Rapid loss of vertebral mineral density after renal transplantation

The Challenge of Fractures in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVE

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of fractures in comparison to the non-CKD population, and fractures are associated with high mortality and worsening quality of life. However, the approach for evaluation of bone disease and fracture risk in CKD is different from the approach in the general population.

METHODS

The authors conducted a literature review of PubMed to include studies on pathophysiology of CKD mineral bone disorder, fracture risk assessment, and therapeutic options in the setting of CKD.

RESULTS

The higher risk observed in the CKD population is related to the complex interplay of changes in bone turnover (T), mineralization (M), and volume (V), along with other risk factors accumulated as glomerular filtration rate declines. The diagnosis of the type of renal osteodystrophy is not based only on assessment of bone density and traditional risk factors for osteoporosis. There are limitations of currently available fracture risk tools in the CKD population. Treatment choice should take into consideration the 3 components of the TMV classification along with the stage of kidney disease and comorbidities, but the assessment of these components has not been well established.

CONCLUSIONS

Current data are limited on efficacy and safety of treatments for fracture prevention in CKD. As new medications for the treatment of osteoporosis become available, there is an urgency to establish more clear guidelines for the diagnosis, fracture risk stratification, and treatment of bone disease in CKD.

Incidence, Prediction, and Prevention of Fractures After Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review Protocol

Background

Kidney transplant recipients are uniquely exposed to the disordered bone metabolism associated with chronic kidney disease beginning before transplantation followed by chronic corticosteroid use after transplantation. Previous efforts to synthesize the rapidly accruing evidence regarding estimation and management of fracture risk in kidney transplant recipients are outdated and incomplete.

Objective

To synthesize the evidence informing the overall incidence, patient-specific risk prediction, and methods of prevention of fractures in patient living with a kidney transplant.

Design

Three systematic reviews will address the following questions: What is the overall incidence of skeletal fracture after kidney transplantation (review 1)? Which prediction models and individual prognostic factors predict fracture in kidney transplant recipients (review 2)? and How effective are different antifracture interventions at preventing fracture or improving surrogate markers of bone health in kidney transplant recipients (review 3)?

Setting

Cohort studies (reviews 1 and 2) and randomized trials (review 2) with a mean/median follow-up ≥12 months beginning after transplant. Review 3: randomized trials or new-user cohort studies with concurrent controls evaluating the effect of antifracture interventions including bisphosphonates, calcium supplementation, cinacalcet, denosumab, parathyroid hormone analogues, parathyroidectomy, raloxifene, romosozumab, steroid withdrawal or minimization protocols after kidney transplant, vitamin D (both active and nutritional), other antifracture interventions.

Patients

Adult kidney transplant recipients in studies published after the year 2000.

Measurements

Review 1: incidence rate or cumulative risk of fracture. Review 2: For prediction models, measures of discrimination (eg, c-statistic), calibration (calibration curves, observed:expected ratios), and net benefit (ie, from decision curve analysis); for individual prognostic factors, relative measures of association with fractures. Review 3: measures of treatment effect on fractures and on surrogate markers of bone health (eg, bone mineral density, trabecular bone score).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library using subject headings and keywords related to kidney transplant and fractures. Pairs of reviewers will screen records independently in duplicate to identify studies relevant to one or more of the 3 reviews and categorize each study accordingly. Single reviewers will extract data and evaluate risk of bias for each included study using one of the following tools as appropriate: the Quality of Prognostic Studies tool, the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment tool, the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions tool, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. A second reviewer will independently verify. We will synthesize study-level summary estimates by random-effects meta-analysis for review 1, by vote counting and random-effects meta-analysis in review 2, and by random effects pairwise and, if feasible, network meta-analysis in review 3. We will summarize findings according to latest guidance of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group applicable to each review.

Limitations

Reliance on published studies is susceptible to publication bias, particularly in studies of prediction (review 2) and of treatment effects (review 3).

Conclusions

This review will provide an evidence update on 3 topics of relevance to patients, clinicians, guideline developers, and researchers.

Long-term skeletal, cephalometric, and volumetric changes in two Helsinki bimaxillary face transplant patients

Analysis of skeletal, cephalometric, and volumetric changes and occlusion during long-term follow-up was performed for two patients who underwent bimaxillary facial transplantation (FT). The study material consisted of the follow-up data of two bimaxillary composite FT performed in Helsinki University Hospital, one in 2016 and the other in 2018. Serial three-dimensional computed tomography scans obtained during follow-up (6 years for patient 1, 4 years for patient 2) were analyzed. The position of the maxilla remained stable in both patients. At 4 and 6 years, the changes in the anterior maxilla were ≤1 mm, while the anterior mandible had moved 2.6-4 mm anteriorly and the mandibular midline 0.4-3.7 mm to the left side. Patient 1 underwent re-osteosynthesis 4 months after transplantation due to mandibular non-union. Patient 2 had a sagittal mandibular osteotomy at 15 months after FT due to lateral crossbite and tension created by temporomandibular joint rotation. Thereafter both patients had a stable occlusion. A continuous bone volume reduction in the mandible was noticed in both patients (6% and 9% reduction of the transplanted volume). The volume of the transplanted maxilla decreased during the early postoperative period but increased back to the original transplanted volume during the follow-up.

Assessing Long-Term Adverse Outcomes in Older Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Early Steroid Withdrawal Versus Continuous Steroid Immunosuppression Using a Large Real-World Database

BACKGROUND

Steroids are widely used in maintenance immunosuppression treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Older individuals undergo age-related immunosenescence that consequently decreases their ability to process and evoke a response to foreign antigens. Thus, steroids may not be necessary in preventing allograft rejection and may consequently increase older recipients' risk of long-term steroid-related adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the adverse outcomes of long-term steroid immunosuppression in older kidney transplant recipients using real-world electronic medical record data.

METHODS

The TriNetX database "US Collaborative Network" was utilized to perform a propensity score-matched case-control study comparing 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year adverse effects of steroid immunosuppression in older adults (aged ≥ 65 years) kidney transplant recipients who underwent either an early-steroid withdrawal (ESW) maintenance regimen or a steroid continuous immunosuppression (SCI) regimen between 31 December, 2010 and 31 December, 2020. Early-steroid withdrawal was defined as tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil maintenance with no prednisone after the seventh day post-transplant. Steroid continuous immunosuppression was defined as tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil plus prednisone maintenance. Cohorts were matched on age, race/ethnicity, and risk factors for adverse steroid-related outcomes and rejection. Outcomes included post-transplant diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia osteoporosis/fractures, myocardial infarction, glaucoma/cataract, stroke, pulmonary embolism, and malignancy. Secondary outcomes analyzed incidences of infection-related outcomes, graft-related outcomes, and recipient mortality.

RESULTS

After matching, there were 304 recipients in each group (ESW, SCI). Mean age at the time of transplant was 69.2 ± 3.7 years (ESW) and 69.2 ± 3.4 years (SCI, p = 0.96). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed recipients who underwent SCI had increased incidences of post-transplant diabetes mellitus at 1 year (22.36% vs 30.37%, p = 0.01) and 3 years (34.89% vs 44.29%, p = 0.01), but this became non-significant at 5 years post-transplant (41.97% vs 42.6%, p = 0.34). Incidences of acute pancreatitis were higher for the SCI cohort at 3 years (p = 0.02) as well as incidences of acute myocardial infarction at 5 years post-kidney transplant (6.75% vs 14.39%, p < 0.01). No difference was found for other adverse outcomes. Early-steroid withdrawal recipients experienced significantly fewer infection-related outcomes, such as cytomegalovirus, BK virus, sepsis/bacteremia, and fungal infections, compared with SCI recipients. Last, recipients who underwent ESW experienced fewer incidences of rejection and death-censored graft failure at 5 years post-transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no standard maintenance immunosuppression protocol for older kidney transplant recipients. Death-censored graft survival, rejection, and patient survival were improved with ESW. Steroid minimization may be beneficial in this population given that it lowers the risk of drug-induced adverse effects.

Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) Technology for Bone Health Status Evaluation in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background: A significant loss in bone density and strength occurs during the post-renal-transplant period with higher susceptibility to fracture. The study aims to compare the performance of the Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) in the bone mineral density assessment with the conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Methods: A cohort of 40 patients underwent both DXA and REMS examinations on the lumbar spine and/or proximal femur. The paired t-test was used to compare DXA and REMS measurements; the chi-square test was used to compare the prevalence of osteoporosis/osteopenia. The agreement between the two techniques was assessed through Spearman's correlation. Results: As expected, most KTR patients were osteopenic or osteoporotic with both REMS and DXA (86.5% and 81% for the femur; 88% and 65% for the lumbar spine p < 0.05). A modest correlation (r = 0.4, p < 0.01) was observed at the lumbar spine between the T-score measured by REMS and DXA. A strong correlation was defined between REMS and DXA in the femoral region (r = 0.7, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The study demonstrates the exchangeability of the two techniques on the proximal femur in KTR and a higher diagnostic accuracy of REMS at the spine level than DXA.

The comprehensive incidence and risk factors of fracture in kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis

AIM

Kidney transplant recipients are at high risk of fracture due to many factors such as nutritional status, hyperparathyroidism, acidosis and steroid administration. The current meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively analyse the incidence and risk factors of fracture in kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A systematic search on Embase, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane Library until November 2023 was performed. RStudio software was used to analyse data.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight eligible studies containing 310 530 kidney transplant recipients were included in the analysis. The pooled incidence of fracture was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7%-13%) generally. When divided by regions, it was further observed that the pooled incidence of fracture was 13% (95% CI: 9%-17%) in Europe, 11% (95% CI: 6%-16%) in North America, 7% (95% CI: 3%-11%) in Asia. Regarding the risk factors, pooled analysis revealed that age of recipient (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.17-1.91), female sex (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.36-1.53), pretransplantation diabetes (HR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.58-1.97), pretransplantation fracture history (HR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.86-2.78), dialysis duration (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17) and deceased donor (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.39) related to higher risk of fracture. The general quality of included studies was acceptable, and no publication bias existed except for the analysis between age of recipient and fracture incidence; further trim and fill method indicated age of recipient showed a correlation trend with the fracture incidence without the statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The pooled incidence of fracture reaches 10% in kidney transplant recipients, which relates to age of recipient, female sex, pretransplantation diabetes or fracture history, dialysis duration and decease donor.

A cost-free approach to evaluating vertebral body bone density and height loss in lung transplant recipients using routine chest CT

BACKGROUND

To assess changes in bone density and vertebral body height of patients undergoing lung transplant surgery using computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

This institutional review board (IRB) approved retrospective observational study enrolled patients with a history of lung transplant who had at least two chest CT scans. Vertebral body bone density (superior, middle, and inferior sections) and height (anterior, middle, and posterior sections) were measured at T1-T12 at baseline and follow up CT scans. Changes in the mean bone density, mean vertebral height, vertebral compression ratio (VBCR), percentage of anterior height compression (PAHC), and percentage of middle height compression (PMHC) were calculated and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 93 participants with mean age of 58 ± 12.3 years were enrolled. The most common underlying disease that led to lung transplants was interstitial lung diseases (57 %). The inter-scan interval was 34.06 ± 24.8 months. There were significant changes (p-value < 0.05) in bone density at all levels from T3 to T12, with the greatest decline at the T10 level from 163.06 HU to 141.84 HU (p-value < 0.05). The average VBCR decreased from 96.91 to 96.15 (p-value < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Routine chest CT scans demonstrate a gradual decrease in vertebral body bone density over time in lung transplant recipients, along with evident anatomic changes such as vertebral body bone compression. This study shows that utilizing routine chest CT for lung transplant recipients can be regarded as a cost-free tool for assessing the vertebral body bone changes in these patients and potentially aiding in the prevention of complications related to osteoporosis.

Pretransplant Parathyroidectomy in Patients with Severe Secondary Hyperparathyroidism and Long-Term Effectiveness After Kidney Transplantation

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best option for patients with end-stage renal disease, but recipients still have legacy bone mineral disease from the pretransplant period, especially patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT). Patients who had severe sHPT and underwent KT were analyzed retrospectively. Two groups were identified (patients with severe sHPT who had parathyroidectomy or calcimimetic before KT). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the first year and last follow-up at the femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine using the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Persistent hyperparathyroidism (perHPT) incidence was significantly higher in the calcimimetic group (75% vs. 40%, p=0.007). In patients with parathyroidectomy, BMDs were higher at femoral neck (0.818±0.114 vs. 0.744±0.134, p=0.04) and lumbar spine (1.005±0.170 vs. 0.897±0.151, p=0.01) at the first assessment. The BMD comparison between patients treated with parathyroidectomy and calcimimetic found a significant difference only in the femoral neck at second evaluation (0.835±0.118 vs. 0.758±0.129; p=0.03). In multivariate, linear regression revealed a positive association between the last BMD of the femoral neck with body mass index (CC: 0.297, 95% CI, 0.002-0.017) and parathyroidectomy (CC: 0.319, 95% CI, 0.021-0.156). Parathyroidectomy is associated with a significantly better femoral neck BMD and a lower incidence of perHPT in patients with severe sHPT.

Bone health and fracture prevention after kidney transplantation

Changes in bone health and strength are common after kidney transplantation and can lead to an increased risk of fracture. This has implications for morbidity, mortality and renal allograft survival. This review will focus on the changes that occur in bone health and fracture risk after kidney transplantation and examine the evidence available to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions with the aim of fracture prevention.

The Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Systemic Effects Mediated by Parathormone in the Context of Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) stands as a prominent non-communicable ailment, significantly impacting life expectancy. Physiopathology stands mainly upon the triangle represented by parathormone-Vitamin D-Fibroblast Growth Factor-23. Parathormone (PTH), the key hormone in mineral homeostasis, is one of the less easily modifiable parameters in CKD; however, it stands as a significant marker for assessing the risk of complications. The updated "trade-off hypothesis" reveals that levels of PTH spike out of the normal range as early as stage G2 CKD, advancing it as a possible determinant of systemic damage. The present review aims to review the effects exhibited by PTH on several organs while linking the molecular mechanisms to the observed actions in the context of CKD. From a diagnostic perspective, PTH is the most reliable and accessible biochemical marker in CKD, but its trend bears a higher significance on a patient's prognosis rather than the absolute value. Classically, PTH acts in a dichotomous manner on bone tissue, maintaining a balance between formation and resorption. Under the uremic conditions of advanced CKD, the altered intestinal microbiota majorly tips the balance towards bone lysis. Probiotic treatment has proven reliable in animal models, but in humans, data are limited. Regarding bone status, persistently high levels of PTH determine a reduction in mineral density and a concurrent increase in fracture risk. Pharmacological manipulation of serum PTH requires appropriate patient selection and monitoring since dangerously low levels of PTH may completely inhibit bone turnover. Moreover, the altered mineral balance extends to the cardiovascular system, promoting vascular calcifications. Lastly, the involvement of PTH in the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone axis highlights the importance of opting for the appropriate pharmacological agent should hypertension develop.

Associations of Changes in Bone Turnover Markers with Change in Bone Mineral Density in Kidney Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Bone loss after kidney transplantation is highly variable. We investigated whether changes in bone turnover markers associate with bone loss during the first post-transplant year.

METHODS

Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at 0 and 12 months, with biointact parathyroid hormone, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), intact procollagen type I N -terminal propeptide (PINP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRAP5b) measured at 0, 3, and 12 months post-transplant ( N =209). Paired transiliac bone biopsies were available in a subset ( n =49). Between-group differences were evaluated by Student's t test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, or Pearson's chi-squared test.

