (IgG) and complement C5b-9 in glomeruli and higher circulating levels of autologous IgG-evidence of a sensitized humoral immune response. Melanocortin therapy ameliorated PHN in WT rats, coinciding with reduced glomerular deposition of autologous IgG and C5b -9. The beneficial efficacy of melanocortins was blunted in KO rats but restored by adoptive transfer of syngeneic bone marrow-derived cells derived from WT rats. Mechanistically, MC1R was expressed in B lymphocytes and was negatively associated with B cell activation. MC1R agonism triggered the expression of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor in activated B cells in a cAMP-dependent mode and also repressed the expression of interferon regulatory factor 4 (a lymphoid transcription factor essential for B-cell development and maturation), resulting in suppressed plasma cell differentiation and IgG production.

CONCLUSIONS

MC1R signaling negatively modulates B cell activation and suppresses humoral immune responses in PHN, suggesting that MC1R signaling might offer a novel therapeutic target for MN.

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: An updated network meta-analysis

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of different pharmacological treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Thirty-four relevant studies were extracted from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and MEDLINE. Treatment with tacrolimus (TAC), cyclophosphamide (CTX), mycophenolate mofetil, chlorambucil (CHL), cyclosporin A (CSA), steroids, rituximab (RTX), and conservative therapy were compared. Outcomes were measured using remission rate and incidence of side effects. Summary estimates were expressed as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The quality of findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. In the direct meta-analysis for comparison of complete remission (CR) rate, the curative effect of RTX is inferior to CTX (OR 0.37; CI 0.18, 0.75). In the NMA of CR rate, the results showed that the curative effects of CTX, CHL, and TAC were significantly higher than those of the control group. The efficacy of RTX is not inferior to the CTX (OR 0.81; CI 0.32, 2.01), and the level of evidence was moderate; CSA was not as effective as RTX, and the difference was statistically significant with moderate evidence (OR 2.98, CI 1.00, 8.91). In summary, we recommend CTX and RTX as the first-line drug for IMN treatment.

C5b-9 Glomerular Deposits Are Associated With Poor Renal Survival in Membranous Nephropathy

Introduction

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the first cause of nephrotic syndrome in patients without diabetes. Its prognosis is variable, and treatment remains controversial because of potential toxicity. Currently, there is no reliable prognostic marker common to all etiologies of MN and routinely available to predict the disease course and guide therapeutic management. Despite the major role of complement in the glomerular damage of MN, its prognostic impact has never been studied. We investigated the frequency and prognostic impact of glomerular deposition of C5b-9 in MN.

Methods

We retrospectively selected adults diagnosed with MN (primary or secondary) at Montpellier University Hospital between December 2004 and December 2015. To be included, all patients were required to have complete medical data and a kidney tissue sample for further immunohistochemistry. We performed PLA2R1, C4d, and C5b-9 staining by immunohistochemistry.

Results

Sixty-four adults were included: 45 with primary MN and 19 with secondary MN. C4d was positive in the glomeruli of 61 adults (95.3%). Twenty-nine adults (45.3%) had glomerular deposition of C5b-9. Patients with glomerular deposition of C5b-9 had more severe nephrotic syndrome on diagnosis and lower remission and renal survival rates than adults without.

Conclusion

C5b-9 glomerular staining is a powerful and easily accessible tool for stratifying adults according to their renal prognosis. The efficacy of complement inhibitors should be tested in adults with glomerular deposition of C5b-9.

Pediatric membranous nephropathy: In the novel antigens era

Membranous nephropathy (MN) falls within the scope of a glomerular disease. MN exhibits subepithelial immune- complex deposition and capillary wall thickening which could occur in all age groups. In comparison with adult patients with MN, MN in pediatric population has a lower incidence and more secondary factors (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, infection, malignancy, or drug toxicity). Two target antigens for the immune complexes, PLA2R (identified in 2009) and THSD7A (in 2014), found in previous studies and first presented in adult MN, are found in pediatric patients suffering from MN and their antibodies are now an effective tool for diagnosis and monitoring in children and adolescents. Several novel antigens have been identified (e.g., EXT1/EXT2, NELL1, Sema3B, PCDH7, HTRA1, and NCAM1) over the past few years. Each of them represents different clinical and pathologic findings. In-depth research should be conducted to gain insights into the outcomes and pathophysiology of the above novel antigen-associated MN. Targeted treatment opinions for different novel antigen-related MN are under development both in adults and pediatric patients.

Efficacy and safety of 12 immunosuppressive agents for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults: A pairwise and network meta-analysis

Background: Immunosuppressants have been applied in the remedy of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) extensively. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants do not have final conclusion. Thus, a pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) was carried out to seek the most recommended therapeutic schedule for patients with IMN.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including cyclophosphamide (CTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus-combined mycophenolate mofetil (TAC + MMF), cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus (TAC), leflunomide (LEF), chlorambucil (CH), azathioprine (AZA), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), non-immunosuppressive therapies (CON), steroids (STE), mizoribine (MZB), and rituximab (RIT) for patients with IMN were checked. Risk ratios (RRs) and standard mean difference (SMD) were reckoned to assess dichotomous variable quantities and continuous variable quantities, respectively. Total remission (TR) and 24-h urine total protein (24-h UTP) were compared using pairwise and NMA. Then interventions were ranked on the basis of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results: Our study finally included 51 RCTs and 12 different immunosuppressants. Compared with the CON group, most regimens demonstrated better therapeutic effect in TR, with RR of 2.1 (95% CI) (1.5–2.9) for TAC, 1.9 (1.3–2.8) for RIT, 2.5 (1.2–5.2) for TAC + MMF, 1.9 (1.4–2.7) for CH, 1.8 (1.4–2.4) for CTX, 2.2 (1.0–4.7) for ACTH, 1.6 (1.2–2.1) for CsA, 1.6 (1.0–2.5) for LEF, and 1.6 (1.1–2.2) for MMF. In terms of 24-h UTP, TAC (SMD, −2.3 (95% CI −3.5 to −1.1)), CTX (SMD, −1.7 (95% CI −2.8 to −0.59)), RIT (SMD, −1.8 (95% CI −3.5 to −0.11)), CH (SMD, −2.4 (95% CI −4.3 to −0.49)), AZA (SMD, −−4.2 (95% CI −7.7 to −0.68)), and CsA (SMD, −1.7 (95% CI −3 to −0.49)) were significantly superior than the CON group. As for adverse effects (AEs), infections, nausea, emesia, myelosuppression, and glucose intolerance were the collective adverse events for most immunosuppressants.

Conclusion: This study indicates that TAC + MMF performed the best in terms of TR, and TAC shows the best effectiveness on 24-h UTP compared with other regimens. On the contrary, there seems to be little advantage on STE alone, LEF, AZA, and MZB in treating patients with IMN compared with CON.

Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021287013]

Immunosuppression therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: systematic review with network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes guidelines recommend rituximab or cyclophosphamide and steroids, or calcineurin inhibitor-based therapy. However, there have been few or no head-to-head comparisons of the relative efficacy and safety of different immunosuppression regimens. We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of available immunosuppression strategies compared to cyclophosphamide in adults with idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials in the treatment of adults with idiopathic membranous nephropathy. The primary outcome was complete remission. Secondary outcomes were kidney failure, partial remission, estimated glomerular filtration rate, doubling of serum creatinine, proteinuria, serious adverse events, discontinuation of treatment, serious infection and bone marrow suppression.

