Porcine m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor-effector coupling in Chinese hamster ovary cells

Molecular mechanisms of inverse agonism via κ-opioid receptor-G protein complexes

Opioid receptors, a subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are key therapeutic targets. In the canonical GPCR activation model, agonist binding is required for receptor-G protein complex formation, while antagonists prevent G protein coupling. However, many GPCRs exhibit basal activity, allowing G protein association without an agonist. The pharmacological impact of agonist-free receptor-G protein complexes is poorly understood. Here we present biochemical evidence that certain κ-opioid receptor (KOR) inverse agonists can act via KOR-Gi protein complexes. To investigate this phenomenon, we determined cryo-EM structures of KOR-Gi protein complexes with three inverse agonists: JDTic, norBNI and GB18, corresponding to structures of inverse agonist-bound GPCR-G protein complexes. Remarkably, the orthosteric binding pocket resembles the G protein-free 'inactive' receptor conformation, while the receptor remains coupled to the G protein. In summary, our work challenges the canonical model of receptor antagonism and offers crucial insights into GPCR pharmacology.

Beauty of the beast: anticholinergic tropane alkaloids in therapeutics

Tropane alkaloids (TAs) are among the most valued chemical compounds known since pre-historic times. Poisonous plants from Solanaceae family (Hyoscyamus niger, Datura, Atropa belladonna, Scopolia lurida, Mandragora officinarum, Duboisia) and Erythroxylaceae (Erythroxylum coca) are rich sources of tropane alkaloids. These compounds possess the anticholinergic properties as they could block the neurotransmitter acetylcholine action in the central and peripheral nervous system by binding at either muscarinic and/or nicotinic receptors. Hence, they are of great clinical importance and are used as antiemetics, anesthetics, antispasmodics, bronchodilator and mydriatics. They also serve as the lead compounds to generate more effective drugs. Due to the important pharmacological action they are listed in the WHO list of essential medicines and are available in market with FDA approval. However, being anticholinergic in action, TA medication are under the suspicion of causing dementia and cognitive decline like other medications with anticholinergic action, interestingly which is incorrect. There are published reviews on chemistry, biosynthesis, pharmacology, safety concerns, biotechnological aspects of TAs but the detailed information on anticholinergic mechanism of action, clinical pharmacology, FDA approval and anticholinergic burden is lacking. Hence the present review tries to fill this lacuna by critically summarizing and discussing the above mentioned aspects.

Variable Dependence of Signaling Output on Agonist Occupancy of Ste2p, a G Protein-coupled Receptor in Yeast

We report here on the relationship between ligand binding and signaling responses in the yeast pheromone response pathway, a well characterized G protein-coupled receptor system. Responses to agonist (α-factor) by cells expressing widely varying numbers of receptors depend primarily on fractional occupancy, not the absolute number of agonist-bound receptors. Furthermore, the concentration of competitive antagonist required to inhibit α-factor-dependent signaling is more than 10-fold higher than predicted based on the known ligand affinities. Thus, responses to a particular number of agonist-bound receptors can vary greatly, depending on whether there are unoccupied or antagonist-bound receptors present on the same cell surface. This behavior does not appear to be due to pre-coupling of receptors to G protein or to the Sst2p regulator of G protein signaling. The results are consistent with a signaling response that is determined by the integration of positive signals from agonist-occupied receptors and inhibitory signals from unoccupied receptors, where the inhibitory signals can be diminished by antagonist binding.

Use of radiolabeled antagonist assays for assessing agonism at D2 and D3 dopamine receptors: comparison with functional GTPγS assays

BACKGROUND

Cell-based drug screening assays are essential tools for drug discovery and development targeting G protein-coupled receptors, which include dopamine D3 receptors. D3 is notorious for its poor coupling to G protein in most heterologous cell lines, and therefore D3 agonist-stimulated binding of [(35)S]GTPγS to G protein cannot be observed in many "non-functional" D3 expressing cell lines.

NEW METHOD

The present work explores the use of an alternate method for assessing agonist activity, consisting of measuring the difference in agonist competition between [(3)H]spiperone bound to low-affinity states of the receptor and that with radioligand bound to high-affinity states (GTP shift assay).

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD

The current study describes the determination of GTP shifts in [(3)H]spiperone binding assays for the assessment of agonists' potencies (at D2 and D3) and efficacies (at D3). Compared with GTPγ(35)S binding assays, the new method removes the cumbersome need of functional D3 cell lines and limited project duration due to short half-life of isotope (35)S.

CONCLUSION

The new method allows the estimation of potency (D2 and D3) and efficacy (D3) at the level of receptor and G protein activation in a simple fashion from shifts in monophasic-inhibition curves. Moreover, it does not require [(35)S]GTPγS binding assays with functional D3 cells. This method will have wide applicability for D3-selective agonist screening. It may also be useful for other GPCRs circumventing the need for functional assays and offering the ability to detect agonist activity regardless of the particular signaling pathway.

