A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients

Efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin for elderly patients: results from the CCOG-1302 study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy using oxaliplatin in addition to 5-FU-based anticancer agents has become the standard treatment for colorectal cancer, however, there is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin combination therapy in the elderly patients. In this study, retrospective analysis of the results from the CCOG-1302 study was performed to confirm them.

METHODS

The patients in the CAPOX continuous (8 courses of CAPOX) and intermittent (2 courses of CAPOX + 4 courses of capecitabine + 2 courses of CAPOX) treatment arms in the CCOG-1302 study were divided into two groups, namely, the elderly (≥ 70) and non-elderly (< 70 years) groups. The adverse events, residual peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) and prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of grade 3 or higher hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities in the continuous and intermittent treatment arm were not significantly different between the elderly and non-elderly groups. During the follow-up period, the percentages of grade I or higher PSN residuals were significantly higher among the elderly individuals in the continuous treatment arm at years 2, 3, 4, and 5. On the other hand, PSN decreased over time in the intermittent treatment arm as well as in the elderly and non-elderly patients. The 3-year DFS was not significantly different between the elderly and non-elderly groups in the continuous and intermittent treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy can be safely administered to elderly patients. In addition, intermittent administration may be more useful in elderly individuals for the prevention of PSN.

Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on short-term and long-term outcomes in elderly patients with colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The oncologic impact of D3 lymph node dissection (LND) for colon cancer (CC) has been reported to be favorable. However, D3 LND is potentially more invasive than non-D3 LND, and whether it is beneficial for elderly patients with CC remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative safety and short- and long-term oncologic outcomes of D3 LND in elderly patients with CC.

METHODS

Subjects were 442 elderly patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent curative surgery for pathologic stage (pStage) I-III CC between 2011 and 2022. Background clinical factors and short- and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who received D3 LND (D3 group; n = 363) and those who received non-D3 LND (non-D3 group; n = 79).

RESULTS

The D3 group had a significantly higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (median 20 vs. 12, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of postoperative complications (18% vs. 32%, p = 0.040) than the non-D3 group. In the overall cohort, overall survival (OS) did not differ between the two groups. Among pStage III patients, however, OS was significantly better (69.8% vs. 34.1%, p = 0.028), and RFS tended to be better (60.7% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.075) in the D3 group than in the non-D3 group. Multivariable analysis revealed that D3 LND was independently associated with better OS (HR 0.477; 95% CI 0.245-0.931, p = 0.030) and tended to be associated with better RFS (HR 0.588; 95% CI 0.329-1.051, p = 0.073).

CONCLUSION

D3 LND is safe and effective in improving the prognosis of elderly patients with pStage II/III CC.

Results of radical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that 60% of new rectal cancer cases will be diagnosed in patients ≥ 65 years old. The geriatric patient is heterogeneous and underrepresented in clinical trials, and oncologic therapies are often tailored with little evidence. We describe a cohort of patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective and descriptive analysis of 137 patients, 44 (32.1%) ≥ 75 years old and 93 (67.9%) ≤ 75 years old, with diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Mean age was 79.5 for ≥ 75 years and 62.7 for ≤ 75 years, tumor location was: upper rectum (16.1% and 11.3%), middle rectum (60.2% and 47.7%) and lower rectum (23.7% and 41%), using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0: 74.1% and 81.8%, ECOG 1: 25.9% and 18.2%. Pathological complete response was 21.5% and 22.7%, partial response, 57% and 59% and no response, 21.5% and 18.3%, respectively. Tumor shrinkage in both groups after neoadjuvant treatment was 34.5% and 35.46%. Local recurrence was 2.2% and 3.2% and distance recurrence, 11.3% and 8.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The study shows similar outcomes in both groups following radical treatment, with similar rates of pathological complete response. However, it has notable limitations, including a small sample size and the absence of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. To enhance these findings, future research should involve larger patient cohorts with comparative analysis and clinical trials specifically focused on the geriatric population.

Microglia-Mediated Synaptic Dysfunction Contributes to Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment

Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) significantly impacts cancer survivors. Due to unclear mechanisms, effective treatments for cognitive deficits are lacking. Here, we examined if microglia-mediated deficits in synaptic plasticity drive CRCI. Adult male mice were treated with the chemotherapeutic drugs 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-Fu/LV, intraperitoneal injection, I.P.) on Days 1, 8, and 15 at a dosage of 50 mg/kg for 5-Fu and 90 mg/kg for LV for 3 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed using a novel object recognition (NOR) test 4 weeks after completion of 5-Fu/LV treatment. Compared with vehicle treatment, 5-Fu/LV treatment reduced the preference for exploring novel objects in the NOR test. Treatment with 5-Fu/LV increased the numbers of Iba1-positive microglial and CD68-positive/Iba1-positive microglia with shortened process lengths and diminished endpoints but decreased the number of phagocytotic (≤ 1 FITC-labeled beads) Iba1-positive microglia. Furthermore, 5-Fu/LV treatment reduced the long-term potentiation (LTP) recorded in the hippocampal CA1 region in response to a theta burst stimulation of the CA3-CA1 pathway and decreased the evoked N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor (NMDAR)-excitatory postsynaptic currents (NMDAR-EPSCs) in CA1 neurons. Cotreatment with the microglial inhibitor minocycline (33 mg/kg, daily for 3 weeks) restored cognitive deficits and microglial ramification, decreased the number of CD68-positive microglia, and reversed the reductions in LTP and the amplitude of NMDAR-EPSCs in 5-Fu/LV-treated mice. Our data suggest that microglial dysfunction and related synaptic dysfunction contribute to 5-Fu/LV-induced cognitive impairment.

Risk Without Reward: Differing Patterns of Chemotherapy Use Do Not Improve Outcomes in Stage II Early-Onset Colon Cancer

PURPOSE

Rising rates of early-onset colon cancer (EOCC) present challenges in deciding how to optimally treat patients. Although standard of care for stage II CC is surgical resection, adding chemotherapy for high-risk disease, evidence suggests treatment selection may differ by age. We investigated whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) administration rates differ between patients with early- and later-onset stage II CC.

METHODS

Data originated from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database spanning January 1, 2003, to August 1, 2021. Adults with stage II CC were grouped as age 18-49 years (EOCC) and those age 50 years or older (later-onset colon cancer [LOCC]). Demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, tumor stage and site, and chemotherapy were included. Primary outcomes included rates of AC administration by age and ethnicity; secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and time to metastatic disease (TTMD). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated relationships between chemotherapy administration, age, and ethnicity, adjusting for significant covariates.

RESULTS

One thousand sixty-five patients were included. Median age of patients with EOCC was 45.0 years versus 69.0 years for patients with LOCC. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed patients with EOCC received AC significantly more often than patients with LOCC. Non-Hispanic patients received AC at significantly lower rates than Hispanic patients in both cohorts. Subanalysis of stage IIA patients showed that patients with EOCC were more likely to receive AC than patients with LOCC. No significant differences in OS or TTMD were observed by age regardless of AC administration in stage II overall; however, patients with stage IIA EOCC receiving AC had significantly longer TTMD than those not receiving AC.

CONCLUSION

AC was given preferentially in stage II EOCC, even in stage IIA, despite deviation from guidelines. This may expose low-risk patients to unnecessary toxicities and suggests bias toward treating younger patients more aggressively, despite unclear evidence for better outcomes.

Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II large (≥5 cm) colonic adenocarcinomas: A propensity-score matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend selective adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer with high-risk features. This study aimed to assess survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon adenocarcinomas ≥5 cm without high-risk features.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was retrospectively reviewed (2010-2019) for all patients with pathologic stage II colonic adenocarcinomas ≥5 cm who underwent colectomy. Patients were divided into adjuvant and control groups that were propensity-score matched for baseline and treatment confounders. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Of 23,937 included patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 2581 (10.8 %). Patient given adjuvant chemotherapy were younger, more often male, Black, had a Charlson score of 0 and private insurance, presented with left-sided cancers and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors, and more frequently underwent segmental resections and open surgery. 796 patients in the adjuvant group were matched to 1592 patients in the control group. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.79; p = 0.022), however, it was not independently associated with improved OS when adjusted for other confounders (HR: 0.84; p = 0.157). The adjuvant group had significantly longer restricted mean OS than the control group (104.9 vs. 100.8 months; p = 0.007). The survival benefit was only noted in patients >50 years, female, White, with non-mucinous adenocarcinomas, MSS tumors, normal CEA levels, and had undergone open and emergency surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not demonstrate a clear survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II adenocarcinoma ≥5 cm. A possible potential survival benefit was observed only in a subgroup of patients.