RESULTS

Cyclophosphamide had uncertain effects on inducing complete remission when compared to rituximab (OR 0.35, CI 0.10-1.24, low certainty evidence), mycophenolate mofetil (OR 1.81, CI 0.69-4.71, low certainty), calcineurin inhibitor (OR 1.26, CI 0.61-2.63, low certainty) or steroid monotherapy (OR 2.31, CI 0.62-8.52, low certainty). Cyclophosphamide had a higher probability of inducing complete remission when compared to calcineurin inhibitor plus rituximab (OR 4.45, CI 1.04-19.10, low certainty). Compared to other immunosuppression strategies, there was limited evidence that cyclophosphamide had different effects on other pre-specified outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The comparative effectiveness and safety of immunosuppression strategies compared to cyclophosphamide is uncertain in adults with idiopathic membranous nephropathy.

Therapies for Membranous Nephropathy: A Tale From the Old and New Millennia

Primary Membranous Nephropathy (PMN) is the most frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. If untreated, PMN can lead to end-stage renal disease; moreover, affected patients are at increased risk of complications typical of nephrotic syndrome such as fluid overload, deep vein thrombosis and infection. The association of PMN with HLA-DQA1 and the identification in around 70% of cases of circulating autoantibodies, mainly directed towards the phospholipase A2 receptor, supports the autoimmune nature of the disease. In patients not achieving spontaneous remission or in the ones with deteriorating kidney function and severe nephrotic syndrome, immunosuppression is required to increase the chances of achieving remission. The aim of this review is to discuss the evidence base for the different immunosuppressive regimens used for PMN in studies published so far; the manuscript also includes a section where the authors propose, based upon current evidence, their recommendations regarding immunosuppression in the disease, while highlighting the still significant knowledge gaps and uncertainties.

Revisiting immunological and clinical aspects of membranous nephropathy

Idiopathic or primary membranous nephropathy (IMN) is one of the most frequent causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults and the elderly. It is characterized by a thickening of the wall of the glomerular capillaries due to the presence of immune complex deposits. 85% of membranous nephropathy cases are classified as primary or idiopathic (IMN). The rest are of secondary origin (SMN), caused by autoimmune conditions or malignant tumors as lung cancer, colon and melanomas. It is an organ-specific autoimmune disease in which the complement system plays an important role with the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC; C5b-9), which produces an alteration of the podocyte structure. The antigen responsible for 70-80% of IMN is a podocyte protein called M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R). More recently, another podocyte antigen has been identified, the "Thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A" (THSD7A), which is responsible for 10% of the cases of negative IMN for anti- PLA2R.

Immunosuppressive treatment for primary membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. Without treatment, approximately 30% of patients will experience spontaneous remission and one third will have persistent proteinuria. Approximately one-third of patients progress toward end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within 10 years. Immunosuppressive treatment aims to protect kidney function and is recommended for patients who do not show improvement of proteinuria by supportive therapy, and for patients with severe nephrotic syndrome at presentation due to the high risk of developing ESKD. The efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressive regimens are unclear. This is an update of a Cochrane review, first published in 2004 and updated in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different immunosuppressive treatments for adult patients with PMN and nephrotic syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 1 April 2021 with support from the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating effects of immunosuppression in adults with PMN and nephrotic syndrome were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data synthesis were performed using Cochrane-recommended methods. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five studies (3807 patients) were included. Most studies exhibited a high risk of bias for the domains, blinding of study personnel, participants and outcome assessors, and most studies were judged unclear for randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment. Immunosuppressive treatment versus placebo/no treatment/non-immunosuppressive treatment In moderate certainty evidence, immunosuppressive treatment probably makes little or no difference to death, probably reduces the overall risk of ESKD (16 studies, 944 participants: RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99; I² = 22%), probably increases total remission (complete and partial) (6 studies, 879 participants: RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.97; I² = 73%) and complete remission (16 studies, 879 participants: RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.75; I² = 43%), and probably decreases the number with doubling of serum creatinine (SCr) (9 studies, 447 participants: RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.80; I² = 21%). However, immunosuppressive treatment may increase the number of patients relapsing after complete or partial remission (3 studies, 148 participants): RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.86; I² = 0%) and may lead to a greater number experiencing temporary or permanent discontinuation/hospitalisation due to adverse events (18 studies, 927 participants: RR 5.33, 95% CI 2.19 to 12.98; I² = 0%). Immunosuppressive treatment has uncertain effects on infection and malignancy. Oral alkylating agents with or without steroids versus placebo/no treatment/steroids Oral alkylating agents with or without steroids had uncertain effects on death but may reduce the overall risk of ESKD (9 studies, 537 participants: RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.74; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). Total (9 studies, 468 participants: RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.82; I² = 70%) and complete remission (8 studies, 432 participants: RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.33 to 3.38; I² = 37%) may increase, but had uncertain effects on the number of patients relapsing, and decreasing the number with doubling of SCr. Alkylating agents may be associated with a higher rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation or hospitalisation (8 studies 439 participants: RR 6.82, 95% CI 2.24 to 20.71; I² = 0%). Oral alkylating agents with or without steroids had uncertain effects on infection and malignancy. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) with or without steroids versus placebo/no treatment/supportive therapy/steroids We are uncertain whether CNI with or without steroids increased or decreased the risk of death or ESKD, increased or decreased total or complete remission, or reduced relapse after complete or partial remission (low to very low certainty evidence). CNI also had uncertain effects on decreasing the number with a doubling of SCr, temporary or permanent discontinuation or hospitalisation due to adverse events, infection, or malignancy. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) with or without steroids versus alkylating agents with or without steroids We are uncertain whether CNI with or without steroids increases or decreases the risk of death or ESKD. CNI with or without steroids may make little or no difference to total remission (10 studies, 538 participants: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.15; I² = 53%; moderate certainty evidence) or complete remission (10 studies, 538 participants: RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.56; I² = 56%; low certainty evidence). CNI with or without steroids may increase relapse after complete or partial remission. CNI with or without steroids had uncertain effects on SCr increase, adverse events, infection, and malignancy. Other immunosuppressive treatments Other interventions included azathioprine, mizoribine, adrenocorticotropic hormone, traditional Chinese medicines, and monoclonal antibodies such as rituximab. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on these treatments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated review strengthened the evidence that immunosuppressive therapy is probably superior to non-immunosuppressive therapy in inducing remission and reducing the number of patients that progress to ESKD. However, these benefits need to be balanced against the side effects of immunosuppressive drugs. The number of included studies with high-quality design was relatively small and most studies did not have adequate follow-up. Clinicians should inform their patients of the lack of high-quality evidence. An alkylating agent (cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil) combined with a corticosteroid regimen had short- and long-term benefits, but this was associated with a higher rate of adverse events. CNI (tacrolimus and cyclosporin) showed equivalency with alkylating agents however, the certainty of this evidence remains low. Novel immunosuppressive treatments with the biologic rituximab or use of adrenocorticotropic hormone require further investigation and validation in large and high-quality RCTs.