RESULTS

Changes in BMD varied from -22% to +17%/yr. Compared with patients with no change (±2.5%/yr), patients who gained BMD had higher levels of parathyroid hormone (236 versus 136 pg/ml), BALP (31.7 versus 18.8 μ g/L), and Intact PINP (121.9 versus 70.4 μ g/L) at time of transplantation; a greater decrease in BALP (-40% versus -21%) and Intact PINP (-43% versus -13%) by 3 months; and lower levels of Intact PINP (36.3 versus 60.0 μ g/L) at 12 months post-transplant. Patients who lost BMD had a less marked decrease, or even increase, in Intact PINP (+22% versus -13%) and TRAP5b (-27% versus -43%) at 3 months and higher Intact PINP (83.7 versus 60.0 μ g/L) and TRAP5b (3.89 versus 3.16 U/L) at 12 months compared with patients with no change. If none of the biomarkers decreased by the least significant change at 3 months, an almost two-fold (69% versus 36%) higher occurrence of bone loss was seen at 12 months post-transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone loss after kidney transplantation was highly variable. Resolution of high bone turnover, as reflected by decreasing bone turnover markers, associated with BMD gain, while increasing bone turnover markers associated with bone loss.

Bone Loss after Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review of Organ-Specific Considerations

This review article investigates solid organ transplantation-induced osteoporosis, a critical yet often overlooked issue, emphasizing its significance in post-transplant care. The initial sections provide a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence and multifactorial pathogenesis of transplantation osteoporosis, including factors such as deteriorating post-transplantation health, hormonal changes, and the impact of immunosuppressive medications. Furthermore, the review is dedicated to organ-specific considerations in transplantation osteoporosis, with separate analyses for kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantations. Each section elucidates the unique challenges and management strategies pertinent to transplantation osteoporosis in relation to each organ type, highlighting the necessity of an organ-specific approach to fully understand the diverse manifestations and implications of transplantation osteoporosis. This review underscores the importance of this topic in transplant medicine, aiming to enhance awareness and knowledge among clinicians and researchers. By comprehensively examining transplantation osteoporosis, this study contributes to the development of improved management and care strategies, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes in this vulnerable group. This detailed review serves as an essential resource for those involved in the complex multidisciplinary care of transplant recipients.

Potential Role of Bone Metabolism Markers in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The impact of treatments, suppressing the immune system, persistent hyperparathyroidism, and other risk factors on mineral and bone disorder (MBD) after kidney transplantation is well-known. However, there is limited knowledge about their effect on bone metabolism biomarkers. This study aimed to investigate the influence of kidney transplant on these markers, comparing them to patients undergoing hemodialysis and healthy individuals.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, three groups were included: kidney transplant patients (n = 57), hemodialysis patients (n = 26), and healthy controls (n = 31). Plasma concentrations of various bone metabolism biomarkers, including Dickkopf-related protein 1, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin, osteopontin, sclerostin, and fibroblast growth factor 23, were measured. Associations between these biomarkers and clinical and laboratory data were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients participated. Transplant recipients had significantly lower levels of Dickkopf-related protein 1, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin, osteopontin, sclerostin, and fibroblast growth factor 23 compared to hemodialysis patients. Alkaline phosphatase levels positively correlated with osteopontin (r = 0.572, p < 0.001), while fibroblast growth factor 23 negatively correlated with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (r = -0.531, p = 0.019). The panel of bone biomarkers successfully predicted hypercalcemia (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.852, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.679-1.000) and dyslipidemia (AUC = 0.811, 95% CI 0.640-0.982) in transplant recipients.

CONCLUSION

Kidney transplantation significantly improves mineral and bone disorders associated with end-stage kidney disease by modulating MBD markers and reducing bone metabolism markers, such as Dickkopf-related protein 1, osteoprotegerin, osteocalcin, osteopontin, and sclerostin. Moreover, the panel of bone biomarkers effectively predicted hypercalcemia and dyslipidemia in transplant recipients.

Trabecular Bone Score Improves Early After Successful Kidney Transplantation Irrespective of Antiresorptive Therapy and Changes in Bone Mineral Density

Background

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a new tool to assess trabecular bone microarchitecture based on standard dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of lumbar spine images. TBS may be important to assess bone quality and fracture susceptibility in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). This study aimed to investigate the effect of different bone therapies on TBS in KTRs.

Methods

We reanalyzed DXA scans to assess TBS in 121 de novo KTRs at baseline, 10 wk, and 1 y. This cohort, between 2007 and 2009, participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the effect of ibandronate versus placebo in addition to vitamin D and calcium.

Results

Although bone mineral density (BMD) Z scores showed a subtle decrease in the first weeks, TBS Z scores increased from baseline to 10 wk for both treatment groups, followed by a slight decline at 12 mo. When comparing treatment groups and adjusting for baseline TBS, there were no differences found in TBS at 12 mo (P = 0.419). Correlation between TBS and BMD at baseline was weak (Spearman's ρ = 0.234, P = 0.010), and change in TBS was not correlated with changes in lumbar spine BMD in either of the groups (ρ = 0.003, P = 0.973).

Conclusions

Treatment with ibandronate or vitamin D and calcium did not affect bone quality as measured by TBS in de novo KTRs, but TBS increased early, irrespective of intervention. Changes in TBS and BMD during the study period were not correlated, indicating that these measurements reflect different aspects of bone integrity. TBS may complement BMD assessment in identifying KTRs with a high fracture risk.

The effect of zoledronic acid on hip geometry in renal transplant recipients: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study

BACKGROUND

In renal transplant patients, bisphosphonates may prevent bone loss, but little is known about their effects on bone microarchitecture and geometrical hip parameters, as the key factors of bone stability. This study aimed to analyze the effect of zoledronic acid on the mentioned parameters in kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized trial, 33 patients were followed for six months after administering either 4mg of zoledronic acid or a placebo. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the spine, hip, radius, and whole body was obtained, and trabecular bone score (TBS) was evaluated using the software. Geometric assessment at the proximal femur was performed by the HSA program.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients in the intervention group and 15 in the control group completed the study. The mean percentages of the changes in the BMD at the lumbar spine and whole body were significantly different between the placebo and intervention groups (-0.23% vs. 4.91% and -2.03% vs. 1.23%) (P < 0.05). Zoledronic acid appeared to enhance the subperiosteal diameter, endocortical diameter, and cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) at the narrow neck in comparison with placebo (P < 0.05); however, no difference in TBS was observed between both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that a single administration of zoledronic acid might ameliorate bone loss at the lumbar spine and the whole body and maintain the subperiosteal diameter, endocortical diameter, and CSMI as parameters of bone strength at the narrow neck of the proximal femur after six months in renal-transplant recipients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in IRCT (ID: IRCT20181202041821N1) on 04-05-2019.

Risk Factors for Fractures in Renal Transplantation: A Population-Based Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk of fractures, and targeted preventive strategies are needed. Therefore, in this retrospective cohort study, we investigated a large population-based cohort to identify the transplant recipient-specific risk factors for fractures in Taiwanese kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients who underwent renal transplantation between 2003 and 2015 were identified and followed until December 31, 2015, to observe the development of fractures. Variables associated with the development of post-transplant fractures were identified by calculating hazard ratios in a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

5,309 renal transplant recipients were identified, of whom 553 (10.4%) were diagnosed with post-transplant fractures. Independent predictors of post-transplant fractures included an age at transplant ≥65 years (p < 0.001), female sex (p < 0.001), fractures within 3 years prior to transplantation (p < 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001). In addition, daily prednisolone doses >2.9–5.3 mg/day (p < 0.001), >5.3–8.7 mg/day (p < 0.001), and >8.7 mg/day (p < 0.001) were also independent predictors of post-transplant fractures. Conversely, the use of peritoneal dialysis before renal transplantation (p = 0.021), hypertension (p = 0.005), and the use of tacrolimus (p < 0.001), azathioprine (p = 0.006), mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid (p = 0.002), mTOR inhibitors (p = 0.004), and calcium supplements (p = 0.009) were inversely correlated with post-transplant fractures.