Constitutive activities and inverse agonism in dopamine receptors

The concept of activation in the absence of agonists has been demonstrated for many GPCRs and is now solidified as one of the principal aspects of GPCR signaling. In this chapter, we review how dopamine receptors demonstrate this ability. Although difficult to prove in vivo due to the presence of endogenous dopamine and lack of subtype-selective inverse agonists and "pure" antagonists (neutral ligands), in vitro assays such as measuring intracellular cAMP, [(35)S]GTPγS binding, and [(3)H]thymidine incorporation have uncovered the constitutive activation of D1- and D2-class receptors. Nevertheless, because of limited and inconsistent findings, the existence of constitutive activity for D2-class receptors is currently not well established. Mutagenesis studies have shown that basal signaling, notably by D1-class receptors, is governed by the collective contributions of transmembrane domains and extracellular/intracellular loops, such as the third extracellular loop, the third intracellular loop, and C-terminal tail. Furthermore, constitutive activities of D1-class receptors are subjected to regulation by kinases. Among the dopamine receptor family, the D5 receptor subtype exhibits a higher basal signaling and bears resemblance to constitutively active mutant forms of GPCRs. The presence of its constitutive activity in vivo and its pathophysiological relevance, with a brief mention of other subtypes, are also discussed.

Pharmacology and selectivity of various natural and synthetic bombesin related peptide agonists for human and rat bombesin receptors differs

The mammalian bombesin (Bn)-receptor family [gastrin-releasing peptide-receptor (GRPR-receptor), neuromedin B-receptor (NMB receptor)], their natural ligands, GRP/NMB, as well as the related orphan receptor, BRS-3, are widely distributed, and frequently overexpressed by tumors. There is increased interest in agonists for this receptor family to explore their roles in physiological/pathophysiological processes, and for receptor-imaging/cytotoxicity in tumors. However, there is minimal data on human pharmacology of Bn receptor agonists and most results are based on nonhuman receptor studies, particular rodent-receptors, which with other receptors frequently differ from human-receptors. To address this issue we compared hNMB-/GRP-receptor affinities and potencies/efficacies of cell activation (assessing phospholipase C activity) for 24 putative Bn-agonists (12 natural, 12 synthetic) in four different cells with these receptors, containing native receptors or receptors expressed at physiological densities, and compared the results to native rat GRP-receptor containing cells (AR42J-cells) or rat NMB receptor cells (C6-glioblastoma cells). There were close correlations (r=0.92-99, p<0.0001) between their affinities/potencies for the two hGRP- or hNMB-receptor cells. Twelve analogs had high affinities (≤ 1 nM) for hGRP receptor with 15 selective for it (greatest=GRP, NMC), eight had high affinity/potencies for hNMB receptors and four were selective for it. Only synthetic Bn analogs containing β-alanine(11) had high affinity for hBRS-3, but also had high affinities/potencies for all GRP-/hNMB-receptor cells. There was no correlation between affinities for human GRP receptors and rat GRP receptors (r=0.131, p=0.54), but hNMB receptor results correlated with rat NMB receptor (r=0.71, p<0.0001). These results elucidate the human and rat GRP-receptor pharmacophore for agonists differs markedly, whereas they do not for NMB receptors, therefore potential GRP-receptor agonists for human studies (such as Bn receptor-imaging/cytotoxicity) must be assessed on human Bn receptors. The current study provides affinities/potencies on a large number of potential agonists that might be useful for human studies.

Membrane cholesterol content influences binding properties of muscarinic M2 receptors and differentially impacts activation of second messenger pathways

We investigated the influence of membrane cholesterol content on preferential and non-preferential signaling through the M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor expressed in CHO cells. Cholesterol depletion by 39% significantly decreased the affinity of M(2) receptors for [(3)H]-N-methylscopolamine ([(3)H]-NMS) binding and increased B(max) in intact cells and membranes. Membranes displayed two-affinity agonist binding sites for carbachol and cholesterol depletion doubled the fraction of high-affinity binding sites. In intact cells it also reduced the rate of agonist-induced receptor internalization and changed the profile of agonist binding from a single site to two affinity states. Cholesterol enrichment by 137% had no effects on carbachol E(max) of cAMP synthesis inhibition and on cAMP synthesis stimulation and inositolphosphates (IP) accumulation at higher agonist concentrations (non-preferred pathways). On the other hand, cholesterol depletion significantly increased E(max) of cAMP synthesis inhibition or stimulation without change in potency, and decreased E(max) of IP accumulation. Noteworthy, modifications of membrane cholesterol had no effect on membrane permeability, oxidative activity, protein content, or relative expression of G(s), G(i/o), and G(q/11) alpha subunits. These results demonstrate distinct changes of M(2) receptor signaling through both preferential and non-preferential G-proteins consequent to membrane cholesterol depletion that occur at the level of receptor/G-protein/effector protein interactions in the cell membrane. The significant decrease of IP accumulation by cholesterol depletion was also observed in cells expressing M(3) receptors and by both cholesterol depletion and enrichment in cells expressing M(1) receptors indicating relevance of reduced G(q/11) signaling for the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease.

