Randomized comparison of a novel anticoagulant, vasoflux, and heparin as adjunctive therapy to streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction: results of the VITAL study (Vasoflux International Trial for Acute Myocardial Infarction Lysis)

Old and new applications of non-anticoagulant heparin

The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of non-anticoagulant effects of heparins and their potential use in new therapeutic applications. Heparin and heparin derivatives have been tested in inflammatory, pulmonary and reproductive diseases, in cardiovascular, nephro- and neuro-tissue protection and repair, but also as agents against angiogenesis, atheroschlerosis, metastasis, protozoa and viruses. Targeting and inhibition of specific mediators involved in the inflammatory process, promoting some of the above mentioned pathologies, are reported along with recent studies of heparin conjugates and oral delivery systems. Some reports from the institute of the authors, such as those devoted to glycol-split heparins are also included. Among the members and derivatives of this class, several are undergoing clinical trials as antimetastatic and antimalarial agents and for the treatment of labour pain and severe hereditary anaemia. Other heparins, whose therapeutic targets are non-anticoagulant such as nephropathies, retinopathies and cystic fibrosis are also under investigation.

The Future of Anticoagulation

Anticoagulant agents, such as unfractionated heparin and warfarin, have been in use for roughly 50 years. Over the past decade, injectable agents such as low-molecular-weight heparins, pentasaccharide, and direct thrombin inhibitors have been major advances in preventing and treating thrombosis. Despite these somewhat recent additions, there is still enormous potential to improve on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these agents, as well as improve patient outcomes. There are currently a large number of anticoagulant agents (injectable and oral) that could be available for use in the next several years. Many of these new agents have unique mechanisms that may provide practitioners with anticoagulant alternatives. This review gives a detailed analysis of the anticoagulant agents that may add to our armamentarium in the management of thrombosis.

Low molecular weight heparin inhibits plasma thrombin generation via direct targeting of factor IXa: contribution of the serpin-independent mechanism

BACKGROUND

Although heparin possesses multiple mechanisms of action, enhanced factor Xa inhibition by antithrombin is accepted as the predominant therapeutic mechanism. The contribution of FIXa inhibition to heparin activity in human plasma remains incompletely defined.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relevance of FIXa as a therapeutic target for heparins, particularly serpin-independent inhibition of intrinsic tenase (FIXa-FVIIIa) activity.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Thrombin generation was detected by fluorogenic substrate cleavage. The inhibitory potencies (EC(50) s) of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), super-sulfated LMWH (ssLMWH), fondaparinux and unfractionated heparin (UFH) were determined by plotting concentration vs. relative velocity index (ratio ± heparin). Inhibition was compared under FIX-dependent and FIX-independent conditions (0.2 or 4 pm tissue factor [TF], respectively) in normal plasma, and in mock-depleted or antithrombin/FIX-depleted plasma supplemented with recombinant FIX.

RESULTS

UFH and fondaparinux demonstrated similar potency under FIX-dependent and FIX-independent conditions, whereas LMWH (2.9-fold) and ssLMWH (5.1-fold) demonstrated increased potency with limiting TF. UFH (62-fold) and fondaparinux (42-fold) demonstrated markedly increased EC(50) values in antithrombin-depleted plasma, whereas LMWH (9.4-fold) and ssLMWH (two-fold) were less affected, with an EC(50) within the therapeutic range for LMWH. The molecular target for LMWH/ssLMWH was confirmed by supplementing FIX/antithrombin-depleted plasma with 90 nm recombinant FIX possessing mutations in the heparin-binding exosite. Mutated FIX demonstrated resistance to inhibition of thrombin generation by LMWH and ssLMWH that paralleled the effect of these mutations on intrinsic tenase inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic LMWH concentrations inhibit plasma thrombin generation via antithrombin-independent interaction with the FIXa heparin-binding exosite.

Time to reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction. It is time to reduce it!

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Mortality from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction remains high, with most deaths occurring before hospital admission. Despite effective pre- and in-hospital reperfusion strategies becoming standard over the past 2 decades, time-to-admission and time-to-treatment remain prolonged. We reviewed temporal trends in these times in published clinical trials.