CONCLUSION

We recommend minimizing daily glucocorticoids as early and as far as possible in conjunction with immunosuppressive regimens such as tacrolimus, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid, mTOR inhibitors, and calcium supplements, especially in older female recipients and in recipients with diabetes and a history of prior fractures.

Relation of testosterone level and other factors with bone mineral density in male kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Although testosterone has a pivotal role in bone health, its correlation with bone mineral density (BMD) is understudied in kidney transplant recipients who are at high risk of osteoporosis. This study aimed to elucidate if there is any correlation between serum free testosterone and BMD in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty male kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study, and they were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, and laboratory investigations (including total and free testosterone). BMD was assessed in three regions (forearm, hip, and lumbar spine) using DEXA scan.

RESULTS

The mean age of the included patients was 45.55 ± 13.58 years. Serum total and free testosterone had mean values of 5.17 ± 1.4 ng/ml and 95.46 ± 28.24 pg/ml, respectively, with all levels within the normal range. DEXA scan detected osteoporosis and osteopenia in 9 (15%) and 30 (50%) patients in the lumbar region, 3 (5%) and 36 (60%) in the hip region, as well as 21 (35%) and 33 (55%) in the forearm region, respectively. BMD of the lumbar region had a significant positive correlation with free testosterone, phosphorus, and eGFR, while it had a significant negative correlation with platelets and patient age. BMD of the hip region was positively correlated with serum phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and duration since the transplant, whereas it was negatively correlated with platelets and total testosterone level. BMD of the forearm had a significant positive correlation with eGFR, whereas it had a significant negative correlation with age and duration since transplantation. In addition, forearm BMD was significantly lower in patients with a radiocephalic AVF.

CONCLUSION

Even within the normal range, free testosterone has a significant positive correlation with lumbar spine BMD with no significant association with the forearm or hip BMD.

Coexistence of Low Muscle Mass and Osteoporosis as a Predictor of Fragility Fractures in Long-Term Kidney Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia and osteoporosis are highly prevalent among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Although osteoporosis is known to increase fracture risk in KTRs, it is unclear whether sarcopenia or osteosarcopenia is associated with this increased risk. Thus, we aimed to investigate the association of the coexistence of low muscle mass (LMM) and osteoporosis with the risk of fracture in long-term KTRs.

METHODS

Exactly 342 stable KTRs underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) measurement using bioelectrical impedance analysis.

RESULTS

LMM and osteoporosis were observed in 109 (31.9%) and 93 patients (27.2%), respectively. During a follow-up period of 5.1 years, 48 (14.0%) fractures occurred. KTRs with LMM had a higher fracture risk, but this was not significant (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-3.50, p = 0.073). Similar results were obtained in KTRs with osteoporosis (aHR 1.84, 95% CI 0.96-3.47, p = 0.063). We divided the KTRs into four groups according to the presence of LMM and/or osteoporosis. The cumulative incidence rates of fractures were 13.0%, 11.1%, 10.5%, and 31.3% in the KTRs without both LMM and osteoporosis, those with LMM alone, those with osteoporosis alone, and those with both, respectively. The KTRs with both LMM and osteoporosis had a 2.92fold higher risk of fractures (95% CI 1.29-6.49; p = 0.010) than those without both LMM and osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

Long-term KTRs with the coexistence of LMM and osteoporosis had an independently higher risk of fragility fractures than those without both LMM and osteoporosis. The combination of SMI and osteoporosis definitions can be used to identify KTRs with a high fracture risk.

Urinary collagen peptides: Source of markers for bone metabolic processes in kidney transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an increased risk of fractures. Total urinary hydroxyproline excretion served as marker for bone resorption (BR) but was replaced by β-CrossLaps (CTX), a C-terminal collagen α-1(I) chain (COL1A1) telopeptide. We investigated the low-molecular-weight urinary proteome for peptides associated with changes in bone metabolism after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data including serum levels of CTX in 96 KTR from two nephrology centers were correlated with signal intensities of urinary peptides identified by capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Eighty-two urinary peptides were significantly correlated with serum CTX levels. COL1A1 was the predominant peptide source. Oral bisphosphonates were administered for decreased bone density in an independent group of 11 KTR and their effect was evaluated on the aforementioned peptides. Study of the peptides cleavage sites revealed a signature of Cathepsin K and MMP9. Seventeen of these peptides were significantly associated with bisphosphonate treatment, all showing a marked reduction in their excretion levels compared to baseline.

DISCUSSION

This study provides strong evidence for the presence of collagen peptides in the urine of KTR that are associated with BR and that are sensitive to bisphosphonate treatment. Their assessment might become a valuable tool to monitor bone status in KTR.

Bone Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) comprises alterations in calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone (PTH), Vitamin D, and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) metabolism, abnormalities in bone turnover, mineralization, volume, linear growth or strength, and vascular calcification leading to an increase in bone fractures and vascular disease, which ultimately result in high morbidity and mortality. The bone component of CKD-MBD, referred to as renal osteodystrophy, starts early during the course of CKD as a result of the effects of progressive reduction in kidney function which modify the tight interaction between mineral, hormonal, and other biochemical mediators of cell function that ultimately lead to bone disease. In addition, other factors, such as osteoporosis not apparently dependent on the typical pathophysiologic abnormalities resulting from altered kidney function, may accompany the different varieties of renal osteodystrophy leading to an increment in the risk of bone fracture. After kidney transplantation, these bone alterations and others directly associated or not with changes in kidney function may persist, progress or transform into a different entity due to new pathogenetic mechanisms. With time, these alterations may improve or worsen depending to a large extent on the restoration of kidney function and correction of the metabolic abnormalities developed during the course of CKD. In this paper, we review the bone lesions that occur during both CKD progression and after kidney transplant and analyze the factors involved in their pathogenesis as a means to raise awareness of their complexity and interrelationship.

Systematic Review of the Treatment of Persistent Hyperparathyroidism Following Kidney Transplantation

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder is one of the complications associated with chronic kidney disease. About 10-50% of patients following kidney transplantation have persistent hyperparathyroidism. Hypercalcaemic hyperparathyroidism has a negative impact on the kidney transplant outcome; therefore, it requires treatment. The data regarding the treatment of persistent hyperparathyroidism provided in scientific publications are divergent and contradictory. Therefore, the aim of our systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of persistent hyperparathyroidism treatment in patients following kidney transplantation. The Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were browsed independently by two authors. The search strategy included controlled vocabulary and keywords. The effectiveness of calcitriol, paricalcitol, cinacalcet, and parathyroidectomy was compared and analysed. The mean calcium and parathormone (PTH) concentrations per patient in the group of paricalcitol increased by 1.27% and decreased by 35.14% (n = 248); in the group of cinacalcet decreased by 12.09% and 32.16% (n = 368); and in the group of parathyroidectomy decreased by 19.06% and 86.49% (n = 15) at the end of the study compared to the baseline (n = 244, n = 342 and n = 15), respectively. Paricalcitol, cinacalcet, and parathyroidectomy decreased the intact PTH level. Cinacalcet and parathyroidectomy lowered calcium levels in renal transplant patients with hypercalcaemia. Conversely, paricalcitol increased the serum calcium concentration. Cinacalcet seems to be a good candidate in the treatment of post-transplant hyperparathyroidism.

Maxillary and Mandibular Healing After Facial Allotransplantation

INTRODUCTION

Facial transplantation has emerged as a viable option in treating devastating facial injuries.Despite the high healing rate of Le Fort III and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) in nontransplant patients, few studies have reported assessment of maxillary and mandibular healing in face transplant patients compared with nontransplant patients. The aim of this study was to examine differences in bone healing in our patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of facial allotransplantation patients at the Cleveland Clinic from December 2008 to inception. Demographics such as age, date of birth, and sex were recorded. Additional variables included procedures, revisions, reoperations, medications, and bone stability and healing. Computed tomography (CT) images assessed the alignment of skeletal components, bony union quality, and stability of fixation.

