Terbinafine-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Severe drug eruption from oral terbinafine for mild onychomycosis-A case report from family practice and literature review: "Just an innocent little pill?"

Onychomycosis is the most prevalent nail disease and is frequently encountered in clinical practice. Despite having multiple therapeutic options, of which systemic antifungals are the most effective, treatment is not always mandatory in all patients. Especially when considering systemic treatment, the risk of adverse reactions may outweigh the potential benefits of treatment. In this case report, we present a clinical case of a 49-year-old male patient with a blank past medical history who experienced a severe drug eruption from terbinafine prescribed for mild onychomycosis that required discontinuation of terbinafine, additional evaluation, and treatment of this adverse reaction.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus as a rare complication of disease-modifying therapy administration in multiple sclerosis: case report

BACKGROUND

Teriflunomide, the active metabolite of leflunomide, is a disease-modifying therapy drug used for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), yet the complications associated with this drug remain not fully understood. Here we present the rare case of a 28-year-old female MS patient who developed subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) following teriflunomide treatment. Though SCLE has been reported to be associated with leflunomide, the current report represents the first documented evidence demonstrating SCLE as a potential teriflunomide treatment-related complication. Additionally, a literature review on the leflunomide-induced SCLE was conducted to emphasize the association of SCLE with teriflunomide, specifically amongst the female demographic with a preexisting autoimmune diathesis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 28-year-old female first presented with MS symptoms in the left upper limb along with blurred vision in the left eye. Medical and family histories were unremarkable. The patient exhibited positive serum biomarkers including ANA, Ro/SSA, La/SSB, and Ro-52 antibodies. Relapsing-remitting MS was diagnosed according to the 2017 McDonald's diagnostic criteria, and remission was achieved upon intravenous administration of methylprednisolone followed by teriflunomide sequential therapy. Three months post-teriflunomide treatment, the patient developed multiple facial cutaneous lesions. SCLE was subsequently diagnosed and was attributed to treatment-related complication. Interventions include oral administration of hydroxychloroquine and tofacitinib citrate effectively resolved cutaneous lesions. Discontinuation of hydroxychloroquine and tofacitinib citrate treatment led to recurring SCLE symptoms under continuous teriflunomide treatment. Full remission of facial annular plaques was achieved after re-treatment with hydroxychloroquine and tofacitinib citrate. The patient's clinical condition remained stable in long-term outpatient follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

As teriflunomide has become a standard disease-modifying therapy for MS, the current case report highlights the importance of monitoring treatment-related complications, specifically in relation to SCLE symptoms.

Proton pump inhibitor induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: Clinical characteristics and outcomes

Background

There is a growing literature reporting the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE).

Aims

To compare the clinical characteristics of a cohort of patients with PPI-induced SCLE, their clinical course and treatment with a control group of primary SCLE patients not exposed to PPI.

Methods

We conducted a matched case–control study in a tertiary referral setting at the Louise Coote Lupus Unit. There were 64 SCLE patients: 36 with PPI-induced SCLE and 28 patients with primary SCLE.

Results

Twenty-six patients (72%) had pre-existing SLE in the PPI-induced SCLE group. Lower limb skin lesions were significantly more prevalent in the PPI group ( p < 0.0001). The prevalence of anti-Ro and anti-Ro-52 antibodies was numerically higher in the PPI group (64% and 60%), respectively, compared with 46% and 42% in the primary SCLE group. Peripheral blood eosinophils were normal in all patients in the PPI group. Thirteen patients underwent skin biopsy in the PPI group and 12 had histology in keeping with SCLE. The median time to presentation was 8 months with a median resolution period of 6 weeks. PPIs were stopped in 34 patients, while 2 patients continued treatment for other clinical indications. Twelve patients received concurrent oral corticosteroids. Two patients had severe SCLE in the form of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis requiring critical care admission and were managed with corticosteroids, IV immunoglobulin and/or belimumab.

Conclusion

Lower limb involvement is a pointer to PPI-induced SCLE which is likely a class effect with all PPI.

[Paraneoplastic subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus]

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a subtype of cutaneous lupus erythematosus characterized by high photosensitivity, the occurrence of annular or papulosquamous skin lesions located in body regions exposed to UV light, the presence of anti-Ro/SS‑A antibodies, and mild systemic involvement, such as arthralgia and myalgia. Similar to other subtypes of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, certain trigger factors exist for the development of SCLE, such as exposure to UV light, cigarette smoking and drugs. Rheumatic diseases, such as dermatomyositis, have been known as paraneoplastic syndromes for a long time. In recent years, there has been an accumulation of publications on the association of SCLE with malignant diseases. This article reports the case of a 78-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with the concomitant development of SCLE and gastric carcinoma. In all older patients with SCLE, patients with widespread skin affection outside the UV-exposed body areas or patients with B‑symptoms, the presence of a paraneoplastic SCLE should be considered and appropriate diagnostic steps should be initiated to screen for an associated neoplastic disease.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus induced by drugs - novel insights

Introduction: There is a growing list of drugs implicated in inducing both subacute and chronic forms of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is important to recognize these drugs in order to quickly treat patients with drug induced disease.Areas covered: This paper reviews the current literature describing drugs implicated in causing cutaneous lupus erythematosus. A Pubmed search was used to compile a list of medications implicated up to August 2019. It reviews new classes of drugs identified as causing cutaneous lupus erythematosus, the pathophysiology of the disease process, and current recommendations for treatment of the disease.Expert opinion: Many drugs have been identified as inducing lupus, and many more continue to be described in new reports. Further research is needed to understand this phenomenon, which will aid in the diagnosis and treatment of affected patients.