Socioeconomic and geographic variation in adjuvant chemotherapy among elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in Norway - a national register-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

About half of the patients diagnosed with colon cancer are 70 years or older. Standard treatment for stage III colon cancer is major surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Norwegian guidelines recommend initiation of ACT within 6 weeks after resection.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated socioeconomic and geographic variation in the recommended provision of ACT to elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in Norway.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study included patients aged 70 years or older diagnosed with stage III colon cancer between 2011 and 2021 who underwent major surgical resection. Individual data were obtained from national registries. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was used to model variation in provision of ACT.

RESULTS

Of 4 501 included patients, 603 (13%) and 1 182 (26%) received ACT within 6 and 8 weeks after resection, respectively. The provision of ACT decreased with increasing age and frailty. Odds of ACT within 6 weeks decreased for patients with low socioeconomic status (SES) compared to high SES (odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.91)), and decreased for patients living alone compared to those living with a cohabitant (OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.58-0.91)). Geographic variation was found between hospital referral areas (OR 0.41-2.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that ACT provision to elderly stage III colon cancer patients is associated with SES and geography, indicating variation in guidelines adherence. Further research is needed to explore the impact of ACT timing among elderly patients with stage III colon cancer in Norway.

Lobaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of lobaplatin-based CCRT in elderly patients with NPC.

METHODS

We included stage II-IVA NPC patients aged ≥65 years who received lobaplatin concomitant with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) between March 2019 and January 2023. Objective response rates and treatment-related toxicity were assessed. Kaplan-Meier's analysis was performed to calculate survival rates.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were included with a median age of 67 years. There were 19 patients (65.5%) who had comorbidities. All patients had serum EBV-DNA detective before treatment; the median EBV-DNA load was 236 IU/mL. There were 25 (86.2%) patients treated with induction chemotherapy, and the overall response rate was 92.0%. All patients received IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy with lobaplatin. During the CCRT, the most common adverse effect was haematological toxicity. Three patients (10.3%) had grade 3 leucopenia, three patients (10.3%) had grade 3 neutropenia, and eight patients (27.6%) had grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. The rate of grade 3 mucositis was 34.5%. No patients had liver and kidney dysfunction. The median weight loss was 4 kg during CCRT. After three months of CCRT, the total response rate was 100%. EBV-DNA was not detected in any patients. The median follow-up was 32.1 months. The 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival were 95.8%, 85.7%, 82.5% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lobaplatin-based CCRT is safe and feasible for elderly NPC patients, with satisfactory short-term survival outcomes and acceptable toxicities. A phase 2 trial is ongoing to investigate the role of lobaplatin-based CCRT on long-term survival and treatment toxicities for this population.

Prediction of moderate and severe toxicities of chemotherapy in older patients with cancer: a propensity weighted analysis of ELCAPA cohort

BACKGROUND

Currently available predictive models for chemotherapy-related toxicity are not sufficiently discriminative in older patients with cancer and do not consider moderate toxicities. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with moderate and severe chemotherapy toxicities in older patients with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients aged 70+ recruited in the prospective ELCAPA cohort were analyzed. A total of 837 patients with data on toxicities had received chemotherapy without other systemic treatment and were included between 2015 and 2022. To adjust for any imbalances in the distribution of covariates between patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy vs combination chemotherapy, we applied overlap weighting (a propensity-score-based technique). We used multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) age was 81 (77-84). Forty-one percent experienced moderate toxicity, and 33% experienced severe toxicity. Hematologic toxicities accounted for 53% of severe toxicities and 66% of moderate toxicities. Age <80 years, cancer type, metastatic status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) >1, no cognitive impairment were associated with combination chemotherapy decision. In a univariate analysis with overlap weighting, no factors were associated with moderate toxicity. Hemoglobin < 10 g/dL and a CIRS-G score >12 were associated with severe toxicity. In a multivariate analysis, only hemoglobin < 10 g/dL was independently associated with severe toxicity, adjusted OR 2.96 (95% CI, 1.20-7.29).

CONCLUSION

By addressing indication bias for combination chemotherapy decision, only anemia and not cancer type, combination chemotherapy was predicting for severe chemotherapy-related toxicity in older patients with cancer. We did not find any predictors of moderate chemotherapy-related toxicity.

Prognostic impact of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on elderly patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Currently, the primary treatment modality for patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRA) is radical surgery combined with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC). However, many elderly patients decline PAC due to concerns about their underlying physiological condition, and the impact of PAC on the prognosis of elderly patients remains uncertain.

METHODS

We extracted data from the SEER database for CRA patients aged 75 and above between 2010 and 2019. Utilizing propensity score matching (PSM), we stratified the patients into a PAC group and a non-PAC group, enabling us to compare the differences in Kaplan-Meier survival curves between these two groups. Furthermore, through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, we identified the clinical factors that influence the survival of elderly CRA patients and compared the prognostic disparities between the two patient groups within specific subgroups of these clinical factors.

RESULTS

Following PSM, a total of 3668 patients were included and divided into the PAC group and the non-PAC group, with no statistically significant differences observed in crucial clinical characteristics between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly better prognosis for patients in the PAC group compared with those in the non-PAC group. In addition, age, chemotherapy, TNM staging, gender, and preoperative CEA levels were all identified as important factors affecting patient prognosis. Moreover, PAC provided survival benefits across the majority of levels within the aforementioned subgroups. However, in specific subgroups (age > 90, Grade IV stage, median household income < $40 000), PAC did not confer any survival benefits.

CONCLUSION

PAC can significantly improve the prognosis of elderly CRA patients. Nonetheless, in certain population subsets characterized by specific clinical features, PAC does not provide any survival benefits.

Abdominal Aortic Calcification as a Predictor of Incomplete Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives Completion of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) contributes to the improved prognosis of patients with pathological stage (pStage) III colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, identifying patients with AC intolerance is important. Although abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) indicates frailty, its clinical impact on AC completion remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the association between AAC and AC incompletion. Methods Patients who underwent AC for pStage III CRC between 2010 and 2021 (n = 161) were enrolled in this study. AAC volume was evaluated by preoperative CT tomography, and the patients were divided into two groups based on an AAC cutoff of 992 mm3, determined using the receiver operating characteristic curves for AC completion. We investigated the perioperative clinicopathological factors and compared the frequency and severity of AC adverse events between the groups. Results The high AAC group had a significantly higher proportion of patients with older age, male sex, hypertension, and AC incompletion than the low AAC group. The regimens were not significantly different. No significant difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events was observed in either group. In the multivariate analysis, high AAC and older age were significantly associated with AC incompletion. Furthermore, k-means cluster analysis based on both age and AAC volume also demonstrated an increased risk of AC incompletion in patients with stage III CRC as both age and AAC volume increased. High AAC was associated with diminished improvement in nutritional status or inflammatory markers after the administration of AC. Conclusions High AAC is a potential risk marker for predicting AC incompletion in patients with stage III CRC before introducing AC. This article was previously posted to the Research Square preprint server on May 16, 2024.

Hospital Service Volume as an Indicator of Treatment Patterns for Colorectal Cancer

INTRODUCTION

A hospital's approach (volume of cancer treatment services provided) to treating metastatic colorectal cancer influences a patient's treatment as strongly as patient disease status. The implications of hospital-level treatment approaches across disease stages remain understudied. We sought to determine if hospital service volume (SV) for metastatic colorectal cancer could be predictive of nonstandard treatment patterns in stages I-III colon cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we examined rates of nonstandard treatment patterns among patients with colon cancer between 2010 and 2017. After adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the relationship between hospital-level SV for metastatic colorectal cancer and nonstandard treatment approaches for patients with stages I-III colon cancer.

RESULTS

There were significant associations between hospital-level SV for metastatic colorectal cancer and the odds of chemotherapy overtreatment among patients with stage I-III colon cancer, as well as undertreatment among patients with stages II-III disease after adjusting for hospital-, patient-, and tumor-level covariates. Patients at the highest-level SV hospitals for metastatic disease had 1.29 higher odds (95% CI = 1.18-1.41; P < 0.0001) of receiving overtreatment compared to patients from lowest SV hospitals. The odds ratio of undertreatment in highest SV compared to lowest SV was 0.64 (95% CI 0.56-0.72; P< 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital-level SV of patients with metastatic colon cancer is a significant indicator of nonstandard treatment patterns among patients with stage I-III colon cancer. Hospitals with the highest volume of cancer treatments have higher odds of providing overtreatment, while low SVs are associated with higher odds of undertreatment.

Insights into the use of biomarkers in clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease

Biomarkers have been instrumental in population selection and disease monitoring in clinical trials of recently FDA-approved drugs targeting amyloid-β to slow the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). As new therapeutic strategies and biomarker techniques emerge, the importance of biomarkers in drug development is growing exponentially. In this emerging landscape, biomarkers are expected to serve a wide range of contexts of use in clinical trials focusing on AD and related dementias. The joint FDA-NIH BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) framework provides standardised terminology to facilitate communication among stakeholders in this increasingly complex field. This review explores various applications of biomarkers relevant to AD clinical trials, using the BEST resource as a reference. For simplicity, we predominantly provide contextual characterizations of biomarkers use from the perspective of drugs targeting amyloid-β and tau proteins. However, general definitions and concepts can be extrapolated to other targets.