On the analysis of ligand-directed signaling at G protein-coupled receptors

The phenomenon of "ligand-directed signaling" is often considered to be inconsistent with the traditional receptor theory. In this review, I show how the mathematics of the receptor theory can be used to measure the observed affinity and relative efficacy of protean ligands at G protein-coupled receptors. The basis of this analysis rests on the assumption that the fraction of agonist bound in the form of the active receptor-G protein-guanine nucleotide complex is the biochemical equivalent of the pharmacological stimulus. Consequently, this stimulus function is analogous to the current response of a ligand-gated ion channel. Because guanosine triphosphate (GTP) greatly inhibits the formation of the active quaternary complex, even the most efficacious agonists probably only elicit partial receptor activation, and it seems likely that the ceiling of 100% receptor activation is not reached in the intact cell with high intracellular concentrations of GTP. Under these conditions, the maximum of the stimulus function is proportional to the ratio of microscopic affinity constants of the agonist for ground and active states. Ligand-directed signaling depends on the existence of different active states of the receptor with different selectivities for different G proteins or other effectors. This phenomenon can be characterized using classic pharmacological methods. Although not widely appreciated, it is possible to estimate the product of observed affinity and intrinsic efficacy expressed relative to that of another agonist (intrinsic relative activity) through the analysis of the concentration-response curves. No other information is required. This approach should be useful in quantifying agonist activity and in converting the two disparate parameters of potency and maximal response into a single parameter dependent only on the agonist-receptor-effector complex.

Activity and post antifungal effect of chlorpromazine and trifluopherazine against Aspergillus, Scedosporium and zygomycetes

The phenothiazine compounds chlorpromazine and trifluopherazine are antipsychotic agents that exhibit antimicrobial activity against bacteria, some protozoa and yeasts. Data of activity against filamentous fungi are lacking. The in vitro activity and postantifungal effect (PAFE) of chlorpromazine and trifluopherazine was determined against Aspergillus species, zygomycetes and Scedosporium species. In vitro susceptibility testing was performed with CLSI M38A and the PAFE was determined with previously established methods. Both drugs inhibited the growth of all fungi tested at concentrations of 16 to 64 microg ml(-1). For Aspergillus species the mean PAFE was 3.7 and 4.7 h; for zygomycetes, 3.1 and 3.4 h; for Scedosporium, 4.3 and 5.3 h for chlorpromazine and trifluoroperazine respectively. These are the first drugs shown to induce PAFE against Scedosporium. We show that phenothiazine compounds have in vitro antifungal activity and exhibit PAFE against a broad range of filamentous fungal pathogens. Although the exact mechanism of action is unknown, further studies are needed to explore the clinical usefulness of phenothiazine compounds.

Muscarinic M2 receptors directly activate Gq/11 and Gs G-proteins

Muscarinic M(2) receptors preferentially couple with the G(i/o) class of G-proteins to inhibit cAMP synthesis. However, they can also stimulate net synthesis of cAMP and inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation. We investigated in intact Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing human M(2) receptors (CHO-M(2) cells) whether direct interaction of M(2) receptors with G(s) and G(q/11) G-proteins is responsible for the latter effects. Suppression of the G(s)alpha subunit using RNA interference abolished stimulation of cAMP synthesis induced by 1 mM carbachol in both control and pertussis toxin-treated CHO-M(2) cells but had no effect on the inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP synthesis. Carbachol stimulated accumulation of IP with an EC(50) of 79 microM. Removal of the G(q),G(11), or both alpha subunits reduced this response by 78, 54, and 92%, respectively, whereas suppression of the G(s)alpha subunit had no effect. Similar results obtained in CHO cells expressing M(1) receptors that preferentially couple with G(s) and G(q/11) G-proteins confirmed the efficiency of siRNA treatments. Stimulation of M(2) receptors in control and pertussis toxin-treated cells by a series of full agonists with respect to inhibition of adenylyl cyclase displayed different efficacies in stimulating IP accumulation. Carbachol, acetylcholine, and oxotremorine-M [N,N,N-trimethyl-4-(2-oxo-1-pyrolidinyl)-2-butyn-1-ammonium] behaved as full agonists, furmethide (N,N,N-trimethyl-2-furanmethammonium) and methylfurmethide [(5-methyl-2-furyl)methyltrimethylammonium] were partial agonists, and oxotremorine (1-[4-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-2-butynyl]-2-pyrrolidinone) had no effect. Our results provide direct evidence of M(2) receptor coupling with the alpha subunits of G(s) and G(q/11) G-proteins and demonstrate induction of multiple receptor conformational states dependent on both the concentration and the nature of the agonist used.

Constitutive activity of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

We review the literature describing constitutive activity of the five muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in native and recombinant systems and discuss the effect of constitutive activity on muscarinic pharmacology in the context of modern models of receptor activation. We include a summary of mutations found to cause constitutive activity and discuss the implications of these data for the structure, function, and activation mechanism of muscarinic receptors. Finally, we discuss the possible physiological significance of constitutive activity of muscarinic receptors, incorporating information provided by targeted deletion of each of the muscarinic subtypes.