A Week of Oral Terbinafine Pulse Regimen Every Three Months to Treat all Dermatophyte Onychomycosis

Terbinafine has proved to treat numerous fungal infections, including onychomycosis, successfully. Due to its liver metabolization and dependency on the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex, undesirable drug interaction are highly probable. Additionally to drug interactions, the treatment is long, rising the chances of the appearance of side effects and abandonment. Pharmacokinetic data suggest that terbinafine maintains a fungicidal effect within the nail up to 30 weeks after its last administration, which has aroused the possibility of a pulse therapy to reduce the side effects while treating onychomycosis. This study's goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of three different oral terbinafine regimens in treating onychomycosis due to dermatophytes. Sixty-three patients with onychomycosis were sorted by convenience in three different groups. Patients from group 1 received the conventional terbinafine dose (250 mg per day for 3 months). Group 2 received a monthly week-long pulse-therapy dose (500 mg per day for 7 days a month, for 4 months) and group 3 received a 500 mg/day dose for 7 days every 3 months, totaling four treatments. There were no statistical differences regarding the effectiveness or side effects between the groups. Conclusion: A quarterly terbinafine pulse regimen can be a possible alternative for treating onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes.

Photostability of Terbinafine Under UVA Irradiation: The Effect of UV Absorbers

The photostability of drugs administered topically on unprotected skin is a complex phenomenon that could be connected with the loss of activity or, rather rarely, the occurrence of toxic degradation products. In this study, an in-depth investigation of the photostability of terbinafine, in both solutions and formulations, was conducted, taking into account the presence of UV absorbers such as TiO₂ , ZnO, avobenzone, 3-(4-methylbenzylidene)camphor, octocrylene, benzophenone-1 and benzophenone-2. The clear photocatalytic degradation of terbinafine in ethanol solution was observed in the presence of TiO₂ and/or ZnO. In other cases, terbinafine was stable, with the exception of, in the presence of octocrylene. The presumed degradation products of terbinafine were identified for the first time using LC/MS/MS, and transformation pathways were proposed. In the case of a cream formulation, the percentage of initial terbinafine content was almost unchanged in the presence of the UV absorbers benzophenone-1, benzophenone-2 and 3-(4-methylbenzylidene)camphor. In vitro cytotoxicity risk assessment of terbinafine based on photostability under UVA irradiation was evaluated using the human skin fibroblast BJ (ATCC^® CRL-2522™), and this showed no statistically significant difference in cell viability for all samples analyzed.

Drug-induced Rowell syndrome, a rare and difficult to manage disease: A case report

Rowell syndrome is defined as the association between lupus erythematosus, erythema multiforme-like lesions and characteristic immunological changes including positive tests for rheumatoid factor, speckled antinuclear antibody, positive anti-Ro or anti-La antibodies. The present report presents the case of a 45-year-old female patient who was previously diagnosed in January 2010 with terbinafine-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and was admitted for a skin eruption consisting of erythematous-papular erythema multiforme-like lesions, primarily on the trunk and limbs. The associated symptoms consisted of fatigability, myalgia and gonalgia. In October 2015, the illness reoccurred ~1 week after the initiation of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment. Anti-Ro antibodies, rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibody tests were positive. Given the patient's medical history, clinical manifestations, and laboratory, histopathological and immunofluorescence microscopy findings, a diagnosis of Rowell syndrome was made. Systemic corticosteroids (methylprednisolone; 0.5 mg/kg/day) and immunomodulatory therapy (azathioprine; 50 mg/day) were administered with the associated medication (omeprazole, 20 mg/day; KCl, 1 g/day) and topical dermocorticoids (fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream; 1 application/day), with a favorable outcome. The major diagnostic criteria for Rowell syndrome are the presence of lupus erythematosus (acute, subacute or systemic), erythema multiforme-like lesions and positive testing for antinuclear antibodies. The minor diagnostic criteria for Rowell syndrome are chilblains, the presence of anti-Ro antibodies and positive testing for rheumatoid factor. A diagnosis of Rowell syndrome is made if the patient exhibits all major criteria and at least one minor criterion. The present case met all diagnostic criteria, excluding the presence of chilblains. Notably, in this case there was a co-occurrence of subacute lupus erythematosus and Rowell syndrome lesions, which was drug-induced.

