Experiments on the afterimages of stimulus change (Dvorák 1870): a translation with commentary

Sigmund Exner's (1887) Einige Beobachtungen über Bewegungsnachbilder (Some Observations on Movement Aftereffects): An Illustrated Translation With Commentary

In his original contribution, Exner's principal concern was a comparison between the properties of different aftereffects, and particularly to determine whether aftereffects of motion were similar to those of color and whether they could be encompassed within a unified physiological framework. Despite the fact that he was unable to answer his main question, there are some excellent-so far unknown-contributions in Exner's paper. For example, he describes observations that can be related to binocular interaction, not only in motion aftereffects but also in rivalry. To the best of our knowledge, Exner provides the first description of binocular rivalry induced by differently moving patterns in each eye, for motion as well as for their aftereffects. Moreover, apart from several known, but beautifully addressed, phenomena he makes a clear distinction between motion in depth based on stimulus properties and motion in depth based on the interpretation of motion. That is, the experience of movement, as distinct from the perception of movement. The experience, unlike the perception, did not result in a motion aftereffect in depth.

Increasing-loudness aftereffect following decreasing-intensity adaptation: spectral dependence in interotic and monotic testing

Listening to decreasing intensity leads to illusory increasing loudness afterwards. Evidence suggests that this increasing-loudness aftereffect may have a sensory component concerned with dynamic localisation. This was tested by comparing the spectral dependence of monotic aftereffect (adapting and testing one ear) with the spectral dependence of interotic aftereffect (adapting one ear and testing the other ear). Existence of the proposed component implies that monotic aftereffect should be more spectrally dependent than interotic aftereffect. Three listeners were exposed to a 1 kHz adapting stimulus. From responses of "growing softer" or "growing louder" to test stimuli changing in intensity, nulls were calculated; test carrier frequencies ranged from 0.5 kHz to 2 kHz. Confirming the hypothesis, monotic aftereffect was about three times as strong as interotic aftereffect for the 1 kHz test carrier frequency, while monotic and interotic aftereffects were comparable in magnitude for test carrier frequencies below about 0.8 kHz and above about 1.2 kHz. The latter residual aftereffects are attributed to cognitive processing, perhaps concerning response bias. Sensitivity did not vary systematically across conditions; this is consistent with evidence that changing intensity entails mainly direct processing. The results cannot be attributed to the loudness adaptation elicited by steady stimuli.

Changing-loudness aftereffects: slope of response functions and spectral dependence

Aftereffects of azimuthal auditory motion may have two components. A sensory component is inferred from strong aftereffects, because they are spectrally dependent and have shallower response functions than those for non-adaptation. Neither property applies to weak aftereffects, suggesting a cognitive component. Two experiments determined whether changing-loudness aftereffects (CLA) might be understood similarly. In a single-interval forced-choice procedure, listeners responded "growing softer" or "growing louder" to test stimuli changing in intensity. In Exp. 1, adapting and test stimuli were diotic and had the same 1-kHz sinusoidal carrier. Although response functions following adaptation were displaced from response functions for non-adaptation-indicating CLA-their slopes were broadly similar. In Exp. 2, stimuli were monotic; adapting frequency was 1 kHz and test frequencies were between 0.5 and 2.0 kHz. CLA was present in most adaptation conditions, but was strongest when the test frequency was 1.0 kHz; functions' slopes again evinced no systematic variation. The two-component hypothesis for CLA is supported by spectral dependence alone. It is argued that the slope of response functions is due to the nulling procedures for measuring auditory aftereffects. The slope depends on whether the adapted property is processed by "direct" and "indirect" mechanisms; aftereffects tap "direct" mechanisms alone, which may affect sensitivity during measurement.

Auditory aftereffects following simulated motion produced by varying interaural intensity or time

Simulated auditory motion, ie step-ramp modulated interaural intensity (delta I) or time (delta t) was presented via headphones as an adapting stimulus (narrow-band signal of 1 kHz mean frequency). After adaptation, settings of a stationary test stimulus were systematically shifted in the opposite direction when the experimental parameter was delta I, but not when it was delta t. Further studies with delta t motion with the use of mean frequencies of 100 Hz or 6 kHz showed an aftereffect only at 6 kHz. Unlike visual motion aftereffects, no counter-motion was observed; rather the test stimulus appeared stationary, but settings of its interaural midline were displaced in a direction opposite to the direction of adaptation (on average by 1.2 dB or 30 microseconds for delta I-stimulated and delta t-stimulated motion, respectively). This displacement effect decayed with time after adaptation. The frequency dependence found for delta t motion suggests that the low-frequency mechanism of directional hearing that uses interaural ongoing-time (phase) differences is not able to adapt. The observed auditory aftereffects may be analogous to visual motion aftereffects since they are direction specific; however, because they lack apparent motion they also resemble disparity-specific stereoscopic aftereffects.