Membranous nephropathy: Treatment outline and risk stratification

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adult. However, the exact etiology and the best treatment approach are still unclear. It is imperative to understand the nature of and prognosis of MN before initiating treatment which may include disease specific therapy based on a careful risk-stratification approach.

The evolution of the therapeutic approach to membranous nephropathy

Primary membranous nephropathy (MN) is a frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults. In untreated patients, the outcome is variable, with one-third of the patients entering remission while the remaining ones show persisting proteinuria or progression to end-stage renal disease. Randomized clinical trials reported the efficacy of a 6-month regimen alternating intravenous and oral glucocorticoids with an alkylating agent every other month. The potential side effects of this regimen were limited by the fact that the use of glucocorticoids and alkylating agent did not exceed 3 months each. Two randomized trials with follow-ups (FU) up to 10 years provided assurance about the long-term efficacy and safety of this cyclical therapy. Calcineurin inhibitors have also been used successfully. However, in most responders, NS relapsed after the drug was withdrawn. Conflicting results have been reported with mycophenolate salts and adrenocorticotropic hormone. Observational studies reported good results with rituximab (RTX). Two controlled trials demonstrated the superiority of RTX over antiproteinuric therapy alone and cyclosporine. However, the FUs were relatively short and no randomized trial has been published against cyclical therapy. The available results, together with the discovery that most patients with MN have circulating antibodies against the phospholipase A2 receptor 1, support the use of cytotoxic drugs or RTX in MN. It is difficult to choose between these two different treatments. RTX is easier to use, but the FUs of the available studies are short, thus doubts remain about the long-term risk of relapses and the safety of repeated administrations of RTX.

Rituximab Treatment in a Patient with Kimura Disease and Membranous Nephropathy: Case Report

Kimura disease (KD) is a chronic, inflammatory disorder with slowly developing subcutaneous tumor-like swellings, often occurring in the head and neck region. KD is diagnosed based on histology, elevated levels of immunoglobulin type E, and increased peripheral eosinophil granulocytes. KD may coexist with glomerular renal diseases, and this case report is based on a patient with KD-associated membranous nephropathy. Patients with membranous nephropathy without KD have demonstrated responsiveness to treatment with monoclonal anti-CD20 antibodies. This case report is the first to investigate the effect of rituximab treatment in a patient with KD-associated membranous nephropathy. A 30-year-old Italian man living in Denmark was diagnosed with Kimura's disease based on subcutaneous nodules with eosinophil angiolymphoid hyperplasia. The patient was admitted to the hospital due to nephrotic syndrome. Serology showed eosinophil granulocytosis and negative PLA2-receptor antibody. Renal biopsy showed membranous nephropathy, and the patient was treated with systemic methylprednisolone followed by cyclosporin and then cyclophosphamide with only partial remission. Ultimately, treatment with intravenous rituximab was initiated, which resulted in overall remission and no nephrotic relapses at 30 months of follow-up. Thus, intravenous rituximab effectively decreased proteinuria and prevented nephrotic relapses in a patient with treatment-refractory membranous nephropathy due to KD.

Membranous nephropathy: diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring in the post-PLA2R era

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is an immune complex-mediated cause of the nephrotic syndrome that can occur in all age groups, from infants to the very elderly. However, nephrotic syndrome in children is more frequently caused by conditions such as minimal change disease or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and much less commonly by MN. While systemic conditions such as lupus or infections such as hepatitis B may more commonly be associated as secondary causes with MN in the younger population, primary or "idiopathic" MN has generally been considered a disease of adults. Autoantibodies both to the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) and to thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A (THSD7A), initially described in adult MN, have now been identified in children and adolescents with MN and serve as a useful diagnostic and monitoring tool in this younger population as well. Whereas definitive therapy for secondary forms of MN should be targeted at the underlying cause, immunosuppressive therapy is often necessary for primary disease. Rituximab has been successfully used in the treatment of MN, and is likely effective in children with MN as well, although dosing in the pediatric population is not well established. This review highlights the new findings in adult and pediatric MN since last reviewed in this journal.

How Does Herbal Medicine Treat Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy?

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) has made increasing progress in mechanism and treatment research. Herbal medicine is gradually being accepted as an alternative therapy in treating IMN. However, the intervention mechanism of herbal medicine in the treatment of membranous nephropathy is still unclear. In this review, we summarize some achievements of herb medicine in treating IMN and discuss the research direction of herb in IMN. Finally, we propose the dilemma about the study on the treatment of IMN with herb medicine. We hope that this article can bring some thoughts for clinical and scientific researchers on the treatment of IMN with herb medicine.

Association of diabetes with failure to achieve complete remission of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

PURPOSE

The association of type 2 diabetes with proteinuria remission and renal function decline in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains elusive. This study was designed to assess such association.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we included 656 IMN patients treated with immunosuppressants or plus corticosteroids, of whom 72 were diagnosed as type 2 diabetes prior to or at diagnosis of IMN. Data on age, sex, body mass index, presence of hypertension and diabetes, laboratory tests, and therapeutic regimens were retrospectively retrieved from medical record. Cox regression was used to analyze risks of failure to achieve remission, relapse, and developing a ≥ 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with baseline diabetes.

RESULTS

The patients were followed for 36.6 (IQR 17.5-59.0) months, of whom 451 reached complete remission, 92 achieved partial remission, and 61 developed a ≥ 30% eGFR decline or ESRD. IMN relapse occurred in 30.6% of the 543 remitted patients. Baseline diabetes was associated with failure to achieve complete remission (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.86, P = 0.005) in patients with IMN, independently of age, sex, hypertension, baseline serum albumin, urine protein levels, and eGFR, and therapeutic regimens. However, we failed to identify independent association between baseline diabetes and failure to achieve total remission (HR  0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.1, P = 0.29), IMN relapse (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.49-1.7, P = 0.80), or ≥ 30% decline in eGFR or ESRD (HR  1.4, 95% CI 0.78-2.7, P = 0.24) in patients with IMN.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline diabetes may be independently associated with failure to achieve complete remission, but not with IMN relapse and renal function decline in IMN patients.

Patients with Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: A Real-World Clinical and Economic Analysis of U.S. Claims Data

BACKGROUND

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome in nondiabetic adults. Approximately one third of patients with MN progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), while others may be successfully treated to remission. Patients with MN represent a high-risk population for whom management strategies can alter and improve outcomes. Currently, there is little real-world evidence regarding the burden of MN on health plans.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) characterize clinical and economic outcomes during a 1-year time frame among a prevalent cohort of patients with MN and (b) compare the 5% of patients incurring the highest cost with the remaining 95%.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of commercially insured patients was conducted using MarketScan administrative health care claims data from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2015. Patients were aged ≥ 18 years, enrolled In a fee-for-service plan, and had ≥ 2 medical claims for an MN diagnosis (ICD-9-CM codes 581.1, 582.1, and 583.1). Diagnoses indicating clear secondary causes were excluded wherever possible. Demographics were determined as of the first diagnosis date; clinical characteristics (e.g., MN-specific therapy, complications, and procedures), health care resource utilization (HCRU; inpatient, outpatient including other outpatient and emergency department [ED], and prescriptions), and costs were evaluated for 1 year following MN diagnosis. Total costs and cost distribution (2017 U.S. dollars) were examined using plan-paid and patient-paid amounts. The 95th percentile was used to categorize and compare the subcohorts: high-cost cohort (HCC) patients (top 5%) and non-high-cost cohort (NHCC) patients (the remaining 95%). Descriptive analyses, chi-square tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were conducted.