An investigation of whether agonist-selective receptor conformations occur with respect to M2 and M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor signalling via Gi/o and Gs proteins

1. A range of muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptor agonists (methacholine (MCh), oxotremorine-M (OXO-M), oxotremorine (OXO), arecoline (AREC), bethanechol (BETH), pilocarpine (PILO)) have been investigated with respect to their binding to, and activation of, M(2) and M(4) mACh receptors, recombinantly expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, to explore the possibility that these agonists may differentially affect mACh receptor-G(i/o) and -G(s) coupling. 2. M(2)/M(4) mACh receptor coupling to the adenylyl cyclase/cyclic AMP signalling pathway has been explored in intact cells. G(i/o)-mediated negative coupling to adenylyl cyclase was explored functionally by assessing the ability of the mACh receptor agonists to inhibit forskolin-stimulated enzymic activity. Following pertussis toxin treatment (100 ng ml(-1), 18-20 h) to inactivate G(i/o) proteins, each agonist caused a G(s)-mediated enhancement of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. 3. At both M(2) and M(4) mACh receptors, all agonists tested were more potent in mediating G(i/o)- versus G(s)-coupled responses. This difference (determined as the pIC(50) (G(i/o) coupling) minus pEC(50) (G(s) coupling) value) was greatest for AREC (65-75-fold) and least for BETH and PILO (</=10-fold). 4. Using apparent binding affinities (pK(B)), and potency (EC(50)/IC(50)) and responsiveness (E(max)/I(max)) estimates, relative efficacy (e(rel)) values for each agonist with respect to M(2) and M(4) mACh receptor coupling to G(i/o)- and G(s)-mediated signalling were also calculated. While the e(rel) values obtained for MCh and OXO-M in CHO-m2 cells were similar, OXO-M behaved as a 'super-agonist' at the M(4) mACh receptor giving greater e(rel) values for both G(i/o) and G(s) coupling relative to MCh. 5. The experimental data indicate that while interesting differences between agonists with respect to M(2)/M(4) mACh receptor activation and receptor-G(i/o) and -G(s) coupling can be discerned, no clear examples of agonist trafficking of signal have emerged.

Cholinergic agonists transactivate EGFR and stimulate MAPK to induce goblet cell secretion

Conjunctival goblet cells are the primary source of mucins in the mucous layer, the innermost layer of the tear film. Conjunctival goblet cell mucin secretion is under neural control because exogenous addition of parasympathetic agonists stimulates goblet cell secretion. To elucidate the intracellular signal pathways used by cholinergic agonists to stimulate goblet cell mucin secretion, we determined whether p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is activated during cholinergic agonist-stimulated mucin secretion. Rat conjunctiva was removed, preincubated with or without antagonists, and stimulated with the cholinergic agonist carbachol (10(-4) M). Carbachol statistically significantly stimulated the phosphorylation of MAPK in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. U-0126, an inhibitor of MAPK activation, completely inhibited both the activation of MAPK and goblet cell secretion stimulated by carbachol. The M(1) muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine, the M(2) muscarinic antagonist gallamine, and the M(1)/M(3) muscarinic receptor antagonist N-(3-chloropropyl)-4-piperidinyl diphenylacetate (4-DAMP) also inhibited carbachol-stimulated MAPK activation. Increasing the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration with a Ca(2+) ionophore increased MAPK activation, and chelation of extracellular Ca(2+) inhibited carbachol-stimulated activation. Carbachol also increased tyrosine phosphorylation of Pyk2, p60Src, and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The Src inhibitor PP1 and the EGFR inhibitor AG-1478 completely inhibited carbachol-stimulated MAPK activation. AG-1478 also inhibited goblet cell secretion. We conclude that carbachol transactivates the EGFR to activate MAPK, leading to conjunctival goblet cell secretion. In addition, carbachol also activates Pyk2 and p60Src that could play a role in the transactivation of the EGFR.

Modelling the consequences of receptor-G-protein promiscuity

Many G-protein-coupled receptors interact with more than one type of G protein, giving rise to extreme variability in the effects of receptor activation, depending on, for example, receptor density and desensitization, efficacy of agonists, and availability of specific G proteins. This leads to errors in interpretation of data. To facilitate understanding the consequences of receptor-G-protein promiscuity, we use two simplified models to simulate such consequences. Applied to the regulation of adenylyl cyclase and phosphoinositidase, the models predict seemingly paradoxical situations and explain some phenomena that, at first sight, might seem to require the induction of agonist-specific (G-protein-selective) receptor conformations.

Mechanisms of inverse agonism at G-protein-coupled receptors

Many drugs with important therapeutic actions that had been assumed to be antagonists at G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to be inverse agonists. For both basic pharmacology and drug design it is important to understand the mechanisms whereby these drugs achieve their effects. It had been assumed that these drugs achieved their effects by stabilizing an inactive state of the receptor (R) at the expense of a partially activated state (R*). In this article, I consider this and other mechanisms that could explain inverse agonist actions, and conclude that more than one mechanism can apply to inverse agonism at GPCRs.