[Terbinafine : Drug-induced lupus erythematodes and triggering of psoriatic skin lesions]

Based on the technical information that oral terbinafine must be used with caution in patients with pre-existing psoriasis or lupus erythematosus, the literature was summarized. Terbinafine belongs to the drugs able to induce subcutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE)-with a relatively high risk. The clinical picture of terbinafine-induced SCLE may be highly variable and can also include erythema exsudativum multiforme-like or bullous lesions. Thus, differentiation of terbinafine-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis may be difficult. Therefore, terbinafine should be prescribed with caution in patients who show light sensitivity, arthralgias, positive antinuclear antibodies or have a history of SLE or SCLE. Case reports include wide-spread, but mostly nonlife-threatening courses, which did not require systemic therapy with steroids or antimalarials in every case. Terbinafine is also able to induce or to aggravate psoriasis. The latency period seems to be rather short (<4 weeks). Terbinafine therefore is not first choice if a systemic therapy with antimycotics is indicated in a patient with psoriasis or psoriatic diathesis. Azole derivatives according to the guidelines may be used as an alternative.

Trigger factors of cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a review of current literature

It is currently believed that autoimmune conditions are triggered and aggravated by a variety of environmental factors such as cigarette smoking, infections, ultraviolet light or chemicals, as well as certain medications and vaccines in genetically susceptible individuals. Recent scientific data have suggested a relevant role of these factors not only in systemic lupus erythematosus, but also in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). A variety of environmental factors have been proposed as initiators and exacerbators of this disease. In this review we focused on those with the most convincing evidence, emphasizing the role of drugs in CLE. Using a combined search strategy of the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases the following trigger factors and/or exacerbators of CLE have been identified and described: drugs, smoking, neoplasms, ultraviolet radiation and radiotherapy. In order to give a practical insight we emphasized the role of drugs from various groups and classes in CLE. We also aimed to present a short clinical profile of patients with lesions induced by various drug classes.

Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Induced by Nifedipine

Background:

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) has been reported to be associated with the use of several drugs, including thiazides, terbinafine, and, rarely, calcium channel blockers.

Objective:

A case of SCLE induced by nifedipine is presented.

Methods and Results:

A 48-year-old white woman developed a papulosquamous and annular eruption in sun-exposed areas during the summer. The patient was taking nifedipine for essential hypertension for four years. Serology showed the presence of antinuclear and anti-Ro/SSA as well as antihistone antibodies. Histopathologic and immunopathologic (granular IgM deposits at the dermoepidermal junction) findings confirmed the diagnosis of SCLE. Nifedipine discontinuation led to rapid improvement with almost complete resolution of skin lesions in one month in the absence of active treatment. Reduction of antinuclear, anti-Ro/SSA, and antihistone antibody levels was documented after six months.

Conclusion:

Nifedipine can cause SCLE after a long period of administration. Antihistone antibodies may be associated with drug-induced SCLE.

Drug-induced lupus: an update

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) is a lupus-like illness that has been recognized as an entity under environmentally-induced lupus erythematosus, where other agents such as physical (ultra-violet irradiation), chemical (heavy metals, aromatic amines) and food products (alfalfa sprouts) have been implicated. DILE has been accepted as a side effect of therapy with over 80 drugs since its first description in association with sulfadiazine in 1945. The epidemiology and clinical course of SLE and DILE differ markedly and prognosis is generally favourable in the latter although occasional lifethreatening cases have been reported in the literature. Constant pharmacovigilance is crucial for prompt diagnosis and cessation of offending therapy offers the best outcome. This review discusses the clinical presentation, diagnosis of DILE as well as provides an update on postulated pathogenic mechanisms and an overview of implicated drugs.

Oral Terbinafine-Induced Bullous Pemphigoid

OBJECTIVE:

To report a case of drug-induced bullous pemphigoid (BP) in an otherwise healthy elderly patient after taking terbinafine for 20 days.

CASE SUMMARY:

A 78-year-old man presented with distal subungual onychomycosis of the toenails. Oral terbinafine 250 mg/d was started for treatment. Twenty days after the beginning of the treatment, the patient presented with widespread pruritic blistering eruption, more severe on the extremities. He had not received terbinafine before and was not receiving any other drug. The diagnosis of BP was confirmed with histopathologic examination. The patient was treated successfully with oral steroids.

DISCUSSION:

Drug-induced BP is a well-known complication of many drugs and represents a spectrum from an acute and self-limited condition to a chronic disease. Terbinafine is frequently used in the elderly. It is known to have less drug interactions and adverse effects compared with the other antifungal agents. Use of the Naranjo probability scale indicated a probable relationship between BP and terbinafine treatment in this patient.

CONCLUSIONS:

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report in the English-language literature of BP in a patient taking terbinafine. As with any other medication, oral terbinafine has the potential for severe adverse reactions. Healthcare professionals should be aware of this possibility.