RESULTS

2,689 patients were identified (60.0% male, mean age = 46.4 years). Severity and advanced disease were observed In a higher proportion of HCC patients (n = 134) versus NHC patients (n = 2,555) via adverse health outcomes, procedures, and immunosuppressant use. HCC patients used significantly more resources on average than NHCC patients (additional use): 1.7 inpatient, 1.2 ED, and 4.8 outpatient office visits; 15 prescriptions; and 64.8 other outpatient visits (i.e., outpatient, hospital, and ESRD facilities). Total MN-related cost and mean (SD) cost per patient were $123.2 million and $45,814 ($101,353); HCC patients accounted for 43.7% of total costs for a mean cost per patient of $401,608 versus NHCC patients at 56.3% and mean cost per patient of $27,154. The greatest costs for both groups were related to outpatient visits (HCC = 46.7%; NHCC = 52.8%), inpatient visits (HCC = 27.7%; NHCC = 28.6%), and prescriptions (HCC = 25.7%; NHCC = 18.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MN are significantly burdened with high disease severity and adverse health outcomes, resulting In substantial HCRU and costs. Health plan cost drivers for MN (HCC and NHCC patients) occurred primarily In the outpatient setting, followed by the inpatient setting and prescriptions. Modifiable aspects preceding progression to advanced renal disease and worse outcomes should be explored to Identify effective interventions and improve resource allocation earlier In the disease pathway, before ESRD.

DISCLOSURES

This study was funded by Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. Kirkemo, Pavlova-Wolf, and Bartels-Peculis are employees and stockholders of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. Nazareth was an employee of Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals at the time of this study. Kariburyo, Xie, and Vaidya are employees of STATinMED Research, a paid consultant to Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals. Sim received an investigator-initiated research grant from Mallinkcrodt Pharmaceuticals. A portion of the study results were previously presented at the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) Kidney Week 2017; November 2, 2017; New Orleans, LA.

Primary membranous nephropathy: comprehensive review and historical perspective

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in non-diabetic Caucasian adults over 40 years of age. It has an estimated incidence of 8–10 cases per 1 million. Fifty per cent of patients diagnosed with primary MN continue to have nephrotic syndrome and 30% of patients may progress to end-stage renal disease over 10 years. Although it was recognised as a distinct clinic-pathological entity in 1940s by immunofluorescence and electron microscopy, the pathogenesis and treatment have become more apparent only in the last decade. Discovery of M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies and thrombospondin type 1 domain-containing 7A antibodies has given new perspectives in understanding the pathogenesis of the disease process. Anti-PLA2R antibody is the first serologic marker that has promising evidence to be used as a tool to prognosticate the course of the disease. More importantly, therapeutic agents such as rituximab and adrenocorticotropic hormone analogues are the newer therapeutic options that should be considered in the therapy of primary MN.

Comparative effectiveness and tolerance of immunosuppressive treatments for idiopathic membranous nephropathy: A network meta-analysis

Background

Immunosuppressive agents in general are shown to prevent renal progression and all-cause mortality in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) patients with nephrotic syndrome. However, the efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressive treatments have not been systematic assessed and compared. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare different immunosuppressive treatment in IMN.

Methods

Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and trial register system were searched for randomized controlled trials reporting the treatments for IMN to May 3, 2016. Composite endpoint of mortality or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), complete or partial proteinuria remission and withdrawal because of treatment adverse events were compared combing direct and indirect comparison using network meta-analysis. Ranking different immunosuppressive treatments in the outcomes were analyzed by using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results

Total 36 randomized controlled trials (n = 2018) covering 11 kinds of treatments were included. Compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment, only cyclophosphamide (CTX) and chlorambucil significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome of mortality or ESKD while combining the direct and indirect comparison (OR = 0.31, 95%CI: 0.12–0.81 and OR = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.12–0.92). CTX increased the composite outcome of complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) (OR = 4.29, 95%CI: 2.30–8.00) but chlorambucil did not (OR = 1.58, 95%CI: 0.80–3.12) as compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment. Chlorambucil also significantly increased the withdrawal risk (OR = 3.34, 95%CI: 1.37–8.17) as compared to CTX. Both tacrolimus (OR = 3.10, 95%CI: 1.36–7.09) and cyclosporine (CsA) (OR = 2.81, 95%CI: 1.08–7.32) also significantly increased the rate of CR or PR as compared with non-immunosuppressive treatment (without significant difference as compared with CTX), while ranking results showed that cyclosporine or tacrolimus was with less possibility of drug withdrawal as compared to CTX.

Conclusions

Cyclophosphamide and chlorambucil reduce risk of ESKD or death in IMN with nephrotic range proteinuria, but carry substantial toxicity that may be lower for cyclophosphamide. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine increase the possibility of proteinuria remission with less drug withdrawal, but the effects on kidney failure remain uncertain.

Treatment of primary membranous nephropathy: where are we now?

In the last 10 years, basic science and clinical research have made important contributions to the understanding and management of primary membranous nephropathy (MN). The identification of antibodies directed against the M-type phospholipase A₂ receptor (PLA2R) and thrombospondin type-1 domain-containing 7A protein have added a new perspective on diagnosis, monitoring the immunological activity, predicting prognosis and guiding therapy in patients with primary MN. Mounting evidence suggests that quantification and follow-up of antiPLA2R Abs levels can help in assessing prognosis and evaluate the response to treatment. The kidney disease improving global outcomes guidelines published in 2012 have not been updated. New data on the use of rituximab suggest it should be considered as a potential initial therapy in the treatment of patients with primary MN.

[Membranous nephropathy: New insights in therapeutic approach]

Membranous nephropathy is one of the leading causes of nephrotic syndrome in adults, evolving to 30 % end-stage renal disease after 10 years, in the absence of specific treatment. In 2009, the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R), a podocyte membrane glycoprotein, was identified as the first autoantigen involved in more than 70 % of primitive membranous nephropathy. Many studies have reported that high titers of PLA2R antibodies are correlated with a lower risk of spontaneous or immunosuppressant-induced remission, a higher risk of nephrotic syndrome and of progression to end-stage renal disease. Treatment is still challenging and controversial because of potential toxicity and lack of a reliable prognosis marker. In the past, the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines recommended immunosuppressive therapies as steroids and alkylating agents or cyclosporine in patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome or impaired renal function. Recent studies and one multicentric randomised controlled trial brought clear evidence to support the use of rituximab in these patients: rituximab regimen induces immunological and clinical remission in patients with membranous nephropathy, with a high safety profile. However, they have provided important data on the impact of PLA2R antibodies assessment as a prognostic biomarker in patients with membranous nephropathy. The next step will be the integration of this biomarker in KDIGO guidelines and the recommendation of rituximab as a first line immunosuppressive therapy in patient with persistent nephrotic syndrome due to membranous nephropathy.