RESULTS

Three patients were included: 2 had Le Fort III segment transplantation, and 1 had transplantation of both a Le Fort III segment and mandibular BSSO. The Le Fort III segment in all patients exhibited mobility and fibrous union at the Le Fort III osteotomy on CT. In contrast, the BSSO healed uneventfully after transplantation and revision surgery, with bony union confirmed by both CT and histology of the fixation area between the donor and recipient mandible bilaterally. No patients with midfacial fibrous union required revision of the nonunion as they were clinically asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Le Fort osteotomy demonstrates inferior healing in facial transplantation compared with the nontransplant population. In contrast, the successful healing in the mandible is likely owing to the high density of rich cancellous bone.

Metabolic acidosis post kidney transplantation

Metabolic acidosis, a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), results in a multitude of deleterious effects. Though the restoration of kidney function following transplantation is generally accompanied by a correction of metabolic acidosis, a subset of transplant recipients remains afflicted by this ailment and its subsequent morbidities. The vulnerability of kidney allografts to metabolic acidosis can be attributed to reasons similar to pathogenesis of acidosis in non-transplant CKD, and to transplant specific causes, including donor related, recipient related, immune mediated factors, and immunosuppressive medications. Correction of metabolic acidosis in kidney transplantation either with alkali therapy or through dietary manipulations may have potential benefits and the results of such clinical trials are eagerly awaited. This review summarizes the published evidence on the pathogenesis and clinical consequences of chronic metabolic acidosis in kidney transplant recipients.

Kidney Transplantation, Immunosuppression and the Risk of Fracture: Clinical and Economic Implications

Rationale & Objective

Disorders of bone and mineral metabolism frequently develop with advanced kidney disease, may be exacerbated by immunosuppression after kidney transplantation, and increase the risk of fractures.

Study Design

Retrospective database study.

Setting & Participants

Kidney-only transplant recipients aged ≥18 years from 2005 to 2016 in the United States captured in US Renal Data System records, which integrate Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing records with Medicare billing claims.

Exposures

Various immunosuppression regimens in the first 3 months after kidney transplantation.

Outcomes

The development of fractures, as ascertained using diagnostic codes on Medicare billing claims.

Analytical Approach

We used multivariable Cox regression with inverse propensity weighting to compare the incidence of fractures >3 months-to-3 years after kidney transplantation associated with various immunosuppression regimens compared to a reference regimen of antithymocyte globulin (TMG) or alemtuzumab (ALEM) with tacrolimus + mycophenolic acid + prednisone using inverse probability treatment weighting.

Results

Overall, fractures were identified in 7.5% of kidney transplant recipients (women, 8.8%; men, 6.7%; age < 55 years, 5.9%; age ≥ 55 years, 9.3%). In time-varying regression, experiencing a fracture was associated with a substantially increased risk of subsequent death within 3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.45-3.81). Fractures were also associated with increased Medicare spending (first year: $5,122; second year: $10,890; third year: $11,083; [P < 0.001]). Induction with TMG or ALEM and the avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids significantly reduced the risk of fractures in younger (aHR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.73) and older (aHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.94) patients. The avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids with any induction was associated with a reduced risk of fractures in women.

Limitations

This was a retrospective study which lacked data on immunosuppression levels.

Conclusions

Fractures after kidney transplantation are associated with significantly increased mortality risk and costs. The early avoidance or early withdrawal of steroids after induction with TMG or ALEM reduces the risk of fractures after kidney transplantation and should be considered for patients at high-risk of this complication, including older adults and women.

The Role of Alterations in Alpha-Klotho and FGF-23 in Kidney Transplantation and Kidney Donation

Cardiovascular disease and mineral bone disorders are major contributors to morbidity and mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease and often persist after renal transplantation. Ongoing hormonal imbalances after kidney transplant (KT) are associated with loss of graft function and poor outcomes. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) and its co-receptor, α-Klotho, are key factors in the underlying mechanisms that integrate accelerated atherosclerosis, vascular calcification, mineral disorders, and osteodystrophy. On the other hand, kidney donation is also associated with endocrine and metabolic adaptations that include transient increases in circulating FGF-23 and decreases in α-Klotho levels. However, the long-term impact of these alterations and their clinical relevance have not yet been determined. This manuscript aims to review and summarize current data on the role of FGF-23 and α-Klotho in the endocrine response to KT and living kidney donation, and importantly, underscore specific areas of research that may enhance diagnostics and therapeutics in the growing population of KT recipients and kidney donors.

Clinical predictors of incipient vertebral fractures and bone mineral density in kidney transplant patients

PURPOSE

Kidney transplant recipients are prone to metabolic bone diseases and consequent fractures. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of incipient vertebral fractures, osteopenia, osteoporosis, and the clinical factors associated with incipient vertebral fractures in a group of kidney transplant patients.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-four patients (F/M 124/140, 45.3 ± 13 years) who had undergone kidney transplantation in tertiary care centers were included. Vertebral fractures were assessed semiquantitatively using conventional thoracolumbar lateral radiography in 202 of the patients.

RESULTS

Vertebral fractures were observed in 56.4% (n = 114) of the study group. The frequency of osteoporosis was 20.0% (53 of 264 patients), and osteopenia was 35.6% (94 of 264 patients). Bone mineral density (BMD) levels were in the normal range in 40.3% (n = 46) of the subjects with vertebral fractures. It was in the osteoporotic range in 20.1% (n = 23) and the osteopenic range in 40.3% (n = 46). Vertebral fractures were associated with age, duration of hemodialysis, BMI, and femoral neck Z score (R² 37.8%, p = 0.027).

CONCLUSION

As incipient vertebral fractures can be observed in patients with normal BMD levels in kidney transplant recipients, conventional X-ray screening for vertebral fractures may be beneficial for a proper therapy decision of metabolic bone disease in kidney transplant recipients.

Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the risk of fragility fractures in long-term kidney graft recipients

BACKGROUND

Although the prevalence of osteoporosis and fractures in the first 6-12 months post-renal transplantation is high, little is known about the utility of bone mineral density (BMD) to predict fractures in long-term kidney graft recipients. Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning is a reliable tool for measuring glucocorticoid-induced and age-related bone loss in the elderly population. However, little is known about the utility of lateral spine DXA for patients with chronic kidney diseases. This study aimed to analyze the utility of lateral spine BMD for fragility fractures in long-term kidney graft recipients.

METHODS

A total of 357 stable kidney transplant recipients for a minimum of 1 year after kidney transplantation underwent DXA measurements at several sites, including the lateral spine between January 2017 and December 2018. We collected data on new incident fractures from the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

The median post-transplantation time at baseline DXA measurement was 12.6 years. During the median follow-up period of 3.5 years, 41 (11.4%) fractures occurred. The lateral spine BMDs were independently associated with fractures (adjusted hazard ratio 0.076; 95% confidence interval 0.012-0.42, p = 0.003). The cumulative incidence rate of fractures was significantly higher in the lower lateral spine BMD group (< 0.471 g/cm², optimal cut-off value by receiver operating characteristic curve) than in the higher lateral spine BMD group (23.4 vs. 7.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 4.92; 95% confidence interval 2.33-10.74, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Lateral lumbar spine BMD can be used to predict the risk of fragility fractures in long-term kidney graft recipients.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral Bone Disease biomarkers in kidney transplant patients

Background:

Chronic Kidney Disease associated with Mineral Bone Disease (CKD-MBD) is frequent in kidney transplant patients. Post-transplantation bone disease is complex, especially in patients with pre-existing metabolic bone disorders that are further affected by immunosuppressive medications and changes in renal allograft function. Main biochemical abnormalities of mineral metabolism in kidney transplantation (KTx) include hypophosphatemia, hyperparathyroidism (HPTH), insufficiency or deficiency of vitamin D, and hypercalcemia.