Proton pump inhibitor-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Summary

Terbinafine-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus in two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus successfully treated with topical corticosteroids

So far in the literature there have been reported only 5 patients with a recognized and well-documented history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who developed SCLE after terbinafine introduction. Here we report two women suffering from SLE who developed SCLE after initiation of oral terbinafine for onychomycosis. Skin lesions in both of them were extensive, located on the trunk, and upper and lower extremities. No exacerbation of SLE symptoms was observed at that time. Despite severe skin lesions, patients revealed good response to topical corticosteroids within a few weeks. The systemic review of the literature and our experience on terbinafine-induced SCLE developing in patients with SLE allowed to create a description for this special subset: a) terbinafine-induced SCLE usually develop in 1–8 weeks after terbinafine introduction, b) skin lesions are usually severe, disseminated including lower extremities, c) patients present Ro/SS-A La/SS-B antibodies, but anti-histone antibodies are rarely observed, d) exacerbation of SLE symptoms is rather not observed, e) eruptions clear within 2–8 weeks, f) withdrawal of terbinafine and topical corticosteroids should be considered as a first-line therapy in these cases, g) terbinafine should be carefully used in patients suffering from SLE.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus induced and exacerbated by proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) can be induced by numerous drugs. We report 3 cases of SCLE induced by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

OBJECTIVE

To highlight a rare cutaneous side effect induced by a frequently prescribed drug such as a PPI.

CASE REPORTS

Case 1 was a 30-year-old man who developed multiple annular plaques over the trunk and lower limbs 1 month after the initiation of pantoprazole. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were positive with anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies, and histology confirmed the diagnosis. Clinical improvement was achieved 8 weeks after the discontinuation of pantoprazole and the introduction of a treatment combining topical steroids and hydroxychloroquine. Lesions relapsed when pantoprazole was accidentally rechallenged. The second case was a 31-year-old woman, 28 weeks pregnant, who presented erythematous annular plaques over the trunk 7 weeks after starting esomeprazole. ANA and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies were positive, and the histology was compatible with SCLE. Fetal ultrasound was normal. She was treated with topical and oral steroids and hydroxychloroquine. Clinical improvement was achieved 4 weeks after the discontinuation of esomeprazole. The third case was a 57-year-old woman with systemic erythematosus lupus presenting annular and psoriasiform lesions on the trunk for 15 months. She was treated successively with hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate with prednisone. A review of her drug history revealed the introduction of omeprazole a few weeks before the first appearance of skin lesions and omeprazole was contraindicated.

CONCLUSION

SCLE should systematically be suspected in case of eruption after the introduction of PPI. The risk of fetal cardiac complications is important in pregnant women.

Methimazole-induced bullous systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report

Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a kind of LE-non-specific bullous skin disease that is rarely induced by a medication. We describe the first case of bullous SLE to develop after administration of methimazole. A 31-yr-old woman presented with generalized erythematous patches, multiple bullae, arthralgia, fever, conjunctivitis, and hemolytic anemia. Biopsy of her bulla showed linear deposition of lgG, lgA, C3, fibrinogen, and C1q at dermo-epidermal junction. She was diagnosed as bullous SLE and treated with prednisolone, dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, and methotrexate. Our experience suggests that SLE should be considered as a differential diagnosis when bullous skin lesions develop in patients being treated for hyperthyroidism.

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus: incidence, management and prevention

The generation of autoantibodies and autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus has been associated with the use of certain drugs in humans. Early reports suggested that procainamide and hydralazine were associated with the highest risk of developing lupus, quinidine with a moderate risk and all other drugs were considered low or very low risk. More recently, drug-induced lupus has been associated with the use of the newer biological modulators such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors and interferons. The clinical features and laboratory findings of TNFα inhibitor-induced lupus are different from that of traditional drug-induced lupus or idiopathic lupus, and standardized criteria for the diagnosis of drug-induced lupus have not been established. The mechanism(s) responsible for the development of drug-induced lupus may vary depending on the drug or even on the patient. Besides lupus, other autoimmune diseases have been associated with drugs or toxins. Diagnosis of drug-induced lupus requires identification of a temporal relationship between drug administration and symptom development, and in traditional drug-induced lupus there must be no pre-existing lupus. Resolution of symptoms generally occurs after cessation of the drug. In this review, we will discuss those drugs that are more commonly associated with drug-induced lupus, with an emphasis on the new biologicals and the difficulty of making the diagnosis of drug-induced lupus against a backdrop of the autoimmune diseases that these drugs are used to treat. Stimulation of the immune system by these drugs to cause autoimmunity may in fact be associated with an increased effectiveness in treating the pathology for which they are prescribed, leading to the dilemma of deciding which is worse, the original disease or the adverse effect of the drug. Optimistically, one must hope that ongoing research in drug development and in pharmacogenetics will help to treat patients with the maximum effectiveness while minimizing side effects. Vigilance and early diagnosis are critical. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent developments in our understanding of the incidence, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced lupus.