Early initiation of immunosuppressive treatment in membranous nephropathy patients

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Suggestion for the management of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) includes 6 months of observation, followed with steroid plus alkylating agent. However, delayed immunosuppression exposes the kidneys to persistent damage. This study aimed to examine the benefit of early immunosuppression in IMN patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed. From 1993 to 2013, 161 IMN patients were enrolled. Patients receiving immunosuppression within 6 months after diagnosis were classified as initial-treatment group, whereas other patients as initial-no-treatment group. The clinical outcomes and complication were examined.

RESULT

Patients in the initial-treatment group had lower serum albumin concentration, less diabetes, and were younger. Steroid monotherapy is the main immunosuppression (64.5%) in this group. The initial-treatment group had a higher complete and partial remission rate than the initial-no-treatment group 6 months (52.9% vs. 35.0%, p=0.05) and 12 months (71.1% vs. 45.0%, p=0.003) after diagnosis. A similar result was seen between initial-steroid monotherapy and initial-no-treatment patients. Early immunosuppression is an independent predictor of remission within 1 year [hazard ratio (HR)=2.09; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.25-3.49; p=0.005] and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline over 50% during the follow-up. (HR=0.33; 95% CI=0.13-0.86; p=0.02). The initial-treatment group also had a low frequency of eGFR decline over 50% (p=0.001) and low combined end-stage renal disease/mortality (p=0.001) compared with the initial-no-treatment group, but without more immunosuppression-related complication.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to Western countries, early immunosuppression (even steroid monotherapy) in our patients is associated with better remission in the 1^st year and renal preserve. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the benefit of early immunosuppression in IMN patients, especially with oriental ethnic background.

[Membranous nephropathy: Diagnosis, new insights in pathophysiology, and therapeutic approach]

Membranous nephropathy (MN) accounts for about 20% of cases of nephrotic syndrome in the adult. Thickening of glomerular capillary walls results from subepithelial formation of immune deposits containing IgG and the membrane attack complex of complement, which is the major mediator of proteinuria, and antigens. Idiopathic forms of MN (IMN) represent 70 to 80% of all cases. A major breakthrough was the identification of the podocyte antigen PLA2R as the target of circulating antibodies in about 70% of IMN, which confirmed that the disease was auto-immune in nature. The optimal treatment of patients with IMN is still a matter of debate. Thirty to 40% of affected patients will undergo spontaneous remission, usually within one year from disease onset, whereas about one third will progress to end-stage kidney disease. Both the evidence that B cells play a key role in the pathogenesis of IMN and drug toxicity led to target B-cells with rituximab. Rituximab induced remission of nephrotic syndrome in 60 to 80% of the patients with long-lasting proteinuria despite blockade of the renin-angiotensin system and in patients who had previously failed other treatments. Because of the lack of randomized controlled trial (RCT) using rituximab and of high rate of spontaneous remission, a French non-blinded, parallel group RCT was performed to compare rituximab added to supportive therapy, to supportive therapy alone, in patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome.

Management of Membranous Nephropathy in Western Countries

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome (NS) in adults in Western countries. In 2012, the KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) working group published guidelines for the management of glomerulonephritis, thus providing a template for the treatment of this condition. While being aware of the impact of the clinicians' acumen and that patients may choose a different therapeutic option due to the risks of specific drugs and also of the evolving guidelines, this review details our approach to the management of patients with IMN in a Western center (Toronto).

SUMMARY

Based on studies published in Europe and North America, we included recent advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with membranous nephropathy similar to our practice population. We highlight the importance of establishing the idiopathic nature of this condition before initiating immunosuppressive therapy, which should include the screening for secondary causes, especially malignancy in the elderly population. The expected outcomes with and without treatment for patients with different risks of progression will be discussed to help guide clinicians in choosing the appropriate course of treatment. The role of conservative therapy as well as of established immunosuppressive treatment, such as the combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisone, and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), as well as of newer agents such as rituximab will be reviewed.

KEY MESSAGES

Appropriate assessment is required to exclude secondary conditions causing membranous glomerulonephritis. The role of antibodies to phospholipase A2 receptor (anti-PLA2R) in establishing the primary disease is growing, though more data are required. The increase in therapeutic options supports treatment individualization, taking into account the availability, benefits and risks, as well as patient preference.

FACTS FROM EAST AND WEST

(1) The prevalence of IMN is increasing worldwide, particularly in elderly patients, and has been reported in 20.0-36.8% of adult-onset NS cases. The presence of anti-PLA2R antibodies in serum or PLA2R on renal biopsy is the most predictive feature for the diagnosis of IMN and is used in both the East and West; however, appropriate screening to rule out secondary causes should still be performed. (2) Several observational (nonrandomized) Asian studies indicate a good response to corticosteroids alone in IMN patients, although no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been done in Asian membranous patients at high risk of progression. Corticosteroid monotherapy has failed in randomized controlled studies in Western countries and is therefore not recommended. (3) Cyclophosphamide is the most commonly prescribed alkylating agent in Europe and China. Also, chlorambucil is still used in some Western countries, particularly in Europe. In North America, CNIs are the more common first-line treatment. (4) Cyclosporine is predominantly used as monotherapy in North America, although KDIGO and Japanese guidelines still recommend a combination with low-dose corticosteroids. Clinical studies both in Asia and Europe showed no or little effects of monotherapy with mycophenolate mofetil compared to standard therapies. (5) There are encouraging data from nonrandomized Western studies for the use of rituximab and a few small studies using adrenocorticotropic hormone. Clinical trials are ongoing in North America to confirm these observations. These drugs are rarely used in Asia. (6) A Chinese study reported that 36% of IMN patients suffered from venous thromboembolism versus 7.3% in a North American study. Prophylactic anticoagulation therapy is usually added to IMN patients with a low risk of bleeding in both Eastern and Western countries. (7) The Chinese traditional medicine herb triptolide, which might have podocyte-protective properties, is used in China to treat IMN. An open-label, multicenter RCT showed that Shenqi, a mixture of 13 herbs, was superior to corticosteroids plus cyclophosphamide therapy to restore epidermal growth factor receptor in IMN patients, although proteinuria improvement was equal in the two groups. Importantly, Shenqi treatment induced no severe adverse events while standard therapy did.

Low-dose synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone-analog therapy for nephrotic patients: results from a single-center pilot study

INTRODUCTION

This report describes our experience using a low-dose synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) analog for patients affected by nephrotic syndrome who had not responded to or had relapsed after steroid and immunosuppressive treatments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eighteen adult nephrotic patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate >30 mL/min were recruited. Histological pictures included ten of membranous nephropathy, three of membranous proliferative glomerulonephritis, three of minimal change, and two of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis. All patients received the synthetic ACTH analog tetracosactide 1 mg intramuscularly once a week for 12 months. Estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, serum lipids, albumin, glucose, and potassium were determined before and during the treatment.

RESULTS

One of the 18 patients discontinued the treatment after 1 month because of severe fluid retention, and two patients were lost at follow-up. Complete remission occurred in six cases, while partial remission occurred in four cases (55.5% responder rate). With respect to baseline, after 12 months proteinuria had decreased from 7.24±0.92 to 2.03±0.65 g/day (P<0.0001), and serum albumin had increased from 2.89±0.14 to 3.66±0.18 g/dL (P<0.0001). Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol had decreased from 255±17 to 193±10 mg/dL (P=0.01), and from 168±18 to 114±7 mg/dL (P=0.03), respectively. No cases of severe worsening of renal function, hyperglycemia, or hypokalemia were observed, and no admissions for cardiovascular or infectious events were recorded.