Killing tumor-associated bacteria with a liposomal antibiotic generates neoantigens that induce anti-tumor immune responses

Increasing evidence implicates the tumor microbiota as a factor that can influence cancer progression. In patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), we found that pre-resection antibiotics targeting anaerobic bacteria substantially improved disease-free survival by 25.5%. For mouse studies, we designed an antibiotic silver-tinidazole complex encapsulated in liposomes (LipoAgTNZ) to eliminate tumor-associated bacteria in the primary tumor and liver metastases without causing gut microbiome dysbiosis. Mouse CRC models colonized by tumor-promoting bacteria (Fusobacterium nucleatum spp.) or probiotics (Escherichia coli Nissle spp.) responded to LipoAgTNZ therapy, which enabled more than 70% long-term survival in two F. nucleatum-infected CRC models. The antibiotic treatment generated microbial neoantigens that elicited anti-tumor CD8+ T cells. Heterologous and homologous bacterial epitopes contributed to the immunogenicity, priming T cells to recognize both infected and uninfected tumors. Our strategy targets tumor-associated bacteria to elicit anti-tumoral immunity, paving the way for microbiome-immunotherapy interventions.

Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes in Human Colorectal Cancer Using RNASeq Data Validated on the Molecular Level with Real-Time PCR

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent cancer with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide. Late diagnosis is a significant contributor to low survival rates in a minority of cases. The study aimed to perform a robust pipeline using integrated bioinformatics tools that will enable us to identify potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for early detection of CRC by exploring differentially expressed genes (DEGs). In addition to, testing the capability of replacing chemotherapy with plant extract in CRC treatment by validating it using real-time PCR. RNA-seq data from cancerous and adjacent normal tissues were pre-processed and analyzed using various tools such as FastQC, Kallisto, DESeq@ R package, g:Profiler, GNEMANIA-CytoScape and CytoHubba, resulting in the identification of 1641 DEGs enriched in various signaling routes. MMP7, TCF21, and VEGFD were found to be promising diagnostic biomarkers for CRC. An in vitro experiment was conducted to examine the potential anticancer properties of 5-fluorouracile, Withania somnifera extract, and their combination. The extract was found to exhibit a positive trend in gene expression and potential therapeutic value by targeting the three genes; however, further trials are required to regulate the methylation promoter. Molecular docking tests supported the findings by revealing a stable ligand-receptor complex. In conclusion, the study's analysis workflow is precise and robust in identifying DEGs in CRC that may serve as biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment. Additionally, the identified DEGs can be used in future research with larger sample sizes to analyze CRC survival.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a single-centre observational study in Japan

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) following radical resection. The aim of the present study is to review appropriate chemotherapeutic regimens for elderly patients. We examined 1138 Japanese patients who were operated for high-risk stage II or stage III CRC between July 2010 and June 2021 at our hospital. Patients were divided according to an age of 70 years. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy was analyzed in association with age and adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens. A total of 507 patients (45%) were ≥70 years old. They were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) or palliative chemotherapy after recurrence (p < 0.001) than patients aged <70 years. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) in stage III CRC patients was longer in the <70 years group than in the ≥70 years group (p = 0.006); however, CSS by regimens did not significantly differ between these groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with the longer relapse-free survival of stage III CRC patients in the <70 years group (p = 0.005). Although adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a favourable CSS regardless of age, the implementation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly CRC patients was low, which may explain shorter CSS in stage III CRC patients the ≥70 years group than in the <70 years group.

Targeting FGFR1 by β,β-dimethylacrylalkannin suppresses the proliferation of colorectal cancer in cellular and xenograft models

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to be a major global health challenge, ranking as a top cause of cancer-related mortality. Alarmingly, the five-year survival rate for CRC patients hovers around a mere 10-30 %. The disruption of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFRs) signaling pathways is significantly implicated in the onset and advancement of CRC, presenting a promising target for therapeutic intervention in CRC management. Further investigation is essential to comprehensively elucidate FGFR1's function in CRC and to create potent therapies that specifically target FGFR1.

PURPOSE

This study aims to demonstrate the oncogenic role of FGFR1 in colorectal cancer and to explore the potential of β,β-dimethylacrylalkannin (β,β-DMAA) as a therapeutic option to inhibit FGFR1.

METHODS

In this research, we employed a comprehensive suite of techniques including tissue array, kinase profiling, computational docking, knockdown assay to predict and explore the inhibitor of FGFR1. Furthermore, we utilized kinase assay, pull-down, cell proliferation tests, and Patient derived xenograft (PDX) mouse models to further investigate a novel FGFR1 inhibitor and its impact on the growth of CRC.

RESULTS

In our research, we discovered that FGFR1 protein is markedly upregulated in colorectal cancer tissues, suggesting a significant role in regulating cellular proliferation, particularly in patients with colorectal cancer. Furthermore, we conducted a computational docking, kinase profiling analysis, simulation and identified that β,β-DMAA could directly bind with FGFR1 within ATP binding pocket domain. Cell-based assays confirmed that β,β-DMAA effectively inhibited the proliferation of colon cancer cells and also triggered cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and altered FGFR1-mediated signaling pathways. Moreover, β,β-DMAA effectively attenuated the development of PDX tumors in mice that were FGFR1-positive, with no notable toxicity observed. In summary, our study highlights the pivotal role of FGFR1 in colorectal cancer, suggesting that inhibiting FGFR1 activity could be a promising strategy for therapeutic intervention. We present strong evidence that targeting FGFR1 with β,β-DMAA is a viable approach for the management of colorectal cancer. Given its low toxicity and high efficacy, β,β-DMAA, as an FGFR1 inhibitor, warrants further investigation in clinical settings for the treatment of FGFR1-positive tumors.

Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.

Non-metastatic colon cancer: French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, AFEF, and SFR)

INTRODUCTION

This article is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of non-metastatic colon cancer (CC), revised in November 2022.

METHODS

These guidelines represent collaborative work of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of CC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B, and C) according to the level of evidence found in the literature published up to November 2022.

RESULTS

Initial evaluation of CC is based on clinical examination, colonoscopy, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. CC is usually managed by surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on the pathological findings. The use of adjuvant therapy remains a challenging question in stage II disease. For high-risk stage II CC, adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy proposed according to the type and number of poor prognostic features. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is the current standard for adjuvant therapy of patients with stage III CC. However, these regimens are associated with significant oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The results of the recent IDEA study provide evidence that 3 months of treatment with CAPOX is as effective as 6 months of oxaliplatin-based therapy in patients with low-risk stage III CC (T1-3 and N1). A 6-month oxaliplatin-based therapy remains the standard of care for high-risk stage III CC (T4 and/or N2). For patients unfit for oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is recommended.

CONCLUSION

French guidelines for non-metastatic CC management help to offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board and then the treatment option decided with the patient.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Recommendations, Treatment Administered and Impact on Cancer Recurrence

BACKGROUND

A substantial proportion of patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) are older than 70 years. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for older patients (OP) continues to be debated, with subgroup analyses of randomized trials not demonstrating a survival benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine backbone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the multisite Australian ACCORD registry, which prospectively collects patient, tumor and treatment data along with long term clinical follow-up. We compared OP (≥70) with stage III CRC to younger patients ([YP] <70), including the proportion recommended AC and any reasons for not prescribing AC. AC administration, regimen choice, completion rates, and survival outcomes were also examined.

RESULTS

One thousand five hundred twelve patients enrolled in the ACCORD registry from 2005 to 2018 were included. Median follow-up was 57.0 months. Compared to the 827 YP, the 685 OP were less likely to be offered AC (71.5% vs. 96.5%, P < .0001) and when offered, were more likely to decline treatment (15.1% vs. 2.8%, P < .0001). Ultimately, 60.0% of OP and 93.7% of YP received AC (P < .0001). OP were less likely to receive oxaliplatin (27.5% vs. 84.7%, P < .0001) and to complete AC (75.9% vs. 85.7%, P < .0001). The probability of remaining recurrence-free was significantly higher in OP who received AC compared to those not treated (HR 0.73, P = .04) but not significantly improved with the addition of oxaliplatin (HR 0.75, P = .18).

CONCLUSION

OP were less likely than YP to receive AC. Receipt of AC reduced recurrences in OP, supporting its use, although no significant benefit was observed from the addition of oxaliplatin.

Survival outcomes of patients with stage III colorectal cancer aged ≥ 80 years who underwent curative resection: the HiSCO-04 prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with stage III colorectal cancer remains unclear. In parallel with a multicenter prospective phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy (HiSCO-03), we conducted a prospective observational study of these patients to assess survival outcomes, including those ineligible for chemotherapy.