Mechanisms of inverse agonism of antipsychotic drugs at the D(2) dopamine receptor: use of a mutant D(2) dopamine receptor that adopts the activated conformation

The antipsychotic drugs have been shown to be inverse agonists at the D(2) dopamine receptor. We have examined the mechanism of this inverse agonism by making mutations in residue T343 in the base of the sixth transmembrane spanning region of the receptor. T343R, T343S and T343K mutant D(2) dopamine receptors were made and the T343R mutant characterized in detail. The T343R mutant D(2) dopamine receptor exhibits properties of a receptor that resides more in the activated state, namely increased agonist binding affinity (independent of G-protein coupling and dependent on agonist efficacy), increased agonist potency in functional tests (adenylyl cyclase inhibition) and increased inverse agonist effects. The binding of agonists to the mutant receptor also shows sensitivity to sodium ions, unlike the native receptor, so that isomerization of the receptor to its inactive state may be driven by sodium ions. The binding of inverse agonists to the receptor is, however, unaffected by the mutation. We conclude that inverse agonism at this receptor is not achieved by the inverse agonist binding preferentially to the non-activated state of the receptor over the activated state. Rather the inverse agonist appears to bind to all forms of the receptor but then renders the receptor inactive.

Dual effects of muscarinic M(2) acetylcholine receptors on the synthesis of cyclic AMP in CHO cells: dependence on time, receptor density and receptor agonists

1. Muscarinic M(2) receptors normally inhibit the production of cyclic AMP via G(i) proteins, but a stimulatory component occurs in their effect at high agonist concentrations, believed to be based on the activation of G(s) proteins. We investigated the conditions which determine the occurrence and extent of the stimulatory component in CHO cells stably expressing muscarinic M(2) receptors. 2. Biphasic concentration-response curves (decline followed by return towards control values) were obtained after 10 min incubation with carbachol, oxotremorine-M, acetylcholine, arecoline and arecaidine propargyl ester, but the upward phase was missing with oxotremorine, methylfurmethide, furmethide and pentylthio-TZTP. Shortening the incubation favoured the occurrence of the stimulatory component. Carbachol (1 mM) and oxotremorine-M (1 mM) brought about net stimulation (above 100% of control) of cyclic AMP synthesis during 2 min incubations. The stimulatory components disappeared after the density of receptors had been lowered with oxyphenonium mustard. 3. All agonists stimulated the synthesis of cyclic AMP in cells pretreated with pertussis toxin. 4. Most differences between agonists regarding the stimulatory component of their effect on cyclic AMP synthesis could be explained by differences in their efficacy and the induced receptor internalization. 5. We propose that the G(s)-mediated stimulatory component of the effect of muscarinic M(2) receptors on cyclic AMP synthesis only occurs if the density of activated receptors is high enough to saturate the G(i) proteins and proportionate to the receptors' low affinity for the G(s) proteins. It tends to be abolished by receptor internalization.

The role of receptor structure in determining adenosine receptor activity

Adenosine produces a wide variety of physiological effects through the activation of cell surface adenosine receptors (ARs). ARs are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family, and currently, four subtypes, the A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR, are recognized. This review focuses on the role of receptor structure in governing various facets of AR activity. Ligand-binding properties of ARs are primarily dictated by amino acids in the transmembrane domains of the receptors, although a role for extracellular domains of certain ARs has been suggested. Studies have identified certain amino acids conserved amongst AR subtypes that are critical for ligand recognition, as well as additional residues that may differentiate between agonist and antagonist ligands. Receptor regions responsible for activation of Gs have been identified for the A2AAR. The location of these intracellular sites is consistent with findings described for other G-protein-coupled receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis has been employed to analyze the structural basis for the differences in the kinetics of the desensitization response displayed by various AR subtypes. For the A2AAR and A3AR, agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of the AR, presumably via a G-protein receptor kinase, has been shown to occur. For these AR subtypes, intracellular regions or individual amino acids that may be targets for this phosphorylation have been identified. Finally, the role of A1AR gene structure in regulating the expression of this AR subtype is reviewed.

Mechanisms of agonism and inverse agonism at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors

Mechanisms of agonist and inverse agonist action at the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor have been studied using the modulation of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thiotriphosphate) ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in membranes of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the receptor (CHO-5-HTA1A cells). A range of agonists increased [35S]GTPgammaS binding with different potencies and to different maximal extents, whereas two compounds, methiothepin and spiperone, inhibited both agonist-stimulated and basal [5S]GTPgammaS binding, thus exhibiting inverse agonism. Potencies of agonists to stimulate [35S]GTPgammaS binding in membranes from CHO-5-HT1A cells were reduced by adding increasing concentrations of GDP to assays, whereas changes in sodium ion concentration did not affect agonist potency. The maximal effect of the agonists was increased by increasing sodium ion concentrations. The affinities of agonists in ligand binding assays were unaffected by changes in sodium ion concentration. Increasing GDP in the assays of the inverse agonists increased potency for spiperone to inhibit [35S]GTPgammaS binding and had no effect for methiothepin, in agreement with the sensitivity of these compounds to guanine nucleotides in ligand binding assays. Potencies for these inverse agonists were unaffected by changes in sodium ion concentration. These data were simulated using the extended ternary complex model. These simulations showed that the data obtained with agonists were consistent with these compounds achieving agonism by stabilising the ternary complex. For inverse agonists, the simulations showed that the mechanism for spiperone may be to stabilise forms of the receptor uncoupled from G proteins. Methiothepin, however, probably does not alter the equilibrium distribution of different receptor species; rather, this inverse agonist may stabilise an inactive form of the receptor that can still couple to G protein.