CONCLUSION

Tetracosactide administration at the dosage of 1 mg intramuscularly per week for 12 months seems to be an acceptable alternative for nephrotic patients unresponsive or relapsing after steroid-immunosuppressive regimens. Further studies should be planned to assess the effect of this low-dose ACTH regimen also in nephrotic patients not eligible for kidney biopsy or immunosuppressive protocols.

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common form of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The disease shows a benign or indolent course in the majority of patients, with a rate of spontaneous complete or partial remission of nephrotic syndrome as high as 30% or more. Despite this, 30% to 40% of patients progress toward end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within five to 15 years. The efficacy and safety of immunosuppression for IMN with nephrotic syndrome are still controversial. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive treatments for adult patients with IMN and nephrotic syndrome. Moreover it was attempted to identify the best therapeutic regimen, when to start immunosuppression and whether the above therapies should be given to all adult patients at high risk of progression to ESKD or only restricted to those with impaired kidney function.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Renal Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Chinese databases, reference lists of articles, and clinical trial registries to June 2014. We also contacted principal investigators of some of the studies for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of immunosuppression in adults with IMN and nephrotic syndrome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and data synthesis were performed using the Cochrane-recommended methods. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty nine studies with 1825 patients were included, 36 of these could be included in our meta-analyses. The data from two studies could not be extracted and one study was terminated due to poor accrual. Immunosuppression significantly reduced all-cause mortality or risk of ESKD ((15 studies, 791 patients): RR 0.58 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.95, P = 0.03) and risk of ESKD ((15 studies, 791 patients): RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.95, P = 0.03), increased complete or partial remission ((16 studies, 864 patients): RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.70, P = 0.04), and decreased proteinuria ((9 studies,(393 patients): MD -0.95 g/24 h, 95% CI -1.81 to -0.09, P = 0.03) at the end of follow-up (range 6 to 120 months). However this regimen was associated with more discontinuations or hospitalisations ((16 studies, 880 studies): RR 5.35, 95% CI 2.19 to 13.02), P = 0.0002). Combined corticosteroids and alkylating agents significantly reduced death or risk of ESKD ((8 studies, 448 patients): RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.75, P = 0.002) and ESKD ((8 studies, 448 patients): RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.81, P = 0.008), increased complete or partial remission ((7 studies, 422 patients): RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.89, P = 0.004) and complete remission ((7 studies, 422 patients): RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.61 to 3.32, P < 0.00001), and decreased proteinuria ((6 studies, 279 patients): MD -1.25 g/24 h, 95% CI -1.93 to -0.57, P = 0.0003) at the end of follow-up (range 9 to 120 months). In a population with an assumed risk of death or ESKD of 181/1000 patients, this regimen would be expected to reduce the number of patients experiencing death or ESKD to 80/1000 patients (range 47 to 136). In a population with an assumed complete or partial remission of 408/1000 patients, this regimen would be expected to increase the number of patients experiencing complete or partial remission to 596/1000 patients (range 462 to 772). However this combined regimen was associated with a significantly higher risk of discontinuation or hospitalisation due to adverse effects ((4 studies, 303 patients): RR 4.20, 95% CI 1.15 to 15.32, P = 0.03). Whether this combined therapy should be indicated in all adult patients at high risk of progression to ESKD or only restricted to those with deteriorating kidney function still remained unclear. Cyclophosphamide was safer than chlorambucil ((3 studies, 147 patients): RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.90, P = 0.02). There was no clear evidence to support the use of either corticosteroid or alkylating agent monotherapy. Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil failed to show superiority over alkylating agents. Tacrolimus and adrenocorticotropic hormone significantly reduced proteinuria. The numbers of corresponding studies related to tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, adrenocorticotropic hormone, azathioprine, mizoribine, and Tripterygium wilfordii are still too sparse to draw final conclusions.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update, a combined alkylating agent and corticosteroid regimen had short- and long-term benefits on adult IMN with nephrotic syndrome. Among alkylating agents, cyclophosphamide was safer than chlorambucil. This regimen was significantly associated with more withdrawals or hospitalisations. It should be emphasised that the number of included studies with high-quality design was relatively small and most of included studies did not have adequate follow-up and enough power to assess the prespecified definite endpoints. Although a six-month course of alternating monthly cycles of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide was recommended by the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline 2012 as the initial therapy for adult IMN with nephrotic syndrome, clinicians should inform their patients of the lack of high-quality evidence for these benefits as well as the well-recognised adverse effects of this therapy. Cyclosporine or tacrolimus was recommended by the KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline 2012 as the alternative regimen for adult IMN with nephrotic syndrome; however, there was no evidence that calcineurin inhibitors could alter the combined outcome of death or ESKD.

Leflunomide plus oral prednisone in treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a retrospective clinical study of efficacy and safety

AIM

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) remains a controversial issue. While clinical trials have shown that some immunosuppressants combined with glucocorticoid have a good efficacy on IMN patients. However, there is little data on leflunomide (LEF) in treatment of IMN.

METHODS

Records of every patient with biopsy-proven IMN in Department of Nephrology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University from January 2005 to December 2011 (n=194) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with nephrotic IMN were treated with LEF plus oral prednisone (n=32) for at least 12 months, whereas 31 patients who did not receive any immunosuppressants were used as controls.

RESULTS

Remission rates in the LEF group were 31.3%, 59.4%, 68.8% and 71.9% at 6, 9, 12 and 15 months, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in controls. In the LEF group, proteinuria decreased from 6.79 g/24 h at baseline to 5.63 g/24 h (P<0.01), 3.85 g/24 h (P<0.01) and 2.51 g/24 h (P<0.01) after treatment for 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. Relapse occurred in five (21.7%) patients within a median of 14 months (range, 8-27) after cessation of LEF. No patients developed renal insufficiency during the therapeutic period. Multivariate analysis suggested that age negatively correlated with achievement of remission (odds ratio, 0.87; P<0.05). No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

LEF plus oral prednisone may be an alternative treatment option in Chinese patients with nephrotic IMN.

Glomerular diseases: membranous nephropathy--a modern view

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is an autoimmune disease usually associated with a nephrotic syndrome and it may progress to ESRD in the long term. Its etiology is often unknown (idiopathic MN), whereas other cases have a recognizable etiology (secondary MN). In idiopathic MN, the glomerular lesions are mainly caused by autoantibodies against a podocyte membrane protein, the M-type of phospholipase A2 receptor 1. The natural course of idiopathic MN is quite varied with spontaneous complete or partial remissions a relatively common occurrence. Patients with asymptomatic non-nephrotic proteinuria seldom progress and need only conservative management. Those with persistent full-blown nephrotic syndrome and those with declining renal function are candidates for specific treatment with any of several regimens. Cyclical therapy with alternating monthly intravenous and oral glucocorticoids combined with a cytotoxic agent can induce remission and preserve renal function in the long term. Cyclosporine or tacrolimus can induce remission, but relapses are frequent after the drug withdrawal. Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy seems to be ineffective, but may be beneficial when administered together with steroids. The experience with adrenocorticotropic hormone, natural or synthetic, is limited to a few studies with short-term follow-up, but high rates of remission can be seen after prolonged treatment. A high rate of remission and good tolerance have also been reported with rituximab. Patients with moderate renal insufficiency may also benefit from treatment, but at a price of frequent and serious side effects. With these limitations in mind, idiopathic MN may be considered a treatable disease in many patients.