Objective:

This review aimed to summarize the pathophysiology and main biomarkers of CKD-MBD in KTx.

Methods:

A comprehensive and non-systematic search in PubMed was independently made with an emphasis on biomarkers in mineral bone disease in KTx.

Results:

CKD-MBD can be associated with numerous factors including secondary HPTH, metabolic dysregulations before KTx, and glucocorticoids therapy in post-transplant subjects. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) reaches normal levels after KTx with good allograft function, while calcium, vitamin D and phosphorus, ultimately, result in hypercalcemia, persistent vitamin D insufficiency, and hypophosphatemia respectively. As for PTH levels, there is an initial tendency of a significant decrease, followed by a raise due to secondary or tertiary HPTH. In regard to sclerostin levels, there is no consensus in the literature.

Conclusion:

KTx patients should be continuously evaluated for mineral homeostasis and bone status, both cases with successful kidney transplantation and those with reduced functionality. Additional research on CKD-MBD pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management is essential to guarantee long-term graft function, better prognosis, good quality of life, and reduced mortality for KTx patients.

Secondary Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a global public health problem, with fractures contributing to significant morbidity and mortality. Although postmenopausal osteoporosis is most common, up to 30% of postmenopausal women, > 50% of premenopausal women, and between 50% and 80% of men have secondary osteoporosis. Exclusion of secondary causes is important, as treatment of such patients often commences by treating the underlying condition. These are varied but often neglected, ranging from endocrine to chronic inflammatory and genetic conditions. General screening is recommended for all patients with osteoporosis, with advanced investigations reserved for premenopausal women and men aged < 50 years, for older patients in whom classical risk factors for osteoporosis are absent, and for all patients with the lowest bone mass (Z-score ≤ -2). The response of secondary osteoporosis to conventional anti-osteoporosis therapy may be inadequate if the underlying condition is unrecognized and untreated. Bone densitometry, using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, may underestimate fracture risk in some chronic diseases, including glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes, and obesity, and may overestimate fracture risk in others (eg, Turner syndrome). FRAX and trabecular bone score may provide additional information regarding fracture risk in secondary osteoporosis, but their use is limited to adults aged ≥ 40 years and ≥ 50 years, respectively. In addition, FRAX requires adjustment in some chronic conditions, such as glucocorticoid use, type 2 diabetes, and HIV. In most conditions, evidence for antiresorptive or anabolic therapy is limited to increases in bone mass. Current osteoporosis management guidelines also neglect secondary osteoporosis and these existing evidence gaps are discussed.

Natural History of Bone Disease following Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of the effect of kidney transplantation on bone is limited and fragmentary. The aim of this study was to characterize the evolution of bone disease in the first post-transplant year.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, observational cohort study in patients referred for kidney transplantation under a steroid-sparing immunosuppressive protocol. Bone phenotyping was done before, or at the time of, kidney transplantation, and repeated at 12 months post-transplant. The phenotyping included bone histomorphometry, bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and biochemical parameters of bone and mineral metabolism.

RESULTS

Paired data were obtained for 97 patients (median age 55 years; 72% male; 21% of patients had diabetes). Bone turnover remained normal or improved in the majority of patients (65%). Bone histomorphometry revealed decreases in bone resorption (eroded perimeter, mean 4.6% pre- to 2.3% post-transplant; P<0.001) and disordered bone formation (fibrosis, 27% pre- versus 2% post-transplant; P<0.001). Whereas bone mineralization was normal in all but one patient pretransplant, delayed mineralization was seen in 15% of patients at 1 year post-transplant. Hypophosphatemia was associated with deterioration in histomorphometric parameters of bone mineralization. Changes in bone mineral density were highly variable, ranging from -18% to +17% per year. Cumulative steroid dose was related to bone loss at the hip, whereas resolution of hyperparathyroidism was related to bone gain at both spine and hip.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in bone turnover, mineralization, and volume post-transplant are related both to steroid exposure and ongoing disturbances of mineral metabolism. Optimal control of mineral metabolism may be key to improving bone quality in kidney transplant recipients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Evolution of Bone Histomorphometry and Vascular Calcification Before and After Renal Transplantation, NCT01886950.

Contemporary kidney transplantation has a limited impact on bone microarchitecture

Bone microarchitecture is an important component of bone quality and disturbances may reduce bone strength and resistance to trauma. Kidney transplant recipients have an excess risk of fractures, and bone loss affecting both trabecular and cortical bone compartments have been demonstrated after kidney transplantation. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of kidney transplantation on trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture, assessed by histomorphometry and micro computed tomography (μCT). Iliac crest bone biopsies, analyzed by bone histomorphometry and μCT, were performed at time of kidney transplantation and 12 months post-transplantation in an unselected cohort of 30 patients. Biochemical markers of mineral metabolism and bone turnover were measured at both time-points. At 12 months post-transplantation, bone turnover was low in 5 (17%) and normal in 25 (83%) patients. By histomorphometry, bone remodeling normalized, with decreases in eroded perimeters (4.0 to 2.1%, p = 0.02) and number of patients with marrow fibrosis (41 to 0%, p < 0.001). By μCT, trabecular thickness (134 to 125 μM, p = 0.003) decreased slightly. Other parameters of bone volume and microarchitecture, including cortical thickness (729 to 713 μm, p = 0.73) and porosity (10.2 to 9.5%, p = 0.15), remained stable. We conclude that kidney transplantation with current immunosuppressive protocols has a limited impact on bone microarchitecture.

•

Bone structure after kidney transplantation was explored using biopsy, μCT, and DXA.

•

Modest trabecular bone loss was detected in the first post-transplant year.

•

Cortical thickness and porosity were overall stable post-transplant.

•

Contemporary kidney transplantation has minimal impact on bone microarchitecture.

Cholecalciferol Supplementation Attenuates Bone Loss in Incident Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prespecified Secondary Endpoint Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Vitamin D deficiency, persistent hyperparathyroidism, and bone loss are common after kidney transplantation (KTx). However, limited evidence exists regarding the effects of cholecalciferol supplementation on parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone loss after KTx. In this prespecified secondary endpoint analysis of a randomized controlled trial, we evaluated changes in PTH, bone metabolic markers, and bone mineral density (BMD). At 1 month post-transplant, we randomized 193 patients to an 11-month intervention with cholecalciferol (4000 IU/d) or placebo. The median baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level was 10 ng/mL and 44% of participants had osteopenia or osteoporosis. At the end of the study, the median 25(OH)D level was increased to 40 ng/mL in the cholecalciferol group and substantially unchanged in the placebo group. Compared with placebo, cholecalciferol significantly reduced whole PTH concentrations (between-group difference of -15%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -25 to -3), with greater treatment effects in subgroups with lower 25(OH)D, lower serum calcium, or higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (p_int  < 0.05). The percent change in lumbar spine (LS) BMD from before KTx to 12 months post-transplant was -0.2% (95% CI -1.4 to 0.9) in the cholecalciferol group and -1.9% (95% CI -3.0 to -0.8) in the placebo group, with a significant between-group difference (1.7%; 95% CI 0.1 to 3.3). The beneficial effect of cholecalciferol on LS BMD was prominent in patients with low bone mass p_int  < 0.05). Changes in serum calcium, phosphate, bone metabolic markers, and BMD at the distal radius were not different between groups. In mediation analyses, change in whole PTH levels explained 39% of treatment effects on BMD change. In conclusion, 4000 IU/d cholecalciferol significantly reduced PTH levels and attenuated LS BMD loss after KTx. This regimen has the potential to eliminate vitamin D deficiency and provides beneficial effects on bone health even under glucocorticoid treatment. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Quantitative Ultrasound of Phalanx in Primary and Secondary Osteoporosis: Mini-review and Practical Experience

Objective:

Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is gold standard of bone densitometry, but quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of bone is less expensive and portable. This study was designed to assess its usefulness in secondary osteoporosis diagnosis.