METHODS

All major randomized clinical trials reporting on reperfusion strategies for acute myocardial infarction published between 1993 and 2003 were evaluated. Strategies included pre- and in-hospital thrombolysis, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) with or without transfer, and "facilitated" PCI. We generated overall estimates of time-to-admission, time-to-treatment, door-to-balloon (DTB), and door-to-needle (DTN) times and evaluated temporal trends in the length of time-to-admission and time-to-treatment.

RESULTS

In studies that evaluated only in-hospital thrombolysis, the time-to-admission was 149 +/- 45 minutes; the mean time-to-treatment was 181 +/- 29 minutes. In studies that considered only in-hospital pPCI (without transfer), the mean time-to-admission was 153 +/- 41 minutes; the mean time-to-treatment was 234 +/- 43 minutes. In studies that compared in-hospital pPCI with in-hospital thrombolytic therapy, the mean time-to-admission was 155 +/- 47 and 150 +/- 48 minutes, respectively. The DTN time was 65 +/- 10 minutes, whereas DTB time was 81 +/- 39 minutes. In other trials evaluating in-hospital thrombolysis and pPCI with transfer to a referral center, the time-to-admission in subjects treated with thrombolysis (n = 1345) was 127 +/- 32 minutes vs 131 +/- 36 minutes for pPCI (n = 1528). For in-hospital thrombolysis, time-to-treatment was 151 +/- 23 minutes vs 203 +/- 15 minutes for pPCI patients with transfer. The DTN time in the thrombolysis group was 44 +/- 28 minutes as compared with DTB time of 78 +/- 38 minutes in the pPCI group. Throughout the last decade, time-to-admission decreased significantly (P = .02) but time-to-treatment remained unchanged (P = .38) for patients undergoing thrombolysis. In the pPCI arm, time-to-admission remained unchanged (P = .11) but a insignificant trend toward reduction was demonstrated in time-to-treatment (P = .11).

CONCLUSION

Time-to-admission and time-to-treatment for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction are still prolonged. Resources should be directed to early recognition of the acute myocardial infarction, improved utilization of emergency services for transportation, and prehospital diagnosis and triaging. Ambulances equipped with wireless capability to transmit electrocardiograms to the on-call cardiologist seem to be promising tools to achieve earlier diagnosis and triaging with high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

Targeting thrombin – rational drug design from natural mechanisms

It is difficult to overstate the medical importance of the serine protease thrombin. Thrombin is involved in many diverse processes, such as cell signaling and memory, but it is the crucial role that it plays in blood coagulation that commands the interest of the medical community. Thrombosis is the most common cause of death in the industrialized world and, whether through venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction or stroke, ultimately involves the inappropriate activity of thrombin. The number and type of intrinsic and extrinsic natural mechanisms of targeting thrombin that have evolved validate thrombin as an important physiological target, and provide strategies to knock it out. The more we learn about the natural mechanisms that determine thrombin specificity the more likely we are to develop compounds that selectively alter thrombin activity. In this article, we review the natural mechanisms that regulate thrombin activity and novel approaches to inhibit thrombin based on these mechanisms.

Overview of anticoagulant drugs for the future

More efficacious, safer, and easier to use anticoagulants are under development. Multiple agents have been shown to be effective in ex vivo or animal thrombosis models and several have progressed to clinical studies. Investigators have not yet determined if pharmaceuticals that inhibit coagulation factor activity earlier in the cascade (for example, inhibitors of tissue factor/factor VIIa, factor IXa, or Xa) are superior to those that block the cascade at a later point. Orally bioavailable drugs for the long-term treatment of thrombotic disorders, particularly those that do not require monitoring, are needed and are under development. Local delivery of anticoagulants or genes modulating anticoagulant control at sites of increased thrombogenicity, such as in diseased arteries, is a promising treatment modality that may decrease systemic bleeding problems. Much about the initiating pathophysiologic events leading to venous thrombotic disease needs to be elucidated before such local therapy can be tested in the venous vasculature. While awaiting better anticoagulants to become routinely available, we need to improve patient management with existing drugs by instituting anticoagulation clinics, promoting patient self-monitoring, and improving efforts to educate patients and health care providers about the use of anticoagulant drugs.