Leveraging melanocortin pathways to treat glomerular diseases

The melanocortin system is a neuroimmunoendocrine hormone system that constitutes the fulcrum in the homeostatic control of a diverse array of physiological functions, including melanogenesis, inflammation, immunomodulation, adrenocortical steroidogenesis, hemodynamics, natriuresis, energy homeostasis, sexual function, and exocrine secretion. The kidney is a quintessential effector organ of the melanocortin hormone system with melanocortin receptors abundantly expressed by multiple kidney parenchymal cells, including podocytes, mesangial cells, glomerular endothelial cells, and renal tubular cells. Converging evidence unequivocally demonstrates that the melanocortin-based therapy using the melanocortin peptide adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is prominently effective in inducing remission of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome caused by various glomerular diseases, including membranous nephropathy, minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, suggesting a steroidogenic-independent mechanism. Mechanistically, ACTH and other synthetic melanocortin analogues possess potent proteinuria-reducing and renoprotective activities that could be attributable to direct protection of glomerular cells and systemic immunomodulation. Thus, leveraging melanocortin signaling pathways using ACTH or novel synthetic melanocortin analogues represents a promising and pragmatic therapeutic strategy for glomerular diseases. This review article introduces the biophysiology of the melanocortin hormone system with an emphasis on the kidney as a target organ, discusses the existing data on melanocortin therapy for glomerular diseases, and elucidates the potential mechanisms of action.

Glucocorticoids: complications to anticipate and prevent

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely used for inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Their mechanism of action is most commonly rooted in genomic effects that have both beneficial and adverse consequences. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential complications and side effects that may occur with GC use. Many of these complications are related to the dose and duration of therapy used. Evidence-based preventative strategies are discussed. Many recommendations are based on expert opinion and not on strong evidence. A 54-year-old man presents with proximal upper and lower extremity weakness. There are no rashes. The antinuclear antibody is negative; the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C reactive protein are 24 mm/h and 3 mg/dL, respectively. An electromyography displays myopathic motor unit potentials with fibrillation and a muscle biopsy confirms polymyositis. Prednisone of 60 mg/d is initiated. What are the risks associated with GC use? What other studies and interventions should occur in this patient starting long-term GC therapy?

Treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Immunosuppressive treatment of patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) is heavily debated. The controversy is mainly related to the toxicity of the therapy and the variable natural course of the disease-spontaneous remission occurs in 40-50% of patients. The 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis provides guidance for the treatment of iMN. The guideline suggests that immunosuppressive therapy should be restricted to patients with nephrotic syndrome and persistent proteinuria, deteriorating renal function or severe symptoms. Alkylating agents are the preferred therapy because of their proven efficacy in preventing end-stage renal disease. Calcineurin inhibitors can be used as an alternative although efficacy data on hard renal end points are limited. In this Review, we summarize the KDIGO guideline and address remaining areas of uncertainty. Better risk prediction is needed to identify patients who will benefit from immunosuppressive therapy, and the optimal timing and duration of this therapy is unknown because most of the randomized controlled trials were performed in low-risk or medium-risk patients. Alternative therapies, directed at B cells, are under study. The discovery of anti-M type phospholipase A2 receptor-antibodies is a major breakthrough and we envisage that in the near future, antibody-driven therapy will enable more individualized treatment of patients with iMN.

Stepwise treatment using corticosteroids alone and in combination with cyclosporine in korean patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy

PURPOSE

We undertook an observational study to investigate the effects of immunosuppressive treatment on proteinuria and renal function in 179 Korean idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients with nephrotic syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary outcome was regarded as the first appearance of remission and the secondary outcomes as a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >50% or initiation of dialysis, and all-cause mortality. Seventy-two (40.2%) and 50 (27.9%) patients were treated with corticosteroids alone (C) and corticosteroids plus cyclosporine (C+C), respectively, whereas 57 (31.8%) did not receive immunosuppressants (NTx). Cyclosporine was added if there was no reduction in proteinuria of >50% from baseline by corticosteroids alone within 3 months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in baseline renal function and the amount of proteinuria among the three groups. Overall, complete remission (CR) was achieved in 88 (72.1%) patients by immunosuppressants. In a multivariate analysis adjusted for covariates associated with adverse renal outcome, the probability of reaching CR was significantly higher in the C [hazard ratio (HR), 4.09; p<0.001] and C+C groups (HR, 2.57; p=0.003) than in the NTx group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that 5-year CR rates of C, C+C, and NTx groups were 88.5%, 86.2%, and 56.7% (p<0.001). Ten-year event-free rates for the secondary endpoints in these three groups were 91.7%, 79.9%, and 57.2% (p=0.01).

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppressive treatment was effective in inducing remission and preserving renal function in these patients. Therefore, stepwise treatment using corticosteroids alone and in combination with cyclosporine is warranted in these patients.

A case presenting with the possible relationship between myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis and membranous changes of the glomerular basement membrane

A 72-year-old woman exhibited elevated serum myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (MPO-ANCA) levels since 2006. Her serum creatinine (sCr) levels increased from 0.5 to 1.62 mg/dl in a stepwise pattern with proteinuria and hematuria up to January 2011. Renal biopsy indicated global sclerosis (14 %), fibrocellular crescents (28 %), and Swiss cheese-like appearance of the glomerular basement membrane (GBM) on light microscopy. IgG4 staining was negative. Immunofluorescent examination indicated granular staining with IgG and C3 along the GBM. MPO-ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis with membranous nephropathy (MN) was diagnosed. As chronic changes were relatively evident in the renal biopsy specimen without acute augmentation of renal function, immunosuppressive therapy was not administered. Thereafter, rapidly progressive renal dysfunction occurred (sCr, 3.67 mg/dl in May 2011) with proteinuria (~2 g/day), hematuria, and elevated serum MPO-ANCA levels. Therefore, a second renal biopsy was performed in May 2011, indicating global sclerosis (42 %) and cellular crescents (35 %) on light microscopy. Electron microscopy indicated electron-dense deposits in the GBM and mesangial lesions. Steroid therapy was subsequently initiated, and the patient's renal function partially improved. MPO-ANCA levels decreased to within normal limits and hematuria disappeared. MPO-ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis with MN is a rare dual glomerulopathy. However, complication should be considered when urinary protein appears in large amounts. Secondary MN was suspected due to the lack of IgG4 staining and distribution of electron-dense deposits to the mesangial lesion. Renal dysfunction occurring in a stepwise pattern may be attributed to intermittent augmentation in MPO-ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis.

Immunosuppression for membranous nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 36 clinical trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of immunosuppression for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) with nephrotic syndrome are still controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

The Cochrane Library, PUBMED, EMBASE, Chinese Database, and Clinical Trial Registries (June 2012) were searched to identify RCTs investigating the effect of immunosuppression on adults with IMN and nephrotic syndrome.