Kinetics versus equilibrium: the importance of GTP in GPCR activation

Agonist-bound G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) facilitate GDP-GTP exchange on their cognate G proteins. The binding properties of GPCRs are adequately described by the ternary complex model. However, in this article a more realistic (steady-state) model, which is necessary to describe the catalytic effect of agonist-bound receptors on G-protein activation, will be discussed. This model predicts that agonist potency and efficacy might vary from tissue to tissue, depending on the G-protein concentration and can be extended to explain why an agonist's ability to increase the receptor's affinity for empty G proteins (in the absence of GTP) is related to the agonist's efficacy.

Double mutant cycle analysis of aspartate 69, 97, and 103 to asparagine mutants in the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor

Double mutant cycles provide a method for analyzing the effects of a mutation at a defined position in the protein structure on the properties of an amino acid at a second site. This approach was used to map potential interactions between aspartates 69, 97, and 103 in the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor transmembrane helices 2 and 3. Receptors containing single and double aspartate to asparagine mutants were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and their effects on ligand binding, signal transduction, and thermal stability determined. Analysis of the double mutant cycles showed that the mutations had approximately additive effects on ligand binding, signal transduction, and thermal stability. Ligand binding and thermal inactivation results support the conclusion that aspartate-103 is the ligand amine counterion. Effector coupling properties of the mutant receptors showed that aspartate-103 was also required for signal transduction activity. The mutation of aspartate-69 to asparagine completely eliminated signal transduction by the agonists acetylcholine, carbachol, and pilocarpine but not oxotremorine M, which caused reduced but significant inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and stimulation of phospholipase C. In contrast, adenylyl cyclase stimulation by the asparagine-69 mutant was elicited only by acetylcholine and carbachol but not by oxotremorine M. The variation in agonist-dependent effector coupling properties provides evidence that the asparagine-69 mutant can exist in activated receptor states that are different from the wild-type m2 muscarinic receptor.

Direct dopamine D2-receptor-mediated modulation of arachidonic acid release in transfected CHO cells without the concomitant administration of a Ca2+-mobilizing agent

In CHO cells transfected with the rat dopamine D2 receptor (long isoform), administration of dopamine per se elicited a concentration-dependent increase in arachidonic acid (AA) release. The maximal effect was 197% of controls (EC50=25 nM). The partial D2 receptor agonist, (-)-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine [(-)-3-PPP], also induced AA release, but with somewhat lower efficacy (maximal effect: 165%; EC50=91 nM). The AA-releasing effect of dopamine was counteracted by pertussis toxin, by the inhibitor of intracellular Ca2+ release, 8-(N N-diethylamino)octyl-3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate (TMB-8), by excluding calcium from the medium, by the phospholipase A2 (PLA2) inhibitor, quinacrine, and by long-term pretreatment with the phorbol ester, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). In addition, it was antagonized by the D2 antagonists, raclopride and (-)-sulpiride--but not by (+)-sulpiride--and absent in sham-transfected CHO cells devoid of D2 receptors. The results obtained contrast to the previous notion that dopamine and other D2 receptor agonists require the concomitant administration of calcium-mobilizing agents such as ATP, ionophore A-23187 (calcimycin), thrombin, and TRH, to influence AA release from various cell lines.

Role of Ca++/calmodulin binding proteins in Aspergillus nidulans cell cycle regulation

The goal of this review is to summarise the current knowledge concerning the targets of Ca++/calmodulin that are essential for cell cycle progression in lower eukaryotes. Emphasis is placed on Aspergillus nidulans since this is the only organism to date shown to posses essential Ca++ dependent calmodulin activated enzymes. Two such enzymes are the calmodulin activated protein phosphatase, calcineurin and the calmodulin dependent protein kinase. These proteins, each the product of a unique gene, are required for progression of quiescent spores into the proliferative cycle and also for execution of the nuclear division cycle in exponentially growing germlings.

Neuromedin B activates phospholipase D through both PKC-dependent and PKC-independent mechanisms

The actions of neuromedin B (NMB), a recently discovered mammalian bombesin-related peptide, are mediated by interacting with a distinct receptor; however, little is known about its cellular basis of action. Recent studies show activation of phospholipase D (PLD) is an important transduction cascade for a number of GI hormones, especially for stimulation of growth and protein sorting. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether activation of the NMB receptor causes activation of PLD and to explore whether this activation was coupled to PLC activation. Rat C6 glioblastoma cells (C6 cells), which contain a low density of native NMB receptors and BALB 3T3 cells stably transfected with rat NMB receptors, were used. NMB caused a 3-fold increase in C6 cells and an 11-fold increase in rNMB-R transfected cells in PLD activity. Increases in PLD activity were rapid and NMB was 100-fold more potent than gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP). NMB caused a half-maximal increase in [Ca2+]i at 0.2 nM, in [3H]IP and PLD at 1 nM, and half-maximal receptor occupation at 1.2 nM. TPA increased PLD dose-dependently with a half-maximal effect at 60 nM. The calcium ionophore A23187 (1 microM) alone did not increase PLD activity but potentiated the effect of TPA. The Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor, thapsigargin, did not affect NMB- or TPA-stimulated PLD activities, although it blocked completely the NMB-induced increase in [Ca2+]i. The PKC inhibitor GF109203X completely abolished TPA-induced PLD activity, however, it only inhibited NMB-induced PLD activity by 20%. The combination of thapsigargin and GF109203X had the same effect as GF109203X alone. These data indicate that NMB receptor activation is coupled to both PLC and PLD. In contrast to a number of other phospholipase C-coupled receptors, NMB receptor stimulated changes in [Ca2+]i do not contribute to PLD activation. Both PKC-dependent and PKC-independent mechanisms are involved in the NMB-stimulated PLD activation with the PKC-independent pathway predominating.