METHODS

This multi-institutional prospective cohort study included 17 institutions in Hiroshima, Japan. Patients aged ≥ 80 years with stage III colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection were enrolled. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were 3-year overall and relapse-free survival. Propensity score matching was used to assess the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients were analyzed between 2013 and 2018, including 99 males and 115 females with a median age of 84 years (range 80-101 years). Recurrence occurred in 58 patients and secondary cancers were observed in 17. The 3-year disease-free, overall, and relapse-free survival rates were 63.3%, 76.9%, and 62.9%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 65 patients with a completion rate of 52%. In a study of 80 patients that adjusted for background factors using propensity score matching, patients who completed the planned treatment showed improved disease-free survival (3-year disease-free survival: completed, 80.0%; not received, 65.5%; and discontinued, 56.3%; p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Completion of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer aged ≥ 80 years, although the number of patients who would benefit from it is limited.

Update on the management of elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide, and 70% of CRC patients are over 65 years of age. However, the scientific evidence available for these patients is poor, as they are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours, (TTD) and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) have reviewed the scientific evidence available in older patients with CRC. This group of experts recommends a multidisciplinary approach and geriatric assessment (GA) before making a therapeutic decision because GA predicts the risk of toxicity and survival and helps to individualize treatment. In addition, elderly patients with localized CRC should undergo standard cancer resection, preferably laparoscopically. The indication for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) should be considered based on the potential benefit, the risk of recurrence, the life expectancy and patient comorbidities. When the disease is metastatic, the possibility of radical treatment with surgery, radiofrequency (RF) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should be considered. The efficacy of palliative CT is similar to that seen in younger patients, but elderly patients are at increased risk of toxicity. Clinical trials should be conducted with the elderly population and include GAs and specific treatment plans.

Tata Memorial Centre Evidence Based Management of Colorectal cancer

This review article examines the evidence-based management of colorectal cancers, focusing on topics characterized by ongoing debates and evolving evidence. To contribute to the scientific discourse, we intentionally exclude subjects with established guidelines, concentrating instead on areas where the current understanding is dynamic. Our analysis encompasses a thorough exploration of critical themes, including the evidence surrounding complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy in colon cancers. Additionally, we delve into the evolving landscape of perioperative chemotherapy in both colon and rectal cancers, considering its nuanced role in the context of contemporary treatment strategies. Advancements in surgical techniques are a pivotal aspect of our discussion, with an emphasis on the utilization of minimally invasive approaches such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery in both colon and rectal cancers, including advanced rectal cases. Moving beyond conventional radical procedures, we scrutinize the feasibility and implications of endoscopic resections for small tumors, explore the paradigm of organ preservation in locally advanced rectal cancers, and assess the utility of total neoadjuvant therapy in the current treatment landscape. Our final segment reviews pivotal trials that have significantly influenced the management of colorectal liver and peritoneal metastasis.

Association between social background and implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancers, sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended following colorectal cancer resection based on risk of recurrence. In older patients, treatment decisions should consider recurrence rates and tolerability, as well as functional prognosis, residual disease, and social factors. This study aims to investigate factors, including social background, influencing implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer.

METHODS

This multi-institutional prospective cohort study included 15 institutions belonging to the Hiroshima Surgical study group for Clinical Oncology. We analyzed 159 older patients aged ≥ 80 years, who underwent curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer between December 2013 and June 2018, as sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study.

RESULTS

In total, 62 (39.0%) patients underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Four factors were significantly associated with its implementation: performance status < 2, Charlson Comorbidity Index < 2, prognostic nutritional index ≥ 40, and presence of a spouse or siblings as lifestyle supporters. No significant difference was found in the backgrounds between complete and incomplete postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy patients.

CONCLUSION

Performance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, nutritional status, and presence of a spouse or siblings as lifestyle supporters are possible factors influencing the implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients. To select appropriate treatment options, including postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, it is essential to consider physical condition and comorbidities of older patients, thoroughly explain the situation to their families, and establish a support system to enhance understanding of the available treatment options.

Circulating Tumour DNA Guided Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making in Stage II Colon Cancer-A Clinical Vignette Study

Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker that may better identify stage II colon cancer (CC) patients who will benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) compared to standard clinicopathological parameters. The DYNAMIC study demonstrated that ctDNA-informed treatment decreased AC utilisation without compromising recurrence free survival, but medical oncologists' willingness to utilise ctDNA results to inform AC decision is unknown. Medical oncologists from Australia, Canada and New Zealand were presented with clinical vignettes for stage II CC comprised of two variables with three levels each (age: ≤50, 52-69, ≥70 years; and clinicopathological risk of recurrence: low, intermediate, high) and were queried about ctDNA testing and treatment recommendations based on results. Sixty-four colorectal oncologists completed at least one vignette (all vignettes, n = 59). The majority of oncologist were Australian (70%; Canada: n = 13; New Zealand: n = 6) and had over 10 years of clinical experience (n = 41; 64%). The proportion of oncologists requesting ctDNA testing exceeded 80% for all vignettes, except for age ≥ 70 and low-risk disease (63%). Following a positive ctDNA result, the proportion of oncologists recommending AC (p < 0.01) and recommending oxaliplatin-based doublet (p < 0.01) increased in all vignettes. Following a negative result, the proportion recommending AC decreased in all intermediate and high-risk vignettes (p < 0.01).

PTEN-induced kinase 1 gene single-nucleotide variants as biomarkers in adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Fluoropyrimidine-based postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is globally recommended for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy is often associated with severe adverse events and is not highly effective in preventing recurrence. Therefore, discovery of novel molecular biomarkers of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy to identify patients at increased risk of recurrent colorectal cancer is warranted. Autophagy (including mitophagy) is activated under chemotherapy-induced stress and contributes to chemotherapy resistance. Expression of autophagy-related genes and their single-nucleotide polymorphisms are reported to be effective predictors of chemotherapy response in some cancers. Our goal was to evaluate the relationship between single-nucleotide variants of autophagy-related genes and recurrence rates in order to identify novel biomarkers that predict the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed surgical or biopsy specimens from 84 patients who underwent radical surgery followed by fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center between January and December 2016. Using targeted enrichment sequencing, we identified single-nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions in 50 genes, including autophagy-related genes, and examined their association with colorectal cancer recurrence rates.

RESULTS

We detected 560 single-nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions in the target region. The results of Fisher's exact test indicated that the recurrence rate of colorectal cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly lower in patients with the single-nucleotide variants (c.1018G > A [p < 0.005] or c.1562A > C [p < 0.01]) of the mitophagy-related gene PTEN-induced kinase 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The two single-nucleotide variants of PINK1 gene may be biomarkers of non-recurrence in colorectal cancer patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected duodenal adenocarcinoma: a case-matched analysis in nation wide cohort

BACKGROUND

Duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA) is a rare tumor for which survival data on adjuvant chemotherapy in patients after surgical treatment are unclear. This case-matched study in a nationwide cohort aims to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable DA on overall survival.

METHODS

All patients diagnosed with DA and intestinal type periampullary adenocarcinoma (PVA) in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2015 were included (n = 1316). Patients with disease stages II and III who underwent resection and adjuvant chemotherapy were matched (1:2), based on identified covariates associated with OS, with patients who underwent surgery alone. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates.

RESULTS

The median OS was 49.9 months in patients who underwent curative resection (n = 649). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed a significant influence of age, lymph node involvement, and T- stage on survival. The group of patients receiving adjuvant treatment consisted of 43 patients and the non-adjuvant group of 83 case-matched patients. The median OS of the complete matched cohort (n = 126) was 26.9 months. No statistically significant survival benefit was found for the adjuvant group as compared to the group treated with surgery alone (median OS = 34.4 months and 23.0 months, p = 0.20).

CONCLUSION

This population-based, case-matched analysis demonstrates no statistically significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in stages II and III patients. Future studies with specified treatment regimens as well as thorough stratification for prognostic factors will be required in order to more definitively determine the role of adjuvant therapy.