RESULTS

This review was an update (36 RCTs, 1762 participants) of the 2004 version (18 RCTs, 1025 participants). Immunosuppression significantly reduced all-cause mortality or ESRD (15 RCTs, 791 participants; risk ratio, 0.58 [95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.95]; P=0.03). However, the result was not consistent when prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken. Immunosuppression increased complete or partial remission (CR + PR) (16 RCTs, 864 participants; 1.31 [1.01-1.70]; P=0.04) but resulted in more withdrawals or hospitalizations (16 RCTs, 880 participants; 5.35 [2.19-13.02]; P=0.002). Corticosteroids combined with alkylating agents significantly reduced all-cause mortality or ESRD (8 RCTs, 448 participants; 0.44 [0.26-0.75]; P=0.002) and increased CR + PR (7 RCTs, 422 participants; 1.46 [1.13-1.89]; P=0.004) but led to more adverse events (4 RCTs, 303 participants; 4.20 [1.15-15.32]; P=0.03). Cyclophosphamide was safer than chlorambucil (3 RCTs, 147 participants; 0.48 [0.26-0.90]; P=0.02). Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil failed to show superiority over alkylating agents. Tacrolimus and adrenocorticotropic hormone significantly reduced proteinuria.

CONCLUSIONS

Alkylating agents plus corticosteroids had long-term and short-term benefits for adult IMN, but resulted in more withdrawals or hospitalizations.

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy: clinical and histologic prognostic features and treatment patterns over time at a tertiary referral center

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (i-MN) is a leading cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults and results in end-stage renal disease in approximately one third of patients. There are few large, long-term US studies evaluating clinical and histologic prognostic factors in i-MN.

METHODS

We describe 132 patients with biopsy-proven i-MN who were followed for a mean period of 68 months at our tertiary referral center from 1977 to 2009, and we analyzed clinical and histologic features that predicted renal outcomes.

RESULTS

The presence of hypertension and treating physician's decision to institute immunosuppression were negative predictors of attaining complete or partial remission. Among clinical variables, impaired renal function (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) at time of presentation was the only variable at presentation associated with an increased risk of reaching end-stage renal disease. The use of statins and RAAS blockers were protective. The choice of corticosteroids as the initial immunosuppressive agent by referring physicians decreased over time but even in the most recent era (2000-2008) was significant (33%).

CONCLUSION

Renal function at presentation and non-white race were the main predictors of a worse renal outcome. Corticosteroid therapy is still being adopted as first-line therapy in a significant number of patients in this era. The development of guidelines may help clarify the treatment strategies of i-MN.

Membranous nephropathy: the start of a paradigm shift

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary membranous nephropathy is a common glomerular disease characterized by sub-epithelial immune deposits that has become the prototype of an autoimmune glomerular disease. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent advances regarding the pathogenesis of membranous nephropathy as well as potential new therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The discovery of two major podocyte antigens, neutral endopeptidase (NEP), involved in rare cases of neonatal membranous nephropathy, and the M-type phospholipase A2 receptor 1 (PLA2R1), the first antigen discovered in adults, have been major 'breakthroughs' in our understanding of the pathogenesis of human membranous nephropathy. Anti-PLA2R antibodies appear to predict activity of the disease as well as response to therapy. Pediatric and adult cases of membranous nephropathy occurring in the presence of circulating cationic bovine serum album (BSA) and anti-BSA antibodies have also been described, raising the possibility that food antigens may be involved in the development of membranous nephropathy. Moreover, the results of genetic susceptibility have become available. Exciting progress has also been made in the treatment of this disease including therapy with adrenocorticotropic hormone and rituximab.

SUMMARY

Understanding disease pathogenesis is crucial in guiding patient evaluation and designing appropriate therapy. Recent discoveries have helped to elucidate the pathophysiology of membranous nephropathy and may facilitate a more patient-specific treatment approach in these patients.

Have we changed the outcome in membranous nephropathy? A propensity study on the role of immunosuppressive therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The long-term effect of immunosuppressive therapy (IS) on kidney survival in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (MGN) is debated. The introduction of renin angiotensin blockade, rigorous BP control, and the increasing age at presentation of patients with MGN adds further uncertainty. Given these important changes, we sought to determine whether implementation of IS has altered outcome.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 280 incident MGN patients from three distinct 10-year periods starting from 1975.

RESULTS

We found expected changes in treatment regimens but also variations in age, renal function, severity of proteinuria, and BP at presentation over this time. Outcomes did not differ over time if these significant variations in clinical characteristics were not accounted for across the eras. The effect of IS in the 57 patients treated with currently recommended regimens was assessed using propensity adjustment to address selection bias and the effect of newer, conservative therapies. A propensity score estimating the probability of receiving IS permitted the pairing of 39 treated patients with controls with similar high risk of progression of clinical features. Using this approach, IS was associated not only with remissions in proteinuria but also with substantially improved renal survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that patient presenting characteristics and management regimens have changed significantly over time and the natural history of MGN has been altered. A study of propensity-matched patients confirms that current recommendations for IS have improved outcomes in MGN patients at high risk of progression.

Primary antiphospholipid syndrome presenting as renal vein thrombosis and membranous nephropathy

Antiphospholipid syndrome is a multisystem auto-immune disorder characterized by thrombotic events and the presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies. Large vessel involvement in the form of thrombosis/stenosis and thrombotic microangiopathy is a commonly described renal finding. However, non-thrombotic glomerulopathies are increasingly being recognized in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. We report a rare occurrence of both renal vein thrombosis and membranous nephropathy in a previously healthy adolescent male. Investigations revealed persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies in the absence of an underlying systemic autoimmune disorder or malignancy. Our patient responded favourably to anti-proteinuric therapy and anticoagulation with complete resolution of proteinuria and a nearly occlusive thrombus.

Benefit and cost from the long-term use of cyclosporine-A in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

AIM

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults, is usually treated by cyclosporin A (CsA). Estimation of the effectiveness of long-term use of CsA in the remission and relapse rate of nephrotic syndrome along with histological changes in repeat renal biopsies was the aim of the study.

METHODS

Thirty-two nephrotic patients with well-preserved renal function treated by prednisolone and CsA were studied. A repeat biopsy was performed in 18 patients with remission of nephrotic syndrome, after 24 months of treatment, to estimate the activity of the disease and features of CsA toxicity.

RESULTS

Complete remission of nephrotic syndrome was observed in 18 (56%) and partial remission in 10 patients (31%) after 12 months of treatment (total 87%). Relapses were observed in 39% and 60% of patients with complete and partial remission, respectively, and multiple relapses in 25% of patients, who showed gradual unresponsiveness to CsA and decline of renal function. Progression of stage of the disease and more severe glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial injury were recognized in 55% and 61% of patients respectively. Features of CsA nephrotoxicity were not observed. The severity of histological changes was related to the time elapsed from the first biopsy (r = 0.452, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Low doses of CsA with prednisolone induce remission of nephrotic syndrome in most idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients. Although typical features of CsA nephrotoxicity are not observed, significant deterioration of histological lesions occurs with time, even in patients with remission. Long-term use of CsA should be examined with caution.