A systematic review of drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus

The initial appearance of subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) skin lesions in conjunction with Ro/SS-A autoantibodies occurring as an adverse reaction to hydrochlorothiazide [i.e. drug-induced SCLE (DI-SCLE)] was first reported in 1985. Over the past decade an increasing number of drugs in different classes has been implicated as triggers for DI-SCLE. The management of DI-SCLE can be especially challenging in patients taking multiple medications capable of triggering DI-SCLE. Our objectives were to review the published English language literature on DI-SCLE and use the resulting summary data pool to address questions surrounding drug-induced SCLE and to develop guidelines that might be of value to clinicians in the diagnosis and management of DI-SCLE. A systematic review of the Medline/PubMed-cited literature on DI-SCLE up to August 2009 was performed. Our data collection and analysis strategies were prospectively designed to answer a series of questions related to the clinical, prognostic and pathogenetic significance of DI-SCLE. One hundred and seventeen cases of DI-SCLE were identified and reviewed. White women made up the large majority of cases, and the mean overall age was 58·0 years. Triggering drugs fell into a number of different classes, highlighted by antihypertensives and antifungals. Time intervals ('incubation period') between drug exposure and appearance of DI-SCLE varied greatly and were drug class dependent. Most cases of DI-SCLE spontaneously resolved within weeks of drug withdrawal. Ro/SS-A autoantibodies were present in 80% of the cases in which such data were reported and most remained positive after resolution of SCLE skin disease activity. No significant differences in the clinical, histopathological or immunopathological features between DI-SCLE and idiopathic SCLE were detected. There is now adequate published experience to suggest that DI-SCLE does not differ clinically, histopathologically or immunologically from idiopathic SCLE. It should be recognized as a distinct clinical constellation differing clinically and immunologically from the classical form of drug-induced systemic lupus erythematosus.

Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) is a subset of cutaneous lupus erythematosus with unique immunologic and clinical features. The first description dates back to 1985 when a series of five patients were found to have hydrochlorothiazide-induced SCLE. Since that time, at least 40 other drugs have been implicated in the induction of SCLE.

The impact of the EUSCLE core set questionnaire for the assessment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Epidemiological data and standard European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) are lacking in the current literature. In order to provide a standardized tool for an extensive consistent data collection, a study group of the European Society of Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus (EUSCLE) recently developed a Core Set Questionnaire for the assessment of patients with different subtypes of CLE. The EUSCLE Core Set Questionnaire includes six sections on patient data, diagnosis, skin involvement, activity and damage of disease, laboratory analysis, and treatment. An instrument like the EUSCLE Core Set Questionnaire is essential to gain a broad and comparable data collection of patients with CLE from different European centres and to achieve consensus concerning clinical standards for the disease. The data will also be important for further characterization of the different CLE subtypes and the evaluation of therapeutic strategies; moreover, the EUSCLE Core Set Questionnaire might also be useful for the comparison of data in clinical trials. In this review, the impact of the EUSCLE Core Set Questionnaire is discussed in detail with regard to clinical and serological features as well as therapeutic modalities in CLE. Lupus (2010) 19, 1144—1152.

Drug-induced lupus: an update on its dermatologic aspects

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) is defined as an entity characterized by clinical manifestations and immunopathological serum findings similar to those of idiopathic lupus but which is temporally related to continuous drug exposure and resolves after discontinuation of the offending drug. Similar to idiopathic lupus, DILE can be divided into systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). Based on the literature review and retrospective analysis of our case series, we focused on the dermatological aspects of DILE. The cutaneous features of drug-induced SLE are protean, including particularly purpura, erythema nodosum and photosensitivity as well as the skin lesions characterizing both urticarial and necrotizing vasculitis. The typical laboratory profile of systemic DILE consists of positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antihistone antibodies, the latter being regarded as the serum marker of this subset. The drugs most frequently implicated in the development of systemic DILE are hydralazine, procainamide, isoniazid and minocycline. Drug-induced SCLE usually presents with annular polycyclic or papulosquamous cutaneous manifestations as in the idiopathic form, but blisters or targetoid lesions mimicking erythema multiforme cannot rarely be associated. The clinical presentation is often generalized, with involvement of the lower legs that are usually spared in idiopathic SCLE. ANA and anti-Ro/SSA antibodies are usually present, whereas antihistone antibodies are uncommonly found. Drugs associated with SCLE include particularly calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, thiazide diuretics, terbinafine and the recently reported tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists. Drug-induced CCLE is very rarely described in the literature and usually refers to fluorouracile agents or TNF-α antagonists. The picture is characterized by the occurrence of classic discoid lesions, but aspects of lupus tumidus can occasionally develop. ANA are demonstrated in around two-thirds of the cases. Management of DILE is based on the withdrawal of the offending drug. Topical and/or systemic corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents should be reserved for resistant cases.

RETRACTED: Drug-induced lupus erythematosus

Drug-induced lupus is a syndrome which share symptoms and laboratory characteristics with idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The terms drug-induced lupus (DIL) and drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) are preferred, but other ones are also used-drug-related lupus, lupus-like syndrome and lupus erythematosus medicamentosus. The first case of DILE was reported in 1945 and associated with sulfadiazine. In 1953, it was reported that DILE was related to the use of hydralazine. More than 80 drugs have been associated with DILE. The average age of patients with DILE is nearly twice that of patients with idiopathic SLE. Approximately half the patients with drug-induced SLE are women, compared with 90% of patients with idiopathic SLE. Similarly to idiopathic lupus, DILE can be divided into systemic, sub-acute cutaneous and chronic cutaneous lupus. The syndrome is characterised by arthralgia, myalgia, pleurisy, rash and fever in association with antinuclear antibodies in the serum. The clinical and laboratory manifestations of drug-induced SLE are similar to those of idiopathic SLE, but central nervous system and renal involvement are rare in DILE. Recognition of DILE is important because it usually reverts within a few weeks after stopping the drug. This review discusses the general issues in DILE, such as pathogenic mechanisms, clinical forms and diagnostic criteria, and provides more detailed information for some of the most recent implicated drugs: minocycline, statins, anti-TNF-alpha agents.

Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus induced by terbinafine: case report and review of literature

SUMMARY

Systemic lupus erythematosus and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE) occasionally evolve as adverse reactions to a large variety of chemically different drugs. We here report on a 76-year-old woman who developed SCLE within 10 days after initiation of oral terbinafine. Analysis of the 27 cases of terbinafine-induced SCLE in the literature revealed that this disorder has been reported 6 times more often in females than in males. Skin lesions evolved on average around 7 weeks after starting the drug. In 79% of the cases ANA could be detected while antibodies against Ro/SS-A and La/SS-B were found in 86% and 39%, respectively. Remarkably, anti-histone antibodies were present in only 29%. In all cases terbinafine-induced SCLE resolved after discontinuation of the triggering agent. Systemic treatment with anti-malarials and/or corticosteroids does not appear to be mandatory.

Terbinafine-induced dermatomyositis: a case report and literature review of drug-induced dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis, a connective tissue disease syndrome where antibodies to the endothelium of the microvasculature of the skin, muscle and lung are implicated in lesional propagation, is characterized by photodistributed erythema, heliotrope rash, Gottron's papules, muscle weakness and interstitial pulmonary fibrosis. Endotheliotropic viruses and underlying neoplasia are among the inciting triggers. Uncommon drugs, namely the lipid-lowering agents, have been implicated in dermatomyositis. The patient, a 57-year-old man, developed a photodistributed rash and muscle weakness following treatment with the antifungal medication, terbinafine. A skin biopsy was performed, showing an atrophying interface dermatitis with pandermal mucinosis and striking vasculopathic changes including endothelial cell necrosis with denudement and basement membrane zone reduplication. Ultrastructural studies confirmed the presence of endothelial cell injury. Direct immunofluorescent testing showed prominent staining of C5b-9 along the dermal-epidermal junction and within the vasculature. Western blot studies showed strong seroreactivity of his serum to an endothelial-based protein weighing 45,000, a common target described in other microvascular injury-based syndromes. We have shown a temporal association between use of terbinafine and the development of dermatomyositis. The exact basis remains speculative. One potential hypothesis is based on the fact that terbinafine, the active agent in terbinafine, triggers apoptosis of human endothelial cells in culture. Enhanced endothelial cell apoptosis results in the displacement of various cellular antigens creating a state of neoantigenicity; its attendant sequelae is held to be one of anti-endothelial cell antibody formation, a defining pathogenetic event in the evolution of dermatomyositis. The second may be because of the effects of the drug on the promotion of an interferon-rich T-helper-1-dominant cytokine milieu.

Drug-induced lupus

Drug-induced lupus (DIL) is a rare adverse reaction to a large variety of drugs with features resembling those of idiopathic systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It usually develops only after months and, quite commonly, years of treatment with the offending agent, although latencies of days or weeks have been described in some instances. There are some indications that the risk of DIL can increase with higher daily and cumulative doses and with longer duration of therapy. There are no definitive and commonly accepted diagnostic criteria for DIL, but the following guidelines have been proposed: (a) sufficient and continuing exposure to a specific drug, (b) at least one symptom compatible with SLE, (c) no history suggestive of SLE before starting the drug, and (d) resolution of symptoms within weeks (sometimes months) after discontinuation of the putative offending agent. In addition, it is frequently suggested that the presence of ANA is required for the diagnosis of DIL. However, negative ANA test results should not automatically preclude such a diagnosis, particularly if a patient has other autoantibodies associated with SLE/DIL.

Paclitaxel-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus in patients with serum anti-SSA/Ro antibody

Two women (aged 46 and 56 years) developed annular erythema on their sun-exposed skin, including their forearms and faces, after biweekly i.v. administration of paclitaxel for 3-4 months to treat breast cancer. Both cases showed interface changes of basal keratinocytes and high titers of serum anti-SSA/Ro antibody. The diagnoses of paclitaxel-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE) were made because the skin eruptions cleared rapidly within 3 weeks after the paclitaxel treatment was discontinued. Paclitaxel is proposed to be a causative agent that can provoke cutaneous LE.