Real-world analysis of survival benefit of surgery and adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer

Treatment guidelines for colorectal cancer (CRC) in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether elderly patients (≥ 70 years) with CRC benefit from surgery and adjuvant therapy. A total of 90,347 eligible CRC patients older than 70 years were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and divided into a surgery group and a no-surgery group. After being matched by propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 23,930 patients were included in our analysis. The Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test were applied to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were utilized to confirm independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. In age-stratified analysis (70-74; 75-79; 80-84; ≥ 85), the OS and CSS rates of patients in the surgery group were significantly higher than those of patients in the no-surgery group (all P < 0.001). Adjuvant therapy was an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS in elderly patients with CRC (all P < 0.001). Further analysis showed that elderly colon cancer patients with stage III and stage IV disease gained a survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy can significantly improve OS and CSS in elderly rectal cancer patients with stage II, III, and IV disease. In conclusion, among CRC patients aged ≥ 70 years reported in the SEER database, treatment with surgical resection is significantly associated with improved OS and CSS. Moreover, adjuvant therapy led to a significant prognostic advantage for elderly advanced CRC patients who underwent surgery.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term overall survival in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on long-term survival in unselected patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer including an analysis of each high-risk feature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, the National Patient Registry and the Danish Pathology Registry from 2014 to 2018 were merged. Patients surviving > 90 days were included. High-risk features were defined as emergency presentation, including self-expanding metal stents (SEMS)/loop-ostomy as a bridge to resection, grade B or C anastomotic leakage, pT4 tumors, lymph node yield < 12 or signet cell carcinoma. Eligibility criteria for chemotherapy were age < 75 years, proficient MMR gene expression, and performance status ≤ 2. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients allocated for adjuvant chemotherapy and the time to first administration.

RESULTS

In total 939 of 3937 patients with stage II colon cancer had high-risk features, of whom 408 were eligible for chemotherapy. 201 (49.3%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, with a median time to first administration of 35 days after surgery. The crude 5-year overall survival was 84.9% in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 66.3% in patients not receiving chemotherapy, p < 0.001. This association corresponded to an absolute risk difference of 14%.

CONCLUSION

5-year overall survival was significantly higher in patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with no chemotherapy. Adjuvant treatment was given to less than half of the patients who were eligible for it.

Factors Associated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy Noncompliance and Survival in Older Adults With Stage III Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard management of stage III colon cancer includes surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite improved overall survival with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer, it is reportedly underused in older adults. To date, no contemporary national analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy use and its impact on older adults with stage III colon cancer exists.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the current use of adjuvant chemotherapy in older adults with stage III colon cancer and determine factors associated with noncompliance.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

Conducted using the National Cancer Database.

PATIENTS

This study included patients aged 65 years and older undergoing curative resection for stage III colon adenocarcinomas, 2010-2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adjuvant chemotherapy use, factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy use, and overall survival with and without adjuvant chemotherapy in older adults with pathologic stage III disease.

RESULTS

Of 64,608 patients included, 64.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly independently associated with improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (92.8%, 75.3%, 62.4% vs 70.8%, 46.6%, 32.7%; HR 0.475; 95% CI, 0.459-0.492; p <0.001). Compared with the no adjuvant chemotherapy cohort, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were younger, female, and less comorbid ( p < 0.001). Factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy noncompliance included advancing age, lower annual income, open approach, longer length of stay, pathologic stage IIIA, and fewer than 12 lymph nodes.

LIMITATIONS

Administrative data source with inherent risks of bias, coding errors, and limitations in the fields available for analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival but was only used in 64.3% of older adults with stage III colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy noncompliance was seen in the most vulnerable and highest-risk patients, including those with greater comorbidity, lower income, and patients who received open surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C125 .

FACTORES ASOCIADOS CON EL INCUMPLIMIENTO DE LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE Y LA SUPERVIVENCIA EN ADULTOS MAYORES CON CNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO III

ANTECEDENTES: El tratamiento estándar de oro del cáncer de colon en estadio III incluye la resección quirúrgica y la quimioterapia adyuvante. A pesar de la mejora de la supervivencia general con la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon en estadio III, se reporta que se utiliza poco en los adultos mayores. Hasta la fecha, no existe ningún análisis nacional actual, sobre el uso de quimioterapia adyuvante y su impacto en adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en etapa III.OBJETIVO: Evaluar el uso actual de quimioterapia adyuvante en adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en estadio III y determinar los factores asociados con el incumplimiento.DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTES: Realizado y utilizando la Base de Datos Nacional de Cáncer.PACIENTES: Pacientes de 65 años o más sometidos a resección curativa por adenocarcinomas de colon en estadio III de 2010-2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Uso de quimioterapia adyuvante, factores asociados con el uso de quimioterapia adyuvante y supervivencia general con y sin quimioterapia adyuvante en adultos mayores con enfermedad en estadio patológico III.RESULTADOS: De 64.608 pacientes incluidos, el 64,3% recibió quimioterapia adyuvante. La quimioterapia adyuvante se asoció de forma significativa e independiente con una mejor supervivencia general a 1, 3 y 5 años frente a ninguna quimioterapia adyuvante (92,8 %, 75,3 %, 62,4 % frente a 70,8 %, 46,6 %, 32,7 %; respectivamente, HR 0,475, 95 % IC 0,459-0,492, p < 0,001). En comparación con la cohorte sin quimioterapia adyuvante, los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante eran más jóvenes, mujeres y con menos comorbilidad. (p < 0,001). Los factores asociados con el incumplimiento de la quimioterapia adyuvante incluyeron edad avanzada (OR 0,857, IC del 95 % 0,854-0,861), ingresos anuales más bajos (OR 0,891, IC del 95 % 0,844-0,940), abordaje abierto (0,730, IC del 95 % 0,633-0,842), mayor duración de la estancia (OR 0,949, IC 95% 0,949-0,954) y estadio patológico IIIA (0,547, IC 95% 0,458-0,652) y <12.LIMITACIONES: Fuente de datos administrativos con riesgos inherentes de sesgo, errores de codificación y limitaciones en los campos disponibles para el análisis.CONCLUSIONES: La quimioterapia adyuvante mejoró significativamente la supervivencia general, pero solo se utilizó en el 64,3 % de los adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en estadio III. El incumplimiento de la quimioterapia adyuvante se observó en los pacientes más vulnerables y de mayor riesgo, incluidos aquellos con mayor comorbilidad, menores ingresos y pacientes que recibieron cirugía abierta. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C125 . (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).

The Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Population Aged 75 Years and Older with Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multi-Center Cohort Study

Background

It is common for elderly patients to be underrepresented in clinical trials for cancer, which can result in a lack of efficacy data and unclear criteria to guide treatment decisions for clinical doctors. Therefore, one of the common challenges in oncology treatment is determining the extent to which patients aged 75 and older have benefited from postoperative chemotherapy.

Purpose

The study aimed to explore the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) after curative resection in patients aged 75 years and older with stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods

The retrospective cohort analysis was performed on patients with stage II-III CRC who received curative resection at three cancer centers in China between 2008 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier curves and Multivariable Cox regression models were used to analyze the impact of AC on RFS in patients. Finally, propensity-score matching was used to reduce selection bias and confounding factors in patients aged 75 years and older with stage II-III CRC.

Results

A total of 2885 patients were included (1729 (59.9%) male; 1312 (61.5%) received AC). The pre-matching cohort was comprised of 151 patients aged 75 years and older (median age (IQR)77.00 (76.00, 79.00); 97 (64.2%) male, 51 (72.9%) received AC). Age (P=0.001), postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)(P=0.02) level were associated with prognosis. But AC was not associated with 3-year RFS (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.80-2.0; log-rank P=0.37). After a predisposition 1: 1 match (with or without AC, n = 42), AC remains uncorrelated with 3-year RFS (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.52-3.70; log-rank P=0.66).

Conclusion

Patients over the age of 75 with stage II-III CRC who receive AC or do not face the same risk of postoperative recurrence. As a result, patients with stage II-III postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can make an informed decision regarding whether they want to undergo chemotherapy based on their age and reduce the unnecessary side effects of chemotherapy.

Guidance for Treating the Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The need for evidence-based data in the rapidly growing group of older patients is vast and more elderly-specific studies are desperately needed, for which there is clear demand from both patients and providers. Notably, many of the studies discussed in this review included unplanned subset analyses based on age and/or were not originally stratified by age; therefore, these data, particularly overall survival data, need to be interpreted with some caution as they may not be statistically valid based on the initial trial design and statistical plan. As we await data from ongoing elderly-specific trials, our recommendation for managing older patients with CRC should include geriatric screening tools (e.g., CSGA, VES-13, G8, CARG, CRASH) to help guide treatment adjustments for improved tolerability without sacrificing efficacy. For patients with a positive screen for significant geriatric concerns, a full geriatric assessment is recommended to guide treatment approach and supportive care. Prior data support the use of all approved medications for CRC in older adults who are fit; however, treatment breaks and dose attenuation with potential escalation are reasonable options for these patients. Ultimately, management decisions in the care of older adults with mCRC must be made through shared decision-making with the patient with consideration for the patient's functional status, comorbidities, goals of care, social support, as well as potential toxicities and possible effect on QoL.