Materials and Methods:

There were 200 secondary osteoporosis cases (rheumatoid arthritis, hemodialysis, kidney transplant patients, and levothyroxine users) and of those, their phalanx QUS results were compared with normal controls. Also, the QUS and DXA results were compared to find any correlation of these methods for diagnosing osteoporosis.

Results:

There was not significantly different results compared with normal controls, except for those of hemodialysis patients ( P = .00). Also, the comparison of QUS with DXA results showed no significant correlation except in hemodialysis patients, in both spinal and femoral regions ( P = .023 and .21, respectively), as well as the levothyroxine group’s spinal region ( P = .005).

Conclusion:

These results suggest that QUS of phalanx may be useful in screening secondary osteoporosis but for establishment of diagnosis, DXA measurements are still needed.

Bone and Mineral Disease in Kidney Transplant Recipients

After kidney transplantation, mineral and bone disorders are associated with higher risk of fractures and consequent morbidity and mortality. Disorders of calcium and phosphorus, vitamin D deficiency, and hyperparathyroidism are also common. The epidemiology of bone disease has evolved over the past several decades due to changes in immunosuppressive regimens, mainly glucocorticoid minimization or avoidance. The assessment of bone disease in kidney transplant recipients relies on risk factor recognition and bone mineral density assessment. Several drugs have been trialed for the treatment of post-transplant mineral and bone disorders. This review will focus on the epidemiology, effect, and treatment of metabolic and skeletal derangements in the transplant recipient.

Bone microarchitecture and estimated failure load are deteriorated whether patients with chronic kidney disease have normal bone mineral density, osteopenia or osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is recommended in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, most persons in the community and most patients with CKD have osteopenia, suggesting fracture risk is low. Bone loss compromises bone microarchitecture which increases fragility disproportionate to modest deficits in BMD. We therefore hypothesized that patients with CKD have reduced estimated failure load due to deterioration in microarchitecture irrespective of whether they have normal femoral neck (FN) BMD, osteopenia or osteoporosis.

METHODS

We measured distal tibial and distal radial microarchitecture in 128 patients with CKD and 275 age- and sex-matched controls using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, FN-BMD using bone densitometry and estimated failure load at the distal appendicular sites using finite element analysis.

RESULTS

Patients versus controls respectively had: lower tibial cortical area 219 (40.7) vs. 237 (35.3) mm², p = 0.002, lower cortical volumetric BMD 543 (80.7) vs. 642 (81.7) mgHA/cm³ due to higher porosity 69.6 (6.19) vs. 61.9 (6.48)% and lower matrix mineral density 64.2 (0.62) vs. 65.1 (1.28)%, lower trabecular vBMD 92.2 (41.1) vs. 149 (43.0) mgHA/cm³ due to fewer and spatially disrupted trabeculae, lower FN-BMD 0.78 (0.12) vs. 0.94 (0.14) g/cm² and reduced estimated failure load 3825 (1152) vs. 5778 (1467) N, all p < 0.001. Deterioration in microarchitecture and estimated failure load was most severe in patients and controls with osteoporosis. Patients with CKD with osteopenia and normal FN-BMD had more deteriorated tibial microarchitecture and estimated failure load than controls with BMD in the same category. In univariate analyses, microarchitecture and FN-BMD were both associated with estimated failure load. In multivariable analyses, only microarchitecture was independently associated with estimated failure load and accounted for 87% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone fragility is likely to be present in patients with CKD despite them having osteopenia or normal BMD. Measuring microarchitecture may assist in targeting therapy to those at risk of fracture.

Tertiary and Postrenal Transplantation Hyperparathyroidism

Patients who have undergone kidney transplantation (KTx) (KTxps) are a distinctive population characterized by the persistence of some metabolic anomalies present during end-stage renal disease. Mineral metabolism (MM) parameters are frequently altered after KTx. These alterations involve calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D, and parathormone (PTH) disarrangements. At present, there is little consensus about the correct monitoring and management of PTH disorders in KTxps. This article presents the prevalence and epidemiologic and clinical impact of post-KTx hyper-PTH. The principal biochemical and instrumental investigations and the therapeutic options for these conditions are also reported.

Bone Quality in CKD Patients: Current Concepts and Future Directions - Part I

BACKGROUND

There is ample evidence that patients with CKD have an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures. Bone fragility is not only influenced by low bone volume and mass but also by poor microarchitecture and tissue quality. More emphasis has been given to the quantitative rather than qualitative assessment of bone health, both in general population and CKD patients. Although bone mineral density (BMD) is a very useful clinical tool in assessing bone strength, it may underestimate the fracture risk in CKD patients. Serum and urinary bone biomarkers have been found to be reflective of bone activities and predictive of fractures independently of BMD in CKD patients. Bone quality and fracture risk in CKD patients can be better assessed by utilizing new technologies such as trabecular bone score and high-resolution imaging studies. Additionally, invasive assessments such as bone histology and micro-indentation are useful counterparts in the evaluation of bone quality.

SUMMARY

A precise diagnosis of the underlying skeletal abnormalities in CKD patients is crucial to prevent further bone loss and fractures. We must consider bone quantity and quality abnormalities for management of CKD patients. Here in this part I, we are focusing on advances in bone quality diagnostics that are expected to help in proper understanding of the bone health in CKD patients.

KEY MESSAGES

Assessment of bone quality and quantity in CKD patients is essential. Both noninvasive and invasive techniques for the assessment of bone quality are available.

Effect of neridronate in osteopenic patients after heart, liver or lung transplant: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Transplantation (Tx) is an effective therapeutic option in patients with end-stage organ failure and osteoporosis and related fractures are a recognized complication in these patients. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of neridronate in patients with reduced bone mass after Tx of the heart, liver or lung.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized double-blind controlled trial (RCT), 22 patients were treated with neridronate (25 mg i.m./month) and 17 received placebo. All patients received daily oral calcium (500 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 months and markers of bone turnover at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (11 heart Tx, 21 liver Tx, 7 lung Tx), aged 49.3±9.1 years, with a T-score <-2.0 SD at lumbar spine or femoral level were included. In neridronate-treated patients, a significant increase in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) was observed after 12 months vs. placebo control (0.92±0.13 g/cm² vs. 0.84±0.08 g/cm²; P=0.005). Femur and hip BMD remained unchanged between groups. Total alkaline phosphatase, bone alkaline phosphatase and beta-cross-laps significantly decreased over the 12 months in neridronate-treated patients vs. placebo, respectively (107.4±74 U/L vs. 157.6±107.1 U/L, P=0.002; 5.7±3.3 µg/L vs. 11.7±4.3 µg/L, P<0.001 and 0.25±0.13 ng/mL vs. 0.73±0.57 ng/mL, P<0.001). No difference was observed between neridronate and placebo groups regarding safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first RCT that demonstrates the efficacy of neridronate in increasing bone density and reducing bone turnover in organ Tx recipients with significant skeletal morbidity.

Glucocorticoid- and Transplantation-Induced Osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis; nonetheless, it remains an undertreated condition. Transplantation-induced osteoporosis encompasses a broad range of unique pathogenetic features with distinct characteristics dependent on the transplanted organ. Understanding the pathogenesis of bone loss is key to recommending osteoporosis therapy in these patients. This review summarizes recent advances and addresses current issues in these fields.

Traditional and Non-traditional Risk Factors for Osteoporosis in CKD

Osteoporosis is a state of bone fragility with reduced skeletal resistance to trauma, and consequently increased risk of fracture. A wide range of conditions, including traditional risk factors, lifestyle choices, diseases and their treatments may contribute to bone fragility. It is therefore not surprising that the multi-morbid patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is at a particularly high risk. CKD is associated with reduced bone quantity, as well as impaired bone quality. Bone fragility in CKD is a composite of primary osteoporosis, accumulation of traditional and uremia-related risk factors, assaults brought on by systemic disease, and detrimental effects of drugs. Some risk factors are modifiable and represent potential targets for intervention. This review provides an overview of the heterogeneity of bone fragility in CKD.