Site-directed mutagenesis on the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: the significance of Tyr403 in the binding of agonists and functional coupling

The first step in the transmembrane signal mediated by G protein-coupled receptors is binding of agonist to receptors at the cell surface. The mechanism of the resulting receptor activation is not clear, but models based on the ternary complex model are capable of explaining most of the observations that have been reported in G protein-coupled receptors. This model suggests that a single agonist/receptor/G protein complex capable of activating G protein is formed as the result of agonist binding. Extensions of this basic model differ primarily in whether an equilibrium between active and inactive conformations is required to explain experimental results. We report results on ligand binding and coupling to physiological effector systems of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor site-directed mutant Y403F (residue 403 mutated from tyrosine to phenylalanine) expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and compare our results with results reported for the homologous Y506F mutation in the m3 muscarinic receptor [J. Biol. Chem. 267:19313-19319 (1992)]. The mutation in the m2 muscarinic receptor reduced absolute agonist affinities more dramatically than in the m3 muscarinic receptor. Unlike the results reported for the m3 subtype mutant, in which coupling to physiological effector systems was reduced, coupling to effector systems for the mutant in the m2 subtype was robust. In the Y403F m2 muscarinic receptor, the difference between the two agonist binding affinities was greater than in the wild-type receptor, whereas in the m3 subtype, the effect of the mutation was to decrease this difference. A prediction of the ternary complex model is that relative binding affinities will affect the steady state concentration of the agonist/receptor/G protein complex and, as the result, the extent of G protein coupling. These results can best be rationalized by this model, which suggests that the activation of G protein-coupled receptors is achieved by the relative affinity of agonist for two receptor states and does not require the existence of multiple states in conformational equilibrium.

Effect of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor number on receptor affinity, coupling, degradation, and modulation

The relationship between receptor number and agonist-induced intracellular responses has been well studied in receptors coupled to adenylate cyclase; however, for receptors coupled to phospholipase C (PLC), very little is known about the effect of receptor number on receptor-mediated processes. To explore this issue, we investigated the effect of the number of receptors for gastrin-releasing peptide (GRP) on ligand affinity and on the ability to activate intracellular messengers [PLC, tyrosine phosphorylation of p125 focal adhesion kinase (p125FAK)] and cause receptor modulation (internalization, desensitization, down-regulation) and ligand degradation. Three BALB 3T3 cell lines were made that stably expressed the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R) with receptor numbers varying by 280-fold (GRP-R-Low, GRP-R-Med, and GRP-R-Hi). Each cell line had the same affinity for agonist. The efficacy for bombesin to increase [3H]inositol phosphates but not tyrosine phosphorylation of p125FAK correlated well with receptor number. In contrast, the EC50 value for [3H]inositol phosphate generation for bombesin was the same in each cell line. Receptor number did not alter internalization. In the absence of protease inhibitors, there was an inverse correlation between receptor number and receptor down-regulation and desensitization. However, with protease inhibitors present, GRP-R-Med and GRP-R-Hi down-regulated significantly less than the GRP-R-Low. Similarly, GRP-R-Low desensitized significantly more than GRP-R-Med or GRP-R-Hi. GRP-R-Hi caused significantly greater ligand degradation than GRP-R-Low, and protease inhibitors completely inhibited degradation by GRP-R-Low and inhibited degradation by 70% for GRP-R-Hi. In conclusion, we show that for the PLC-coupled GRP-R, receptor number had little or no effect on binding affinity, potency for activating PLC, tyrosine phosphorylation of p125FAK, or extent of receptor internalization. In contrast, receptor number had an effect on ligand degradation, down-regulation, desensitization, and efficacy of PLC activation without altering the efficacy of tyrosine phosphorylation of p125FAK. These results demonstrate that the effect of receptor number differs for the different functions mediated by the GRP receptor and differs from that reported for adenylate cyclase-coupled receptors such as receptors mediating the action of adrenergic agents, secretin, and opioids.