A prospective feasibility study of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients aged ≥ 80 years after curative resection of colorectal cancer, the HiSCO-03 study

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on the safety and effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) aged ≥ 80 years. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional phase II study of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin (UFT/LV) as adjuvant chemotherapy in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III CRC aged ≥ 80 years who underwent curative resection were enrolled. Eligible patients received UFT/LV therapy (UFT, 300 mg/m² per day as tegafur; LV, 75 mg/day on days 1-28, every 35 days for five courses). Primary endpoint was feasibility, and secondary endpoints were safety and relative dose intensity.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2021. Of the 69 patients, 65 were included in the analysis. There were 32 males and 33 females with a median age of 82 years (range 80-88 years). In the primary endpoint, administration completion rate was 67.3% (95% confidence interval 54.9-77.6%), and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was below the threshold of 60%. 21 patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (AEs) and refused treatment. The median relative dose intensities were 84% (range 4-100%) for UFT, and 100% (range 4-100%) for LV. Incidence of grade three or higher AEs were neutropenia (1.5%), aspartate transaminase elevation (3%), alanine transaminase elevation (1.5%), oral mucositis (3%), anemia (1.5%), and diarrhea (4.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The indications for adjuvant UFT/LV therapy for elderly CRC aged ≥ 80 years were considered limited. It is necessary to clarify the background of patients in whom drug administration is discontinued and investigate their impact on long-term prognosis.

FOxTROT2: innovative trial design to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treating locally advanced colon cancer in older adults or those with frailty

Treating older adults with cancer is increasingly important in modern oncology practice. However, we currently lack the high-quality evidence needed to guide optimal management of this heterogeneous group. Principally, historic under-recruitment of older adults to clinical trials limits our understanding of how existing evidence can be applied to this group. Such uncertainty is particularly prevalent in the management of colon cancer (CC). With CC being most common in older adults, many patients also suffer from frailty, which is recognised as being strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes. Conducting clinical trials in older adults presents several major challenges, many of which impact the clinical relevance of results to a real-world population. When considering this heterogeneous group, it may be difficult to define the target population, recruit participants effectively, choose an appropriate trial design, and ensure participants remain engaged with the trial during follow-up. Furthermore, after overcoming these challenges, clinical trials tend to enrol highly selected patient cohorts that comprise only the fittest older patients, which are not representative of the wider population. FOxTROT1 was the first phase III randomised controlled trial to illustrate the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the treatment of CC. Patients receiving NAC had greater 2-year disease-free survival compared to those proceeding straight to surgery. Outcomes for older adults in FOxTROT1 were similarly impressive when compared to their younger counterparts. Yet, this group inevitably represents a fitter subgroup of the older patient population. FOxTROT2 has been designed to investigate NAC in a full range of older adults with CC, including those with frailty. In this review, we describe the key challenges to conducting a robust clinical trial in this heterogeneous patient group, highlight our strategies for overcoming these challenges in FOxTROT2, and explain how we hope to provide clarity on the optimal treatment of CC in older adults.

Clinicopathological Features and Oncological Outcomes of Early and Late Recurrence in Stage III Colorectal Cancer Patients after Adjuvant Oxaliplatin-Based Therapy

AIMS

An adjuvant oxaliplatin-based regimen is the standard of care for patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). Few reports have compared the clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes of such treatment between patients with early (≤1 year) and late recurrence (>1 year).

METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2019, CRC recurred in 128 (24.1%) of 531 patients with consecutive stage III CRC after they received curative resection and an adjuvant oxaliplatin-based regimen. The clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes of the 128 patients were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period after the first chemotherapy cycle was 35.0 months (range, 7-100.9), and the median recurrence time was 16.1 months. Forty-seven patients (36.7%) had an early recurrence and eighty-one patients (63.3%) had a late recurrence. Compared with patients with late recurrence, those with early recurrence were mostly younger (median: 58 vs. 64 years, p=0.009), had less oxaliplatin-based therapy cycles (median: 8 vs. 12 cycles, p < 0.001), and had a shorter overall survival time (median: 23.3 vs. 39.7 months, p < 0.001). The area under the curve of patient age and chemotherapy cycles for predicting early recurrence was 0.629 and 0.705 (p=0.015 and p < 0.001), respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the cutoff level for patient age was 57 years and the number of chemotherapy cycles was 8. A multivariate analysis revealed that patient age ≤57 years and oxaliplatin-based therapy ≤8 cycles were independent risk factors for early recurrence (odds ratio (OR) = 3.049, p=0.022; OR = 4.995, p=0.002). These factors were associated with an approximately 77.8% risk of recurrence within 1 year, compared with the 21.5% risk associated with patient age >57 years and oxaliplatin-based therapy >8 cycles (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Patients with early recurrence had poorer survival than those with late recurrence. If >8 cycles of oxaliplatin-based therapy can be administered without disease progression, then patients with stage III CRC would have a lower risk of early recurrence.

Trends in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use Among Stage III Colon Cancer in Non-Elderly and Low Comorbidity Patients

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer is underutilized in the United States. The aim of this study was to assess the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in younger and medically fit patients and analyze the socioeconomic factors associated with its utilization.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015, we selected stage III colon cancer patients between age 18 to 65, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CDCI) of 0 or 1, and those that survived at least 12 months after surgery. We then compared patients that underwent surgery only with those that received adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with adjuvant chemotherapy use in the population. Overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Of the 48,336 patients that met inclusion criteria, 43,315 (90%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. The utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy increased from 87% in 2004 to 91% in 2015. On multivariable regression analysis, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was lower among males, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics, low-grade cancer, left-sided tumors, CDCI 1, those who travel ≥ 50 miles, yearly income < $40,227, and uninsured patients. The most common reason for the omission of adjuvant chemotherapy was the patient or caregiver's choice (40% between 2013 and 2015). The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 76.7% and 63.8% respectively, in those who received adjuvant chemotherapy as compared to 65.1% and 49.3% in those who underwent surgery only (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In young and medically fit stage III colon cancer patients, most patients received guideline-compliant care in the United States. However, socioeconomic disparities adversely impacted the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient or caregiver's decision was the most common reason for non-adherence to adjuvant chemotherapy and lead to poor survival outcomes. Emphasis should be placed on developing patient-centered strategies to improve adherence to chemotherapy in all patients.

Effects of deficient mismatch repair on the prognosis of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer during different postoperative periods

Background

We evaluated the prognostic role of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) systems in stage II and stage III colon cancer patients during different postoperative periods. We also assessed whether patients aged ≥75 could benefit from chemotherapy.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted across three medical centers in China. Kaplan–Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce imbalances in the baseline characteristics of the patients. Landmark analysis was performed to evaluate the role of dMMR during different postoperative periods.

Results

The median follow-up time for all patients was 45.0 months (25–75 IQR: 38.0–82.5). There was no significant OS (p = 0.350) or DFS (p = 0.752) benefit associated with dMMR for stage II and III patients during the first postoperative year. However, significant OS (p < 0.001) and DFS (p < 0.001) benefits were observed from the second postoperative year until the end of follow-up. These differences remained after propensity score matching. Moreover, chemotherapy produced no OS (HR = 0.761, 95% CI: 0.43–1.34, p = 0.341) or DFS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.51–1.88, p = 0.961) benefit for patients aged ≥75 years.

Conclusion

The benefits of dMMR in stage III patients were observed from the second postoperative year until the end of follow-up. However, the prognosis of patients with dMMR is not different from that of patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) during the first postoperative year. In addition, elderly patients aged ≥75 years obtained no significant survival benefits from postoperative chemotherapy.

Age Determines Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Resected Stage II Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage II colon cancer remains controversial. Treatment recommendations rely largely on the presence of certain high-risk features for recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define patient and clinicopathologic differences between early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer and determine whether these differences impact treatment. We hypothesized that high-risk features in stage II colorectal cancer differed between age groups and would most strongly influence administration of adjuvant chemotherapy.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a Commission on Cancer designated hospital as well as the National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program.

PATIENTS

Patients with resected stage II colon cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database, and clinicopathologic characteristics were recorded. Patients were stratified into young (≤45), middle-aged (50-75), and older (>75) age groups.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of high-risk clinicopathologic features and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 14,966 patients met inclusion criteria. Young patients were found to have had at least one high-risk feature ( n = 489, 44%) slightly more often than both middle-aged ( n = 3734, 40%) and older patients ( n = 1890, 42%). A total of 332 (7%) older patients received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 627 (56%) young patients and 2854 (30%) middle-aged patients. Age group was independently associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy when controlling for relevant clinicopathologic factors.

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study without granular detail on treatment decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Young patients are frequently prescribed adjuvant chemotherapy for both high- and low-risk tumors despite questionable benefit in the latter. Older patients rarely receive adjuvant therapy. Both medical and surgical oncologists should be aware of disparities in cancer treatment and remain conscientious about making treatment decisions solely based on age. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 .