Anti-SSA/Ro Antibody as a Risk Factor for Fluorouracil-Induced Drug Eruptions Showing Acral Erythema and Discoid-Lupus-Erythematosus-Like Lesions

BACKGROUND

It is well known that fluorouracil (FU) agents frequently induce discoid-lupus-erythematosus (DLE)-like eruptions and acral erythema in Japan. However, the etiology of these drug eruptions caused by FU agents has not been clarified yet.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the existence of anti-SSA/Ro antibody may be a risk factor for FU-agent-induced DLE-like eruptions and acral erythema.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Six patients with FU-agent-induced drug eruptions showing DLE-like lesions and acral erythema were enrolled in this study. The titers of anti-SSA/Ro antibody in the sera and the histopathology of the skin lesions were examined.

RESULTS

Biopsy specimens from DLE-like eruptions and all 5 examined acral erythema cases showed lichenoid change of the basal keratinocytes. Direct immunofluorescence studies revealed deposition of immunoglobulins along the basement membrane zone in the lesions of both DLE-like eruptions and acral erythema. Further, all 6 cases had high titers of serum anti-SSA/Ro antibody, which did not decline within 6 months after cessation of the causative drug.

CONCLUSION

We propose that anti-SSA/Ro antibody may be a risk factor for FU-agent-induced drug eruptions showing acral erythema and DLE-like eruptions.

Syndrome de Stevens-Johnson et aggravation d’un lupus systémique induits par la terbinafine

BACKGROUND

There have been published reports of induction and aggravation of subacute systemic lupus erythematosus of lupus by terbinafine. We report the case of female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus who, after treatment with terbinafine, presented a Stevens Johnson syndrome eruption, together with renal exacerbation of her connective tissue disease.

OBSERVATION

A 25 - year-old woman was followed for 4 years for systemic lupus erythematosus was no renal involvement. The patient was stable under corticosteroids (20 mg/d) and chloroquine (200 mg/d). She was treated with terbinafine onychomycosis caused by Trichophyton rubrum. Seven days after trunk and limbs, with cheilitis affecting the mucous membrane and bilateral conjunctivitis. This rash was followed by epidermolysis involving 10% of the cutaneous area. Stevens-Johnson syndrome was diagnosed. Laboratory tests indicated massive hematuria and proteinuria, and the renal needle biopsy sample showed signs of class III lupus glomerulonephritis. The anti-histone antibodies were highly positive. The patient was treated with systemic corticosteroids (1 mg/kg/d), chloroquine was recommenced and cyclophosphamides were given in a bolus. The outcome of the patient's eruption and lupus was favorable.

DISCUSSION

Although induction and worsening of lupus by terbinafine have already been reported, the present case differs through the concomitant occurrence of eruption on treatment with terbinafine and severe relapse of lupus, thus suggesting the involvement of a shared immunological mechanism.

Kutaner Lupus erythematodes

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a heterogenous disorder with a wide range of skin manifestations. Therefore, it has been difficult to develop a unifying concept for classifying CLE from the dermatologic perspective in the past. In 2004, the classification system was updated and includes now acute CLE (ACLE), subacute CLE (SCLE), chronic CLE (CCLE), and intermittent CLE (ICLE). Additional rarely described variants are not listed as separate entities but are included in the classical forms. Diagnosis of the different subtypes of CLE is made by considering genetic, clinical, histopathologic, and immunoserologic findings, with a systematic analysis of individual criteria. In the past years, the etiology and pathogenesis of CLE has been subject of intensive research and it has been shown by several groups that exogenous factors, such as ultraviolet light and drugs, can induce CLE. The first part of this review will enable the reader to identify the various clinical manifestations of CLE and to employ characteristic criteria to assess differential diagnostic considerations.

Coexisting subacute and systemic lupus erythematosus after terbinafine administration: successful treatment with mycophenolate mofetil

A 39-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus was treated with terbinafine for onychomycosis. After only 7 days of treatment with 250 mg terbinafine, a widespread severe erythematous eruption developed. The results of clinical, histological and immunofluorescent examinations confirmed the diagnosis of coexisting subacute and systemic lupus erythematosus. The patient was treated with drug withdrawal and administration of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. One year later, mycophenolate mofetil was successfully used. Exacerbation or induction of lupus erythematosus is an extremely rare cutaneous side-effect of terbinafine. Patients with lupus erythematosus should be advised about the risk of some drugs that might exacerbate their disease.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A personal approach to management

SUMMARY Skin disease in patients with lupus erythematosus may be subdivided into two broad categories - those lesions that when biopsied demonstrate interface dermatitis and those that do not demonstrate interface dermatitis. The skin lesions that are represented by the interface dermatitis include discoid lupus erythematosus, subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Patients with these 'specific' manifestations have varying degrees of systemic involvement from rare systemic disease in patients with localized discoid lupus erythematosus to common and often severe involvement in patients with acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Patients who do not demonstrate interface dermatitis also may have systemic disease and in some instances the skin manifestations are linked to some of the more severe systemic manifestations. Many patients with cutaneous lesions characterized by the interface dermatitis can be controlled with 'standard' therapies including sunscreens, protective clothing and behavioural alteration, and topical corticosteroids with or without an oral antimalarial agent. This review presents a brief summary of each common cutaneous manifestation of lupus erythematosus, its relationship to systemic involvement and treatment issues to effectively deal with the lupus erythematosus patient who has skin disease.