Bone Mineral Disease After Kidney Transplantation

Chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) after kidney transplantation is a mix of pre-existing disorders and new alterations. The final consequences are reflected fundamentally as abnormal mineral metabolism (hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia) and bone alterations [high or low bone turnover disease (as fibrous osteitis or adynamic bone disease), an eventual compromise of bone mineralization, decrease bone mineral density and bone fractures]. The major cause of post-transplantation hypercalcemia is the persistence of severe secondary hyperparathyroidism, and treatment options include calcimimetics or parathyroidectomy. On turn, hypophosphatemia is caused by both the persistence of high blood levels of PTH and/or high blood levels of FGF23, with its correction being very difficult to achieve. The most frequent bone morphology alteration is low bone turnover disease, while high-turnover osteopathy decreases in frequency after transplantation. Although the pathogenic mechanisms of these abnormalities have not been fully clarified, the available evidence suggests that there are a number of factors that play a very important role, such as immunosuppressive treatment, persistently high levels of PTH, vitamin D deficiency and hypophosphatemia. Fracture risk is four-fold higher in transplanted patients compared to general population. The most relevant risk factors for fracture in the kidney transplant population are diabetes mellitus, female sex, advanced age (especially > 65 years), dialysis vintage, high PTH levels and low phosphate levels, osteoporosis, pre-transplant stress fracture and high doses or prolonged steroids therapy. Treatment alternatives for CKD-MBD after transplantation include minimization of corticosteroids, use of calcium and vitamin D supplements, antiresorptives (bisphosphonates or Denosumab) and osteoformers (synthetic parathyroid hormone). As both mineral metabolism and bone disorders lead to increased morbidity and mortality, the presence of these changes after transplantation has to be prevented (if possible), minimized, diagnosed, and treated as soon as possible.

Mineral Bone Disorders in Kidney Transplantation

Bone disease after kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of fractures, morbidity, and mortality. Its pathophysiology is complex, involving multiple contributors including pretransplant bone disease, immunosuppressive medications, and changes in the parathyroid-bone-kidney axis. Risk scores, bone turnover markers, and noninvasive imaging modalities are only able to partially predict the fracture risk in kidney transplant recipients. The optimal management of bone disease after kidney transplantation has not yet been established, with only a limited number of randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of treatment regimens in kidney transplant recipients. This review focuses on the pathophysiology, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of post-kidney transplant mineral and bone disease as guided by recent evidence.

Changes in body composition in peritoneal dialysis patients after kidney transplantation

PURPOSE

Serial follow-up data of body composition from peritoneal dialysis (PD) initiation until 1 year after kidney transplantation (KT) would be useful in identifying pathologic or physiologic changes, related to each modality or during the exchange of the modality.

METHODS

Body composition analysis was performed 1 month after PD initiation, repeated annually, immediately before KT, 1 month and 1 year after KT (n = 43). Body composition analysis was performed using a bioimpedance analysis (BIA) machine. The body composition parameters measured using BIA included the water contents, fat mass index (FMI), appendicular muscle mass index (aMMI), and bone mineral content (BMC).

RESULTS

The aMMI values 1 month and 1 year after PD initiation, immediately before KT, and 1 month and 1 year after KT were 7.6 ± 1.5, 7.8 ± 1.4, 8.0 ± 1.4, 6.8 ± 0.9, and 7.0 ± 1.0 kg/m², respectively. The aMMI increased during the first year of PD (P = 0.029) and was maintained during the remaining period of PD (P = 0.413). The value decreased during the first month after KT (P < 0.001) and recovered during the first year after KT (P = 0.010). FMI increased during the first year of PD (P < 0.001) and was maintained during the remaining period of PD (P = 0.214). The value increased during the first year of KT (P < 0.001). BMC was stable during the PD period but decreased after KT. Body waters were maintained during PD and decreased after KT. The presence of low muscle mass (LMM) 1 month after PD initiation or 1 month after KT, was associated with development of LMM 1 year after KT.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that body composition was significantly changed during the first year after PD or the first month after KT, as evidenced by a decrease in aMMI and BMC and an increase in FMI. Adequate interventions provided at these two points might help maintain proper body composition.

Bone Mineral Density and Aortic Calcification: Evidence for a Bone-vascular Axis After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorders (CKD-MBD) and vascular calcification are often seen in kidney transplantation recipients (KTR). This study focused on the bone-vascular axis hypothesis, the pathophysiological mechanisms driving both bone loss and vascular calcification, supported by an association between lower bone mineral density (BMD) and higher risk of vascular calcification.

METHODS

KTR referred for a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry procedure within 6 mo after transplantation were included in a cross-sectional study (2004-2014). Areal BMD was measured at the proximal femur, and abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) was quantified (8-points score) from lateral single-energy images of the lumbar spine. Patients were divided into 3 AAC categories (negative-AAC: AAC 0; low-AAC: AAC 1-3; and high-AAC: AAC 4-8). Multivariable-adjusted multinomial logistic regression models were performed to study the association between BMD and AAC.

RESULTS

We included 678 KTR (51 ± 13 y old, 58% males), 366 (54%) had BMD disorders, and 266 (39%) had detectable calcification. High-AAC was observed in 9%, 11%, and 25% of KTR with normal BMD, osteopenia, and osteoporosis, respectively (P < 0.001). Higher BMD (T-score, continuous) was associated with a lower risk of high-AAC (odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.88; P = 0.008), independent of age, sex, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and immunosuppressive therapy. KTR with normal BMD were less likely to have high-AAC (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.72; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

BMD disorders are highly prevalent in KTR. The independent inverse association between BMD and AAC may provide evidence to point toward the existence, while highlighting the clinical and epidemiological relevance, of a bone-vascular axis after kidney transplantation.

Factors Affecting Bone Health in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Klotho Gene Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Other Clinical Features

OBJECTIVES

Posttransplant bone diseases are a major cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. We investigated the relationship between klotho gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms and bone diseases after kidney transplant. We also aimed to identify possible risk factors for development of bone disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of 251 kidney transplant recipients (164 men and 87 women) with minimum follow-up of 3 years after kidney transplant. Patients with prolonged immobilization, malignancy, parathyroidectomy, glomerular filtration rates less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m², hypo- or hyperthyroidism, and treatment with drugs that affect bone metabolism were excluded. We investigated the relationship between 6 single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the klotho gene (rs480780, rs211234, rs576404, rs211235, rs9536314, and rs1207568) and development of osteoporosis, avascular bone necrosis, and persistent hyperparathyroidism.

RESULTS

Longer dialysis treatment (odds ratio, 1.13; P = .002) and rs211235 single-nucleotide polymorphism in the klotho gene (odds ratio, 9.87; P = .001 for GG genotype) were significantly associated with persistent hyperparathyroidism. A higher magnesium level was detected as a protective factor from development of persistent hyperparathyroidism (odds ratio, 0.19; P = .009). Persistent hyperparathyroidism was defined as a risk factor for development of osteopenia/osteoporosis (odds ratio, 2.76; P = .003) and avascular bone necrosis (odds ratio, 2.52; P= .03). Although the rs480780 (odds ratio, 8.73; P = .04) single-nucleotide polymorphism in the klotho gene was defined as a risk factor for development of osteopenia/osteoporosis, none of the klotho single-nucleotide polymorphisms was found to be associated with development of avascular bone necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent hyperparathyroidism could be an important indicator for development of bone disease in kidney transplant recipients. Also, some of the klotho gene single-nucleotide polymorphisms are associated with higher risk for bone disease after kidney transplant.