LA EDAD DETERMINA EL USO DE QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN EL CNCER DE COLON RESECADO EN ESTADIO II

ANTECEDENTES:El papel de la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II sigue siendo controversial . Las recobmendaciones para el tratamiento dependen en gran medida de la presencia de ciertas características de alto riesgo de recurrencia.OBJETIVO:Buscamos definir las diferencias clínico-patológicas del paciente entre el CCR de inicio temprano y tardío; y determinar si estas diferencias afectan el tratamiento. Hipotetizamos que las características de alto riesgo del cáncer colorrectal en estadio II difieren entre los grupos de edad y que influyen fuertemente en la administración de quimioterapia adyuvante.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio se llevó a cabo en un hospital designado por la Comisión sobre el Cáncer, así como el Programa de Investigación Intramural del Instituto Nacional del Cáncer.PACIENTES:Se identificaron los pacientes con cáncer de colon resecado en estadio II en la Base de datos nacional del cáncer y se registraron las características clínico-patológicas. Los pacientes se estratificaron en grupos de edad jóvenes (≤45), de mediana edad (50-75) y mayores (> 75).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se estudiaron la incidencia de las características clínico-patológicas de alto riesgo y la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante.RESULTADOS:Un total de 14.966 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Se encontró que los pacientes jóvenes tenían al menos una característica de alto riesgo (n = 489, 44%) un poco más frecuente que los pacientes de mediana edad (n = 3734, 40%) y los pacientes mayores (n = 1890, 42%). Un total de 332 (7%) de los pacientes mayores recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante en comparación con 627 (56%) de los pacientes jóvenes y 2854 (30%) de los pacientes de mediana edad. El grupo de edad se asoció de forma independiente con la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante al controlar los factores clínico-patológicos relevantes.LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio retrospectivo sin detalles granulares sobre las decisiones de tratamiento.CONCLUSIONES:A los pacientes jóvenes se les prescribe con frecuencia quimioterapia adyuvante para tumores de alto y bajo riesgo, a pesar de los cuestionables beneficios en estos últimos. Los pacientes de edad avanzada rara vez reciben terapia adyuvante. Tanto los oncólogos clínicos como los quirúrgicos deben ser conscientes de las disparidades en el tratamiento del cáncer y ser conscientes de tomar decisiones de tratamiento basadas únicamente en la edad. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B846 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Recurrence-free survival versus overall survival as a primary endpoint for studies of resected colorectal liver metastasis: a retrospective study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recurrence-free survival has been used as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in trials involving patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. We aimed to assess the correlation between recurrence-free survival and overall survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases to determine the adequacy of this surrogate endpoint.

METHODS

In this retrospective study and meta-analysis, we compiled an institutional cohort of consecutive patients who had complete resection of colorectal liver metastases from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY, USA) prospective database. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18 years or older, and underwent hepatectomy, with or without operative ablation, between Jan 1, 1991, and April 30, 2019. We estimated overall survival and recurrence-free survival probabilities at various timepoints using the Kaplan-Meier method, and we assessed pairwise associations between these endpoints using Spearman's rank correlation. We also did a meta-analysis of adjuvant phase 3 clinical trials for colorectal liver metastases to assess the correlation between hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence-free survival and overall survival. We searched MEDLINE for articles of phase 3 randomised controlled trials analysing adjuvant treatment strategies for resected colorectal metastases from database inception to Jan 1, 2022. The titles and abstracts of identified studies were screened before full-text screening and summary data were either recalculated or extracted manually from the published Kaplan-Meier curves (depending on data availability).

FINDINGS

Data were available for 3299 patients in the institutional database, of whom 2983 were eligible for inclusion in our cohort. Median follow-up was 8·4 years (95% CI 7·9-9·1) , during which time there were 1995 (67%) disease recurrences and 1684 (56%) deaths. Median recurrence-free survival was 1·3 years (95% CI 1·3-1·4) and median overall survival was 5·2 years (95% CI 5·0-5·5). 1428 (85%) of 1684 deaths were preceded by recurrence, and median time from recurrence to death was 2·0 years (IQR 1·0-3·4). Pairwise correlations between recurrence-free survival and overall survival were low to moderate, with a correlation estimate ranging from 0·30 (SD 0·17) to 0·56 (0·13). In the meta-analysis of adjuvant clinical trials, the Spearman's correlation coefficient between recurrence-free survival HR and overall survival HR was r=0·20 (p=0·71).

INTERPRETATION

We found a minimal correlation between recurrence-free survival and overall survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Recurrence-free survival is an inadequate surrogate endpoint for overall survival in this disease setting.

FUNDING

US National Cancer Institute.

Preliminary tolerance analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients after resection of stage III colon cancer from the PRODIGE 34-FFCD randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Colon adenocarcinoma mainly occurs in older patients. Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival after stage III colon cancer resection, but this improvement was not demonstrated in older patients.

METHODS

The purpose of ADAGE-PRODIGE 34, randomized open phase III trial is to compare in patients over 70 years oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine with fluoropyrimidine alone in fit patients (Group 1) and fluoropyrimidine with observation in frail patients (Group 2) after resection of stage III colon adenocarcinoma. We report a preliminary tolerance analysis on 50% of the first patients enrolled.

RESULTS

The analysis was conducted on 491 patients (378 in Group 1 and 113 in Group 2). Patients in Group 2 were older and showed more frailty criteria than those in Group 1. Cumulative grade 3-5 toxicities were more frequent in patients treated with oxaliplatin in Group 1 or with fluoropyrimidine in Group 2 than in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine in Group 1. At least one course was deferred in more than half of the patients in all groups. Early treatment cessation was more frequent in Group 2.

CONCLUSION

No safety concerns were raised for the continuation of accrual. The frailty criteria distribution suggests that the investigator's evaluation for group allocation was accurate.

Predicting the Risks of Aggressive-Intent Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Patients With Lymphoma: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Lymphoma is a disease of older patients and while treatment is subtype specific, curative or aggressive intent combination chemotherapy is often recommended. However, there has been limited evidence on which to base treatment decisions for older adults. Our objectives were to assess the utility of risk stratification measures and serial functional tests in predicting chemotherapy toxicity and as well the feasibility of conducting these in older adults undergoing chemotherapy for lymphoproliferative disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective cohort study recruited lymphoma patients 70 years or older planned for systemic chemotherapy. The Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) risk stratification tool and Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) were calculated at baseline. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Charlson Comorbidity Index score, grip strength and gait speed test, and toxicity events, were assessed at baseline and serially throughout treatment. Sarcopenia was calculated on CT scans at baseline, midway through treatment, and 1-month after completion of therapy. The primary endpoint was to assess the feasibility of applying these measures in busy ambulatory clinics. These measures were also correlated with clinical outcomes including ≥grade 3 adverse events (AEs), hospitalizations and emergency department visits, dose changes or delays, and overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 30 patients were enrolled (mean age 78.1 ± 6.4 years), of whom 20 were treated with curative intent. A total of 16 patients (53%) experienced grade ≥3 AEs, 9 (56%) of which led to a chemotherapy delay. On univariable analyses, CFS score, a high CARG score, medium to high CRASH score, and the gait speed were associated with grade ≥3 AEs, while only CFS remained significant on multivariable analysis. On univariable analysis, patients with a medium to high risk CRASH score were more likely than low risk patients to have an unplanned emergency department visit or hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The CFS seems to predict toxicity in this cohort study, with gait speed, CARG and CRASH scores being potentially additional predictive methods of evaluation.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefit in Elderly Stage II/III Colon Cancer Patients

Background

Studies providing more evidence to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in elderly colon cancer patients are expected.

Methods

We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2012. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to calculate the cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate, and comparisons of survival difference between different subgroups were performed using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were carried out to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of different clinicopathological characteristics.

Results

In stage II colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 5-year CSS rates of no chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups were 82.0% and 72.4%, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). In stage III colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 5-year CSS rates of no chemotherapy and chemotherapy groups were 50.7% and 61.3%, respectively (P &lt; 0.001). Patients with chemotherapy receipt were independently associated with a 35.8% lower cancer-specific mortality rate (HR = 0.642, 95% CI: 0.620-0.665, P &lt; 0.001) compared with those who did not receive chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered during the treatment of stage III colon cancer patients aged 70 years or older, but the chemotherapy benefit in elderly stage II colon cancer is suboptimal.

Patient, provider, and hospital factors associated with oral anti-neoplastic agent initiation and adherence in older patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Oral anti-neoplastic agents (OAAs) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are associated with increased cancer-specific survival. However, racial disparities in survival persist and older adults have the lowest rates of cancer-specific survival. Research from other cancers demonstrates specialty access is associated with high-quality cancer care, but older adults receive cancer treatment less often than younger adults. We therefore examined whether patient, provider, and hospital characteristics were associated with OAA initiation, adherence, and cancer-specific survival after initiation and whether race, ethnicity, and/or age was associated with an increased likelihood of seeing a medical oncologist for diagnosis of mRCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)Medicare data to identify patients ≥65 years of age who were diagnosed with mRCC from 2007 to 2015 and enrolled in Medicare Part D. Insurance claims were used to identify receipt of OAAs within twelve months of metastatic diagnosis, calculate proportion of days covered, and to identify the primary cancer provider and hospital. We examined provider and hospital characteristics associated with OAA initiation, adherence, and all-cause mortality after OAA initiation.