Terbinafine-Induced Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Nearly 10% of lupus erythematosus (LE) are drug induced. More than 60 different drugs are involved in iatrogenic LE. We report herein 3 cases of terbinafine-induced LE.

OBSERVATIONS

Three patients receiving terbinafine for a suspected dermatophytic infection developed a subacute cutaneous LE, within 7 weeks following terbinafine introduction. The patients' medical history included sicca syndrome, lung carcinoma and Kikuchi disease, respectively. Clinical remission occurred within 15 weeks following terbinafine withdrawal.

DISCUSSION

Sixteen cases of terbinafine-induced LE have been previously reported, including 13 women. The median age was 54 years. Prior autoimmunity was reported in 10 cases, including 5 pre-existing LE. The median delay between terbinafine introduction and LE onset was 5 weeks. The median time until clinical recovery following terbinafine withdrawal was 8 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Terbinafine should be prescribed only in patients with proven dermatophytosis. We recommend cautious monitoring in patients with pre-existing autoimmunity. The diagnosis of terbinafine-induced LE should lead to the immediate and definitive withdrawal of the drug.

Pigmentierung des Gesichtes unter Therapie mit Terbinafin

A 65-year-old patient presented with grey-brownish maculae localized on the face. He had been treated with oral terbinafine due to onychomycosis, and the first spots manifested after 4 weeks of therapy. Other drugs were not taken by the patient, who was otherwise in a healthy condition. Histology showed melanin localized within macrophages in the upper and lower dermis. Cutaneous side effects are well described in patients treated with terbinafine and usually present as urticaria or eczema. Severe reactions may occur in rare cases. Hyperpigmentation has not yet been described as a consequence of oral terbinafine. Grey hyperpigmentation as it occurred in our patient has been described as a side effect of therapy with minocycline, amiodarone, tricyclic antidepressants, or heavy metals. This case report shows that drug-induced hyperpigmentation should also be considered if the patient takes drugs not known for this kind of side effect.

Acebutolol-Induced Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Beta-blocking medications are rarely associated with drug-induced lupus erythematosus syndrome and have never been incriminated as a cause of subacute lupus erythematosus (SCLE). We present herein the first case of SCLE induced by acebutolol. A 57-year-old woman presented with a 1-month history of a cutaneous eruption of the photo-exposed areas. One month ago, the patient had started a treatment with oral acebutolol to cure a hypertension of 1-year evolution. Physical examination revealed erythematous scaly annular plaques, involving the face, arms and trunk. Immunologic serology findings revealed a positive titer of antinuclear antibodies up to 1/1,280 with positivity of antihistone and Ro/SSA antibodies. Acebutolol was stopped, and the lesions cleared completely 4 months later. Literature data, along with our case, suggest a link between acebutolol therapy and the onset of a lupus syndrome. Although this is the first report of acebutolol-induced SCLE, we should be aware of this occurrence, and avoidance of acebutolol is recommended in patients with stigmata of lupus erythematosus.

Lúpus eritematoso cutâneo: aspectos clínicos e laboratoriais

O lúpus eritematoso é doença auto-imune do tecido conjuntivo que reúne manifestações exclusivamente cutâneas ou multissistêmicas, podendo apresentar exuberância de auto-anticorpos. As lesões cutâneas do lúpus eritematoso são polimorfas e podem ser específicas ou inespecíficas. A diversidade de manifestações clínicas da doença reflete-se no amplo espectro de achados laboratoriais. Este artigo descreve as variadas formas clínicas do lúpus eritematoso cutâneo correlacionando-os com achados histopatológicos, de imunofluorescência direta e sorológicos.

Severe sialadenitis: A new complication of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms

BACKGROUND

Drug cutaneous reaction and isolated cases of parotitis induced by terbinafine have been reported.

OBSERVATION

We report a case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms induced by terbinafine associated with a severe sialadenitis and a complete sicca syndrome. Evolution was protracted with a slow recovery of the rash but sicca syndrome persisted with only a very mild improvement at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Liver, kidneys, lungs, and heart are the organs the most frequently involved in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Salivary and lacrimal glands can also be severely involved in the course of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.

Update on the management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

This paper reviews the latest treatments for cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It focuses on evidence-based guidance for the management of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, with identification of the strength of evidence available at this time. In addition, I have briefly reviewed the epidemiological aspects, diagnosis and evaluation of patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus. This review reflects data available from the Cochrane Library, Medline, literature searches, and the experience of the author managing patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus for over 25 years.

Drug-induced lupus erythematosus

Among the numerous idiopathic immune-mediated diseases that can be drug-induced, such as pemphigus, psoriasis, lichen, etc, drug-induced lupus is the most widely commented upon and investigated. The terms drug-induced lupus (DIL) and drug-induced lupus erythematosus (DILE) are preferred, but other ones are also used--drug-related lupus, lupus-like syndrome, and lupus erythematosus medicamentosus. This review discusses the general issues in DILE, such as pathogenic mechanisms, clinical forms, and diagnostic criteria, and provides more detailed information for some of the implicated drugs: minocycline, statins, terbinafine, etc.