Identification of A2a adenosine receptor domains involved in selective coupling to Gs. Analysis of chimeric A1/A2a adenosine receptors

Responses to adenosine are governed by selective activation of distinct G proteins by adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes. The A2aAR couples via Gs to adenylyl cyclase stimulation while the A1AR couples to Gi to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. To determine regions of the A2aAR that selectively couple to Gs, chimeric A1/A2aARs were expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and ligand binding and adenylyl cyclase activity analyzed. Replacement of the third intracellular loop of the A2aAR with that of the A1AR reduced maximal adenylyl cyclase stimulation and decreased agonist potency. Restricted chimeras indicated that the NH2-terminal portion of intracellular loop 3 was predominantly responsible for this impairment. Reciprocal chimeras composed primarily of A1AR sequence with limited A2aAR sequence substitution stimulated adenylyl cyclase and thus supported these findings. A lysine and glutamic acid residue were identified as necessary for efficient A2aAR-Gs coupling. Analysis of chimeric receptors in which sequence of intracellular loop 2 was substituted indicated that the nature of amino acids in this domain may indirectly modulate A2aAR-Gs coupling. Replacement of the cytoplasmic tail of the A2aAR with the A1AR tail did not affect adenylyl cyclase stimulation. Thus, selective activation of Gs is predominantly dictated by the NH2-terminal segment of the third intracellular loop of the A2aAR.

Activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors via their allosteric binding sites

Ligands that bind to the allosteric-binding sites on muscarinic acetylcholine receptors alter the conformation of the classical-binding sites of these receptors and either diminish or increase their affinity for muscarinic agonists and classical antagonists. It is not known whether the resulting conformational change also affects the interaction between the receptors and the G proteins. We have now found that the muscarinic receptor allosteric modulators alcuronium, gallamine, and strychnine (acting in the absence of an agonist) alter the synthesis of cAMP in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing the M2 or the M4 subtype of muscarinic receptors in the same direction as the agonist carbachol. In addition, most of their effects on the production of inositol phosphates in CHO cells expressing the M1 or the M3 muscarinic receptor subtypes are also similar to (although much weaker than) those of carbachol. The agonist-like effects of the allosteric modulators are not observed in CHO cells that have not been transfected with the gene for any of the subtypes of muscarinic receptors. The effects of alcuronium on the formation of cAMP and inositol phosphates are not prevented by the classical muscarinic antagonist quinuclidinyl benzilate. These observations demonstrate for the first time that the G protein-mediated functional responses of muscarinic receptors can be evoked not only from their classical, but also from their allosteric, binding sites. This represents a new mechanism of receptor activation.

Desensitization and internalization of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor are directed by independent mechanisms

The phenomenon of acute desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors has been associated with several events, including receptor phosphorylation, loss of high affinity agonist binding, receptor:G-protein uncoupling, and receptor internalization. However, the biochemical events underlying these processes are not fully understood, and their contributions to the loss of signaling remain correlative. In addition, the nature of the kinases and the receptor domains which are involved in modulation of activity have only begun to be investigated. In order to directly measure the role of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) in the desensitization of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (m2 mAChR), a dominant-negative allele of GRK2 was used to inhibit receptor phosphorylation by endogenous GRK activity in a human embryonic kidney cell line. The dominant-negative GRK2K220R reduced agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the m2 mAChR by approximately 50% and prevented acute desensitization of the receptor as measured by the ability of the m2 mAChR to attenuate adenylyl cyclase activity. In contrast, the agonist-induced internalization of the m2 mAChR was unaffected by the GRK2K220R construct. Further evidence linking receptor phosphorylation to acute receptor desensitization was obtained when two deletions of the third intracellular loop were made which created m2 mAChRs that did not become phosphorylated in an agonist-dependent manner and did not desensitize. However, the mutant mAChRs retained the ability to internalize. These data provide the first direct evidence that GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation is necessary for m2 mAChR desensitization; the likely sites of in vivo phosphorylation are in the central portion of the third intracellular loop (amino acids 282-323). These results also indicate that internalization of the m2 receptor is not a key event in desensitization and is mediated by mechanisms distinct from GRK phosphorylation of the receptor.

Purification of recombinant porcine m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor from Chinese hamster ovary cells. Circular dichroism spectra and ligand binding properties

The recombinant porcine m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (rPm2R) from Chinese hamster ovary cells has been purified to homogeneity. Two mg of purified rPm2R, with a specific activity of 12 nmol of R-(-)-quinuclidinyl benzilate/mg of protein, were obtained from 30 ml of packed Chinese hamster ovary cells. The apparent molecular mass (78.5 kDa) and specific activity for the rPm2R preparation were the same as that for the Pm2R purified from atrial tissue, but the yield was 100 times greater. Purified rPm2R bound agonist and antagonist with the same affinities and coupled to the inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding protein with the same efficiency as the purified native atrial Pm2R. Ligand binding studies were consistent with a single class of antagonist binding sites but two subclasses of agonist binding sites. The fraction of rPm2R having high affinity for agonists was increased by mM Mg2+, low detergent concentration, and low temperature. Circular dichroism spectra obtained for the purified rPm2R with and without agonists were indistinguishable, but spectra for the antagonist-occupied receptor showed reproducibly deeper characteristic negative deflections at 208 and 220 nm. Secondary structure analysis of the CD spectra predicted 53% alpha-helix for the free receptor and 49% alpha-helix for the R-(-)-quinuclidinyl benzilate-receptor complex.