RESULTS

We identified 2792 patients who met inclusion criteria. Increased OAA initiation was associated with access to a medical oncologist. Patients were less likely to begin OAA treatment if their primary oncologic provider was a urologist (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.77). Provider/hospital characteristics were not associated with differences in OAA adherence or mortality. Patients who started sorafenib (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; 95% CI 0.29-0.86), were older (aged >81 OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34-0.92), and those living in high poverty ZIP codes (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.29-0.80) were less likely to adhere to OAA treatment. Furthermore, provider characteristics did not account for differences in mortality once an OAA was initiated. Last, only age > 81 years was statistically and clinically associated with a decreased relative risk of seeing a medical oncologist (risk ratio [RR] 0.87; CI 0.82-0.92).

CONCLUSION

Provider/hospital factors, specifically, being seen by a medical oncologist for mRCC diagnosis, are associated with OAA initiation. Older patients were less likely to see a medical oncologist; however, race and/or ethnicity was not associated with differences in seeing a medical oncologist. Patient factors are more critical to OAA adherence and mortality after OAA initiation than provider/hospital factors.

Cancer and aging: A call to action

Background

The intersection of cancer and aging is an emerging public health challenge in developed countries because of the aging and expansion of the population.

Aims

We convened a panel of experts to share their insights on this topic at the inaugural University of Florida Health Cancer Center's (UFHCC's) Cancer and Aging Symposium, which was held virtually in February 2022.

Methods

We featured presentations from four leading scientists, whose research spans multiple disciplines including basic science, translational research, geriatric oncology, and population science.

Results

Each speaker offered their unique perspective and insight on the intersection between cancer and aging and discussed their current and ongoing research in this field. In addition to this panel of experts, scientists from the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute, as well as a UFHCC-affiliated citizen scientist, shared their perspectives on strategies to move the field forward. Some of the key open questions and opportunities for future research offered by these presenters in aging and cancer include but are not limited to infusing health disparities research into the field of cancer and aging, assessing the value of geriatric assessment in identifying early vulnerabilities that may affect response to emerging cancer therapies in older patients, and assessing biological age and other biomarkers (e.g., clonal hematopoiesis) in relation to clinical endpoints and the development of primary, secondary, and tertiary cancer prevention interventions.

Conclusion

Research is needed to accelerate knowledge regarding the dynamic interplay of cancer and aging and optimize care in diverse older adults to achieve equity in cancer outcomes.

Effect of oxaliplatin in elderly colon cancer patients with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using fluoro-pyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FU + oxaliplatin) is recommended after curative resection for locally advanced colon cancer patients, several randomized controlled trials have shown no additional effect of oxaliplatin in patients aged ≥ 70 years. Here, we examined the effectiveness of FU + oxaliplatin on the long-term outcome of old patients with a high risk of recurrence.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included 346 colon cancer patients diagnosed with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease from 2016 to 2020. They were divided into an old group (≥ 70 years, n = 197) and a young group (< 70 years, n = 167). Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias, and 126 patients per group were matched.

RESULTS

Before matching, the rates of poor performance status (p < 0.001) and the presence of comorbidities (76.1% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001) were higher in the old group. Although all baseline factors were similar between groups, after matching, the AC rate was lower in the old group (45.2% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.002). In the old group, relapse-free (82.2% vs. 55.6% and 69.6%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (83.1% vs. 80.0% and 44.4%, p < 0.05) rates were significantly higher in the AC patients with FU + oxaliplatin than in the AC patients with only FU and the non-AC patients.

CONCLUSION

The selected old colon cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence gained an additional benefit with respect to prognosis from FU + oxaliplatin as AC.

KCNQ1 and lymphovascular invasion are key features in a prognostic classifier for stage II and III colon cancer

Background

The risk of recurrence after resection of a stage II or III colon cancer, and therefore qualification for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), is traditionally based on clinicopathological parameters. However, the parameters used in clinical practice are not able to accurately identify all patients with or without minimal residual disease. Some patients considered ‘low-risk’ do develop recurrence (undertreatment), whilst other patients receiving ACT might not have developed recurrence at all (overtreatment). We previously analysed tumour tissue expression of 28 protein biomarkers that might improve identification of patients at risk of recurrence. In the present study we aimed to build a prognostic classifier based on these 28 biomarkers and clinicopathological parameters.

Methods

Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to build a prognostic classifier based on a well described cohort of 386 patients with stage II and III colon cancer. Separate classifiers were built for patients who were or were not treated with ACT. Routine clinicopathological parameters and tumour tissue immunohistochemistry data were included, available for 28 proteins previously published. Classification trees were pruned until lowest misclassification error was obtained. Survival of the identified subgroups was analysed, and robustness of the selected CART variables was assessed by random forest analysis (1000 trees).

Results

In patients not treated with ACT, prognosis was estimated best based on expression of KCNQ1. Poor disease-free survival (DFS) was observed in those with loss of expression of KCNQ1 (HR = 3.38 (95% CI 2.12 – 5.40); p < 0.001). In patients treated with ACT, key prognostic factors were lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and expression of KCNQ1. Patients with LVI showed poorest DFS, whilst patients without LVI and high expression of KCNQ1 showed most favourable survival (HR = 7.50 (95% CI 3.57—15.74); p < 0.001). Patients without LVI and loss of expression of KCNQ1 had intermediate survival (HR = 3.91 (95% CI 1.76 – 8.72); p = 0.001).

Conclusion

KCNQ1 and LVI were identified as key features in prognostic classifiers for disease-free survival in stage II and III colon cancer patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09473-9.

Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in elderly patients with colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are frequently excluded from randomized trials. It is unclear if adjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes of colorectal cancer in such patients. The current study aimed to review evidence on the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in elderly patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer by pooling data from real-world studies.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases were searched for observational studies reporting adjusted data on OS and DFS in elderly (≥70 years) colorectal cancer patients based on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies included. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant improved OS in elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.00001). Results were similar for sub-group analysis based on cancer stage and definition of elderly. Improvement in OS was noted in only Western population studies with no difference in Asian patients. The meta-analysis also revealed no statistically significant difference in DFS in elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery alone (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Real-world evidence indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS but not DFS in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Scarce evidence suggests a limited role of adjuvant chemotherapy in Asian patients which needs confirmation by further studies.

Management of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Elderly Patients

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is one of the most difficult cancers in the head and neck region due to the complex geometry of the tumour and the surrounding critical organs. High-dose radical radiotherapy with or without concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy is the primary treatment modality. Around 10%–15% of NPC patients have their diagnosis at age after 70. The management of NPC in elderly patients is particularly challenging as they encompass a broad range of patient phenotypes and are often prone to treatment-related toxicities. Chronologic age alone is insufficient to decide on the management plan. Comprehensive geriatric assessment with evaluation on patients’ functional status, mental condition, estimated life expectancy, comorbidities, risks and benefits of the treatment, patients’ preference, and family support is essential. In addition, little data from randomized controlled trials are available to guide treatment decisions in elderly patients with NPC. In deciding which treatment strategy would be suitable for an individual elderly patient, we reviewed the literature and reviewed the analysis of primary studies, reviews, and guidelines on management of NPC. This review also summarises the current evidence for NPC management in elderly adults from early to late stage of disease.

Causes of mortality in elderly UICC stage III colon cancer (CC) patients--Tumor-related death and competing risks from the German AIO colorectal study group Colopredict Plus (CPP) registry

Background

Colon cancer (CC) is a disease of elderly patients (pts.) with a median age of 73 years (yrs.). Lack of data about the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is caused by underrepresentation of this clinically relevant cohort in interventional trials. We analyzed real‐world data from the German CPP registry with regard to a possible benefit of ACT in elderly (70+ yrs.) versus younger pts. (50 to <70 yrs.) taking cause‐specific deaths into account.

Methods

We analyzed the effect of age and ACT on overall survival (OS) and cause‐specific death of stage III pts. using Cox regression.

Results

In total, 1558 pts. were analyzed and follow‐up was 24.6 months. 62.6% of the elderly received ACT whereas 91.1% of younger pts. (p < 0.001). Oxaliplatin combinations were significantly less often given to older than younger pts. (38.8% vs. 88.9%; p < 0.001). Mean Charlson comorbidity score was significantly lower in pts. that received ACT (0.61) than in those without ACT (1.16; p < 0.001). ACT was an independent positive prognostic factor for cancer‐related death in elderly pts. even in pts. 75+ yrs. No significant difference in the effect of ACT could be observed between age groups (interaction: cancer‐specific death HR = 1.7948, p = 0.1079; death of other cause HR = 0.7384, p = 0.6705).

Conclusion

ACT was an independent positive prognostic factor for OS. There may be a cohort of elderly with less co‐morbidities who benefit from ACT.